Napa Post Acute
705 Trancas St., Napa, CA 94558 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (707) 255-6060 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $173,323 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-07)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 24.6% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.5% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.10 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.92 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 182 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 75.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.8%CMS range 40.7–54.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.9%CMS range 5.9–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 75.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 71.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 75.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.9%CMS range 5.2–14.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program and a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections, including establishing policies and procedures, when A. facility staff could not prevent a C-Diff (C. diff- a highly contagious bacteria that causes severe diarrhea) outbreak, B. facility did not follow water management requirements for Legionella (a type of bacteria naturally found in freshwater, that becomes a health concern when it grows in man-made water systems; people get sick (severe pneumonia) by inhaling mist that contains the bacteria), and C. and open sewage pipe was observed in a communal shower room which also stored medical equipment.These failures had the potential to cause the spread of infection among a vulnerable resident population and resulted in harm to at least 8 residents who were confirmed positive for C. Diff. between 11/12/25 and 1/24/26, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-02-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 19) sampled for pain management received professional treatment when Licensed Nurse S did not assess, evaluate, treat, or reassess Resident 19's migraine pain.This failure resulted in persistent migraine pain for Resident 19 and affected her overall well-being. A review of Resident 19's admission record indicated she was admitted in 08/2024 with diagnoses of Chronic pain (persistent pain lasting longer than 3-6 months), a burn wound to her left thigh, and Migraine with Aura (severe headaches with visual disturbance such as zig-zag lines, flashing lights or blind spots).A review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 11/17/25 indicated no cognitive impairment.A review of Resident 19's Care Plan last revised 12/15/25 indicated interventions to assess pain at least every shift and as indicated and administer medications as ordered to attain a tolerable pain level per resident report.A review of Resident 19's Physician Order Summary dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility staff were aware that Resident 1 attempted to leave the facility a few hours after his admission and did not develop and implement interventions to prevent Resident 1 from leaving the facility unsupervised. This failure resulted to Resident 1 leaving the facility unnoticed few hours after midnight and ended at the hospital with Hypothermia (a medical emergency that occurs when your body loses heat faster than it can produce heat, causing a dangerously low body temperature) and Traumatic (relating to or denoting physical injury) hematoma (occurs when a blood vessel ruptures and blood collects in the area) of left elbow. Findings: During a telephone interview with Family Member A on 11/17/23 a 2:38 p.m., Family Member A stated he received a call from the facility on Sunday 11/12/23 at 3 a.m. to inform him that Resident 1 was missing. Family Member A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2023-09-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled resident's (Resident 1) maintained adequate hydration (fluid status in the body) and nutrition (food intake) during his approximate 3.5 week stay at the facility. Resident 1 was transferred to the facility from Hospital 1 (approximately 90 miles North of the facility) after having his right toe amputated (removed) and his plan of care included post-surgical (after surgery) rehabilitation at the facility, with an ultimate goal of returning home to his wife. Upon admission to the facility, Resident 1 required the assistance of staff for eating and drinking and nursing staff documented he was at risk for dehydration and malnutrition. Although Resident 1 was a Full Code (directs a patient's medical care regarding life-sustaining interventions; full support): 1) Nursing staff and the Registered Dietitian (RD) did not notify Resident 1's physician (Physician F), Nurse Practitioner (NP G), or family when he had a 30.8 (31) pound weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the dignity of two of six sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3) when they were not assisted with toileting timely. This failure caused both Resident 2 and Resident 3 to be left in bedding soaked in urine for over an hour and caused Resident 2 to feel dirty and gross.During an observation and concurrent interview on 5/20/26 at 11 a.m., Resident 2 was sitting in bed with her husband seated at her bedside. Resident 2 stated she had long waits for call light response. Resident 2 stated every evening she would sit for hours in a wet bed. Resident 2's husband verified he had witnessed this. Resident 2 stated she could not say how long she had to sit in a wet bed, but it was long enough that the urine on the sheets dried and she smelled like urine. Resident 2 stated it made her feel dirty and gross. During an observation and concurrent interview on 5/20/26 at 11:47 a.m., Resident 3 was in a wheelchair at Resident 4's bedside. Resident 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement the care plan of one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when nurses did not document pain assessments for three shifts during Resident 1's first two days of admission. This failure caused Resident 1 to feel panicked when her pain became out of control.During a phone interview on 5/20/26 at 11:03 a.m., Family Member (FM) stated Resident 1 was in quite a bit of pain during Resident 1's first day at the facility. FM stated that Resident 1 had suffered multiple