No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Laurel Health & Rehabilitation Center

820 3rd Ave, Laurel, MT 59044 · For profit - Corporation · 79 certified beds · (406) 628-8251 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (406) 628-8251 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$7,163 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $7,163 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-12)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1035 1st Ave · 16286311 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
205 S 1st Ave · (406) 812-3185 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
406Spices0.5 mi
401 E Main St · (406) 640-3810 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Thompson Park, 100 E 8th St · (406) 628-7431 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.1%18.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%2.1%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.1%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.7%5.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.5%0.6%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%4.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.8%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.7%15.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.2%93.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%6.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.3%24.1%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.7%20.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine44.1%73.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.2%19.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.2%14.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.031.381.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.212.161.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.9%CMS range 38.0–56.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.9–13.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 2.6–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
67.6%
Total nursing turnover
69.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 61.5 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

23
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-29)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-10-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#3) of 14 sampled residents was free from a significant medication error requiring hospitalization. Resident #3 was given 22.5 mls of Methadone instead of the ordered 10 mls. Findings include: Review of a facility reported incident, dated 3/8/23, showed a medication error resulted in resident #3 being transferred to the emergency room from the wound clinic. Investigation for the incident showed the resident was to receive 10 mls of Methadone, but received 22.5 mls. Review of the incident showed the dosage of Methadone had been changed from 22.5 mls to 10 mls on 3/6/23 upon return from a hospital stay. Review of resident #3's Nursing Progress Notes, dated 3/6/23 to 3/7/23, showed the resident asked for his morning dose of Methadone. Staff member G documented the resident received the medication per the instructions, 22.5 mls daily. Staff member G documented when she went to record the medication administration she realized the order had changed to 10 mls with lunch. Resident #3 left for an appointment at the wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize and maintain a QAPI system to identify performance improvement issues related to grievances, abuse and neglect allegations, Bowel and Bladder care for dependent residents, and infection control; and failed to show how the QAPI committee was involved in addressing these quality of care issues and the lack of policies and procedures which could negatively affect many, or all, of the residents residing at the facility. Findings include:During an interview and record review on 1/28/26 at 2:45 p.m., staff member A stated the facility met monthly to discuss any concerns the department managers had. Staff member A stated the department managers did not bring data to the meetings. Staff member A stated the meeting was, more of a conversation type meeting where the managers can bring their issues in their department forward and we talk about ideas to resolve them. Staff member A stated the departments do not present on trends based on data. Staff member A stated the QAPI group did look at customer satisfaction surveys and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an annual improvement project that focuses on high risk or problem-prone areas identified through the data collection and analysis. Findings include: During an interview and record review on 1/28/26 at 2:45 p.m., staff member A did not have minutes, or documentation to present for the last QAPI meeting, only an agenda/attendance sign in sheet. Staff member A stated the QAPI group had not discussed concerns around abuse and neglect, grievances, infection control, dental needs, bathing, activities for disabled residents, care planning, or antibiotic stewardship. Staff member A stated the facility did not have any performance improvement plans for the past twelve months.Review of the facility's, QAPI Plan,, dated October 2018, reflected:- . The Quality Assurance (QAA) Committee oversees the Center QAPI program. They are tasked with identifying areas requiring performance improvement, collecting data, developing and implementing corrective action, and creating monitors to determine and validate changes are effective and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed when providing incontinence care for 1 (#21); hand hygiene practices were followed for 1 (#7); posted PPE requirements were followed for 1 (#21); transporting of dirty linens; storage of clean linens; and maintained cleanable surfaces for 34 sampled residents. These deficient practices place all residents at increased risk of infection. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 1/26/26 at 4:41 p.m., resident #21 stated she often was left wet with a pad added to her brief at night so the staff would not have to change her brief so often. Resident #21 stated she was currently on antibiotics for a urinary tract infection. Resident #21 stated one CNA always wiped from back to front and right after she worked, she developed the E. Coli urinary tract infection.During an observation and interview on 1/27/26 at 1:30 p.m., staff member K was assisting resident #21 off the toilet and cleaning her peri-area and anus. Staff member K entered and began cares without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an antibiotic stewardship program in order to promote the appropriate use of antibiotics. This deficient practice increased the risk for residents to develop drug-resistant organisms and/or complications. Findings include:During an interview and record review on 1/28/26 at 2:40 p.m., staff member P stated the facility Infection Preventionist was not available during the week of the survey. Staff member P reported the facility did not have an antibiotic stewardship program in place. Staff member P stated the Infection Preventionist tracked infections but did not address specific laboratory results and sensitivity of infectious agent to the antibiotic ordered by the physician. Staff member P was not able to locate an antibiogram or audits for the infections. Resident #21 reported she was being treated for a facility acquired E. Coli urinary tract infection. Refer to F880. Review of the facility's Line Listing for Infections by Resident, dated 10/1/25, reflected 40 percent of the infections for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence to show the facility took action to acknowledge and resolve, or attempt to resolve, all concerns brought forth by the resident council. The failure affected any resident who had concerns that remained unresolved, or who had an interest in the council's activities. Findings include:During an observation of the facility's Resident Council meeting on 1/28/26 at 11:01 a.m., staff member C was observed asking the residents, How are things going? Staff member C did not read aloud the previous meeting minutes and did not follow up on the previous month's concerns. Unidentified residents in attendance reported ongoing and unresolved concerns with missing laundry, meals being served cold, and call lights not being answered in a timely manner.During an interview on 1/28/26 at 11:59 a.m., staff member C stated she had recently been assigned as the resident council's staff liaison. Staff member C stated she transcribed the Resident Council's meeting minutes and would follow up with departments in which residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances either voiced or provided to the facility were followed up on and resolved, and this was a system failure, to include: not assisting with verbal grievances, not identifying concerns and resolving them, not notifying the party filing the grievance of the resolution, not documenting steps taken to resolve the grievance, and not maintaining the grievance for 3 years from the date the grievance decision was issued for 1 (#21) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice affected all residents with grievances related to concerns or quality-of-care issues, which could negatively affect many or all of the residents residing at the facility. Findings include:During an interview on 1/26/26 at 4:41 p.m., resident #21 stated she had filed several complaints over the past couple of months. Resident #21 stated she filed grievances regarding the staff behavior, positioning during incontinence care, and dietary concerns. Resident #21 also stated she reported grievances for bringing resident #7 to the dining room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and/or neglect for 5 (#s 7, 11, 18, 21, and 62) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in psychosocial distress for resident #7 feeling intimidated and scared to return to her room; on-going psychosocial distress with resident #11 feeling scared due to the physical and verbal abuse (with fear of a repeat event occurring with a fellow resident); resident #21 having her head hit the wall during peri care (with fear of a repeat event occurring); and neglecting to provide resident #s 7, 18 and 21 proper toileting care, which may have contributed to a urinary tract infection for resident #21. Findings include:1. During an observation and interview on 1/27/26 at 9:46 a.m., resident #11 stated on the night of 12/28/25, resident #62 came into her room, held her arms down, tried to get into her bed with her, and yelled, You know who I am, repeatedly at resident #11. Resident #11 stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of neglect and abuse to the State Survey Agency for 3 (#s 7, 18, and 21) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #7 having fear of going to her room, resident #21 had fear of having her head hit the wall during care sessions, and for resident #21 voiced fear of having her head hit the wall during care (recurrent), and neglect of care related to care and services not being provided as needed for #s 7, 18, and 21. Refer to F600 for more information on failure to prevent abuse/neglect. Findings include:1. During an observation and interview on 1/26/26 at 4:20 p.m., resident #7 was crying while telling staff member J, who was pushing her in her wheelchair to her room, Please don't make me go in my room, I'm scared to go in there, please don't take me in there. Resident #7 stated, I dread going in there, my roommate wants everything her way . It's depressing to me . Staff leave me in there.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper ADL (Activities of Daily Living) cares were completed, specifically for 1 (#28) who was not receiving toenail care while her roommate #5 received toenail care biweekly; and for 3 (#s 11, 59, and 77) were not receiving showers from the facility. This deficient practice resulted in a resident feeling unclean and unkept. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 1/26/26 at 4:07 p.m., resident #28 stated she only had her toenails clipped once in the time that she had been in the facility. Resident #28's feet were notably odorous from a distance once her socks and shoes were removed. She stated she had been at the facility for about three months. Resident #28's roommate (resident #5) stated she had her toenails clipped twice a week during her showers. During an interview on 1/28/26 at 1:47 p.m., staff member S stated resident #28 should have her toenails clipped biweekly or at least weekly by a nurse as resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of a resident's property from loss or theft for 1 (#6) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice placed resident #6 at risk for continued loss of personal property and lack of resolution for reported concerns. Findings include: During an interview on 1/29/26 at 9:03 a.m., resident #6 stated that approximately six months earlier two shirts were taken from her clothes closet and five additional shirts were never returned from the facility's laundry service. Resident #6 stated she reported the missing items to facility staff. Resident #6 stated housekeeping searched for the items for a short period but did not locate any of the missing clothing. Resident #6 stated no facility staff have followed up with her since the report of missing items. During an interview on 1/29/26 at 11:00 a.m., staff member A stated if a resident's personal belongings were lost or stolen at the facility, she would expect the facility to replace the items. Staff member A stated resident #6's lost or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate an abuse allegation for 2 (#s 11 and 62) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in psychosocial distress for resident #11 who was feeling scared due to the physical and verbal abuse (with fear of a repeat event occurring with a fellow resident). Findings include: During an observation and interview on 1/27/26 at 9:46 a.m., resident #11 stated on the night of 12/28/25, resident #62 came into her room, held her arms down, tried to get into her bed with her, and yelled, You know who I am, repeatedly at resident #11. Resident #11 stated, (She) screamed for help for quite some time, and no one came. Resident #11 showed her arms were held above her head, crossed, and held down. She stated she tried to hit resident #62 but that did not work. She stated she tried to hit him with her water cup next. She stated she would have hit him with her cane if she could have but it was across the room. She stated resident #62 had been in her room two other times. Both times, resident #62 had urinated in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit each resident to remain in the facility and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility without written notice and a safe discharge plan for 1 (#72) of 3 discharged residents subsampled. Findings include:Review of resident #72's Clinical Census EHR, no date, reflected resident #72 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 12/5/25.Review of resident #72's EHR Progress Notes, dated 11/29/25 - 12/10/25, reflected:-Resident #72 left the facility at 12:30 p.m. on 12/5/25. Resident #72 did not return by midnight. Resident #72 had left the facility with a friend.-Resident #72 called the facility at 1:40 a.m. and left a voicemail stating her car broke down on the way back from visiting her mother and would call again in the morning.-Resident #72's sister called the facility on 12/6/25 and stated resident #72 had car trouble and would not make it back to the facility today but would hopefully make it back by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and or the resident's representative, in writing, of the reason for transfer when transferring a resident to the hospital, for 1 (#35) of 34 sampled residents. Findings include:During an interview on 1/26/26 at 4:15 p.m., NF2 stated resident #35 was transferred to the hospital for stroke-like symptoms on 8/26/25. NF2 stated she did not receive a written notice of transfer from the facility.During an interview on 1/29/26 at 2:56 p.m., staff member A stated the social services department would have been responsible for sending the written notice of transfer for resident #35's hospitalization on 8/26/25. Staff member A stated it appeared the letter was not sent because it was not documented in resident #35's electronic medical record.Review of resident #35's electronic medical record failed to include a transfer notice for resident #35's facility-initiated transfer on 8/26/25.On 1/28/26 a request was made for a copy of resident #35's transfer notification, for the 8/26/25 facility-initiated transfer. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's PTSD triggers were noted on the resident's Care Plan for 1 (#61) of 34 sampled residents. Findings include:During an interview on 1/26/26 at 3:35 p.m., resident #61 stated he did have PTSD from the Vietnam and Kuwait War. He stated he did have memories and flashbacks from both wars, and he felt he was triggered from loud noises at times or when a person walked behind him (including when he was seated at a restaurant with people moving behind him). He stated no staff members from the facility had asked him about his triggers, but he felt they were important for staff members to know.Review of resident #61's Care Plan, initiated 7/2/25, showed: behavioral monitoring due to resident #61's PTSD diagnosis, and a revision on 1/27/26 which showed PTSD from Vietnam War - If resident does not want to talk about the stress they're feeling, don't pressure resident, honor their request and notify nurse or social services to follow up for any ongoing support/needs resident may have. Resident #61's Care Plan did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with hearing and vision limitations were provided group and individual activities to meet their needs and preferences for 1 (#1) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #1 self-isolating. Findings include:During an interview on 1/26/26 at 3:55 p.m., resident #1 was sitting in her room, in her wheelchair, approximately 1.5 ft away from her television. The volume on the television was turned up very high. The curtains were pulled closed, and the room was dark. Resident #1 stated she tried to participate in activities for a while, but she could not hear or see the activities to actively participate, so she stopped going to the activities. Resident #1 stated there were no activities for someone who is blind and deaf. Resident #1 stated she did not receive regular visits from anyone in activities, so she enjoyed her television to keep busy. Resident #1 had a pocket talker (handheld auditory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer and ensure hearing aids were properly working for 1 (#63) of 34 sampled residents. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 1/26/26 at 12:57 p.m., resident #63 was very hard of hearing and stated he wanted his hearing aids fixed. Resident #63 stated whenever he requested anything, the facility took a long time to get anything fixed. During a follow up interview (on 1/27/26 at 8:13 a.m.), resident #63 stated his hearing aids were broken, and the facility would not help him in getting to the VA to have them fixed. Resident #63 stated he was unable to converse with anyone, including any healthcare workers that worked with him or his physician. Resident #63 stated there was no social worker at the facility who was able to help with the process of getting to the VA.Review of resident #63's EHR showed resident #63 had an admission date to the facility of 8/29/25.During an interview on 1/28/26 8:59 a.m., with staff members A and B, staff member A stated they recently had their social services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinent residents received treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections, avoid skin breakdown, and maintain continence to the degree possible for 3 (#s 7, 18, and 21) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice may have contributed to resident #21 developing a urinary tract infection and resident #7 developing a red, inflamed rash in two areas above and below her pannus. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 1/26/26 at 4:41 p.m., resident #21 stated she often was left wet with a pad added to her brief at night so the staff would not have to change her brief so often. Resident #21 stated she was currently on antibiotics for a Escherichia Coli urinary tract infection because CNAs were not changing her during the night and cleaning her properly. Resident #21 stated the night CNA would answer her call light and say she would come back but never did, and she wet herself and her bed, on 1/25/26. Resident #21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer fluids and nutrition to a dependent resident for 1 (#59) of 34 sampled residents. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 1/26/26 at 4:49 p.m., NF7 stated resident #59 was not getting enough fluids or food throughout the day and was worried about resident #59. NF7 stated resident #59 did not void yesterday and when NF7 asked the staff about the frequency of her previous voids, the staff were unable to answer or would disappear and/or forget to come back with an answer. NF7 stated the staff members . don't come enough, resulting in resident #59 not eating or drinking enough. NF7 looked into resident #59's mouth and found a small amount of food sitting in between both bicuspids. NF7 was upset, removed the food and stated resident #59 did not even have the right type of diet for her current ability. NF7 stated the food should be cut up really small because resident #59 was having a hard time chewing lately. NF7 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure tube feed bags were changed every 24 hours for 1 (#11) of 2 sampled residents receiving tube feedings. Findings include: During an observation on 1/27/26 at 9:46 a.m., resident #11's continuous tube feed bag was dated 1/26/26 and did not have any staff initials on it.During an observation and interview on 1/28/26 at 8:12 a.m. and at 10:17 a.m., resident #11's continuous tube feed bag was dated 1/26/26. There was spilled tube feed formula on the outside of the tube feed bag, as well as a significant amount of tube feed formula spilled on the floor. Resident #11 stated she did not know if new tubing was used every day, but stated she had seen staff refill the same bag before.During an interview on 1/28/26 at 8:15 a.m., staff member L stated they changed the tube feed bag every 24 hours. Staff member L stated, That's what I have always done.During an interview on 1/29/2026 at 7:40 a.m., staff member U stated tube feed bags and tubing needed to be changed every 24 hours because of what staff member U had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with post-traumatic stress disorder received trauma-informed care, accounting for resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 (#61) of 34 sampled residents. Findings include:Review of resident #61's EHR showed a medical diagnosis of PTSD.During an interview on 1/26/26 at 3:35 p.m., resident #61 stated he did have PTSD from the Vietnam and Kuwait War. He stated he did have memories and flashbacks from both wars and he felt he was triggered by loud noises at times or when a person walked behind him (including when he was seated at a restaurant with people moving behind him). He stated no staff members from the facility had asked him about his triggers, but he felt knowing the triggers were important for staff members to know.Review of resident #61's Care Plan, initiated 7/2/25, showed: behavioral monitoring due to resident #61's PTSD diagnosis, and a revision made on 1/27/26 which showed PTSD from Vietnam War - If…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was less than 5% during 2 (#s 25 and 74) of 26 observed medication administrations. There was an observed medication error rate of 7.41%. Findings include:1. During an observation and interview on 1/27/26 at 7:52 a.m., staff member S prepared morning medications for resident #74. Staff member S looked at the medication bottle, Nephro Vitamins. The contents listed on the back of the medication bottle were:-Vitamin C, 60 mg-Vitamin B-1, 1.5 mg-Vitamin B-2, 1.7 mg-Niacin, 20 mg-Vitamin B-6, 10 mg-Folate, (800 mcg folic acid)-Vitamin B-12, 6 mcg-Biotin, 300 mcg-Pantothenic acid, 10 mgStaff member S looked at the MAR, hesitated, and stated the medication on the back of the bottle and the MAR were different. The MAR showed: Nephro-Vite Oral Tablet 0.8 MG (B-Complex w/C & Folic Acid). Staff member S stated, That's a good question, when answering how much of the medication they were supposed to give based on the order in the MAR and all the doses listed on the back of the Nephro Vitamin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental services were offered in a timely manner for 2 (#'s 4 and 57) of 34 sampled residents. The failure placed residents at elevated risk for oral pain, infection, impaired nutrition, and decline in oral health. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 1/28/26 at 2:31 p.m., resident #4 stated he would like to go see a dentist if that option was available to him. He stated no one ever asked him since he had been at the facility. Resident #4 had broken, missing teeth, and blackened areas on his front teeth. Resident #4 stated he would avoid hard foods because they hurt when he tried to chew them. The surveyor requested information related to resident #4's dental appointments, referrals, notes, and information provided showed: Review of a facility document, not titled or dated, showed in pen: [Resident #4] . 1/29/26: Doesn't want dental appointment at this time. Review of resident #4's Care Conference, dated 1/4/26, showed: . Referrals or Recommendations for Mental Health, Podiatry,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident preference for Jello to 1 (#11) of 34 sampled residents. Findings include:During an interview on 1/27/26 at 9:46 a.m., resident #11 stated the facility would often run out of Jello in the facility. She also stated she was able to have applesauce, pudding, and Jello in the hospital, but staff at the facility told her she was only able to have Jello at the facility. She stated, Jello was the most important thing. That's the only thing I can eat (besides resident #11's continuous tube feed). Resident #11 stated she had a tumor in her throat that would not allow her to swallow other foods. Resident #11 stated strawberry Jello was her favorite and the facility never had that flavor available to her. She stated if they had Jello, the flavor was always orange.During an interview on 1/28/26 at 2:38 p.m., staff member G stated the facility had at least four or five flavors of Jello (cherry, lime, orange, and strawberry). Staff member G stated the facility had to make it from scratch as it was less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify or correct deficient practice(s) through the utilization of their QAPI process related to facility-reported events and personal belongings inventory management for 1 (#57) of 6 sampled residents. The deficient practice placed all residents at elevated risk for theft or loss of personal belongings. Findings include: During an interview on 5/5/25 at 12:02 p.m., staff member C stated the QAPI committee reviewed reportable events as part of their monthly agenda. Staff member C stated the previous administrator would have been responsible for resident #57's facility-reportable event submission, tracking, and reporting to QAPI, however the previous administrator was no longer employed by the facility. Staff member C stated the new administrator was out of town and unavailable for interview. Review of a facility-reported event, submitted to the State Survey Agency on 12/30/24, showed resident #57's family reported missing approximately $800 in cash that was inventoried on admission. The family reported the missing cash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of a cognitively impaired resident's property from loss or theft, when the resident admitted with a very large sum of money, which was in his possession, but was not returned or found upon the resident's death, for 1 (#57) of 6 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a facility-reported event, submitted to the State Survey Agency on 12/31/24, showed resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and passed away on 11/30/24; the resident had $891.00 in cash which was noted on the resident's inventory on his admission, and there was $833.00 unaccounted for when resident #57's wallet was returned to the resident's spouse. During an interview on 5/6/25 at 2:22 p.m., NF1 stated #57 was at the facility for 12 days, and passed away on 11/30/24. NF1 stated when the resident was admitted , she was not asked to address the safekeeping of the $891.00 in cash in the resident's possession. NF1 stated after #57…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to report investigative findings for a reportable event, within the required timeframe, for 1 (#4) of 6 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a facility-reported incident, submitted to the State Survey Agency on 3/11/25, showed resident #4 had an unwitnessed fall in the bathroom, and #4 sustained a humerus fracture. The facility's investigative findings were not reported to the State Survey Agency until 3/19/25; one day after the submission deadline. During an interview on 5/7/25 at 1:23 p.m., staff member B stated she had been responsible for submitting the facility's reportable incidents through the Bounds system after the previous Administrator resigned. Staff member B stated the findings for all investigations should be reported to the State Survey Agency within five working days of the date the incident occurred. Staff member B stated she was aware of the delay in completing the investigative report of findings on the 3/11/25 fall incident, but did not recall why the delay occurred. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-19 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit the mandatory staffing information for the fourth quarter of federal fiscal year 2024, as required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. Findings include: Review of a CMS report titled, PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated 12/10/24, showed the facility triggered for the failure to submit data for the quarter, and for, One Star Staffing Rating. The facility was notified on 12/16/24, during the entrance conference, the facility triggered for the failure to submit staffing data for the fourth quarter of federal fiscal year 2024 (July, August, and September of 2024). Staff member B stated they would provide copies of the staffing reports, which were submitted by staff member I. During an observation and interview on 12/19/24 at 8:45 a.m., staff member I demonstrated how she submitted the mandatory staffing data required by CMS. Staff member I accessed the Monthly Nursing Home Staffing Report link on the Montana DPHHS website, to submit the facility's staffing data. The link used to submit the data was a Montana state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all controlled substance medications were accurately administered, accounted, and documented for 4 (#s 24, 27, 38, and 109) of 4 sampled and supplemental residents receiving physician ordered controlled substances. Findings include: Review of the Facility Reported Incident, submitted to the State Survey Agency, dated 9/27/24, showed an investigation was initiated and completed by the facility in response to an internal audit of medication reconciliation for controlled substances. Review of the Facility Reported Incident investigative file, provided by the facility on 12/18/24, showed the following: - Three licensed nursing staff members (NF4, NF5, and NF6) were suspended during the investigation and all three were subsequently terminated following completion of the investigation by the facility. - The information identified during the investigation was submitted to the Montana State Board of Nursing. - Residents #24, 27, 38, and 109 were investigated by staff to determine if the errors with controlled substances and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene and appropriate use of personal protective equipment, during care of residents on enhanced barrier precautions, for 1 (#43) of 18 sampled residents. During an observation on 12/18/24 at 9:04 a.m., staff member F was training a new staff nurse, staff member G, on medication pass for residents. Staff member F went into resident #43's room to set up an area to administer scheduled medications by enteral (tube) feeding. Staff member F put on a pair of gloves before entering resident #43's room to administer the medications. Staff member F left resident #43's room to go to a supply room to obtain supplies for the tube feeding with the same pair of gloves on. Staff member F returned to resident #43's room to administer the medications, and did not change the gloves worn out of the room to the supply area, or back. No hand hygiene was performed. Staff member F did not use a gown when the tube feeding was started. The tube feeding was performed without comment from resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility nursing staff failed to meet professional standards of quality by not ensuring all controlled substance medications were accurately accounted for and documented in a resident's EHR, for 3 (#s 1, 4, and 7) of 3 sampled residents for medications. This deficient practice affected the accuracy of medication administration records, had the potential to result in administration errors, and to allow unidentified controlled substance diversion to occur. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #1's MARs, dated January and February of 2024, showed five days all doses of hydromorphone, one-half of a 5 mg tablet, were removed and signed out by either staff member D or staff member E, and not documented on resident #1's MAR. Days included: 1/18/24, 1/19/24, 1/19/24, 1/20/24, 1/23/24. Refer to F755 for detailed information for dates/times for resident #1. There were no negative outcomes identified for the resident. 2. Review of resident #4's MARs, dated January and February of 2024, showed seven days not all doses of oxycodone-acetaminophen,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a system that accounted for all Schedule II controlled substance medications, from receipt to administration or destruction, for 3 (#s 1, 4, and 7) of 3 sampled residents for medications. The deficient practice resulted in a discrepancy between the number of doses removed from secure storage, and the number of doses administered to a resident, which allowed for an increased risk for diversion of controlled substance medications. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #1's Individual Narcotic Records, dated 1/17/24 and 1/19/24, showed 50 total doses were removed from secure storage. The following 11 doses of hydromorphone one-half of a 2 mg tablets did not have a corresponding administration documented on the resident's MAR: - 1/18/24 at 11:45 a.m., two halves of a 2 mg tablet, 2 mg dose, - 1/19/24 at 6:30 a.m., two halves of a 2 mg tablet, 2 mg dose, - 1/19/24 at 4:00 p.m., one-half of a 2 mg tablet, 1 mg dose, - 1/19/24 at 4:00 p.m., one-half of a 2 mg tablet, 1 mg dose, - 1/20/24 at 8:45 a.m., two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse by a staff member for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of a Facility Reported Incident, dated 1/3/24, showed resident #2 had an interaction with staff member J. The incident showed resident #2 was joking with (staff member J) and she was joking back and hit his arm and it hurt. Resident #2 stated he did not think the staff member intended to inflict pain, but did not know why staff member J did it. The report showed staff member J was terminated after the investigation was completed. During an observation and interview on 2/13/24 at 12:15 p.m., resident #2 was in the dining room for a meal. Resident #2 was smiling and visiting with other residents. Resident #2 stated he remembered the incident, but could not remember what they were joking about, and did not know why staff member J hit him. Review of the investigative file, for the incident which occurred on 1/3/24, showed staff member J was suspended during the investigation. Resident #2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were accurately coded on the resident's MDS for 1 (#21) of 5 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of resident #21's Significant Change MDS, with an ARD of 10/1/23, showed the resident had received insulin on one day during the seven-day lookback period. Review of resident #21's MAR, dated December of 2023, showed the resident did not have an order for insulin to be administered. The resident's MAR showed an order, dated 10/1/23, for Trulicity 0.75 mg injections to be given every Sunday. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 12:47 p.m., staff member C stated she coded Trulicity, a non-insulin medication used with insulin for glycemic control. After researching the drug classification for Trulicity, staff member C stated she thought the medication was insulin and had incorrectly coded it on the Significant Change MDS, with an ARD of 10/1/23.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan after completion of a course of antibiotics for tooth pain, for 1 (#22) of 1 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of resident #22's physician order, dated 8/29/23, showed an order for amoxicillin 500 mg three times a day for seven days. Review of resident #12's MAR, dated September of 2023, showed the amoxicillin was completed on 9/3/23. Review of resident #22's care plan, dated 9/5/23, showed the resident had a problem related to antibiotic therapy for tooth pain, and interventions involved the administration of the ordered antibiotic, monitoring for effectiveness, and any adverse effects associated with the administration of the antibiotic. The care plan, accessed on 12/6/23, failed to show resolution of the problem after the antibiotics were completed. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 2:24 p.m., staff member B stated resident #22's care plan should have been revised to show the resolution of the antibiotics for tooth pain in September of 2023.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the bathing and dining needs were completed for those residents requiring assistance for 5 (#s 6, 8, 10, 13, and 14) of 14 sampled residents. This failure resulted in a delay of residents receiving showers, and a delay in residents receiving meals and assistance, in a timely manner. Findings include: 1. Bathing: During an interview on 10/11/23 at 2:36 p.m., resident #8 said his shower days were Monday and Thursday. He said he had just moved back to his room from staying in the COVID unit. Resident #8 said a CNA on the COVID unit told him he would not be getting a shower while on the unit because he would spread COVID to the shower and other residents. Resident #8 said he stinks and was hoping to get a shower and not have to wait until his regular shower day. Resident #8 has a diagnosis of spina bifida and neurogenic bladder. Review of resident #8's care plan, dated 3/21/19, showed resident #8 would like two baths per week. Bathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an adequate number of staff were available for necessary care and services for bathing and dining needs for 5 (#s 6, 8, 10, 13, and 14) of 14 sampled residents. This failure resulted in residents not receiving showers and a delay in residents receiving meals and assistance in a timely manner. Findings include: 1. Bathing: During an interview on 10/11/23 at 2:36 p.m., resident #8 said his shower days were Monday and Thursday. He said he had just moved back to his room from staying in the COVID unit. Resident #8 said a CNA on the COVID unit told him he would not be getting a shower because the staff were busy due to COVID related illness in the building. Resident #8 said he stinks and was hoping to get a shower and not have to wait until his regular shower day. Resident #8 stated there is not enough staff on the weekends and they only have two CNAs to get everybody up in the morning. During an interview on 10/11/23 at 9:30 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident from neglect by a staff member by not providing care when answering a call light for 1 (#8) of 5 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of a facility reported incident showed resident #8 alleged on 4/4/23, NF1 came into answer the call light, turned it off, and left without talking to him. Resident #8 said it was not the first time his call light was turned off and he was not provided care by NF1. Review of the facility investigation for the allegations made on 4/4/23, showed the facility suspended and interviewed NF1. Staff member A interviewed NF1 on 4/4/23 regarding the allegation of turning off call lights without providing resident care. NF1 admitted to turning off resident call lights without providing care. NF1 considered repeated use of the call light to be a resident behavior. The facility reported the allegation to the local police, Adult Protective Services Agency, State Survey Agency, and the staffing agency. Staff member F interviewed all residents assigned to NF1 on 4/4/23. Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a wheel chair was evaluated as a possible restraint for 1 (#10) of 14 sampled residents. Resident #10 was not able to use the wheel chair for mobility and relied on staff to get her from her room to activities and meals. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 10/11/23 at 9:30 a.m., resident #10 stated she cannot touch the floor with her feet while seated in her wheel chair. Resident #10 stated she no longer goes to the dining room for meals because she would have to wait 30-45 minutes for staff to wheel her back to her room. Resident #10 stated she could wheel herself if her feet would touch the floor. Resident #10 stated she spends from 6:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. seated in her wheel chair. Resident #10 stated she would like to be able to propel herself independently around the facility and visit with other residents because she was the resident council president. Observation of the resident seated in her wheel chair showed her feet did not touch the floor. Resident #10 stated she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-12-19 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of the reason for a facility-initiated transfer to the resident or the resident's representative, for 3 (#s 7, 37, and 111) of 18 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 9:59 a.m., staff member D stated the nursing staff were responsible for telling the residents the reason for their transfer to the hospital. Staff member D stated, The nurses let me know, and I complete the transfer form for the medical record. Staff member D stated she did not know the facility was required to provide written notification of transfer to the residents, stating, The form is in the computer, and they can always ask for a copy, but I didn't know we were supposed to provide a copy before they transferred. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 2:12 p.m., staff member E stated when a resident was transferred to the hospital, the nurses completed a transfer report form for the hospital staff, and told the resident or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-12-19 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required bed hold notice to the resident or the resident's representatives prior to, or timely after, a transfer, for 3 (#s 7, 37 and 111) of 18 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 12/18/24 at 9:59 a.m., staff member D stated she was responsible for completing the bed hold agreements when nursing staff notified her a resident was transferred to the hospital. Staff member D reported no written documentation of the bed hold agreements were provided to the residents or their representatives. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 2:12 p.m., staff member E stated when a resident was transferred to the hospital, the social services department was responsible for completing the bed hold agreement. 1. During a telephone interview on 12/18/24 at 3:40 p.m., NF2 stated the staff, . usually call or text me when (resident #7) is taken to the hospital, but I never received anything in writing. NF2 stated, I don't know anything about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$7,163 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $7,163 — penalty dated 2023-10-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 43 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alaska Gardens Health and RehabilitationTacoma, WA 1 of 5El Jen Skilled CareLas Vegas, NV 1 of 5Firesteel Healthcare CenterMitchell, SD 1 of 5Gardnerville Health & Rehabilitation CenterGardnerville, NV 1 of 5Livingston Health & Rehabilitation CenterLivingston, MT 1 of 5Palisade Healthcare CenterGarretson, SD 1 of 5Portland Health And RehabilitationPortland, OR 1 of 5Riverview Healthcare CenterFlandreau, SD 1 of 5Shepherd of the Valley Rehabilitation and WellnessCasper, WY 1 of 5Worland Health and RehabilitationWorland, WY 2 of 5Aspen Meadows Health And Rehabilitation CenterBillings, MT 2 of 5Canterbury HouseAuburn, WA 2 of 5Enumclaw Health and RehabilitationEnumclaw, WA 2 of 5Granite Rehabilitation and WellnessCheyenne, WY 2 of 5Independence Health And RehabilitationIndependence, OR 2 of 5Laramie Health and RehabilitationLaramie, WY 2 of 5Mountain View Health And RehabilitationCarson City, NV 2 of 5North Cascades Health and RehabilitationBellingham, WA 2 of 5Seattle Medical Post Acute CareSeattle, WA 2 of 5Shelton Health and RehabilitationShelton, WA 2 of 5Village Health CareGresham, OR 2 of 5Wind River Rehabilitation and WellnessRiverton, WY 3 of 5Fountain Springs HealthcareRapid City, SD 3 of 5La Grande Post Acute RehabLa Grande, OR 3 of 5Pahrump Health And RehabilitationPahrump, NV 3 of 5Prairie View Healthcare CenterWoonsocket, SD 3 of 5Rawlins Rehabilitation and WellnessRawlins, WY 3 of 5Royal Park Health and RehabilitationSpokane, WA 3 of 5Sage View Care CenterRock Springs, WY 3 of 5Thermopolis Rehabilitation and WellnessThermopolis, WY 3 of 5Wheatcrest Hills Healthcare CenterBritton, SD 3 of 5Windsor Health And RehabilitationSalem, OR 4 of 5Americana Health and RehabilitationLongview, WA 4 of 5Buena Vista HealthcareColville, WA 4 of 5Frontier Rehabilitation and Extended CareLongview, WA 4 of 5Hillsboro Health And RehabilitationHillsboro, OR 4 of 5Hot Springs Health & Rehabilitation CenterHot Springs, MT 4 of 5Missoula Health & Rehabilitation CenterMissoula, MT 4 of 5Polson Health & Rehabilitation CenterPolson, MT 4 of 5The Dalles Health And RehabilitationThe Dalles, OR

Showing 40 of 43; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
PACIFIC NORTHWEST SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS (MT) LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/31/2023
CH PACIFIC NORTHWEST HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
PACIFIC NORTHWEST SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/31/2023
WITZCORP GLOBAL LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
HERZKA, YISROELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
YENOWITZ, YITZCHOKIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
JOHNSON, REBECCAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
LOWE, LEONORIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
COUVE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2026
COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2025
LAUREL SNF OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2025
MONTANA SNF CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2025
PACIFIC NORTHWEST OPCO MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2025
MANSFIELD, JAMEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
RODENBERGER, MONICAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
SEVERA, LARRYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
SPIELMAN, SHIMONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$126K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 9%Other / private 25%

This home reported $126K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$308per resident / day
operating cost
$9,364per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$295per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Montana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Montana
$8,973/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,075/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 275111. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next