Country Hills Post Acute
1580 Broadway, El Cajon, CA 92021 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 305 certified beds · (619) 441-8745 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $122,210 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-17)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 14.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.41 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.58 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 223 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 205 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.3%CMS range 35.5–49.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.2%CMS range 6.5–12.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 49.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.7%CMS range 7.0–12.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.56 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 305 beds and averages 292.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.455 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
73 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 62 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of five sampled residents were free from significant medication errors (an error which causes the resident discomfort or jeopardizes his or her health and safety) when: 1. Resident 1 received a fentanyl patch (a potent pain medication) which belonged to another resident (Resident 2) without a physician's order. 2. Resident 2 was not administered a fentanyl patch by nursing staff as ordered by the physician. 3. A fentanyl patch was administered to Resident 2 without verification that the previously administered fentanyl patch was removed. 4. A Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 did not properly identify (establish or indicate who someone is) Resident 3 prior to administering medications. As a result of these failures, Resident 1 was placed at risk for adverse reactions (an undesired effect of a drug) due to receiving a potent opioid (a type of drug used to reduce moderate to severe pain) without a physician's order. In addition, these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain and collect urine) care per facility policy for two (Resident 9 and Resident 18) of five sampled residents with urinary catheters when staff it did not:Provide meatal care (cleaning the area where a urinary catheter enters the body [the meatus] daily using mild soap and water to prevent infections) to Resident 9 for six days after readmission from the hospital.Secure Resident 18 's urinary catheter drainage bag to the frame of the bed, allowing drainage bag to rest on her bedroom floor. This failure had the potential for Resident 9 and Resident 18's urinary catheters to be at a higher risk for urinary tract infections and put their overall health at risk. Findings:1. Review of admission Record indicated Resident 9 was re-admitted on [DATE], (originally first admitted on [DATE]) for diagnoses which included: Paraplegia (the partial or complete paralysis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately code a stage IV (4) pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone) on the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) after a [NAME] Ulcer (nonhealing skin sore that may form when you're dying ) was reclassified as a Stage IV pressure ulcer, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). These deficient practices placed Resident 1 at risk for inaccurate assessment data, inappropriate care planning and misrepresentation of the resident's health status to Centers for Medicare Services (CMS).A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of Pressure Ulcer of Sacral (lower back/tailbone) Region and Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). A record review of Resident 1's minimum data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to proper infection control practices for one of four residents sampled residents (Resident 1) when:Resident 1's leaking/overflowing urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to aide in urine flow) was placed in a fracture pan (a device used to hold urine) and a urine-soaked towel were left on the floor.Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- gown, gloves) prior to providing direct patient care.These failures had the potential for cross contamination (spread of germs and bacteria) and infection to residents, staff and visitors.Findings :1.According to the admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included obstructive and reflux uropathy (a blockage in the body that makes it urinate) and resistance to multiple antibiotics (occurs when antibiotics are no longer effective, making infections difficult to treat).A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to a resident not having a bowel movement for four days, for one of two sampled residents (1). As a result, Resident 1 was admitted to the hospital with diagnoses to include fecal impaction (hard stool that gets stuck in the body and is difficult to pass).Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include muscle weakness. Per the facility's Weekly Summary, dated 2/22/26, Resident 1's last bowel movement was on 2/22/26. Per the facility's Documentation Survey Report v2 for February 2026, under Bowel Continence, Resident did not have any bowel movements on the 23rd, 24th, 25th, or 26th (Four days without a bowel movement). Per the facility's Medication Administration Record for February 2026, Resident 1 had an order dated 11/10/25 for magnesium hydroxide (a medication to treat constipation), to be given if Resident 1 did not have a bowel movement for three days. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one of three residents reviewed for discharges (Resident 1) to return to the facility following a hospitalization for aggressive verbal and physical behavior.This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive continuity of care, violated her right to return to the facility per behold agreement, and extended Resident 1's hospital stay unnecessarily.Findings:According to the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included psychotic disorder (a mental health condition causing a loss of contact with reality) with hallucinations due to known physiological condition (related to the function of the body or parts of the body, such as the brain), and dementia (loss of memory, problem-solving, and other thinking skills).During a record review, the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), dated 1/29/26, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview For Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurately documented records when Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 documented he removed a fentanyl (a potent medication used to control pain) patch (a medication that is applied to the skin) although Resident 2 did not have a fentanyl patch to be removed at that time.This failure resulted in inaccurate documentation in Resident 2's medical record and had the potential to negatively affect her treatment and assessment.Findings:During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/17/26 at 3:16 P.M., the DON stated that LN 1 documented he removed Resident 2's fentanyl patch on 2/28/26 on Resident 2's February 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR, an official legal document that has a complete and accurate record of all medications administered to a resident to ensure patient safety). The DON stated there was an order to start the fentanyl patch on 2/25/26, but the medication was not delivered until 2/28/26. The DON stated Resident 2 did not have a patch to be removed on 2/28/26.A review of Resident 2's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of an injury of unknown origin to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), Ombudsman, and/or law enforcement (LE) in accordance with the facility's abuse reporting policy and procedures, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This deficient practice placed one resident (Resident 1) at risk for uninvestigated abuse, neglect, or mistreatment and delayed protective oversight by the appropriate authorities.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities).A record review of Resident 1's MDS (Minimum data set: nursing facility assessment tool) dated 1/27/26 indicated that Resident 1 was rarely or unable to understand others or make self-understood and had severe cognitive (the mental processes that take place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure thorough investigation and appropriate corrective action of an abuse allegation when staff was not aware of the resident-to-resident altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 6, This failure had the potential for not protecting other residents from Resident 1.Findings: On 1/23/26 at 8:39 A.M., an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted related to a reported resident to resident altercation. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (an impairment of brain function, such as memory loss and judgment) according to the facility's admission Record.A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 11/21/25, section C0500 indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- evaluates cognition, the ability to remember and think clearly) score was 5, severe problems with thinking and memory. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to make medical records available for Family Member (FM) 1 to review within 24 hours of the request, for one of two sampled residents (1). As a result, Resident 1 was not aware of the details of his medical record and the facility violated his right to access his medical records.Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, deaf (inability to hear) nonspeaking, and parkinsonism (a group of symptoms that include difficulty moving). Per the facility's Authorization Form for the Release of Health Information, dated 11/22/24, Resident 1 authorized the facility to release his medical records to FM 1. Per the facility's Authorization Form for the Release of Health Information, dated 3/18/25, Resident 1 authorized the facility to release his medical records to FM 1. On 7/3/25 at 11:27 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the Medical Records Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine bathing hygiene to one of four residents (Resident 2), dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living, (ADL-bathing, dressing, toileting, and re-positioning), when reviewed for Quality of Care.This failure had the potential for skin issues to develop and for Resident 2 to experience low self-esteem. Findings:An unannounced visit was made to the facility on 7/29/25, regarding a complaint. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis which included morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, per the facility's admission Record.Resident 2's clinical record review was conducted on 7/29/25.According to the Admission, Minimum Data Set, (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 4/25/25, a cognitive score of 12 was listed, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The Functional Abilities assessment indicated Resident 2 required maximum staff assistant with turning and transferring.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 62 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to administer pain medication for two of four residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) per the Nursing Standards of Practice, reviewed for Quality of Care when: 1. Pain medication was administered to Resident 1 without assessing the level of pain before or after administration of a narcotic (a controlled that is regulated by the government due to its potential for abuse and addiction) and, 2. The correct pain medication was not administered to Resident 2 according to the pain scale (1-10: 1 being the least amount of pain and 10 being the worst pain). These failures had the potential for Resident 1 to experience addiction and for Resident 2 to not receive adequate pain relief.Findings:1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included abnormalities of gait and mobility, per the facility's admission Record.A review of Resident 1's clinical record was conducted on 7/29/25.According to Resident 1's annual Minimum Data Set, (MDS-a federally mandated resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure prescription medication when:1. A treatment cart (a cart with prescribed lotions and creams, used to treat wounds and skin conditions) was left unlocked for one of six treatment carts (Station 2 North); and,2. Medication was left on top of a medication cart, unsupervised for one of 11 medication carts (Station 3 North); and,3. Medication was left unsupervised at the bedside for one of four residents (Resident 1) when reviewed for safe medication storage.These failures had the potential for unauthorized people (resident, staff, and visitors) to have access to medications not prescribed to them.Findings: 1. An observation was conducted on 7/29/25 at 10:22 A.M. near the nursing station on 2 north. A treatment cart was unlocked, and no staff were nearby. The treatment cart contained medicated creams and lotions in the first and second drawers. Sitting across from the treatment cart were four residents. One male resident wearing a red outfit, walked past the treatment cart twice. Also observed walking past…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were accurate and concise for one of four residents (Resident 1) when: 1. A quarterly pain assessment was not conducted for Resident 1, to determine if pain levels had increased or decreased over the past three months; and;2. Routine pain mediation was not charted for Resident 1 after administrated and was charted hours later.These failures provided inaccurate documentation in Resident 1's clinical records and could cause staff confusion.Finding: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included abnormalities of gait and mobility, per the facility's admission Record.A review of Resident 1's clinical record was conducted on 7/29/25. According to Resident 1's annual Minimum Data Set, (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 6/12/25, a cognitive score of 15 was listed, indicating cognition was intact. The Pain Assessment indicated no pain in the past five days. According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY ountry Hills 558-E Accommodation of Needs Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with an alert call system for 20 of 44 Residents (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23) in order for staff to respond to their needs, after their electronic call system stopped working on Station 3 North, when reviewed for Accommodation of Needs. In addition, three of the 21 residents (23, 24, and 25) with manual call bells had their call bells out of reach. This failure had the potential for 26 Residents to not have their needs met in a timely manner. Findings: On 6/10/25, an unannounced visit was conducted in response to a complaint of call lights not working on Station 3 North. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/10/25 at 11:58 A.M. The DON stated the call light system on Station 3 North stopped working on Wednesday 6/4/25. The DON was unaware if the call light outage was reported to the California Department…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to correctly administer medications for one of six residents reviewed for competent nursing staff. (Resident 1) As a result of this deficient practice, the facility could not ensure medications were accurately and safely provided to residents. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sequelae (after effect) of cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain) and hypertension (high blood pressure) according to the facility's admission Record. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction according to the facility's admission Record. On 4/7/25 at 9:05 A.M., an unannounced onsite visit to the facility was conducted related to a medication error. During an interview on 4/7/25 at 9:05 A.M. with the Assistant Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were correctly administered according to the physician's order for one of six residents (Resident 1) reviewed for pharmacy services. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility could not ensure pharmaceutical services were safely provided to its residents. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sequelae (after effect) of cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain) and hypertension (high blood pressure) according to the facility's admission Record. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction according to the facility's admission Record. On 4/7/25 at 9:05 A.M., an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted related to a medication error. During an interview on 4/7/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to correctly administer medications for one of six residents reviewed for medication errors. (Resident 1) This failure has the potential affect Resident 1's health and wellbeing. In addition, this failure has the potential to place other residents at risk for medication errors. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sequelae (after effect) of cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain) and hypertension (high blood pressure) according to the facility's admission Record. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction according to the facility's admission Record. On 4/7/25 at 9:05 A.M., an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted related to a medication error. During an interview on 4/7/25 at 9:05 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff maintained sanitary food practices when: 1. Drying racks and a drying cart were not clean; and 2. The hanging sprinkler system (Ansel) heads above the stove were covered in dust; and 3. A beard net was not being worn by a dishwasher; and 4. A dishwasher aide did not wash his hands after removing trash and reentering the kitchen. These failures had the potential for cross contamination and to cause food borne illness. Findings: 1. An observation and interview was conducted with Dietary Manager (DM) of the 3-compartment sink area on 3/12/25 at 8:17 A.M., Large pots and pans were upside down, air drying on 3-rack metal shelves next to the 3-compartment sink area. The 3-racks that the pots and pans were resting on appeared dirty and gritty. A finger sweep was performed on each rack, which left a clear, distinguished line on the rack. The DM stated, Yes, I see what you mean, they are dirty. The DM stated the kitchen was deep cleaned every Wednesday, but he could not provide a check list of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure five out of 13 residents reviewed for dignity were provided care in a manner that promoted dignity and respect. (Resident 50, 218,148, 5 and 51) This failure had the potential for the residents' self-esteem and self-worth to be devalued. Findings: 1. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) and dementia (a condition characterized by loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities) according to the facility's admission Record. A record review of Resident 50's Activities of Daily Living (ADL-basic tasks of everyday life) care plan was conducted. The ADL care plan dated 6/24/20 indicated, .has a self-care deficit related to: .cognitive loss, dementia .Assist as needed with ADLs . 2. Resident 218 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dysphagia and dementia according to the facility's admission Record. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. According to the facility's admission Record, Resident 166 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cirrhosis of the liver, (a type of liver damage where healthy cells are replaced by scar tissue). Resident 166's clinical record was reviewed on 3/11/25. According to the facility's Smoking Observation/Assessment form, dated 12/13/24, Resident 166 was a tobacco user and required supervision while smoking. Resident 166's clinical record was reviewed on 3/11/25. According to Resident 166's care plan, titled Potential for Injury related to smoking, revised 2/12/25, listed interventions such as, cigarettes and lighter will be stored by the smoking monitor. Resident 166's clinical record was reviewed on 3/11/25. According to the admission MDS (Minimum Data Set: a federally required assessment tool), dated 12/19/24, Section J, titled Health Condition, Resident 166 was coded as not a tobacco user. An observation of Resident 166 was conducted on 3/13/15 at 4:03 P.M., while smoking on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to invite and notify residents and/or their responsible parties (RP) in advance about a Resident Council meeting and care conferences for three of five residents (Resident 150, 180, and 239) reviewed. These deficient practices placed all residents at risk for not having their preferences, health needs updated. This practice did not promote a person-centered care plan. The census was 302. Cross-Reference F867 Findings: On 3/12/25 at 10:12 A.M., an observation and interview with five resident council members were conducted, on the 4th floor dining room. Three residents (Residents 239, 180,150) stated they were not informed, invited, or asked to join a care conference with the interdisciplinary team (IDT-members of the facility involved with the resident's care) to provide their input on their preferences or to receive updates about their plan of care. Interview responses of residents on 3/12/25 at 10:12 A.M.: Resident 150 stated they don't ask me to come to care conference. Resident 180 stated she was in agreement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to set low-air loss mattresses (LALM: a pressure relieving air mattress to alleviate pressure to boney areas of the body to help prevent skin breakdown and injury) according to manufacture weight recommendations and/or resident comfort for five of 36 sampled residents (Resident 240, 207, 51, 55, and 219) at risk for pressure ulcers. These deficient practices placed residents (Resident 240, 207, 51, 55, and 219) at risk for skin breakdown and injuries. Cross-Reference F867 Findings. 1. A review of Resident 240's admission Record indicated Resident 240 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of left side hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the left side of the body). A record review of Resident 240's minimal data set (MDS-nursing facility assessment tool) dated 1/16/25 indicated Resident 240 had clear speech, was able to express her ideas and understood others. Resident 240 cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date and later discard resident food, stored in three of six resident refrigerators, when reviewed for safe food handling practices. This failure had the potential for stored food to cause a food borne illness if consumed by the resident. Findings: An observation and interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse 41 (LN 41) of Station 4's north resident refrigerator on 3/11/25 at 1:54 P.M. Observed inside the resident refrigerator was a tray of store purchased sushi with a clear lid. The sushi tray contained a residents' name and room number, but no date of when it was placed in the refrigerator. LN 41 could not locate a best use by date on the sushi container. A large white plastic bag which contained a resident name and room number was opened. Inside the large plastic bag was a plastic store container of spinach/artichoke dip, which was half consumed. The spinach/artichoke dip container had no date of when it was opened, and LN 41 could not locate a best use by date on the container. The large plastic bag also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly explain the arbitration (a contract that says if there is a disagreement or legal issue between a resident and the facility, it will be settled by a private process instead of going to court) agreement to four of five reviewed residents (Residents 239, 229, 180, and 150) leaving them unaware that signing it meant waiving their rights to take legal actions. This deficient practice placed residents (Residents 239, 229, 180, and 150) at risk for signing an agreement without fully understanding their rights and options. Findings: On 3/12/25 at 10:12 A.M., an observation and interview with five resident council members were conducted, at the 4th floor dining room. Four out of five residents (Residents 239, 229, 180, and 150) during the resident council meeting stated they did not understand what the arbitration agreement was, were unaware they had 30 days to decline it, and were not given a copy. Residents interviewed responses were:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA-facility group that monitors concerning trends in a facility) failed to identify and include in the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement plan (QAPI-plan developed by QAA to help improve conditions in the facility), trends identified by surveyors during the recertification survey concerning delay of call lights, smokers, Registered Dietician (RD) recommendations, kitchen hygiene, RD kitchen audits, resident care conferences, and low air loss mattress settings. These failures had the potential for the facility to overlook trends in resident care that may have affected residents' dignity and/or health. Cross Reference: F847, F625, F550, F686, F657 Findings: On 3/14/25 at 1:59 P.M., A concurrent interview and review of the facility's QAPI/QAA program was conducted with the Administrator (ADM) and the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the current QAPI programs were Falls, UTI, Hospital transfers, RNA residents, Infection reports, Pest control program, MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide one of 37 sampled residents (Resident 55) with a suitable call button (button used to call for assistance). This failure prevented Resident 55 (R55) from being able to use his call button and had the potential for R55 to not have his needs met. Cross reference F919 Findings: Review of admission Record indicated R55 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Cognitive Communication Deficit(difficulties in communication stemming from impairments in cognitive [thinking ability] functions like attention, memory, or problem-solving, rather than a primary language or speech problem), Functional Quadriplegia (the complete inability to move due to severe disability or frailty, but without physical injury or damage to the brain or spinal cord), and Metabolic Encephalopathy (a condition where the brain does not function properly). Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized, federally mandated assessment tool used in nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary living environment for one of four reviewed hospice (end of life care) residents (Resident 297) when the shared bathroom was found dirty with feces on surfaces and had a strong odor. These deficient practices placed Resident 297, other residents, staff, and visitors at risk for exposure to harmful bacteria and potential health hazard. This deficient practice also created an unsanitary living condition for residents using the bathroom. Cross-Reference F689 Findings: A review of Resident 297's admission Record indicated Resident 297 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of Malignant Neoplasm of the Prostate (prostate [male organ below the bladder] cancer that is life-threatening once the cancer spreads to other parts of the body). On 3/11/25 at 2:49 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 297 and family member's, in Resident 297's room. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of the bed-hold policy to residents at the time of transfer for one of 37 sampled residents (187). As a result, Resident 187 may not have been fully aware of the facility's bed-hold policy. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 187 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of paraplegia (Inability to move part of the body). On 3/13/25 at 10:10 A.M., an interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1. LN 1 stated, when she transferred a resident to an acute care hospital a written notice of bed-hold was not provided to the resident. On 3/13/25 at 10:18 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 2. LN 2 stated, when she transferred Resident 187 to an acute care hospital, she did not provide a written notice of bed-hold to Resident 187. LN 2 further stated, she forgot to document offering a bed-hold to Resident 187. On 3/13/25 at 10:32 A.M., an interview was conducted with Assistant Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to submit the Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated resident assessment tool) timely to the federal database after the MDS was completed and signed by the LN for one of 36 residents (Resident 196) sampled. This failure resulted in the late submission of the MDS to the federal database. Findings: A review of Resident 196's admission Record indicated Resident 196 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of Heart Failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling). A record review of Resident 196's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated, the MDS completion date was completed and signed on 1/27/25. On 3/13/25 at 12:26 P.M., a record review was conducted on the MDS Final Validation Report. The MDS Final Validation Report dated 2/16/25 indicated the quarterly MDS (dated 1/13/25) was submitted late. The MDS Final Validation Report indicated, .the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to create a comprehensive care plan to include special instructions for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 128). As a result Resident 128 was at risk for his dialysis to be interrupted or complications to occur by not having a staff person with him during dialysis. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 128 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD-irreversible kidney failure). Based on observations on 3/11/25 at 2:17 P.M. and 3/13/25 at 2:43 P.M. at the 2 South Nurse's Station, Resident 128 was returned to the facility via medical transport. Resident 128 was not accompanied by a facility staff member on either occasion. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/14/25 at 10:45 A.M. with Infection Preventionist (IP)1, Resident 128's electronic medical record was accessed and reviewed. The record indicated in the Special Instructions section that Staff must accompany to Dialysis.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide routine nail care to one of one resident (Resident 190) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL, activities related to personal care) for dependent residents. As a result, Resident 190 was at risk for skin injury and infection. Findings: Resident 190 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (complete weakness of one side of the body and weakness on one part of the body following a stroke), dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing) following a stroke and epilepsy (seizures) per the facility admission Record. A record review of Resident 190's physician history and physical examination (H&P) on 3/6/24 indicated Resident 190 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. On 3/12/25 at 2:43 P.M., an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 21. CNA 21stated on Sunday's nail care was being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe hazard free environment for two of 34 residents (Resident 14, and Resident 15). As a result: 1. Resident 14 was placed at risk when the nursing staff placed shower blankets and/or drawsheets on Resident 14's bathroom floor for convenience, creating a slipping hazard which could have resulted in serious injury. Cross-Reference F584 2. Resident 15 was placed at risk for smoke-related injuries and burns when the facility failed to assess Resident 15's current smoking status and safety plan. Findings: A review of Resident 14's admission Record indicated Resident 14 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of unsteadiness of feet (balance issues with walking, and/or standing). A clinical chart review was conducted on Resident 14's fall care plans that indicated the following: - Fall risk care plan initiated 9/13/23 and revised 12/10/24, indicated, .at risk for falls related to . I am…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the nutritional status was monitored for one of seven residents reviewed for nutrition, with progressive weight loss since admission (Resident 260). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 260 to experience further functional decline and loss of lean body mass (the body weight that includes muscles, bones, and organs and excludes fat). Findings: Resident 260 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) and pressure ulcers (bedsores) according to the facility's admission Record. On 3/11/25 at 8:20 A.M., Resident 260 was observed in bed. Resident 260 had good eye contact and nodded only upon greeting. An interview on 3/12/25 at 8:50 A.M. with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 35 was conducted. CNA 35 stated Resident 260 required feeding assistance with meals and one other CNA was responsible for assisting residents who required to be fed. CNA 35 stated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for post dialysis care (Res 51) and did not follow special instructions during dialysis (Res 128) for two of nine reviewed residents (Resident 51 and 128) These deficient practices placed the residents (Resident 51 and 128) at risk for complications such as infection, clotting, discomfort and compromised safety. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 51's admission Record indicated Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD: irreversible kidney failure) requiring dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed). A record review of Resident 51's MDS (Minimum data set: nursing facility assessment tool) dated 2/24/24 indicated that Resident 51 was rarely or unable to understand others or make self-understood and had severe cognitive (the mental processes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store and label Resident 204's breathing treatment medications. As a result, the facility could not ensure medications were safely stored. Findings: On [DATE] at 10:28 A.M., an observation and interview were conducted with Resident 204. Resident 204 was in bed and connected to an oxygen concentrator machine. There was a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure to keep airway while asleep) machine and nebulizer at bedside. Resident 204 pulled out unlabeled, undated and unpackage solution vials of Ipratropium- Albuterol medications from his bedside drawer. Resident 204 stated staff gave medications to him sometimes but he administered the solution via his nebulizer in the evenings. On [DATE] at 10:09 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with RT 21. Resident 204 pulled out unlabeled, undated and unpackaged solution vials of Ipratropium-Albuterol medications from his bedside drawer. Resident 204 stated in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control standards of practice when: 1. A facility staff did not sanitize a blood pressure cuff in between use for different residents, 2. The facility did not update their Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) policy and procedure (P&P) according to federal regulations. This failure had the potential to spread infection among the residents. In addition, staff had the potential to not know current standards of practice for preventing and controlling infections. Findings: 1. An initial tour of the facility was conducted on 3/11/25 at 9:25 A.M. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 31 was observed in the hall holding a portable wrist blood pressure cuff. CNA 31 stated she was taking her residents' vital signs (temperature, pulse, respirations and blood pressure). CNA 31 was observed entering room [ROOM NUMBER] and was observed from the hallway taking a resident's blood pressure with the portable wrist blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide two residents of 37 sampled residents (Resident 55 and Resident 268) with functional call buttons. This failure prevented residents from using their call buttons and making their needs known and having their needs met. Cross reference F558 Findings 1. Review of admission Record indicated Resident 55 (R55)was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Cognitive ( process of thinking) Communication Deficit (difficulties in communication stemming from impairments in cognitive functions like attention, memory, or problem-solving, rather than a primary language or speech problem), Functional Quadriplegia (the complete inability to move due to severe disability or frailty, but without physical injury or damage to the brain or spinal cord), and Metabolic Encephalopathy (a condition where the brain does not function properly). Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized, federally mandated assessment tool used in nursing homes)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to keep one resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) free from cockroaches. This failure had the potential to affect the health of the three residents who reside in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Findings: A review of the admission Record for Resident 258 (R258) dated 1/22/25 indicated R258 was admitted for diagnoses which included: Infection of sacrococcygeal region (the region at the base of the spine, encompassing the sacrum (bone of the lower back) and coccyx (tailbone)), Skin Graft failure (the transplanted skin tissue fails to survive and integrate with the recipient site), Aneurysm of ascending aorta(a bulge or widening of the ascending aorta, the part of the aorta that carries blood from the heart to the head and arms). A record review of Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized, federally mandated assessment tool used in nursing homes) Section C dated 2/11/25 indicated Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a standardized assessment tool used to screen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of staff to resident abuse for one of two residents (Resident 2) when reviewed for Resident Abuse. This failure had the potential for all resident's to be at risk of staff to resident abuse. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (progressive memory loss), with agitation, per the facility ' s admission Record. On 2/21/25, Resident 2 ' s clinical record was reviewed: According to the Minimum Data Set, (MDS-a clinical assessment tool), Resident 2 had a cognitive score of 9, indicating cognition was moderately impaired. According to the Functional Abilities section, Resident 2 could ambulate without any assistive devices. According to the facilities SBAR (Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation communication tool used between staff members about a resident's change in condition), Communication Form, dated 1/31/25 at 10 A.M., Patient sustained a skin tear to right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess, document, and transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS-a clinical assessment tool), information to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS-A federal agency that oversees health insurance) regarding the preferred language for one of two residents (Resident 1), when reviewed for MDS Assessments As a result, CMS was uninformed of Resident 3 ' s language preference. Findings: Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Parkinson ' s disease, (a progressive neurological disorder that affects movement, balance, and other bodily functions), per the facility ' s admission Record. An observation was conducted of Resident 1 in her room on 2/21/25 at 10:52 A.M. Resident 1 was in bed, with the head of the bed slightly elevated. Resident 1 padded her mattress and stated No bueno, .mucho delore, no bueno (No good . much pain, no good). Resident 1 did not understand questions in English and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-29 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff competently carried out the functions of the food and nutrition services department when: 1. A Dietary Aide (DA 1) dishwasher was unable to determine the correct wash, rinse and sanitizing temperatures and process. 2. A [NAME] (CK 2) did not prepare the beef roast correctly using the cool down process for cooking hot foods. These failures had the potential to expose dishes to to unsanitary practices and contaminate the food which could result in food borne illness among all residents who consume food from the kitchen. The facility census was 294. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 3/26/24 at 8:10 AM, a concurrent interview with the Dishwasher, Dietary Aide (DA 1), and record review of the dish machine log was conducted. The log indicated 3/25/24 Dinner: wash-200, rinse-200, and sanitizer-100 ppm (parts per million) .3/26/24 Breakfast: wash- 190, rinse- 150, and sanitizer- 100 ppm . DA 1 stated he wrote the values for 3/26/24 and initialed them. DA 1 stated he couldn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen for food preparation tools and food storage methods, according to standards of practice and facility policy when: 1. Three (3) floor sink drains were full of dirt, food debris, trash, and black grime; and one floor sink drain was uncovered. 2. A Kitchen reach-in refrigerator with 7 full cases of 4-ounce Ready shake chocolate flavor milkshakes (75 milkshakes per case), and 3 cases with 10 Ready shakes of vanilla flavor, and the quart of lactaid milk with a broken thermometer. 3. Six measurement scoops, three dome lids, 1 metal egg slicer, and were found with brown and black grime and food debris on them after they were washed and stored as clean in drawers. 4. Seven cutting boards (3 green, 1 blue, 1 tan, 1 yellow, and 1 white) were found visibly worn with multiple tears and discolorations. 5. Four Resident nourishment refrigerators on nursing units had expired food items inside with visible dirt and sticky grime on the inside of the doors.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident 548's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, a nursing assessment used in nursing homes) section C, Cognitive Patterns dated 3/5/24 indicated Resident 548 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs, a test to determine cognitive levels in residents) score of 10, which indicates moderately impaired cognition. Review of MDS section GG, Functional Abilities and Goals dated 3/5/24 indicated that Resident 548 needed supervision or touch assistance for the categories of oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower/bath self and personal hygiene. On 3/26/24 at 10:50 A.M., during initial pooling of residents, an observation of Resident 548's room and interview with Resident 548 was conducted. Resident 548's sink was observed to have a handwritten sign that read DON'T USE. Resident 548's sink was separate from the enclosed bathroom and was the only sink in the room. Resident 548 stated that the sink had not been working since he had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility did not ensure the kitchen was free of flies and gnats. This failure had the potential to affect residents' health through food contamination and food borne illness. The facility census was 294. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour observation on 3/26/2024 at 8:00 A.M., few flies were seen flying all over the kitchen. The kitchen appeared to be very dirty with food debris, hard crusty debris, grimy sticky black substance on the equipment. During an observation on 3/27/24 at 10:36 AM on the second floor- north nursing station, there were more than five fruit flies seen flying in the air near the resident refrigerator area. The fruit flies were verified by LN 25. During an observation and interview on 3/27/2024 at 11:02 A.M. at the third-floor resident's refrigerator with licensed nurse LN 21, LN 21 stated housekeeping cleaned the resident's refrigerator two times a week. A small dead black roach was found inside the freezer door of the refrigerator. LN 21 confirmed there was a dead roach insect inside the freezer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for one of 35 residents (548) when the resident's bathroom sink was left nonfunctioning for at least one week. This deficient practice created an environment that was not homelike for one resident. Cross reference F880. FINDINGS: Review of Resident 548's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, a nursing assessment used in nursing homes) section C, Cognitive Patterns dated 3/5/24 indicated Resident 548 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs, a test to determine cognitive levels in residents) score of 10, which indicates moderately impaired cognition. Review of MDS section GG, Functional Abilities and Goals dated 3/5/24 indicated that Resident 548 needed supervision or touch assistance for the categories of oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower/bath self and personal hygiene. On 3/26/24 at 10:50 A.M., during initial pooling of residents, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents sampled for dialysis (157) had a care plan developed for the dialysis access of an AV fistula (arteriovenous fistula is a surgical connection between an artery and a vein) to ensure the AV fistula was assessed for thrill (thrill or buzz is like a vibration caused by blood flowing through the fistula ) and bruit (Bruit is a rumbling or swooshing sound) to determine the AV fistula was functional, or to determine when the post dialysis AV fistula dressing was to be removed. As a result, and issue with the residents AV fistula would not be identified timely to receive immediate care. Findings: Resident 157 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included diabetes and renal failure requiring dialysis. On 3/27/24, Resident 157's clinical record was reviewed the only care plan related to dialysis for Resident 15's AV fistula contained only approaches related to the assessment of the signs and symptoms of infection, to be monitored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not develop patient centered care plans for 2 of 52 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident 32 and 154). These failures had the potential for the residents to not receive care and services specific to the residents' needs. Findings: 1.Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including left hand contracture (shortening of muscles and tendons, often leading to permanent deformity and stiffening of joints) according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation and interview on 3/26/24, at 9:20 A.M. with Resident 32, Resident 32 was in bed with a splint on her left hand. Resident 32 stated she could not move her left thumb. Resident 32's legs were exposed and both feet were observed to have foot drop (difficulty lifting the front part of foot). Resident 32 was able to raise both legs but were unable to bend her feet towards Resident 32's head. During an interview and concurrent record review on 3/29/24, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate nutritional parameters were maintained for a resident, Resident 60, with a severe weight loss of 18.4% in six months. This failure had the potential to result in additional unintentional weight loss and loss of lean body mass, which could lead to further nutrition decline for Resident 60. Findings: According to an American Family Physician article titled Evaluating and Treating Unintentional Weight Loss in the Elderly, .Elderly patients with unintentional weight loss are at higher risk for infection, depression and death. [NAME], 2002; 65: pp. 640-650. According to the facility's admission Record dated 3/28/24, Resident 60 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (kidney failure), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type 2 diabetes mellitus (inability to manage blood sugar), and Vitamin D deficiency (low blood levels of vitamin D). During a record review of the facility's Weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident 154) received Trauma Informed Care (TIC- an intervention and organizational approach that focuses on how trauma may affect an individual's life and his or her response to behavioral health). This failure resulted in the facility's inability to identify possible triggers that could result in re-traumatization (the reactivation of trauma symptoms via thoughts, memories, or feelings related to the past torture experience). Findings: Resident 154 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event) according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation on 3/27/24, at 10:14 A.M., Resident 154 was in bed with eyes closed. Resident 154's assigned certified nurse assistant (CNA 41) was interviewed on 3/27/24, at 10: 22 A.M. CNA 41 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure they provided the minimum number of sufficient staff or PPD (PPD stand for Per Patient Day, and calculations are determined by the number of residents in a skilled nursing facility and the number of clinical staff.) the PPD minimums for Skilled nursing facilities in California were ( 3.5 DHPPD staffing requirement, of which 2.4 hours per patient day must be performed by CNAs) to be able to provide services within the facility. As a result, residents may not have gotten the care they deserve. Findings: On 3/28/24, the posted and actual staffing was reviewed from 3/12/24 to 3/28/24. There was a single staffing posting made throughout the facility the posting included the entire building and was posted on the first-floor reception desk. According to the DSD the projected staffing was calculated daily and posted, the posting was not modified if the staffing numbers changed throughout the day. The posting should have been modified as needed to accurately reflect the numbers of staff providing care. The actual PPD is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three licensed nurses (LN 12) was assessed for competency (a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully) to perform medication administration to residents. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility could not ensure medications were accurately and safely provided to residents. Cross reference F759. Findings: On 3/28/24 at 9:07 A.M., an observation of medication administration was conducted with LN 12. During the medication administration of a resident (Resident 122), LN 12 failed to administer three physician ordered medications. LN 12 also administered an incorrect amount of medication to Resident 122. On 3/29/24 at 8 A.M., an interview was conducted with the director of nursing (DON). The DON stated it was his expectation that residents were administered all their medications correctly and as ordered by the physician. The DON stated LN 12's medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure they posted the actual daily staffing, when they only posted the projected staffing. As a result, residetns and visitors would not know what staff were woking. Findings: On 3/28/24, the posted and actual staffing was reviewed from 3/12/24 to 3/28/24. There was a single staffing posting made throughout the facility the posting included the entire building and was posted on the first-floor reception desk. According to the DSD the projected staffing was calculated daily and posted the posting was not modified if the staffing numbers changed throughout the day. The posting should have been modified as needed to accurately reflect the numbers of staff providing care.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication orders for two of 35 sampled residents (Resident 60 and Resident 64) were carried out as ordered. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 60 and Resident 64's health and safety. Findings: 1. Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD - kidney failure) and diabetes mellitus (DM - too much sugar in the blood) according to the facesheet. A review of Resident 60's physician's orders, dated 3/25/24, indicated Resident 60 was to receive Lantus (a long-acting man-made-insulin used to control high blood sugar) 20 units subcutaneouly (under the skin) every morning. A review of Resident 60's medication administration record (MAR) for March 2024 indicated insulin glargine (lantus insulin) 20 units was not given on 3/8, 3/18, 3/20, and 3/27/24. The MAR indicated that the insulin was not given because Resident out to dialysis. A review of Resident 60's nursing progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 5 residents sampled for unnecessary drugs (181, 215), had not been put on Trazodone for a non-FDA approved indication, which resulted in this medication becoming an unnecessary drug for 2 Residents, as this medication had been prescribed without an adequate (FDA approved) indication. This deficient practice resulted in this resident receiving Trazodone for a clinical indication, which had not been FDA approved, which could have caused this resident harm. Findings: a. Resident 181's clinical record was reviewed on 3/28/24. Resident 181 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis including cognitive impairment per the Record of Admission. A review of the physician's order for Trazodone 50mg give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for depression AEB (as exhibited by) inability to sleep, dated 12/1/18, and