fractures (broken bones) just three days prior to her admission to the facility, two in her spine and one in her pelvis. FM stated Resident 1 was on round-the-clock pain medications when she was at the hospital, taking oxycodone (a narcotic pain medication) every six hours. FM stated when Resident 1 was transferred to the facility from the hospital she did not receive any pain medication her first day and this caused Resident 1 a lot of panic because her pain was getting out of hand. FM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not initiate the process to replace or reimburse missing dentures for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after they were lost at the facility, and instead, filed a claim with Resident 1's own dental insurance company for replacement, rather than assuming financial responsibility.This failure may have contributed to Resident 1 experiencing a weight loss of over nine pounds over the past month, as well as feelings of discomfort regarding dental status leading her to wear a mask. In addition, this had the potential to result in dental insurance fraud.A review of Resident 1's admission Record (facility demographic) indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses which included ataxia (lack of muscle coordination), diabetes mellitus (chronic medical condition characterized by high levels of glucose [sugar] in the blood) and feeding difficulties. This document also indicated Family Member XX was Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-17 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee failed to identify multiple quality of care issues. This failure resulted in a systemic breakdown of the infection control and prevention program which potentially could have led to harm of vulnerable residents, and other poor outcomes for residents in the care of the facility.During an interview on 2/12/26 at 2:25 p.m., the Administrator stated the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met monthly. The Administrator stated the QAPI committee developed performance improvement projects based on information they got from department heads, grievances, the resident council, monthly all-staff meetings, and an anonymous suggestion box. The Administrator stated QAPI was the umbrella for all of those sources of information so if something was an ongoing struggle then it would go to QAPI for monitoring. The Administrator stated a performance improvement project for infection prevention was started on 2/3/26, the day after the survey began. The Administrator verified no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident Rights were honored when:Dignity and respect for residents was not provided when residents complained staff were observed being disrespectful, rude and unprofessional.Access to call lights for assistance and emergencies was not available when the call lights of three resident (Resident 15, Resident 24, and Resident 110) were not within reach on multiple observations.Access to visitors was denied to one resident (Resident 16) when she requested a visit from her daughter and the facility prevented her daughter visitation.Four out of five sampled residents (Resident 39, Resident 41, Resident 42, and Resident 69) were not treated with dignity and respect when staff were overheard speaking in a foreign language throughout the facility.These failures prevented the residents their right to safety, a dignified existence, self-determination, communication with and access to persons and services inside the facility, and residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, sanitary, homelike environment when: Patient care areas and laundry processing were observed to have broken and cracked floor tiles, exposed and unsealed medication cart work surfaces, unsealed cement on floors, exposed plaster, rusty and non-functioning equipment, and unsealed woodwork.These failures resulted in an environment for residents and staff that did not appear homelike, increased the risk of cross contamination and the spread of contagious disease.Cross Reference F880Findings: During an observation on 2/9/26 at 10:30 a.m. the floors and door jambs in resident rooms 56, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 were observed to have chipped and cracked floor tiles, chipped paint on the doors and door jambs. The hand-washing sink in the east nursing station was observed to have exposed and damaged plaster in the entire area behind the faucet. The corner wall of the east nursing station where staff exited and entered the station was observed to have exposed plaster on the entire area around the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of five residents sampled for medication review from chemical restraint when Resident 4 had lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) ordered as needed without a frequency, duration, or monitoring for target symptoms. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 4 receiving an anti-anxiety medication unnecessarily, which can cause sedation, dizziness, weakness, and unsteadiness. During a record review on 2/11/26 at 8:08 a.m., review of Resident 4's face sheet revealed an admission date of 2/9/24, age over [AGE] years old, and medical diagnoses that included cerebral infarct (a blockage in a blood vessel to the brain), major depressive disorder in full remission, and dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident 4's physician orders revealed an active order dated 1/28/26 for lorazepam 1 mg (milligram) PRN (pro re [NAME], Latin for as needed) for anxiety manifested by inability to relax. The order did not include a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents sampled for nutrition (Resident 19) Care Plan was evaluated and revised to include new means by which to monitor her weight after Resident 19 had refused to have her weight measured using the Hoyer Lift (a mechanical device used to lift and/or transfer a person) for 7 months.This failure caused the facility to be unable to properly assess a vulnerable resident, Resident 19, for significant weight loss, under nutrition, and worsening health status.A review of Resident 19's admission record indicated she was admitted in 08/2024 with diagnoses of Chronic pain (persistent pain lasting longer than 3-6 months) and a large burn wound to her left thigh.A review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) indicated she had no cognitive impairment.A review of Resident 19's weight measurements indicated her last weight was obtained on 7/1/25 and was 135.6 lbs.A review of Resident 19's Care Plan indicated Resident 19 was at risk for weight fluctuations and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-17 · tag F0841 — patternDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective participation and oversight of resident medical care by Physician R when,The infection Prevention and Control Program for a census of 116 was not provided oversight by Physician R for antibiotic stewardship and monitoring of infectious diseases in the facility designed to slow and prevent the spread of Clostridium Difficile (C. diff- a highly contagious bacteria that causes severe diarrhea), and prevention of water borne illness related to positive Legionella (a type of bacteria found in water that causes Legionnaires Disease a severe pneumonia) results.