Monroeville Post Acute
885 Macbeth Drive, Monroeville, PA 15146 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 131 certified beds · (412) 856-7071 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (78) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $49,558 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-16)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.1% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 23.9% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 9.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.8% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.5% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.8% | 25.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.1% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.1% | 68.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.0% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.6% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.52 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.80 | 1.18 | 1.80 | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.1%CMS range 43.4–63.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 8.4–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 67.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 78.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 9.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.0–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 131 beds and averages 105.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
78 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 65 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from neglect that resulted in the actual harm of a hematoma (pooling of blood under the skin) and a facial laceration that required sutures for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated 11/1/24, indicated that residents have the right to be free of neglect. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/7/25, included diagnoses of achondroplasia (a disorder of that prevents the changing of cartilage to bone), muscle weakness, and repeated falls. Review of the MDS dated [DATE], Section GG: Functional Abilities indicated Resident R1 utilized a wheelchair, had lower extremity impairment on both sides, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls that resulted in the actual harm of a hematoma (pooling of blood under the skin) and a facial laceration that required sutures for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Supporting Activities of Daily Living (ADL) dated 11/1/24, indicated Residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/7/25, included diagnoses of achondroplasia (a disorder that prevents the changing of cartilage to bone), muscle weakness, and repeated falls. Review of the MDS dated [DATE], Section GG: Functional Abilities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and facility provided documents, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls that resulted in the actual harm of a facial laceration requiring two sutures for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Supporting Activities of Daily Living (ADL) dated 11/1/24, indicated Residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) . Review of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine - Caregiver Guide and Instructions for Safe Bed Mobility published 4/28/17, indicated bed mobility refers to activities such as scooting in bed, rolling, side-lying to sitting, and sitting to lying down. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for medication administration for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration-Preparation and General Guidelines, dated 3/6/26 indicated that medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, bipolar disorder, paranoid personality disorder, adjustment disorder, conduct disorder, and atopic neurodermatitis (severe itching of the skin). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/2/25, indicated the diagnoses remained current and the resident is alert and oriented and independent with all activities of daily living (ADL's). A review of a physician order dated 3/23/26,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and comfortable environment in one of twelve resident rooms (Resident 100) and one of two unit lounges (second floor).Findings include:Review of facility policy Homelike Environment dated 6/20/25, indicated the residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. This includes a clean, sanitary, and orderly environment. Review of facility policy Bathrooms dated 6/20/25, revealed bathrooms shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and shall be cleaned on a daily basis.Review of facility policy Bedpan/Urinal, Offering/Removing dated 6/20/25, indicated after a resident uses the bedpan staff are to empty the bedpan into the commode. Flush the commode. Clean the bedpan. Wipe dry and clean with a paper towel. Store the bedpan per facility policy. Do not leave it in the bathroom or on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medications were properly stored and/or disposed of in two of four medication carts (First Floor-South/East Hall, Second Floor-South/East Hall).Finding include:Review of facility policy Medication Storage in the Facility: Storage of Medications dated [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE], stated that medications and biologicals that have an expired date on the label, have been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines are stored separate from other medications until destroyed or returned to the pharmacy or supplier. The policy further stated that multiple dose injectable vials and ophthalmics, once opened, require an expiration date shorter than the manufacturer ' s expiration date to insure medication purity and potency.During an observation of the first-floor medication cart on [DATE], at approximately 8:55 a.m. the following was observed:-(1) bottle of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of resident and staff interviews, and grievance review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 14 of 20 residents (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10. R11, R12, R13, and R14).Findings include: During an interview on 8/10/25, at 2:40 p.m. when asked if he felt the facility maintained enough staff to care for resident needs, Resident R1 stated, No. Resident R1 stated that call light response takes a long time. During an interview on 8/10/25, at 2:42 p.m. when asked if he felt the facility maintained enough staff to care for resident needs, Resident R2 stated, Could be better. During an interview on 8/10/25, at 2:43 p.m. when asked if he felt the facility maintained enough staff to care for resident needs, Resident R3 stated, Not at all. Resident R2 further stated that call light response times can be long and he waits a long time for assistance to get out of bed. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan related to falls for one of five residents (Residents R15). This was identified as past non-compliance.Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Fall Risk Assessment dated 6/20/25, indicated, The nursing staff, in conjunction with the attending physician, consultant pharmacist, therapy staff, and others, will seek to identify and document resident risk factors for falls and establish a resident-centered falls prevention plan based on relevant assessment information. Review of the facility policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 6/20/25, indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the minimum data set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to institute corrective actions and resolve resident grievances for seven of fifteen residents (Resident R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, and R8). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Filing Grievances/Complaints dated 11/1/24, indicated the administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the residents and/or representatives. The administrator will review the findings with the grievance officer to determine what corrective actions, if any, need to be taken. Review of facility grievances filed in January 2025, revealed the following: -On 1/15/24, Resident R2 had voiced a concern about not being assisted to shower and not receiving nail care. -On 1/15/24, Resident R3 had voiced a concern about not being assisted to shower. -On 1/15/24, Resident R4 had voiced a concern about not being assisted to shower. -On 1/15/24, Resident R5 had voiced a concern about not being assisted to shower. -On 1/15/24, Resident R6 had voiced a concern about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to investigate possible abuse and/or neglect for two of four residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated 11/1/24, indicated residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, effective October 2024, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, observations, and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for nine of 16 residents (Residents R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R20, and R23). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, effective October 2024, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of the facility policy Supporting Activities of Daily Living (ADL) dated 11/1/24, indicated appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility policy, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document meal consumption for two of two residents observed. (Residents R9 and R10). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Meals - Feeding the Resident dated 11/1/24, indicated the percentage of the diet consumed is recorded. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/30/25, included diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), anemia (too little iron in the body causing fatigue), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident R9's care plan for nutritional risk due to dementia and a mechanically altered diet initiated 6/20/24, included the intervention of Monitor intake at all meals. Review of Resident R9's ADL Care Record indicated that Amount…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of state laws, facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to report allegations of neglect for one of four residents (Resident R122). Findings include: Review of the Older Adult Protective Services Act of 11/6/87, amended by Act 1997-13, Chapter 7, Section 701, requires any employee or administrator of a facility who suspects abuse is mandated to report the abuse. All reports of abuse should be reported to the local area agency on aging and licensing agencies. Review of the facility's policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated 11/1/24, indicated the facility will investigate and report any allegations withing timeframes required by federal requirements. Review of abuse education provided to facility staff defined abuse as willful mistreatment that can be verbal, sexual, physical, or mental. The education further stated that employees of nursing homes are mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 65 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record, and staff and family interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medically-related social services related to a resident transfer for one of three residents (Resident R11). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, effective October 2024, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of the facility policy, Social Services dated 11/1/24, indicated the facility provides medically-related social services to assure each resident can attain or maintain his/her highest practicable physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being. The social worker / social services staff are responsible for helping residents with transitions of care services (for example, community placement options, home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medications were properly secured in one of three two of seven medication carts (First-floor medication cart for rooms 100-117) Findings include: Review of the facility policy Security of Medication Cart dated 11/1/24, indicated medication carts must be securely locked at all times when out of the nurse ' s view. During an observation on 2/8/24, at 2:18 p.m. of the the 100-117 medication cart was observed unlocked. The surveyor remained with the medication cart. At approximately 2:22 p.m. the surveyor opened and the medication cart drawers, and observed that the narcotic drawer was not secured. The surveyor reviewed the narcotic book, and narcotic cards. At 2:30 p.m. Registered Nurse Employee E4 was requested to confirm that the medication cart and the narcotic drawer were both unsecured. During an interview on 2/11/25, at approximately 3:00 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to restrain hair and failed to perform handing washing to prevent the potential for cross contamination in the Kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices reviewed 11/1/24, indicated food and nutritional services employees follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. Employees must wash their hands after handling soiled equipment or utensils. Hair nets or caps and/or beard restraints are worn when cooking, preparing, or assembling food to keep hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils, and linens. Review of facility policy Policies and Procedures - Infection Prevention and Control reviewed 11/1/24, indicated the facility adopted infection prevention and control policies and procedures intended to help maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment and care to promote dignity for each resident's quality of life for two of 16 sampled residents (Resident R47 and R36). Findings: Review of facility policy Dignity reviewed 11/1/24, indicated each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated that a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) is a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. Scores from a BIMS assessment suggests the following distributions: 13 - 15: cognitively intact 8 - 12: moderately impaired 0 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, and grievance review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 17 of 17 residents (Residents R10, R16, R59, R105, R27, R36, R318, R500, R501, R502, R503, R504, R505, R506, R507, R508, and R509. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Call System dated 11/1/24, indicated calls for assistance are answered as soon as possible. During an observation on 12/16/24, at 2:40 p.m., the call light for Resident R59 was noted to be alarming. During an interview on 12/16/24, at 2:46 p.m. Resident R59 was asked why she needed help, and she responded that she was thirsty, and hadn't had a drink. During an observation on 12/16/24, at 2:51 p.m. Registered Nurse (RN) Employee was observed walking by Resident R59's room door and looking inside. When it appeared that she noted the State Agency (SA) in the room, stopped abruptly, looked up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to routinely offer or make available evening snacks as desired by nine of ten oriented residents (Residents R500, R501, R502, R503, R504, R505, R507, R508, and R509). Findings include: A review of facility policy Snacks (Between Meal and Bedtime), Serving dated 3/15/24. Indicates the purpose is to provide the resident with adequate nutrition. Facility staff report any problems or complaints made by the resident related to the snack. Report other information in accordance with the facility policy and professional standards of practice. Review of facility Snack Audits conducted during the months of August and September 2024 revealed only the volume and itemized list of snacks that were delivered to the nursing units. During a resident group interview on 12/17/24, at 10:30 a.m., nine of ten residents in attendance stated that they are not consistently offered a nourishing evening snack and there are not enough snacks for those who request them (Residents R500, R501,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medical records on each resident are complete and accurately documented for two of six residents (Resident R106 and R42). Findings include: Review of facility policy Charting and Documentation dated 3/15/2024, indicated Documentation of procedures and treatments shall include care-specific details and shall include at a minimum, whether the resident refused the procedure/treatment, signature, and title of individual documenting. Review of Resident R106's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R106's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/15/24, indicated diagnoses of pressure ulcer (PU) of sacral region, pressure ulcer of left hip (open wound with tissue damage), paraplegia (paralysis of the lower half of the body) and severe protein calorie malnutrition (not enough protein and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain hospice records for three out of five residents receiving hospice services (Resident R2, R72, and R92). Findings include: The facility Hospice Services Agreement policy dated 8/28/23, indicated that the facility will participate in hospice care as an approach for terminally ill residents. The facility must ensure that the hospice services meet professional standards and principles that apply to individuals providing services in the facility. Review of facility policy Hospice Program reviewed 3/15/24 and 11/1/24, indicated hospice services are available ro residents at the end of life. Collaborating with hospice representatives and coordinating staff participation in the hospice care planning, communicating with hospice representatives and other healthcare providers participating in the provision of care for the terminal illness, related conditions to ensure quality of care for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment on one of six nursing units (One East nursing unit) and for two of two residents (Residents R35 and R4). Findings include: During an observation on 12/20/24, at 11:00 a.m., of the One East nursing unit (Room of R4 and R35) the ceiling tile above the toilet revealed a large brown colored stain. During an interview on 12/20/24, at 11:05 a.m., Resident R35 stated The ceiling leaks down the wall and onto the floor. It's been going on for a long time. During an interview on 12/20/24 at 11:05 a.m., Resident R4 stated They changed the tile 3 times and it keeps happening. During an interview on 12/20/24 at 11:30 a.m., The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the above findings and that the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable homelike environment on One East nursing. 28 Pa. Code: 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility. 28 Pa. Code: 201.29(k) Resident rights.