Windsor Health And Rehabilitation
820 Cottage Street NE, Salem, OR 97301 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (503) 399-1135 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Feb 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $20,910 in federal fines (most recent 2026-07-13)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.5% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.9% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.3% | 2.0% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.8% | 4.9% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 2.4% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 36.1% | 20.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.0% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.1% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 5.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.3% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.5% | 13.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 54.1% | 81.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.5% | 21.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.3% | 16.1% | 12.0% | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 43.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.2–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 26.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 47.7 residents a day — about 48% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.21 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-07-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#32) reviewed for behavior. This failured resulted in Resident 32 continuing to experience untreated mental health symptoms, including expressing statements of wanting to die and socially isolating her/himself. Findings include:Resident 32 admitted to the facility in 4/2026 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder.A 4/30/26 admission MDS revealed Resident 32 had a score of 19 on the Patient Health Questionaire-9 (an assessment of depression symptoms), which indicated she/he had moderately severe depression symptoms. Resident 32 indicated she/he had thoughts of being better off dead or hurting her/himself 12 to 14 days out of 14 days; felt down, depressed or hopeless 12 to 14 days out of 14 days;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-07-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to staff a registered nurse for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week, for 18 out of 34 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet assessment needs. Findings include:A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports dated 6/3/26 through 7/6/26 revealed there were 18 days without 8 consecutive hours of registered nurse coverage on any shift in a 24 hour period on the following dates: 6/3/26, 6/4/26, 6/8/26, 6/9/26, 6/10/26, 6/15/26, 6/16/26, 6/17/26, 6/18/26, 6/22/26, 6/23/26, 6/24/26, 6/25/26, 6/29/26, 6/30/26, 7/1/26, 7/2/26, and 7/6/26. On 7/7/26 at 5:19 PM, Staff 18 (LPN) stated Staff 2 (DNS) did not work the floor. On 7/8/26 at 10:43 AM, Staff 2 confirmed she was not scheduled to work the floor on days when there were no RNs scheduled. Staff 2 stated she was only available three hours daily to complete resident assessments as an RN due to DNS obligations. Staff 2 acknowledged the requirements for RN coverage in the facility were not met. On 7/8/26 at 12:33 PM, Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide personalized individual and independent activities for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 7, 9, and 33) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for unmet physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including seizures and history of TIA (mini stroke). An 8/5/25 Activity Evaluation indicated Resident 7 preferred independent and one-to-one activities. The 2/6/26 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 7 indicated it was very important to do her/his favorite activities. Resident 7's 6/1/26 Revised Care Plan identified she/he enjoyed listening to music and watching TV or movies, had impaired psychosocial well-being, and was visually impaired. The 7/2026 Activity Calendar revealed planned sessions of one-to-one visits every Wednesday at 4 PM. No documentation was found in Resident 7's electronic health record that indicated the resident was offered or participated in independent or one-to-one activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to have adequate staff available to meet the needs of residents in a timely manner for 1 of 2 halls (South Hall) reviewed for sufficient staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 6/2026 with diagnoses including diabetes, dysphasia (difficulty swallowing) and pressure ulcer. Resident 2 resided on the South Hall. An undated Meal Delivery Times document indicated breakfast was delivered to the South Hall at 7:30 AM and at 7:45 AM to the dining room. An undated Residents that Smoke document indicated the approximate supervised smoking schedule was from 6:30 AM to 7:00 AM, 10:00 AM to 10:30 AM and 1:00 PM to 1:30 PM on day shifts. The 6/18/26 admission MDS revealed Resident 2 had a BIMS score of 5 which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A 6/25/26 revised Care Plan revealed Resident 2 required two staff to assist with transfers, one staff to assist with dressing, and the resident was to dine in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining dental services for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 7, 10, and 43) reviewed for dental services. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including seizures and history of TIA (mini stroke). On 7/6/26 at 1:43 PM Resident 7 stated her/his teeth were disintegrating. Resident 7 pulled back her/his lips to show her/his teeth, and the resident was observed to have several teeth missing on the top and bottom. Resident 7 stated she/he was supposed to have a dental appointment earlier in the year, but the visit did not occur and was not rescheduled. No documentation related to dental services was found in Resident 7's electronic health record. On 7/9/26 at 10:58 AM Staff 6 (Social Services Director) acknowledged Resident 7 had a dental appointment scheduled for 2/17/26, but it was cancelled for an unknown reason. Staff 6 further acknowledged the cancelled dental appointment was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-13 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were fully informed and understood the binding arbitration agreement for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 2, 33, and 53) reviewed for arbitration. This placed residents at risk for being uninformed regarding their legal rights. Findings include:1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 6/2026 with diagnoses including adjustment disorder and paranoid schizophrenia (mental illness). A 6/15/26 BIMS assessment revealed Resident 2 had a score of 5 which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A State Arbitration Agreement dated 6/15/26 revealed Resident 2 signed the document.Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed the resident had a durable Power of Attorney (person appointed to make financial decisions) who was not family.During interviews on 7/8/26 at 1:35 PM and 7/13/26 at 12:50 PM, Staff 30 (Admissions) stated she had family present when Resident 2 signed the Arbitration Agreement and was unaware on 6/15/26 the resident had a POA when the resident signed the document. Staff 30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions, failed to disinfect reusable resident equipment between residents, and failed to ensure staff implemented proper hand hygiene while assisting residents for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for exposure to infections and illness from cross contamination. Findings include: The facility's 8/2025 Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy indicated hand hygiene is performed as soon as feasible after hands become contaminated, such as after contact with mucous membranes and/or body fluids or excretions, and after handling/transporting soiled linen. The facility's 3/2025 Standard Precautions policy indicated reusable resident-care equipment is not used for the care of another resident until it has been appropriately cleaned. 1. On 7/7/26 at 1:51 PM Staff 16 (CNA) and Staff 18 (CNA) were observed to exit room [ROOM NUMBER] with a mechanical lift (a device…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess for self-administration of medications for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#31) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment for chest pain and shortness of breath. Findings include:Resident 31 was admitted to the facility in 6/2026 with diagnoses including asthma and angina pectoris (temporary chest pain, pressure, or discomfort that happens when your heart muscle isn't getting enough oxygen-rich blood).A review of physician orders revealed a 6/12/26 order for nitroglycerin (a medication used to treat chest pain) as needed for chest pain and a 6/12/26 order for albuterol inhaler (a fast-acting rescue medication that quickly relaxes tight muscles around the airways in your lungs) as needed for difficulty breathing or shortness of breath.On 7/6/26 at 2:11 PM, Resident 31 stated she/he requested to self-administer her/his nitroglycerin and albuterol but was informed that she/he could not self-administer while in the facility. Resident 31 expressed concern related to extended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to allow resident self-determination related to smoking for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 31 and 32) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life. Findings Include:A review of the Resident Smoking Safety Policy revealed no evidence relating to the number of cigarettes residents were allowed to smoke during their 20-minute smoking break.1. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility in 6/2026 with diagnoses of cervical spondylosis with myelopathy (age related arthritis of the neck/spine).On 7/6/26 at 1:57 PM, Resident 31 stated she/he was allowed to smoke during the 20-minute smoke breaks, but she/he felt like the facility treated the residents who required supervision while smoking, like children by allowing them two cigarettes only during each smoking break. Resident 31 stated she/he wanted to be allowed to smoke as many cigarettes as she/he wanted during the 20-minute smoke break.On 7/9/26 at 10:09 AM, Staff 29 (CNA) was observed with the residents who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure residents could meet in private for 1 of 1 resident council meeting reviewed for resident rights. This placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life. Findings include: On 7/8/26 at 11:00 AM, Resident Council took place in the dining room with this surveyor and four residents, including Resident 43 and Resident 15. During the Resident Council meeting, which lasted approximately 30 minutes, staff entered the dining room without knocking four different times.On 7/9/26 at 9:33 AM, Resident 15 stated during their monthly Resident Council staff interrupted often.On 7/9/26 at 10:07 AM, Resident 43 stated during their monthly Resident Council Meeting, staff interrupted the meeting multiple times. Resident 43 stated when staff interrupted the meeting, she/he lost her/his train of thought.On 7/9/26 at 10:13 AM, Staff 15 (Activity Director) stated staff were expected to allow the residents to have a private Resident Council meeting. Staff 15 state she was aware staff interrupted the staff have interrupted the Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure non-psychotropic PRN medication was administered prior to psychotropic medication as ordered for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of psychotropic medication. Findings include:Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 1/2024 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder and heart failure. The 10/16/25 Significant Change MDS and related CAAs revealed Resident 8 elected hospice services on 10/12/25 due to a decline in health and heart failure. Resident 8 received psychotropic medications to address her/his hallucinations and anxiety.A 3/16/26 signed hospice physician order indicated Resident 8 was to receive lorazepam (antianxiety medication) every four hours as needed and to use albuterol (fast acting medication for shortness of breath) first.The 6/2026 and 7/2026 TARs revealed Resident 8's albuterol was not administered prior to the resident's lorazepam on 6/4/26, 6/16/26, 6/20/26, and 7/1/26. On 7/8/26 at 1:56 PM, Staff 25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to safely store narcotics for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#70) reviewed for safe medication storage. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation of their narcotic. Findings include:Resident 70 was admitted to the facility in 3/2026 with diagnoses including a fractured left femur (thigh bone) and a fractured left humerus (upper arm bone)On 7/10/26 at 10:15 AM Witness 5 (Complainant) stated two months ago Resident 70 was moved from the North Hall to the South Hall and there was a card of oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) missing. Witness 5 stated the card was located a few days later behind a picture frame in the North Hall.On 7/10/26 at 3:34 PM, Staff 4 (LPN) stated a couple of months ago she was counting medications with the night shift nurse and discovered Resident 70 was a card of oxycodone. Staff 4 stated the nurse manager was immediately notified.A 4/27/26 investigation indicated a card of Resident 70's oxycodone was missing on 4/25/26 and was found a few days later behind the back of a picture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-13 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge for 1 of 2 sample residents (#60) reviewed for discharge planning. This placed residents at risk for unmet discharge needs and failed discharge. Findings include: Resident 60 admitted to the facility in 2/2026 with diagnoses including femur fracture.A 2/14/26 admission Skin/Wound Evaluation revealed Resident 60 had a stage 2 pressure wound to her/his right buttock.A 3/12/26 Face to Face/Discharge Orders revealed the facility requested orders for Resident 60 to have home health physical therapy and occupational therapy. Home health nursing services were not included in the orders.A review of the 3/2026 TAR revealed a 3/15/26 order to clean sacrum wound with wound cleanser, pat dry and apply medihoney to wound bed and cover with a bordered dressing daily and prn.A 3/16/26 Progress Note revealed Resident 60 discharged from the facility on 3/16/26.A 3/16/26 Discharge Summary/Plan of Care/Recapitulation of Stay evaluation revealed Resident 60 had a pressure injury to her/his buttock and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-13 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct a Significant Change MDS assessment within the required timeframe for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#51) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include: Resident 51 admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses including dementia.A 6/19/26 Election of Hospice Benefit form revealed Resident 51 admitted to hospice services on 6/19/26.On 7/10/26 a Significant Change MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not yet completed, 22 days after Resident 51 admitted to hospice.On 7/10/26 at 2:08 PM Staff 38 (MDS Coordinator) confirmed Resident 51's Significant Change MDS was not yet completed. On 7/13/26 at 10:55 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated a Significant Change MDS assessment was to be completed within 14 days of Resident 51's start on hospice services.