started on 5/1/19, revealed that this medication had been prescribed to treat this resident's inability to sleep, not depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. The facility's medication error rate was 12.5 percent. Four (4) medication errors were observed, a total of 32 opportunities, during the medication administration process for one of seven randomly observed residents (Resident 122). As a result, the facility could not ensure medications were correctly administered to all residents. Cross reference F726. Findings: A review of Resident 122's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dorsalgia (back pain). On 3/28/24 at 9:07 A.M., an observation of medication administration was conducted with licensed nurse (LN) 12. LN 12 asked Resident 122 if she was having any pain or muscle spasms. Resident 122 replied, No. LN 12 then prepared and administered the following medications to Resident 122: - carvedilol 12.5 mg (heart medication) - escitalopram 10 mg (antidepressant) -multivitamin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the Pureed diet menu was followed as printed. This failure had the potential to alter the nutritional value of the pureed meals, which could decrease the food intake and compromise the nutrition status of 30 residents on a pureed diet. The facility census was 294. Findings: During a review of the facility's Therapeutic Menu Spreadsheet titled Cooks Spreadsheet Spring Cycle Menus Week 4 Tuesday, 3/26/24, the regular entrée was 3 ounces roast turkey, 1/3 cup Bread dressing, ½ cup Three bean salad, 1/3 cup Seasoned peas, 1/3 cup vanilla mousse chocolate chip garnish, milk- 4 ounces. The Pureed diet indicated ½ cup of pureed Roast turkey, 1/3 cup pureed Bread dressing, ½ cup pureed Three bean salad, 1/3 cup pureed vanilla mousse and no chocolate chip garnish. During a joint observation and interview on 3/26/2024 at 12:21 P.M. in the 4th floor dining room, A Dietary Aide (DA 2) was scooping portions of the lunch meal on plates for the meal service. DA 2 served mashed potatoes to the residents on a Pureed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility did not ensure essential kitchen equipment, including the dish machine thermometer gauges, a stove range handles, and three (3) mobile tray line stations were maintained to operate at their full capacity. This failure had the potential to directly affect residents and staff's safety in the facility. Facility census was 294. Findings 1. Dish machine thermometer gauges worn and cloudy. During the initial kitchen tour on 3/26/24 at 8:15 AM, a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Aide (DA 1) Dishwasher was conducted. The dish machine thermometer gauges were worn and cloudy inside which made the numbers blurry and difficulty to view. DA 1 stated he had trouble estimating what the correct wash temperature was because of the blurry temperature gauges. The CDM acknowledged the cloudy temperature gauges on the dish machine and stated they needed to be repaired. During an interview on 3/29/2024 at 10:31 A.M., with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD sated he expected the dish machine temperature sanitizer and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure one of 35 residents (Resident 162) had a call light that was consistently working. As a result, Resident 162 was at risk of not getting her needs addressed timely which could potentially result in injury and falls. Findings: Resident 162 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (blood supply to part of brain is blocked causing damage to brain cells) per the facesheet. A review of Resident 162's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 1/20/24, indicated that Resident 162 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - used to screen and identify the mental condition of residents) score of 15 (cognitively intact). An observation and interview of Resident 162, while in her room, was conducted on 3/27/24 at 9:29 A.M. Resident 162 sat in her wheelchair next to the resident's bed. The call light wall plate was loose. Resident 162 stated the call light did not work. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately access the hearing and vision deficits for one of seven residents (Resident 1), on admission for the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a clinical assessment tool) required for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) coding and reviewed for Resident Assessment. As a result, the MDS submitted to CMS did not accurately portray Resident 1 ' s current health status. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection with resistance to multiple antimicrobial drugs (commonly used drugs to treat infections), per the admission Record. On 1/11/24, Resident 1 ' s clinical record was reviewed: According to the admission Nurses Notes, dated 12/26/23 at 8:33 P.M., Resident 1 had bilateral (both eyes) blindness, was hearing impaired and used bilateral hearing aids. According to the care plan, titled Legally blind, dated 1/2/24, listed interventions of 1:1 room visits to promote socialization and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices when: 1. A urinary catheter bag was in contact with the floor for one of two residents, (Resident 4). 2. An ice scoop was improperly stored and therefore exposed to germs. 3. One blood pressure cuff was used on patients without being properly disinfected, (Resident 5 and Resident 6). As a result, there was the potential of infections to be transmitted to residents. Findings: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included retention of urine, (an inability to urinate), per the facility ' s admission Record. On 1/11/24 at 10:56 A.M., an observation was conducted from the hallway of Resident 4 ' s room. Resident 4 was in bed, with the bed in a low position. A urinary catheter collection bag, covered with a blue dignity bag was lying flat on the floor. On 1/11/24 at 11:01 A.M., an observation and interview were conducted with certified nurse assistant (CNA 1) outside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe discharge and transition for 1 of 2 sampled residents (1). As a result, Resident 1 was hospitalized within three days of discharge from the facility. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interfere with doing everyday activities), per the facility's Face Sheet. A review of Resident 1's clinical record was conducted. Per the History and Physical Examination, dated 6/21/23, The physician documented that Resident 1 had a grave disability (unable to provide for their basic needs for food, clothing, or shelter due to a mental disorder). Per the Progress Notes, dated 9/21/23, the Social Service Assistant (SSA) documented that Resident 1 wanted to be discharged from the facility to be homeless. The staff booked a three-night stay at a motel and discharged Resident 1 from the facility at 3:30 P.M. On 10/4/23 at 3:45 P.M., an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide activities to one of six units (total of 35 Residents), in the secured unit, as posted on the unit's activity schedule. This failure had the potential to decrease residents' cognitive awareness and socialization. Findings: On 4/18/22 at 10:27 A.M., during initial tour, an interview was conducted with Resident 83 in his room. Resident 83 stated there was nothing to do but smoke, and he would like to color or do something. On 4/18/22 at 2:20 P.M., a TV was opposite the nurse's station in the secured unit which was playing 50's and 60's music. Five residents were sitting in chairs and wheelchairs opposite the TV playing music. A large activity calendar was on the wall. The activities listed for the afternoon of 4/18/22 were: 2 P.M. Sing-Along, 2:30 P.M. was Chew & Chat, 3 P.M. was Balloon Ball. On 4/18/22 at 3:16 P.M., no activities were being lead and no balloons were present. The TV continued playing 50's and 60's music. On 4/18/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label, date, and seal foods in one of two refrigerators (walk-in refrigerator) and, one of one storage rooms. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses to residents. Findings: On 4/18/22 at 8:06 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with KA 1, during initial tour of the walk-in refrigerator. A ¼ turkey roast was in a metal tray on a shelf, wrapped in cellophane. The turkey roast was not labeled or dated to indicate when it was placed in the refrigerator. Next to the turkey roast was another metal pan with slices of turkey. The cellophane covering the metal pan was caved in and meat/gravy juices were floating on top of the cellophane cover. No label or date was found on the cellophane or on the metal pan to indicate when the sliced turkey was placed in the refrigerator. A serving tray was on a shelf which contained a total of 19 peanut butter/jelly sandwiches and cheese sandwiches. The sandwiches were cut in half and wrapped in cellophane. No labels or dates were on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow safe infection control practices when: 1. Staff did not perform hand hygiene while passing meal trays to residents; 2. Smoking aprons were not disinfected after use; and 3. A urinary catheter bag was in contact with the floor. These failures had the potential for cross contamination of pathogens (microorganism that can cause disease). Findings: 1. On 4/19/22 at 11:37 A.M., an observation was conducted while staff were passing lunch meal trays to residents in the secured unit. All alcohol based hand rub (ABHR-a disinfectant solution) dispensers were mounted on the walls outside every third room. CNA 1 was observed exiting a resident room after delivering a lunch tray and did not use ABHR, to disinfect his hands. CNA 1 returned to the food cart and removed another lunch tray without performing hand hygiene. CNA 1 set the lunch tray on a bedside table for a male resident sitting in the hallway next to the nurse's station. CNA 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool), was developed and transmitted to the CMS system, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2), reviewed for MDS accuracy. This failure resulted in Resident 2's discharge status not being communicated to CMS as required. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. On 4/21/22 at 2:39 P.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the MDSN 26. The MDSN 26 reviewed Resident 2's Progress Notes, dated 12/09/21, which indicated the resident left the facility Against Medical Advice (AMA) and signed the AMA form. The MDSN 26 stated the discharge MDS was not developed and transmitted to CMS. The MDSN 26 stated the facility was supposed to follow the MDS guidelines, which meant the discharge MDS should have been developed and transmitted within 14 days after leaving AMA. Per the facility's policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for: 1. One of 37 residents (Resident 5) and one of three unsampled residents (Resident 167) reviewed for wandering (a confused person who is in search of someone, or something); and 2. One of 37 residents with weight loss (Resident 122). These failures resulted in wandering behaviors and weight loss not being recognized and addressed. Findings: 1a. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration), per the facility's admission Record. On 4/18/22 at 10:21 A.M., and at 2:48 P.M., Resident 5 was observed entering and exiting other male and female resident rooms without staff stopping or redirecting her. On 4/18/22, Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed: The MDS, a cognitive assessment, dated 3/30/22, indicated 0, (range 0-15), which meant severe cognitive impairment. The Behavior Assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent suprapubic catheter (tube used to drain urine from the bladder) care to one of two residents (Resident 65), sampled for urinary catheter care. As a result, there was a potential for infection and suprapubic catheter blockage. Findings: Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (lacking bladder control), per the facility's admission Record. On 4/21/22, at 9:39 A.M., a joint interview and record review was conducted with LN 21. According to Resident 65's Order Summary Report, dated 10/28/21, .Provide suprapubic catheter care Q (every) shift, & PRN (as needed) if soiled or dislodged . According to Resident 65's Order Summary Report, dated 4/30/21, .SUPRAPUBIC CATHETER .MONITOR PLACEMENT & PATENCY (without blockage) DURING & AFTER CARE every shift . According to Resident 65's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated 4/2022, indicated, Provide suprapubic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff followed physician orders for the amount of feeding administered to two of two residents (47, 117) reviewed for tube feeding (provision of nutrition through a tube into the stomach). As a result, there was potential the residents did not receive the required nutrition. Findings: 1.Resident 47 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes (a disorder with high blood sugar) per the facility's admission Record. On 4/18/22 at 8:38 A.M., an observation of Resident 47 was conducted. There was a tube feeding connected to the resident. The tube feeding bag was dated 4/17/22 and time started at 2:30 P.M. The tube feeding pump was noted to be off and approximately 900 milliliters (ml) of solution was left in the 1500 ml volume bag. A record review was conducted. The physician order dated 3/14/22 indicated for Resident 47's tube feeding to run at 45 ml/hr for 20 hours to provide 900 ml total…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain medication for one of one resident (Resident 246) reviewed for pain management. As a result, Resident 246's pain was not addresed or relieved. Findings: Resident 246 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include chronic pain syndrome, polyneuropathy (damage or disease of nerves causing pain), osteoarthritis (wear and tear of joints causing pain), polyosteoarthritis (inflammation of one or more joints causing pain), per the facility's admission Record. On 4/18/22 at 10:42 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 246. Resident 246 stated last night, he asked for pain medication and he had to wait until the licensed nurse came. Resident 246 stated when one of the licensed nurse, LN 16 finally showed up, the licensed nurse walked away without giving the pain medication and never returned with the pain medication. On 4/21/22, Resident 246's record was reviewed. According to the physician History and Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not assess and evaluate the need for psychotropic drugs (affects the brain and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) for one of five residents (Resident 477) reviewed for psychotropic medication. This resulted in Resident 477 having received two potentially unnecessary psychotropic medications . Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 477 was admitted on [DATE] with dementia (impaired mental capacity), depression, and history of schizophrenia (a type of mental illness). Resident 477 records were reviewed on 4/18/22. Per the physician's order listed on the MAR, dated April 2022, Resident 477 received a psychotropic drug (risperidone) for psychosis (hallucinations and disorganized thinking) as evidenced by disorganized speech, but the supporting clinical assessment was absent. Per the physician's orders, Resident 477 received a psychotropic drug (mirtazapine) for depression but the supporting clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. The facility's medication error rate was 24.32 percent. Nine medication errors were observed, a total of 37 opportunities, during the medication administration process for one of six randomly observed residents (Resident 47). Findings: On 4/20/22 at 9:45 A.M., an observation of medication administration was conducted with LN 6. LN 6 prepared and administered the medications to Resident 47 via the gastrostomy tube (G-tube-a surgically-placed device for direct access to the stomach). The medications included digoxin (a heart failure medicine), divalproex (anticonvulsant), docusate sodium (a stool softener), eliquis (a blood thinner), ferrous sulfate (a medication to treat iron deficiency), lansoprazole (a medication to treat high levels of stomach acid), levocarnitine (a dietary supplement), metoprolol (a blood pressure medication), and multivitamins. A review of Resident 47's records was conducted. The physician order dated 8/13/21 indicated to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medications were administered in accordance with the physician's order for two of six randomly observed residents (Resident 47, 180) during a medication administration process when: 1. The medications were administered via the wrong route and 2. The wrong dose was administered. As a result, there was a potential the prescribed medications were ineffective. Findings: 1. Resident 47 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes (a disorder with high blood sugar) per the facility's admission Record. On 4/20/22 at 9:45 A.M., an observation of medication administration was conducted with LN 6. LN 6 prepared and administered the medications to Resident 47 via the gastrostomy tube (G-tube- a surgically placed device for direct access to the stomach). The medications included digoxin (a heart failure medicine), divalproex (anticonvulsant), docusate sodium (a stool softener), Eliquis (a blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$122,210 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $122,210 — penalty dated 2026-02-17
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MICHLIN, BERNARD | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 04/01/2019 |
| GRAF, ZACHARY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 04/01/2024 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555431. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.