Village Health Care
3955 SE 182nd Avenue, Gresham, OR 97030 · For profit - Corporation · 106 certified beds · (503) 665-0183 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $22,695 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-05)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.2% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.4% | 4.7% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.4% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.4% | 2.0% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.1% | 4.9% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 39.1% | 20.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.8% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 71.4% | 95.2% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.9% | 5.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.3% | 21.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.6% | 13.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 35.5% | 81.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.3% | 21.4% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.2% | 16.1% | 12.0% | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 153 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 41.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.0%CMS range 48.3–62.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 8.0–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 41.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 33.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 89.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.2–10.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.79 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 70.8 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.17 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively assess a resident for the use of an electric wheelchair and develop new interventions to reduce the risk of falls for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 3 and 73) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in Resident 73 sustaining a five-centimeter laceration (a jagged wound or cut in the flesh) to her/his right anterior (toward the front) lower leg, multiple leg fractures and a brief syncopal episode (fainting or passing out) secondary to blood loss. Findings include: The facility's 1/2025 Physical Restraints and Enablers/Devices Policy indicated a Device Evaluation was completed prior to a device being initiated. The resident and/or representative is provided risks/benefits of device use and consent obtained prior to its implementation. The individual service plan is updated to identify device use and identifies other interventions put into place addressing medical symptoms, environmental safety and psychosocial concerns. The facility's 1/2025 Fall Management Policy indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-05-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for medications. As a result, Resident 3 experienced significant clinical symptoms (increased swelling of the extremities, lowered oxygen levels and shortness of breath) related to the medication error and had a 10-day hospitalization stay. Findings include: Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (damage to the airways and air sacs in the lungs which make it difficult to breathe) and congestive heart failure (a weakened heart condition the causes fluid buildup in the feet, arms, lungs and other organs). Resident 3's 1/10/25 nursing notes indicated she/he was alert and oriented and was able to make her/his needs known. On 2/4/25, the facility submitted a report to the State Survey Agency which revealed Resident 3 did not receive her/his lasix (a diuretic which reduces fluid buildup), which resulted in her/his hospitalization and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor temperatures in the medication refrigerators for 3 of 3 medication refrigerators. This places residents at risk for receiving ineffective medications or vaccinations. Findings include:On 6/5/26, the CDC requires facilities to monitor temperatures in medication refrigerators to maintain a temperature between 36 and 46 degrees Fahrenheit (F).On 6/4/26 at 1:13PM, Staff 3 (Regional Director of Clinical Operations) provided the temperature logs for three medication refrigerators.A review of Station 1's medication temperature log for 5/2026 revealed missing temperatures on 5/1/26, 5/2/26, 5/8/26, 5/11/26, 5/14/26, 5/15/26, 5/16/26, 5/17/26, 5/22/26, and 5/29/26 (10 days).A review of Station 2's medication temperature log for 5/2026 revealed missing temperatures on 5/1/26, 5/2/26, 5/3/26, 5/4/26, 5/5/26, 5/9/26, 5/10/26, 5/16/26, and 5/17/26 (nine days).A review of Station 3's medication temperature log for 5/2026 revealed missing temperatures on 5/1/26, 5/2/26, 5/3/26, 5/4/26, 5/5/26,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were allowed to retain and use personal possessions for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#50) reviewed for edema. This placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life. Findings include:The facility's Notice of Resident Rights Under Oregon State Law policy, dated 7/2025 indicated residents had the right to keep and use personal clothing and possessions as space permitted unless to do so infringed on other residents' rights and unless medically contraindicated. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility in 9/2025 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (an ongoing long-term condition where the respiratory system cannot adequately oxygenate the blood), COPD (a group of progressive long-term lung conditions that cause irreversible damage to the airways), dependence on oxygen, anxiety and insomnia. Resident 50's 9/5/25 Social Services admission and History Evaluation indicated the resident slept in a wheelchair because it helped her/him to breathe better.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents could access their closets independently for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#23) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This placed residents at risk for inability to access personal belongings. Findings include: Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with diagnoses of right and left knee replacements and difficulty walking. Resident 23's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified the resident as having intact cognitive function, used a walker and wheelchair for mobility, and required set up and supervision with transfers and walking. A care plan dated 4/1/26 revealed Resident 23 utilized a wheelchair and required one person assistance with walking. Observations of Resident 23's room on 6/1/26 at 10:48 AM. 6/3/26 at 9:45 AM, and 6/4/26 at 3:02 PM revealed Resident 23 and the roommate's beds were positioned directly facing each other. Each bed was centered on its assigned wall beneath the overbed light.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide a written bed-hold notice at the time of hospital transfer for 1 of 1 resident (#76), provide residents with the necessary written documentation related to hospital transfer and discharge and did not notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 2 of 3 residents (#s76 and 78) reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. This placed residents at risk for lack of being informed, financial responsibilities and Ombudsman advocacy. Findings include: The facility's 5/2025 Bed Hold Policy indicated: The resident and/or representative is informed of the Bed Hold Policy in writing upon admission, transfer, or leave of absence. Upon transfer or discharge, the nursing department provides the resident and/or resident representative with a copy of the Notice of Bed Hold Policy. The facility's 5/2025 Transfer and Discharge Policy indicated: The facility sends a copy of the notice to the State Long-Term Ombudsman.1. Resident 76 was admitted in 4/2026 with diagnoses including streptococcal infection (bacterial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects to medications. Findings include:Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure) and heart failure.A 11/21/25 order for metoprolol succinate (a medication used to treat hypertension) indicated the medication was to be held if the pulse was less than 55 beats per minute (bpm).A review of the 5/2026 and 6/2026 MAR revealed no documentation on the MAR of Resident 7's pulse.A review of the pulse record revealed no pulse was taken on 5/1/26, 5/3/26, 5/11/26, 5/14/26, 5/24/26, 5/26/26, 5/27/26, 5/30/26, and 6/1/26.A review of the pulse record revealed Resident 7's pulse was taken after the medications were administered on 5/7/26, 5/8/26, 5/10/26, 5/15/26, and 5/31/26.A review of the pulse record revealed Resident 7's pulse was less than 55 and metoprolol succinate was administered on 5/12/26, 5/18/26,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's ordered pain medication was available to the resident 17 out 186 dose administration opportunities for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#56) reviewed for pain management. This placed residents at risk for uncontrolled pain. Findings include: Resident 56 admitted to the facility in 11/2021 with diagnoses including chronic pain syndrome.Resident 56's Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, frequently experienced pain in the previous five days, and reported a nine out of ten on a pain scale (a scale indicating a person's pain level where zero equals no pain).Review of Resident 56's clinical records revealed a physician order for Aspercreme Lidocaine Cream 4%, which was active since 3/9/26, instructed the facility to administer the pain medication to the resident's neck and left shoulder two times per day for pain. Review of Resident 56's 3/2026 Treatment Administration Record (TAR), 4/2026 TAR,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to offer pneumococcal immunizations for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 7 and 56) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for pneumonia. Findings include:Review of the facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine policy, dated 6/19/25, instructed the facility to follow the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults guide to determine appropriate vaccination and cadence. Review of the CDC's Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults, dated March 2025, revealed there were four types of pneumococcal vaccines available in the United States: pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV15, PCV20, and PCV21) and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23). For adults 65 years or older who have not previously received any pneumococcal vaccine, CDC recommends you give 1 dose of PCV20 or PCV21. If PCV15 is used, this should be followed by a dose of PPSV23 at least one year later. For adults 65 years or older who have only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement proper safety protocols for bathing equipment, which contributed to a fall for 1 of 3 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for falls. This placed resident at risk for injury. Findings include:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including spinal stenosis (spinal canal narrowing resulting in pain, numbness, or weakness) and chronic kidney disease. A care plan dated 9/9/25 revealed Resident 1 required partial to moderate assistance with bathing and bathing transfer tasks.A Fall Without Fracture Incident Report dated 11/10/25 completed by Staff 4 (RN) stated Resident 1 received assistance from Staff 8 (NA Student) with transporting her/him back to her/his room in a rolling shower chair. When Staff 8 attempted to cross over the transition strip to Resident 1's room, the rolling shower chair got stuck in the transition strip on the floor of the door frame. Staff 8 attempted