Mountain View Health And Rehabilitation
201 Koontz Lane, Carson City, NV 89701 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 146 certified beds · (775) 883-3622 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $25,675 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-07)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.3% | 12.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.3% | 1.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 5.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.3% | 2.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.6% | 13.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.1% | 22.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.3% | 89.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 5.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.5% | 15.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 47.3% | 17.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.2% | 23.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.9% | 9.6% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.06 | 1.85 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.58 | 1.45 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
35.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 35.2%CMS range 25.0–50.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 6.3–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 27.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 18.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 10.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.5–14.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 146 beds and averages 132.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to protect residents from physical abuse for 2 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #72 and #104) from resident to resident abuse. Resident #104 obtained a facial fracture resulting in actual harm. Resident #72 obtained lacerations requiring eight staples resulting in actual harm. Findings include: Resident #72 Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and anxiety disorder. Diagnoses added on 10/31/2024, included laceration without foreign body of scalp, subsequent encounter, and unspecified injury of the head, subsequent encounter. A Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Section C (Cognition), documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment was not conducted for Resident #72 due to the resident was rarely and/or never understood. Resident #72's cognitive skills for daily decision making was severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity when staff members discussed another resident's preferences while performing a resident's wound care for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a resident experiencing feelings of diminished self-worth due to staff members engaging in a conversation about another resident, which excluded Resident #2, while providing wound care to the resident.Findings include:Resident #2Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage four and major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified.On 01/14/2026 at 1:14 PM, a surveyor observed a Registered Nurse (RN) performing a dressing change on Resident #2's pressure ulcer with the assistance of a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). The RN and the LPN were standing on either side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation of personal property when the volume of liquid Morphine Sulfate remaining in a medication bottle did not match the facility's narcotic count in a narcotic logbook for 1 of 5 unsampled residents' records reviewed for compliance with medication storage and administration (Resident #24). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident not having an adequate amount of Morphine available to treat the resident's pain.Findings include:Resident #24Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset and low back pain, unspecified.A Physician's Order dated 03/01/2025, documented Morphine Sulfate oral solution 100 milligrams (mg)/ 5 milliliters (ml), give 0.25 ml by mouth every four hours as needed for pain or shortness of breath.On 01/15/2026 at 10:17 AM, during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's policies related to misappropriation of resident property, abuse, and neglect were implemented timely for an allegation of misappropriation of resident property and neglect. This deficient practice resulted in delayed removal of an alleged perpetrator from resident care and access to residents' medications, placing all residents at risk for misappropriation of property and neglect.Findings include:Resident #24Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset and low back pain, unspecified.A Physician's Order dated 03/01/2025, documented Morphine Sulfate oral solution 100 milligrams (mg)/ 5 milliliters (ml), give 0.25 ml by mouth every four hours as needed for pain or shortness of breath.On 01/15/2026 at 10:17 AM, during an inspection of the station 1C medication storage cart, a Licensed Practical Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #74). This deficient practice had the potential to deprive the resident of a person-centered care plan and the associated interventions relative to their current health management needs.Findings include: Resident #74 Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dysphagia following cerebral infarction, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, and epilepsy, unspecified. Resident #74's weight measurements dated 01/13/2025 documented 107.0 pounds, 02/17/2025, 102.0 pounds, and 03/17/2025, 99.0 pounds. A physician progress note dated 02/02/2025, documented dysphagia following cerebral infarction, abnormal weight loss, started on Mirtazapine 7.5 milligrams (mg) at bedtime, weekly weights, monitor oral intake, registered dietitian to follow up. A Clinically Unavoidable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a comprehensive care plan was developed related to a COVID-19 infection for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #108), and 2) a resident's care plan for the care of the resident's pressure ulcer was implemented for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #2). These deficient practices had the potential to result in staff being unaware of resident needs and resident needs going unmet and to result in a resident not receiving the care necessary to prevent the