La Grande Post Acute Rehab
91 Aries Lane, La Grande, OR 97850 · For profit - Corporation · 76 certified beds · (541) 963-8678 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.9% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 2.0% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.9% | 4.9% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 2.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.6% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.7% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 5.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.4% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.0% | 13.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.8% | 81.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 9.8% | 21.4% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 46.1% | 16.1% | 12.0% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 116 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.7%CMS range 43.9–56.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.2%CMS range 6.0–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 26.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 55.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 88.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.0%CMS range 4.9–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 26.3 residents a day — about 35% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.45 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.98 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.88 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate catheter care and treatment was provided in accordance with professional standards of care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for catheters. This placed residents at risk for improper catheter care. Findings include:Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 11/2025 with diagnosis including indwelling urethral catheter.Resident 3's 11/2/25 Physician Order indicated to change foley catheter every 4 weeks using an 18 French catheter one time a day.Resident 3's 11/11/25 progress notes revealed the following:-At 6:36 PM Staff 13 (RN) charted she changed Resident 3's foley catheter.-At 8:30 PM Resident 3 requested Staff 12 (RN) to flush her/his catheter. -At 10:40 PM Staff 12 rechecked Resident 3 and observed no urine drainage over the past two hours. Resident 3 had consumed over 400 cc of water since 8:30 PM. The current foley catheter was a size 20 French. On 2/3/26 at 2:59 PM, Staff 12 stated when she attempted to adjust Resident 3's catheter at his/her request due to discomfort, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by a resident for 1 of 3 (#1) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: The facility's Investigation of Alleged Sexual Abuse policy, updated 10/2022, defined sexual abuse as non consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident, which included unwanted intimate touching of any kind, especially the breast or perineal area. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 8/2024, with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis. Resident 1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including stroke. Resident 2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. On 2/25/25, the facility submitted a FRI to the State Survey Agency which revealed Resident 2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement the plan of care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for care plans. This placed residents at risk of abuse. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024, with diagnoses including stroke. Resident 2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 2's care plan, revised 2/3/25, indicated she/he had disinhibited sexual behaviors related to touching residents of the opposite gender. Interventions included Resident 2 was to be in line of sight of staff and was not to dine with opposite gender residents. On 4/2/25 at 2:12 PM, Resident 1 stated she/he recalled the incident from 3/25/25. She/he revealed Resident 2 had touched her/his genital area over the clothing on that date. Resident 1 stated Resident 2 was taken away from the dining room by a nurse immediately after the incident. On 4/2/25 at 2:17 PM, Staff 5 (CNA) stated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain hygienic conditions in the facility's walk-in freezer and failed to store food in a hygienic manner in the freezer and dry storage rooms to maintain freshness and prevent the spread of food-borne illness in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food storage. This placed residents at risk of food-borne illness and cross contamination. Findings include: The facility's October 2017 Food Storage policy indicated: -Food storage areas are to be kept clean at all times; -Dry bulk foods are to be stored in seamless plastic or metal bins with tight-fitting lids; and -Items stored in the freezer are to be kept on shelving above the floor. On 2/10/25 at 12:02 PM, during the initial tour of the facility's kitchen, the following was observed in the walk-in freezer: -A discarded frozen snack cup on the floor under the shelving; -A cardboard case of chocolate health shake cartons stored on the floor; -Discarded plastic wrappers scattered on the floor under and between the shelving units; -A plastic-lined…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a system of accurate reconciliation to account for controlled drugs for 1 of 2 sampled medications carts reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation and misplacement of controlled drugs. Findings include: The facility's 1/2023 Storage of Medication and Controlled Medication Storage Policy & Procedure specified the following: - Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration Classifications as controlled substances were subject to special handling, storage, disposal and record keeping. A controlled medication accountability record is prepared when receiving inventory of a schedule 2 medication. At each shift change, a physical inventory of all schedule 2 medication was conducted and was documented on the controlled substances accountability record. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 8/2024 with diagnoses including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (a neurological disorder). Resident 15's 2/2025 Physician Orders did not include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
StaBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were secure for 1 of 1 treatment cart and stored under proper temperatures for 1 of 1 medication refrigerator reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation and reduced medication efficacy. Findings include: The facility's 1/2023 Storage of Medication and Controlled Medication Storage Policy & Procedure specified the following: - Medications and biologicals were stored properly to support safe effective drug administration. - Medications requiring refrigeration or temperatures between 36 degrees F and 46 degrees F were kept in a refrigerator with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring. Do not freeze insulin, if insulin has been frozen, do not use. The CDC's 6/18/24 Storage and Handling of Immunobiologics website, https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-best-practices/storage-handling-immunobiologics.html#cdc_report_pub_study_section_2-storage-temperature, specified vaccines licensed for refrigerator storage should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to inform residents of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication use for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 7 and 10) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for being uniformed of psychotropic medication. Findings include: 1. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with the diagnoses including anxiety. The 5/25/24 Physician Orders revealed an order for Duloxetine (antianxiety) to be administered daily. Resident 10's medical record revealed no evidence of the risk and benefit information for Duloxetine was reviewed with her/him prior to 10/9/24. On 2/13/25 at 11:52 AM, Staff 3 (RN/Divisional Director of Clinical Operations) confirmed Resident 10 was administered Duloxetine from 5/25/24 to 10/9/24. Staff 3 acknowledged Resident 10 was not provided risk and benefit information related to the use of Duloxetine until 10/9/25. Staff 3 stated she would expect the risk and benefit information provided prior to the administration of Duloxetine. 2. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accommodate residents with wheelchair arm rests in safe and proper cleanable order for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#86) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for lack of a clean, safe homelike environment and personal equipment in disrepair. Findings include: On 2/10/25 at 3:28 PM, Resident 86's left wheelchair arm rest was observed with the black surface covering torn and cracked with exposed uncleanable cloth foam. The surface was in disrepair and uncleanable. Record review of the facilities maintenance log dated 12/5/24 to 2/10/25 revealed no reports of Resident 86's or any resident's wheelchair arm rests in poor condition. On 2/11/25 at 12:26 PM Staff 13 (CNA) stated if a resident's wheelchair equipment needed repairs, the staff were to write the concerns in the maintenance log. On 2/11/25 at 1:42 PM, Staff 14 (Maintenance Director) stated staff were to write in the maintenance log when a resident's wheelchair needed repair. Staff 14 confirmed no reports were documented in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow bowel care physician orders for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for constipation care needs. Findings include: The facility's Bowel Protocol Policy, updated 2018, revealed each resident was placed on a daily bowel monitoring program. The licensed nurse reviewed the bowel monitoring daily. If a resident did not have a bowel movement for three days, the nurse was to administer the physician ordered bowel program or the facility specific PRN medication bowel program. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with a diagnoses including pain. Resident 10's 12/1/24 Quarterly MDS indicated she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 10's 1/2025 Physician Orders directed staff to administer the following bowel care medications PRN for constipation: - Senna Oral Tablet; every 24 hours as needed. - Miralax Oral Powder; every 24 hours as needed. - Milk of Magnesia (MOM) Oral Suspension; if resident does not have a bowel movement for three days. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for 1 of 1 facilities reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary and/or prolonged use of antibiotic medications. Findings include: A review of safety with infection control was performed which included a review of the facilities antibiotic stewardship program. There was no indication of the existence of an antibiotic stewardship program. On 2/13/25 at 12:02 PM, 12:51 PM, and 1:11 PM Staff 3 (Divisional Director of Clinical Operations) stated Staff 2 (DNS) was the current Infection Preventionist, but Staff 2 was out of the facility. Staff 3 stated she was unaware of the existance of an antibiotic stewardship program in the facility. Staff 3 stated four current residents received antibiotics but was unable to verify if the residents were being monitored appropriately for the continued use of an antibiotic. Staff 3 stated Staff 2, Staff 9 (Phamacist), the Executive Director, and the Medical Director should be involved in a monthly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a clean, homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for an environment that was not homelike. Findings include: On 10/2/23 between the hours of 12:10 PM and 2:52 PM the following environmental issues were observed: - room [ROOM NUMBER]'s walls had multiple thick gouges where the paint and sheet rock were missing and the plastic window blinds were broken and bent; - room [ROOM NUMBER]'s floor was sticky with built-up dark debris along the baseboard, the walls were scraped and gouged and the vertical blinds had missing slats; - room [ROOM NUMBER]'s large window had multiple strips of black, white and green tape adhered to various parts of the window. Do not open was hand written on one of the green strips of tape. Glue or adhesive residue was observed from top to bottom of the window and blue painter's tape outlined the entire window; - room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure consent was obtained prior to administering psychotropic medications to residents for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for being uninformed about their medications. Findings include: The facility's 9/2017 Informed Consent for Psychotropic Drugs Policy specified when the physician ordered an anti-depressant, the facility obtained informed consent from the resident before the drug was administered. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 2/2021 with diagnoses including depression. Resident 15's 9/30/23 Physician Order indicated the resident was prescribed trazodone 50 mg for sleep and depression. Resident 15's 9/2023 and 10/2023 MARs revealed the resident received trazodone daily. Review of Resident 15's health record revealed no documentation to indicate the resident was informed in advance of the risks and benefits of trazodone nor given the opportunity to consent to the medication. On 10/4/23 at 1:46 PM Staff 3 (Social Services Director)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for self-administration of medications for 1 of 7 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration. Findings include: The facility's 6/2017 Medication Administration Policy specified medications were not to be left at the resident's bedside for the resident to take later. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 3/2020 with diagnoses including heart failure. Resident 10's 9/6/23 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. On 10/5/23 at 8:19 AM Staff 4 (CMA) was observed for medication administration. Staff 4 dispensed the following medications into a plastic cup: - Colace 100mg (stool softener) - furosemide 20mg (diuretic) - losartan 25mg (blood pressure) - gabapentin 100mg (pain) - Jardiance 10mg (diabetes) - Urecholine 10mg (urinary retention) - Eliquis 2.5mg (blood clot prevention) - metformin 500mg (diabetes) - fiber powder, 1 scoop added to a cup of water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment in activites for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#19) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for unidentified care needs. Findings include: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 9/2021 with diagnoses including aphasia (language disorder which affects one's ability to communicate) and dementia. Resident 19's 5/25/23 Annual MDS assessed her/him was unable to answer cognition questions, with memory problems and no recall of information. Section F, Activities Preferences, indicated she/he enjoyed the use of a phone in private, participating in her/his favorite activities and spending time outdoors. The assessment indicated her/his family or representative was not interviewed to obtain answers for the resident. Resident 19's 5/25/23 MDS CAAs for Activities revealed the resident has some cognitive issues that make it difficult for [her/him] to express [her/his] needs. [She/he] seems to have some understanding at times. [She/he] usually just smiles when spoken to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to accurately reflect resident needs for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure. Resident 11's 7/18/23 Significant Change in Status MDS revealed the resident required extensive assistance from at least one staff in the areas of bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Resident 11's 8/16/23 ADL Self-Care Performance Deficit Care Plan revealed the following: - The resident required supervision with bed mobility. - The resident was able to transfer with supervision. - The resident was able to dress her/himself with supervision. - The resident required limited assistance from one staff person with toilet use. - The resident was able to independently perform personal hygiene tasks after set-up. On 10/5/23 at 9:42 AM Staff 9 (CNA) stated she found…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support individual activity interests and preferences for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#19) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for unmet psychosocial needs. Findings include: The facility's 7/2015 Activity Program Policy and Procedure indicated the facility provided an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests as well as physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Activities included individual, small and large group, one-to-one, and independent activities to meet resident's needs, abilities and interests. For residents who remained in their room, the Activity Department provides and assists with in-room activities/projects/leisure pursuits in keeping with needs, abilities, and interests. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 9/2021 with diagnoses including aphasia (language disorder which affects ability to communicate), depression, insomnia (sleeplessness) and dementia. Resident 19's 5/25/23 Annual MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of potential accident hazards for 1 of 3 residents (#22) reviewed for accidents. This placed the residents at risk for potential accidents. Findings include: Resident 22 admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including abnormalities of gait (manner of walking) and mobility, weakness and dementia. Residents 22's 10/2023 Physician Order, initiated on 8/10/23, directed staff to place the resident's bed against the wall on one side. Resident 22's 10/3/23 In-Room Care Plan directed staff to place the resident's bed against the wall on one side and a fall mat on the opposite side. Review of the 10/3/23 IDT (Inter Disciplinary Team) Review form revealed Resident 22 experienced a fall on 9/28/23 in her/his bedroom. The9/28/23 fall assessment indicated the contributing factor of the fall was the resident's lack of safety awareness. Observations on 10/3/23 at 10:16 AM and 10/4/23 at 9:48 AM and 12:56 PM Resident 22 was observed to sit on her/his bed while the bed was positioned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to identify, assess and monitor weight loss for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unidentified weight changes. Findings include: The facility's 12/2016 Procedure for Managing Weight Loss and Weight Gain indicated the following: - Report abnormal results to the Wellness Director or Community Director, Dietician, physician, and the resident's family if the resident is not their own person: a. A 5 percent or more decrease/increase in weight since the last recorded weight or within the past 30 days. b. A 7.5 percent or more decrease/increase in weight since the last recorded weight or within the past 90 days. c. A 10 percent or more decrease/increase in weight since the last recorded weight or within the past 180 days. - Report changes or differences in health status, service needs, or preferences to the Community Director, Wellness Director, Dietician, and/or designated staff. - Once the attending physician has been notified that their resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly maintained and used as ordered for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for discomfort. Findings include: The facility's 1/2015 Maintenance Program-Oxygen Concentrators Policy included the following related to equipment maintenance: - Oxygen tubing, cannula (medical device used to provide supplemental oxygen therapy) and humidifier bottle to be cleaned daily. - Cabinet air filter to be cleaned weekly. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure. Resident 11's 8/16/23 Congestive Heart Failure Care Plan revealed the following: - Oxygen via nasal prongs at two liters as needed to maintain saturation of oxygen over 90 percent and humidified. Resident 11's 8/23/23 Physician Orders included a PRN order for two liters of oxygen per minute via nasal cannula to keep O2 sats greater than 90 percent for hypoxemia. On 10/2/23 at 2:07 PM and 10/3/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure safe and secure storage of medicated powder for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for receiving incorrect medication and treatment. Findings include: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 2/2021 with diagnoses including depression. Resident 15's 9/1/23 Significant Change in Status Assessment revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident 15's 5/2023 Physician Order included nystatin powder (a medication used to treat fungal infections) bid to the groin area. On 10/2/23 at 11:30 AM two unlabeled, plastic medication cups filled with white powder were observed on Resident 15's nightstand. Resident 15 stated staff applied the powder from those cups to her/his groin area every day for her/his rash. On 10/5/23 at 12:39 PM Staff 12 (LPN) stated medicated powders were stored in a locked treatment cart. Staff 12 stated medicated powders, such as nystatin, should be applied by the nurse and not left in a resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices during medication administration for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#s 10, 17, 23 and 131) observed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for spread of infection. Findings include: The facility's 3/2018 Handwashing/Hand Hygiene Policy specified hand hygiene was the primary means to prevent the spread of infection and should be performed before and after preparing medications. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 3/2020 with diagnoses including heart failure. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 8/2021 with diagnoses including stroke. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including lung disease. Resident 131 was admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with diagnoses including heart failure. On 10/4/23 at 11:14 AM Staff 4 (CMA) dispensed and administered Resident 131's medications. At 11:17 AM Staff 4 returned to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0910 — isolatedEnsure resident rooms meet each resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure reisdent rooms were designed and equipped for adequate privacy for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#19) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for lack of priviacy and dignity. Findings include: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 9/2021 with diagnoses including aphasia (language disorder which affects ability to communicate) and dementia. On 10/2/23 at 2:52 PM Resident 19's window blinds were observed with three vertical slats missing and the common area to the soda machines was visible from her/his bed. On 10/3/23 at 11:49 AM the facility's written repair maintenance binder was reviewed and no repair for the missing blinds were reported. On 10/3/23 at 9:38 AM Staff 11 (CNA) stated when Resident 19 received personal care in her/his bed, the blinds covered the window for privacy. On 10/3/23 at 1:50 PM Staff 15 (Administer in Training/Temporary Maintenance) stated the condition of resident rooms and the building in general was audited weekly. At 2:06 PM Staff 15 walked through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-21 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a response rationale for Resident Council requests for 1 of 1 Resident Council reviewed for grievances. This placed residents at risk for a decline in psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Resident Council Notes were reviewed from 8/2022 through 10/2022 and indicated the following concerns: *8/2022: Resident Council meeting canceled due to COVID-19 outbreak. *9/2022: Concerns regarding staff not wearing name tags and making name tags larger so residents could read them. *10/2022: Resident rooms were untidy, cleaning supplies were left piled on dressers, and there were missing pants for one resident and missing pajamas for another resident. There were no written responses or rationales provided for the resident council concerns and the forms for the Resident Council President's signature and Executive Director's signature were left blank. On 10/20/22 at 12:33 PM Staff 3 (Regional [NAME] President) stated there were no written responses for Resident Council concerns.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and notify the physician for delays in treatment for 4 of 7 sampled residents (#s 26, 30, 31 and 32) reviewed for unnecessary medications and following physician orders. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects. Findings include: 1. Resident 32 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypothyroidism (under active thyroid). The resident discharged from the facility on 5/10/22. A 4/28/22 Physician Order indicated the resident was to receive levothyroxine (thyroid medication) once daily. The 4/2022 and 5/2022 MARs indicated Resident 32 did not receive the levothyroxine from 4/28/22 through 5/5/22, except the medication was marked off as given on 5/2/22. The dates reviewed indicated the following: *4/28/22 through 5/1/22: On order from pharmacy *5/2/22: Medication administered. *5/3/22 through 5/4/22: Left blank. *5/5/22: See Progress Note (There was no progress note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a thorough fall investigation and ensure interventions were in place to prevent falls for 4 of 4 falls (Resident #s 12, 34 and 35) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injury. Findings include: 1. Resident 34 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and adult failure to thrive. The 8/28/21 Fall Assessment indicated the resident was at high risk for falls. The 9/3/21 admission MDS indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and the resident's fall history was unable to be determined. A 9/7/21 Fall Investigation indicated Resident 34 was found on the floor laying on the right side with her/his head at the foot of bed. There were no witnesses, and the resident was unable to be interviewed. There was no information related to when the resident was last seen. Resident 34 sustained no injuries. The initial root cause was noted to be related to Resident 34's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was labeled, stored appropriately and was discarded in a timely manner, and a resident refrigerator was properly cleaned and maintained for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitary food storage and handling. This placed residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination. Findings include: 1. On 10/17/22 at 2:20 PM during the initial tour of the facility's walk-in refrigerator, walk-in freezer, and dry storage room the following were observed: Walk-in refrigerator *An unsealed and undated bag of shredded cheese *An unsealed and undated bag of sliced cheese *An unsealed, partially consumed one-gallon container of yellow mustard dated 2/22/22 *An unsealed, partially consumed and undated plastic bottle of teriyaki glaze *An undated zip lock plastic bag of hamburger buns *An unlabeled to go box containing an employee's lunch Walk-in freezer *An undated plastic bag containing five unbaked cinnamon rolls with freezer burn *An undated plastic bag containing frozen egg and cheese omelets with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatment and services to maintain vision abilities were received for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for communication and sensory care. This placed residents at risk for unmet vision needs. Findings include: Resident 5 admitted to the facility in 2/2022 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke). A 5/6/2022 progress note revealed Resident 5 requested an appointment for a vision exam related to complaints of blurred vision. This progress note also stated the request for an appointment was forwarded to social services. The 5/25/22 Quarterly Social Service Evaluation noted vision concerns but did not explain how the facility addressed the resident's needs. On 10/17/22 at 4:47 PM Resident 5 stated she/he was supposed to wear glasses but did not have a pair. Resident 5 said she/he previously expressed this concern to social services. During interviews with Staff 6 (SSD) on 10/18/22 at 2:21 PM and 10/20/22 at 8:45 AM, she stated she usually called to schedule resident appointments on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer wounds were accurately and routinely assessed for healing for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#15) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: The 2019 National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries Quick Reference Guide indicated the following recommendations regarding pressure ulcer assessment: - Assess the pressure ulcer initially and re-assess it at least weekly to monitor progress towards healing; - Document the results of all wound assessments; - Assess and document physical characteristics including: location, category/stage, size, tissue type(s), color, peri-wound condition, wound edges, sinus tracts, undermining, tunneling, exudate, and odor; - Select a uniform, consistent method for measuring wound length, width, depth or wound area to facilitate meaningful comparisons of wound measurements across time; - Ensure pressure ulcers are correctly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly maintained for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 21 and 30) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for infection. Findings include: 1. Resident 21 admitted to the facility in 2022 with hospice services. The Resident's 6/8/22 care plan indicated oxygen therapy with the use of three liters of continuous oxygen. On 10/17/22 at 4:41 PM Resident 21 was observed to have oxygen in place. The oxygen concentrator filter was observed to be dirty, completely covered in dust and the oxygen tubing was not dated. Resident 21 indicated she/he used the oxygen continuously. On 10/18/22 at 11:55 AM Resident 21's oxygen filter was still visibly dusty. Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged the filter was dusty, needed to be cleaned and the resident's oxygen tubing was not dated. 2. Resident 30 admitted to the facility in 3/2020 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A 1/8/21 Physician Order indicated the resident was to receive two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure irregularities identified by the pharmacist were addressed by a physician for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary medications and adverse side effects. Findings include: Resident 5 admitted to the facility in 2/2022 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, depression, and insomnia. A review of Resident 5's 10/2022 MAR revealed she/he received three antidepressants: Cymbalta, Zoloft, and trazodone. Pharmacist recommendations from 3/17/22, 4/21/22, and 7/21/22 documented the need for Resident 5's physician to assess the risks versus benefits of these medications and to provide documentation to support their use. No documentation existed in Resident 5's record indicating these recommendations were acted upon. On 10/19/22 at 3:29 PM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed no rationale was provided for Resident 5's concurrent use of three antidepressants.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain dental services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for dental services. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs. Findings include: Resident 5 admitted to the facility in 2/2022 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke). The 2/23/22 admission Dental CAA explained Resident 5 experienced dental pain and she/he was interested in scheduling a dental appointment. This assessment further indicated social services was notified. A 3/18/22 progress note indicated Resident 5 had a dental appointment scheduled on 3/18/22 but it was not completed as Resident 5 was transferred from the dental office to the emergency department prior to the start of her/his appointment. A 5/6/22 progress note revealed Resident 5 requested to see a dentist related to complaints of dental pain. The progress note indicated the request for an appointment was forwarded to social services. The 5/25/22 Quarterly Social Service Evaluation noted dental concerns but did not explain how the facility addressed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 43 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 43; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| LA GRANDE SNF OPERATIONS, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/13/2025 |
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST 12 LEASED OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| CALIFORNIA AVIV LP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| CH PNW 12 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| COUVE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/13/2025 |
| COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/24/2025 |
| PNW 12 OPCO MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/13/2025 |
| PNW 12 SNF CONSULTING LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/24/2025 |
| WITZCORP PNW 12 LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| HERZKA, YISROEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| YENOWITZ, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| ODENTHAL, JASON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| CHERNOFF, LINDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| LEMMON, TYLER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| MORRIS, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| SPIELMAN, SHIMON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $108K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385211. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.