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately complete a diabetic baseline care plan for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of diabetic care and monitoring. Findings include: Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 6/2026 with diagnoses including diabetes. The 6/18/26 admission MDS revealed Resident 8 received insulin. The 6/2026 and 7/2026 TAR revealed no monitoring for adverse reactions to insulin administration were in place. A 6/25/26 revised care plan revealed no diabetic focus or interventions for Resident 2. On 7/8/26 at 2:43 PM, Staff 18 (LPN) stated a Resident Care Manager was to verify orders for new residents and ensure all treatments, orders, and monitors were in place. Staff 18 stated she believed no treatments were missing for Resident 2. On 7/8/26 at 4:55 PM, Staff 25 (CNA) observed Resident 2's care plan and confirmed she was not able to identify Resident 2 was a diabetic which was important for the monitoring of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar levels). On 7/13/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide ROM for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#16) reviewed for decreased ROM. This placed residents at risk for contractures. Findings include:Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including flaccid hemiplegia (complete lack of movement) of the right side following a cardiovascular accident (stroke).On 7/6/26 at 10:00 AM Resident 16 stated she/he was unable to move her/his right side and Resident 16 stated staff did not assist her/him with ROM exercises.A 5/12/25 revised Care Plan indicated Resident 16 was to receive ROM in the morning and evening.A review of Resident 16's chart revealed no documentation of ROM exercises being completed.On 7/10/26 at 10:04 AM Staff 27 (CMA) stated she never saw ROM exercises being completed with Resident 16.On 7/10/26 at 10:21 AM, Staff 29 (CNA) stated there was no time to complete ROM exercises with residents.On 7/10/26 at 11:19 AM, Staff 21 (CNA) stated Resident 16's extremities were moved when they got her/him dressed but ROM exercises were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate supervision during meals for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#58) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for choking and aspiration. Findings include:Resident 58 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including lung cancer and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A 1/17/26 SLP progress note indicated Resident 58 needed distant supervision while eating. A review of Resident 58's current care plan indicated no information related to the provision of distant supervision while eating. A 5/4/26 facility investigation indicated Resident 58 was eating without supervision and the 1/17/26 recommendation for distant supervision while eating was never put in place for Resident 58. On 7/10/26 at 11:13 AM, Staff 37 (RN) stated Resident 58 had difficulty swallowing. Staff 58 stated distant supervision meant staff needed to keep the residents within line of sight while the residents were eating. On 7/10/26 at 11:16 AM, Staff 21 (CNA) stated Resident 58 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders for respiratory care, an individualized respiratory care plan, and ongoing respiratory monitoring and assessment were in place for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for breathing difficulty. Findings include:Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses including COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease- a lung disease that restricts airflow and makes breathing difficult) and respiratory failure. Physician Orders dated 1/30/26 indicated Resident 4 used a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure- a device that blows a steady stream of pressurized air into your airway through a mask) machine while sleeping, but if she/he removed the CPAP, or refused to wear it, then the facility was to implement supplemental oxygen. The order further indicated the resident was to be on room air (natural breathing with no supplemental oxygen) when awake. The 2/11/26 Care Plan reiterated the same information as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dialysis (a procedure which removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly) services were in place including communication with the dialysis provider for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#46) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for dialysis complications and delayed treatment. Findings include: Resident 46 admitted to the facility in 6/2026 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease.A 6/26/26 Care Plan revealed resident 46 had dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays.A review of Resident 46's Pre Dialysis Evaluation and Post Dialysis Evaluations from 6/24/26 and 7/8/26 revealed the following days when the facility did not have a Pre Dialysis or Post Dialysis Evaluation:-6/26: no Pre Dialysis Evaluation was completed;-7/1: no Pre Dialysis Evaluation was