worsening of a chronic wound. Findings include:Resident #108 Resident #108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of acute systolic heart failure. A physician's order, dated 01/11/2026, documented Droplet Precautions were necessary when a patient was infected with a pathogen such as influenza, pertussis, mumps, and respiratory illnesses such as those caused by coronavirus infections every shift for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided pressure ulcer care as ordered by the resident's provider for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a resident's pressure ulcer worsening or developing an avoidable infection.Findings include:Resident #2Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage four and major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified.On 01/12/2026 at 10:41 AM, the resident verbalized the resident had a wound.A Skin Evaluation, dated 01/09/2026, documented the resident had a stage IV pressure ulcer on the resident's coccyx. The wound measurements were 0.9 centimeters (cm) in length, 0.7 cm in width, and had a depth of 0.5 cm.A Physician's Order and the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #2 documented the following:Cleanse coccyx pressure ulcer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate supervision for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #87) when staff failed to verify all residents were present after discovering an open window on a secured memory care unit. This deficient practice resulted in delayed identification of a resident elopement and delayed implementation of the facility's elopement response procedures, with the potential to result in psychosocial and physical harm to the resident including injury or death.Findings include:Resident #87Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition.An initial Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 12/03/2025, documented Resident #87 eloped from the facility.Elopement Risk Evaluations completed on 03/27/2025, 06/26/2025, 09/25/2025, and 10/03/2025 documented Resident #87 was an elopement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, personnel record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 20 sampled employees had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs (Employee #15). This deficient practice had the potential to result in physical and psychosocial harm to the residents in the facility. Findings include:Employee #15 Employee #15 was hired by the facility as a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 12/03/2025. The daily staff schedules documented Employee #15 worked in the 100's unit on 01/10/2026 and 01/11/2026. On 01/15/2026 at 2:44 PM, Human Resources/Payroll (HR) verbalized newly hired nursing staff with prior experience completed a two-week orientation consisting of skills education relating both to on-the-floor and in office experience to ensure staff understood the processes for better continuity of care. A predetermined checklist was populated for all newly hired nurses, and the competencies were evaluated by a member of nursing management. HR explained Employee #15 had over ten years of nursing experience and the employee was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) medications were secured in a locked medication cart and inaccessible to residents, staff and visitors when a Registered Nurse (RN) left two bottles of medication on top of a medication cart when the cart was not within sight of the RN and 2) outdated medications were removed from 1 of 4 medication carts inspected for medication storage. This deficient practice had the potential for residents, visitors, and unauthorized staff to have access to medications and outdated medications with diminished efficacy to be administered to residents.Findings include:Unsecured medicationsOn [DATE] at 8:37 AM, an RN was in the 100 hall and began preparing medications for administration to a resident. The RN placed a bottle of Sodium Bicarbonate and a bottle of Vitamin D3 on top of the medication cart.On [DATE] at 8:43 AM, the RN locked the medication cart and entered the resident's room. The medication cart was in the hallway, not within sight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to complete a Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the monitoring of side effects of an anticoagulant medication, the monitoring of a Foley catheter, and the monitoring of enhanced barrier precautions, for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #14). This deficient practice had the potential to inaccurately reflect the prescribed monitoring of care and the associated interventions relative to the resident's current health management needs.Findings include: Resident #14 Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified atrial fibrillation, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, and other obstructive and reflux uropathy. A physician's order dated 10/01/2025, documented Apixaban oral tablet, 5 milligrams (mg), give one tablet by mouth two times a day for atrial fibrillation. Resident #14's Medication Administration Record dated January 2025, documented Apixaban oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) staff wore appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when entering the rooms of 2 of 14 coronavirus (COVID-19) positive residents (Residents #108 and #58) and 2) enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were appropriately implemented and a staff member performed hand hygiene appropriately when performing wound care for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #2). The deficient practice had the potential to spread infectious illnesses to vulnerable residents in the facility and result in a resident developing an infection from a staff member's lack of hand hygiene or failure to follow appropriate EBP. Findings include:Resident #108 Resident #108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of acute systolic heart failure. A physician's order, dated 01/11/2026, documented Droplet Precautions were necessary when a patient infected with a pathogen such as influenza,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a staff member received screening and education on the Sars Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine for 1 of 1 staff sampled for COVID-19 vaccine review. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a staff member not having the opportunity to receive the vaccine or education on the risks and benefits of the vaccine.Findings include:Employee #23Employee #23 was hired as a Registered Nurse (RN) with a start date of 08/31/2023.On 01/15/2025 at 9:55 AM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) verbalized the facility did not have any documentation of education or screening provided to the RN and confirmed the RN had not been screened for eligibility to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.The IP verbalized the facility referred to the federal regulation as the facility policy for screening and educating staff on the COVID-19 vaccine.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolatedProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure initial behavioral health care training, related to dementia, was completed timely for 2 of 20 sampled employees (Employee #9 and #10). This deficient practice had the potential to prevent residents with dementia care needs from attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings include:Employee #9Employee #9 was hired as a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 06/16/2025.Employee #9's personnel record documented initial behavioral health care training for dementia completed on 11/01/2025.Employee #10Employee #10 was hired as a Speech Language Pathologist on 06/27/2025.Employee #10's personnel record documented initial behavioral health care training for dementia completed on 10/30/2025.On 01/15/2026 at 9:50 AM, Human Resources/Payroll explained all employees, contracted employees, and agency staff were to complete behavioral health training related to dementia within the first 30 days of hire and annually thereafter. The Human…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the on-call medical provider after a resident experienced a fall with injury, resulting in bruising to the forehead for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed identification and treatment of serious complications, including intracranial bleeding, for a resident receiving anticoagulation therapy.Findings include: Resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, subsequent encounter, muscle weakness, generalized, difficulty in walking, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic combined systolic congestive and diastolic congestive heart failure, and long-term and current use of anticoagulants. Resident #2's Care Plan dated 11/11/2021 and updated 08/30/2025, documented the resident was receiving an anticoagulant related to atrial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure initial elder abuse prevention training was completed timely for 1 of 10 sampled employees (Employee #8). This deficient practice had the potential to place all residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings include:Employee #8Employee #8 was hired as a Certified Nursing Assistant on 11/01/2025.Employee #8's personnel record lacked documented evidence elder abuse prevention training was completed upon hire.On 11/25/2025 at 2:36 PM, the Administrator verbalized abuse training was to be completed within the first orientation. Staff were not permitted to work on the floor prior to the completion of abuse training. All staff were required to complete abuse training. The Administrator confirmed Employee #8 lacked timely elder abuse training.The facility policy titled Abuse Training, updated 10/2022, documented facility staff, contract staff and routine volunteers were trained on abuse prevention, reporting, and intervention upon hire, annually and periodically thereafter in accordance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident with wandering behaviors from elopement from the facility for 1 of 16 sampled residents (Resident #13). The deficient practice had the potential for physical and psychosocial harm to the resident. Findings include: Resident #13 Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including memory deficit following other cerebrovascular disease, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, and cognitive communication deficit. Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 03/04/2025, documented Resident #13 had a history of wandering, had verbalized the desire to leave the facility, and was seeking out family members placing the resident at significant risk of an unsafe situation related to the resident's diagnosis of dementia with behaviors. Care Plan dated 03/06/2025, documented Resident #13 was an elopement risk, wandered aimlessly related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a medication cart containing resident medications was secure, 2) an open multi-dose vial had the date opened and initials of the first person to use the vial written on it in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms reviewed and 3) outdated medications were removed from 3 of 3 medication carts reviewed and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms reviewed. The deficient practice could have facilitated unauthorized access to medications in the cart and had the potential for outdated/expired medications to be administered to residents. Findings include: Unsecured Medications On 11/07/2024 at 9:14 AM, the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) verbalized medication carts should be secure when not in use. On 11/07/2024 at 10:24 AM, an unattended medication cart in the 100 hall was unlocked. A resident was standing next to the unlocked medication cart. On 11/07/2024 at 10:27 AM, a Registered Nurse (RN) returned to the unsecured medication cart and confirmed the medication cart was unlocked. The RN confirmed a resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered with an error rate of less than five percent (%). There were 26 opportunities and 14 medication errors. The medication error rate was 53.85%. Findings include: Resident #4 Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. On 11/07/2024 at 8:07 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) began preparing to administer medications to Resident #4. Among the medications prepared were the following: -Cholecalciferol (Vitamin D) 1000 units, two tablets. -Loratadine 10 milligrams (mg), one tablet. -Fish Oil 1000 mg, one capsule. -Multivitamin, one tablet. -Fluticasone 50 micrograms (mcg) per spray. -Vitamin B1 (Thiamine) 100 mg, one tablet. -Lisinopril 10 mg, one tablet. On 11/07/2024 at 8:15 AM, the LPN administered the prepared medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to