Royal Park Health and Rehabilitation
7411 North Nevada, Spokane, WA 99208 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 164 certified beds · (509) 489-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 7 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $111,830 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.9% | 14.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 26.7% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.8% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.3% | 22.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.5% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.7% | 82.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 14.2% | 19.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.3% | 13.4% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 341 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 129 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.0%CMS range 41.5–50.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 7.3–12.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 49.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.6–9.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 164 beds and averages 106.6 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-07-16 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure provider orders were consistently followed to track ostomy (a surgically placed opening [stoma] in the abdomen to allow body waste to pass into a collection bag) output, teach the resident to manage their ostomy independently, consistently assess and monitor skin around the stoma and provide and document ostomy care consistent with professional standards for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) reviewed for ostomy care. Resident 1 experienced harm when they developed excoriation (skin breakdown), redness and weeping, around their ostomy so facility staff were unable to securely adhere the ostomy bag to the skin and required the resident's transfer to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. Findings included:The 2022 article titled Living with an Ileostomy, published by United Ostomy Associations of America (a nonprofit organization that supports and educates people who have ostomies) at www.ostomy.org, documented that the output/stool from an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate staff supervision for the bed mobility and reassess a resident's ability to assist after a room change and level of consciosness to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 2), reviewed for falls. Resident 2 experienced harm when they were rolled toward the edge of their bed by a staff member during a bed linen change, rolled off the bed headfirst onto the floor, required transfer to the hospital and sustained a subdural hematoma (a serious condition where blood collects between the skull and the surface of the brain, usually caused by a head injury). Findings included . Review of a facility assessment, dated 02/07/2025, showed Resident 2 had diagnoses to include heart failure, below the knee amputation, and obesity. Resident 2 was able to make their needs known. The Care Area Assessment summary (CAA), for functional ability, showed the resident had impaired functional mobility and was dependent on staff to transfer, toilet, and for bed mobility. During an observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the correct dose of pain medication for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for medication errors. Resident 1 experienced experienced harm when they had uncontrolled pain that required hospital transfer when Staff administered 50 mg of Tramadol (an opioid medication used for moderate to severe pain) instead of 100 mg, as ordered. Findings included . Review of a facility assessment, dated 03/17/2025, showed Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses to include sciatica (a condition where a nerve root in the lower back was compressed or irritated which could cause pain and radiated down the leg along the affected nerve) and a progressive neurological disorder that affected movement. Resident 1 was able to make their needs known. Review of the Resident 1's care plan, dated 03/13/2025, identified the resident was on pain medication therapy. Saff were to administer the pain medications as ordered by the physician, monitor for side effects and effectiveness of the medication. Review of a facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the resident's highest practicable level of well-being for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for diabetes management. Resident 1 experienced harm when they were found unresponsive from a blood sugar of 39 milligrams (mg)/deciliter (dl) (a normal blood sugar ranges from 80 mg/dl to 130 mg/dl) and Staff administered an oral glucose gel which resulted in Resident 1 aspiration (when food or drink goes into the lung). This failure placed other residents at risk for diminished quality of care. Findings included . Review of the facility assessment, dated 10/28/2024, showed Resident 1 had diagnoses to include diabetes and lung disease. Resident 1 had some difficulty making their needs known. Per the assessment, the resident took insulin (a hormone that helps regulate blood sugar levels) to manage their diabetes. Resident 1 was set up assist for self-care which included eating. Review of a facility policy titled Hypoglycemia [low blood sugar]/Hyperglycemia [high blood sugar]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-08-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from sexual abuse by a staff member for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse. Resident 1 experienced harm when they reported a staff member had sexual intercourse with them and the sexual assault exam showed abrasions consistent with penile penetration. This failure placed the resident at risk for further abuse and psychosocial harm. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Resident Property Prohibition Policy, updated 10/2022, showed each resident has the right to be free from abuse, including verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse . Sexual Abuse was defined as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Review of the facility assessment, dated 07/02/2024, showed Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses to include respiratory disease and Diabetes. The resident was alert and oriented and able to make their needs known. Resident 1 required moderate assistance with Activities of Daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure supervision was provided as planned 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for falls. Resident 2 experienced harm when they fell out of their bed and sustained a head laceration and skull fracture. This failure placed residents at risk for similar falls, injuries, and adverse outcomes. Findings included . The 02/2000 facility policy titled Fall Evaluation (Morse Scale) and Management documented the licensed nurse completes the Morse Scale, (an assessment tool that helps determine if a resident is at high risk for falls), then implements the appropriate care plan interventions for fall risk management based on the resident's medical history and evaluation. <Resident 2> A review of the record showed Resident 2 had diagnoses including dementia, failure to thrive, and osteoporosis (weak or brittle bones). The 05/01/2024 annual comprehensive assessment documented Resident 2 was severely cognitively impaired, was not understood when speaking,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide needed pain management