No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP

Ownership rollup across 44 nursing homes in 6 states: Montana, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Washington, Wyoming. The "follow the money" view of an operator’s whole portfolio — the pattern a single facility page can’t show.

Insights

The chain’s homes average 2.5 of 5 stars on the CMS overall rating — about 0.6 stars below the ~3.0 average of the 6 states it operates in. A whole portfolio rating below its own states’ norm is a pattern worth researching, not a single-home fluke. It is also moving the wrong way: across the same 44 homes rated throughout, the average fell 0.20 stars between 2025-02 and 2026-06. We benchmark against its own states because CMS ranks the health-inspection star within each state, so a national comparison (national average ~3.0) partly measures where a chain operates rather than how it operates.

44
Homes in this chain
4,222
Certified beds96 per home on average
70%
Occupied2,976 residents a day across 4,222 beds
-0.20
Star changeacross the 44 homes rated throughout · 2025-02 to 2026-06
6
States covered
2.5
Average CMS ratingacross 43 of 44 homes CMS rates · ~3.0 in its states · ~3.0 nationally

Where the rating comes from

The CMS overall star blends three different things. Split apart across the whole portfolio, they say different things about an operator: thin staffing is a budget decision made above the building, while a weak inspection score is what surveyors actually found inside it.

ComponentChain averageBasis
Health inspection2.4 of 543 rated homesstate surveyors’ findings, ranked within each state
Staffing3.3 of 543 rated homesfrom payroll (PBJ) hours
Quality measures3.0 of 543 rated homeslargely self-reported clinical data

Averaged across this chain’s rated homes. Health-inspection stars are assigned within each state’s own distribution, so for a chain spanning several states this component mixes distributions and is best read alongside each home’s actual citations.

Portfolio red flags

How many of this chain’s homes carry the most serious CMS markers. One flagged home can be local; a pattern across the portfolio is an operator-level signal worth researching.

9 with immediate-jeopardy citations1 on the CMS Special Focus list2 Special-Focus candidates10 with an abuse flag37 with federal fines
Ownership

2 of this chain’s 44 homes are tied to a real-estate investment trust (REIT) in CMS ownership records. Private-equity and REIT operators are the focus of most research into how money is moved out of nursing homes — often through the related-party payments shown below. CMS under-reports these ties, so read this as a floor.

Follow the money — chain finances

Aggregated from each home’s CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS). Related-party payments are dollars a home sends to landlords or management companies under common ownership — the main channel through which private-equity and REIT owners can pull money out of a home while its own books still show a thin margin.

$11.0M
Related-party expensesummed across 42 homes · FY2023 cost reports
4%
of operating expensegoes to related companies, across the 42 homes reporting both figures
-4.7%
Operating marginrevenue-weighted across 44 homes with a cost report
$2.2M
Total federal fines37 homes fined

Only homes with a cost report on file are included, so the related-party total is a floor. Cost reports are self-filed, unaudited, and a year or two behind.

Who pays — share of resident-days across this chain
Medicaid 63%Medicare 11%Other / private 25%

Weighted by each home’s average daily census, across the all 44 homes that report both a usable payer mix and a census. Homes whose cost report fails the same validity check the facility pages apply are left out of this figure entirely rather than counted as zero.

Every home in this chain

Lowest-rated first, so the homes most worth a closer look sit at the top. Each links to its full inspection, staffing, fines, and ownership record.