(Cross reference F 880).Physician R did not ensure resident care policies for informed consent were implemented according to facility policy for two of five residents (Resident 10 and Resident 12) sampled for psychotropic medications, andPhysician R did not ensure adequate diagnostic evaluation for a new diagnosis of Schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure advanced knowledge and approval of ongoing treatment with psychotropic medications ( any medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior) for two of five sampled residents ( Resident 10 and Resident 12) for unnecessary medications when resident representatives did not recall contact from the facility and the informed consent ( a document that confirms residents or resident representatives were informed on the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a medical intervention) forms were not signed nor was verbal consent documented.This failure prevented the resident's representative's from participating in their right to determine treatment interventions for Resident 10 and Resident 12.A review of Resident 10's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility in 12/2022 with diagnoses of Dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and Major Depressive Disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, one of two residents sampled for tube feeding (Resident 140), who was at risk for constipation, had no bowel movement (BM) for five days and was not given bowel care medications as indicated on the care plan. This failure contributed to Resident 140 developing a fecal impaction (a severe, solid, or hard mass of stool stuck in the rectum or colon, typically resulting from chronic, untreated constipation).During an electronic medical record (eMR) review on 2/3/26 at 3:30 p.m., Resident 140's face sheet indicated an admission date of 1/9/26, age in his 70s, and medical diagnoses that include traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a type of bleeding near the brain that can happen after a head injury), broken facial bones, aphasia (language disorder resulting from brain damage that impairs speaking, writing, reading, and comprehension while leaving intelligence intact), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and a gastrostomy (the surgical creation of an opening (stoma) into the stomach to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring for one out of two sampled Residents (Sampled Resident 60) when Resident 60 left the facility unnoticed by staff (eloped) on 12/27/25.This failure contributed to Resident 60 being found outside the facility by the police and had the potential to lead to injuries for Resident 60. Review of Resident 60's medical record document titled admission RECORD, indicated he was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included Heart Disease, Encounter for Aftercare Following Surgery on the Circulatory System, Muscle Weakness, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, and Unspecified Psychosis (A person's thoughts and perceptions are disrupted and they may have difficulty recognizing what is real and what is not.).During an observation on 2/2/26 at 9 a.m., the front doors of the facility faced north onto a busy street with consistent traffic.During an interview with Resident 60's Public Guardian I (A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of one resident's sampled for ostomy care( a surgical opening in the abdomen that redirects waste outside the body into a wearable pouch system) ( Resident 110), received care according to professional standards of practice when Licensed Nurse S disregarded Resident 110's verbal and non-verbal signs of pain with old appliance removal, did not follow the correct procedure for appliance change to minimize skin exposure to feces and urine, and did not notify the supervisor of any abnormal findings. This failure caused Resident 110 to have pain, discomfort, and had the potential to contribute to further skin breakdown around his stoma(a surgically created opening in the abdomen that diverts stool flow). A review of Resident 110's admission record indicated he was admitted in 09/2024 with left sided hemiparesis (a neurological condition characterized by weakness on one side of the body affecting the arm, leg, and trunk) after a stroke, chronic pain, and had an ostomy.A review of Residents 110's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly maintain the residents' food refrigerator for a census of 116 when food items were not properly labeled.This failure had the potential to result in residents consuming contaminated food, increasing the risk of foodborne illness and adverse health outcomes.