completed;-7/6: no Pre Dialysis Evaluation or Post Dialysis Evaluation was completed;-7/8: no Pre Dialysis Evaluation was completed.A 7/3/26 Progress Note indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the call light was accessible for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This placed residents at risk for the inability to call for assistance. Findings include:Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (chronic condition where the heart is unable to pump blood effectively, leading to fluid buildup in the lungs and other body parts) and weakness.A review of Resident 10's 2/27/26 admission MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact.A 2/26/26 Facility Reported Incident (FRI) reported Resident 10 received a bed bathe on 2/23/26 on the evening and the call light was not accessible to the resident until the next morning. Resident 10 reported no one checked in on her/him throughout the night and the resident needed to use the toilet.On 3/17/26 at 10:08 AM Staff 6 (CNA) stated she checked on Resident 10 on 2/24/26 at approximately 7:40 AM and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide pain medication as ordered for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for pain management. This placed residents at risk for worsening discomfort. Findings include:Resident 7 admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with diagnoses including right tibia and fibula fracture with an external fixator (device to stabilize fracture from the outside using pins, clamps and rods) and diabetes.The 10/23/25 physician order indicated Resident 7 was to receive oxycodone 5 MG every four hours as needed for pain.On 10/27/25 a public complaint was received by the State Agency which alleged the facility ran out of Resident 7's pain medication on 10/25/25 and Resident 7 had requested pain medication prior to a physical therapy session on 10/27/25.The 10/29/25 admission MDS Pain CAA revealed to administer pain interventions per provider orders.A review of the 10/2025 TAR revealed Resident 7 reported a pain level of nine on 10/27/25 at 6:00 AM.A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by staff for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#103) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include:Resident 103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation and respiratory failure. The resident was on hospice services.Resident 103's Physician Order dated 11/4/25 included to administer morphine sulfate 0.25 ml by mouth every hour as needed for shortness of breath and/or moderate to severe pain.On 11/5/25 at 4:57 AM, Resident 103's Progress Note indicated the resident had a period of COPD exacerbation, was groaning, had difficulty breathing and was complaining of being thirsty.On 11/5/25 at 6:29 PM, Resident 103's Progress Note indicated the resident was having difficulty swallowing and all tablet medication would be held. The resident was distressed, had rapid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from involuntary seclusion by staff for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 104) reviewed for involuntary seclusion. This placed residents at risk for mistreatment. Findings include:Resident 104 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses including hip fracture and dementia. Resident 104's 12/2025 Care Plan did not include interventions to keep the resident at the nurse's station all night to prevent falling. On 12/12/25, the State Survey Agency received a call from Witness 1 (Former Staff). Witness 1 stated on 12/6/25 she was notified that Staff 6 (LPN) forced Resident 104 to stay up in her/his wheelchair most of the night on 12/5/25. The resident was kept at the nurse's station up until around 2:00-2:30 AM when staff provided the resident with incontinence care. Staff refused to get the resident back out of bed because Resident 104 made multiple requests to go to bed and the resident did not usually stay up at night. Staff 6 got Resident 104 back up and took the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse or neglect were reported timely for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 103 and 104) reviewed for abuse reporting. This placed residents at risk for continued abuse and neglect. Findings include:1. Resident 103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation and respiratory failure.Resident 103's Physician Order dated 11/4/25 included to administer morphine sulfate 0.25 ml dose by mouth every hour as needed for shortness of breath and/or moderate to severe pain.On 12/12/25, the State Survey Agency received a public complaint by Witness 1 (Former Staff), which reported on 11/6/25 Staff 7 (LPN) was assigned to Resident 103's care and had refused to administer the resident's ordered pain medication even when staff members were reporting the resident was exhibiting screaming, shortness of breath, and very anxious behaviors. Witness 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of potential abuse and neglect for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#103 and 104) reviewed for abuse investigations. This placed residents at risk for continued abuse and neglect. Findings include:1. Resident 