Frontier Rehabilitation and Extended Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 163 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 100.5 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives received information about the risk and benefits and obtain informed consent prior to the use of a Wander Guard (a device that detects when a resident approaches or passes through a monitored exit door, preventing elopement) for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 102) reviewed for Wander Guard use. These failures placed residents and/or their representatives at risk of not being fully informed about the care and treatment related to the risks and benefits associated with the use of a Wander Guard.Findings Included.Review of the facility's Elopement/Wandering policy, dated February 2025, documented, if monitoring systems are used: 1. If it is determined that the resident is at risk for elopement and the center has a resident monitoring system installed, the following protocol is followed: a. The center notifies the resident or resident's responsible party of the results of the evaluation.Resident 102 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and/or maintain Advance Directives (AD) and/or Guardianship for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 14) reviewed for AD. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their healthcare preferences honored and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated [DATE], documented Resident 14 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that causes dementia, a decline in cognitive function), Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Down Syndrome (a genetic condition that affects brain and body development leading to intellectual disabilities), and was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident 14's Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 14 had a Letter of Guardianship / Conservatorship from the Superior Court of [NAME], County of Cowlitz, dated [DATE]. Further review of Resident 14's EHR showed The Letter of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) was completed accurately to reflect a resident's health status and/or care needs for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 102 and 9) reviewed for accidents. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Resident 102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 02/23/2026, indicated Resident 102 was severely cognitively impaired. Record review of Resident 102's Elopement Risk Evaluation, dated 02/23/2026, indicated Resident 102 was at risk for elopement related to (r/t) dementia (a decline in cognitive function severe enough to impair daily life, caused by progressive brain damage). Record review of Resident 102's care plan, dated 03/09/2026, indicated the problem, Resident 102 has impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I, a screening tool used to identify mental health needs, was requested upon a significant change of condition for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 12) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed the residents at risk of unidentified mental health needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record Review of the facility's policy, titled, PASRR Process Policy and Procedure, revised January 2025, documented, .4. If there is a significant change of condition that affects their diagnosed need for a PASRR II, staff refer for a NEW PASRR level II. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses to include major depressive disorder (mood disorder characterized by persistent depressed mood), anxiety disorder (disorder characterized by excessive fear and worry), and psychotic disorder (severe mental illness causing to lose touch with reality). The Quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 106) reviewed for Rehabilitation and Restorative. This failure placed residents at risk for avoidable decline in function and a diminished quality of life.Findings Included. Resident 106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 02/03/2026, documented Resident 9 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 04/20/2026 at 12:07 PM, Resident 106 said he was concerned about his hip. Resident 106 said he needed a Hoyer lift (a mechanical device that uses a sling to safely lift and transfer people with limited mobility between surfaces) for transfers. Resident 106 said he was not getting any rehabilitation or restorative services. In an observation and interview on 04/22/2026 at 12:56 PM, Resident 106 was observed sitting up in bed eating lunch. Resident 106 said he still had not received any restorative therapy and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care for dependent residents to include nail care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 67), reviewed for ADLs. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed.Findings included . Resident 67 was admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 67's care plan, dated 04/08/2026, documented the problem for Resident 67 was an ADL [activities of daily living - basic self-care task to include nail care] self-care performance deficit r/t [related to] Dementia [a decline in cognitive function-memory, thinking, and behavior-severe enough to impair daily life, caused by progressive brain damage]. The care plan intervention - Diabetic Nail care by LN [licensed nurse]. Record review of Resident 67's Kardex (a centralized record of resident's care plan), dated 04/08/2026, indicated Diabetic Nail care by LN. Record review of Resident 67's Treatment Administration Record's, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain and/or initiate physician orders for use of a Wander Guard alarm (a security system that uses a wearable tag and/or sensor designed to prevent people with cognitive impairments from leaving secure areas to ensure their safety, by triggering alerts to caregivers) for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 9) reviewed for accidents. This failure placed residents at risk of injury, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Record Review of the facility's policy titled, Elopement/Wandering, updated February 2025, documented, . If monitoring systems are used: . b. The center obtains a physician's order for the use of the device prior to application. c. The LN [Licensed Nurse] also obtains an order to complete an evaluation for placement and function every shift. Documentation to occur on the MAR [Medication Administration Record] or TAR [Treatment Administration Record] . Resident 9 was admitted to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing information was accurately posted and/or updated daily with resident census for 5 of 5 observed days posted, and with the facility name for 34 of 34 days reviewed for nurse staff postings. This failure placed residents, resident representatives, and visitors at risk of not being fully informed of current staffing level and facility information.Findings included. In an observation on 04/20/2026 at 10:14 AM, two Daily Nursing Staffing Information postings, dated 04/19/2026 and 04/20/2026, were observed posted on the wall in the entrance lobby of the facility. There was no title and/or label observed on the wall near the postings with the facility name. Further review of both postings showed the resident census was blank and the facility name was not on the postings. In an observation on 04/21/2026 at 8:10 AM, two Daily Nursing Staffing Information postings, dated 04/20/2026 and 04/21/2026, were observed posted on the wall in the entrance lobby of the facility. Further review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bowel management interventions were initiated and/or implemented for 2 of 5 sampled residents (61 & 295), failed to ensure physician orders were initiated and/or implemented for 1 of 4 sampled residents (57), and failed to ensure care plan interventions to elevate feet were implemented for 1 of 7 sampled residents (86) reviewed for quality of care. These failures placed residents at risk for unnecessary discomfort, health complications, and a diminished quality of care and quality of life. Finding included . <Bowel Management> The facility's policy entitled, Bowel Protocol, updated 03/2018, documented, If a resident does not have a bowel movement for three days, the nurse administers the physician ordered bowel program . in the event the center has no specific bowel program the nurse administers medication as ordered as followed: --Administer milk of magnesia per physician order on day four. --If milk of magnesia offers no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to use personal possessions in their room, including a personal refrigerator, that did not infringe on the rights of other residents for 1 of 1 sampled residents (17) reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed the resident at a risk of a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Facility policy entitled Resident personal refrigerators and food brought in by family and visitors, updated August 2020, documented, under procedure 6 Residents or responsible party may provide their own UL [Underwriters Laboratories, an organization that tests and certifies products to ensure public safety] approved personal refrigerator for use in their room, provided the room can accommodate the refrigerator's electrical load and physical space. Designated refrigerators are available in the Center for storage of resident foods. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia. The quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $224K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA