Life Care Center Of Yuma
2450 South 19th Avenue, Yuma, AZ 85364 · For profit - Corporation · 128 certified beds · (928) 344-0425 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.0% | 10.7% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.6% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.8% | 3.9% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 2.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.1% | 12.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.5% | 21.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.3% | 94.6% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.8% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.3% | 10.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 42.6% | 87.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.4% | 23.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.5% | 10.4% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 75.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.1%CMS range 50.4–67.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 6.7–12.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 75.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 78.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 75.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 50.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.2%CMS range 3.1–9.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 105.3 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the care plan regarding anticoagulant therapy was established for one resident (Resident #9). The deficient practice may result in absence of person-centered goals or safeguarding against adverse events related to medication therapy.Findings include:Resident # 9 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE], and had a medical history that included a history of falling, unspecified dementia, and unspecified anemia.Review of the MDS (minimum data set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 02, which indicated that Resident #9 was severely cognitively impaired. Section N titled, Medications - High-Risk Drug Classes, revealed Resident #9 was taking an anticoagulant (e.g., warfarin, heparin, or low-molecular weight heparin).A physician order dated December 28, 2023, revealed an order for Sodium Injection Solution Prefilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were recorded, stored, and reconciled accurately for one Resident (#1). The deficient practice could result in the inability to establishes a system of records of receipt and disposition of controlled drugs.Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility, with a last admission date of September 13, 2025, with diagnoses that included hypothyroidism, type 2 diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, chronic pain, acute on chronic systolic heart failure, and unspecified dementia.Review of the minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 08, which revealed Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment.A review of the care plan dated December 11, 2025 revealed that anxiety was addressed as a focus area. Interventions included administer anti-anxiety medications as ordered by physician.Review of the facility's 5-day investigation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure storage of controlled medication for one Resident (#1). The deficient practice could result in unsafe handling of controlled medication.Findings include:Review of the facility's 5-day investigation report submitted December 15, 2025, revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff #3 had a recollection of receiving the medication and placing it in the medication cart on September 16, 2025.An interview was conducted on December 16, 2025 at 10:04 pm with hospice registered nurse (RN) Staff #10 who revealed that the medications were delivered to the facility and the person accepting medication had signed a receipt for the controlled medication.A review of hospice documents was conducted on December 16, 2025 at 10:26 a.m. and revealed a receipt for Medication/Narcotic Delivery Receipt. Review of handwritten receipt revealed Staff #10 as person delivering medication: the name was printed, signature included, and there was a date, but no time. The persons…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication records were completed, or safeguarded against loss or destruction. The deficient practice could lead to incomplete medical records in accordance to professional standards. Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility, with a last admission date of September 13, 2025, with diagnoses that included hypothyroidism, type 2 diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, chronic pain, acute on chronic systolic heart failure, and unspecified dementia.Review of the minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 08, which revealed Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment.A review of the care plan dated December 11, 2025 revealed that anxiety was addressed as a focus area. Interventions included administer anti-anxiety medications as ordered by physician.Review of the facility's 5-day investigation report submitted December 15, 2025, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of sexual abuse was reported to the State Agency within the required time frame for one resident (# 684). This deficient practice can result in allegations of abuse not being reported. Findings include:Resident #684 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include unspecified dementia, depression, unspecified, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed that resident #684 was usually understood when communicating, but not without some difficulty.A review of the facility's Class Attendance Record, dated June 9, 2025, at 9:00 a.m., revealed that Incident and Reportable Event Management was presented to staff by the Director of Nursing (DON/Staff # 01).A review of the facility's Class…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to ensure that the facility policy was implemented regarding restricting access to residents following an allegation of abuse by a staff. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk and has the potential to violate the resident's right to safety and prevent further harm.Findings include:Resident #684 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, depression unspecified, and chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure (CHF). A review of the Constipation related to decreased mobility care plan, initiated on November 10, 2023, revealed an intervention directing staff to encourage the resident to sit on the toilet to evacuate bowels, if possible.A review of the care plan focus area for Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Self-Care Performance Deficit, related to activity intolerance, fatigue, and impaired balance secondary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure their policy was followed for abuse and injury of unknown origin for three residents (#66, #54 and #89). The deficient practice could lead to other policies not being followed potentially placing residents at harm. Findings include: Resident #54 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)score of 03, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. Resident #66 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of December 8, 2023 and a diagnosis of sepsis and chronic pain. Review of the BIMS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitive. The facility reported to the State Agency that a resident to resident altercation occurred between resident #66 and resident #54 on December 16, 2023. The allegation stated that resident #54 punched…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin and a resident to resident altercation for three residents (#66, #54 and #89). The deficient practice could lead to thorough investigations not being completed and sent to the State Agency potentially placing residents at harm. Findings include: Resident #54 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)score of 03, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. Resident #66 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of December 8, 2023 and a diagnosis of sepsis and chronic pain. Review of the BIMS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating the resident is cognitive. The facility reported to the State Agency that a resident to resident altercation occurred between resident #66 and resident #54 on December 16, 2023.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents care plans were updated and revised on four residents (#15, #66, #54 and #89). The deficient practice could result in the medical records not being complete and accurate, resulting in the resident not receiving the proper care or interventions. Findings include: Resident #15 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease, repeated falls, tremors, difficulty walking and a history of falling. Review of the Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating the resident is cognitive. It was reported to the State Agency that resident #15 sustained a fall that was witnessed by her roommate on December 17, 2023. It was reported to staff by the roommate, that resident #15 was standing by her bed and fell. Resident #15 told staff she had vertigo and fell. Review of the clinical record showed the care plan had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure accurate medical documentation was completed on four residents (#72, #54, #66 and #89). The deficient practice could result in the medical records not being complete and accurate. Findings include: Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], from an out of state medical facility, with a diagnosis of chronic pain and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This indicates that the resident is cognitive. An interview was conducted on March 13, 2025 at 12:10 PM with resident #72. She stated she had been admitted to the out of state medical facility with chronic pain. It was explained to her from the staff at the out of state medical facility, that the receiving facility would have the resident's controlled substances for her upon admission. Before discharge, the medical facility administered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#27) was not neglected and her basic needs were being met regarding assistance with bathing, nail clipping, hair washing, and monitoring the condition of her skin. The facility also failed to assess the resident's needs after falls and update the care plan with new interventions as needed. The deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident neglect. Findings include: Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, depression, and osteoporosis. The functional goal care-plan initiated April 27, 2022 with a revision date of September 4, 2024 revealed that the resident has limited physical mobility related to Alzheimer's disease, dementia, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and weakness. Interventions included that staff will assist with activities of daily living (ADL's) with a 1-2 assist as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review, and review of current facility practice, the facility failed to ensure care plan was developed and implemented to meet the assessed need for one resident (#78). The deficient practice could result in the resident receiving the care they need. Findings include: Resident #78 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. The mini nutritional assessment signed and dated 05/29/2024 revealed that the resident had a score of 6 indicating the resident was malnourished. The Residents at Risk meeting notes dated 05/29/2024 revealed that resident was a new admission and was on a mechanically altered diet on 05/29/2024. The weight record on 05/29/2024 was 221.5 lbs. (pounds). A nutritional assessment dated on 05/31/2024 revealed the resident had a diet of regular mechanically altered texture and thin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel file review, staff interviews, facility assessment and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA /staff #64) had the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification to provide nursing and related services. The deficient practice could result in staff not able to to safely meet resident needs during an emergency. Sample size was one. Facility census was 81. Findings include: The Facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed the staffing plan included 13 licensed nurses, and 27 CNA's to provide direct care for an average of 86 residents every day including emergencies. The assessment also revealed the resources the facilities needed to provide competent support and care for their resident population every day and during emergencies. A review of the personnel record for CNA (staff #64) revealed a hire date of [DATE] and had no evidence of current CPR certification. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at approximately 8:35 AM with the business office manager…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to maintain a clean kitchen; and failed to ensure food items were dated when opened. The deficient practice could result in residents having food-borne illness. Findings include: An observation of the kitchen was conducted on June 24, 2024 at 11:25 a.m. with the cook (staff #92). The large walk-in refrigerator had a 5lb opened and undated bag of green leaf lettuce that was exposed; and, the lettuce heads were wilted and discolored. Inside the bag of lettuce was a white plate with food covered by a plastic film. Staff #92 stated that the food items on the white plate were turkey, chicken and potato salad; and, she did not know how the plate got in the lettuce bag or why the bag of lettuce was left open. There was also an opened and exposed three-pound box of cream cheese; and the end of the cream cheese had dried out and was left open in the box. The refrigerator floor had spilled milk. The walk-in freezer area had approximately two cups of frozen corn kernels on the freezer floor and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to ensure infection control standards related to enhanced barrier precautions were followed for one resident (#78) with catheter and wound. The deficient practice could result in transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms. Findings include: Resident #78 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, emphysema, dementia, anxiety, and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptom. The care plan dated May 28, 2024 revealed that an indwelling catheter was in place for uropathy. Interventions included enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), catheter care per shift, change catheter as needed a 16FR (French) 10cc (cubic centimeter) and checking tube for kinks each shift. A physician order dated May 29, 2024 revealed an order for an indwelling catheter size 16 French with a 10cc bulb. The minimum data set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY -Resident #337 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included digestive surgery, sepsis due to enterococcus, and encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system. Review of hospital records, dated February 11, 2022 included discharge instructions for wound care which noted that there was use of a wound vacuum (VAC) for the resident's surgical wound. The admission nursing note dated February 12, 2022 included that the resident was admitted with a diagnosis of small bowel obstruction related to hernia surgery and the resident had an extensive debridement hernia repair. The note included the resident was admitted with a wound VAC in place. The resident's skin integrity care plan, initiated on February 12, 2022, included that the resident had a break in skin integrity. Interventions included treatments as ordered and a pressure reducing mattress. Nursing notes dated February 14 and 16, 2022 indicated that the wound VAC was in place and was functioning properly. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-22 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — patternPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation, interviews, and policy, the facility failed to ensure that staff were tested for COVID-19 at the required frequency. This deficient practice could lead to the spread of COVID-19. Findings include: Review of the COVID-19 log and line list for staff for November 25 through December 6, 2022 and the log and line list for residents for November 17, 2022 through November 30, 2022 revealed that the facility was in outbreak mode from November 17, 2022 through December 6, 2022. Review of the facility's COVID-19 documentation revealed no evidence that staff or residents had been tested for COVID-19 during the the facility outbreak of COVID-19. An interview was conducted on December 22, 2022 at 10:07 a.m. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON/staff #2), who identified herself as the Infection Preventionist (IP). She stated that she couldn't find her COVID-19 log and line list for residents and staff, so she was not able to provide COVID-19 documentation for residents prior to November 17, 2022 and for staff prior to November 25, 2022. She stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, interviews and policy, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of resident to resident abuse was thoroughly investigated for two residents (#24 and #51). The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused. Findings include: -Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, legal blindness, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating mild cognitive impairment. The assessment also included that the resident required one-person extensive assist with ambulating in a wheelchair. Review of the progress notes did not reveal any documentation regarding an allegation that resident #24 was hit by resident #51. -Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and policy, the facility failed to accurately complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process for one resident (#3). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving needed services. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included panic disorder (episodic paroxysmal anxiety), unspecified dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, major depressive disorder and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Review of the clinical record revealed that the resident had a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder added on January 20, 2021. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated December 12, 2021, included the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The assessment also included active diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression, schizophrenia, and PTSD. Review of the undated PASARR Level I assessment revealed that dementia was not the primary diagnosis and no mental illness was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and policy, the facility failed to develop a bowel care plan for one resident (#65). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving needed care. Findings include: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus (DM) type 2 with diabetic neuropathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, and dysphagia. Review of the physician's orders revealed the following bowel medication orders: -August 1, 2022 - Senna Tablet 8.6 milligrams (mg) (Sennosides) via Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) at bedtime for constipation -August 1, 2022 -Maalox plus suspension 30 milliliters via G-tube every 6 hours as needed for indigestion -August 1, 2022 - Loperamide capsule 2 mg via G-Tube every 12 hours as needed for diarrhea -August 26, 2022 -Imodium A-D Tablet 2 mg via G-tube every 6 hours as needed for diarrhea -September 7, 2022 - Questran light powder 4 grams (g) via G-tube every 7 days for diarrhea for 7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and policy, the facility failed to administer pain medications within ordered parameters for one resident (#65). The deficient practice could result in residents' receiving too much pain medication. Findings include: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus (DM) type 2 with diabetic neuropathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, dysphagia, and hypertension. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident's pain care plan include an intervention to administer pain medication as ordered. Review of the December 2022 recapitulation of physician's orders revealed the following orders: -Tramadol 50 milligrams (mg) via Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) every 12 hours as needed for pain levels 5 through 10 out of 10. -Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tablets via G-tube every 4 hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure treatments were provided as ordered for one sampled resident (#7) with a pressure ulcer. The deficient practice resulted in the resident not receiving consistent treatment for a pressure ulcer. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacral region, lymphedema, and history of vulvar cancer. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had one stage 4 pressure ulcer and was receiving pressure ulcer care. The assessment also revealed a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status which indicated the resident had intact cognition. A physician's order dated February 1, 2021 included for wound care: wash with normal saline, pat dry, peri skin prep, drape, loosely pack wound with white vac foam, topped with black vac foam, drape then place [NAME] pad. Negative Pressure Wound Treatment (NPWT) at low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed regarding catheter size for one sample resident (#7). The deficient practice could result in residents not having the size catheter ordered by the physician. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of a stage 4 pressure ulcer to the sacral region, lymphedema, and history of vulvar cancer. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status indicating the resident had intact cognition. The assessment included the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. A physician's order dated April 4, 2021 included for an indwelling catheter to straight drainage, size 16 French, bulb 10 cc (cubic centimeter) and to change monthly for infection, obstruction or when the closed system is compromised related to the pressure ulcer of the sacral region, stage 4. The quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 residents' (#32) medical record was complete. The deficient practice could result in residents' clinical records not being complete. Findings include: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified atrial fibrillation, asthma, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for June 2021 revealed no documentation for the following multiple medications: -buspirone (anxiolytic) 5 milligrams (mg) on June 4, 5, 6, and 11, 2021 -aspirin enteric coated on June 5, 2021 -diltiazem hydrochloride (antihypertensive) 120 mg on June 11, 2021 -metoprolol tartrate (antihypertensive) 25 mg on June 11, 2021 -pravastatin sodium (lipid lowering agent) 40 mg on June 2, 11, 15, 20, and 21, 2021 -tiotropium bromide monohydrate (bronchodilator) on June 5, 2021. Review of the MAR revealed no documentation to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-16 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (#32) was informed of the risks and benefits of a psychotropic medication prior to the administration of the medication. The deficient practice could result in residents/representatives not being information of the risks and benefits of taking psychoactive medications. Findings include: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified atrial fibrillation, asthma, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Physician's orders dated May 23, 2021 included for Alprazolam (anxiolytic) 0.25 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for sleep. An electronic MAR (eMAR) orders administration note dated May 24, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. revealed Alprazolam 0.25 mg was administered to the resident. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY -Resident #320 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included cellulitis of the left lower limb, type-2 diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease. An advance directive form dated [DATE] signed by the resident revealed the resident had chosen to be a Full Code. Review of the physician's order dated [DATE] revealed the following advance directive order: Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) with limited interventions. An interview was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON/staff #6) on [DATE] at 9:55 am. She stated the residents sign their code status on admission and the order will be entered in Point Click Care (PCC). The ADON stated the advance directive form has to be redone when the resident returns to the facility after hospitalization. She stated the code status in PCC should match the signed advance directive form in the resident's chart. Staff #6 further stated the resident chart should also include the orange DNR sheet if the resident chooses to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-16 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the required discharge information was documented and a discharge order was entered for one of three sampled residents (#69). The deficient practice could result in discharge requirements