Pahrump Health And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 35.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 101.8 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-09 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a full code status was provided basic life support (BLS) after having been found unresponsive for 1 of 9 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice deprived the resident of life-saving measures, specifically cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) which may have potentially increased the resident's chances of recovery and survival. Findings include: Resident 1 (R1) R1 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset, nutritional deficiency, and urinary tract infection (UTI). A provider order for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) dated [DATE], revealed R1 was evaluated by the physician assistant to have decisional capacity and the resident elected to be a full code (attempt CPR in the event of cardiopulmonary arrest). A quarterly social services assessment dated [DATE], revealed R1 expressed wanting to remain full code. A nursing progress note…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-10-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to 1) monitor and report a decline in function for 1 of 19 residents (Resident 65) and 2) identify and report a resident's increase in pain related to worsening contractures for 1 of 19 unsampled residents (Resident 14). The deficient practice placed the residents at risk for diminished function and potentially an impact on the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of the residents. Findings include: Resident 14 (R14) R14 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including contractures of the right hand and foot. According to the Minimum Data Set, R14 scored a 03 which indicated the resident was not able to make needs well known. R14 was also diagnosed with aphasia (inability to articulate spoken words). Review of R14's care plan revised on 03/26/2024, identified: - Resident had limited physical mobility related to cerebral vascular accident (stroke). Goals included: - The resident will remain free of complications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review the facility failed to ensure the physician ordered dressing changes for a midline catheter (a small flexible tube inserted into a vein of the upper arm) for 1 of 33 sampled residents (Resident 84). The deficient practice had the potential for the midline catheter to become infected due to the dressing not being changed.Findings include:Resident 84 (R84) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region, urinary tract infection, and acute kidney failure. On 12/16/2025 at 11:22 AM, R84 was lying in bed with a midline catheter in the upper left arm. The midline dressing was not dated.A Physician Order dated 11/27/2025 documented may insert midline for intravenous (IV) antibiotics. R84's medical record lacked a physician order for midline dressing changes. On 12/17/2025 at 12:18 PM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) explained residents with IV lines would have the dressing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a smoking safety evaluation was completed to determine whether a resident was safe to smoke independently or required supervision for 1 of 33 sampled residents (Resident 39); and 2) and prevent residents or staff from smoking in the facility enclosed courtyard. The deficient practice had the potential to place residents, staff, and visitors at risk of injury related to smoking.Findings include:1) Resident 39 (R39) was admitted [DATE], readmitted [DATE], with diagnosis including paraplegia, anxiety disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. R39 was listed on the facility's smokers list.A Care Plan dated 11/30/2025, documented resident was a smoker.On 12/16/2025 at 11:22 AM, R39 reported going outside the facility grounds to smoke independently.On 12/18/2025 at 7:10 AM, R39 was observed outside, across the street from the facility, seated in a wheelchair and smoking alone without staff supervision.A Smoking Safety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to communicate to the dialysis center, the need for contact precautions related to infectious dermatitis for 1 of 33 sampled residents (Resident 11). The deficient practice had the potential to place others at risk for transmission of infection. Findings include:Resident 11 (R11) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis of lumbar region, polyneuropathy, and end stage renal disease dependance on renal dialysis. On 12/16/2025 at 1:18 PM, R11 had rash that staff treated with medication and isolation and the resident goes to dialysis. A Physician Order, undated, documented dialysis Monday, Wednesday and Friday.A Nursing Progress note dated 11/26/2025 documented the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified of a new rash with small pustule like areas. A Physician Order dated 12/08/2025, documented contact precautions as recommended for residents known or suspected to be infected with infectious agents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure medication was not left unattended on top of a medication cart. The deficient practice had the potential for placing residents at risk for improper use of medication.Findings include: On 12/18/2025 at 8:12 AM, a medication bottle of fluticasone propionate nasal spray 50 micrograms (a medication used for nasal symptoms such as congestion, sneezing, runny nose, and nasal itching), was observed on top of a mediation cart in the hallway, unattended and accessible to any person walking by. The nurse was observed inside a nearby resident's room. On 12/18/2025 at 8:15 AM, a Registered Nurse (RN), confirmed had left the medication unattended on top of the medication cart and walked away to enter a resident's room. The RN acknowledged should not have left the medication unattended and accessible to all due to resident safety risks if ingested or used by a resident. On 12/18/2025 at 11:29 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON), stated medication should not have been left out unattended. The DON explained if a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) the use of protective personal equipment (PPE) for 1 of 33 sampled residents (Resident 18) and 2 unsampled residents (Resident 16 and 115) on contact precautions and enhanced barrier precautions and 2) report an outbreak of infectious dermatitis to the state health authority. The deficient practice had the potential for the spread of infectious organisms.Findings include:1) On 12/17/2025 at 11:45 AM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) explained if a resident was on contact precautions, staff were to apply personal protective equipment (PPE) as listed on the signage prior to entering the resident room and remove prior to exiting the resident room. For residents that require Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) the PPE would be applied when staff were providing direct care tasks for the residents. A. On 12/18/2025 at 9:28 AM, R115 had a sign posted to the left of the door which documented the following: -Contact Precautions everyone must clean hands, including before entering and when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and document review, the facility failed to ensure food concerns raised by the resident group were acted on, followed through and facility's actions (if any) were communicated back to the resident group. The deficient practice had the potential to have negative psycho-social outcomes to the residents. Findings include: On 10/09/2024 in the morning, Resident 51 (R51) was alert, oriented, and answered questions appropriately. R51 revealed being the President of the Resident Council. R51 explained the resident council meets on a regular basis every month to discuss any concerns to be brought to the attention of the facility staff. Discussions during the resident council were recorded by a staff member during the meeting. The Resident Council President indicated on the following dates the resident council discussed concerns regarding meals with no follow up or response from the facility: - 06/06/2024 - 07/11/2024 - 08/2024 - 09/06/2024 - 10/04/2024 On 10/09/2024 at 11:03 AM, the Resident Council President indicated food has been discussed on a regular basis, but the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) kitchen staff were wearing appropriate facial coverings during food preparation and 2) molded strawberries were not being prepped for service. The deficient practice placed residents at risk for food related illnesses from ingesting contaminated food. Findings include: On 10/08/24 at 8:45 AM, the kitchen director and a cook were observed to have full beards and were not wearing beard nets during the initial tour of the kitchen. The kitchen director stated they should have been wearing beard nets. On 10/10/24 at 11:27 AM, observed another cook preparing multiple fruit salad plates, used strawberries that came from a container with a heavily molded strawberry. The cook was made aware of the molded strawberry, picked it up and attempted to throw it out of the container. The kitchen director who was watching the encounter told the cook to throw out the entire container of strawberries stating that the other strawberries were also contaminated. The kitchen director stated the staff member will need to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for a resident who was admitted with a condom catheter for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 140). The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for not receiving appropriate care related to the condom catheter which included perineal care and site monitoring. Findings include: Resident 140 (R140) R140 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease stage 3 and atherosclerotic vascular disease. On 10/08/2024 at 10:43 AM, R140 laid flat in bed with eyes closed, a family member was at bedside. The family member indicated the resident was in the hospital for eight days following a fall at home and R140 had significantly declined in cognitive and physical abilities since the hospitalization. The family member explained R140 had only half a kidney left, was incontinent and had a urinary catheter which was placed in the hospital. The family member…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a physician's PRN order for an anti-anxiety medication had a stop date for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 70) and 2) a gradual dose reduction was attempted for a psychotropic medication for 2 of 19 sampled residents (Residents 23 and 70). The deficient practice placed the residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications. Findings include: The facility policy titled Psychotropic Drugs, documented psychotropic drugs were any drug which affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. Residents taking psychotropic medications would undergo a gradual dose reduction unless contraindicated. As needed psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days unless a rationale was provided by the practitioner and documented in the medical record. Resident 70 (R70) R70 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including mood disorder and anxiety disorder. 1) An active physician order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure outdated and expired vaccine vials were discarded in accordance with the facility's policy. Specifically, two opened vials of Influenza vaccine (formula Year 2023-2024) were found inside the medication refrigerator. The deficient practice placed residents at risk for receiving outdated and expired Influenza vaccine during flu season 2024-2025. Findings include: On [DATE] at 9:12 AM, an inspection of the medication refrigerator in the 100-Hall storage room revealed two vials of Flucelvax Quadrivalent Influenza vaccine (formula 2023-2024), Lot number AU313OB. Both vials were opened with contents, not labeled with open date, and had an expiration date of [DATE]. On [DATE] at 9:15 AM, the Resident Care Manager (RCM) confirmed the observation and explained RCMs were responsible for checking the medication rooms on a monthly basis to inspect for expired patient care medications and items. The RCM could not speak to why the Influenza…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$40,427 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $26,800 — penalty dated 2024-10-11
• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-04-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $194K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV