Hillsboro Health And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 96 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 58.0 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.21 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.85 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 6 and 10) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include:Resident 6 admitted 1/2025 with diagnoses including dementia.Resident 6's 6/9/25 MDS revealed Resident 6 had a BIMS of 5, which indicated a severe cognitive impairment.A 6/9/25 Sexual Capacity Evaluation indicated Resident 6 did not have sufficient memory and/or cognitive function to make the choice for sexual activity.Resident 10's 1/29/25 MDS revealed Resident 10 had a BIMS of 8, which indicated a moderate cognitive impairment.A 6/9/25 Sexual Capacity Evaluation indicated Resident 10 did not have sufficient memory and/or cognitive function to make the choice for sexual activity.On 8/11/25 at 1:04 PM, Staff 20 (CMA) stated she saw Resident 6 sitting on Resident 10's bed on 6/9/25. She stated Resident 10 was touching Resident 6's breasts and was offering Resident 6 money. She stated staff separated Resident 6 and Resident 10.On 8/11/25 at 1:07 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 6 and 10) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include:Resident 6 admitted 1/2025 with diagnoses including dementia.Resident 6's 6/9/25 MDS revealed Resident 6 had a BIMS of 5, which indicated a severe cognitive impairment.A 6/9/25 Sexual Capacity Evaluation indicated Resident 6 did not have sufficient memory and/or cognitive function to make the choice for sexual activity.Resident 10's 1/29/25 MDS revealed Resident 10 had a BIMS of 8, which indicated a moderate cognitive impairment.A 6/9/25 Sexual Capacity Evaluation indicated Resident 10 did not have sufficient memory and/or cognitive function to make the choice for sexual activity.On 8/11/25 at 1:04 PM, Staff 20 (CMA) stated she saw Resident 6 sitting on Resident 10's bed on 6/9/25. She stated Resident 10 was touching Resident 6's breasts and was offering Resident 6 money. She stated staff separated Resident 6 and Resident 10.On 8/11/25 at 1:07 PM, Resident 10 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#5) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injury due to accidents. Findings include:Resident 5 admitted in 7/2025 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side.Resident 5's 7/18/25 care plan indicated Device: Seat belt-gait belt from home and Mobility Device: Electric wheelchair, assist resident with seat belt.A 7/20/25 progress note indicated Resident 5 was found on the floor, stated she/he slid out of her wheelchair and called emergency from her/his personal cell phone. Resident 5 had a laceration on her/his leg and was bleeding. Resident 5 was taken to the hospital for evaluation.On 8/8/25 at 12:28 PM, Staff 12 stated Resident 5 slipped out of her/his wheelchair and onto the floor. He further stated he could not get Resident 5's seat belt around her/him because it was too small. He was unsure if use of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a resident centered care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a lack of meaningful, purposeful and preferred activities and unmet psychosocial needs. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses including dementia. The 3/1/25 Annual MDS assessed Resident 1 with a BIMS of three, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS Activity Preferences section indicated she/he found reading materials and the news somewhat important to her/him. Music, animals, going out in the fresh air and doing her/his favorite activities were very important. The 3/25/25 Activity Progress Note: Annual Review evaluation indicated Resident 1 was independent with activities and did not get out of bed. Resident 1 enjoyed The Daily Chronicle (flyer which provides reading, puzzles, coloring pages and other reading activities) and talking to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide the necessary care and assistance to maintain good grooming and hygiene for 1 of 4 sampled resident (#43) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for poor grooming. Findings include: Resident 43 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (a medical disorder that occurs when your kidneys cannot properly balance bodily fluids) and ataxia (impaired muscle control that can affect walking, balance and the coordination of hand movements). A review of Resident 43's 5/3/25 admission MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact and required supervision or touching assistance to complete personal hygiene tasks. Resident 43's care plan dated 4/28/25 revealed she/he received maximal/substantial assistance with showers on Sunday and Wednesday evenings and required supervision/touch assistance for grooming and personal hygiene. On 5/19/25 at 11:04 AM Resident 43 was observed to have a thick cluster of dark hairs growing from her/his chin.