Portland Health And Rehabilitation
12441 SE Stark Street, Portland, OR 97233 · For profit - Corporation · 105 certified beds · (503) 255-7040 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $24,827 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-29)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.3% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.2% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 2.0% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.4% | 4.9% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.1% | 20.6% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.9% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.8% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.8% | 5.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.9% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.6% | 13.9% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.7% | 81.2% | 79.4% | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.4%CMS range 43.0–68.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 6.6–17.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 55.2 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.09 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.93 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' change of condition was assessed timely for 2 of 2 residents (#s 8 and 22) reviewed for skin conditions. This failure resulted in Resident 8 experiencing untreated and significant pain, sustaining multiple fractures and receiving treatment at the hospital. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 was readmitted to the facility in 10/2018 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (a severe or complete loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (a mild or partial loss of strength on one side of the body) following a stroke. a. Resident 8's 1/7/24 Quarterly MDS Assessment revealed the resident was usually able to make her/himself understood and understand others, experienced upper and lower extremity impairment on one side of her/his body and required substantial-to-maximal assistance with transfers. A review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed the following: -On 2/25/24 at 6:59 AM a Progress Note written by Staff 34 (Former LPN) indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess for care plan effectiveness, identify and implement new fall interventions or provide adequate supervision needed to prevent falls for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 40, 48 and 108) reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in Resident 108's hospitalization and placed residents at risk for falls and injury. Findings include: 1. Resident 108 was admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with diagnoses including cancer, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, abnormal weight loss, chronic fatigue, and weakness. Resident 108's 9/9/23 admission MDS indicated she/he was cognitively intact and while she/he moved about her/his room and facility, she/he required supervision with the assistance of one other person. The MDS indicated Resident 108 experienced falls prior to admission to the facility. Review of Resident 108's 9/2/23 care plan indicated she/he was a high risk for falls. The care plan directed staff to provide a safe environment free from clutter or spills, adequate and glare-free light, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to effectively respond to resident council concerns expressed at 3 of 3 resident council meetings reviewed for facility response to Resident Council concerns. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs concerning issues of resident care and lessened quality of life. Findings include: The facility's 1/2017 Resident Council Policy revealed the facility was expected to communicate a response and/or decisions to the Resident Council by the next meeting.During the 2/25/26 at 11:08 AM Resident Council meeting the residents stated they did not feel heard about their concerns or suggestions. The Resident Council stated they did not receive a response from administration or departments regarding the concerns or suggestions they reported.A 2/25/26 review of the Resident Council/Family Council Department minutes revealed the following from the Resident Council meetings concerns: -12/12/25, residents expressed concern for food quality, personal money access and no responses were provided to the Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to deliver mail on Saturdays for 1 of 1 Resident Council reviewed. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely written communications. Findings include:On 2/25/26 at 11:08 AM during the Resident Council group interview, residents stated their mail was not delivered on Saturdays.On 2/25/26 at 12:52 PM Staff 23 (Activity Director) stated the MOD (manager of the day) delivered mail on Saturdays.On 2/25/26 at 1:00 PM Staff 3 (RNCM) stated she sometimes worked on Saturdays as the MOD and she never delivered mail to the residents.On 2/25/26 at 1:04 PM Staff 8 (RN) stated he worked as the MOD on Saturdays at times and never passed mail to residents.On 2/25/26 at 1:15 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated he expected the MOD delivered mail on Saturdays and acknowledged there was no other system in place to deliver mail to residents on Saturdays.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor residents and follow physician orders for 6 of 13 sampled residents (#'s 37, 48, 55, 62, 63, and 68) reviewed for abuse, staffing, and death. This placed residents at risk for unidentified concerns and unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. The facility's 9/30/25 Abuse Allegation investigation revealed Resident 37 alleged a resident of the opposite sex entered her/his room on 9/29/25 and touched her/his chest and abdominal region. The investigation identified Resident 68 to be the alleged perpetrator, but the facility was not able to collaborate Resident 37's allegation of abuse. a. Resident 37 was admitted to the facility in 9/2025 with a diagnosis of spinal fracture. Resident 10/1/25 admission MDS revealed she/he had severe memory impairment. Resident 37's Progress notes revealed the following:-9/30/25 during a care conference Resident 37 reported an allegation of abuse and was moved to another room to separate her/him from the alleged perpetrator. -10/1/25 (There was no assessment related to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were secured and accessible only to authorized personnel for 2 of 3 facility halls observed for secure medication cart. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation of medications and adverse medication consequences. Findings include:1. On 2/25/26 at 12:16 PM an unattended medication storage cart in the [NAME] Hall was observed to have unlocked drawers. Two staff members and a visitor were observed to walk past the unlocked medication storage cart. On 2/25/26 at 12:20 AM Staff 10 (RN) opened the closed door in room [ROOM NUMBER], approached the unlocked medication storage cart and locked it. Staff 10 confirmed the drawer had been left unlocked and unattended while she was in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The medication storage cart was inspected, and Staff 10 confirmed the cart contained residents' prescribed medications, insulin vials and insulin needles. Staff 10 confirmed the medication carts were to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement Enhance Barrier Precautions for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 11 and 48) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination. Findings include:1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with a diagnosis of pressure ulcer. Resident 11's 2/26/26 Weekly Skin Evaluation revealed she/he had a pressure ulcer to the left buttock which was first observed on 3/27/25. On 2/25/26 at 10:56 AM Staff 4 (RNCM) was observed to begin pressure ulcer care. Staff 4 performed hand hygiene and put on gloves. Prior to removing Resident 11's dressing, this surveyor asked Staff 4 if she/he was to wear a gown. Staff 4 stated she did not need to wear a gown and only needed to use gloves. Resident 11's ulcer was observed to not have signs of infection. On 2/26/26 at 9:11 AM and 2/27/26 at 12:07 PM Staff 8 (Infection Preventionist) stated residents with chronic wounds that did not have significant drainage were on standard precautions (use of gloves, gowns, masks and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care was provided in a manner that maintained resident dignity for 1 of 7 residents (#67) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for undignified care. Findings include:Resident 67 was admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation in half of the body), depression, and anxiety.An 8/14/25 Annual MDS assessment determined Resident 67 had normal cognitive function.An 8/6/25 facility investigation report included the following statements from Resident 39, Resident 67, Staff 12 (LPN), and Staff 22 (CNA):- Resident 39 was in a shared room with Resident 67 and witnessed the incident. Resident 39 stated Staff 22 entered and exited Resident 67's room loudly. When confronted about slamming the door, Staff 22 and Resident 67 raised their voices at each other to which Resident 67 became upset.- Resident 67 stated Staff 22 was moving quickly around Resident 67's room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist residents to formulate and obtain an advance directive for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 26 and 48) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for healthcare decisions to conflict with resident wishes. Findings include: 1. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses of esophageal obstruction (blockage of esophagus) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 26's clinical record revealed no documentation of an advance directive and no evidence the resident was provided written information regarding the right to formulate one. On 2/26/26 at 8:30 AM, Resident 26 stated she/he had not completed an advance directive and had not been offered the opportunity to formulate one. On 2/26/26 at 1:44 PM, Staff 5 (Business Office Manager/Human Resources) stated residents without an advance directive were offered a blank advance directive during their initial care conference. Staff 5 confirmed Resident 26 had not been offered the opportunity to complete an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were not abused for 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 48, 65 and 66) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse and diminished psychosocial well-being. Findings include:The facility's update 2022 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Corporal Punishment, Involuntary Seclusion, Mistreatment, Misappropriation of Resident Property, and Exploitation Policy statement included each resident has the right to be free from abuse including verbal, physical and sexual. The abuse definition included the willful infliction of intimidation resulting in mental anguish. 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including epilepsy (neurological disorder) and dementia. Resident 65 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including a stroke and depression. Resident 66 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses including heart failure and depression. Review of a 9/25/25 incident report documented on 9/25/25 Resident 6, Resident 65 and Resident 66 tried to exit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess the use of a physical restraint for 1 of 2 sampled resident (#12) reviewed for positioning and mobility. This placed residents at risk for inappropriate use of a restraint. Findings include:Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 1/2021 with diagnoses of stroke and dementia. A 1/14/26 Annual MDS assessment indicated Resident 12 had no physical restraints in place and was able to make herself/himself understood and was able to understand others. A 1/23/26 Morse Fall Scale assessment indicated Resident 12 had a history of falls and exhibited impaired balance while standing. The assessment identified Resident 12 as being at high risk for falls. A 1/28/26 Care Plan indicated Resident 12 had impaired mobility and was at high risk for falls. Planned interventions included placement of the bed against the wall, bed in low position, monitor for seizure activity, and placement of a mattress on the floor next to the bed while the resident was in bed. The Care Plan did not include the use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain a baseline assessment for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unidentified adverse medication side effects. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 11/2025 with a diagnosis of dementia. Resident 2's admission orders included she/he was to be administered Risperdal (antipsychotic medication) and olanzapine (antipsychotic medication).Resident 2's clinical record revealed an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) was not completed until 2/18/26, three months after she/he was admitted to the facility and antipsychotic therapy was initiatedOn 2/24/26 at 12:38 PM Resident 2 was observed without abnormal involuntary movements. On 2/26/26 at 1:09 PM Staff 3 (RNCM) stated an AIMS was to be completed when a resident was first started on an antipsychotic medication and then every six months. Staff 3 acknowledged Resident 2's AIMS was not completed timely. On 2/26/26 at 3:56 PM Staff 2 (DNS) sated if a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse within the mandated timeframe for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 6, 65 and 66) for 1 of 5 FRI reports reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for further abuse. Findings include:The facility's revised 2022 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Corporal Punishment, Involuntary Seclusion, Mistreatment, Misappropriation of Resident Property and Exploitation revealed it was expected for the facility to immediately report all suspected and/or allegations of abuse in accordance with state and federal law. The policy defined immediately to mean as soon as possible but no later than two-hours after an allegation of abuse was made.On 9/26/25 at 11:09 AM, the state agency (SA) received a FRI for a 9/25/25 at 9:00 AM alleged abuse with Resident 6, Resident 65 and Resident 66.On 2/26/26 at12:28 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated on 9/26/25 he completed the FRI and sent it to the SA and he was not aware of any other attempts to contact the SA within the required two-hour timeframe.On 2/26/26 at 12:41…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#62) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for not being informed of their right to return to the facility. Findings include: Resident 62 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with a diagnosis of seizures. Resident 62's 1/26/26 Progress Note revealed she/he sat at the nurse's station, was observed to have tremors, and was unresponsive. Resident 62 was transported to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. Resident 62's clinical record did not have documentation to indicate a bed hold policy was provided to Resident 62 or her/his representative. On 2/27/26 at 11:11 AM Staff 3 (RNCM) stated Resident 62 was not stable when she/he was transported to the hospital. Staff 3 stated she did not notify Resident 62's representative of the bed hold policy. On 2/27/2026 at 11:53 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated the facility residents were not required to pay to hold their bed. All residents were allowed to return from a hospitalization,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 2 and 48) reviewed for pressure ulcer and unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects and worsening wounds. Findings include: 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 11/2025 with a diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbances. Resident 2's 11/2025 MAR revealed she/he was administered olanzapine (antipsychotic medication) for delusions, risperidone (antipsychotic medication) for delusions, and sertraline (antidepressant) for mood disorder. Resident 2's 11/18/25 admission MDS and associated CAA indicated she/he used psychotropic medications but there was no analysis of findings including her/his medical condition, history, and rationale for the continued use of psychotropic medications. On 2/27/26 at 8:59 AM Staff 16 (MDS Coordinator) reviewed the 11/18/26 admission MDS and verified she did not address Resident 2's mental health diagnosis, history or psychotropic medications, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with ADL care for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 12 and 32) reviewed for ADL care. This placed residents at risk for lack of personal hygiene. Findings include:1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 1/2021 with diagnoses of stroke and dementia.Resident 12's Annual MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and grooming.A review of Resident 12's care plan dated 1/19/26 revealed no interventions addressing facial hair removal or grooming preferences. Resident 12 was observed on 2/24/26 at 9:14 AM and on 2/25/26 at 8:55 AM with a significant amount of visible chin hair. On 2/24/26 at 9:16 AM, Resident 12 stated she/he did not want to have facial hair and would like staff to take care of her/his unwanted hair. On 2/25/26 at 10:13 AM, Staff 14 (CNA) observed Resident 12 's facial hair and stated her/his facial hair is really…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide resident centered activities for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#7) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for diminished psychosocial well-being and quality of life. Findings include: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including anxiety and dysphagia following cerebral infarction (difficulty swallowing following a stroke). The 9/25/25 Annual MDS revealed Resident 7 was cognitively impaired, speech was unclear and rarely understood and she/he was dependent on staff for all ADL and mobility needs. Resident 7 enjoyed watching television, to sit in the lobby, listen to music and individualized visits.Resident 7's 10/25/25 Activity Quarterly Progress Note Review revealed she/he enjoyed listening to music, to go outside for fresh air when the weather was good, to watch birds and staff fill the bird feeder outside her/his room window, make phone calls to family, sensory visits and one to one individualized visits. On 2/23/26 at 1:31 PM Resident 7 was observed to lie…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer care was provided to promote healing and physician orders were followed for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 11 and 48) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for delayed healing. Findings include: 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with a diagnosis of osteomyelitis (bone infection) and pressure ulcer. Resident 11's 2/3/26 Order Details revealed her/his ulcer was to be cleaned with wound cleanser, a full package, one gram of collagen powder was to be applied to the wound bed, a calcium alginate sheet was to be lighted packed, and then covered with a border dressing. On 2/25/26 at 10:56 AM Staff 4 (RNCM) was observed to perform pressure ulcer care to Resident 11's sacral pressure ulcer. The care included:-Wound cleanser was applied to clean gauze.-The ulcer periphery and wound bed was cleaned.-The ulcer was dried with clean gauze.-After gloves were removed, hand hygiene was performed, and new gloves were applied. -A collagen sheet was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to perform pre and post dialysis assessments on 1 of 1 resident (#3) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for inadequate monitoring. Findings include:The facility's Dialysis Policy from 3/2025 states the facility provides ongoing monitoring of the dialysis access site and utilizes a Dialysis Flow Sheet to document resident specific dialysis care including monitoring of the catheter and fistula.Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease.Physician orders from 1/29/26 included Resident 3 had a fistula (a connection port used to access blood vessels during dialysis) in her/his chest and she/he was to receive dialysis services three times a week.A 2/9/26 admission MDS cognitive assessment determined Resident to have no cognitive limitations.Review of records from 1/2026 and 2/2026 revealed Resident 3 received dialysis treatment on 1/28/26, 2/9/26, and 2/18/26. No record was found of pre or post dialysis assessments being completed for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident or representative understood an arbitration agreement before signing for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 3 and 21). This placed residents at risk for inability to resolve concerns in court. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with a diagnosis of kidney disease. Resident 3's 1/29/26 State Arbitration Agreement form revealed on 1/29/26 she/he signed to accept the agreement. Resident 3's 2/3/26 admission MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact. On 2/25/226 at 10:33 AM Resident 3 stated she/he was really sick when she/he admitted to the facility and did not recall all events. Resident 3 stated she/he did not know what an arbitration agreement entailed. Resident 3 stated if she/he knew the agreement meant she/he waived her/his right to file a lawsuit, she/he would not have signed the agreement. On 2/25/26 at 10:00 AM Staff 5 (Business Office Manager) stated she reviewed an arbitration agreement with a resident if she/he was cognitively intact and as soon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards and failed to ensure care needs were met for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1, 3 and 5) reviewed for call lights. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 2/2024 for diagnoses including congestive heart failure and surgical aftercare.Resident 5's care plan dated 2/26/24 indicated she/he needed moderate assistance with ADLs such as dressing, bathing, toileting hygiene and transfers.On 3/6/24 the State Survey Agency (SSA) received a complaint which stated Resident 5 had waited over 45 minutes the morning of 3/6/24 for help with personal care.On 7/9/25 at 11:21 AM Witness 1 (Complainant) stated when Resident 5 was at the facility, she/he would activate the call light and CNA staff would come in, turn off the call light and ask what she/he needed. Resident 5 made her/his specific request and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for aspiration precautions for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for respiratory services and aspiration precautions. This placed residents at risk for a lack of nutritional assistance and aspiration. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 7/2025, with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure and congestive heart failure.Resident 6's care plan dated 7/4/25 revealed she/he was on aspiration precautions and required one-to-one supervision for all meals.On 7/10/25 at 1:10 PM, Resident 6 was overheard calling out for staff in her/his room. Upon entering the resident's room, a meal tray with partially eaten food was observed on the resident's bedside table. No staff were observed present in the room with Resident 6. After the state surveyor exited the resident's room, Staff 6 (Speech Therapist) was observed to enter the resident's room and assist the resident to her/his care conference.On 7/10/25 at 1:40 PM, Staff 6 stated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with the opportunity to organize and participate in Resident Council for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Resident Council. This placed residents at risk for a lack of participation in group discussions regarding facility policies, procedures and resident rights. Findings include: The facility's Resident Council policy dated 5/2002 indicated the following: -Resident Council was intended to promote resident interest and involvement in the Center as well as, a forum for residents to voice concerns and to suggest changes. -Resident Council was to meet monthly or at the frequency determined by the Council members. -Resident Council was open to residents of the Center. On 10/23/24 the facility had a census of 55 residents. A review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes revealed the last Resident Council meeting was on 3/20/24. On 10/25/24 at 10:53 AM Staff 14 (Activities Director) stated she was hired in 5/2024. She stated Resident Council meetings did not occur because residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a qualified professional to direct the activities program for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for unmet physical, mental and psychosocial needs. Findings include: The facility's Key Personnel list provided on 10/23/24, indicated Staff 14 was the facility's Activities Director. On 10/28/24 at 9:31 AM Staff 14 stated she was hired in 5/2024 and had minimal experience and no training in developing or implementing an activities program with the adult population residing in a nursing facility. Staff 14 stated she did not receive training when she was hired regarding developing an activities program or how to structure a daily program. Staff 14 stated she pretty much developed the activities program by using resources on the Internet. Staff 14 reported she was given no training or direction on how to work with residents with dementia or those who were unable to speak, and the previous administrator was supposed to enroll her in an activity training course but that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete nurse aide performance reviews every twelve months for 5 of 5 sampled CNAs (#s 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of care by competent staff. Findings include: Review of personnel records found the following employees had not received their annual performance evaluations: -Staff 5 (CNA), hire date 8/31/23: no annual performance review was completed. -Staff 6 (CNA), hire date 5/1/23: no annual performance review was completed. -Staff 7 (CNA), hire date 8/9/22: no annual performance review was completed. -Staff 8 (CNA), hire date 6/14/19: no annual performance review was completed. -Staff 9 (CNA), hire date 6/20/17: no annual performance review was completed. On 10/25/24 at 3:52 PM Staff 11 (Business Office Manager) confirmed annual performance reviews for Staff 5, Staff 6, Staff 7, Staff 8 and Staff 9 were not completed. On 10/28/24 at 12:08 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated his expectation was annual CNA performance reviews would be completed every 12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to properly store laundry to prevent cross contamination for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination and the potential spread of infection. Findings include: On 10/24/24 at 2:22 PM during a tour of the facility's laundry room, a metal rack containing towels, fabric room divider curtains and sheets was observed against the wall opposite from the washing machines. The rack was draped with a cloth sheet that was held in place by metal binder clips. The top of the rack was completely uncovered. Staff 26 (Housekeeping / Laundry) stated the items on the rack were extra, new and clean items. When asked if this section of the laundry room was considered soiled or clean, Staff 26 reported the racks were on the soiled side of the room. She stated the rack had been in the soiled section for as long as she could remember. On 10/25/24 at 8:09 AM the rack with the same items was observed to still be stored on the soiled side of the laundry room. Staff 26 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignified manner and free from a derogatory slur for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#110) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for being treated in a disrespectful manner. Findings include: Resident 110 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with diagnoses including after care for surgical amputation and was assessed as cognitively intact. Review of the 6/15/23 FRI and facility investigation revealed on 6/14/23 Staff 20 (LPN) called Staff 18 (Former DNS) at 6:00 PM to report during the dinner service, Resident 110 overheard Staff 19 (Former Hospitality Aide) use the homophobic slur of faggot in conversation and Staff 21 (Former CNA) observed the comments. Staff 20 reported he interviewed Resident 110 who reported feeling afraid to be at the facility. Resident 110 did not want to be a whistle blower as she/he had experienced similar incidents in the past and she/he was later retaliated against. Staff 18 also interviewed Resident 110 who stated she/he overheard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' bed mattresses were in good repair for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#5) reviewed for restraints and a comfortable environment free