Life Care Center of North Glendale

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 148 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 91.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 223 beds and averages 119.2 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 104 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure the facility failed to ensure that food items were stored, dated, and labeled in accordance to professional standards. The deficient practice could lead to food borne illnesses.Findings Include:Observation of freezer on June 9, 2026 at 8:21 A.M. with Food Service Director (staff #45) revealed two personal size pepperoni pizzas and four burritos were not covered, open to air and not dated. Observation of #1 refrigerator on June 9, 2026 at 8:23 A.M. revealed a tray of individual clear cups with lids containing tartar sauce and coleslaw that were not dated. Also, a gallon container of relish that was half full did not have an open date.Observation of dry storage area on June 9, 2026 at 8:35 A.M. revealed a box of rainbow sprinkles open and no date of when opened. Bread crumbs were in a large container and it was dated January 2, 2026 and the use by date was June 2, 2026. Also, a large container of salt was dated January 2, 2026 and the use by date was June 2, 2026. In addition, Corn Flakes were in a container…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Screening (PASRR) was completed for one of two residents (#6), the universe was 125, with a diagnosis of a serious Mental Illness (MI) was referred to the appropriate state-designated authority and determination received. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the necessary specialized services that they require. Findings Include:Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure and renal failure.The physician order dated included following:-Rexulti (Brexpiprazole) 1 mg give one tablet by mouth one time a day for schizoaffective disorder ordered August 19, 2025.-Prozac (Fluoxetine HCI) 40mg give 2 capsules by mouth one time a day for depression ordered on September 6, 2022.-Trazodone 100mg give 1 tablet by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, staff and resident interviews, and facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that pain medication for one (Resident #132) of nineteen sampled residents was administered in accordance with physician orders. The facility census was 125. This deficient practice had the potential to result in overmedication, adverse drug effects, impaired pain management, and inaccurate assessment of the resident's pain status.Findings include:Resident #132 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cellulitis of the left and right lower extremities, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, psychoactive substance abuse, and alcohol abuse in remission.Resident #132's care plan dated May 16, 2026, revealed a focus stating that the resident experienced pain related to infection of the bilateral lower extremities. Interventions included administering pain medication as ordered and attempting non-pharmacological interventions prior to pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-06-12 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure toenail care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident #66). This deficient practice places residents with diabetes at risk for inadequate nail care which can result in infection, pain, discomfort, impaired mobility, and worsening nail conditions. The universe was 125 and the sample 2. Findings include:Resident #66 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, venous insufficiency, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and end-stage renal disease.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Health Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment revealed no indicators for mood or behaviors. The resident required set up or clean up assistance with personal hygiene, and was dependent on staff for putting on and taking off footwear.A care plan review date of April 21,2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, resident and staff interviews, observations, facility documentation, and policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided with professional standards of practice for one resident (#59). The deficient practice could result in care or services that do not meet residents' needs. The universe was 125 and the sample size was 1.Findings includeResident #59 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pneumonia, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and congestive heart failure.A care plan dated April 29, 2026, revealed a focus for oxygen therapy. Interventions include observing for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and reporting to the medical doctor as needed, monitor for respiratory distress including respiratory rate, pulse oximetry, increased heart rate, restlessness, diaphoresis, headaches, lethargy, confusion, atelectasis, and changes in skin color.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment date May 5, 2026 included a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, facility documentation, staff and resident interviews, and policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that medications were secured in a locked storage area and were accessible only to authorized personnel for Residents #27 and #66. The universe was 125, and the sample size was 2. Findings include: -Regarding Resident #66: Resident #66 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, venous insufficiency, and end-stage renal disease. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The assessment revealed no indicators for mood or behavior. Further review revealed the resident is at risk for developing pressure ulcers and skin injuries. The resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. During initial screening, an observation conducted on June 9, 2026, at 10:27 a.m. revealed a container of Coloplast Hydrophilic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation, staff and resident interviews, the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to provide for the needs of the residents. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the assistance required to complete care tasks. Findings include: Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, depression, and anxiety. The care plan dated November 29, 2024 revealed that the resident had bowel incontinence. Interventions included to assist with toileting as needed. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] included a brief interview for mental status score of 15 which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. -Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included morbid obesity, vascular dementia, and an overactive bladder. The care plan dated February 10, 2023 revealed that the resident had bowel incontinence. Interventions included assist with toileting as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from abuse from other residents. The deficient practice could result in residents being physically and emotionally injured. Findings include: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, chronic kidney disease, liver disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, and other specified disorders of bone density and structure unspecified site. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] included a brief interview for mental status score of 14 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A progress note dated August 13, 2024 revealed that this writer was at the nurse station at 6:40 p.m. when a certified nursing assistant (CNA) yelled out, no don't hit her, while rushing toward the incident. The CNA noticed the resident #37 with left hand balled onto a fist hitting the resident #11 by her left forearm. Nursing staff were immediately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and records review the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change of condition for one resident (#5). The deficient practice could result in delayed treatment. Findings include: Resident #5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle weakness, anemia, chronic kidney disease and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The care plan initiated on July 12, 2021 revealed that resident #5 was on anticoagulant therapy. The goal was that the resident will be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to anticoagulant use. Interventions included to administer anticoagulant medications as ordered by physician, monitor for side effects and effectiveness, observe for and report, as needed, adverse reactions of anticoagulant therapy including mental status and significant or sudden changes in vital signs. A progress note dated August 2, 2021 revealed the resident was sent to the hospital for a CT (Computerized Tomography) scan due to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-03 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY -Resident #92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis, bipolar disorder and depression. Review of the Level I PASRR dated 3/09/2023 included the diagnoses of bipolar disorder and depression. Per the documentation, the resident had not exhibited any interpersonal symptoms or behaviors (not due to a medical condition) and she received antidepressant medication daily. However, review of the physician's orders dated 03/09/2023 included: -Risperidone (antipsychotic) 2 milligrams (mg). Give 1 tablet via G-tube at bedtime for bipolar disorder with a target behavior of striking out. -Sertraline HCL (antidepressant) 50 mg. Give 1 tablet daily for depression with a target behavior of lack of motivation. A risk for change in mood or behavior care plan dated 03/10/2023 related to her medical condition had a goal to allow staff to assist her with basic needs. Interventions included a psychiatric consult as indicated. On 03/28/2023 a PASRR Level I screening was completed. The screening…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