No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Canterbury House

502 29th Street Southeast, Auburn, WA 98002 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (253) 939-0090 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (253) 939-0090 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Dec 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$68,159 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $68,159 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-02)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1811 Howard Rd Ste 101 · (877) 522-1275 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1701 Auburn Way S · (253) 394-0029 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
506 21st St SE · (253) 754-1149 · Call to confirm hours
Park
25TH St SE · (253) 931-3000 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.5%14.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms26.1%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.1%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.0%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.5%93.8%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.4%22.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.8%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine44.1%82.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.9%19.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.1%13.4%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 142 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.8%CMS range 41.9–62.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 7.7–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified81.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting81.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge91.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.9–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.791.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.70
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.26
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.51
RN hoursweekends
35.8%
Total nursing turnover
58.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 85.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-16)
29
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently assess and monitor change in condition and implement provider orders timely for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 16) reviewed for significant injury of unknown origin. Resident 16 experienced harm when there was a delay in assessment and treatment by a medical professional and the resident required surgical intervention for a large, expanding hematoma to their right calf, and a blood transfusion for a critically low blood count. These failures placed all residents at risk for delay in treatment, worsening of condition, unmet care needs, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Skin Integrity, revised October 2022, nursing staff would complete a full body skin assessment weekly. The policy showed when a skin impairment was identified after admission, the facility would place the resident on alert charting for the skin impairment. The policy showed staff would document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-02-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling urinary catheters (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra (an opening that allows urine to leave the body) that drains urine into a bag) were provided catheter care consistent with standards of practice for indwelling catheters, consistent documentation of catheter procedures and resident response, and coordinated referrals to a urologist for evaluation as ordered by a physician for 5 of 5 residents (Resident 3, 2, 1, 4 & 5) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. Resident 3 experienced harm when they had redness, swelling, and skin breakdown around the urethra due to catheter friction wear that required a surgical procedure to facilitate urinary function through a tube inserted in the lower abdomen. This placed all residents with urinary catheters at risk for urinary tract infections, decreased bladder tone (muscle strength), urethral erosion (gradual destruction of the tissues),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in accordance with professional standards of safety for 1 of 1 facility kitchens reviewed. The failure to ensure the kitchen's range vent hood and freezer were kept clean and free of dust, debris, and/or dirt build-up placed residents at risk for ingesting contaminated food and the development of foodborne illness. Findings included <Facility Policy>The facility policy titled, Sanitary Conditions: Equipment and Utensil Cleaning and Sanitization, published 01/2008, showed a potential cause of foodborne outbreaks was improper cleaning of contaminated equipment. The policy showed protecting equipment from contamination including dust and grease was indicated.The facility policy titled, Food Storage, updated 10/2017, showed the facility would ensure food storage areas/environment were kept clean, safe, and sanitary at all times. <Range Vent Hood>Observation on 01/12/2026 at 8:39 AM showed the kitchen's range vent hood had a visible buildup of dust and dirt. There were spider…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment (a dishwasher) was kept in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 facility kitchens reviewed. These failures placed the residents at risk for infection from using improperly sanitized dishes and utensils during meals and the development of foodborne illness. Findings included.<Facility Policy>The facility policy titled, Sanitary Conditions: Equipment and Utensil Cleaning and Sanitization, published 01/2008, showed dishwashing machines were operated according to the manufacturer specifications. The policy showed, for Low Temperature Dishwashers, chemical sanitization included a wash cycle at 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and a final rinse with 50 parts per million (PPM) Chlorine (the chemical component used to test for proper sanitation) concentration on the dish surface.< Manufacturer's Instructions - Dishwasher> According to the 12/17/2010 Ecolab Installation and Operation manual provided by the facility, the safe operating temperature specified for this dishwasher was 120F (minimum) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility: (1) failed to provide the resident and/or the representative a written notice of the facility's bed hold (a process to reserve a resident's current bed when was temporarily absent) policy, at the time of transfer/discharge or within 24 hours, and document in the resident's records for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 9, 27, & 82); and (2) failed to ensure appropriate information was communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider and document in the resident's records for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 9 & 27) reviewed for hospitalizations. These failures placed residents and their representatives at risk of not being informed of their right to, or the cost of ensuring their bed was held for them while hospitalized and unsafe and ineffective transition of care. Findings included . <Policy>The facility policy titled, Bed Hold, updated 05/2025, showed the resident and/or resident representative should be informed of the facility's bed hold policy in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure: physician orders were followed for 4 of 18 sampled residents (Residents 55, 1, 9, & 27), failed to notify the physician for refusals of medications for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 27) whose medication regimens were reviewed. These failures left residents at risk for unmet care needs and other negative health outcomes.Findings included .Facility PolicyAccording to the facility's 2007 Non-Controlled Medication Orders policy, staff were to administer medications in accordance with prescribers' written orders and, if necessary, staff would contact the prescriber for clarification. Staff were to document all interactions and the resulting order clarification in the nursing progress notes and elsewhere in the medical record.<Following Orders> <Resident 55> According to the 11/06/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 55 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including orthopedic (bone/muscle) conditions. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (Residents 5, 9, & 74) reviewed for Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) services received the care and services they were assessed to require. The failure to provide hand splinting (Resident 5), Range of Motion (ROM) exercises (Resident 9), and grooming/dressing program (Resident 74) placed residents at risk for pain, contractures (the permanent or severe tightening of muscles resulting to immovable joints), decline in mobility, increased dependence on staff, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy>The facility's undated policy titled, Contracture Management, an addendum to ROM from the Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA) Training Program, showed the nursing team screened, assessed, and tracked in regular intervals changes in joint mobility in all residents with evidence of limited ROM, and plan a RNP as needed. The policy showed RNAs had an active role in screening and monitoring residents for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure effective coordination of care between the facility and hospice staff and failed to implement and develop a coordinated Care Plan (CP) for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 5 & 3) reviewed for hospice services. The failure to implement a system by which consistent communication between the facility and hospice staff occurred placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary care and services, avoidable discomfort, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's updated September 2017 Hospice Provision of Care Policy, the facility would collaborate with outside providers to coordinate the provision of hospice care as directed by each residents' physician. The hospice and facility would agree upon a coordinated Care Plan (CP) to include directives and services hospice care which the facility would be responsible for. The CP was to be updated quarterly and as needed and would indicate each party's responsibilities. The unit manager would coordinate care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: ensure staff used appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - disposable barriers such as gloves and gowns used to prevent exposure to infectious materials) for 1 supplemental resident (Resident 55) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms); ensure staff followed Transmission Based Precautions (TBP - a set of infection control practices used to prevent the spread of infectious agents, in addition to standard precautions) for 1 supplemental resident (Resident 88) reviewed for TBP; and ensure respiratory equipment was free from visible debris for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 27) reviewed for respiratory care. These failures placed residents and staff at risk for exposure to and development of contagious, communicable infectious diseases.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's March 2025 TBP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a system to ensure 2 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) reviewed for training (Staff H,CNA & Staff I, CNA), received the required in-service training of no less than 12 hours per year. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from unqualified staff.Findings included.In an interview on 01/14/2026 at 12:44 PM, Staff J (Licensed Practical Nurse, Minimum Data Set) said CNAs should complete 12 hours of in-service training each year by the anniversary of their date of hire.<Staff H>Review of staff listing provided on 01/12/2026 showed the facility hired Staff H on 11/07/2019.Review of the training records provided for Staff H's last completed year of employment from 11/07/2024 through 11/07/2025 showed Staff H completed 15 minutes of in-service training.<Staff I>Review of the staff listing showed the facility hired Staff I on 10/16/2024.Review of records provided for training completed since 10/16/2024 showed Staff I had 38 in-service trainings assigned to them and none were completed.In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) review resident rights and the grievance policy in accordance with their process and 2) initiate, investigate and document resolutions for grievances raised during 3 of 3 Resident Council (RC) meetings (11/03/2025, 12/10/2025, and 01/08/2025) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of increased feelings of powerlessness, frustration, and decreased quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's January 2017 Resident Council policy, the facility was responsible for providing staff support for monthly RC meetings to gather and discuss thoughts, ideas, or issues related to the residents' care and treatment. Staff would review old and new business to ensure members had an opportunity to express their concerns. Staff would ensure resident concerns were resolved via the facility's grievance policy and provide updates on each concern by the next RC meeting.Review of the November 2016 Grievance Procedure policy showed staff would resolve grievances immediately, if possible, or complete a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete resident assessments within the regulatory timeframes for 2 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 2 & 5) reviewed for assessment completion and timing. The failure to ensure comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) and Quarterly MDS assessments were completed timely delayed the residents' care planning process, hindered necessary Care Plan (CP) revisions, and placed residents at risk for delayed services, unidentified status change and care needs, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included <Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI - instructional guidelines for MDS completion) Manual>The October 2023 RAI Manual outlined the admission MDS as a comprehensive assessment for a new resident and, under some circumstances, a returning resident, used to promptly assess the resident, develop their CP, and provide the appropriate care necessary to attain and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable well-being; a Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 45 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) accurately reflected the status of 3 of 16 sample residents (Residents 67, 3, & 10) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's March 2019 updated Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Policy, the facility would complete MDS assessments per the RAI Manual.