for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for pain. Resident 1 experienced harm when the facility did not ensure they had the ordered pain medication, or another effective alternative, to treat the resident timely and the resident had to be transferred to the hospital in order to relieve their pain. This failure placed residents at risk of uncontrolled pain and diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the facility assessment, dated 11/22/2023, Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses which included surgery to repair a fracture. The resident was able to make their needs known. Review of nurse progress notes, dated 11/16/2023, showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 1:00 PM. Resident 1 rated their pain as a 8/9 out of 10 (pain scale used where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain). It was explained to the resident their pain medication was to be given every six hours and their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a system of accounting for controlled drugs (substances or medications that had a high potential for abuse, misuse and addiction) in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation in 3 of 3 medication room emergency medication kits (Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] - Oak, Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] - Evergreen, and Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]- Transitional Care Unit -TCU), reviewed for medication storage. This failure created a risk of potential undetected drug diversion. Findings included.During an observation and interview on 05/04/2026 at 10:46 AM, the refrigerator in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] - Oak unit medication room was observed with Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN). The refrigerator contained a clear plastic emergency medication kit (e-kit) that separated medications into multiple compartments. Review of the paper inventory sheet attached to the front of the kit documented the kit was to contain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and implement a care plan for a positioning device (wedge to keep head raised) that was provided to 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 16) reviewed for positioning and mobility. This failure placed the resident at risk for unsafe conditions, risk of poor body alignment and improper positioning. The 04/06/2026 quarterly assessment documented Resident 16 had diagnoses that included dementia and difficult swallowing. Resident 16 was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance for rolling to their left or right side then returning to their back when in bed.The 04/27/2023 care plan documented Resident 16 required assistance with activities of daily living, had esophageal reflux (a disease where the stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus and casues heartburn - a burning chest pain near the sternum), and was at risk for pressure ulcers and falls. Staff were instructed to wait at least one hour after meals, then lay the resident down between meals, keep the head of bed elevated, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided to a resident per providers orders for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 42) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs. Findings included. A quarterly assessment dated [DATE], showed that Resident 42 had severely impaired cognition and diagnoses of Congested Heart Failure (CHF, a long-term condition where the heart cannot pump blood effectively) and Osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease.) The resident was fully dependent on facility staff for their grooming and bathing. On 04/28/2026 at 10:43 AM, Resident 42 was observed sleeping in bed with their feet visible. Their toenails were long, thickened, and curved over the end of the toes and onto the skin. There was red polish on the ends, that had grown out over a quarter of an inch. Additionally, there was a scabby, dried, greenish area next to the right big toenail. The April 2026 Treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor a resident for latent injuries after numerous falls for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 4), reviewed for accidents. Specifically, the facility did not complete vital signs (VS- temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure) and neurological checks (neuro checks, an assessment used to evaluate the residents' level of consciousness, movement, hand grasps, pupil size and reaction) after unwitnessed falls. This failed practice placed residents at risk for unidentified injuries and diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled Fall Management and Neurological Check, updated January 2025, showed that the facility implemented a fall management plan based on medical history and the resident evaluation. Review of the facility document titled Neurological Evaluation Flow Sheet, updated January 2025, showed when initiated, neuro checks and vital signs (VS) were to be completed hourly for four hours, then every four hours for 24 hours. A 04/23/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, two medications for Resident 2 were not held or administered when indicated according to parameters ordered by the provider. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse health complications and diminished quality of life. Findings included.The 02/05/2026 comprehensive admission assessment documented Resident 2 had diagnoses that included Heart Failure (ineffective pumping of the heart that caused fluid build-up, swelling of limbs and difficult breathing) and low blood pressure. Resident 2 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident 2's medication orders included the following: - 02/16/2026: Metoprolol twice daily for heart failure, hold for systolic blood pressure (SBP, the top number of a blood pressure reading) less than 110, and heart rate (HR) less than 60 beats per minute.-02/27/2026: Midodrine three times daily for low blood pressure. On 03/20/2026, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a particular type of drinking cup was consistently provided as care planned and ordered for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 16) reviewed for assistive devices. This failure placed the resident at risk of swallowing difficulties and unintended health consequences.Findings included.On 02/06/2025, the physician's order noted, Resident 16 to use a sippy cup (drink aid designed to control liquid flow and promote safe swallowing with lid) for all drinks, no straws. The 04/06/2026 quarterly assessment documented Resident 16 had diagnoses that included dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 16 had severe cognitive impairments, required moderate assistance from staff for eating, and received daily eating/swallowing skill practice during the assessment look back period. The 04/27/2023 care plan documented Resident 16 had activities of daily living (ADL) self-care deficits. On 04/16/2025, the care plan was updated to show Resident 16 used 2-handled cups for assistive devices. On 04/17/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards for food service safety regarding cleanliness, hand hygiene and facial hair being covered for 3 of 3 food preparation areas (Kitchen, Main Dining Room and Steam Table). These failures placed residents at risk for food-borne illnesses.Findings included .