Hot Springs Health & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 30.7 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.70 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.58 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.82 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-12-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly identify, document, and implement physicians' orders and appropriate interventions to treat the resident's conditions in a timely manner. This included a skin condition on the entire buttocks of a resident, which was found to be related to sepsis and UTI due to incontinence, and required IV antibiotics and catheter placement during hospitalization for 1 (#32) of 15 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 12/5/23 at 8:12 a.m., NF1 stated they had concerns for resident #32 from a hospital stay with high blood sugar and burns on her buttocks from sitting in soiled briefs and then discharged AMA to another facility and passed away. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 11:09 a.m., staff member B stated resident #32 had a long history of behaviors, including during blood sugar checks. The blood sugar checks were discontinued because of the behaviors, and resident #32 was no longer taking insulin. Staff member B stated resident #32's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-12-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide scheduled medication, as ordered by the physician, to 1 (#26) of 15 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in undue physical symptoms for the resident. Findings include: During an interview on 12/4/23 at 1:18 p.m., resident #26 stated, They (the facility) ran out of my nausea medication on Sunday, and I didn't get any until Friday. I went through such withdrawals; I was so sick and all they said was it was on order day after day. I had hot and cold sweats, puked for days and that's not right. Review of resident #26's medication administration record showed Promethazine HCl Tablet 25 MG was not given on 11/27/23 through 12/1/23 for the following times: -11/27/23 9:00 a.m.: OO=On Order from Pharmacy -11/27/23 8:00 p.m.: OO=On Order from Pharmacy -11/28/23 9:00 a.m.: OO=On Order from Pharmacy -11/29/23 9:00 a.m.: OO=On Order from Pharmacy -11/30/23 9:00 a.m.: OO=On Order from Pharmacy -12/1/23 9:00 a.m.: OO=On Order from Pharmacy During an interview on 12/6/23 at 8:34 a.m., staff member B stated if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included resident-specific care items and or accurate levels of care required for ADLs for 4 (#s 2, 11, 22, and 28) of 19 sampled residents. The deficient practice placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and at risk for not maintaining their highest practicable level. Findings include:During an interview on 2/9/26 at 8:08 a.m., staff member A stated the facility followed the RAI manual as the care planning policy. Staff member A stated he wasn't sure why some CAAs were not on the care plan.During an interview on 2/9/26 at 10:38 a.m., staff member A stated they are following the new objectives on cutting down on care plans. During an interview on 2/9/26 at 11:52 a.m., staff member C stated the IDT is involved in care planning, but any nurse can update a care plan as necessary. The care plans are updated as individual needs come up for the residents.During an interview on 2/9/26 at 2:26 p.m., staff member A stated he would expect to see the individual needs of a resident on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean bathroom for the resident(s) to use for 1 (#5) of 19 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused the facility to be odorous of urine. Findings include:During an observation on 2/7/26 at 12:39 p.m., the bathroom located outside of resident #5's room had a urine odor. There was what appeared to be urine built up at the base of the toilet. When wiped with a dry white cloth, the cloth became soiled with urine. During an observation on 2/8/26 at 8:20 a.m., the bathroom near resident #5's room smelled of urine, and there was what appeared to be urine built up around the base of the toilet. There was a toilet riser over the toilet, and the lid to the toilet tank was missing. When a paper towel was used to wipe the spot of urine in front of the toilet, the paper towel became soiled with urine.During an observation on 2/8/26 at 10:27 a.m., staff member J was cleaning the bathroom next to resident #5's room. During an observation on 2/8/26 at 11:11 a.m., the bathroom next to resident #5's room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident for the risk of entrapment from bed rails and failed to obtain consent from the resident's POA, prior to installation of grab bars for 1 (#38) of 19 sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to cause an entrapment risk for the resident. Findings include:During an observation on 2/8/26 at 1:11 p.m., resident #38 was sleeping in his wheelchair, in his room, next to his bed. His bed was noted to have two bed rails/grab bars, one on each side of his bed.During an interview on 2/8/26 at 2:56 p.m., staff member A stated resident #38 should not have had bed rails, they were mounted to his bed and should not have been. Staff member A further stated that both bed rails had been removed.During an observation on 2/9/26 at 10:45 a.m., resident #38 was sitting in his wheelchair watching tv and there was a bed rail up on the room door side of the bed.During an interview on 2/9/26 at 10:51 a.m., staff member E stated he had only removed the bed rail on the window side of the bed.During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespread
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and maintain current individualized care plans, to include when a change to the resident's care occurred, for activity preferences, or ensure staff were aware of how to use/find the individualized comprehensive care plans for use, for 6 (#s 1, 3, 6, 10, 20, and 22) of 19 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 12/17/24 at 2:56 p.m., staff member B said she had been at the facility for 14 years, and resident #1's behaviors and care had not changed. Staff member B said all resident care plans were accurate for the residents. Record Review of resident #1's comprehensive care plan showed an admission date of 11/16/2007. Resident #1 had multiple diagnoses identified, including severe intellectual disabilities, bipolar disorder, conduct disorder, unspecified psychosis, unidentified mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and moderate dementia with behavioral disturbance(s). Resident #1 was care planned for behavior of hitting, kicking, scratching, and resistant to cares, with an initiation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed safe food handling practices and ensure staff used proper hair and beard coverings while meals were prepared and served, which may affect any resident receiving meals or meal services from the staff or kitchen. Findings include: During an observation on 12/17/24 at 12:03 p.m., staff member N had a goatee, which was not covered with a beard net, while N was cooking at the stove. Staff member F was working in the kitchen during meal service, installing new equipment, with no hairnet and beard net. Staff member F had long hair, and a long, full beard. During an observation and interview on 12/17/24 at 12:18 p.m., staff member N was plating resident lunch trays without a beard cover in place. Staff member N said he was to be wearing a beard cover when in the kitchen. Record review of a facility policy, Personal Hygiene Standards, updated June 2021, showed: .a. Hair restraining devices (e.g. hair nets), covering all hair, are worn while on duty. Hair restraining devices are provided for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-19 · tag F0837 — widespread
  Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility governing body failed to ensure the facility implemented and operationalized policies and procedures related to Advance Directives, PASARR Screenings, Care Plans, and Accidents/Hazards. This failure increased the risk of any resident in the facility being negatively affected due to the lack policies and procedures. Surveyors identified deficient practices for resident #s (6, 20, 30, and 32.) of 19 residents sampled, and for these specific residents, the facility did not have policies or procedures for the facility or staff to utilize. Findings include: A review of the policies and procedures during the recertification survey, showed the facility failed to develop and operationalize polices for Advance Directives, PASARR Level One and Two screenings, Care planning, and Accidents and Hazards. Advance Directives: During a review of resident #30's POLST, it was found resident #30 had not dated the form, and the physician did not date the form. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 8:44 a.m., staff member B stated the POLST forms are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to take actions aimed at performance improvement, and after implementing those actions, measure its success, and track performance to ensure that improvements were realized and sustained: failed to identify and develope policies and procedures that direct staff on resident care expectations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents within the facility who required complete medical records for medical review, residents who fall, residents who were cared for without accurate comprehensive care plans, and staff direction for resident care. Findings include: During an interview on 12/18/24 at 8:44 a.m., staff member B said the facility did not have the requested policies and procedures to provide the surveyors. Policies and procedures requested; Advance Directives Policy, PASARR Level I and Level II Policy, Care Plan Policy, Significant Change Policy, and a Call Light Safety Policy. During an interview and record review, on 12/19/24 at 9:11 a.m., staff member B stated the facility did not have any active…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were complete for 4 (#s 1, 9, 16, and 30) of 19 sampled residents. This deficiency increased the risk of of the resident's wishes not being met or followed. Findings include: Review of resident #1's POLST, dated 7/8/21, showed a verbal consent by resident #1's guardian. No physical signature by the guardian was present on the form. During a review of resident #9's POLST, dated 4/11/17, showed the physician failed to date the document or complete the provider contact information. During a review of resident #16's POLST, dated 8/25/22, it was found the physician failed to complete the sections labeled, Printed Name of Physician, Date and Time, and Provider Phone Number. During a review of resident #30's POLST, it was found resident #30 had not dated the form, and the physician did not date the form. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 8:44 a.m., staff member B stated the POLST forms are required to be fully completed, including dates. Staff member B stated the facility did not have an Advanced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0711 — pattern
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility physician failed to document resident assessments or physician visits for 4 (#s 1, 4, 6, and 20) of 19 sampled residents. This failure increased the risk of others not having the pertinent medical information available, when needed, to address resident care needs. Findings include: 1. A request was made on 12/17/24 for resident #1's current history and physical. A hospital admission physical, dated 5/5/14, was provided. No current history and physical for resident #1 was located in the resident's electronic medical record. 2. A request was made on 12/17/24 for resident #4's current history and physical, no current history and physical was located in the electronic medical record, or provided by the facility. 3. Review of resident #20's EHR reflected no history and physical had been completed by the physician. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A request for the most recent history and physical completed for resident #20 was made, but nothing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to remove expired medications, and allowed the expired items to remain in the same location as the unexpired medications, which increased the risk of misuse. Findings include: During an observation on 12/19/24 at 8:48 a.m., there were the following expired medications located in the facility stock medication cupboard: - Two bottles of Magnesium Chloride, expiration date of 9/2024, - Three bottles of Ferrous Gluconate, expiration date of 5/2024, - One bottle of Iron 27 mg, expiration date of 4/2024, - Three bottles of Meclizine, expiration date of 7/2024, - One bottle of COQ10, expiration date of 8/2024, and - One bottle of Senna Plus, expiration date of 9/2024. During an interview on 12/19/24 at 8:50 a.m., staff member K stated the process of checking on expiration dates and removing medication was supposed to be done by pharmacy as they maintained the medication supply.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,614 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $22,614 — penalty dated 2023-12-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $71K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MT