self determination was respected when the facility failed to inform a new Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) of the resident's wishes not to be disturbed for care during the night. The CNA continued to attempt to turn the resident after the resident had asked the CNA to stop, resulting in bruising to the resident's thigh for 1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #23). Findings include: Resident #23 Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including other specified arthritis, unspecified site, essential primary hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An initial Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted to the State Agency (SA) on 10/29/2024, documented Resident #23 complained of being provided rough care by a CNA on 10/26/2024. The CNA was identified, and the date of the incident was determined to be 10/27/2024. Resident #23's Comprehensive Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable, homelike environment when staff were reported as being loud and disruptive to a resident's sleep during the night shift for 1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #112). Findings include: Resident #112 Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including generalized anxiety disorder and insomnia, unspecified. On 11/04/2024 at 2:03 PM, Resident #112 verbalized the resident was concerned about staff waking the resident up in the middle of the night. Resident #112 explained night shift staff were loud, and the resident often heard staff talking in the hallway about staff's personal lives and other residents' care. The resident had been offered to move rooms as the resident was previously near the nurses' station however the resident reported the noise level on the night shift had not improved since the resident moved to another room. The resident verbalized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment for 1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #27). This deficient practice had the potential to deprive the resident of a person-centered care plan relative to their current health management needs. Findings include: Resident #27 Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of other low back pain. Resident #27's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], section J1900 (Health Conditions-Number of Falls Since Prior Assessment) documented Resident #27 had two falls with no injury, one fall with injury, and two falls with major injury since the last assessment. Resident #27's progress notes documented the resident fell once on 09/14/2024 but lacked documented evidence any other falls occurred in 2024. On 11/07/2024 at 12:01 PM, the MDS Coordinator Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)verbalized using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review the facility failed to provide showers for 1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #108). The deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the resident's overall well-being. Findings include: Resident #108 Resident #108 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, cervical region, chronic pain syndrome, and difficulty in walking. On 11/04/2024 at 4:07 PM, Resident #108 verbalized the resident did not get showers or bed baths. Resident #108's Comprehensive Care Plan dated 09/09/2024, documented shower two times weekly. On 11/06/2024 at 2:11 PM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)/Shower Aid verbalized residents should receive two showers a week, but the CNA was aware the Resident #108 preferred showers more often. Resident #108 only received showers once a week, although the resident's preference was three times a week. The resident did not refuse showers when offered. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a resident's significant surgical wounds were evaluated weekly for 1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #67), 2) a resident's change in condition was reported timely to a physician for 2 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #36 and #62) and 3) ensure a resident's blood sugar levels were checked according to a physician's order for 1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #52). The deficient practices had the potential to result in 1) overlooked skin integrity decline, 2) a change in condition going unmonitored, placing residents at risk for infection to spread and for poor clinical outcomes, and 3) a resident experiencing hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar) or hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) without adequate monitoring and intervention. Findings include: Wound Evaluations Resident #67 Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of unspecified open wound of abdominal wall, unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered according to a physician's order for 1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #80). This deficient practice had the potential to cause worsening of the resident's diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Findings include: Resident #80 Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified bacterial pneumonia, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation. On 11/04/2024 at 8:44 AM, Resident #80 was lying in bed and receiving Oxygen via nasal cannula (NC). The resident's Oxygen concentrator was set at three liters per minute (LPM). Resident #80 verbalized Resident #80 wore Oxygen continuously and was supposed to be receiving two LPM. On 11/05/2024 at 4:04 PM, Resident #80 was lying in bed and receiving Oxygen via NC. The resident's Oxygen concentrator was set at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to identify triggers for a resident diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for 1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #52). This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for re-traumatization. Findings include: Resident #52 Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic and paranoid schizophrenia. Resident #52's Care Plan documented Resident #52 was at risk for feelings of trauma or re-traumatization due to a diagnosis of PTSD. Goals included Resident #52 would be free of feelings of trauma or re-traumatization and would be safe and supported. Interventions included assisting Resident #52 with obtaining mental health or other services to support the resident as indicated