<Kitchen cleanliness>During the initial Kitchen tour on 04/27/2026 at 9:00 AM with Staff P, Dietary Supervisor, crumbs and food debris were observed on counters, stove, steam table and the toaster area. The stovetop had dried, crusted food debris and a large, dried, crusted spill on the stovetop. Additionally, there was dried splatter on the backsplash behind the stove and dried drips down the right side of the stove. There was a large pot of soup simmering on the stove, over the dried spill. While this surveyor was inspecting the dry storage area, Staff P returned to the kitchen, moved the soup to another burner, removed the stovetop tray with the spill, and brought it to the dishwashing area. Staff P then began to wipe off the counters. <Hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-09-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided to meet the needs of 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medication management. The failure placed residents at risk for adverse events related to missed medications.Findings included .<Resident 1>Review of Resident 1's care plan, dated 02/06/2025 showed they had a diagnosis of a shoulder fracture and chronic pain. The same care plan had interventions, dated 02/11/2025, that included: the resident's pain is alleviated/relieved by rest and medications and administer analgesia (pain medication) as per orders.Review of the resident's admit orders, dated 02/06/2025, showed the following narcotic pain medication:-Morphine 30 mg (milligram) immediate release (IR) (a short acting, strong narcotic pain medication): Take 1 tablet by mouth twice daily. Review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for August 2025 showed an order dated 02/06/2025, for Morphine 30 mg to be given two times daily at 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. On 08/07/2025 at 7:00 PM the MAR shows code OO…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 4 dependent residents (Resident 1 and 3), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), received the appropriate number of baths per week. This failure placed residents at risk for poor hygiene and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of a facility assessment, dated 05/14/2025, showed the resident was admitted with diagnoses to include a stroke with one sided weakness. The resident had aphasia (affects the ability to produce spoken or written language, even though the individual may understand language). Resident #1 had difficulty making their needs known. The resident's care plan, dated 02/19/2025, showed the resident was to be showered twice a week. It was noted the resident preferred bed baths but staff should continue to offer for the resident to use the shower. Review of Resident 1's shower record from 05/09/2025 to 06/09/2025 showed the resident received a bed bath on 05/09/2025 and not again until 05/19/2025, 10 days later. The next bed bath was 7 days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility had enough staff to provide care according to facility acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses, physical, mental, and cognitive limitations, and conditions) and/or care plans for 5 of 9 sampled resident's (Resident 40, 31, 27, 24 and 28), reviewed for sufficient staffing. This failure placed all residents at risk for potentially avoidable accidents, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility assessment reviewed 08/15/2024, showed staffing levels were determined at the facility level to ensure there were enough staff with appropriate competencies and skill set necessary to care for the residents' needs as identified through resident assessments and plans of care. The facility would consider staffing needs for each shift and would adjust as necessary based on any changes to its resident population. The assessment further showed the facility average daily census was 105…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, expired foods were not discarded for 1 of 2 refrigerators, 1 of 1 dry storage areas, and food items in the refrigerator and freezer were not dated when opened. The facility further failed to maintain a clean cooking environment. These failures placed residents at risk for food-borne illnesses. Findings included . <Expired/undated food> During an initial tour of the kitchen on 01/07/2025 at 8:47 AM, the dry storage area revealed a container of French salad dressing and two containers of Caesar salad dressing with no received or expiration date, six cartons of thickened cranberry cocktail that expired November 2024, a bag of coconut that expired November 21, 2024, and twelve containers of a vanilla nutritional drink that expired on 12/28/2024. The refrigerator in the main kitchen contained a bag of brown, wilted salad, two bags of brown wilted lettuce and a bag of spinach that was brown that had no received or expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-17 · tag F0887 — widespreadEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were offered the COVID-19 vaccine (COVID-19, a viral illness that caused fever, difficult breathing, and other viral symptoms that included possible hospitalization or even death), were provided education regarding the risks/benefits and potential side effects of the vaccine, and maintained documentation related to vaccine education, declination,or administration of the vaccine as required for 3 of 3 sampled staff (Staff G, H, and I) reviewed. This failure placed residents and staff at risk of illness or exposure to the COVID-19 virus and potential unintended health consequences. Findings included . The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule 2025 for ages 19 years or older retrieved from www.cdc.gov/acip-recs/hcp/vaccine-specific/ documented adults age [AGE]-64 years or adults age [AGE] or older who were unvaccinated for COVID-19 were recommended to receive 1 or 2 doses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents could file grievances without reprisal or fear of reprisal, report grievances consistent with alleged abuse to the State Survey Agency as required, and repeatedly promptly resolve grievances for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 40, 31, 10, 24), reviewed for grievances. This failure placed residents at risk of feelings of powerlessness, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy title, Grievance Procedure revised November 2016, documented residents and resident representatives were informed of their right to voice a grievance orally, in writing, and anonymously regarding the care and treatment/lack of treatment, behavior of staff and of other residents, and other concerns during their stay. The policy further documented residents had the right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Grievances were to be resolved immediately, when possible. If a grievance involved an allegation of abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure to include the identification of potential allegations of abuse, responding to and reporting the allegation to the State Survey Agency (SA) as required, and thoroughly investigating allegations for 5 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 98, 10, 58, 40, and 31), reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk for abuse, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Corporal Punishment, Involuntary Seclusion, Mistreatment, Misappropriation of Resident Property, and Exploitation, updated [DATE], defined different forms of abuse. The policy defined mental abuse as the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which caused or had the potential to cause the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation. The policy further showed new and existing staff would be trained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care according to the person-centered care plans and provider orders for 4 of 8 sampled residents (Residents 27, 36, 54 and 89 ) reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, Resident 27 was on a fluid restriction and their intake was not monitored or maintained, Resident 36's blood sugar monitoring equipment was broken by staff and was not replced timely, Resident 54 did not have their bowel management medications administered to prevent constipation, and Resident 89 had difficulty swallowing and a Speech Therapy evaluation was not completed timely. These failures placed residents at risk for unintended health consequences and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 36> A review of the 10/25/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 36 had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a Central nervous system disease that caused stiffness, tremors and balance difficulty) and diabetes. The resident was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions timely to prevent weight loss for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 54 and 77) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed the residents at risk for further weight loss and a decline in their health. Findings included . <Resident 77> According to the 11/09/2024 annual assessment, Resident 77 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia and muscle weakness. The assessment further showed Resident 77 showed no signs and/or symptoms of a swallowing disorder. Resident 77's weight was 159 lbs within the last 30 days. Resident 77 was cognitively intact and able to clearly verbalize their needs. Review of the 01/05/2024 initial nutrition evaluation by the Registered Dietician showed Resident 77's weight was 181.6 lbs on 01/04/2024. The assessment further showed Resident 77 was on a regular texture diet with thin liquids and nourishment supplement ordered at bedtime. Resident 77 consumed 75-100% of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete annual staff performance reviews yearly as required and provide education based on the outcome of these reviews for 1 of 5 sampled staff (Staff F), reviewed for performance reviews. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained and/or underqualified care staff, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of Staff F, Nursing Assistant, personnel file showed they were hired on 11/03/2022. The personnel file included a 01/10/2023 verbal warning for not completing training as required and a 07/29/2024 written warning for a verbal altercation with a peer which included use of profanity and threatening language at the nurse's station. No documentation of a performance evaluation was found. In an interview on 01/17/2025 at 12:28 PM, Staff G, Nursing Assistant, stated staff evaluations were done yearly. In an interview on 01/17/2025 at 12:52 PM, Staff E, Registered Nurse, stated staff evaluations were done yearly. In an interview on 01/17/2025 at 12:59 PM, Staff D,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare palatable (acceptable/appetizing) meals for 7 of 10 residents (Residents 10, 28, 31, 35, 40, 50 and 77), reviewed for food palatability.This failure placed the residents at risk for a diminished dining experience, dissatisfaction with food served and a potential for less than adequate nutritional intake leading to weight loss. Findings included . <Resident 77> According to the 11/09/2024 annual assessment, Resident 77 was cognitively intact and able to clearly verbalize their needs. Review of July 2024 through December 2024 grievance log showed Resident 77 filed the following grievances: -09/03/2024 the clam chowder smelled and tasted bad with a 09/04/2024 resolution that the facility switched out soup for a replacement item. Review of a 09/24/2024 provider progress note showed Resident 77 was concerned about their weight loss. The note further showed Resident 77 had a 15-pound (lbs) weight loss in the last six months, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition with muscle wasting in their abdomen, thighs,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene when indicated and follow transmission-based precautions (TBP) when implemented for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 61), reviewed for infection control. This failure placed residents at risk of acquiring communicable diseases and diminished quality of life Findings included . TRANSMISSION BASED PRECAUTIONS Review of the facility policy titled, Transmission-Based Precautions (Isolation) revised March 2024, showed TBP were used whenever measures more stringent than standard precautions were needed to prevent or control the spread of infection. There were three types of TBP (airborne, contact, and droplet). Contact precautions were implemented for residents known or suspected to be infected with microorganisms that could be transmitted by direct contact with the resident or indirect contact with environmental surfaces or resident-care items in the resident's environment. The policy listed infections, including Shingles…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain urinary catheters (a tube inserted into the bladder that drains urine into a collection bag) in a dignified manner for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 36 and 154) reviewed for urinary catheter care. This failure placed the residents at risk for public visualization of their urine and possible embarrassment. Findings included . The December 2000 Evaluation for Indwelling Catheters facility policy documented residents admitted to the facility with an indwelling catheter were evaluated at admission and quarterly for catheter usage. The policy did not address concerns regarding a resident's dignity when catheters were required. <Resident 36> A review of the 10/25/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 36 had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that caused slow, stiff movement, tremors and loss of balance) and kidney disease. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and required substantial assistance of staff for toileting. A further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement the self-administration of medicaiton policy, ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT) determined a residents could self-administer medications, ensure only provider approved medications were kept at the resident's bedside and/or safely and securely stored at the bedside for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 24), reviewed for choices. This failure placed residents at risk of access to unsecured medications, potentially avoidable medication errors and/or accidents, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medication updated September 2017, showed if a resident desired to self-administer medications they would be evaluated using the self-medication evaluation assessment. If a resident was determined to self-administer medications provider orders that specified specific medications to self-administer would be obtained, a self-administration care plan would be implemented, a bedside self-administration record was to be implemented if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, safe and homelike environment for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 23 and 28), reviewed for environment. Specifically, Resident 23's personal refrigerator contained expired foods, and the facility failed to ensure an exit door was in good repair and Resident 28 had a large hole in the wall behind the door to their room. These failures placed Resident 23 at risk for a foodborne illness, and all residents at risk for injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Personal Refrigerators And Foods Brought Into The Center By Family/Visitors dated August 2020, showed temperatures were to be monitored daily and perishable foods covered, labeled, dated and discarded following use by date guidelines on the Food Labeling Reference Guide. The policy further showed center staff may, at their discretion, discard food items that were not safe to eat nor labeled, after verbally notifying the resident and/or the responsible party.