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/2/26 at 9:40 a.m., with the Dietary Services Manager (DSM), the freezer unit of the resident refrigerator contained one opened 16 oz container of Dean's French Onion Dip and two (8-pack) unopened packages of El Monterey Beef and Bean Chimichangas the DSM stated, he did not see any identifying labels on the french onion dip container or either of the chimichanga packages. During an interview on 2/12/26 at 10:27 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated she expected items placed in the resident refrigerator were labeled properly with dates and who the item belonged to, otherwise resident food could be shared with another resident if not properly labeled. The DON also stated she would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not securely attach the bed rails to the bedframe for one of seven residents who use bed rails, (Resident 105.) Resident 105's bed rails were loose and wobbly, easily swinging away from the bed. Resident 105 stated she did not feel safe using the bed rails for repositioning or getting in and out of bed and stated she almost fell to the floor.During an interview and concurrent observations on 02/09/2026 at 4:26 p.m., in Resident 105's room, Resident 105 reported that broken bed rails nearly caused a fall while repositioning. She stated, the rail just fell down and demonstrated how the left rail could move side to side, creating a 2 to 3-inch gap between the mattress and rail . The surveyor confirmed the rail could swing towards the middle of the room, forming a large gap which posed a fall risk. The right bed rail was also loose and could be pushed away from the bed towards the wall.During an interview and concurrent observations on 02/10/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing services for 4 residents (Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, and Resident 5) of 5 sampled residents to ensure residents achieved the highest level of physical and emotional well-being when the facility failed to make a sufficient number of nursing staff available to meet residents' needs. This failure had the potential to place residents at greater risk for dehydration, skin breakdown and placed their safety in jeopardy.A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Acute on Chronic Heart Failure ( a worsening of a clinical condition when the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for oxygen and nutrients), End Stage Renal Disease (kidney function has declined to 15% of normal capacity) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM-disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). A review of Resident 2's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a baseline care plan for one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents when licensed nurses did not create a care plan for Resident 1's indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to allow urine to drain from the bladder and into a bag which collects the urine).This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) among residents with urinary catheters in place.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Fracture of Left Patella (kneecap), Intervertebral Disc Degeneration (progressive breakdown of shock absorbing discs in the spine), Muscle Weakness, Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy (two distinct conditions that interrupt the one way flow of urine from the kidneys to the outside of the body) and Need for Assistance with Personal Care.A review of Resident 1's care plans, dated 11/6/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-07 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results were readily accessible for all residents to review. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Examination of Survey Results, revised 04/2017, indicated, 2. A copy of the most recent survey report and any plans of correction are kept in a binder in the residents' dayroom. During observations on 03/05/2025 beginning at 8:15 AM of readily accessible areas to residents, the state survey results could not be found in the facility. During an interview on 03/05/2025 at 8:24 AM, the Activities Director revealed she did not know where the survey results were posted. She stated she did not know the survey results were required to be available without asking. During an interview on 03/05/2025 at 9:40 AM, the Social Services Director (SSD) stated the survey binder was on the table near the building's entrance. She said she last saw the survey binder when the state surveyors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the rights of residents and their representatives to have the ability to file grievances anonymously. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Grievances / Complaints, Filing, dated 2001, indicated, 5. Grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally or in writing, and may be filed anonymously. An undated facility Grievance Process, indicated, Grievance forms are available for the individual and/or their family members to complete independently and/or with employee assistance. Forms can be obtained by contacting the executive director, director of nursing services, social services director and other department heads, or they can be obtained from the nurses' station. A sign posted in the facility indicated that the Grievance Officer was Social Worker (SW) #16. During an observation on 03/05/2025 at 8:15 AM, there were no grievance forms available for public use. There was no way to take a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the status of 3 (Residents #107, #106, and #61) of 29 sampled residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. Specifically, the MDS assessments inaccurately reflected Resident #107 was discharged to a hospital; Resident #106 was discharged to home/community, and Resident #61 did not use a wander/elopement alarm. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, revised 11/2019, indicated, Any person completing a portion of the Minimum Data Set/MDS (Resident Assessment Instrument) must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment. The policy also indicated, 3. The information captured on the assessment reflects the status of the resident during the observation (look-back) period for that assessment. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident #107 on 05/29/2024, readmitted the resident on 11/18/2024, and discharged the resident on 12/06/2024. According to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's admission Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) accurately captured an admission diagnosis of a serious mental illness (SMI) for 1 (Resident #64) of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR. Specifically, Resident #64's admission PASRR did not capture their admission diagnosis of unspecified psychosis. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, revised 12/2016, revealed, a. The facility will participate in or complete the Level I screen for all potential admissions regardless of payer source to determine if the individual meets the criterion for mental disorder (SMI/SMD), intellectual disability (ID) or related condition. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #64 on 11/01/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of unspecified psychosis (onset date 11/01/2024). Resident #64's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion (ROM) received care and services to prevent any further decrease in ROM for 1 (Resident #28) of 2 residents reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative services. Specifically, Resident #28 had an order for staff to ask rehabilitation services to perform passive ROM, but there was no documentation that this order had been completed. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing Services, indicated, 1. Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services (e.g. [exempli gratia, for example], physical, occupational or speech therapies). 2. Residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of stay or when discharged from rehabilitative care. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #28 on 03/04/2017. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of morbid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safe from eloping from the facility for 1 (Resident #61) of 2 residents reviewed for elopements. Specifically, Resident #61 eloped from the facility on 02/25/2025 and was found in a parking lot approximately one block away from the facility. At the time of the elopement Resident #61 was utilizing a WanderGuard device (departure alert system); however, the WanderGuard device was not applied in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 supply closet observed containing medical supplies was locked and inaccessible to residents. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Wandering and Elopements, revised 03/2019, specified, 2. If a resident is missing, initiated the elopement/missing resident emergency procedure: which included, c. if the resident is not located, notify the administrator and the director of nursing services, the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were locked when unattended by staff for 1 of 6 medication carts observed. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, revised 04/2019, indicated, The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. The policy revealed the section titled, Policy Interpretation and Implementation, included, 9. Unlocked medication carts are not left unattended. During an observation on 03/07/2025 at 10:35 AM, an unattended and unlocked medication cart was observed outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. The staff were not around or within eyesight of the cart. There were no residents nearby. During an interview on 03/07/2025 at 10:39 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #19 confirmed she was in a resident's room and out of eyesight from the medication cart. She stated she should have locked the medication cart. During an interview on 03/07/2025 at 11:31 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an order to discontinue a medication was transcribed into the clinical record for 1 (Resident #84) of 28 sampled residents for whom orders were reviewed. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Discontinued Medications, revised in 04/2007, indicated, 1. A practitioner's order to discontinue a resident's medication must be documented in the resident's clinical record and on the medication administration record (MAR). An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #84 on 09/15/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of type two diabetes mellitus. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/23/2024, revealed Resident #84 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A physician note, dated 01/27/2025, revealed Resident #84 had a follow-up appointment with an outside provider, Physician #22, on 01/27/2025 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for three residents (Resident 1, Resident 2 & Resident 3) of four sampled residents when Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3 developed a gray-white residue inside their oral cavities and malodorous breath. This finding had the potential to result in tooth decay, gum disease, discomfort, and tooth loss among residents. Findings: Record review of Resident 1's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 9/5/17 with medical diagnoses including Hemiplegia (Paralysis or weakness on one side of the body) & Hemiparesis (One-sided muscle weakness) following a Cerebral Infarction (A medical condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, leading to damage or death of brain tissue). Record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-An assessment tool) dated 8/06/24 indicated he needed set-up or clean-up assistance with oral care. Record review of a Palliative Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were discarded from the only treatment cart (cart containing supplies and treatments for resident wounds) the facility had. This finding decreased the facility's potential to prevent residents from receiving outdated medications/supplies. Findings: During an interview with Licensed Staff E on 2/04/25 at 11:30 a.m., she confirmed she was a treatment nurse at the facility. Licensed Staff E stated the charge treatment nurse regularly checked the cart to ensure there were no expired medications or supplies but was on leave of absence. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/04/25 at 12:03 p.m., with Licensed Staff E, the treatment cart was checked for expired medications. The following expired medications and supplies were found in the treatment cart, stored with other active medications/supplies, and not labeled for destruction or disposal: 1. Silver nitrate (A topical antiseptic agent used to treat certain types of wounds) applicators (approximately 10), with an expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Social Services Department resolved the resident concerns grievances for brought up by one resident (Resident 2) of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2 reported his bed frame was broken and a staff member broke his electronic tablet (a portable computer with a touchscreen designed for easy use on the go). This resulted in Resident 2's boredom and frustration when the electronic tablet had not been replaced and the inability to sleep comfortably in bed. Findings: Record review or Resident 2's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 3/29/21 with medical diagnoses including Hemiplegia (Paralysis or weakness on one side of the body) & Hemiparesis (One-sided muscle weakness) following a Cerebral Infarction (A medical condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, leading to damage or death of brain tissue), and insomnia (sleep disorder characterized by difficulty falling or staying asleep). Record review of a facility document titled, THEFT AND LOSS REPORT ,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was able to receive private telephone calls during her stay at the facility. This triggered a family member (Family Member AA) to call the police to perform a wellness check on Resident 1 since she was unable to contact Resident 1 by phone after multiple attempts. This failure had the potential to result in inability for Resident 1 and other residents of the facility to socialize and interact with the outside world, which could affect their emotional and mental health. This finding also had the potential to result in inability for friends and family members to advocate for the residents' health, request updates on their medical status, and ensure they were safe and comfortable at the facility. Findings: Record review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (Facility demographic) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Fracture of One Rib. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) received medications as ordered by the physician, when one routine medication (a prescription that is followed until another order cancels it), Chlordiazepoxide (a medication used to treat symptoms of anxiety and symptoms of alcohol withdrawal) was unavailable for five scheduled doses. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 1 to experience anxiety and symptoms of alcohol withdrawal. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record (patient demographics and admission diagnoses), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities) and alcohol dependence with withdrawal (symptoms that occur when someone stops using alcohol after a period of heavy drinking and may include headaches, nausea, tremors, and anxiety). A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and facility document review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee (QAPI, a data driven and proactive approach to quality improvement; process used to ensure services are meeting quality standards and assuring care reaches a certain level) failed to identify quality deficiencies and subsequently investigate and act upon the deficiencies once identified, as evidenced by: 1 of 3 sampled Residents (Resident 1) experienced a 30.8 (31) pound weight loss during his first 18 days at the facility. Facility staff did not notify Resident 1's physician or nurse practitioner (NP) of the severe weight loss; interventions to address the severe weight loss were not implemented; and Resident 1's family took him from the facility AMA (Against Medical Advice - in an effort to get him help) and transported him directly to Hospital 1's Emergency Department (ED), where he was admitted into the ICU (Intensive Care Unit). Resident 1's weight loss at the facility was documented on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was emergently transferred to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) in a safe manner, when physician orders and facility policies were not followed. This had the potential to result in harm, and even death to Resident 1. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Cirrhosis of the Liver (Permanent scarring that damages the liver and interferes with its functioning), and Hepatic Encephalopathy (An often-temporary neurological (nervous system) disorder due to chronic, severe liver disease) according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). Record review of Resident 1's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet-An assessment tool) dated 5/03/23 indicated his BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition [ the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses] assessment) score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure laundry staff observed proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) use when handling used laundry. This failure increased the potential of spread of pathogens and communicable diseases among residents and staff at the facility. Findings: During an observation of the laundry room on 11/17/22 at 4:04 p.m., a single yellow gown was observed hanging on a peg by the washers. During a concurrent interview, Housekeeping Supervisor stated the staff would put on gloves and the yellow gown, handle the dirty laundry, then remove the gloves and gown after. Housekeeping Supervisor stated the gloves get discarded, but the gown would be re-hung on the peg for re-use. Housekeeping Supervisor stated the laundry staff would use one gown to process an approximated 10 loads of laundry during an eight-hour shift. Housekeeping Supervisor confirmed the laundry staff moves between the dirty (area for receiving and handling the soiled laundry) and clean (area for processing the washed items) areas frequently throughout the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities) for three of three sampled residents (Resident 53, 90 and 7) were accurately assessed of their current health and functional status when: 1) Resident 53's MDS indicated he had stage four pressure ulcer (wound is very deep, reaching into muscle and bone and causing extensive damage); however, Resident 53's physician documented Resident 53 had an arterial ulcer (damage to the arteries due to lack of blood flow to tissue). 2) Resident 90's MDS indicated she had septicemia (bacteria enter the bloodstream, and cause blood poisoning which triggers sepsis [an overwhelming and life-threatening response to infection]); however, Resident 90's record did not indicate she was monitored or treated for infection. 3) Resident 7 spoke Cantonese and used hand gestures to communicate with facility staff, however, Resident 7's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered Care Plan for three of 24 sampled residents (Resident 27, 80 and 7) when, 1. Facility staff were aware of Resident 27's repeated refusal of showers, however, no care plan interventions were put in place to ensure Resident 27's personal hygiene needs were maintained. (Reference F677) 2. Facility did not develop a communication care plan and activity care plan for Resident 80 to ensure Resident 80's needs were met. 3. Facility did not develop communication care plan and activity care plan for Resident 7 to ensure Resident 7's needs were met. These failures had the potential for facility staff to provide inadequate care to vulnerable residents when their individual needs and interests were not addressed appropriately. Findings: RESIDENT 27 1. During an observation and concurrent interview with Resident 27 on 11/14/22 at 11:19 AM, Resident 27 was in her bed watching television. When Resident 27 was asked about her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview and record the facility failed to provide scheduled showers to three (Resident 27, 80 and 35) out of five sampled residents. This failure resulted in residents verbalizing feelings of not feeling clean or good about themselves. Findings: RESIDENT 27 During a record review for Resident 27, the Face sheet (A one-page summary of important information about a resident) indicated Resident 27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Left Hip Fracture (a break in the thigh bone); Depression (a mental disorder characterized by a persistently depressed mood and long-term loss of pleasure or interest in life) and Anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). During an observation and concurrent interview with Resident 27 on 11/14/22 at 11:19 AM, Resident 27 was in her bed watching television. When Resident 27 was asked about her shower schedule, Resident 27 stated she had not received shower since admission; however, she stated she received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to provide activities to meet the needs and preferences for three of 24 sampled residents (Residents 27, 80, and 7) when: 1. Resident 7 was not provided with activity that he could understand. Resident 7 spoke Chinese and used hand gestures to communicate with facility staff. 2. Resident 27 and 80 were left in their rooms without activities. This failure had the potential for self-isolation and decreased stimulation resulting in a diminished quality of life. Findings: Resident 7 A review of Resident 7's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart conditions, lung conditions, unspecified dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) without behavioral distrubance, who spoke and read Chinese only. During observation on 11/14/22 at 11:18 a.m., in Resident 7's room, the facility's activity calendar, posted on his wall, was written in English. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders, and provide adequate care after dialysis (A procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 29 and Resident 60) when the pressure dressings to prevent bleeding, applied at the dialysis clinic right after dialysis treatments were not removed timely, and the Arteriovenous (AV) Shunts (An arteriovenous fistula or shunt is an abnormal connection or passageway between an artery and a vein surgically created to remove and return blood during dialysis) were not assessed for bruit and thrill (Normal vibrations and sounds that indicate the fistula is working. Any changes may indicate problems with the fistula). These findings could have caused Resident 29's right upper arm Arteriovenous (AV) Shunt to stop working, and had the potential to cause malfunction of Resident 29 and Resident 60's current fistulas, inability to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide care to three of sampled residents (Resident 27, 80 and 35) and two unsampled residents (Residents 320 and 325) when: 1. Scheduled showers for Resident 27, 80 and 35 were not provided. This failure to maintain Residents' personal grooming and hygiene needs had the potential to raise the risk of unidentified skin issues, bacterial and fungal infections. 2. Call lights for Resident 27, 320 and 325 were not answered timely. This failure kept the residents needs uncommunicated to the staff, potentially placing them at risk for neglect and harm. Findings: RESIDENT 27 During an observation and concurrent interview with Resident 27 on 11/14/22 at 11:19 AM, Resident 27 was in her bed watching television. When Resident 27 was asked about her shower schedule, Resident 27 stated she had not received shower since admission. During a record review for Resident 27, the document titled ADL - Bathing/ shower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure staffing requirements where met when the facility's daily occupancy was more than 110 and did not use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week to oversee the care provided to the residents. This failure had the potential risk to endanger the health and safety for all the residents. Findings: During an interview with Staffer X (person responsible to ensure staffing requirements for each shift are filled) on 11/18/22 at 10:29 AM, Staffer X was asked about her process when staff called in (could not come to work). Staffer X stated she would either call the regular staff, ask staff from prior shift, or call the registry agency to fill up the shift. Staffer X stated the facility used 4 registry agency for both CNAs and Licensed Nurses. Staffer X verified no registry staff used from 11/1/22 to 11/16/22. During a review of the document titled Daily Staffing and concurrent interview with Staffer X on 11/18/22 at 10:44 AM, Staffer X verified from 11/1/22 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not store food items under sanitary conditions when foods was kept past the use-by dates and frozen items were found with ice crystals clinging to them. This had to the potential to cause food-borne illness in a vulnerable population. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/14/22 at 10:12 a.m., with Dietary Manager (DM) and Registered Dietician (RD), the freezer was observed for sanitation of the food inside. The first freezer was observed to have a box labeled hot dogs which was opened with many loose hot dogs observed inside of an open plastic bag. The box was labeled with an open date of 1/8/22 and an expired date of 8/27/22. DM stated the facility does not have hot dogs on the menu any longer and did not know why the box of hot dogs remained in the freezer. RD observed the labeling of the box and agreed the hot dogs had expired and should not be prepared for residents to consume. DM observed the ice crystals on the hot dogs inside of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record the facility failed to have the appropriate compliment of Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee members when the Medical Director attended one out of three quarters sampled for 2022. This failure had the potential to result in the medical director not providing oversight and input into the overall clinical facility management as provided in the QAA meetings. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/18/22 with Administrator, QAPI (Quality Assessment Performance Improvement) Meeting Minutes were reviewed with Administrator who stated the committee would meet every month and the Medical Director would attend the meetings at least quarterly. The QAPI meeting minutes sign-in attendance forms were reviewed for 1/26/22 where the Medical Director signature was observed. The QAPI committee meeting sign-in sheets for the following meetings dated: 2/23/22, 3/23/22, 4/27/22, 5/2022 (copy of requested meeting was not provided to surveyor), 6/29/22, 7/27/22, 8/31/22, 9/2022 (copy of requested meeting minutes were not provided to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement effective policies and procedures to ensure COVID-19 vaccinations were offered accordingly for three of five sampled residents (Residents 102, 108 and 109) who were clinically eligible. This failure increased the susceptibility of these clinically eligible individuals to contract and transmit the COVID-19 virus among the residents and staff. Findings: During Entrance Conference on 11/14/22 at 11:12 a.m., the facility provided an undated log indicating a list of residents and their COVID-19 vaccination status. Further record review on 11/17/22 at 9:03 a.m., indicated, UKNOWN under VACCINE BRAND for Residents 102, 108 and 109. There were no entries under tabs 1st DOSE, 2nd DOSE, 1ST BOOSTER, 2ND BOOSTER, and 3RD BOOSTER, for said three residents either. During a concurrent interview DSD stated Resident 102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and both Residents 108 and 109 were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 76) when an annual assessment for Resident 76 was not completed for more than 92 days. This failure had the potential to cause inadequate care based on delayed assessments and care planning. Findings: During a record review for Resident 76, the Minimum Data Set (MDS-health status screening and assessment tool used for all residents) dated 7/04/22, indicated Resident 76 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Coronary Artery Disease (CAD - caused by plaque buildup in the wall of the arteries that supply blood to the heart); Hypertension (High Blood Pressure); Diabetes (disease that result in too much sugar in the blood); and Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA - also known as Stroke). During a record review for Resident 76 and with MDS Consultant A on 11/17/22 at 3:10 PM, the electronic MDS tracking log for Resident 76 indicated the most recent MDS Quarterly assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to keep one resident (Resident 35) out of two sampled residents safe while smoking. This failure resulted in Resident 35 suffering burns on his fingers from smoking. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's, admission Record, dated 4/4/22 indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of chronic pulmonary edema (a condition caused by excess fluid in the lungs), primary osteoarthritis of both hips (a condition that starts with the breakdown of cartilage in the joints and as the cartilage wears down the bone ends may thicken and form bony growths also known as spurs), insulin dependent diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body process blood sugar or glucose) and difficulty walking. During a record review for Resident 35, the Minimum Data Set (MDS- health status screening and assessment tool used for all residents) dated 9/16/22 indicated Resident 35 had a BIMs (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 29) was kept safe, when medications were left by Resident 29's bedside, unattended, when she did not have an order for self-administration of medications. This failure could have resulted in omission and/or overdoses of medications, and deterioration of medications by leaving them unattended and exposed for a prolonged period of time, which ultimately could have caused serious harm to Resident 29 and other residents if they had ingested them. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (A medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life), Dependence on Renal Dialysis, and Diabetes Mellitus (A chronic disease characterized by high levels of blood sugar),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-11-18 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of COVID-19 vaccination exemption for one of eight sampled staff with granted exemptions. This failure had the potential for decreased assurance of adherence to the facility's established COVID-19 mitigation policies and procedures by staff rendered more susceptible to the COVID-19 virus, which could lead to an increased transmission risk of COVID-19 among the residents and staff. Findings: During an interview on 11/17/22 at 9:03 a.m., DSD stated the facility tracked COVID-19 vaccination and/or exemptions of all staff. During a concurrent record review, DSD was unable to locate Licensed Staff D's booster vaccine exemption form. DSD stated Licensed Staff D worked part-time in the facility as a wound nurse. During an interview on 11/17/22 at 10:31 a.m., IP stated she recalled requesting Licensed Staff D to complete and return the vaccination exemption form months ago. IP confirmed there had not been any follow-up done since then and stated, No, I should have. IP stated resident assignments and PPE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$173,323 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $108,180 — penalty dated 2026-01-07
- $65,143 — penalty dated 2023-09-14
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROVIDENCE GROUP WINE COUNTRY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/16/2016 |
| PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/30/2023 |
| SERRANO, NOEL | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| HADLEY, SPENCER | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 11/05/2022 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056153. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.