not being completed. Findings include: Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of falling, anxiety disorder, and dementia without behavioral disturbance. The discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an unplanned discharge to the community on June 17, 2021. Further review of the clinical record revealed no documentation that the physician was notified of the discharge, a physician's order was obtained for discharge, and/or a discharge summary. After a request was made for the information regarding the resident discharge, a copy of an AMA (Against…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-16 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan was developed for one sampled resident (#66) regarding the use of oxygen. The deficient practice may result in residents not being provided the services and person-centered care necessary to meet his/her needs. Findings include: Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), dependence on supplemental oxygen, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications and sepsis due to enterococcus. Review of the Weights and Vital Summary revealed the resident was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula on admission [DATE]), and on July 8 and 13, 2021. A physician's order dated July 13, 2021 revealed an order for oxygen at 2 liters/minute as needed (PRN) for desaturation. Review of the skilled nursing documentation dated July 2, 6, 7, 14 and 15, 2021 revealed resident #66 was on PRN oxygen for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was developed for hearing and the use of hearing aids for one resident (#20). The sample size was 16. The deficient practice could result in residents use of hearing aids not being reflected in the care plan. Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, heart failure, repeated falls and major depressive disorder. A physician order dated May 7, 2021 included the resident may have dental, podiatry, audiology, optometry care as needed. The nursing admission/readmission collection tool dated May 7, 2021 included that resident #20 had minimal difficulty hearing. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 8, indicating the resident had moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (#2) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and hygiene. The deficient practice could result in grooming and hygiene needs of residents not being met. Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included quadriplegia, unspecified, encounter for attention to gastrostomy, and encounter for attention to tracheostomy. Review of the care plan revised on April 23, 2021 revealed the resident had an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care deficit related to cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and quadriplegia. Interventions included extensive assistance with bathing, and total assistance with personal hygiene and oral care. Review of the Point of Care (POC) Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) bathing documentation dated June 19, 2021 through July 7, 2021 revealed the resident received bathing/showers on 5 occasions. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#43) was served food that accommodated the resident's food allergies. The census was 62. The deficient practice could result in residents receiving food that they are allergic to. Findings include: Resident #43 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, type II diabetes, and schizophrenic disorder. Review of the Order Summary Report for July 2021 stated at the top of the form that the resident's allergies included peppers. Review of the resident's face sheet revealed the resident had an allergy to peppers. Review of the resident's food/meal card listed bell peppers as an allergy. An observation of the resident's tray conducted on 7/14/21 at 1:45 PM. Small pieces of bell pepper were observed off to the side of the tray. Review of the meal card revealed allergies that included bell peppers. The resident stated that she had been given a food tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control standards were followed regarding tracheotomy care for one resident (#2) and catheter care for one resident (#7). The deficient practice could result in the spread of infection. Findings include: -Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of stage 4 pressure ulcer to the sacral region, lymphedema, and history of vulvar cancer. Review of the clinical record revealed a physician order dated April 4, 2021 for urinary catheter care every shift. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included the resident had an indwelling catheter. An observation was conducted on July 15, 2021 at 9:43 AM of perineal and catheter care with a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA/staff #7). The CNA announced herself, stated what care she would be providing to the resident, and obtained the resident's consent. Staff #7 was observed to wash her hands and don gloves. The CNA proceeded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRESTON, FORREST | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/06/1976 |
| BUTNER, NANCY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/16/2018 |
| CABRERA, AIMEE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/20/2026 |
| GARITY, JOANNA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/14/2024 |
| FLETCHER, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/01/2021 |
| LAY, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/09/2018 |
| SWANKER, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2022 |
| ZIEGLER, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/16/1999 |
| CROSS, CINDY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/21/1994 |
| HENRY, TERRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 08/16/1999 |
| THURMOND, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/22/2000 |
| LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/31/2006 |
| BOUTROS, FADY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/06/2025 |
| PRESTON, AUBREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/27/2024 |
| YUMA REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/31/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in AZ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arizona Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 035133. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.