from offensive odors for 1 of 1 facility observed for environment. This placed residents at risk for an uncomfortable environment. Findings include: 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 8/2010 with diagnoses including abnormal posture, cognitive deficits and depression. Observations from 10/23/24 through 10/25/24 between the hours of 7:39 AM and 3:30 PM revealed Resident 5's bed mattress had a large divot in the center, covering approximately 3/4's of the entire mattress and was several inches deep. On 10/25/24 at 9:49 AM Staff 5 (CNA) reported Resident 5's bed mattress had a large divot in the center for at least the last year. On 10/25/24 at 10:23 AM Staff 23 (CNA) stated Resident 5's bed mattress was played out, old and needed to be replaced. Staff 23 stated Resident 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 14, 22 and 45) reviewed for communication, dental and ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a respiratory disorder that results in less oxygen entering the blood stream and less carbon dioxide getting out). A review of Resident 14's 7/22/24 Significant Change MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact and had adequate hearing. On 10/23/24 at 10:30 AM Resident 14 was observed interacting with her/his roommate and Staff 27 (LPN) about sharing her/his extra oatmeal. Resident 14 was not able to hear her/his roommate or Staff 27 when they were speaking with normal to elevated vocal intensity. Resident 14 reported, I have to tell them to talk real loud to me. A review of Resident 14's Care Plan revealed no there were no interventions in place to address Resident 14's impaired hearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level II evaluation for residents with a positive Level I PASARR for 1 of 1 resident (#22) reviewed for PASARR. This placed residents at risk for unmet behavioral and emotional needs and a decrease in their quality of life. Findings include: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), depression and panic disorder (an anxiety disorder characterized by unexpected and repeated episodes of intense fear accompanied by physical symptoms that may include chest pain, heart palpitations, shortness of breath, dizziness or abdominal distress). Resident 22's 11/9/22 PASARR Level I identified the resident to have indicators of a serious mental illness. Resident 22's 2/13/23 Quarterly Social Services Evaluation indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activity program for 2 of 3 sampled dependent residents (#s 40 and 48 ) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk of a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life. Findings include: The facility's 5/2002 Specialized Activities Policy indicated the activity staff offered specialized activities to meet the specific resident needs. 1. Resident 40 was readmitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses of diabetes, pneumonia and metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by an underlying illness or organs not working well). Resident 40's 5/2024 (revised on 9/17/24 and 10/22/24) Care Plan revealed the following: -Resident 40 preferred to communicate in Korean. The facility was to provide a translator as necessary to communicate with the resident. -Invite the resident to scheduled activities. -Encourage the resident to go to activities as tolerated. -Encourage the resident to participate in activities that promote…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate and timely pain management for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#22) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for pain. Findings include: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including right upper quadrant pain, low back pain and arthritis. Resident 22's 10/10/24 Annual MDS Assessment and CAAs revealed the resident was able to make her/himself understood and understand others without difficulty, had left hand contractures and received scheduled and PRN pain medication. Resident 22's 10/2024 Physician Orders directed the resident to receive daily wound care to her/his left hand and to administer PRN oxycodone (a narcotic drug used to treat moderate to severe pain) 30 minutes to an hour prior to treatment was provided. The orders also indicated the resident's fingers on her/his left hand were very contracted and painful to move. On 10/23/24 at 11:16 AM Resident 22 was observed in her/his room in bed. The resident's fingers on her/his left hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain necessary services for the behavioral health care needs of residents and review and revise behavioral health care plan interventions to ensure interventions were appropriate and effective for 1 of 1 resident (#22) reviewed for PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review). This placed residents at risk for unmet behavioral health care needs and for not attaining their highest practicable well-being. Findings include: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), depression and panic disorder (an anxiety disorder characterized by unexpected and repeated episodes of intense fear accompanied by physical symptoms that may include chest pain, heart palpitations, shortness of breath, dizziness or abdominal distress). Resident 22's 2/13/23 Quarterly Social Services Evaluation indicated the resident experienced difficulty coping with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the correct POLST was readily available and accessible to enable staff to provide the appropriate interventions for 1 of 5 residents (#42) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for not receiving care per their current wishes. Findings include: Resident 42 admitted to facility in 10/2023 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident 42's 10/5/23 admission MDS indicated she/he was cognitively intact. A public complaint received on 6/4/24 alleged Resident 42 wanted to be full code (all life saaving measures provided). The 6/4/24 public complaint alleged the resident's POLST was filled out incorrectly. Resident 42's clinical record revealed two signed POLST documents. The 10/4/23 POLST for Resident 42 indicated she/he wished to be full code. The 10/27/23 POLST for Resident 42 indicated she/he wished to be Do not resuscitate (DNR). On 10/28/24 Staff 4 (LPN care manager) interviewed resident 42, at which time Resident 42 indicated she/he was to be full code. Staff 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to establish an effective communication process between the facility and hospice provider in order to ensure the needs of the resident were addressed and met 24 hours per day for 1 of 1 resident (#48) reviewed for hospice. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. The facility's 9/2017 Hospice Policy revealed the following: -The hospice and facility communicate, establish and agree upon a coordinated Plan of Care (POC) reflecting the hospice philosophy and based on an evaluation of the individual needs of the resident. -Hospice establishes the POC related to the terminal illness, related conditions, directives for management of pain and other uncomfortable symptoms. -The facility maintains a POC that is consistent with the hospice POC. The plan is reviewed and updated as needed but no less often then quarterly. -The hospice provider is responsible for notifying the facility of changes in provision of care. Resident 48 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including traumatic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a safe and orderly discharge for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#103) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for an unsafe discharge related to medication needs. Findings include: Resident 103 was admitted to the facility on 1/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and cellulitis (a bacterial skin infection) of the lower leg. Resident 103's medication orders included the following medications: -Insulin Glargine-inject 19 units subcutaneously two times a day related to Type 2 diabetes mellitus. -Metformin oral tablet 1000 mg-Give one tablet two times a day for diabetes. -Oxycodone tablet 5 mg-Give 5 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. On 1/31/24, a concern was received which alleged Resident 103 was discharged from the facility with no medications and the resident was an insulin-dependent diabetic. A review of the resident's Discharge Transition Plan dated 1/26/24 revealed none of Resident 103's medications were listed on the discharge form. Resident 103 discharged from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an RN was available for at least eight consecutive hours per day seven days per week for 4 of 68 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely RN assessments and care. Findings include: Review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports from 12/1/23 through 2/6/24 revealed on 12/10/23, 1/2/24, 1/5/24 and 1/11/24, RN coverage was not provided for at least eight consecutive hours per day. On 2/9/24 at 9:55 AM Staff 19 (Staffing Coordinator) acknowledged the facility lacked RN coverage on the identified days. On 2/9/24 at 12:01 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 (DNS) were informed of the findings of this investigation. Staff 2 stated the facility might have RN coverage on the dates identified and the facility would provide additional information by 2/12/24 at 5:00 PM if additional information was found. No additional information was received.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident care needs for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for sufficient staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and lengthy call light response times. Findings include: On 2/7/24 the facility had a census of 56 residents. On 2/8/24 Staff 2 (DNS) provided a list of residents who: -Required two-person mechanical lift transfers: 14 -Required two-person assistance with transferring: 11 -Had behavioral healthcare needs: 20 -Were determined to be at a high fall risk: 15 Observations from 2/7/24 through 2/8/24 from the hours of 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM revealed the following concerns: -2/7/24 at 9:41 AM the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] was activated for 22 minutes and the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] was activated for 17 minutes; -2/7/24 at 9:44 AM the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] was yelling loudly and the roommate was yelling back, shut-up; -2/7/24 at 10:04 AM the call light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Report (DCSDR) postings were complete and accurately reflected actual staff working for 25 of 68 days reviewed for sufficient staffing. This placed residents at risk for incorrect staffing information. Findings include: Review of the 12/1/23 through 2/6/24 DCSDRs indicated the following days when the daily postings were inaccurate or incomplete: December 2023: -12/3/23; -12/4/23; -12/5/23; -12/7/23; -12/22/23; -12/23/23. January 2024: -1/1/24; -1/3/24; -1/4/24; -1/5/24; -1/6/24; -1/7/24; -1/11/24; -1/15/24; -1/16/24; -1/17/24; -1/18/24; -1/19/24; -1/20/24; -1/21/24; -1/25/24; -1/28/24. February 2024: -2/1/24; -2/2/24; -2/3/24. On 2/9/24 at 9:55 AM Staff 19 (Staffing Coordinator) confirmed the facility's failure to accurately complete required information on the DCSDRs.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a well maintained and homelike resident rooms for 2 of 3 halls reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for a non-homelike environment. Findings include: 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 9/2020 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood, ranging from extreme highs to lows). On 7/11/23 at 12:53 PM a large patch of grey scratches measuring approximately one foot by one foot was observed on the wall next to the left side of Resident 11's bed. On 7/17/23 at 9:45 AM Staff 8 (Maintenance Director) stated he completed a walkthrough and necessary maintenance to each resident room on a quarterly basis as part of the facility's preventative maintenance program; however, he stated he was not painting resident rooms at this point on a quarterly basis and it had been a few years since they painted all of the rooms. Staff 8 also stated staff were responsible for adding items and issues in need of maintenance to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident shared equipment was appropriately disinfected for 3 of 3 halls reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for spread of infection. Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website, section titled Transmission-Based Precautions, specified Contact Precautions were used for patients with known or suspected infections that represent an increased risk for contact transmission. Use disposable or dedicated patient care equipment. If common use of equipment for multiple patients is unavoidable, clean and disinfect such equipment before use on another patient. The facility's 5/2015 Cleaning and Disinfecting Resident Care Items and Equipment Policy & Procedure specified reusable resident care equipment was cleaned and disinfected between residents. On 7/12/23 at 11:34 AM room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP: an infection control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-17 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safe self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#29) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: Resident 29 was admitted to the facility in 6/2020 with diagnoses including stroke and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 29's 6/8/23 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident experienced short and long term memory loss and was severely impaired for decision-making. Resident 29's 7/2023 Physician Orders revealed the resident took her/his medications crushed with applesauce. Resident 29's clinical record revealed no physician order and no medication self-administration assessment which indicated the resident was able to safely store and self-administer medications. On 7/11/23 at 11:04 AM a small plastic medication cup was observed on Resident 29's bedside table. The cup contained a plastic spoon and what appeared to be applesauce and chunks of white…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately code the MDS for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 17, 18 and 29) reviewed for positioning and dental. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 2/2016 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of the body) which followed a cerebral infraction (stroke) which affected her/his left side. Resident 18's current physician orders directed staff it was okay for her/him to wear a sling every two hours a day on her/his left hand. The resident was to wear a hand splint daily. Resident 18's 5/13/23 Quarterly MDS, completed by Staff 2 (MDS Coordinator) assessed her/him without the use of a splint or brace. On 7/12/23 at 11:29 AM Resident 18 was observed to wear a brace/splint on her/his left hand. On 7/13/23 at 10:59 AM Staff 17 (CNA) stated Resident 18 usually wore her/his brace/splint several hours a day. On 7/17/23 at 10:18 AM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged Resident 18's 5/13/23 Quarterly MDS was miscoded for the use of a splint or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#35) reviewed for communication. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 35 was admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including diabetes. The 7/2023 care plan indicated Resident 35 experienced an altered communication need she/he only as spoke Korean. The care plan interventions were the following: -Resident preferred to communicate in Korean. -Monitor and document frustration level. -Wait 30 seconds before providing the resident with a word. -Provide a translator as necessary to communicate. Translator is: (blank). -Refer to speech therapy for evaluation and treatment as ordered. The 7/2023 care plan indicated Resident 35 experienced impaired cognitive functioning and directed staff to provide the following interventions: -Ask yes/no questions to determine the resident's needs. -Communicate with the resident/family/caregivers about the resident's capabilities and needs. -Use interpreter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#9) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 9/2022 with diagnoses including depression. Record review revealed Resident 9 weighed 223.8 pounds on 2/14/23. On 7/11/23 she/he weighed 199.8 pounds which was a 10.72% weight loss. The 3/8/23 Nutrition Note revealed a Registered Dietitian referral was completed. The report indicated Resident 9 was referred due to weight loss and a significant change. The weight loss was related to a decreased food intake. Resident 9's 6/7/23 Quarterly MDS indicated a BIMS score of 2 (severe impairment) and no weight loss or weight gain over the past quarter. A 7/13/23 Nutrition Hydration Skin Committee Review Form indicated Resident 9 was reviewed for weight loss. During an interview on 7/12/23 at 2:55 PM Resident 9 was oriented to self, person, place and time. Resident 9 recalled she/he lost and gained weight recently and was unable to describe the reason…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure Staff 12 (LPN) adhered to professional nursing standards related to provision of medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#150) during a medication administration observations. This placed residents at risk for not receiving ordered medications. Findings include: OAR [PHONE NUMBER] Scope of Practice Standards for Licensed Practical Nurses specified the board recognizes that the scope of practice for the licensed practical nurse encompasses a variety of roles, including but not limited to: Under the clinical direction of the RN or other licensed provider who has the authority to make changes in the plan of care, and applying practical nursing knowledge drawn from the biological, psychological, social, sexual, economic, cultural and spiritual aspects of the client's condition or needs, the Licensed Practical Nurse shall implement the plan of care by: - Implementing treatments and therapy, appropriate to the context of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Resident 29 was admitted to the facility in 6/2020 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (a severe or complete loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (a mild or partial weakness or loss of strength on one side of the body) following a stroke. Resident 29's 9/22/22 ADL Self-Care Performance Deficit Care Plan revealed the following: - Nail care per licensed nurse. The resident was diabetic. - Report to licensed nurse if the resident was in need of nail care. Resident 29's 6/8/23 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident experienced short and long term memory loss, was severely impaired for decision-making and required extensive assistance from one person with dressing, personal hygiene and bed mobility. Resident 29's 7/2023 Physician Orders indicated diabetic nail care was to be performed by a licensed nurse weekly. The licensed nurse was instructed to document if the nail care was completed, not needed or refused. A review of Resident 29's 6/2023 and 7/2023 TARs related to nail care revealed the following: - 6/8/23: Resident refused. - 6/15/23: Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an activity care plan and failed to include residents in group and individual activities for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 26 and 35) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for isolation and lack of social interaction and engagement. Findings include: 1. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility in 7/2019 with diagnoses including a stroke, dementia, and anxiety. Resident 26's 4/26/23 Quarterly MDS indicated her/his cognition was moderately impaired and was dependent on staff for care needs. The 4/27/23 Activity Quarterly Review revealed Resident 26 enjoyed music on her/his phone, TV (television)/movies and to watch the birds out of her/his window. Resident 26's 7/2023 care plan directed staff to provide assistance and escort her/him to activity functions. Resident 26's preferred activities were the following: individual visits, art, music, outdoors, animals, TV, movies and the outdoors. On 07/11/23 at 11:21 AM a gardening group activity was scheduled on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for skin issues and positioning. This placed residents at risk for lack of necessary treatment. Findings include: 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 9/2020 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood, ranging from extreme highs to lows). Resident 11's 4/20/23 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident experienced short and long term memory loss and was moderately impaired in decision-making. Resident 11's 7/2023 Physician Orders revealed the following order dated 6/28/23: - Soak right great toe twice daily and as needed in warm, soapy water or warm wash cloth and paint with betadine for ingrown toenail until resolved. - Okay to use cotton or dental floss underneath nail. - Contact podiatry to evaluate in house. - Notify for worsening drainage. On 7/11/23 at 12:48 AM Resident 11 was observed wincing in pain. Resident 11 stated she/he had an ingrown toenail on her/his right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range in motion for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#29) reviewed for position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for worsening contractures (a permanent tightening of the muscle, tendons and skin causing the joint to shorten and stiffen) and conditions. Findings include: Resident 29 was admitted to the facility in 6/2020 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (a severe or complete loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (a mild or partial weakness or loss of strength on one side of the body) following a stroke. Resident 29's 6/13/20 Nursing Evaluation indicated the resident had contractures in her/his left arm. Resident 29's 6/20/20 admission MDS ADL Functional/Rehabilitation Potential CAA indicated the resident had left hemiparesis, right upper extremity weakness and contracture of the left hand. Resident 29's 9/20/20 Nursing Evaluation indicated the resident did not have contractures.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor physician-ordered fluid restrictions for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#250) reviewed for dialysis care. This placed residents at risk for complications related to dialysis. Findings include: The facility's Fluid Restriction Worksheet Policy outlined the following procedure for residents on a fluid restriction: - List total fluid restriction ordered per physician in cc (cubic centimeters) per 24 hours. - Ask Nursing how much fluid is needed for medication passes in cc per 24 hours. - Subtract number two from number one to determine amount of fluid left for Dietary distribution. - Visit resident to determine preferences for fluid distribution by Dietary. Indicate cc of fluids to be provided at each meal and any other times. - The completed form is placed in the Dietary section of the Medical Record. A copy is placed in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the resident. The Dietary Manager also keeps a copy for his/her records. - Care plan is updated to reflect fluid restriction.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were seven errors out of 26 opportunities resulting in a 26.92% error rate. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication effects. Findings include: The facility 6/2017 Medication Administration Policy & Procedure specified the following: - The nurse signs for the medication after administration; - If the medication is unable to be administered, the nurse signs their initials, circles them and documents on the MAR/TAR the reason for non-administration. 1. Resident 150 was admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including cellulitis (skin infection). Resident 150's 7/2023 Physician Orders included the following medications: - Allopurinol 300 mg by mouth one time a day for gout (inflammation of the joints); - amlodipine besylate 10 mg one time a day for atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat); - aspirin delayed release 81 mg by mouth one time a day for blood clot prevention; - Centrum Performance vitamin one tablet by mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-17 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide routine dental services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#17) reviewed for dental care. This placed residents at risk of unmet dental needs. Findings include: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including cutaneous abscess (a pus-filled bump on or below the skin) of the buttock. Resident 17's 5/18/23 Quarterly MDS indicated she/he was cognitively intact. On 7/11/23 at 2:38 PM Resident 17 was observed to be edentulous (without natural teeth) and stated she/he discussed her need for dentures with Staff 5 (Social Services Director) four or five months ago and continued to wait for an update. On 7/13/23 at 12:42 PM Staff 5 stated she submitted a request to the resident's case manager to update her/his dental coverage to include dentures. Staff 5 stated the resident's case manager advised her to have the resident call the case manager to confirm she/he wanted the coverage changed. A review of the Resident 17's medical record revealed Staff 5 submitted a request to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records were accurate related to medication administration for 1 of 7 sampled residents (#150) reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate health records. Findings include: 1. Resident 150 was admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including cellulitis (skin infection). Resident 150's 7/2023 Physician Orders included the following medications: - Allopurinol 300 mg by mouth one time a day for gout (inflammation of the joints); - Centrum Performance vitamin one tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement; - Finasteride 5 mg by mouth one time a day for overactive bladder; - cholecalciferol (vitamin D) 2000 units by mouth two times a day for supplement; - Preservision AREDS by mouth two times a day for supplement. Resident 150's 7/2023 MAR directed the following times each medication was to be administered: - Allopurinol 300 mg at 8:00 AM; - Centrum Performance vitamin at 8:00 AM; - Finasteride 5 mg at 8:00 AM; - cholecalciferol (vitamin D)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were offered and received the pneumococcal vaccination according to Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 8 and 11) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for acquiring pneumonia. Findings include: The 2/2023 CDC Pneumococcal Vaccination website, section titled, Pneumococcal Vaccination, indicated the following: - Vaccines help prevent pneumococcal disease which is any type of illness caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria. There are two kinds of pneumococcal vaccines available in the United States: * Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV13, PCV15 and PCV20) * Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) - CDC recommends pneumococcal vaccination for adults [AGE] years old and older; - Adults 65 years or older who have previously received PCV13 should receive PCV20. a. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 11/2011 with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$24,827 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $24,827 — penalty dated 2024-10-29
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 43 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 43; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS (OR) LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| PORTLAND SNF OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/18/2025 |
| CH PACIFIC NORTHWEST HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| WITZCORP GLOBAL LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| HERZKA, YISROEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| YENOWITZ, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| CEPEDA, MYLENE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| ODENTHAL, JASON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| COUVE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/31/2025 |
| OREGON SNF CONSULTING LLC (DE) | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST OPCO MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| CEESAY, BASIRU | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| DEZEMBER, DUFFY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| MORRIS, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| SPIELMAN, SHIMON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $168K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385228. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.