to lift the rolling shower chair from the backrest which resulted in the backrest becoming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to re-evaluate preventative interventions in the presence of new pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 (#1) sampled residents reviewed for skin issues. This placed residents at risk for developing new pressure ulcers. Findings include:Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 4/2024, with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction.Resident 1 no longer resided in the facility and could not be observed or interviewed.Resident 1's 4/21/25 care plan revealed Resident 1 had potential impairment to skin integrity related to history of CVA (stroke) with left sided deficits/neglect, impaired mobility, poor insight to limitations, incontinence, history of weight loss and other comorbidities. Interventions included avoid scratching, keep body parts from excessive moisture, keep fingernails short, follow facility protocols for treatment of injury, identify and document potential causative factors and eliminate/resolve where possible, off load when in bed, frequent repositioning while in wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and infection control practices were followed during CBG monitoring for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#22) reviewed for dialysis and failed to ensure enhanced barrier and transmission based precautions were followed for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control precautions. This placed residents at risk for infections, communicable diseases and cross-contamination. Findings include: 1. The Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, 10th edition, Fundamentals of Standard Precautions for Hand Hygiene indicated hand hygiene is the single most recommended measure to reduce the risk of transmitting micro-organisms. Hand hygiene should be performed between patient contacts; after contact with blood, body fluids, secretions and excretions, and contaminated equipment or articles; before donning and after removing gloves is vital for infection control. The American Health Care Association National Infection Prevention Forum Tips for Meeting the Cleaning and Disinfecting of Blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0572 — patternGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were notified their of rights both orally and in writing on an ongoing basis for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Resident Council. This placed residents at risk for not being informed of their rights. Findings include: On 1/30/25 at 11:00 AM the Resident Council members stated they were not informed of resident rights on an ongoing basis, were unsure if any were posted in the facility, or where to obtain the resident rights. Record review of Resident Council Meeting minutes for 11/12/24, 12/10/24 and 1/17/25 revealed no evidence resident rights were provided to, or reviewed with, residents during the meetings or by any other method. On 1/30/25 at 12:27 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated he believed resident rights were reviewed through Resident Council and was not aware of any other method used to relay resident rights. Staff 1 acknowledged this finding and no additional information was provided.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to deliver mail on Saturdays for 1 of 1 Resident Council reviewed. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely written communications. Findings include: On 1/30/25 at 11:00 AM during the Resident Council group interview, residents stated their mail was not delivered on Saturdays. Review of 11/20024 through 1/2025 resident activity participation charts revealed no evidence mail was delivered to residents on Saturdays. On 1/30/25 at 1:10 PM, Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed there was no system in place to deliver mail to residents on Saturdays.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively assess 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 15, 18 and 33) reviewed for medications, ROM and behaviors. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs and a lack of a person-centered care plan. Findings include: 1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including major depression, schizophrenia, post traumatic stress disorder and anxiety disorder. An annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had mild cognitive impairment with a BIMS of 13. According to the MDS the resident was prescribed daily psychotropic medication including antianxiety, antipsychotic, and antidepressant medication. Under the CAA for psychotropics, the analysis of findings was limited to a list of psychiatric diagnoses, a list of the prescribed psychotropic medications, and a statement that psychotropic meds have been included in [the resident's] Care Plan as a preventative measure. Care Plan will be updated if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including stroke and Aphasia (language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate). Resident 17's 10/13/24 Annual MDS revealed the resident experienced severely impaired cognition. Resident 17 liked listening to music, doing things in groups of people, pets, participating in favorite activities and participating in religious activities or practices. On 1/27/25 at 1:11 PM Witness 4 (Family) stated Resident 17 enjoyed watching television, listening to music, especially jazz, classical and the oldies. Witness 4 stated Resident 17 had a radio in her/his room but they had not seen the radio since last spring. A review of Resident 17's current care plan directed staff to complete the following: - Assist patient to/from activity area. -Coordinate with nursing/therapy staff to get patient up for activities of choice. -Arrange for resident to attend group activities. -Encourage resident to eat in common dining area. -Seat resident near