and displaying warmth, compassion, and non-judgmental approach. On 11/06/2024 at 11:30 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) verbalized residents' behaviors were monitored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) resident information was not visible on an unattended computer screen, and 2) records were accurate for 1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #62). Findings include: On 11/03/2024 at 12:24 PM, a computer screen on an unattended medication cart in the 100 hall displayed resident information. On 11/03/2024 at 12:25 PM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) returned to the medication cart and verbalized the computer screen should not display resident information. The LPN confirmed the computer screen was unlocked and unattended with resident information on display. On 11/06/2024 at 4:35 PM, a computer screen on an unattended medication cart in the 100 hall displayed resident information. On 11/06/2024 at 4:36 PM, a Registered Nurse (RN) returned to the cart and verbalized computer screens should be locked when not attended and confirmed the computer screen displayed resident medical records. On 11/07/2024 at 9:14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure ordered Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented for a resident with chronic pressure ulcers for 1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #60). The deficient practice had the potential for spreading infectious illnesses to the vulnerable resident. Findings include: Resident #60 Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia and pressure ulcer of right heel, stage three. A physician's order dated 02/20/2024, documented Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) every shift for wounds. Resident #60's care plan revised 10/30/2024, documented a potential and actual impairment to skin integrity to include a healing stage three pressure ulcer to right heel. An intervention documented EBP due to wounds. On 11/03/2024 at 10:45 AM, EBP signage was not posted at the entrance of Resident #60's room. On 11/07/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (Resident #392) reviewed for vaccinations, including influenza vaccines (Resident #392) was adminitstered the vaccine after the resident's guardian had consented for the vaccine to be administered. The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for not being protected against serious illness. Findings include: Resident #392 Resident #392 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes mellitus, and adult failure to thrive. Resident #392's State Immunization Record documented the resident last received an influenza vaccine on 12/27/2023. Resident #392's clinical record included a Resident Multi-Vaccine Consent Form. The form was signed and dated by the resident's guardian on 10/29/2024, giving consent for the resident to receive an influenza vaccine. The form documented the resident was eligible to recieve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to accurately document the amount of a controlled substance in 2 of 2 sampled controlled substance logs and failed to ensure the discrepancies were reported to the Director of Nursing (DON). Findings include: On 11/14/23 at 2:03 PM, a controlled substance reconciliation count was completed for the 300 hall medication cart's controlled substance log with the DON and the following inaccuracies were identified. The controlled substance log documented the following: -On 11/09/23 at 8:00 AM, a 0.25 milliliter (ml) dose of morphine sulfate concentrate (morphine) was documented as administered, and 4.0 ml of the medication remained in the bottle. -On 11/09/23 at 8:00 PM, a 0.25 ml dose of morphine was documented as administered and the remaining amount was documented as 3.5 ml and should have been documented as 3.75 ml. -On 11/13/23 at 8:00 PM, documented 1.5 ml of morphine remained in the bottle. There were no additional entries in the log. A 0.25 ml dose of morphine was documented as given twice daily on 11/10,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure staffing in the 300 hall memory care was sufficient to ensure timely administration of medications resulting in the failure to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%) and the facility did not experience excessively low weekend staffing. Findings include: Timely Administration of Medications On 11/16/23 between 9:05 AM and 9:46 AM, during observation of the 300 hall memory care unit's medication administration pass, a Registered Nurse (RN) administering medications, prepared resident medications in the enclosed nurse's station to ensure resident safety. The RN explained due to the residents' cognitive deficits items on top of the medication administration cart, such as pitchers of water, juice, and pudding put the residents at increased risk of harm related to falls. There was not another staff member present at the nurse's station to assist the RN when residents came to the nurse's station for assistance. The RN had to make frequent delays in the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure medication was administered with an error rate of less than 5 percent (%). There were 25 opportunities and 14 medication errors. The medication error rate was 56.0 %. Findings include: Resident #60 Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. Resident #60's Order Summary Report documented the following physician's order: -Olanzapine oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg), give 5 mg by mouth one time a day for schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. Resident #60's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November 2023, documented the following medication was due each morning at 8:00 AM: -Olanzapine 5 mg tablet. On 11/15/23 at 9:05 AM, a Registered Nurse (RN) began preparing Resident #60's morning medication for administration to the resident. On 11/15/23 at 9:09 AM, the RN entered Resident #60's room to administer the resident's morning dose of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident physical abuse for 1 of 12 Facility Reported Incidents (FRI) (Resident #5). Findings include: A FRI final report, dated 10/27/23, documented on 10/25/23, Resident #115 had punched Resident #5 in the stomach when attempting to exit the common room. Resident #5 Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia and major depressive disorder. Resident #115 Resident #115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including psychotic disorder with delusions, unspecified mood disorder and unspecified psychosis. Resident #5's Interdisciplinary Note dated 10/26/23, documented on 10/25/23, Resident #5 was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) notified the nurse, Resident #5 was witnessed getting hit by Resident #115 with a closed fist when Resident #115…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to document an investigation of alleged abuse for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #114). Findings include: Resident #114 Resident #114 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features. On 11/13/23 at 3:15 PM, Resident #114 verbalized a facility staff member had thrown water on the resident a couple of days prior. Resident #114 verbalized they threw the water back at the staff member and had been frustrated due to waiting 45 minutes for a response to the call light. The resident recalled the staff member was not a nurse. On 11/14/23 at 9:54 AM, Resident #114 recalled telling a nurse on the day of the incident about the staff member throwing water at them but did not file a grievance. On 11/15/23 at 4:09 PM, a Registered Nurse (RN) verbalized if a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #114). Findings include: Resident #114 Resident #114 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features. On 11/13/23 at 3:24 PM, Resident #114 verbalized their dentures were broken the second day in the facility. The resident recalled the facility informed them a dental appointment would be made but no one had followed up. A Care Conference note dated 08/08/23, documented the resident had upper and lower dentures in need of repair. A Social Service admission and History Evaluation note dated 08/08/23, documented the resident had broken dentures - (upper and bottom) dental to follow. Resident #114's MDS Sectiom L0200 Oral/Dental Status, dated 08/14/23, lacked documentation the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident requiring assistance with nail care had the need care planned and a resident's care planned interventions for chronic pain were implemented for 2 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #29 and #16). Findings include: Resident #29 Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, unspecified, contracture, left hand, and muscle weakness (generalized). On 11/13/23 at 8:46 AM, the resident was sitting on the side of the resident's bed and was not wearing shoes or socks. The resident's toenails were very overgrown. The resident's clinical record lacked documentation of a care plan to address the resident's need for assistance with nail care. On 11/15/23 at 10:19 AM, Resident #29 was standing at the nurse's station. The resident had no shoes or socks on, and the resident's toenails appeared long, thick, and yellowed. On 11/15/23 at 10:41 AM, the Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to offer a non-English speaking resident translation services as care planned for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #97). Findings include: Resident #97 Resident #97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia unspecified, and adult failure to thrive. Resident #97's Comprehensive Care Plan documented Resident #97 had a communication problem related to a language barrier as Resident #97 speaks Spanish and interventions included use of a language (phone) line. On 11/15/23 at 10:07 AM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) verbalized there were two residents who were Spanish speaking only. The CNA explained there was always a staff member on the hall who speaks Spanish. The CNA verbalized sometimes having to provide translation with assessments for the nurses. The CNA confirmed not using the translation service as the CNA was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident requiring assistance with nail care was provided with care to prevent the resident's toe nails from becoming overgrown for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #29). Findings include: Resident #29 Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, unspecified, contracture, left hand, and muscle weakness (generalized). On 11/13/23 at 8:46 AM, the resident was sitting on the side of the resident's bed and was not wearing shoes or socks. The resident's toenails were very overgrown. The resident's clinical record lacked documentation of an assessment of the resident's nails or a care plan to address the resident's need for assistance with nail care. On 11/15/23 at 10:19 AM, Resident #29 was standing at the nurse's station. The resident had no shoes or socks on, and the resident's toenails appeared long, thick, and yellowed. On 11/15/23 at 10:41 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, personnel record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) with First Aid training was completed for 1 of 5 sampled Licensed Nurses (Employee #2). Findings include: Employee #2 Employee #2 was hired on [DATE], as the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON's personnel record documented evidence of CPR with First Aid training was last completed on [DATE], and had expired [DATE]. The DON's personnel record lacked documented evidence of CPR with First Aid training for [DATE]. On [DATE] at 10:52 AM, the Human Resources Manager verbalized CPR was required to be taken by all licensed nurses upon hire and again upon the expiration date. The facility policy titled Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), last updated 09/2017, documented all licensed nurses employed by the center were required to have current CPR certification.