<Resident 67> According to the 12/27/2025 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool), Resident 67 had multiple medical conditions including anxiety and bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness causing extreme shifts in mood, energy, and activity, from intense highs characterized by mania to deep lows characterized by depression, that disrupts daily functioning, sleep, and concentration). The MDS showed Resident 67 was given antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications during the assessment period. The MDS showed Resident 67's was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' Care Plans (CPs) were comprehensive and implemented for 1 of 18 (Resident 22) sample residents whose CPs were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, frustration, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy>The facility was unable to provide a policy describing their CP development and implementation standards and expectations. <Resident 22> According to the 12/18/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 22 had multiple complex conditions including diabetes, depression, anxiety and a chronic heart condition. Review of the revised 10/16/2025 Impaired psychosocial well-being related to depression and anxiety CP showed Resident 22's target behaviors included refusing their medications. This CP included no directions to staff showing what to do when Resident 22 refused their medications. No other CP was developed to address Resident 22's needs related to refusing medications. Review of the January 2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on facility staff for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the assistance they were assessed to require for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 1 & 29) reviewed for ADLs. The failure to provide bathing and grooming assistance for (Residents 29) and nail care for (Resident 1) left residents at risk for body odors, unmet care needs, and a decreased self-worth and/or quality of life. Findings included <Facility Policy>The facility policy titled, Bath or Shower Assistance, updated 11/2016, showed the facility provided ADL assistance according to the resident's Care Plan (CP) and the resident's need for assistance.<Resident 1> According to the 12/26/2025 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 1 had medically complex conditions including diabetes (a condition making it more difficult to control blood sugar), respiratory failure, and muscle weakness. The MDS showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe water temperatures for 2 of 14 resident room sinks (Rooms 215 & 301) reviewed for water temperatures; and failed to secure potentially hazardous items in 1 of 2 clean utility rooms (West Nursing Station clean utility room) reviewed for accident hazards. These failures placed residents at risk for accidents, injury, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.<Policy>According to the facility's July 2008 Washington State Water Temperature Regulations policy, the facility must ensure the hot water system maintained water temperatures at 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F), plus or minus 10 F, for fixtures used by residents and staff.<Water temperatures> <room [ROOM NUMBER]> Observation on 01/13/2026 at 10:33 AM showed the hot water temperature of the sink in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom was 123 F. No residents were present. Observation on 01/13/2026 at 11:32 AM showed Resident 46 independently using the sink in room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement their abuse and neglect policies and procedures regarding identification, investigation, protecting, and reporting of abuse and neglect incidents. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate incidents and allegations of abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect for 7 of 9 residents (Resident 2, 1, 4, 3, 5, 6, 7) reviewed for incidents, failed to identify and report incidents as potential for abuse or neglect related to falls and bruises for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 2, 8), and failed to ensure facility staff implemented abuse policies and procedures and protected residents from further abuse by staff for 1 (Staff D) of 6 staff involved in incidents, when Staff D went back to Resident 4 and Resident 5's room despite an allegation of verbal abuse, and failed to timely report allegations of sexual abuse to local authorities as required for 1 of 2 residents ( Resident 2) reviewed for sexual abuse allegations. These failures placed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 6 residents (Resident 1, 3, 12, 14, 15 ) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic (affect mind, emotions and/or behaviors) medications. Facility staff failed to document identified target behaviors, monitor all target behaviors, document when behaviors occurred, implement and document behavioral interventions before administering medications, assess the effectiveness of the interventions before increasing medications, and to have as needed psychotropic medication (affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) orders with stop dates and physician reassessment for extended use. These failures left residents at risk for unnecessary medications, adverse side effects, unmet needs, and diminished quality of life Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Drugs, updated 10/2022, showed the facility would evaluate and implement interventions for residents on psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 (Resident 1, 12, 3) of 6 residents or resident representatives reviewed were fully informed orally and in writing of the potential risks associated with the use of psychotropic medications (medications that alter the thought process). In addition, based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain informed consent for devices used for 1 (Resident 1) of 4 residents reviewed for devices. These failures prevented residents and/or legal representatives from making informed decisions about the use of multiple antidepressant medications, and precluded them from exercising their right to refuse/decline the proposed medications. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Informed Consent for Psychotropic Drugs, updated 09/2017, showed the facility would obtain informed consent form the resident or resident representative before the drug prescribed is administered. The licensed nurse would review the drug, dosage and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II comprehensive evaluations were obtained, and/or implemented, and incorporated into the Care Plan (CP) for 1 of 7 (Resident 23) residents reviewed for PASRR Level II. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary mental health care and services. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's July 2015 Mental Health Rehabilitation Services policy, residents diagnosed with a mental illness or developmental disability would be prescreened through the PASRR process and receive the treatment they were assessed to require from the evaluation. The policy showed the social services department was responsible for reviewing all residents receiving a Level II PASRR screening. <Resident 23> According to the 09/03/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 23 had medically complex diagnoses including a history of stroke, alcohol dependence, and a psychotic disorder. The MDS showed Resident 23 took…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a process to determine if a potential nursing home resident had mental health/intellectual disability needs which required further assessment/treatment) assessment was accurate to reflect the residents' mental health conditions for 3 of 7 (Residents 22, 57, & 13) residents and 2 supplemental residents (Resident 185 & 53) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate nursing home placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . <Resident 22> According to the 08/12/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 22 had diagnoses including depression, bipolar disorder, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The MDS showed Resident 22 took antidepressant medications. This MDS showed Resident 22 admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2024 Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and/or implement comprehensive Care Plan's (CP) for 6 of 20 sampled residents (Residents 53, 70, 32, 43, 45, & 16) whose CPs were reviewed. The failure to develop comprehensive, individualized, or implement CPs with resident-specific goals and/or interventions, placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Care Plan Development> <Resident 53> According to a 09/02/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple medically complex diagnoses. Review of Resident 53's comprehensive CP showed an Establish the baseline Plan of Care problem was initiated by staff on admission. This CP, over 30 days after Resident 53's admission, did not have any measurable or individualized goals established by staff. <Resident 70> According to an 08/09/2024 admission MDS, Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CPs) were updated and/or revised as needed to reflect person-centered care for 4 (Residents 70, 53, 185, & 13) of 20 sample residents whose CPs were reviewed. The facility failed to ensure residents received and/or participated in care conferences that included the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) for 2 (Residents 21 & 43) residents reviewed. These failures left residents at risk for unmet care needs, inappropriate care, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Care Plan Revision> <Resident 70> According to an 08/09/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple medically complex diagnoses. Review of Resident 70's comprehensive CP showed an Establish the baseline Plan of Care problem was initiated by staff on admission. This CP listed an intervention that Resident 70 was on isolation precautions for having a Peripherally Inserted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL - personal hygiene and other daily routines) was provided for 8 of 11 residents reviewed for ADL (Residents 70, 21, 20, 13, 22, 43, 16, & 45). The failure to provide assistance with getting out of bed, nail care, and bathing placed residents at risk of poor hygiene, diminished sense of self-worth, skin impairment, and frustration. Findings included . <Assistance With Getting Out of Bed> <Resident 70> According to an 08/09/2024 admission MDS, Resident 70 had no memory impairment, was assessed with a functional limitation in range of motion to one side of the lower extremity and had no rejection of care. This MDS showed staff assessed Resident 70 required substantial assistance to roll side to side in bed, was dependent on staff for upper and lower dressing, and transfers from bed to chair were not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns. Observations on 09/29/2024 at 9:45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 7 residents (Resident 70, 16, & 43) reviewed for Range of Motion (ROM) and 1 supplemental resident (Residents 46) received a Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) as ordered. This failure placed residents at risk of further decline in ROM, loss of function, and/or permanent immobility. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's March 2019 Restorative Program policy, residents would be evaluated for restorative needs on admission, quarterly, and with significant changes. The policy showed restorative nursing assistants and other staff would provide RNPs to residents and document on a restorative flow sheet. <Resident 70> According to an 08/09/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 70 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including muscle weakness and difficulty in walking. This MDS showed Resident 70 had a recent surgical procedure involving tendons, ligaments, or muscles, had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    <Resident 185> According to a 09/24/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 185 had clear speech, was understood, and able to understand others. This MDS showed staff assessed Resident 185 with no memory impairment. In an interview on 09/30/24 at 9:45 AM, Resident 185 stated they felt the facility did not have enough staff, especially at shift change, on the night shift. Resident 185 stated they would have to wait anywhere from 15 minutes to one hour to get assistance from staff with their toileting needs.Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide timely assistance to residents, supervise care of residents, meet Activities of Daily Living (ADL) needs including showering/bathing, assisting residents out of bed, and call light response time as evidenced by information provided by 13 (Resident 21, 234, 38, 45, 72, 185, 18, 54, 62, 21, 35, 71, & 61) residents interviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, accidents, and a decreased quality of life. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed pharmacist's monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) were added to resident records and that recommendations were reviewed and followed up timely for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 3, 13, & 23) whose medication regimens were reviewed and 2 supplementary residents (Residents 46 & 16). This failure placed residents at risk for delays in necessary medication changes, at risk for adverse side effects, and negative outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 3> According to a 06/29/2024 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 3 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including dementia, depression, a bipolar disorder (a mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings) and a psychotic disorder (severe mental disorders that cause abnormal thinking and perceptions) and required the use of antidepressant and antipsychotic medications during the assessment period. Review of Resident 3's records showed no documentation that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents 3 & 23) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, were free from unnecessary psychotropic (medication that affected behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) medications. This failure left residents at risk for unnecessary medications, adverse side effects, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 3> According to a 06/29/2024 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 3 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including dementia, depression, a bipolar disorder (a mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings) and a psychotic disorder (severe mental disorders that cause abnormal thinking and perceptions) and required the use of antidepressant and antipsychotic medications during the assessment period. This MDS showed staff documented the last Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) was 05/16/2023, over a year ago, and a GDR was not documented by a physician as clinically contraindicated. Review of Resident 3's September 2024 Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 Percent (%). Failure to properly administer 7 of 26 medications for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 72 & 4) observed during medication pass resulted in a medication error rate of 26.92 %. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving the correct dose or receiving less than the intended therapeutic effects of physician ordered medication. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the 01/2024 facility, Medication Administration Guidelines policy showed medications should be administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. Medications should be verified three times before administering; when pulling a medication package from the medication cart, when the dose is prepared, and before the dose is administered. The policy showed long-acting, extended released, or enteric coated dosage forms should not be crushed. <Resident 72> Observations of medication pass on 10/01/2024 at 9:45 AM, showed Staff FF (Licensed Practical Nurse) prepare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were secured, dated when opened, expired medications and biologicals were disposed of timely in accordance with professional standards, medications were stored at beside only for assessed residents, and ensure medication carts were locked and secured when staff were not present for 2 of 4 medications carts, 1 of 2 medication rooms, and 1 shower room. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving expired medications and access to unsecured, prescription medications. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Medication Storage policy, dated 01/2024, showed medications and biologicals would be stored properly to support safe, effective drug administration. The medication supply would only be accessible to licensed nursing personnel. The policy showed medications would be stored so that various routes of administration would be separated. Internally administered medications would be stored separately from medications such as creams, lotions, and ointments.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement was explained in a form and manner that the resident and/or their representative understood for 4 of 5 residents (Resident 37, 48, 35, & 59) reviewed for arbitration (a procedure used to settle a dispute using an independent person mutually agreed upon by both parties) agreement. This failure placed residents at risk of lacking understanding of the legal document signed, forfeiture (loss or giving up of something) of the right to a jury or court, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's updated September 2022 Arbitration Agreement policy in the admission Agreement packet showed the admissions coordinator would review the arbitration agreement with the resident upon admission to the facility. The policy showed the admissions coordinator was responsible for any questions the resident had about the contract. <Resident 37> According to the 04/09/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 37 was alert and oriented with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <Transmission Based Precautions> According to a 09/21/2024 progress note, Resident 34 tested positive for COVID-19 on that date. The note showed necessary precautions were put in place for Resident 34. According a 09/21/2024 progress note Resident 25 was placed on aerosol contact precautions on that date related to their roommate Resident 34 testing positive for COVID-19. A 09/28/2024 progress note showed Resident 25 tested positive for COVID-19 on that date. Observation on 09/30/24 02:23 PM showed an Aerosol Contact Precaution sign outside room [ROOM NUMBER], both residents in that room were isolated. The sign directed anyone entering the room to put on a gown, gloves, eye protection and an N-95 respirator prior to entering the room. The sign directed everyone to remove all their PPE before leaving the room and replace their eye protection and respirator. At that time Staff O (CNA) heard one of the residents in the room cry out. Staff O already wore eye protection and a respirator and put on a gown and gloves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <Resident 32> Review of Resident 32's records showed an electronically signed form dated 05/24/2021, titled Authorizations and Designations that indicated the resident did not provide an AD to the Facility. Review of Resident 32's notes from the following Care Conferences; 01/10/2024 (admission), 02/01/2024 (quarterly), 04/26/2024 (annual), and 07/29/2024 (quarterly), showed the box indicating a review of Annual and admission paperwork reviewed with resident for AD was not marked for any of the care conferences, indicating a review was not completed with the resident. Review of Resident 32's records showed no AD. According to the 09/07/2024 Quarterly MDS, Resident 32 was understood, had clear comprehension, had multiple medically complex conditions and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an interview on 10/02/2024 at 1:21 PM, Staff D stated AD should be provided to residents on admission and social services should follow up every quarter with the resident for changes. Staff D stated it was very important…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement their Grievance policy for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 54, 70, & 53) reviewed for Grievance reporting. The failure to report, initiate, investigate, and log grievances placed residents at risk for not having grievance resolution delayed or incomplete, feelings of frustration, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of a facility policy titled, Grievance Procedure, updated November 2016, showed residents had the right to voice grievances orally regarding their care and treatment, interactions with other residents, and other concerns during their stay. Staff would be trained at orientation and periodically on the center's grievance procedure which included the need to take grievances seriously, what to do with grievances, when to put grievances in writing, and when to report to their supervisor. <Resident 54> According to the 07/18/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 54 was understood, had clear comprehension, and had no cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to report significant injury of unknown origin for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 16) reviewed. The facility's failure to report a large hematoma of unknown origin on Resident 16's right calf, placed Resident 16 and all residents at risk for repeated incidents and unidentified abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Reporting and Response, published September 2017, showed staff would immediately report all alleged or suspected violations to the supervisor and Executive Director (ED). The policy showed the ED or designee would report injuries of unknown source to the state agency immediately, but no later than two hours. This policy showed the facility would identify the staff responsible for implementation of corrective actions, expected date of implementation, and those responsible for monitoring. The policy showed failure to report potential abuse/neglect timely by staff would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and rule out abuse/neglect for 2 of 12 sampled resident's (Resident 16 & 4) reviewed for investigations. Facility failure to complete thorough investigations placed residents at risk for potential abuse and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Investigation, revised October 2022, showed the facility maintained complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. The policy showed the facility would determine, through investigation, if the abuse/neglect had occurred, the extent, and the cause of the injury. <Resident 16> According to the 08/07/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 16 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was severely cognitively impaired. Resident 16 had diagnoses of paraplegia, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and chronic pain syndrome. The assessment showed Resident 16 was taking blood thinner medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a system to ensure residents received required written notices at the time of transfer/discharge for 3 (Residents 65, 16, & 53) of 4 residents and notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 16 & 53) reviewed for hospitalizations. Failure to ensure written notification to the resident and/or the Resident's Representative (RR) of the reasons for the discharge in writing and in a language and manner they understood, placed residents at risk for a discharge that was not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences. Failure to ensure required LTCO notification was completed, prevented the LTCO the opportunity to educate residents and advocate for them regarding the discharge process. Findings included . <Resident 65> According to the 09/25/2024 Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 65 admitted on [DATE] and had no memory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or the Resident's Representative (RR) a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy, at the time of transfer or within 24 hours, for 3 (Residents 67, 16, & 53) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents and their representatives at risk of not being informed of their right to, and the cost of, holding the resident's bed while hospitalized that was necessary for decision making. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to page 6 of the facility's admission Agreement, updated 05/2017, the facility would provide a bed-hold notice in accordance with applicable regulations and discuss bed-hold rates with the resident and their representative at the time of transfer to an acute hospital. <Resident 67> Review of Resident 67's 09/19/2024 Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE], with their return…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were clarified for 1 of 21 sample residents (Resident 29), or followed for 2 of 21 sample residents (Residents 4 &3). These failures placed residents at risk for unneeded care and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Clarifying Orders> <Resident 29> According to the 07/10/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 29 had medically complex diagnoses including cancer and high cholesterol. Review of the physician's orders showed a 08/15/2024 order for a fiber supplement, give one pill as needed. The order did not include a dosage. In an interview on 10/04/2024 at 2:13 PM Staff B (Director of Nursing) stated the order should include a dose and needed clarification <Following Orders> <Resident 4> According to the 09/04/2024 Quarterly MDS, Resident 4 had medically complex diagnoses including a chronic ulcer. The MDS showed Resident 4 received opioid medications. Record review showed a 12/06/2023 order for an opioid pain medication, give twice a day for chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure activity programs met the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 sample residents (Resident 32) reviewed for activities. Failure to provide meaningful activities left residents at risk for boredom, frustration, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's updated July 2015 Activities Program policy the facility would provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests as well as physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. For residents confined to their room, the Activity Department would provide and assist with in-room activities in keeping with needs, abilities, and interests of residents. <Resident 32> According to a 05/15/2024 Quarterly admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) activities were very important for Resident 32. The MDS showed Resident 32 preferred to have books and newspapers, listen to music, and participate in their activities of choice. The assessment showed Resident 32 had moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of accident hazards for 4 (Residents 41, 57, 43, & 16) supplemental residents reviewed. The failure to ensure residents were free from potential restraints (Resident 41), ensure staff safely used and monitored air mattresses (Residents 57, 16, & 43), ensure sharps (syringe needles, razors etc.), and chemicals were stored safely, placed residents at risk for potential restraints, injury, exposure to soiled medical equipment, and unsafe chemicals. Findings included . <Resident Mattress> <Resident 41> According to the 06/27/2024 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 41 had moderate memory impairment and needed substantial assistance from staff to roll from side to side in bed. Observation on 09/30/2024 at 2:21 PM showed a folded blanket placed under the right side of Resident 41's mattress between the mattress and the bed frame. The blanket raised the right side of the mattress one-to-two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 sample residents (Residents 32, 45, 53, 185, & 22) reviewed for oxygen administration were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice. Failure to provide oxygen treatments and maintain oxygen equipment left residents at risk for respiratory discomfort, oxygen-related accidents, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's December 2017, Oxygen Administration Policy, oxygen would be provided in accordance with physician's orders, state and federal regulations, and standards of practice. Safety precautions and care of oxygen delivery equipment were performed according to state and federal regulation and manufacturer guidance, equipment that was soiled would be replaced. Oxygen liter flow would be set by a licensed nurse in accordance with physician's orders including liter flow and parameters for duration and frequencies. <Providing Oxygen as Ordered>…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents consistent with professional standards of practice including the failure to offer nonpharmacological interventions, identify parameters for administration of as needed (PRN) pain medications, and administer pain medications timely for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 16) reviewed for pain management. These failures placed residents at risk for experiencing untreated pain and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 16> According to a 09/03/2024 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 16 admitted [DATE] and was severely cognitively impaired. The assessment showed Resident 16 received pain medications routinely and PRN. The MDS showed Resident 16 did not receive non-medication interventions for pain. The MDS showed a pain assessment interview should not be conducted with Resident 16/Resident Representative (RR) at the time of the assessment. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 20 sample residents (Residents 23 & 72) were free from significant medication errors. These failures placed residents at risk for incorrect dosage, adverse side effects, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the 01/2024 facility, Medication Administration Guidelines policy showed medications should be administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. Medications should be verified three times before administering; when pulling medication package from medication cart, when dose is prepared, and before dose is administered. <Resident 23> According to the 09/03/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 23 had diagnoses including stroke with communication deficits, dementia, a history of alcohol dependence, psychotic disorder, and a disorder related to personality and behaviors. The MDS showed Resident 23 was administered routine antipsychotic medication. Review of the September 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain timely laboratory services to meet the needs of 1 (Resident 3) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Failure to obtain physician ordered blood tests for residents who were assessed to require this service, placed residents at risk for delayed treatment and services. Findings included . <Resident 3> According to a 06/29/2024 Annual Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), Resident 3 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including heart failure, high blood pressure, diabetes (a chronic disease in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugars), lung disease, and a thyroid disorder. Review of Resident 3's September 2024 Medication Administration Records showed a 09/05/2024, STAT [immediate] order for a Complete Blood Count (CBC - a comprehensive blood test), a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP - a blood test that measures chemical balance in your blood), and a Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone level (TSH - a blood test to measure how well the thyroid is functioning) related to the resident having…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food and drinks served to residents were stored and distributed under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 facility kitchen. The failure to store canned and frozen food appropriately, ensure food was covered when distributed in the hall, and ensure the ice machine was clean, placed residents at risk for spoiled food and foodborne illness. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's February 2011 Dented Cans policy, all canned food items should be inspected by dietary staff upon delivery. The policy showed cans with significant dents should not be used and instead returned to the vendor <Dry Storage> Observation of the facility's dry food storage area on 09/29/2024 at 9:27 AM showed one large can of apricots, one large can of sliced apples, and three cans of diced pears that were all significantly dented. In an interview at that time Staff CC (Food and Nutrition Service Aide) stated cans with dents should be discarded. Staff CC said the dented cans should not be in the dry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents records were complete and accurate and readily accessible for 3 of 20 residents (Resident 16, 43, & 45) whose records were reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Task Care Record documentation was complete and accurate. Failure to ensure residents records were complete and accurate placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and inaccurate assessments. Findings included . <Resident 16> Review of Resident 16's August 2024 Task Care Records (documentation of resident specific cares offered/provided) showed staff failed to document multiple cares on multiple days. Similar findings were noted on Resident 16's September 2024 and October 2024 Task Care Records. <Resident 43> Review of Resident 43's July 2024 Task Care Records showed staff failed to document multiple cares on multiple days. Similar findings were noted on Resident 43's August 2024, September 2024, and October 2024 Task Care Records. <Resident 45> Review of Resident 45's June 2024 Task Care Records showed staff failed to document multiple cares…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed, implemented timely, or were clarified as needed; Care Plans (CP) developed for 3 (Resident 2, 4, 3) of 3 residents reviewed; medications were not provided as ordered, for 1 (Resident 5) of 3 residents reviewed; and to monitor weights and bowels, act on, or implement their policies for 4 (Residents 3, 2, 1, 4 ) of 4 residents reviewed. These failures placed all residents at risk for unmet care needs, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Following, Implementation & Clarification of Physicians Orders & CP> <Resident 2> Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) showed Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE], was able to make their needs known, make their own decisions, and had behaviors of rejecting care four to six days out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 (Residents 3, 4, 1) residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers (PU, injury to the skin and underlying tissue due to prolonged pressure), received necessary care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, and prevent new ulcers from developing. Failure to timely monitor, assess, implement wound provider recommendations, and preventative skin measures placed all resident's at risk for deterioration in skin condition(s), pain, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Skin Integrity, updated 10/2022, showed to maintain the resident's skin integrity and promote healing of skin ulcers/PU's/wounds the facility would use a systematic approach and monitoring process to evaluate and document skin integrity. When a resident admitted to the facility with or developed a skin ulcer/PU/wound the facility would provide care to treat, heal, and prevent,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for nutrition maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Failure to ensure consistent, timely weights and re-weights, identify significant weight changes timely, notify interested parties timely, and implement Registered Dietician's (RD) recommendations placed the residents at risk for delayed identification of interventions to prevent continued weight loss and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Weights, revised on 10/12/2023, showed weighing criteria included obtaining a weight on the day of admission then weekly for one month. The policy showed guidelines for residents who may need to be weighed weekly due to; food intake declined and persisted, slow trending weight loss or gain, significant weight loss or gain, multiple stage two Pressure Ulcers (PU, injury to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain informed consent for residents who were assessed to require a decision maker due to cognitive impairments before performing Covid-19 testing for 5 (Residents 6, 7, 2, 8, 9) of 5 residents reviewed for resident's rights. These failures placed all residents with decision makers unable to exercise their right to be fully informed in a language they could understand and removed their ability to refuse Covid-19 testing. Findings included . Review of the facility, Notice of Resident Rights under Federal Law policy, updated 10/2016 showed the resident had the right to formulate an advanced directive (included a durable power of attorney (DPOA) and health care directives the resident chooses) and to have rights exercised by a representative, whether the resident was judged incompetent or not, to the extent allowed by law. <Resident 6> Review of a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 01/19/2024, showed Resident 6 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-09 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their Resident Representative (RR) was provided a transfer or discharge notice in writing in a language or manner they understood and send a copy to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (SLTCO). The notice must contain the reason for transfer or discharge, location, a statement of appeal rights, and information for contacting the Ombudsman. The failure to provide written transfer/discharge notice to 4 of 4 residents (Resident #28, #32, #33, #60) upon facility-initiated transfer to the hospital prevented residents from inappropriate discharge, provide residents with access to an advocate who can inform them of their options and rights and to ensure the SLTCO is aware of facility practices and activities related to transfers and discharges. Findings included . Review of the 10/2019 facility policy Transfer and Discharge showed the facility would provide a written notice of transfer to the resident using the Resident Notice of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-09 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide residents or the Resident's Representative (RR) with a bed-hold notice upon transfer to the hospital for 3 of 4 residents (Resident 28, 33, and 60) reviewed for hospitalization. The failure to provide a copy of the written bed-hold notice and reserve bed payment policy upon transfer to the hospital, regardless of payment source, prevented residents from exercising their rights and choice to return to the facility upon hospital discharge. Findings included . The 10/2019 Bed-hold policy showed the nursing staff would provide the resident and/or their RR a copy of the Notice of Bed Hold Policy upon transfer or discharge to the hospital. The policy showed the resident or responsible party would complete the bed-hold notice and sign to hold or refuse the bed-hold. <Resident 28> Review of the 05/22/2023 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) showed Resident 28 was cognitively intact and could make themselves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications and vaccinations were stored at the appropriate temperature and failed to dispose of expired medications in a timely manner in 2 of 2 medication rooms (East and [NAME] Medication Room) and 1 of 3 medication carts (East Medication Cart) reviewed for medication storage. The failure to dispose of expired medications placed residents at risk for narcotic drug diversion and at risk of administration of expired or discontinued medication. The failure to monitor and document refrigerator temperatures twice daily when storing vaccinations placed residents at risk for administered vaccinations that were no longer useful. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The undated facility policy Discontinued Medications directed staff to remove discontinued medication from the medication cart immediately upon receipt of an order to discontinue the medication to avoid continued administration. The undated facility policy Controlled Substances showed controlled substances had a potential for abuse and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure 3 of 4 nurses (Staff P- Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN, Staff K- LPN, Staff N- LPN) followed hand hygiene procedures when in direct contact with residents. The failure to complete hand hygiene during medication administration placed residents at risk for illness, infections, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Hand Hygiene> Observation of Medication Pass on 08/07/2023 at 9:09 AM showed Staff P (Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN) wearing gloves and prepared to administer a syringe of diabetic medication to a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff P stated to the resident they would be right back, removed gloves and left the room. Staff P went to the medication cart, helped another nurse find something in the cart, grabbed a new pair of gloves and returned to room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff P did not use hand gel (alcohol-based hand sanitizer) when entering room [ROOM NUMBER] and did not use hand gel before putting on the gloves. Staff P…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered Care Plan (CP), and the resident's choices for 1 resident (Resident 36) of 7 residents reviewed for pain, non-pressure skin, and oxygen management. The failure to assess, care plan, monitor, and follow Physician Orders (PO) placed Resident 36 at risk for overdose of opioid medication, untreated skin issues, worsening medical conditions, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The 05/25/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 36 participated in the assessment, was cognitively intact, able to make self-understood, understand others, had no behaviors, and no refusals of care. Resident 36 had multiple complex diagnoses including intervertebral disc degeneration (breakdown of the spaces between the bones of the back) and opioid dependence. Resident 36 was assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents and hazards for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 54) reviewed for smoking. The failure to assess Resident 54's smoking safety and develop a Care Plan (CP) to monitor and prevent accidents placed Resident 54 at risk for falls, burns, other injuries, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The 06/07/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 54 was cognitively intact, able to make themself understood and understand others. Resident 54 was assessed with unsteady walking and turning, and used a walker. Resident 54 was assessed to require supervision when walking inside their room and the hallway and extensive assistance with locomotion off the unit. An observation on 08/06/2023 at 7:05 AM showed Resident 54 exited the locked entrance door of the facility. Resident 54 exited the building unsupervised. In an interview on 08/06/2023 at 7:50 AM, Staff A (Administrator) stated the facility was non-smoking. Staff A stated one resident would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$68,159 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $68,159 — penalty dated 2024-02-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 43 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alaska Gardens Health and RehabilitationTacoma, WA 1 of 5El Jen Skilled CareLas Vegas, NV 1 of 5Firesteel Healthcare CenterMitchell, SD 1 of 5Gardnerville Health & Rehabilitation CenterGardnerville, NV 1 of 5Laurel Health & Rehabilitation CenterLaurel, MT 1 of 5Livingston Health & Rehabilitation CenterLivingston, MT 1 of 5Palisade Healthcare CenterGarretson, SD 1 of 5Portland Health And RehabilitationPortland, OR 1 of 5Riverview Healthcare CenterFlandreau, SD 1 of 5Shepherd of the Valley Rehabilitation and WellnessCasper, WY 1 of 5Worland Health and RehabilitationWorland, WY 2 of 5Aspen Meadows Health And Rehabilitation CenterBillings, MT 2 of 5Enumclaw Health and RehabilitationEnumclaw, WA 2 of 5Granite Rehabilitation and WellnessCheyenne, WY 2 of 5Independence Health And RehabilitationIndependence, OR 2 of 5Laramie Health and RehabilitationLaramie, WY 2 of 5Mountain View Health And RehabilitationCarson City, NV 2 of 5North Cascades Health and RehabilitationBellingham, WA 2 of 5Seattle Medical Post Acute CareSeattle, WA 2 of 5Shelton Health and RehabilitationShelton, WA 2 of 5Village Health CareGresham, OR 2 of 5Wind River Rehabilitation and WellnessRiverton, WY 3 of 5Fountain Springs HealthcareRapid City, SD 3 of 5La Grande Post Acute RehabLa Grande, OR 3 of 5Pahrump Health And RehabilitationPahrump, NV 3 of 5Prairie View Healthcare CenterWoonsocket, SD 3 of 5Rawlins Rehabilitation and WellnessRawlins, WY 3 of 5Royal Park Health and RehabilitationSpokane, WA 3 of 5Sage View Care CenterRock Springs, WY 3 of 5Thermopolis Rehabilitation and WellnessThermopolis, WY 3 of 5Wheatcrest Hills Healthcare CenterBritton, SD 3 of 5Windsor Health And RehabilitationSalem, OR 4 of 5Americana Health and RehabilitationLongview, WA 4 of 5Buena Vista HealthcareColville, WA 4 of 5Frontier Rehabilitation and Extended CareLongview, WA 4 of 5Hillsboro Health And RehabilitationHillsboro, OR 4 of 5Hot Springs Health & Rehabilitation CenterHot Springs, MT 4 of 5Missoula Health & Rehabilitation CenterMissoula, MT 4 of 5Polson Health & Rehabilitation CenterPolson, MT 4 of 5The Dalles Health And RehabilitationThe Dalles, OR

Showing 40 of 43; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
PACIFIC NORTHWEST SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS (WA) LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/31/2023
CH PACIFIC NORTHWEST HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
PACIFIC NORTHWEST SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/31/2023
WITZCORP GLOBAL LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
HERZKA, YISROELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
YENOWITZ, YITZCHOKIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/10/2025
BAYHON, MARISSAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
ODENTHAL, JASONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
COUVE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
PACIFIC NORTHWEST OPCO MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
WASHINGTON SNF CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
PANLASIGUI, LEONICOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
PIERCE, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
SPIELMAN, SHIMONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
WRIGHT, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$245K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 8%Other / private 22%

This home reported $245K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$492per resident / day
operating cost
$14,962per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$442per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505344. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next