others…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide evidence a designated licensed nurse (LN) served as a charge nurse to provide the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed the residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: The facility's Direct Care Staff Daily Reports revealed from 1/1/25 through 1/27/25, 36 out of 81 shifts were without LN coverage to serve as a charge nurse as follows: -1/1/25; day shift. -1/2/25; day, evening and night shifts. -1/3/25 day shift. -1/6/25; day, evening and night shifts. -1/8/25; night shift. -1/9/25; day and night shifts. -1/10/25; night shift. -1/14/25; day, evening and night shifts. -1/15/25; night shift. -1/17/25; evening and night shift. -1/20/25; day, evening and night shifts -1/21/25; day, evening and night shifts. -1/22/25; day, evening and night shifts. -1/23/25; evening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an RN was available for at least eight consecutive hours per day seven days per week for 9 of 27 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely RN assessments and care. Findings include: Review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports from 1/3/25 through 1/27/25 revealed no RN coverage was available for at least eight consecutive hours per day on the following days: -1/2/25. -1/6/25. -1/13/25. -1/14/25. -1/17/25. -1/20/25. -1/21/25. -1/22/25. -1/24/25. On 1/30/25 at 9:42 AM Staff 17 (Staffing Coordinator) acknowledged the facility lacked RN coverage on the identified days on the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports. No additional information was provided. On 1/30/25 at 9:56 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the facility's failure to meet RN coverage for eight consecutive hours per day on the dates provided. No additional information was provided.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 3) and 1 of 1 facility reviewed for dignity and dining. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 10/2014 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, abnormal weight loss and anxiety. Resident 3's 12/20/24 Annual MDS revealed the resident had no cognitive impairments and had impairments of both upper extremities. Observations of Resident 3 during breakfast and lunch meals from 1/28/25 through 1/30/25 revealed the following: -1/28/25 at 8:52 AM: Resident 3 received two glasses of juice served in plastic medication glasses and cereal served in a medium sized paper bowl. -1/28/25 at 12:48 PM: Resident 3 received two glasses of juice served in plastic medication glasses. -1/29/25 at 8:23 AM: Resident 3 received two glasses of juice served in plastic medication glasses. -1/30/25 at 8:37 AM: Resident 3 received two glasses of juice served in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to inform residents and/or the residents' responsible party of the risks and benefits, and to ensure consent was obtained for the use of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (# 220) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of informed consent. Findings include: The facility's Informed Consent for Psychotropic Drugs, dated 9/2017, revealed the licensed nurse was to: -Discuss the rationale/benefits for the orders as directed by the physician. -Discuss the potential risk factors (side effects/symptoms) of taking the prescribed drug. -Review the content with the resident and obtain their signature if they agreed to take the prescribed drug. Resident 220 was admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including generalized anxiety disorder. Resident 220's 1/2025 MAR revealed the resident received the following psychotropic medications as ordered by her/his physician: -Citralopram Hydrobromide (a medication to treat depression and panic attacks) one time a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were included in care planning for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#28) reviewed for care planning. This placed residents at risk for not being involved in the care planning process. Findings include: Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in 1/8/25 with diagnoses including myocardial infarction (heart attack) and a fractured leg. A review of Resident 28's clinical record revealed she/he was her/his own responsible party. Resident 28's Functional Abilities and Goals assessment dated [DATE] indicated she/he was cognitively independent. No evidence was found in Resident 28's clinical record to indicate she/he was involved in the development of her/his care plan. On 1/27/25 at 10:54 AM Resident 28 stated the facility staff did not speak with her/him to develop her/his care plan and added she/he did not know what was included in her/his care plan. On 1/28/25 at 3:55 PM Staff 3 (RNCM) stated she did not find any evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to determine the appropriateness for the self-administration of medication for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 18 and 60) reviewed for self-administering medication. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration. Findings include: Review of the facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy, dated 9/2017, revealed if a resident desires to self-administer medications, the Self-Medication Evaluation was completed. This evaluation was completed before the resident was able to self-administer medication. 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including a stroke. On 1/30/25 at 12:16 PM Resident 18 was observed to lie in her/his bed with the overbed table placed over her/his lap. On the table was a brown bottle, spray of Fluticasone Propionate Nasal spray, 50mg, within her/his reach. Review of the resident's health record revealed no self-administer medication assessment was completed to determine Resident 18's ability to safely self-administer the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#17) reviewed for call lights. This placed residents at risk for accidents and the inability to call for assistance. Findings include: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including Aphasia (language disorder which affects a person's ability to communicate). Resident 17's 1/29/25 in room care plan directed staff to ensure the resident's call light was in reach. On 1/29/25 at 9:31 AM and 10:47 AM, Resident 17 was observed to lie in her/his bed. The resident's call light was not within reach and was wrapped around the base of the head of the frame. During a 1/30/25 at 11:00 AM Resident Council meeting the residents stated their call lights were often not within reach and were tied to the back of their beds which did not allow them to call for assistance. On 1/30/25 at 12:59 PM Staff 8 (CNA) confirmed Resident 17's call light was not within reach and was tied to the back of her/his bed. On 2/3/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage) notifications to 1 of 3 sampled residents (#34) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. This placed residents and their representatives at risk for unknown financial liabilities. Findings include: Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Medicare A benefits. A 10/11/24 NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) indicated Resident 34's Medicare Part A benefits ended on 10/14/24. Review of Resident 34's health record indicated the resident remained in the facility and was financially responsible for her/his care from 10/15/24 until 12/1/24. There was no documentation indicating the SNF ABN notification was provided to Resident 34 or their representative to inform them of the resident's daily out-of-pocket costs. On 1/29/25 at 12:54 PM Staff 2 (DNS) reported the facility was not providing SNF ABN notifications to residents or their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 25 and 45) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 25 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including diabetes. On 1/28/25 at 12:54 PM Resident 25 was observed to be alert, oriented and was able to effectually express her/his current and past needs and history. Resident 25's 12/21/24 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident's BIMS score was not assessed as she/he was rarely/never understood and no diagnosis was provided to indicate the use of opioid medication. Resident 25's 3/20/24 Annual MDS revealed the resident's BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact) and a diagnosis of chronic pain. On 2/3/25 at 8:08 AM Staff 2 (DNS) was informed of the findings and stated Resident 25's 12/21/24 Quarterly MDS was not accurate and she expected resident assessment to be accurate. 2. Resident 45 was admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with diagnoses including anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a new/accurate Level I PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) when the facility became aware of indicators of a serious mental illness diagnosis and failed to complete a referral for a Level ll PASARR for 1 of 2 sampled residents (# 24) reviewed for PASARR coordination of care. This placed residents with a mental health disorder at risk for delayed care, emotional distress related to mental illness and lack of services to attain their highest practicable well-being. Findings include: Resident 24 admitted to the facility in 6/2022 with diagnoses including Bi-Polar Disorder (episodes of mood swings), Major Depressive Disorder and anxiety. Resident 24's heath record revealed a PASARR l coded for no indication of a serious mental illness was completed by the hospital upon admission on [DATE]. Resident 24's in room care plan directed staff with interventions for the following safety and behavioral concerns: -To give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively develop a resident-centered baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 41 and 220) reviewed for choices and accidents. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: The facility's Baseline Plan of Care policy, last updated 4/2024, indicated the following: -The baseline plan of care included information regarding care and services sufficient to promote safe delivery of care. -Once triggered, the baseline care plan must be addressed and all customizations must be completed on the day of admission. 1. Resident 220 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition of inadequate supply of oxygen to the the body), oxygen dependence, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (a condition in which reduced nutrients lead to changes in body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a plan of care to address resident centered medication management or need for PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) for 2 of 3 residents (#s 24 and 118) reviewed for implementation of physician orders or PASSAR. This placed the residents at risk for emotional distress related to lack of services to attain their highest practicable well-being. Finding include: 1. Resident 118 was admitted in 8/2024 with diagnoses including epilepsy, surgical repair of fractured hip, anxiety disorder and depression. admission orders dated 8/16/24 included clobazam 15 mg twice a day for seizure disorder and diazepam 10 mg gel rectally twice daily as needed for aura (physical, emotional or sensory changes that may proceed seizure activity in some individuals). The admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident had mild cognitive impairment with a BIMS of 13, no mood concerns or behaviors, frequent pain, and received opioid and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care and treatment as care planned for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 25) reviewed for skin conditions and failed to ensure person-centered medication management for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 118) reviewed for implementation of physician orders. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment and unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 118 was admitted to the facility in 8/2024 with diagnoses including surgical repair of a fractured hip, epilepsy, depression and anxiety disorder. admission orders for Resident 118 dated 8/16/24 included clobazam 15 mg twice a day for seizure disorder, diazepam 10 mg gel, rectally, twice daily as needed for aura (physical, emotional or sensory changes that may proceed seizure activity in some individuals) or seizures and buspirone (an anti-anxiety medication). An admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident had mild cognitive impairment with a BIMS of 13, no mood concerns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide glasses repair assistance for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 45) reviewed for vision. This placed residents at risk for decreased visual abilities. Findings include: Resident 45 was admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder. An 8/28/24 MDS Assessment stated Resident 45 used corrective lenses to assist with her/his vision. On 1/29/25 at 9:29 AM Resident 45 was observed wearing glasses. A scratch the size of a quarter was observed on the right lens of Resident 45's glasses. Resident 45 stated this scratch had been on her/his glasses for a long time and it makes her/his vision hazy. On 1/29/25 at 9:41 AM Staff 9 (Activity Director/SSD) stated Resident 45's glasses were damaged as result of a fall which occurred at the facility. On 1/29/25 at 10:46 AM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed Resident 45's glasses should have been repaired or replaced as result of the damage having occurred at the facility.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to regularly provide restorative nursing services to ensure residents maintained or improved their current level of ROM or mobility for 2 of 2 residents (#s 18 and 33) reviewed for mobility. This placed residents at risk for decline in physical functioning. Findings include: 1. Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in 11/2021 with diagnoses including stroke with hemiparesis (partial paralysis on one side of the body). According the resident's Annual MDS dated [DATE] Resident 33 was cognitively intact, It was important to the resident to make choices and to be active. The resident had ROM impairment on one side and used a walker and wheelchair for mobility. Under Restorative Nursing Programs the MDS indicated the resident received no RA services during the seven-day look back period. Resident 33's Comprehensive Care Plan last revised 12/8/24 included a restorative nursing program related to impaired mobility to be provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to update pain medication instructions to include resident centered dosing for 1 of 3 residents (#26) reviewed for pain. This placed the resident at risk for increased pain and anxiety related to inconsistent interpretation of PRN orders. Findings include: Resident 26 was admitted to the facility in 10/2022 with diagnoses including anxiety, cancer and a more recent diagnosis of an abscess of the lower limb. Resident 26's Annual MDS dated [DATE] identified she/he had mild cognitive impairment with a BIMS of 13, experienced pain daily and received scheduled and PRN pain medication. The Pain CAA indicated house providers and licensed nurses monitored and managed the resident's pain control. Review of the resident's physician orders revealed a 11/6/24 order for oxycodone HCl 5 MG, 1 tablet by mouth as needed for Pain three times a day as needed. Resident 26's Comprehensive Care Plan last revised 11/12/24 included a problem statement related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dialysis services were in place including monitoring and communication with the dialysis provider for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 22) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for dialysis complications and delayed treatment. Findings include: The facility's Dialysis policy, last updated 3/2015, indicated the following: -The facility communicated with the dialysis center by completing the dialysis transfer form and sending new labs obtained. -The facility required the dialysis center to provide information, including pre-dialysis and post-dialysis weights, labs and results obtained at dialysis, medications given at the dialysis center and follow-up care or procedures needing to be done at the facility. -If the facility nurse did not receive the requested information from the dialysis center, a call was to be placed to request the information. -If the dialysis center did not provide the needed information, the nurse should notify the DNS and the DNS would contact the dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to respond to pharmacy recommendations for limiting use of PRN antipsychotic to 14 days for 1 of 5 residents (#15) reviewed for medication regimen. Findings include: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 5/2019 with diagnoses including major depression, schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the December 2024 and January 2025 MARs revealed an order for Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 25 mg every six hours PRN agitation/anxiety in addition to scheduled doses. The Seroquel had a start date of 12/2/24 and an end date of 1/28/25 when the order changed to a 14 day duration. On 1/30/25 at 11:15 AM Staff 13 (Corporate Nurse Consultant) stated there was no evidence the December pharmacy review was completed or acted upon. On 1/31/25 at 10:01 AM in a telephone interview Staff 20 (Consultant Pharmacist) stated he sent a review and note to the prescriber on 12/20/24 and 1/27/25 regarding the need for the 14 day limit and to ensure evidence of in-person physician visits.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on Interview and record review it was determined the facility failed ensure PRN use of an antipsychotic was limited to 14 days for 1 of 5 residents (#15) for whom medications were reviewed. This placed the resident at increased risk for unnecessary use of psychotropic medications. Findings include: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including major depression, schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the December 2024 and January 2025 MARs revealed an order for Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 25 mg every six hours PRN for agitation/anxiety in addition to scheduled doses. The Seroquel had a start date of 12/2/24 and an end date of 1/28/25 when the order changed to a 14 day duration. Review of the MAR for December 2024 revealed the PRN dose was used 15 times. January 2025 revealed the PRN Seroquel was used eight times. On 1/30/25 at 11:15 AM Staff 13 (Corporate Nurse Consultant) confirmed the PRN Seroquel should have been limited to 14 days.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately document physician orders for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 220 and 269 ) reviewed for choices and pain. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate medical records and risk for injury and/or decreased ability for recovery. Findings include: 1. Resident 220 was admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (a condition in which reduced nutrients lead to changes in body functioning), stroke and anxiety disorder. Resident 220's 1/20/25 post-discharge hospital orders indicated the resident was discharged to the facility with physician orders for mechanical soft diet textures (a modified diet consisting of soft, easy to chew foods). Resident 220's 1/20/25 Admission-readmission Nursing Evaluation indicated the resident was admitted to the facility with physician orders for mechanical soft diet textures. Resident 220's 1/20/25 facility's physician orders indicated the resident received minced and moist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a periodic review regarding advance directives was completed for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 1, 2, 29 and 32) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for not having their health care wishes honored. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 6/2022 with diagnoses including femur fracture and schizophrenia. Resident 1's 6/2022 admission MDS indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 1's face sheet revealed the Power of Attorney was her/his daughter. Review of Resident 1's health care record indicated there was no follow-up completed regarding the resident's advance directive information. On 6/8/23 at 12:21 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged there was no system in place to periodically review residents' advance directive information. 2. Resident 2 was readmitted to the facility in 6/2022. Resident 2's 7/2023 Quarterly MDS indicated she/he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident 2's health care record indicated there was no follow-up completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Report (DCSDR) postings were accurate for 17 of 36 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for incorrect staffing information. Findings include: Review of the 8/1/23 through 9/5/23 DCSDRs indicated the following days when the number of CNA staff and CNA hours worked were inaccurate on the daily postings: -8/1, 8/2, 8/4, 8/5, 8/6, 8/7, 8/8, 8/9, 8/11, 8/13, 8/17, 8/22, 8/23, 8/24, 8/31, 9/2 and 9/5. On 9/7/23 at 2:53 PM Staff 8 (Human Resource Director) confirmed the facility's failure to accurately complete required information on the DCSDRs.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's missing personal property was addressed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#34) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for loss of personal items. Findings include: Resident 34 was admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with diagnoses including a fractured hip and stroke with right sided paralysis. On 9/5/23 at 11:24 AM Resident 34 stated she/he had an heirloom back scratcher given to her/him as a gift and had a lot of sentimental value. Resident 34 stated several months ago, a staff member took the back scratcher away from her/him. The resident reported she/he spoke with several staff and asked to have the back scratcher returned but she/he had not heard anything further. Resident 34 stated she/he just wants it back because it was a gift from my step-dad and means a lot to me. On 9/6/23 at 1:25 PM and 1:48 PM Staff 4 (Social Service Director) and Staff 5 (Social Service Assistant) stated they were not aware Resident 34 was missing a back scratcher. Staff 4 stated no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#20) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including chronic headache and long term use of anticoagulant medication. 1. A 7/21/23 physician order indicated Resident 20 was prescribed cetirizine (an allergy medication) two times a day for allergies. A review of Resident 20's 8/1/23 through 8/31/23 MAR indicated the resident's cetirizine was not administered according to the physician orders on the following days: -8/21 evening dosage and -8/29 evening dosage. On 9/7/23 at 12:17 PM and 9/8/23 at 10:51 AM Staff 3 (LPN-Care Manager) and Staff 2 (DNS) reviewed Resident 20's cetirizine MAR and confirmed the resident's cetirizine should have been given on the dates identified. 2. A 7/21/23 physician order indicated Resident 20 was prescribed cyanocobalamin (a form of Vitamin B 12) two times a day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary bowel medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#20) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for loose stools and diarrhea. Findings include: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including bladder infection. Review of Resident 20's 8/24/23 through 9/6/23 MAR indicated an 8/24/23 physician order for MiraLAX (a laxative) which was to be administered one time a day for bowel care. The order indicated to hold the medication if Resident 20 had loose stools. The MAR indicated Resident 20 was administered MiraLAX daily and there were no instances when the medication was held. Review of Resident 20's Bowel Elimination Flow Record from 8/24/23 through 9/6/23 indicated Resident 20 had loose stools on the following dates: -8/28, 9/1, 9/2, 9/5 and 9/6. On 9/7/23 at 12:17 PM Staff 3 (LPN-Care Manager) reviewed Resident 20's MiraLAX MAR and Bowel Elimination Flow Record. Staff 3 stated the staff members responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication pass error rate of less than five percent. There were three errors in 26 opportunities resulting in a 11.54% error rate. This placed residents at risk for reduced medication efficacy and adverse medication side effects. Findings include: According to the [NAME] Drug Guide 2023, thyroid medications should be taken on an empty stomach and eating and drinking should be avoided for 30-60 minutes afterwards. Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in 5/2022 with diagnoses including hypothyroidism and diabetes. Resident 28's 9/2023 physician orders included the following: -levothyroxine sodium, (treats low thyroid) 25mcg, give one tablet by mouth one time a day. -Advair Diskus Inhalation Aerosol Powder, (asthma medication) 100-50 mcg/ACT, one puff inhale orally every 12 hours, rinse mouth with water after use. -ziprasidone (antipsychotic) 60mg, give one tablet by mouth twice a day, give with food. On 9/7/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 2 of 3 treatment carts observed during this survey. This placed residents at risk for medication diversion and accidents. Findings include: The facility's Storage of Medications Policy and Procedure dated 8/2018 stated: Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with authorized access. On 9/6/23 at 8:36 AM a treatment cart was observed to be unlocked outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. The nurse was not in view of the cart. Staff 7 (LPN-Care Manager) verified the cart was unlocked. On 9/7/23 at 3:17 PM a treatment cart was observed to be unlocked near room [ROOM NUMBER]. The nurse was not in view of the cart. Staff 8 (Human Resources Manager) walked by and locked the cart. Staff 10 (RN) acknowledged she left the cart unlocked. On 9/8/23 at 9:43 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated it was her expectation the carts remained locked when not in use.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-02-03 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to post accurate and complete staffing information for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents and the public at risk for incomplete and inaccurate staffing information. Findings include: A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports, dated from 1/1/25 through 1/27/25 revealed 17 days when portions of the form were left blank or were inaccurate. The incomplete or inaccurate information included daily census, signatures and the number of working staff. On 1/27/25 at 9:18 AM and 1/28/25 at 8:10 AM the Care Staff Daily Reports were displayed with incorrect information which included shifts not completed or information from the day prior. On 1/30/25 at 9:56 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged many of the reviewed Care Staff Daily Reports were incomplete and the information documented on the reports were inaccurate for the number of staff working on many days.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$22,695 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $18,470 — penalty dated 2026-06-05
- $4,225 — penalty dated 2025-05-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 43 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 43; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| VILLAGE SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| CH VILLAGE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| CZH VILLAGE OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| GEFEN VILLAGE LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| JS VILLAGE LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| MB VILLAGE OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| VILLAGE SNF OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/27/2025 |
| WITZCORP LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| YH VILLAGE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| APFEL, STEPHEN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| HERZ, YEHUDA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| HERZKA, CHAIM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| HERZKA, YISROEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| SPIELMAN, SHIMON | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| STRULOVICS, JOEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| YENOWITZ, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| ODENTHAL, JASON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| COUVE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/27/2025 |
| COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/27/2025 |
| VILLAGE OPCO MANAGER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| VILLAGE SNF CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| MORRIS, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| RUTLEDGE, MARGO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/31/2025 |
| VEACH, DAKOTA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/10/2025 |
| VILLAGE SNF REALTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| VILLAGE SNF REALTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/27/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $646K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385068. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.