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident record, investigation documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect for one of four sampled residents (Resident R166). Findings include: A review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating policy dated 11/1/24, indicated that the facility will thoroughly investigate and report all allegations of abuse/neglect and will report to the Administrator and other officials as required. A review of Resident R166's admission record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included fracture of the cervical (neck) vertebrae, high blood pressure, and pain. Resident R166 discharged to home on [DATE]. A review of Resident R166's Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/12/24, indicated that the diagnoses were current upon review and the resident was alert, oriented, and cognitively intact. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are thoroughly investigated and the results of all investigations are reported to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within five working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified appropriate corrective action must be taken for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident R166). A review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating policy dated 11/1/24, indicated that the facility will thoroughly investigate all allegations of abuse/neglect and will report to the Administrator and other officials as required. A review of Resident R166's admission record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included fracture of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R106). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Oxygen Administration, with a review date of 3/15/24, purpose is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. This includes verification of a physician order for oxygen or facility protocol, portable oxygen, regulator checking equipment and periodic assessment. The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated that a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) is a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. Scores from a BIMS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medications were properly stored and/or disposed of in one of two medication rooms (First Floor medication room). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Labeling and Storage dated 11/1/24, stated that if the facility has discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items. During an observation of the First Floor medication room on 12/16/24, at 2:05 p.m. the following was observed: -(1) vacutainer with an expiration date of 5/31/23. -(2) vacutainers with an expiration date of 11/30/23. -(34) vacutainers with an expiration date of 2/29/24. -(6) vacutainers with an expiration date of 3/31/24. -(10) vacutainers with an expiration date of 4/30/24. -(6) vacutainers with an expiration date of 8/31/24. -(5) vacutainers with an expiration date of 9/30/24. -(1) I.V. start kit with an expiration date of 2/29/24. -(6) Bacterial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-30 · tag F0557 — widespreadHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience to the residents during the lunch meal service on October 15, 2024, as required. Findings include: During an observation on 10/15/24, at 10:45 am it was revealed that the facility was utilizing disposable styrofoam bowls to serve the residents their dessert (cinnamon apples) for the lunch meal. During an interview on 11/15/24, at 10:57 am [NAME] Employee E1 confirmed that the facility was utilizing disposable styrofoam bowls to serve the residents their lunch dessert. During an interview on 10/15/24, at 11:15 am Food Service Director Employee E2 confirmed that the facility failed to maintain a supply of china or thermal serving bowls and was utilizing disposable styrofoam bowls to serve residents their dessert which failed to provide the resident with a dignified dining experience as required. PA Code: 201.29(k) Resident rights.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-30 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — widespreadHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a method for resident visitors to easily access the facility to permit visitation of the resident during off hours (Saturday 10/26/24). as required. Findings include: During an observation on 10/26/24, at 9:18 a.m., the State Agency (SA) attempted to enter the facility. Upon entering the foyer area of the facility there was secured double doors preventing access to the facility. The SA attempted to gain access to the facility by activation of the intercom located on the right of the double doors. Upon activation a door bell sounded. No staff member responded to the door bell or the activated intercom. A notice displayed on the left side double door indicated that during off hours to call the facility's main telephone number that was provided on the posting. The surveyor placed a telephone call to this number. The telephone rang for approximately two minutes and then disconnected failing to be answered by staff or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-30 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility documents, an audit conducted by the State Ombudsman Office and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman office of residents transfers and discharges for 42 of 42 months (3/21, 4/21, 5/21, 6/21, 7/21, 8/21, 9/21, 10/21, 11/21, 12/21, 1/22, 2/22, 3/22, 4/22, 5/22, 6/22, 7/22, 8/22, 9/22, 10/22, 11/22, 12/22, 1/23, 2/23, 3/23, 4/23, 5/23, 6/23, 7/23, 8/23, 9/23, 10/23, 11/23, 12/23, 1/24, 2/24, 3/24, 5/24, 6/24, 7/24, 8/24 and 9/24) as required. Finding include: A request to review facility documents on 10/15/24, of the facility's compliance in notifying the State Ombudsman Office revealed that the facility failed to provide documented evidence of notifying the State Ombudsman Office of residents transfers and discharges for the time period of 3/21, through 9/24. A review of an audit conducted on 8/1/24, by the State Ombudsman Office revealed that the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman Office of resident transfers and discharges since 2/10/21. During an interview on 10/15/24, at 1:00 pm the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide the residents with a homelike environment in room [ROOM NUMBER], the second floor Dining Room, the first floor resident lounge, and the second floor resident lounge. (room [ROOM NUMBER], Second floor Dining Room, First Floor resident lounge, and second floor resident lounge). Findings include: During an observation on 10/26/24, at 11:20 am it was revealed that the ceiling tile for the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] contained a wet spot and brown markings indicating prior leaking water. The ceiling tile was located over the toilet. During an interview on 10/26/24, at 11:25 am Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E5 confirmed that the ceiling tile contained brown marks indicating prior leaks and a current wet spot. A review of facility maintenance work orders revealed that a work order was submitted for the repair of the leak and replacement of ceiling tile in room [ROOM NUMBER] due to the resident voicing a concern…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain in proper working order equipment used for two of two methods for visitors to gain entrance to the facility during off hours. (Intercom system and Telephone system) Findings include: During an observation on 10/26/24, at 9:18 a. m., which was a Saturday morning, it was revealed that the intercom system used to notify staff of a visitor requesting access to the facility was not functioning properly. It was revealed that the intercom located at the first floor nursing unit had been removed from the wall which left exposed wire hanging from the wall and the nursing staff the inability to respond to an activated intercom and the visitor to gain access to the facility. During an observation on 10/26/24, at 9:20 am it was revealed that the facility's telephone number when unanswered by staff would disconnect and failed to transfer the call to another telephone extension which created the inability for the visitor to gain access to the facility. During an interview on 10/26/24, at 11:00 am the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party of two of two room changes (Resident R2) as required. Finding include: During a review of Resident R2's census record it was revealed that the resident had two room changes on 10/16/24. Census records indicated that Resident R2 was moved from room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A to room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A and then to room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A. A review of Resident R2's progress notes failed to provide evidence that the facility notified the resident's guardian/responsible party of the room changes. During an interview on 10/18/24, at 1:41 pm Resident R2's Guardian/Responsible Party RP1 confirmed that the facility failed to notify her of Resident R2's room changes. During an interview on 10/26/24, at 11:00 am information regarding the facility's failure to notify Resident R2's guardian/responsible party of the two room changes was addressed with the Nursing Home Administrator and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, documents and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly complete the grievance process for two of two resident allegations regarding the misappropriation of the resident's personal property. (Resident R1 and R3). Findings include: A review of facility Grievances/Concerns policy dated 9/10/24, indicated that the facility implements a grievance process by creating a grievance form, documents steps taken to investigate the grievance, complies a summary of the findings or conclusions, confirms a decision of either confirmed or unconfirmed, documents corrective action taken and dates when the resolution was issued. During a review of facility grievance documents on 10/15/24, it was revealed that the facility created a grievance form on 7/26/24, as the result of Resident R1's allegation that the maintenance department threw away her glasses. The grievance form provided no documentation of the findings of the facility's investigation, a summary of the findings, a decision of confirmed or unconfirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility provided policies and documentation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from neglect of services for seven of 14 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7). Review of the facility policy Abuse Prohibition dated 7/24/24, previously reviewed 3/11/24, indicated the facility will prohibit abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation. The policy defined neglect as the failure, indifference, or disregard of the Center, its employees, or service providers to provide care, comfort, safety, goods and services to a patient that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Review of the facility provided Wound Care Report dated 7/22/24, had handwritten notes on it. During an interview on 8/4/24, at 1:45 p.m. Wound Care Nurse Employee E1 stated that the report is the results of the wound rounds on 7/22/24; it was utilized as a reference on 7/29/24, and the handwritten information was the notes and changes from the wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the care of wounds for three of seven residents (Resident R1, R3, and R4). The facility policy Skin Integrity and Wound Management dated 7/24/24, previously reviewed 3/11/24, indicated the facility will provide safe and effective care to promote optimal skin health, prevent pressure injuries, and promote healing within the context of what matters most to all patients. Review of the facility provided Wound Care Report dated 7/22/24, had handwritten notes on it. During an interview on 8/4/24, at 1:45 p.m. Wound Care Nurse Employee E1 stated that the report is the results of the wound rounds on 7/22/24; it was utilized as a reference on 7/29/24, and the handwritten information was the notes and changes from the wound round of 7/29/24. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and documents, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the care of pressure ulcers for two of five residents (Resident R1 and R2). Findings include: Review of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality's, Safety Program for Nursing Home: On-Time Pressure Ulcer Prevention dated May 2016, indicated that Pressure ulcers cause pain, disfigurement, and increased infection risk and are associated with longer hospital stays and increased morbidity and mortality. Three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers were listed: comprehensive skin assessments, standardized pressure ulcer risk assessments, and care planning and implementation to address areas of risk. Review of the National Library of Medicine, The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk indicated the scale was developed to foster early identification of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, and grievance review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 13 of 15 residents (Residents R6, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, and R20). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Staffing/Center Plan dated 7/24/24, previously reviewed 3/11/24, indicated centers will provide qualified and appropriate staffing levels to meet the needs of the patient population. The staffing plan will include all shifts, seven days per week. During an interview on 8/4/24, at 3:30 p.m. Resident R6, when asked if she felt the facility maintained sufficient staff, stated, If they show up. During an interview on 8/4/24, at 3:57 p.m. Resident R9, when asked if she felt the facility maintained sufficient staff, stated, No and further stated that she felt that she required more personal care than was provided. When asked if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy and documents, observation, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the provision of a substantial evening snack to the residents when up to 16 hours elapsed from the supper meal to breakfast the next day, and failed to [NAME] resident group acceptance of a meal span of greater than 14 hours. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Meal Times and Delivery dated 7/24/24, previously reviewed 3/11/24, indicated Meals are provided at predictable time, three times daily. Meals are spaced not greater than 14 hours between the evening meal and breakfast meal. Review of facility's scheduled meal care delivery times revealed the following: Breakfast: First meal cart delivery at 7:00 a.m. - 7:15 a.m. (Rooms 100-119). Lunch: First meal cart delivery at 11:30 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. (Rooms 100-119). Dinner: First meal cart delivery at 4:45 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. (Rooms 100-119). During an observation on 8/4/24, at 3:53 p.m. the evening meal began to be distributed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-26 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to schedule ordered appointments for three of five residents (Resident R1, R2, and R3). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 2/3/24, included diagnoses of end stage renal disease (ESRD, an inability of the kidneys to filter the blood), atrial fibrillation (disease of the heart characterized by irregular and often faster heartbeat), and dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). Review of facility census information indicated Resident R1 was hospitalized from [DATE], through 1/23/24. Review of hospital discharge paperwork dated on 1/23/24, at 3:54 p.m. indicated that Resident R1 was to follow-up with a pulmonologist in four weeks (approximately 2/20/24). Review of Resident R1's clinical record failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-11 · tag F0836 — patternEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility documents, invoices, account payable ledgers, vendor account receivable ledgers, and vendor and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to pay invoices from their transportation vendor for six of six months (10/23, 11/23, 12/23, 1/24, 2/24, and 3/24) which caused the transportation vendor to terminate transport services to the residents. Finding include: 28 PA Code of the Pennsylvannia Department of Health, Long Term Care Facility Regulations, effective July 1, 2023, indicated that 201.14 subsection (g): A facility owner shall pay in a timely manner bills incurred in the operation of a facility that are not in dispute and that are for services without which the resident's health and safety are jeopardized. A review of facility documents it was revealed that on 3/1/24, the facility was notified by a dialysis center that Resident R1's transportation to return to the facility was cancelled due to non payment. A review on 3/11/24, of the transportation vendor's account receivable ledger revealed that the facility had unpaid past due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility provided information, clinical record, observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to consistently maintain resident safety during a transfer resulting in a laceration of the left leg for one of three residents (Resident R1), Findings include: Review of the facility policy Accidents/Incidents, last reviewed on 2/1/24, with a previous review date of 12/1/23, indicated that center staff will report, review and investigate all accidents/incidents. The nurse assessing the resident will document the accident/incident the patient's chart and include all pertinent information. The Director of Nursing(DON) and Administrator will review all the information for completion and report the incident. The root cause should be determined through a thorough investigation. Review of the facility Safe Resident Handling Program last reviewed on 2/1/24, with a previous review date of 12/1/23, indicated that all residents are evaluated on admission by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0575 — patternPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to display the contact information (name, address, email address, and phone number) for the local State Survey Agency and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal nursing facility regulation for six of six resident information areas (first floor elevator area, internet cafe, 100 unit, second floor elevator area, resident lounge, and 200 unit). Findings include: During an observation on 1/9/24, at 11:20 a.m. contact information was not displayed for the State Survey Agency, and there was no information that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal nursing facility regulation on the first floor elevator area. During an observation on 1/9/24, at 11:23 a.m. contact information was not displayed for the State Survey Agency, and there was no information that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to identify the current grievance official who is responsible for overseeing the grievance process necessary to take immediate action to prevent further potential violations of any resident right at six of six posting areas (first floor elevator area, internet cafe, 100 unit, second floor elevator area, second floor resident lounge, and 200 unit.) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Grievance Concerns last reviewed 9/1/23, informed a description of the procedure for voicing grievances/concerns will be on each unit in a prominent location and must include the contact information of the grievance official with whom a grievance can be filed, that is, their name, business address (mailing and email) and business phone number. During an observation on 1/9/24, at 11:20 a.m. the contact information for the current grievance official was not posted at the first floor elevator area. During an observation on 1/9/24, at 11:23 a.m. the contact information for the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide fundamental care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice to ensure each resident will meet the highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychological well-being by failing to follow physician orders for nutritional services for one of two residents (Resident R53), and failed to document wound care for four of seven residents with pressure ulcers (Residents R55, R71, R103 and R217) and failed to follow a physicians order to send one of four residents to a follow up appointment (Resident R71). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Nutrition/Hydration Care and Services last reviewed 9/1/23, informed staff will provide nutritional and hydration care services for each patient consistent with the patient's comprehensive care assessment and will provide a therapeutic diet that accounts for the patient's clinical conditions and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pain management consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of two residents (Resident R26). Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/9/23 included diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of progressive lung disorders characterized by increasing breathlessness). Review of Section J: Health Conditions revealed resident R26 is on a scheduled pain medication regimen. Review of the facility diagnosis list included an open wound of the abdominal wall and polyosteoarthritis (condition when five or more joints are affected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate dialysis communication forms and failed to maintain ongoing communication with the dialysis center (an outpatient treatment center for those with chronic kidney failure) for three of six residents. (Residents R20, R62, and R600). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Dialysis: Hemodialysis (HD) - Communication and Documentation, last reviewed on 9/1/23, informed staff will communicate with the certified dialysis facility regarding the ongoing assessment of the patient's condition by monitoring for complications before and after hemodialysis (a machine that filters waste from the blood when the kidneys are no longer able) treatments received at a certified dialysis facility. Prior to leaving the Center for HD, a licensed nurse will complete the top portion of the Hemodialysis Communication Record ot the state required form and send with the resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the clinical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation that it acted on the pharmacy recommendations two of five residents (Resident R26 and R92). Findings include: Review of Resident R26's and Resident R92's clinical records indicated Pharmacist Medication Regimen Reviews completed at least monthly. Review of Resident R26's reviews completed on 8/9/23, 9/11/23, 10/26/23, 11/5/23, 11/27/23, and 12/28/23, all indicated Comment/Recommendation noted - see report. Review of Resident R92's reviews completed on 9/11/23, 10/26/23, 11/27/23, and 12/28/23, all indicated Comment/Recommendation noted - see report. On 1/10/24, the pharmacist reports were requested from the facility. The recommendations were not received. During an interview on 1/12/24, at 2:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide documentation that it acted on the pharmacy recommendations two of five residents. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, water testing logs and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective Water Management Program for the prevention and control of water-borne contaminants, such as Legionella (a bacteria that may cause Legionnaires' Disease, a serious type of pneumonia) for ten of twelve months(April 2023 through January 2024). Findings include: The facility has no Water Management Program based on framework outlined in ASHRAE and CDC Standards identified as per the Maintenance Director Employee E3 and confirmed with the Nursing Home Administrator to minimize risk for Legionella associated with the building water systems at Monroeville Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. During an interview on 1/11/24, at 1:15 p.m., Maintenance Director Employee E3 and the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility did not implement and effective water management program for the prevention and control of water-borne contaminants, such as Legionella since 2022. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on resident protection from abuse and neglect for 13 of 15 staff members (Employees E7, E8, E9, E10, E12, E13, E14, E15, E16, E17, E18, E19, and E20). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 11/28/23, indicated that all employees will receive training and education on abuse protection during general orientation. Review of the policy Inservice Training dated 9/1/23, indicated the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel on a regularly scheduled basis. All mandatory inservices must be completed annually as a condition of employment. Review of personnel files for newly hired Employees E7, E8, E9, and E10 revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on resident protection from abuse and neglect. Activities Employee E7 had a hire date of 10/2/23, failed to have documentation of training in resident protection from abuse and neglect completed upon hire. Dietary Employee E8 had a hire date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on infection control procedures for six of ten staff members (Employees E12, E13, E14, E17, E18, and E19). Findings include: Review of the policy Inservice Training dated 9/1/23, indicated the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel on a regularly scheduled basis. All mandatory inservices must be completed annually as a condition of employment. Review of facility provided documents and training record for Employees E12, E13, E14, E17, E18, and E19 revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on infection control procedures . Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E12 had a hire date of 9/27/07, failed to have infection control procedures in-service education between 9/27/22, and 9/27/23. NA Employee E13 had a hire date of 8/19/21, failed to have infection control procedures in-service education between 8/19/22, and 8/19/23. NA Employee E14 had a hire date of 1/3/19, failed to have infection control procedures in-service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, staff education records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct at least 12 hours of in-service education, within 12 months of their hire date anniversary, for nurse aides as required for four of five nurse aides (Employees E12, E13, E14, and E15). Finding include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 11/28/23, indicated nursing assistants are required to complete 12 hours of in-service training per year, including areas of weakness as identified in performance evaluations. Review of the policy Inservice Training dated 9/1/23, indicated the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel on a regularly scheduled basis. All mandatory inservices must be completed annually as a condition of employment. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employees E12, E13, E14, and E15 education records with hire date greater than 12 months revealed the following: Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E12 had a hire date of 9/27/07, with 1.04 hours in-service education between 9/27/22, and 9/27/23. NA Employee E13 had a hire date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in one of two shower rooms(Second floor) and for two of four residents( Resident R83 and R84). Findings include: During an observation on 1/9/24, at 11:27 a.m., of the second floor bathroom located in the shower room, the toilet had hard stool and paper towels lying in toilet, the toilet was partially blocked with three shower chairs and other equipment. During an interview on 1/9/24, at 11:27 a.m., the Maintenance Director Employee E3 confirmed that the facility failed to provide a clean comfortable homelike environment for the residents of the second floor. During an observation on 1/10/24, at 8:23 a.m., of Residents R83 and R84 room, indicated soiled floor with debris under beds and black spots on the floor as well as food debris and personal belongings, the bathroom trash can was overflowing and the residents overbed tables were soiled with debris. During an interview on 1/10/24, at 8:25 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN) Employee E4 confirmed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe environment for residents in one of two resident lounges/activity areas (second-floor activity room). Findings include: During an observation on 1/10/24, at 5:52 p.m. two large bread knives, three steak knives, five paring knives, and one utility knife were observed in an unsecured drawer in the activity room. During an interview on 1/10/24, at 5:55 p.m. Activities Director Employee E1 confirmed that the second-floor activities room is available for resident use when staff members are not present, and confirmed that the presence of eleven knives in an unlocked, waist-height drawer posed a safety risk to the residents. During an interview on 1/12/23, at approximately 3:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide a safe environment for residents in one of two resident lounges/activity areas. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management. 28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(b) Staff development. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(a)(c)(d) Resident rights.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that all of the required members were in attendance at least quarterly at the Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) Committee meetings for two of four quarters, and failed to provide sign in sheet for QAPI Committee meetings for four of five meetings held (April 2023, May 2023, August 2023 and October 2023). Findings include: Review of the CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) §483.75(g) Quality assessment and assurance. §483.75(g) Quality assessment and assurance. §483.75(g)(1) A facility must maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting at a minimum of: (i) The director of nursing services; (ii) The Medical Director or his/her designee; (iii) At least three other members of the facility's staff, at least one of who must be the administrator, owner, a board member or other individual in a leadership role; and (iv) The infection Preventionist. (i) Meet at least quarterly and as needed to coordinate and evaluate activities under the QAPI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-22 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility personnel files and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified full time Food Service Director for four of four months. (9/23, 10/23, 11/23, and 12/23), Findings include: During an interview on 12/11/23, at 8:55 am Registered Dietitian Employee E1 confirmed that the facility failed to employ a full time Food Service Director. She stated that she was uncertain how long the prior Food Service Director resigned the position but she felt it was a couple months. During a review of Food Service Director (FSD) Employee E4's personnel file it was revealed that FSD Employee E4 resigned the position without notice on 9/22/23. During an interview on 12/11/23, at 9:00 am the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to employ a full time Food Service Director since the resignation of FSD Employee E4. PA Code: 211.6(c)(d) Dietary Services.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, three week Fall/ Winter cycle menu, menu postings and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to properly plan and post a cycle menu with alternative selections of equal nutrient value and to have a Registered Dietitian review and approve the three week cycle menu prior to implementation for three of three weeks of the cycle menu (Week one, Week two, and Week three of the Fall/ Winter cycle menu). Findings include: During an observation on 12/11/23 at 10:00 am of the facility's menu selection displayed in the first floor dining room it was determined that the facility failed to list an alternate menu selection of equal nutrient value. During a review of the facility's three week Fall/ Winter cycle menu it was revelaed that the menu failed to list an alternate menu selection of equal nutrient value for each meal of the cycle and failed to provide documented evidence that the facility's Registered Dietitian reviewed and approved the menus prior to implementation. During an interview on 12/11/23 at 12:05 pm Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility documents, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain equipment vital to the operation of the facility in proper work condition in the Main Kitchen and Laundry. (Main Kitchen, Laundry) Findings include: During an observation on 12/11/23, at 12:05 pm of the lunch meal food temperature audit it was determined that the point of service food temperatures failed to meet the facility's guidelines for palatable food. During this observation Registered Dietitian Employee E1 confirmed that the facility's induction heater for heating the thermal bases utilized to maintain point of service food temperatures was non operational. A review of facility documents revealed that on 10/15/23, Food Service Regional Manager Employee E8 emailed the corporate office regarding the heat induction system being non operational effective 10/14/23. During an interview of 12/11/23, at 1:00 pm the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility was aware of the Induction Heater being non operational. He further confirmed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, and grievance review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 17 of 25 residents (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, and R17). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Staffing/Center Plan dated 8/7/23, indicated centers will provide qualified and appropriate staffing levels to meet the needs of the patient population. The staffing plan will include all shifts, seven days per week. During an interview on 10/28/23, at 1:02 p.m. Resident R1, when asked if call lights took a long time to be answered, stated, I have to wait a lot. During an interview on 10/28/23, at 1:02 p.m. Resident R2, when asked if he felt the facility maintained sufficient staff, he stated loudly, No. Resident R2 stated that he has been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documents, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate assistance to prevent avoidable falls for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R5). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on 4//26/21. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 10/12/23, revealed diagnoses of osteoarthritis (degeneration of the joint causing pain and stiffness), diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and muscle weakness. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical record, resident interview and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to administer parenteral fluids consistent with professional standards of practice required to meet the nutritional needs of residents for one of two residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Parenteral Nutrition Support, last reviewed 5/1/23, informed patients/residents whose nutritional needs cannot be met via oral or tube feeding are nourished via Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN). TPN is indicated for a resident who has established malnutrition (or is at significant risk of developing malnutrition), and has a gastrointestinal tract that is either non-functional or cannot be accessed. Review of Resident R1's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anemia (blood produces lower then normal red blood cells), dehydration, acute kidney failure (kidneys suddenly become unable to filter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to meet the daily nutritional and special dietary needs for two of two residents (Resident R2 and Resident R3). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Supplementation last reviewed 5/1/23, informed the purpose is to provide medical food supplements to a resident whose meal intake is inconsistent or inadequate and only when ordered by a physician/advanced practice provider. Review of Resident R2's record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, anemia (low red blood cells reducing oxygen to the organs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (constricted airways cause difficulty or discomfort in breathing), atrial fibrillation (irregular fast heartbeat), right hip fracture, and congestive heart failure (the heart doesn't pump blood effectively). Review of Resident R2's current physician orders dated 8/30/23, included a House Shake (nutritional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-03-03 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to prominently display and maintain facility daily nurse staffing hours as required for eight of eight days 2/24/26 through 3/3/26)Findings include:During an observation on 3/3/26, at 8:30 a.m. the nursing hours posted in the front lobby was for 2/23/26. The previous nursing hours posted was 2/19/26.During an interview on 3/3/26, at 8:35 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility did not have the staffing hours updated and posted daily.28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee.