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed-hold notice, a notice that informed the resident of their right to pay the facility to hold their room/bed while they were hospitalized , to the resident and/or their representative at the time of discharge, or within 24 hours of transfer to the hospital, for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 54), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for a lack of knowledge regarding the right to a bed-hold, while they were hospitalized . Findings included Per the 12/23/2024 significant change in condition assessment, Resident 54 had diagnoses which included high blood pressure, diabetes, and dementia, and had severe cognitive impairments. Review of Resident 54's record showed a 12/12/2024 nursing progress note which documented the resident had a rapid heart rate and their oxygen level was 74 percent (the normal oxygen level is 90-100). The resident was assessed and was sent to the hospital for evaluation. Additional record review found no documentation that showed the resident had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services that ensured a resident's abilities in activities of daily living (ADLs) did not diminish for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 36) reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure put residents at risk for physical decline and decreased quality of life. Findings Included . The Facility assessment dated [DATE] documented the facility offered cares to residents with various types of needs. Services for Mobility and Fall/Fall with injury Prevention included Restorative Nursing care among others in supporting the resident's independence in doing as many of these activities by him or herself. A review of the 10/25/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 36 had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a central nervous system disorder that caused slow, stiff movements, tremors and balance difficulties) and muscle weakness. Resident 36 was cognitively intact, did not use assistive devices such as a walker or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate assistance during mealtimes for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 90), reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure placed the resident at risk for decreased food and fluid intake, possible unintended weight loss and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Per the 12/17/2024 comprehensive assessment, Resident 90 had diagnoses which included traumatic brain injury (brain damage caused by a sudden forceful bump, blow, or jolt to the head), lack of coordination and muscle weakness. The assessment further documented Resident 90 had no range of motion impairment to their upper extremities, required set-up or clean-up assistance for eating and was cognitively intact for decision making. Review of the 12/09/2024 nutrition care plan showed Resident 90's assistance needs during meals varied from independent up to set -up assistance and instructed staff to refer to physical therapy (PT) and/or occupational therapy (OT) as appropriate. The 12/09/2024 limited physical ability care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently implement a resident's care plan and ensure appropriate treatment and services to restore as much normal bladder and bowel function as possible were received 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 81), reviewed accidents. These failures placed residents at risk for a decline in urinary and/or bowel function, embarrassment, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Per the 11/14/2024 quarterly assessment, Resident 81 had diagnoses including stroke and hemiplegia (muscle weakness on one side of the body). The assessment further showed Resident 81 was dependent for transfers during toileting and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. There was no bowel and bladder training program in place. Resident 81 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the 06/04/2024 self-care deficit care plan documented Resident 81 was dependent for toileting and instructed staff to only use a bedpan to use for toileting. The 08/27/2024 bowel incontinence care plan instructed staff to observe pattern of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bi-level positive airway pressure (BIPAP, a machine that helped people breathe by delivering pressurized air into their lungs through their nose, or nose and mouth) was implemented as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 81) reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed the resident at risk for impaired sleep, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The 11/14/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 81 was moderately cognitively impaired, was able to make their needs known, and had diagnoses which included stroke and impaired ability to move the upper and lower extremity on one side of their body. In addition, the assessment documented the resident was dependent on nursing staff to complete activities of daily living (ADLS) for getting dressed. Review of Resident 81's care plan showed a respiratory care plan was developed on 12/10/2024 to provide interventions to treat the resident's sleep apnea, a condition that caused breathing to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely act upon the pharmacist's monthly medication regimen review recommendations for identified irregularities for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 24), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving unnecessary medications, medication complications, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Regimen Review published March 2019, showed a pharmacist reviewed the resident's medication regimen monthly and report irregularities to the attending physician, medical director, and Director of Nursing (DNS). The pharmacist was to exit with the DNS or designee prior to leaving the facility and email their report of any irregularities, at the end of their visit. The attending physician was to respond to pharmacist recommendations within 2-4 weeks and provide documentation pharmacy recommendations were reviewed. If a change was made, the facility notified the pharmacy and completed the order. According to the 11/16/2024 quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure significant medication errors were prevented when medications ordered by the provider were not supplied and as administered for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 156) reviewed for unneccesary medications. This failure put the resident at risk for a possible decline in their physical and mental well-being and decreased quality of life. Findings included . A review of the 01/01/2025 admission assessment documented Resident 156 had diagnoses including bone infection of the hip, ankylosing spondylosis (causes swelling, joint pain and fatigue), and depression. Resident 156 was cognitively intact, and took antidepressant, antianxiety, and opioid pain medications daily. The resident had a depression screening score of 6 (on a scale of 0 to 27, six indicating mild depression) related to poor appetite, feeling tired, feeling down and depressed, and little interest in doing things. The 12/26/2024 care plan documented Resident 156 used antidepressant medication. Staff were instructed to administer medications as ordered,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff dated multi-dose vials of medications when first accessed or opened, monitored refrigerator temperatures to ensure vaccinations were adequately stored in 2 of 2 medication storage rooms, cleaned 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed for cleanliness, and ensured medications were secured in a resident's room. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication management. Findings included . <Expired Medications> An observation on 01/08/2025 at 2:08 PM with Staff PP, Licensed Practial Nurse (LPN), in the Oak Hall Medication Room identified an undated vial of Tuberculosis screening solution. The plastic cap on the vial's rubber stopper was removed and the vial had been accessed. The box where the vial was stored showed an instruction to the staff to discard the medication after 30 days from being opened.Staff PP stated the medication vial should have been dated when opend and needed to be discarded. This continued medication room observation on 01/08/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff had the required training for 4 of 17 sampled dietary staff (Staff M, N, O and P) reviewed for credentialing. This failed practice had the potential risk for unsafe food handling practices and placed all residents at risk for developing foodborne illness. Findings included . A review of the dietary cards showed Staff P had no Washington State Food Workers card. Staff P had an expired certificate that was not provided. Staff M, N, and O had a certificate from Food Handler Solutions for completing the food handler's course. Review of Food Handler Solutions website, foodhandlersolutions.com/[NAME]-food-handler-card/ showed, the Food Handler Solutions Program was not currently an approved credentialing program in the State of [NAME]. This program was only intended to be used for personal development and preparation for the State provided training. During an interview on 01/14/2025 at 2:24 PM, Staff Q, Dietary Manager,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete, accurate, readily accessible and resident records were safeguarded against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 98), reviewed for accidents. This failure placed residents at risk of having an incomplete medical record, unauthorized access to confidential health information, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility employee handbook related to use of business equipment showed company telephones, computers, tablets, handheld computers, copiers, supplies, and other equipment were to be used for business use. Employees were not allowed to use cell phones or smart phones in resident care areas. Direct care staff were prohibited from using or having their cell phones turned on while on duty and were only to use these items during their meal or break times in non-resident care areas. The handbook further showed all employees were expected to follow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure arbitration (a procedure used to settle a dispute using an independent person mutually agreed upon by both parties) agreement in a form, manner, and/or language understood by the resident and/or their legal representative for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 13 and 88) reviewed for arbitration. Failure to ensure residents had the cognitive ability to understand and enter into an arbitration agreement with the facility, and failure to ensure staff responsible for explaining the arbitration process and offering the arbitration agreement had adequate training, placed the residents at risk of being uninformed of their rights, losing legal protection, the right to pursue legal action, and a diminishd quality of life. Findings included . The facility policy, [NAME] Arbitration Agreement, last updated September 2022, stated the parties understood that any legal dispute, controversy, demand or claim that arose out of or related to the Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3), reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident 3 was at an increased risk for skin breakdown and developed an unstageable pressure ulcer that was not identified while at the facility. This failure placed the resident at risk for worsening pressure ulcer and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility admission assessment, dated 06/16/2024, showed Resident 3 was admitted with diagnoses which included Diabetes and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body). The resident was moderately impaired with decision making. Resident 3 required maximum assistance with bed mobility. The assessment showed the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers, did not currently have a pressure ulcer but had MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage which is inflammation of the skin caused by prolonged exposure of moisture which includes urine or stool). Review of the resident's care plan, dated 06/10/2024, showed Resident 3 was at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promoted resident dignity for 1 of 2 sample residents (Resident 1), reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to dress Resident 1 in appropriate attire before going to an appointment in the community. This failure placed Resident 1 and other residents at risk for embarrassment and diminished self-worth. Findings included . According to the 03/10/2024 facility assessment, Resident 1 had diagnoses which included blindness, a fracture and dementia. The resident was moderately impaired with decision making. Resident 1 required moderate assistance for dressing their upper body, and dependent on staff to dress their lower body. On 04/30/2024 at 09:45 AM, a State Agency representative stated they had received information Resident 1 was not dressed appropriately when they went out for an appointment. The person they spoke to was very upset and stated Resident 1 was in a night gown and had a saturated brief. On 04/30/2024 at 10:15 AM, a Collateral Contact (CC) was interviewed. The CC stated they went…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notification to the resident's representative of a change in condition for 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 2), reviewed for notification of change. This failure prevented the resident's representative from being informed of Resident 2's worsening condition until the resident was being sent to the hospital. Findings included . The 03/04/2024 assessment showed Resident 2 had a spinal cord dysfunction and inability to move their lower extremities. Resident 2 was able to make their needs known. During an interview on 04/08/2024 at 1:50 PM, a Collateral Contact (CC) stated the resident's representative attended a care conference 03/19/2024 and was told Resident 2 was doing well. The CC stated the representative would get several phone calls a day from Resident 2 and those calls stopped, which was a concern. The CC went in to visit the resident and described the resident as listless (lack of energy). The CC stated no one had called and told them the change in the resident. The CC asked staff to have Staff F, facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor and document a condition change for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 2), reviewed for change in condition. This failure placed residents at risk for worsening medical conditions and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of a facility assessment, dated 03/04/2024, showed Resident 2 had a spinal cord dysfunction and was unable to move their lower legs. The resident was able to make their needs known and was dependent on staff for mobility in and out of bed. Review of nursing progress notes from 04/04/2024 through 04/08/2024 showed a note on 04/04/2024 related to the resident being nauseated and had not felt like eating the past few days. There was no further documentation of the resident's condition until 04/08/2024, when the resident was seen by Staff F, physician, and sent to the hospital. Review of a progress note by Staff F dated 04/08/2024, showed the resident was seen for follow-up related to nausea. When the provider went in to see the resident, the resident was lethargic (fatigue and low energy)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident and their representative of a missed medication for 1 of 2 sampled residents (1) reviewed for medication errors. This failure placed the resident and representative at risk of not being fully informed to make decisions about Resident 1's clinical condition and necessary care. Findings included . Per the 02/25/2024 significant change in condition assessment, Resident 1 was cognitively impaired, and had a family member who was involved in their care. Review of a facility investigation, dated 02/13/2024, showed the resident had had not received their Apixaban (a medication used to reduce the risk of blood clots) as ordered. The investigation further showed the resident's family member was not notified of the incident. During an interview on 03/04/2024 at 1:40 PM, Resident 1 and their family member who was Power of Attorney, stated they were unaware that a medication error had occurred. Review of Resident 1's medical record showed no documentation that the resident or their representative was notified of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as ordered for 1 of 2 sampled residents (1) reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for worsening of a deep vein thrombosis (DVT, a blood clot in a deep vein) and adverse health consequences when they missed doses of their medications. Findings included . Per the 01/28/2024 admission assessment, Resident 1 had diagnoses including a right ankle fracture. A review of the hospital admissions records documented Resident 1 was found to have a left lower extremity DVT on 01/31/2024 and had been started on Apixaban at that time. A review of Resident 1's hospital orders dated 02/07/2024, documented Resident 1 was to have Apixaban (a medication used to reduce the risk of blood clots) 10 milligrams (mg) twice daily for 7 doses, then Apixaban 5mg twice daily for 360 doses and the 5mg needed to start on 02/09/2024. A review of Resident 1's order summary documented Resident 1 was to receive Apixaban 10mg twice daily for 7 administrations, then give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide showers for 4 of 5 dependent sampled residents (Resident 2, 3, 4, 5), reviewed for bathing. This failure placed residents at risk for poor hygiene and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 2> Review of a facility assessment, dated 01/11/2024, showed Resident 2 had diagnoses which included a stroke. The resident was alert and able to make their needs known. According to Resident 2's care plan, revised on 08/07/2023, Resident 2 required extensive assistance of one person with showers. The resident was to receive two showers a week. A review of the resident's shower records from 12/19/2024 through 01/25/2024 showed Resident 2 had a shower on 12/19/2023 and 12 days later on 01/01/2024. The resident received a shower on 01/05/2024 and bed bath 7 days later on 01/12/2024. On 01/15/2024 Resident 2 had a bed bath, refused a shower 01/18/2024 and didn't receive a shower until 01/25/2024, 10 days later. During an interview on 01/26/2024 at 12:32 PM, Resident 2 stated they didn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure personal protection equipment (PPE's) was used in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines by 5 staff (A, B, C, D, E), when reviewing infection control practices. This failure placed the 103 residents and staff at risk for contracting COVID-19, a respiratory disease caused by a virus. Findings included . At the beginning of the complaint investigation on 01/25/2024 at 1:00 PM, there were 15 residents that were in isolation for COVID-19. The residents were spread through out the facility on different units. According to the 05/16/2023 CDC publication, How to use your N95 Respirator, N95 masks (a special type of tight-fitting mask that filters particles) must form a seal to the face to work properly. The document showed the mask should be placed under the chin, with the nose piece bar at the top, with the top strap pulled over the head and placed near the crown, and the bottom strap at the back of the neck, below the ears. The straps should lay flat, be untwisted, and not crisscrossed. The document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was used in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines by 15 staff (G, I, M, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, BB, CC, DD, EE, FF, GG), when reviewing infection control practices. This failure placed the 96 residents and staff at risk for contracting COVID-19, a respiratory disease caused by a virus. In addition, the facility's failure to nursing staff performed hand hygiene during wound care for 1 of 5 sample residents (Resident 83) reviewed. this failure placed the resident at further risk of infection and medical complications. Findings included At the time of the entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 8:37 AM, there were 8 residents isolated and positive for COVID-19. Two residents were removed from isolation that morning. Five remaining positive residents were housed on the transitional care unit (TCU), and one resident was housed on the Evergreen Unit. The Oak unit had no further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviewand record review, the facility failed to honor the shower preferences for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 45, 48, and 84), reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). This failure placed the residents at risk for skin integrity concerns and decreased quality of life. Findings included . The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated 05/08/2023, Interim Infection Prevention and Control for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic documented when performing an outbreak response to a known case, facilities should always defer to the recommendations of the jurisdiction's public health authority. At the time of the entrance to the facility on [DATE], there were 8 residents isolated and positive for COVID-19 (a viral illness that caused difficult breathing, cough or other symptoms consistent with viral illnesses). Two residents were removed from isolation the same morning of 09/25/23. Five remaining positive residents were housed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services and medication administrations met professional standards when medications were not able to be re-ordered timely and residents missed multiple doses of their medications for 31 of 41 sampled residents (Residents 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 18, 22, 34, 35, 37, 39, 41, 42, 45, 48, 50, 52, 53, 59, 65, 69, 71, 73, 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 85, 86, and 212) reviewed for significant medication errors. This failure placed the 96 residents at risk for complications in their medical conditions, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Record reviews completed on 09/27/2023 and 09/28/2023 showed that Residents 45, 48 and 71 had not received doses of medications to treat irritable bowel syndrome, blood pressure, viral illness, and mood disorders as the medications were documented as on order from pharmacy. A review of the 07/2023 Incident and Accident (A&I) logs showed that two residents (Residents 3 and 50) had also missed doses of their medications that treated depression. The medications were listed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents did not miss multiple doses of their ordered medications, investigate the causes of the missed doses timely, and educate the staff regarding the medication ordering process for 31 of 41 sampled residents (Residents 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 18, 22, 34, 35, 37, 39, 41, 42, 45, 48, 50, 52, 53, 59, 65, 69, 71, 73, 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 85, 86 and 212) reviewed for significant medication errors. The lack of ensuring the medication system was in place prior to change. This failure placed the residents at risk for complications in their medical conditions, and decreased quality of life. The facility had identified the issues and was in the process of correcting them. Findings included . The 06/2017 revised Medication Administration facility policy documented the nurse was to re-order medications prior to running out of the medication supply. If a medication was not available, the nurse was to document the medication was not available in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify an incident as potential neglect and initial an investigation as required for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 289) reviewed for abuse. These failures placed the residents at risk of further neglect, and unmet care needs. Findings included . The facility's Grievance Procedure, last updated November 2016, instructed staff if the grievance involved abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property, the Executive Director was to be notified immediately, and an investigation started. Review of the facility's Abuse Identification and Investigation polices, last revised October 2022, stated activities that constituted abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property, were to be reported to the Executive Director and an investigation which included the alleged victim, perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegation, was to be completed. The 06/19/2023 admission assessment showed Resident 289 was able to make their needs known, and needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Palm Guards (protective devices to prevent or assist with contractures and skin breakdown) were being used as directed in accordance with the comprehensive care plan for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 21 and 29) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk of skin injuries, worsening contractures, the shortening or tightening of tissues that reduces movement, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 21> According to Resident 21's quarterly assessment dated [DATE], Resident 21 had severe cognitive impairments and diagnoses included contractures to the right and left hand. Review of Resident 21's care plan, dated 04/11/2022, showed the resident needed to wear bilateral palm guards at rest, and removed for discomfort or functional use of hands related to being at risk for skin tears. A physician's order, dated 09/09/2022, stated bilateral palm guards donned at rest and removed per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 residents (Resident 29 and 83), reviewed for respiratory care and treatment, received appropriate oxygen services. This failure placed the residents at risk to receive inappropriate care. Findings included . According to the facility's oxygen administration policy dated December 2017, Oxygen is administered by a physician order. Oxygen may be administered in the absence of a physician order in emergency situations . Oxygen liter flow is set by a licensed nurse in accordance with physician's orders . <Resident 83> According to an admission assessment, dated 05/19/2023, Resident 83 had diagnoses of COPD (lung disease that blocks airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and CHF (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should, which may cause difficulty breathing.) The resident was not using oxygen therapy at that time of their admission. On 09/27/2023 at 09:26 AM, 10/02/2023 at 10:34 AM, 10/03/2023 at 08:40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement a consistent process to ensure 1 of 2 observed potentially hazardous areas (housekeeping closet) was secured. This failure placed cognitively impaired residents at risk of injury. Findings included . Observation on 09/25/2023 at 10:04 AM showed a housekeeping closet at the end of Oak Hall was unlocked, and able to be opened. The room contained chemicals that were harmful if swallowed or contacted the skin or eyes. No residents were wandering by the room. Additional observations of the housekeeping closet with the door left unlocked, without facility staff nearby and directly supervising the area were made at the following dates and times: 09/27/2023 at 9:08 AM and 09/27/2023 at 11:07 AM. In an interview on 09/27/2023 at 11:03 AM, Staff L, Nursing Assistant, stated when they have seen a resident wandering, they redirect them by offering activities. In an interview on 09/27/2023 at 11:07 AM, Staff K, Housekeeper, stated the housekeeping closet must remained locked because the chemicals that are kept in there are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$111,830 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $14,505 — penalty dated 2025-06-09
- $34,356 — penalty dated 2025-04-14
- $54,145 — penalty dated 2024-08-02
- $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-01-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.0 | +2.0 vs chain |
The other 43 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 43; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST 12 LEASED OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| CH PNW 12 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| WITZCORP PNW 12 LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| HERZKA, YISROEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| YENOWITZ, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| WASHINGTON IDAHO PROPERTY, L.L.C. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/17/2025 |
| CURRY, DANIELLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| ODENTHAL, JASON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| COUVE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| PNW 12 OPCO MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| PNW 12 SNF CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| ROYAL PARK HEALTH SNF OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/07/2025 |
| BISHOP, LEIGH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| HARRISON, MICAELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| MCGAUGHEY, MEAGAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| SPIELMAN, SHIMON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $298K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505379. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.