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to respond to a change of condition and provide respiratory interventions timely for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (# 41) for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for respiratory distress. Findings include: Resident 41 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation. The facility undated Standing Orders for oxygen indicated the goal of supplemental oxygen was to maintain saturations above 89% for residents with COPD. The orders indicated oxygen may go up to 2 liters before the provider was to be urgently notified. The 10/30/23 Care Plan directed staff to monitor Resident 41 for difficulties breathing and signs or symptoms of acute respiratory insufficiency. A Facility Report Incident indicated at 7:00 AM on 12/16/24, Resident 41 was found to have oxygen saturations of 64%. Resident 41's oxygen saturations were checked an additional two more times which were below 70%. Staff 5 (CNA) informed Staff 9…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct weekly skin observations and evaluations to identify pressure ulcers and administer treatments timely treatment for 1 of 3 sampled resident (#359) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for complications related to unavoidable skin breakdown and not receiving care to treat pressure ulcers in a timely manner. Findings include: Resident 359 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disorder which primarily affects the brain and leads to cognitive decline) and diabetes mellitus. A review of Resident 359's 3/18/24 admission MDS revealed she/he had severe cognitive impairment, had pressure ulcers, was at risk for the development of additional pressure ulcers and was dependent on staff for bed mobility. The Pressure Ulcer/Injury CAA indicated the facility provided Resident 359 with a pressure relieving mattress for her/his bed to minimize the pressure on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate dosing of opioid medications for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#45) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for complications related to narcotic medications. Findings include: Resident 45 was admitted in 3/2025 with diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver (severe liver disease) with ascites (abnormal build-up of fluid in the space between the organs and the lining of the abdomen). Resident 45's 4/17/25 physician order indicated the resident was to be administered two tablets of oxycodone (opioid pain medication) every four hours as needed for pain levels of eight to 10 out of 10. Resident 45's 5/2025 MAR indicated the resident was administered two tablets of oxycodone when her/his pain levels were less than eight as follows: -5/1: for pain levels of 6 and 7. -5/2: for pain levels of 5 and 6. -5/3: for pain levels of 4 and 5. -5/4: for pain levels of 5 and 6. -5/5: for a pain level of 6. -5/8: for pain levels of 4 and 5. -5/7: for a pain level of 7. -5/8: for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for homelike environment. This placed residents at risk for adverse health conditions and an unclean environment. Findings include: Observations of the facility's general environment and residents' rooms from 2/5/24 through 2/9/24 identified the following issues: -Dirty floor vents inside the beauty shop, outside the beauty shop, outside of rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. -Four dime sized holes on the wall next to the timeclock. -One brown water stained ceiling tile in the main dining area near the kitchen entrance, two brown water stained ceiling tiles outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. -Gouged/damaged walls with paint missing behind resident beds in Rooms 109, 114-1, 114-2, 208-2, 312 and 315. -Lights not working on Hall 100 outside rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], Hall 200 outside rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], and Hall 300 outside the therapy room. -room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door had missing pieces of wood leaving…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 4 of 8 sampled residents (#s 32, 34, 36 and 42) reviewed for choices, care plans and medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 36 was admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, GERD (acid reflux), hypertension (high blood pressure) and chronic congestive heart failure (heart condition which can result in rapid weight gain from fluid build-up). a. Resident 36's 1/17/24 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. On 2/5/24 at 9:24 AM Resident 36 stated she/he received her/his Rybelsus (diabetic medication) late everyday. Resident 36 stated the medication was supposed to be taken before breakfast and staff brought it with the rest of her/his medications after breakfast. Resident 36's 2/2024 Physician Orders included Rybelsus 7 mg everyday for diabetes mellitus 2. The order included the following instructions: - Must be given 30 minutes before first…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $173K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR