Chehalem Post Acute
1900 E. Fulton Street, Newberg, OR 97132 · For profit - Corporation · 84 certified beds · (503) 538-2108 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $54,581 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-07)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.2% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.2% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.7% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.4% | 4.9% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.8% | 20.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.8% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.3% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 5.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.6% | 21.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.1% | 13.9% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.3% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 51.3% | 81.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.6% | 21.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.4% | 16.1% | 12.0% | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.3%CMS range 46.0–71.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 6.6–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 33.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.1–14.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 76.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.38 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.80 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure supervision and safety interventions were in place to prevent smoking related accidents, and failed to ensure smoking materials were stored in a safe manner for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#27) reviewed for smoking safety. This placed the resident at increased risk for personal injury from fires. This failure, determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy situation, placed Resident 27 at increased risk for personal injury from fire. Findings include: The facility's 10/2023 revised Smoking Policy for Independent and Supervised Residents indicated: -All residents who wish to smoke will be assessed for their ability to smoke safely. -Residents who do not meet the established criteria to smoke independently will be provided assistance/supervision during all smoking activities. -No smoking or use of smoking materials will be allowed on the grounds, including parking lots, except at the following locations: Resident smoking shed;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in Resident 13 deliberately kicking Resident 14's walker which resulted in Resident 14 losing her/his balance. Resident 14 fell to the floor and received a head laceration with contusion (bruise) and a fractured hip which required surgery. This placed residents at risk for physical harm. Findings include: The facility's 8/2024 Abuse-Screening, Training, Identification, Investigation, Reporting and Protection policy and procedure stated Abuse is the willful infliction of injury resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Resident 13 readmitted to the facility in 10/2024, with diagnoses including Alzheimer's and paranoid schizophrenia. Resident 13's 10/26/24 Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow care plan interventions, failed to assess for care plan effectiveness, failed to identify and implement new fall interventions and failed to provide adequate supervision needed to prevent falls for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#12) reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in the resident having 17 falls in nine months, one with serious injury which required emergency medical services and treatment at the hospital. Findings include: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 2/2021 with diagnoses including diabetes, dementia and stroke with right side hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis). The 2/11/21 admission MDS revealed Resident 12 had severe cognitive impairments and required extensive assistance of one to two or more persons for transferring and toileting. Resident 12 was frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel and was not on a toileting program. Resident 12 had falls within the last two to six months (prior to admission) and two or more falls since her/his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide written advance notice to a resident/responsible party prior to room changes for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 11 and 12) reviewed for resident rights. This placed residents at risk for potential adjustment difficulties and delayed family communication related to changes in room location. Findings include:The facility's Room/Roommate and Change Notification Policy, dated 8/1/24, indicated residents had the right to receive a written notice, including the reason for the change, before a resident's room or roommate was changed. 1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis affecting all four limbs of the body) and aphasia (a language disorder resulting from brain damage affecting speaking or comprehension). Resident 12's admission Profile/Face Sheet revealed Witness 2 (Family Member) was the responsible party. Progress notes from 7/2025 through 9/2025 revealed no documentation or written notification of Resident 12's room change had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#12 and 16) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for a lack of personal hygiene and loss of dignity. Findings include:The facility's Activities of Daily Living Policy dated 3/2018 indicated residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living independently would receive services necessary to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. 1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with diagnoses of quadriplegia (paralysis affecting all four limbs of the body) and aphasia (a language disorder resulting from brain damage affecting speaking or comprehension). Resident 12's 7/23/25 admission MDS indicated the resident had a severe cognition deficit and was dependent with bathing/showering. The Care plan dated 7/24/25 revealed Resident 12 was dependent on staff for her/his ADL care needs and required one-person total assistance for showering. The care plan did not include frequency of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records were kept private for 1 of 1 sampled facility record system reviewed for privacy. This placed residents at risk for lack of privacy. Findings include:On 6/23/25 a public complaint was received that alleged the facility did not keep resident records private and sent confidential resident information to Staff 3 (Former Staff/LPN) via a phone application (app) after she quit working at the facility on 6/19/25. On 8/11/25 at 11:50 AM documentation was received that indicated Staff 3's last day at the facility was on 6/19/25. On 8/11/25 at 10:26 AM Staff 3 stated she continued to receive resident private data through a phone app which included resident names, room numbers, information about new admissions and resident behaviors. Staff 3 stated she continued to receive resident information on the app for approximately one month after she stopped working at the facility. On 8/13/25 at 10:53 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged Staff 3's last day at the facility was on 6/19/25 and she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was available for at least eight consecutive hours for 6 of 79 days reviewed for RN coverage. This placed residents at risk for delayed nursing assessments. Findings include: A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports revealed the following dates with no RN coverage: -7/20/24 -9/16/24 -9/28/24 - 1/4/25 -1/5/25 -2/15/25 On 3/26/25 at 8:19 AM and 12:00 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the identified dates without the required RN coverage.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-28 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to conduct and complete a comprehensive facility wide assessment to care for its residents competently during day to day operations. This placed residents at risk for unidentified and unmet needs. Findings include: The 3/19/25 Facility Assessment was reviewed. The assessment was not comprehensive and failed to accurately include information on the following: - How the facility assessment was used to address staffing needs and competencies. - The percentage of transmission based precautions in the facility. - The number of ADL assistance based on the average census. - The ethnic, cultural and religious makeup of the facility resident population. - The high usage of agency staff. On 3/28/25 at 3:00 PM, Staff 1 (Administrator) reviewed the Facility Assessment and acknowledged the assessment was not comprehensive and did not have accurate information related to the areas indicated. No further information was provided.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-28 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that implemented action plans to correct identified quality deficiencies. This failed practice placed all residents at risk for not receiving the care and services for optimal resident outcomes. Findings include: The facility's undated Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy indicated it used a systematic, comprehensive and data driven approach to maintain and improve safety and quality. A 3/15/25 statement of guiding principles were indicated as the following: - The mission of doing more than just enough to provide quality care because of the quality of staff. - The purpose of a better process and systems to make resident lives better and staff's lives better. - Guiding principles of: every resident your resident, accountability, love/compassion and fun. On 3/28/25 at 3:00 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged the QAPI program did not recognize or address the following identified concerns: - Lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-28 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a qualified and trained infection preventionist in place for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection prevention and control. This placed residents at risk for inadequate infection control. Findings include: On 3/28/25 surveyors requested documentation to indicate the facility had an infection preventionist in place. On 3/28/25 at 10:56 AM Staff 2 (DNS) provided documentation to indicate Staff 51 (Former Infection Preventionist) was employed until 1/5/24 and Staff 7 (Infection Preventionist) started on 10/29/24. On 3/25/25 at 11:55 AM Staff 25 (RN) stated she worked at the facility in 2024 and was asked by Staff 2 to be the infection prevention nurse, but did not receive education or training and was terminated from the facility on 10/28/24. Staff 25 stated there was no infection preventionist working at the facility since January 2024. On 3/28/25 at 10:56 AM Staff 2 acknowledged the facility did not have a certified infection preventionist from 1/5/24 through 10/29/24 (298 days).
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided during care and resident records were kept private for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 37 and 45) and 1 of 1 sampled facility record system reviewed for privacy. This placed residents at risk for lack of privacy. Findings include: 1. On 11/4/24 a public complaint was received that alleged the facility did not keep resident records private by sending confidential resident information to Staff 26 (RN) via a phone application (app) after she was terminated from the facility . The 10/28/24 Termination Letter indicated Staff 26 was terminated from the facility as of 10/28/24. On 3/25/25 at 11:55 AM Staff 26 stated she worked at the facility in 2024 and was terminated on 10/28/24. Staff 25 stated after her termination she still continued to receive resident private data through a phone app which included information such as admissions, discharges and anything going on with residents. On 3/28/25 at 9:00 AM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged Staff 25 was terminated on 10/28/24 and continued to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement their policies and procedures for screening potential employees to prevent abuse for 3 of 3 sampled new employees (#s 8, 9 and 10) reviewed for employee screening. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Policy dated 9/2024 indicated the screening process for potential employees included contacting previous employers to request employment history which included: dates of services, position held, performance history and history of abuse/neglect. On 3/26/25 a random sample of three newly hired staff members was reviewed for reference checks with Staff 36 (Human Resources). On 3/26/25 at 10:00 AM Staff 36 stated the facility did not complete reference checks for newly hired staff since the change in ownership in 2024. Staff 36 acknowledged no reference checks were completed for Staff 8 (LPN), Staff 9 (CNA) and Staff 10 (CNA). On 3/26/25 at 10:10 AM and 3/27/25 at 8:21 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged reference checks were not completed for newly hired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident care needs for 1 of 1 resident council and 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 13, 16, 37 and 38) reviewed for concerns with staffing. This placed residents at risk for delayed and unmet care needs. Findings include: On 3/26/25 the facility provided a list of residents who: -Required assistance with dressing: 55 -Required assistance with bathing: 58 -Required assistance with toileting: 49 -Required assistance with incontinence care: 44 -Required assistance with two-person transfers: 23 -Required two person assistance with mechanical lifts: 10 -Required assistance with incontinence care: 44 -Received mental health services: 24 -Had wandering behaviors: 8 a. Resident Council Notes indicated the following: -1/20/25: Nursing: not responding to call lights in a timely manner. -2/24/25 Nursing: call light times exceeded one hour after 6:00 PM on most days. Grievances indicated the following resident concerns: -1/15/25: long call light times at night, 60 plus minutes.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure performance reviews were completed at least once every 12 months for 3 of 3 CNAs (#s 29, 30 and 31) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of care by competent staff. Findings include: Annual performance reviews and hire dates were requested on 3/25/25 and 3/28/25 from Staff 2 (DNS) for the following staff: -Staff 29 (CNA),hired on 6/12/23. -Staff 30 (CNA), hired on 9/12/22. -Staff 31 (CNA), hired on 4/10/84. No annual performance reviews were submitted to the survey team. On 3/25/25 at 1:47 PM and 3/28/25 at 9:00 AM Staff 2 acknowledged Staff 29, Staff 30 and Staff 31 worked at the facility for over one year and did not receive an annual performance reviews in the past 12 months.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain and administer medication to residents timely to ensure the provision of routine medications for 10 of 17 sampled residents (#s 15, 22, 33, 34, 35, 44, 53, 62, 166, 167) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: 1. Resident 22 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including alcohol dependence and osteoarthritis. a. A 3/15/25 physician order indicated the use of trazodone for sleep related to alcohol dependence. A 3/18/25 progress note by Staff 12 (CMA) indicated trazodone was ordered and would arrive in the pharmacy delivery. Review of the 3/2025 MAR revealed Resident 22 was not administered trazodone until 3/20/25 (five days after the order date). On 3/21/25 at 8:23 AM Staff 11 (CMA) stated Resident 22 did not have trazodone for three or four days. Staff 11 stated the resident received the medication only after contacting the pharmacy. On 3/25/25 at 10:07 AM Staff 12 (CMA) stated she contacted the pharmacy on 3/18/25 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were secured for 1 of 3 medication carts and 1 of 3 treatment carts reviewed for safe medication storage. This placed residents at risk for unauthorized access to medications. Findings include: The facility's 1/2023 Storage of Medications Policy specified the following: -The medication supply shall be accessible only to licensed nurses, pharmacy staff, and those lawfully authorized to administer medications such as medication aides. Medication carts, rooms, cabinets and medication supplies should remain locked when not in use or attended by persons with authorized access. 1. On 3/24/25 at 12:12 PM a treatment cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended in the hallway near the nurses station. On 3/24/25 at 12:15 PM Staff 8 (LPN) returned to the treatment cart and stated she left the cart unlocked and unattended and the cart contained resident insulin, creams and other treatment supplies. On 3/24/25 at 1:09 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated the expectation was for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed during meals for 2 of 3 halls reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination. Findings include: The 8/1/24 Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedure indicates effective hand hygiene reduces the incidence of healthcare-associated infections. All members of the healthcare team will comply with current Centers of Disease Control and Prevention hand hygiene guidelines. The procedure included: 3. Hand hygiene is the primary means of preventing the transmission of infection and should be performed as soon as possible after hands become contaminated and frequently during the working day. The following is list of some situations that require hand hygiene: c. Before and after direct resident contact; f. Before and after eating or handling food; g. Before and after assisting a resident with meals; s. After handling soiled equipment or utensils; On 3/19/25 between the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to inform residents and/or resident's responsible party of the risks and benefits, and to ensure consent was obtained, for the use of psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 22 and 30) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of informed consent of psychotropic medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 22 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including anxiety. A 3/15/25 physician order indicated the use of trazodone for sleep disorder. Review of Resident 22's medical record revealed no indication the resident was informed of the risks and benefits of the medication. On 3/26/25 Staff 37 (Regional RN) acknowledged Resident 22 was not informed of the risks and benefits of the use of trazodone. 2. Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. Resident 30's 2/2025 MAR revealed the resident received Quetiapine fumarate (an antipyschotic medication) one time a day for anxiety.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were clean and in good repair for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 37 and 54) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for lack of a homelike environment. Findings include: 1. Resident 37 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including hemiplegia. a. On 3/19/25 at 10:22 AM Resident 37's shared bathroom was observed to have dried feces inside and outside the toilet bowl. The toilet also was observed to have splattered layers of caked on old feces between the seam of the bowl and tank. Splatters of feces were observed on the floor. Review of Resident Council notes revealed the following: - 1/2025 residents indicated issues with the bathrooms not being cleaned daily. - 2/2025 residents indicated confusion on which staff cleaned the bathrooms and toilets. On 3/19/25 at 10:22 AM Witness 4 (Family) stated the bathroom toilet was in the observed condition for about a day or two. Resident 37 stated she/he used the toilet that morning. On 3/19/25 at 11:08 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan related to bowel care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#16) reviewed for constipation. This placed residents at risk for lack of personal preferences being honored. Findings include: Resident 16 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including quadriplegia. Resident 16's revised 11/12/23 Care Plan indicated Resident 16 was incontinent of bowel related to quadriplegia and was at risk for constipation. Resident 16 received a bowel regimen that included medications and a suppository. Interventions included a bowel regimen including digital stimulation and suppository. On 3/19/25 at 11:51 AM Resident 16 stated nursing staff, mostly consisting of agency staff, tried to tell her/him when she/he could and coud not have a suppository and she/he was upset about it. On 3/25/25 at 9:31 AM Staff 22 (LPN) stated she was an agency nurse. Staff 22 stated when she worked with Resident 16 she was unaware the resident preferred a suppository instead of oral medications.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure Staff 32 (LPN) adhered to professional standards for medication management. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of medication. Findings include: Resident 39 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. The 2/2024 MAR indicated Resident 39 received escitalopram, also known as Lexapro (antidepressant) 20 mg once daily. The 3/4/24 provider note indicated I will half the dose of Celexa [also known as citalopram]. A review of the prior physician orders and 2/2024 MARs indicated Resident 39 did not receive Celexa prior to 3/4/24. The 3/4/24 Celexa order was transcribed by Staff 24 (LPN) and indicated 10 mg daily was set to start on 3/5/24 at 7:00 AM. The escitalopram was discontinued, and the reason documented was decrease to 10 mg. On 3/24/25 at 8:46 AM Staff 24 stated she often worked with Resident 39 and the resident often went back and forth with meds. Staff 24 stated she did not remember the 3/4/24 incident with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to clarify insulin orders with the physician, monitor and provide bowel medications as ordered and failed to identify medication discrepancies for 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 22, 39 and 114) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for not receiving medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 22 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure. The 9/2/24 care plan indicated Resident 22 was continent of bowel. Interventions included to record bowel movement patterns each day and to monitor for signs or symptoms of constipation related to opioid use. The care plan did not indicate any history of Resident 22 refusing bowel medication. A 10/2/24 physician order indicated the use of Milk of Magnesia as needed for no bowel movement after three days. Review of Resident 22's bowel record indicated no bowel movement from 2/26/25 to 3/1/25 (four days) and from 3/3/25 to 3/6/25 (four days). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess a resident's fall for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#53) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at increased risk for injury from falls. Findings include: Resident 53 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including dementia. The 10/12/24 9:14 AM progress note indicated Resident 53 had an unwitnessed fall, and included, the CNA reported the fall to the nurse, vital signs were taken and within normal limits, Assessed the resident for injuries, skin intact and no signs of immediate bruising or injuries. Resident appeared to be confused. Neuro checks were started immediately. The resident was assisted by the nurse and CNA from the floor to [her/his] wheelchair. On 3/27/25 a request was made for the fall assessment for the 10/12/24 fall. On 3/28/25 at 12:28 PM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged a fall assessment was not completed for the 10/12/2 fall.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medication for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#53) reviewed for unnecessary medication. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects. Findings include: Resident 53 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including dementia. The 2/24/25 physician order indicated Resident 53 was to receive the following: -lorazepam (antianxiety psychotropic medication) 0.25 mg every two hours PRN for anxiety and agitation. May not give within two hours of the morphine dose. -morphine sulfate (narcotic medicatin) give 0.25 ml every hour PRN for pain or shortness of breath. May not give morphine within two hours of the lorazepam dose. The 3/2024 controlled substance log indicated Resident 53 received the following medications: *3/21/25: -lorazepam at 9:42 AM and morphine at 9:48 AM. Both medications were signed as administered by Staff 11 (CMA). -lorazepam at 12:07 PM and morphine at 12:07 PM. Both medications were signed as administered by Staff 11.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide timely diagnostic services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#164) reviewed for lab services. This placed residents at risk for undiagnosed care needs. Findings include: Resident 164 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes. The 10/3/24 physician order indicated staff were to obtain a stool sample from the resident to rule out Clostridium Difficile (c-diff, a bacterial infection that can cause severe diarrhea). The 10/9/24 1:20 PM progress note by Staff 25 (RN) indicated Resident 164's stool sample was collected and picked up by the lab. On 3/25/25 at 11:55 AM Staff 25 stated Resident 164's stool sample was obtained initially after the 10/3/24 order was received and staff accidentally put another resident's name on it. Staff 25 stated due to the error, staff had to obtain another sample on 10/9/24, delaying the lab results. On 3/28/25 at 12:41 PM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged the physician order to obtain Resident 164's stool sample was received on 10/3/24 and the facility did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify the ordering physician of the results of a critical lab value for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#53) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment. Findings include: Resident 53 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including dementia. On 10/9/24 labs were obtained, and the results were completed and reported to the facility the same day. The results indicated Resident 53 had a critical hemoglobin level of 5.8 g/DL (grams per deciliter) (normal reference range was 12.5-14.9 g/DL). It was noted on the lab report that a critical value was identified, and the facility was contacted, but there was no one available to take critical value. The 10/16/24 progress note indicated Resident 53 had abdominal pain and later had vomiting and absent bowel tones. The resident was transported to the hospital. The 10/16/24 4:57 PM progress note by Staff 2 (DNS) indicated a chart review was completed, and a critical lab value was in an unreviewed state. A call was placed to Staff 39…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to administer a pneumococcal vaccine for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for contracting communicable illnesses. Findings include: A review of the facility 9/1/2024 Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations policy indicated it was the policy of the center to offer the Influenza and Pneumococcal immunizations to residents in accordance with federal regulations and current CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and heart failure. A review of the 1/18/25 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 24 was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 24's clinical record revealed an undated pending consent for Prevnar 20 (a type of Pneumococcal vaccination). On 3/26/25 at 1:33 PM and on 3/28/25 at 10:12 AM Staff 7 (Infection Preventionist) stated she recalled talking with Resident 24 in October or November 2024 to educate and offer a pneumococcal vaccination that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain resident representative consent for a Covid-19 vaccine for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#40) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for a lack of informed education and consent and at risk for contracting communicable illnesses. Findings include: A review of the facility's 9/1/24 Covid-19 Vaccination policy and procedure indicated residents were offered recommended Covid-19 vaccinations upon admission and as eligible per CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) recommendations. Consent for approved vaccines were obtained prior to or at the time of vaccination. Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with diagnoses including dementia and adult failure to thrive. A review of the 8/5/24 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 40's cognition was severely impaired. A review of Resident 40's clinical record revealed Witness 5 (Family Member) was Resident 40's Power of Attorney and Healthcare Decision maker. A review of Resident 40's immunization list revealed on 10/16/24 the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide advance written notice to a resident or their responsible party prior to a room change for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for resident rights. This placed residents at risk for potential adjustment difficulties related to room changes. Findings include: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 8/2024, with diagnoses including dementia and visual disturbances. Resident 10 was also receiving hospice services. Resident 10's admission Record revealed Witness 4 (Family Member) was Resident 10's spouse and signed the consent to treat upon admission. Resident 10's census record revealed Resident 10 was moved from room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 to 21-2 on 10/30/24. On 12/26/24 at 9:10 AM, Witness 4 (family member) stated they entered the facility and were disturbed when Resident 10 was not in her/his room (17-2), there was just an empty bed. Witness 4 stated Resident 10's behavior and demeanor were more anxious and aggressive after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow care plan interventions when transferring for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for accidents. This failure put residents at risk for injury. Findings include: Resident 7 admitted to the facility in 3/2019, with diagnoses including spinal fusion and anxiety. Resident 7's 5/1/24 care plan revealed Resident 7 required two-person assistance with a gait belt for transfers. The resident's care plan also revealed she/he frequently falsely accused staff. Resident 7's 5/10/24 Quarterly MDS indicated she/he was cognitively intact with a BIMs of 15. The facility's Fall Investigation initiated on 8/3/24 revealed the following: -On 8/3/24 Staff 10 (Agency CNA) attempted to transfer Resident 7 without a second staff member. -Staff 10 stated Resident 7 had told her/him that they were a one-person stand and pivot transfer. -Staff 10 attempted to transfer Resident 7, was unsuccessful, and returned Resident 7 to her/his bed and went to find help. - Resident 7 stated Staff 10 had dropped her/him on the floor. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal and physical abuse by a resident for 1 of 7 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for isolation. Findings include: Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including obesity. Resident 4 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including dementia with behaviors. A 1/30/24 facility Event Summary Report indicated Resident 4 became easily agitated and was verbally aggressive. Common behaviors of Resident 4 included verbal aggression toward others and a history of yelling, cursing and kicking others. Resident 4 was noted to be often confused and was cognitively impaired. The report indicated Resident 3 was sitting near Resident 4 during an activity. Upon getting agitated, Resident 4 kicked Resident 3 in the left foot three times and yelled profanities at Resident 3. Both residents were separated and Resident 4 was escorted back to her/his room in the Memory Care Unit. The report concluded verbal and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-04 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to promptly respond to grievances and recommendations from the resident council for 2 of 2 months reviewed. This placed residents at risk for unresolved quality of life and care issues. Findings include: The 3/2019 Grievance Policy indicated the Activities Director or designee was to complete a grievance form when a global issue was raised at a resident council meeting. The form was to be given to the appropriate department head for follow up and a response. During a resident group meeting on 11/30/23 at 1:00 PM, residents stated facility staff did not consistently respond to suggestions and concerns offered by the resident council. Residents indicated they did not feel staff communicated with them effectively and did not feel fully informed of the actions taken in response to their concerns. Resident Council Minutes on 6/2023, 7/2023, 8/2023, 9/2023, 10/2023 and 11/2023 revealed the following resident issues with staff responses documented: -10/2023 Evening call lights taking 30 minutes, then staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. On 11/27/23 at 12:27 PM Resident 37's room was observed to have a loose doorknob plate and a plastic kick plate on the front left edge of the door that was jagged, sharp and peeling away from the door. On 11/27/23 at 12:27 PM Witness 5 (Family Member) stated she was concerned about the loose doorknob plate and the plastic kick plate on the front left edge of the door that was jagged, sharp and peeling away from the door. She stated she complained to staff about the issues several times. On 11/28/23 at 12:26 PM Staff 15 (Maintenance Director) observed Resident 27's room and acknowledged the loose doorknob plate and plastic kick plate on the front left edge of the door was jagged, sharp and peeling away from the door. 4. On 12/4/23 at 12:00 PM the carpet in the hallways was observed to have dark brown or black spots throughout the facility. room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have a missing threshold in the doorway with frayed carpet and the carpet was observed to be frayed between the dayroom and hallway. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident care needs for 1 of 4 halls reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for delayed and unmet care needs. Findings include: On 12/1/23 the facility provided lists of residents who: -Required assistance with eating: 4. -Required two-person assistance with transfers: 17. -Required mechanical lift with transfers: 14. -Required assistance with dressing: 31. -Required assistance with bathing: 29. -Required assistance with toileting: 32. -Residents who were incontinent: 27. -Had wandering behaviors: 4. -Had behavioral healthcare needs: 6. Interviews with residents revealed the following concerns: -On 11/27/23 at 9:56 AM Resident 8 stated she/he waited up to an hour for her/his call light to be answered. -On 11/27/23 at 11:01 AM Resident 21 stated she/he waited up to an hour for her/his call light to be answered. Resident 21 stated on one occasion she/he almost peed in my pants waiting for her/his call light to be answered and night shift was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-04 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports (DCSDR) were correct and complete for 15 of 27 days reviewed for staff postings. This placed residents and the public at risk for incorrect staffing information. Findings include: The Direct Care Staff Daily Reports from 11/1/23 through 11/27/23 revealed 15 days without census information included. Resident Census information was missing on the DCSDR for one or more shifts on the following dates: 11/1/23, 11/6/23, 11/9/23, 11/12/23, 11/13/23, 11/14/23, 11/15/23, 11/16/23, 11/17/23, 11/18/23, 11/19/23, 11/20/23, 11/21/23, 11/23/23, 11/24/23 A review of facility payroll records from 11/1/23 through 11/27/23 revealed inconsistencies with the DCSDR. Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the missing census information on the DCSDR on 11/30/2023 at 10:34 AM.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper labeling of biologicals for 2 of 2 treatment carts and 1 of 1 medication room, and failed to ensure medication carts were properly secured during a random observation. This placed residents at risk for reduced efficacy of medication and unauthorized access to medications. Findings include: 1. On 12/1/23 at 12:26 PM two open, undated vials of Tuberculin (used for the testing in the diagnosis of Tuberculosis) were observed in the medication room refrigerator. The manufacturer's instructions indicated to discard the medication 30 days after opening. On 12/1/23 at 12:26 PM Staff 13 (LPN) acknowledged the two vials of Tuberculin were open and not labeled with an open date. 2. On 12/1/23 at 12:40 PM two open insulin glargine pens, and one open Lantus insulin vial were observed in the medication cart with no open dates. On 12/1/23 at 12:40 PM Staff 13 (LPN) acknowledged the two insulin glargine pens and one Lantus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-04 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to offer residents a menu to accommodate their preferences for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 8 and 10) reviewed for food choices. This placed residents at risk for not having food preferences honored and weight loss. Findings include: 1. On 11/27/23 at 9:56 AM Resident 8 stated she/he had a hard time getting a copy of the pre-printed menu. Resident 8 stated it sometimes took a few days to get a copy of the pre-printed menu. Resident 8 stated the menu and alternate menus were determined by the facility and she/he was not able to make individual food choices. On 11/27/23 at 2:27 PM Resident 10 stated she/he was served food items that she/he did not like and was not given a menu for individualized food choices. On 11/28/23 at 12:02 PM Staff 14 (CNA) stated some residents were given pre-printed menus and an alternate food menu was posted on the bulletin board near the nurses' station. Staff 14 stated if a resident did not want what was being served, staff had to go back to the kitchen and it took about ten minutes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to store and handle food in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 facility kitchen reviewed for sanitary food storage and handling. This placed residents at risk for food-borne illness and contamination. Findings include: On 11/27/23 at 9:09 AM during the initial tour of the main kitchen the following were observed: Dry Storage: -Large dented can of pineapple tidbits on rack with non-dented cans. Walk-in refrigerator: -An uncovered and undated container of sliced cucumbers that appeared dry. -A covered tray of deviled eggs undated. -Four small covered bowls of salad undated. On 11/27/23 at 9:29 AM Staff 23 (Dietary Aide) confirmed the identified items were not appropriately covered and/or dated as they should have been. Staff 23 stated the deviled eggs were from Thanksgiving Day, 5 days prior. On 12/1/23 at 9:03 AM during a follow up tour of the kitchen, Staff 22 (Dietary Manager) stated it was her expectation food items were to be dated and covered as they were prepared.