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of a pressure ulcer and determined to be at risk for the development of a pressure ulcer received wound care per physician and the facility policy for 2 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #64 and #54). Findings include: Resident #64 Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, subsequent encounter, pressure ulcer of left heel, unstageable, pressure ulcer of other site, stage two, pressure ulcer of right hip, stage three, and pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage four. A Weekly Skin Evaluations dated 10/25/23, documented three different pressure ulcers. An unstageable pressure ulcer on the left heel, a stage two pressure ulcer on the left outer ankle, and a stage four pressure ulcer on the sacrum. A care plan for Resident #64, initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a bed was in the low position per physician's orders and followed after a resident was identified as a high risk for falls and had a history of actual falls, in an attempt to prevent future falls for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings include: Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including other sequalae of other cerebrovascular disease, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions and vascular dementia, severe, with psychotic disturbance. On 11/13/23 at 9:41 AM, Resident #1 was sleeping in bed and the bed was in the highest position. A Care Plan initiated on 01/19/21, and revised on 09/20/22, documented the resident was at risk for falls related to confusion, gait and balance problems, incontinence, psychoactive drug use, unaware of safety needs and wondering. The resident's last actual fall was documented on 09/20/22. Fall interventions included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an attempt was made to schedule a timely follow up appointment with a Urologist for a resident with a urinary catheter for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #113). Findings include: Resident #113 Resident #113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including overactive bladder, unspecified urinary incontinence, and major depressive disorder, single episode, unspecified. On 11/13/23 at 8:43 AM, Resident #113 was sitting up on the side of the resident's bed. The resident held up the resident's catheter bag and became tearful. The resident asked if the resident could take it out. On 11/13/23 at 10:10 AM, the representative for Resident #113 verbalized the resident had gone to the Emergency Department (ED) and had the catheter inserted for a blockage. The representative verbalized the facility was supposed to schedule an appointment with a Urologist for Resident #113 to determine the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was medicated for pain prior to procedures as care planned for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #16). Findings include: Resident #16 Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage four, diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, subsequent encounter, and major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. On 11/13/23 at 9:10 AM, the resident verbalized the resident had a wound on the resident's back and the dressing changes frequently caused the resident pain. A care plan for Resident #16, revised 09/20/23, documented the resident had chronic pain and received Tylenol as needed. Analgesia would be administered one half hour before treatments or care. An Order Summary Report for Resident #16 documented the following: - acetaminophen (Tylenol) suppository 650…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review the facility failed to ensure an informed consent was obtained prior to installation of grab bars for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #69). Findings include: Resident #69 Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including other specified fracture of right pubis, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, subsequent encounter, unspecified dementia, mild, without behavioral disturbance, and muscle weakness (generalized). On 11/14/23 at 7:57 AM, Resident #69's bed had grab bars on both sides. A Device Informed Consent, dated 07/12/23, documented the resident was informed of the risks and benefits of right-side grab bar use and device did not restrict movement. A bed rail evaluation dated 08/17/23, documented bilateral grab bars were recommended. Resident #69's care plan documented the resident was at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to obtain informed consent prior to administration of a psychotropic medication, ensure psychotropic medications were ordered and administered to treat a specific, diagnosed condition for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #54) and ensure a resident on a psychotropic medication had a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #22). Findings include: Resident #54 Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including aftercare following joint replacement surgery, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, unspecified dementia, mild, with other behavioral disturbance, and Alzheimer's disease, unspecified. Resident #54's Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented: - Start date of 04/18/23, hydroxyzine hydrochloride (HCl) Oral Tablet 25 milligrams (mg) (Hydroxyzine HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed for Agitation - Getting out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a dental consult was scheduled for damaged dentures for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #114). Findings include: Resident #114 Resident #114 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features. On 11/13/23 at 3:24 PM, Resident #114 verbalized their dentures had broke the second day in the facility. The resident recalled the facility informed them a dental appointment would be made but no one had followed up with the resident. A Care Conference note dated 08/08/23, documented the resident had upper and lower dentures in need of repair. A Social Service admission and History Evaluation note dated 08/08/23, documented the resident had broken dentures - (upper and bottom) dental to follow. Resident #114's care plan reflected resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to provide meals based on resident's allergies for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #3). Findings include: Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted [DATE], with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, generalized anxiety disorder and metabolic encephalopathy. The diagnosis of celiac disease was added on 10/20/23. Food Preferences Record, dated 04/17/23, lacked documented evidence of celiac disease for Resident #3. Resident #3's behavioral health solutions psych progress notes from 04/25/23 to 09/25/23 documented Resident #3's gluten allergy. On 11/15/23 at 2:38 PM, the Registered Dietician (RD) explained all nutritional assessments were completed by the RD. The RD confirmed the facility was not aware of a gluten allergy prior to Resident #3's re-admission on [DATE]. On 11/15/23 at 4:16 