- No harm found · B2025-11-20 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or their representative received written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of transfer for three of six residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident R6, R27, and R116).Findings include: Review of federal regulation S483.15(d) Notice of Bed-Hold Policy, indicated, facilities must provide written information about these policies to residents prior to and upon transfer for such absences. This information must be provided to all facility residents, regardless of their payment source. These provisions require facilities to issue two notices related to bed-hold policies. The first notice could be given well in advance of any transfer, i.e., information provided in the admission packet. Reissuance of the first notice would be required if the bed-hold policy under the State plan or the facility's policy were to change. The second notice must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop person-centered care plans for two of eight residents (Resident R11 and R27).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 6/20/25, indicated, The interdisciplinary team (lDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan foreach resident. Review of facility census information revealed that Resident R11 and Resident R27 share a room. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R11 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and she was readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/26/25, included diagnoses of coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels) and end stage renal disease (ESRD, an inability of the kidneys to filter the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-12-20 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post contact information for the Medicaid Fraud Unit and Adult Protective Services as required, on two of two (first and second floor) nursing units. Findings include: Observations conducted on December 17, 2024, at 9:30 a.m., on the first and second floor nursing units, revealed the facility did not have the Medicaid Fraud Unit contact information posted or accessible to residents. Observations conducted on December 17, 2024, at 9:30 a.m., on the first and second floor nursing units, revealed the facility did not have the Adult Protective Services contact information posted or accessible to residents. During interview, on December 17, 2024, at 2:40 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the Adult Protective Services and Medicaid Fraud Unit contact information was not posted in areas available to residents and visitors. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a)Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(e) Management.
- No harm found · C2024-12-20 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident group interview and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post notice of the availability of survey results in a prominent location on two of two nursing units (first and second floors). Findings include: During an observation on 12/17/24, at 9:40 a.m. no signage was identified indicating survey results are available. During a resident group interview on 12/17/24, at 10:30 a.m. 10 out of 10 residents agreed that they were unaware of the location of the survey results (Residents R500, R501, R502, R503, R504, R505, R506, R507, R508, and R509). During an interview on 12/17/24, at 2:40 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator, confirmed the facility failed to post notice of the location of survey results in the facility. 28 Pa. Code 201.13(g) Issuance of license.
- No harm found · C2024-12-20 · tag F0579 — widespreadProvide information about how to apply for and use Medicare and Medicaid benefits.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to display written information on applying for Medicare and Medicaid benefits and receiving refunds for previous payments covered by Medicare and Medicaid on two of two nursing units (first and second floor). Findings include: Observations conducted on 12/17/24, at 9:30 a.m., on the first and second floor nursing units, revealed the facility failed to include information on how to apply for Medicare and Medicaid benefits and receiving refunds for previous payments covered by Medicare and Medicaid . During interview, on 12/17/24, at 2:40 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility failed to display written information on applying for Medicare and Medicaid benefits and receiving refunds for previous payments covered by Medicare and Medicaid on two of two nursing units (first and second floor). 28 Pa. Code: §201.29(i) Resident rights.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Effective Communication for four of ten staff members (Employee E9, E10, E11, E12). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, In-Service Training dated 11/1/24, indicated all staff are required to participate in regular in-service education. Review of the facility ' s previous policy Inservice Training dated 9/1/23, indicated the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel on a regularly scheduled basis. All mandatory in-services must be completed annually as a condition of employment. Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on Effective Communication. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E9 had a hire date of 7/5/11, failed to have Effective Communication in-service education between 7/5/23, and 7/5/24. NA Employee E10 had a hire date of 10/20/22, failed to have Effective Communication in-service education between 10/20/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Resident Rights for four of ten staff members (Employee E9, E13, E14, E15). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, In-Service Training dated 11/1/24, indicated all staff are required to participate in regular in-service education. Review of the facility ' s previous policy Inservice Training dated 9/1/23, indicated the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel on a regularly scheduled basis. All mandatory in-services must be completed annually as a condition of employment. Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on Resident Rights. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E9 had a hire date of 7/5/11, failed to have Resident Rights in-service education between 7/5/23, and 7/5/24. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E13 had a hire date of 11/29/22, failed to have Resident Rights in-service education between 11/29/23, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for six of ten staff members (Employee E9, E10, E11, E12, E13, and E14). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, In-Service Training dated 11/1/24, indicated all staff are required to participate in regular in-service education. Review of the facility ' s previous policy Inservice Training dated 9/1/23, indicated the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel on a regularly scheduled basis. All mandatory in-services must be completed annually as a condition of employment. Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on QAPI. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E9 had a hire date of 7/5/11, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 7/5/23, and 7/5/24. NA Employee E10 had a hire date of 10/20/22, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 10/20/23, and 10/20/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Compliance and Ethics for two of ten staff members (Employee E9 and E13). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, In-Service Training dated 11/1/24, indicated all staff are required to participate in regular in-service education. Review of the facility ' s previous policy Inservice Training dated 9/1/23, indicated the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel on a regularly scheduled basis. All mandatory in-services must be completed annually as a condition of employment. Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on Compliance and Ethics. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E9 had a hire date of 7/5/11, failed to have Compliance and Ethics in-service education between 7/5/23, and 7/5/24. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E13 had a hire date of 11/29/22, failed to have Compliance and Ethics in-service education…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Behavioral Health for two of ten staff members (Employee E9, E13, and E15). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, In-Service Training dated 11/1/24, indicated all staff are required to participate in regular in-service education. Review of the facility ' s previous policy Inservice Training dated 9/1/23, indicated the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel on a regularly scheduled basis. All mandatory in-services must be completed annually as a condition of employment. Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on Behavioral Health. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E9 had a hire date of 7/5/11, failed to have Behavioral Health in-service education between 7/5/23, and 7/5/24. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E13 had a hire date of 11/29/22, failed to have Behavioral Health in-service education between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-01-12 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, personnel records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for five out of five nurse aide (NA Employee E11, E12, E13, E14, and E15). Findings include: During an interview on 1/10/23, at 2:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility does not have performance reviews completed on NA Employee E11, E12, E13, E14, and E15. During an interview on 1/12/23, at 2:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for five of five nurse aides as required. 28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(b)(c)(d) Staff development. 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for seven of eight staff members (Employees E12, E13, E14, E15, E18, E19, and E20). Findings include: Review of the policy Inservice Training dated 9/1/23, indicated the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel on a regularly scheduled basis. All mandatory inservices must be completed annually as a condition of employment. Review of facility provided documents and trainng record for Employ Employees E11, E12, E13, E14, E15, E17, E18, E19, and E20 revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on effective communication. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E12 had a hire date of 9/27/07, failed to have effective communication in-service education between 9/27/22, and 9/27/23. NA Employee E13 had a hire date of 8/19/21, failed to have effective communication in-service education between 8/19/22, and 8/19/23. NA Employee E14 had a hire date of 1/3/19, failed to have effective communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on resident rights for nine of ten staff members (Employees E11, E12, E13, E14, E15, E17, E18, E19, and E20). Findings include: Review of the policy Inservice Training dated 9/1/23, indicated the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel on a regularly scheduled basis. All mandatory inservices must be completed annually as a condition of employment. Review of facility provided documents and trainng record for Employ Employees E11, E12, E13, E14, E15, E17, E18, E19, and E20 revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on resident rights. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E11 had a hire date of 12/17/16, failed to have residents rights in-service education between 12/17/22, and 12/17/23. NA Employee E12 had a hire date of 9/27/07, failed to have residents rights in-service education between 9/27/22, and 9/27/23. NA Employee E13 had a hire date of 8/19/21, failed to have residents rights in-service education between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement) for nine of ten staff members (Employees E12, E13, E14, E15, E16, E17, E18, E19, and E20). Findings include: Review of the policy Inservice Training dated 9/1/23, indicated the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel on a regularly scheduled basis. All mandatory inservices must be completed annually as a condition of employment. Review of facility provided documents and training record for Employees E12, E13, E14, E15, E16, E17, E18, E19, and E20 revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on QAPI . Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E12 had a hire date of 9/27/07, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 9/27/22, and 9/27/23. NA Employee E13 had a hire date of 8/19/21, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 8/19/22, and 8/19/23. NA Employee E14 had a hire date of 1/3/19, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 1/3/23, and 1/3/24. NA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on compliance and ethics for four of ten staff members (Employees E12, E13, E14, and E19). Findings include: Review of the policy Inservice Training dated 9/1/23, indicated the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel on a regularly scheduled basis. All mandatory inservices must be completed annually as a condition of employment. Review of facility provided documents and trainng record for Employees E12, E13, E14, and E19 revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on compliance and ethics . Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E12 had a hire date of 9/27/07, failed to have compliance and ethics in-service education between 9/27/22, and 9/27/23. NA Employee E13 had a hire date of 8/19/21, failed to have compliance and ethics in-service education between 8/19/22, and 8/19/23. NA Employee E14 had a hire date of 1/3/19, failed to have compliance and ethics in-service education between 1/3/23, and 1/3/24. Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for six of ten staff members (Employees E12, E13, E14, E15, E16, and E19). Findings include: Review of the policy Inservice Training dated 9/1/23, indicated the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel on a regularly scheduled basis. All mandatory inservices must be completed annually as a condition of employment. Review of facility provided documents and trainng record for Employees E12, E13, E14, E15, E16, and E19 revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on behavioral health . Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E12 had a hire date of 9/27/07, failed to have behavioral health in-service education between 9/27/22, and 9/27/23. NA Employee E13 had a hire date of 8/19/21, failed to have behavioral health in-service education between 8/19/22, and 8/19/23. NA Employee E14 had a hire date of 1/3/19, failed to have behavioral health in-service education between 1/3/23, and 1/3/24. NA Employee E15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$49,558 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $37,510 — penalty dated 2025-05-16
- $12,048 — penalty dated 2024-12-20
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2024 |
| PACS GROUP, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2024 |
| PACS HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2024 |
| 885 MACBETH DRIVE PA OWNER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| CARETRUST GP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/20/2025 |
| PA HOLDCO 1 MONROEVILLE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2014 |
| PA HOLDCO 2 MONROEVILLE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| CHAKRAPANI, RAJA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/20/2025 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| MURRAY, JASON | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 396003. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.