HomeCMS ratingFlags
Laurel Health & Rehabilitation CenterLaurel, MT 1 of 5$7,163 fined
Livingston Health & Rehabilitation CenterLivingston, MT 1 of 5$17,404 fined
El Jen Skilled CareLas Vegas, NV 1 of 5Abuse flag $52,466 fined
Gardnerville Health & Rehabilitation CenterGardnerville, NV 1 of 5Abuse flag
Portland Health And RehabilitationPortland, OR 1 of 5$24,827 fined
Firesteel Healthcare CenterMitchell, SD 1 of 5$153,308 fined
Palisade Healthcare CenterGarretson, SD 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy Abuse flag $154,946 fined
Riverview Healthcare CenterFlandreau, SD 1 of 54 immediate-jeopardy SFF candidate Abuse flag $176,867 fined
Alaska Gardens Health and RehabilitationTacoma, WA 1 of 52 immediate-jeopardy $170,372 fined
Shepherd of the Valley Rehabilitation and WellnessCasper, WY 1 of 5$97,031 fined
Worland Health and RehabilitationWorland, WY 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy SFF candidate Abuse flag $41,746 fined REIT-owned
Aspen Meadows Health And Rehabilitation CenterBillings, MT 2 of 5$115,183 fined
Mountain View Health And RehabilitationCarson City, NV 2 of 5Abuse flag $25,675 fined
Independence Health And RehabilitationIndependence, OR 2 of 5$69,876 fined
Village Health CareGresham, OR 2 of 5$22,695 fined
Canterbury HouseAuburn, WA 2 of 5$68,159 fined
Enumclaw Health and RehabilitationEnumclaw, WA 2 of 5$23,203 fined
North Cascades Health and RehabilitationBellingham, WA 2 of 52 immediate-jeopardy Abuse flag $295,969 fined
Seattle Medical Post Acute CareSeattle, WA 2 of 5Abuse flag $73,318 fined
Shelton Health and RehabilitationShelton, WA 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $65,213 fined
Granite Rehabilitation and WellnessCheyenne, WY 2 of 5$15,548 fined
Laramie Health and RehabilitationLaramie, WY 2 of 5Abuse flag $35,880 fined REIT-owned
Wind River Rehabilitation and WellnessRiverton, WY 2 of 5$25,984 fined
Pahrump Health And RehabilitationPahrump, NV 3 of 5$40,427 fined
La Grande Post Acute RehabLa Grande, OR 3 of 5
Windsor Health And RehabilitationSalem, OR 3 of 5$20,910 fined
Fountain Springs HealthcareRapid City, SD 3 of 5$22,526 fined
Prairie View Healthcare CenterWoonsocket, SD 3 of 5$8,512 fined
Wheatcrest Hills Healthcare CenterBritton, SD 3 of 5$37,553 fined
Royal Park Health and RehabilitationSpokane, WA 3 of 5$111,830 fined
Rawlins Rehabilitation and WellnessRawlins, WY 3 of 52 immediate-jeopardy $14,433 fined
Sage View Care CenterRock Springs, WY 3 of 5$8,278 fined
Thermopolis Rehabilitation and WellnessThermopolis, WY 3 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $27,072 fined
Hot Springs Health & Rehabilitation CenterHot Springs, MT 4 of 5$22,614 fined
Missoula Health & Rehabilitation CenterMissoula, MT 4 of 5
Polson Health & Rehabilitation CenterPolson, MT 4 of 5$17,404 fined
Hillsboro Health And RehabilitationHillsboro, OR 4 of 5
The Dalles Health And RehabilitationThe Dalles, OR 4 of 5$14,380 fined
Americana Health and RehabilitationLongview, WA 4 of 5
Buena Vista HealthcareColville, WA 4 of 5$13,104 fined
Frontier Rehabilitation and Extended CareLongview, WA 4 of 5
Transitional Care Of SeattleSeattle, WA 4 of 5
Milton Freewater Health And RehabilitationMilton Freewater, OR 5 of 5$8,278 fined
Ormsby Post Acute RehabilitationCarson City, NVNot rated1 immediate-jeopardy Special Focus Abuse flag $60,464 fined
Read this as a floor, not a verdict. CMS chain and ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties, and a low chain average can hide strong individual homes (or vice-versa). Use it to know which questions to ask — then read each home’s actual inspection record and confirm current ownership with your state licensing agency.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (nursing-home ratings, deficiencies, penalties, and ownership) and the CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS) for finances. Chain membership is as reported to CMS. CMS extracts retrieved 30 August 2026; CMS refreshes them monthly, so counts here are as of that date. Verify with the facility and your state regulator.