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verbalized medical records was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions (TBP) were initiated and discontinued per facility policy and staff were able to explain the reason a resident was on TBP for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #31). Findings include: Resident #31 Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including non-ST elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarction, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, and personal history of COVID-19. On the mornings of [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE], a sign was posted on the outside of the resident's door documenting the following: - Contact Precautions (in addition to Standard Precautions). Visitors: Report to nurse before entering. An order dated [DATE], documented droplet precautions were necessary when a patient infected with a pathogen, such as influenza, pertussis, mumps, and respiratory illnesses, such as those caused by coronavirus infections. (Extended spectrum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse for 7 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #15, #16, #17, #19, #21, #22, and #28), and failed to prevent employee to resident neglect for 1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #13). Findings include: A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) final report, dated 05/01/23, documented on 04/24/23, Resident #13 had an unwitnessed fall resulting in a fractured left hip. Resident #13 was not assessed by a nurse or given medical attention until 04/26/23 due to a Hospitality Aide and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) not reporting the fall. Resident #13 Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including low back pain, unspecified; age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture; unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety; muscle weakness (Generalized); unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure post fall interventions were implemented and followed after a fall in an attempt to prevent future falls for1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #8). Findings include: Resident #8 Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, subsequent encounter, epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status epilepticus, anoxic brain damage, not elsewhere classified, and conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions. On 05/30/23 at 9:30 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) explained residents who were identified as a fall risk would have fall interventions put in place in an attempt to prevent injuries if a resident had fallen. The interventions could include fall mats on each side of the resident's bed and the resident would be under close supervision to ensure all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Nurse provided care for a resident post fall when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Hospitality Aide did not notify a Licensed Nurse of a resident's fall to complete an assessment of the resident for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #13). Findings include: A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) final report, dated 05/01/23, documented on 04/24/23, Resident #13 had an unwitnessed fall resulting in a fractured left hip. Resident #13 was not assessed by a nurse or given medical attention until 04/26/23 due to a Hospitality Aide and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) not reporting the fall. Resident #13 Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including low back pain, unspecified; age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture; unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety; muscle weakness (Generalized);…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-11-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed or updated for a lunch service. Findings include: On 11/14/23 at 3:00 PM, during the Resident Council Interview, residents complained food changes to the menu occurred often. The menu was frequently not posted at Station 1 and if it was posted, it did not always match the menu served. The residents verbalized the concern with not posting accurate menus resulted in residents not knowing if they wanted an alternate meal. A resident could request the alternate if they did not want what was served but then they have to wait for their meal and could be more than 45 minutes. On occasion, the alternate requested, was forgotten and the resident would have to wait for the next meal. On 11/15/23 at 11:41 AM, residents were served honey mustard pork loin, au gratin potatoes, savory cabbage, and apple pie. The dining room menu posted documented lunch on 11/15/23, was to be honey mustard pork loin, au gratin potatoes, savory cabbage, and cream cheese cherry square. On 11/15/23 at 3:38 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$25,675 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $25,675 — penalty dated 2024-11-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 43 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 43; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST 12 LEASED OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| CH PNW 12 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| WITZCORP PNW 12 LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| HERZKA, YISROEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| YENOWITZ, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| EARL, STEVEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| RIKER, MICHELLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| COUVE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/16/2025 |
| COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/16/2025 |
| PNW 12 OPCO MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/16/2025 |
| PNW 12 SNF CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/16/2025 |
| CUBACUB, CELIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| RASMUSSON, TARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| ROJAS, ALELI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| SPIELMAN, SHIMON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $220K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nevada Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295079. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.