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents recieved informed Advance Beneficiary Notification (ABN) information for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#44) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for financial hardship. Findings include: Resident 44 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia. The 10/9/23 NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) indicated Resident 44's skilled days ended on 10/11/23. The resident's POA (Power of Attorney) was informed Resident 44's long-term care would begin 10/12/23. Review of Resident 44's medical record indicated the resident remained in the facility pending Medicaid. There was no further documentation indicating advance beneficiary information was provided to the resident's POA. On 11/29/23 at 9:12 AM Staff 16 (Social Services Director) stated Resident 44 was pending Medicaid and acknowledged the Resident's POA did not receive advance beneficiary information, including the daily cost if Medicaid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a resident for 2 of 9 sampled residents (#s 14 and 35) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 34 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including quadriplegia. Resident 14 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including anxiety and obesity. The 12/6/22 admission MDS indicated Resident 14 was cognitively intact. Resident 35 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including obesity. The 5/30/23 admission MDS indicated Resident 35 was cognitively intact. A 7/19/23 facility investigation indicated on the evening of 7/19/23 an altercation occurred between Resident 34 with Resident 14 and Resident 35. Staff indicated Resident 34 was outside the shared room of Resident 14 and 35. Resident 34 indicated to staff she/he wanted to get back into bed and was waiting. Staff informed Resident 34 she/he would be assisted once they were done assisting Resident 14 and Resident 35. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report the results of an abuse investigation to the State Survey Agency within five business day to the State Agency for 2 of 9 sampled residents (#s 21 and 201) for abuse. This placed residents at risk for continued abuse. Findings include: A 9/2/23 Facility Reported Incident for abuse involving a staff member potentially abusing Residents 21 and 201 was submitted to the State Survey Agency. On 9/12/23 the State Survey Agency emailed the facility and requested the abuse investigation. On 9/13/23 the facility emailed the completed investigation to the State Agency. On 12/4/23 at 12:11 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the facility investigation was not reported to the State Survey Agency within five working days.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 8) reviewed for insulin. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of medication. Findings include: Resident 8 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including diabetes. The 9/29/23 physician order indicated Resident 8 was to receive NPH insulin 150 units twice daily. The 11/26/23 progress note indicated the morning nurse was unable to give the insulin due to it being unavailable. The 11/26/23 Diabetic Administration Record indicated Resident 8's CBG was 265 at 5:00 PM. There was no documented CBG for 8:00 AM. On 11/27/23 at 9:56 AM Resident 8 stated she/he did not receive NPH Insulin on the morning of 11/26/23 because the nurse could not find it. On 12/3/23 at 7:08 PM Staff 25 (LPN) stated she worked the morning of 11/26/23 and Resident 8's insulin was not available in the treatment cart or the facility emergency kit. Staff 25 stated she called the pharmacy to have it sent stat, but there was a delay, and it did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate care and services for a feeding tube for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#42) reviewed for feeding tubes. This placed residents at risk for complications related to the use of a feeding tube including infection. Findings include: Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with a PEG tube in place (tube feed) and diagnoses including stroke and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). According to the 6/2014 National Library of Medicine, the PEG tube (a feeding tube placed in your stomach held by a balloon that is inflated with sterile water), along with T-tacks (buttons on the exterior skin that help hold the stomach up against the abdominal wall) was inserted during the resident's 7/7/23 hospitalization for dysphagia secondary to stroke based on the resident's lack of ability to safely consume fluids. A 7/7/23 hospital discharge summary stated the T-tacks were to be removed at an outpatient clinic in four weeks. The clinic's phone number was provided for the facility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, assists to keep breathing airways open while sleeping) mask was in good repair for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#14) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for lack of respiratory care. Findings include: Resident 14 admitted to the facility 2022 with diagnoses including sleep apnea. A 6/28/23 physician order indicated Resident 14's CPAP mask was to be checked for damage and/or non-function. The 8/4/23 Care Plan indicated Resident 14 had difficulty breathing related to sleep apnea. The goal was for the resident to have no signs of poor oxygen absorption. On 11/27/23 at 8:18 AM the front of Resident 14's CPAP mask was observed to be held together entirely with layers of white surgical tape. A portion of the front mask tubing was broken off. On 11/27/23 at 8:19 AM Resident 14 stated she/he needed help getting medical equipment. The resident stated her/his CPAP mask strap was broken and she/he had asked for a new one for months.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident narcotic drug records were accurate for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#28) reviewed for narcotic medication. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate clinical records related to narcotics and drug diversion. Findings include: Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including hypertension. The 1/11/23 physician order indicated Resident 28 was to receive the following: -oxycodone 5 mg twice daily for pain; -oxycodone 5 mg every 24 hours PRN pain. The 6/2023 MARs and narcotic logs were reviewed, and the following discrepancies were noted: -On 6/3/23 oxycodone 5 mg was signed out on the narcotic log but not on the MAR. -On 6/12/23 oxycodone 5 mg was signed out on the narcotic log but not on the MAR. -On 6/16/23 oxycodone 5 mg was signed out as administered at 12:01 AM and 5:00 PM on the narcotic log but not on the MAR. The MAR indicated oxycodone was administered at 10:26 PM but it was not documented on the narcotic log. -The narcotic log indicated oxycodone 6/_/23 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendations were considered for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 4 and 12) reviewed for medication. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary medication. Findings include: 1. Resident 12 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including depression and insomnia. A physician order dated 10/16/22 indicated the use of bupropion (antidepressant) every morning and at bedtime. A pharmacy recommendation completed between 11/1/23 and 11/3/23 for Resident 12 indicated a recommendation to administer Wellbutrin (bupropion) twice daily with at least eight hours apart, the last dose no later than 5:00 PM to help reduce the risk of insomnia. A review of Resident 12's medical record revealed no documentation of a physician response or consideration of the pharmacy recommendation. A review of Resident 12's 11/2023 MAR indicated the resident received bupropion in the morning and at bedtime. Resident 12 received bupropion after 5:00 PM on 18 occasions. On 11/30/23 at 11:04 AM Staff 7 (Regional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's use of Dilantin (seizure medication) was monitored for toxicity levels for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects and toxicity. Findings include: Pfizer, the manufacturer of Dilantin (phenytoin) recommended: Therapeutic drug monitoring of phenytoin is necessary to ensure therapeutic and nontoxic levels. Resident 4 was readmitted to the facility in 6/2021 with diagnoses including epilepsy (a seizure disorder) and a stroke. Resident 4's 10/18/23 Quarterly MDS did not contain a BIMS score. Resident 4 resided in the Memory Care Unit. Resident 4's 11/2023 MARs revealed: Dilantin (phenytoin) oral suspension 125mg/5ml. Give 5 ml by mouth every morning and at bedtime related to epilepsy. There was no order for serum blood work to monitor Dilantin levels. Resident 4's 11/2023 Care Plan indicated the resident had impaired cognition and had epilepsy managed by anticonvulsant medications. The Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were three errors in 25 opportunities resulting in a 12 percent error rate for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: Resident 12 was readmitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including Quadriplegia and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The 11/25/23 physician orders included the following: -Advair Diskus Inhalation Aerosol Powder (asthma medication) 250-50 MCG/ACT. One puff inhale orally two times a day related to COPD. Rinse mouth after every use. -Lidocaine External Patch 5%. Apply to right neck topically one time a day for pain. Leave on for 12 hours, then off for 12 hours. -Movantik (treat constipation caused by opioids) Oral Tablet 25 MG. Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Give before breakfast. On 12/1/23 at 9:40 AM Staff 31 (CMA) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete laboratory monitoring as ordered for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#37) reviewed for lab orders. This placed residents at risk for worsening conditions. Findings include: Resident 37 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke. The 4/11/23 physician order indicated Resident 37 was to have a urinalysis with culture completed for possible UTI. The 4/11/23 TAR indicated Staff 8 (LPN) obtained the urinalysis at 10:06 PM. The 4/24/23 facility investigation indicated Staff 8 documented a urinalysis was completed on 4/11/23 for Resident 37, but he did not collect the urinalysis. On 11/28/23 at 3:03 PM Staff 8 stated he recalled working with Resident 37 on 4/11/23. Staff 8 stated he did not collect a urinalysis for Resident 37, but documented it as completed. On 12/1/23 at 2:31 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged Staff 8 documented a urinalysis was completed on 4/11/23 for Resident 37, but he did not collect the urinalysis.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure records were accurate and complete for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#37) reviewed for lab orders. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate medical records. Findings include: Resident 37 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke. The 4/11/23 physician order indicated Resident 37 was to have a urinalysis with culture completed for possible UTI. The 4/2023 TARs indicated Staff 8 (LPN) obtained the urinalysis at 10:06 PM. The 4/24/23 facility investigation indicated Staff 8 documented a urinalysis was completed on 4/11/23 for Resident 37, but he did not collect the urinalysis. On 11/28/23 at 3:03 PM Staff 8 stated he recalled working with Resident 37 on 4/11/23. Staff 8 stated he did not collect a urinalysis for Resident 37, but documented it as completed. On 12/1/23 at 2:31 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged Staff 8 documented a urinalysis was completed on 4/11/23 for Resident 37, but did not collect the urinalysis. Staff 1 acknowledged the medical record was inaccurate.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
1. Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program and conduct a risk analysis assessment for potential areas of growth and spread of potentially hazardous microorganisms. This placed residents at risk for water borne infections. Findings include: On 10/18/22 at 1:51 PM Staff 4 (Maintenance Director) was asked about the facility's water management program including a risk assessment related to potential areas of Legionella growth. Staff 4 stated he was not aware of a program. A few minutes later, Staff 4 showed the surveyor blank pages of a potential water management program and stated he would talk with Staff 1 (Administrator) to determine if there was a developed and implemented system. On 10/18/22 at 2:14 PM Staff 4 confirmed the facility did not have a developed and implemented water management program. On 10/21/22 at 9:20 AM Staff 2 (DNS) and Staff 13 (Corporate Operations) were informed of the lack of a facility water management program. No further information was provided. 2. Based on interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the building was maintained in good repair for 12 of 40 resident rooms (#s 17, 20, 29, 30, 35, 36, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 and 44) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for an unhomelike environment. Findings include: Observations on 10/17/22 and 10/18/22 revealed the following: - rooms 17, 36, 40, 42, and 43 had wall damage with exposed sheetrock; - rooms 20, 39, 44 and the window outside Staff 16's (RNCM) office had blinds with missing or damaged slats; - rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had missing or damaged floor tiles in the path of ambulation; - and rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had large stains or uncleaned areas on the floor. On 10/19/22 at 12:30 Staff 4 (Maintenance director) confirmed the floors, walls and blinds needed repair or replacement and had known that for a while. 2. On 10/17/22 at 10:57 AM Resident 29's room floor was observed to be sticky and dirty in the area from the right side of the resident's bed to the wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safe self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 sampled residents (# 29) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: Resident 29 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including diabetes and stroke. The facility Self-Administration of Medications policy and procedure, last revised 3/2020, stated the following: -Medications at beside are stored in closed, locked cupboards or drawers. This includes over the counter medications. -No medications are stored at beside nor self-administered until an evaluation is complete. -A physician order is obtained indicating the specific medications the resident is able to self-administer. Observations from 10/17/22 through 10/21/22 between the hours of 8:00 AM through 3:30 PM revealed Resident 29 had unsecured eye drops on the beside table or sitting on a stack of boxes in the corner of her/his room. Resident 29 was also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders related to insulin for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#29) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for low blood sugar. Findings include: Resident 29 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including diabetes and stroke. A 1/11/22 physician order indicated Resident 29 was prescribed Humalog 10 units subcutaneously in the evening. Hold for CBGs less than 120 or if resident consumes less than 50% of meal. Give an additional PRN dose if glucose is greater than 300; notify provider if glucose is greater than 400. An 8/20/22 physician order indicated Resident 29 was prescribed Humalog 8 units subcutaneously one time a day. Hold for CBGs less than 120. Call the medical provider if CBG is less than 90. (This insulin was scheduled for AM administration.) A review of Resident 29's 9/2022 and 10/2022 Diabetic Administration Records (DARs) indicated the following times when the resident received Humalog insulin when the resident's blood sugars were less than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately and consistently assess a pressure ulcer for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening or delayed healing of pressure ulcers. Findings include: CMS Appendix PP revision 207 dated 9/30/22 defined the following: - Pressure Ulcer/Injury (PU/PI) refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. A pressure injury will present as intact skin and may be painful. A pressure ulcer will present as an open ulcer, the appearance of which will vary depending on the stage and may be painful. The injury occurs as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination with shear. The tolerance of soft tissue for pressure and shear may also be affected by skin temperature and moisture, nutrition, perfusion, co-morbidities and condition of the soft tissue. - Eschar is dead…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident care equipment was maintained in safe operating condition for 2 of 6 residents (#s 13 and 29) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include: 1. On 10/17/22 at 1:06 PM Resident 13 was observed speaking to Staff 20 (Dietary Manager). Resident 13 stated her/his wheelchair was broken, told everyone her/his wheelchair was broken, but was told maintenance did not repair wheelchairs. Resident 13 further stated the exercise bike in the therapy department was also broken and maintenance could not repair that either. On 10/17/22 at 1:46 PM Resident 13's wheelchair was observed and the material on the back of the wheelchair was torn. On 10/18/22 at 5:29 PM Staff 18 (Director of Rehab) stated she made the facility aware of the broken exercise machine on 9/13/22 and 9/20/22, and her staff made Staff 4 (Maintenance Director) aware on 9/20/22. On 10/20/22 at 1:05 PM Staff 4 stated all facility staff should have access to log a repair request in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-03-28 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to post accurate and complete staffing information for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for required staff postings. This placed residents and the public at risk for incomplete and inaccurate staffing information. Findings include: A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports from 1/1/25 through 3/18/25 revealed 5 of 76 days when portions of the form were left blank or were inaccurate. The incomplete or inaccurate information included daily census, and the number of working staff. The dates included: -1/14/25 -1/20/25 -1/29/25 -2/19/25 -3/5/25 On 3/26/25 at 8:57 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports were incomplete and inaccurate for the identified dates.
- No harm found · B2025-03-28 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure transfer notices with appeal rights were provided in writing to residents and their representatives for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#31) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of information regarding their options and rights. Findings include: Resident 31 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including a cerebral infarction (a condition where brain tissue dies from lack of blood flow) and a UTI. A review of Resident 31's health record revealed she/he was transferred to the hospital on 3/18/25. No evidence was found in Resident 31's health record to indicate a transfer notice with appeal rights was provided in writing to the resident or their representative upon transfer to the hospital. On 3/26/25 at 2:20 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated transfer notifications with appeal rights were not provided to residents or their representatives when residents transferred to the hospital.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$54,581 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $14,788 — penalty dated 2025-01-07
- $39,793 — penalty dated 2023-12-04
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRUIST BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 09/01/2024 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/10/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/10/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/10/2024 |
| MORRIS, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/30/2025 |
| NYSSEN, SARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2024 |
| PARK, TREVOR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/30/2025 |
| NEWBERG 1900 REALTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $708K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385199. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.