103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation and respiratory failure.On 12/12/25, the State Survey Agency received a public complaint by Witness 1 (Former Staff), which reported on 11/6/25 Staff 7 (LPN) was assigned to Resident 103's care and had refused to administer the resident's ordered pain medication even when staff members were reporting the resident was exhibiting screaming, shortness of breath, and very anxious behaviors. Witness 1 stated she was not told about the incident when it occurred, so she was not able to investigate the incident. Witness 1 stated Staff 1 (Administrator) was aware of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 10 and 11) reviewed for physician orders. This placed residents at risk for a delay in treatment and adverse medication side effects. Findings include: 1. Resident 10 admitted to the facility in 2/2017, with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease. Resident 10's 9/10/24 Physician Order revealed an order for a right hand x-ray. Resident 10's 10/8/24 Physician Assistant Encounter Note indicated her/his 9/10/24 x-ray was negative for a fracture. Resident 10 continued to have pain and limited range of motion. Repeat x-rays were ordered on 9/18/24 and 9/24/24, but were not completed. Resident 10's 10/10/24 Hospital Records revealed a right wrist fracture. On 7/2/25 at 9:50 AM, Staff 1 (Resident Care Manager) acknowledged the facility did not obtain Resident 10's right hand x-ray per physician orders on 9/8/24 and 9/24/24. 2. Resident 11 admitted to the facility in 9/2024, with diagnoses including kidney failure. Resident 11's 9/29/24 Physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff wore appropriate hair restraints during meal preparation for 1 of 1 facility kitchen reviewed for sanitation. This placed residents at risk for unsanitary foods. Findings include Review of the US FDA Food Code 2022 revealed: -food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food. On 3/12/25 at 11:43 AM Staff 18 (Cook) was observed plating meals without wearing a hair restraint. Staff 4 (Dietary Manager) was asked what the expectation was for hair restraints during tray line meal service and she stated Staff 18's hair was less than a half inch so there was no requirement to wear a hair restraint. The facility policy for hair restraints was requested. On 3/12/25 at 1:41 PM Staff 4 stated she reviewed food code and confirmed staff with hair of any length were to have a hair restraint in place.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 2 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#s 9 and 12) reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of competent staff. Findings include: A review of personnel records on 3/14/25 indicated the following employees had not received their annual performance evaluations: -Staff 9 (CNA), hired dated was 12/5/22 and the last performance review was completed on 1/10/24. -Staff 12 (CNA), hired date was 5/26/16 and the last performance review was completed on 6/8/23. On 3/14/25 at 10:23 AM PM Staff 2 (Director of Nursing) confirmed annual performance reviews were not completed for Staff 9 and Staff 12.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to include residents in the developient of the comprehensive care plan for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 15, 32, and 42) reviewed for care planning. This placed resident at risk for lack of a comprehensive care plan. Findings include: 1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes. A review of Resident 15's medical record revealed there was a care conference completed with Resident 15 on 1/31/25. On 3/10/25 at 9:48 AM Resident 15 stated no one discussed medication or treatment changes with her/him and she/he did not have a care planning meeting. On 3/12/25 at 10:10 AM Staff 16 (Interim Social Services) stated she completed a 72 hour care meeting with residents on admission, but the facility did not do a care planning meeting with residents after the initial comprehensive MDS was completed. On 3/14/25 at 9:25 AM Staff 17 (Interim MDS Coordinator) stated she assisted in development of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for removal of the a catheter for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#42) reviewed for urinary catheter. This placed residents at risk for increased infections. Findings include: Resident 42 admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including hip fracture. A 2/6/25 Hospital Discharge Order for Resident 42 revealed she/he had a urinary catheter in place and included orders for the facility to attempt removal of the catheter one week from the date of discharge from the hospital. A 2/7/25 Progress Note from Resident 42's provider revealed she/he had an indwelling foley catheter in place, a trial of voiding was to be attempted when the acute symptoms improved, and the facility was to refer Resident 42 to an outpatient urologist for further evaluation and recommendations. A review of the medical record revealed no documentation a urology referral was made or attempted and no documentation of an attempt to remove Resident 42's catheter. On 3/10/25 at 2:11 PM Resident 42…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete IV dressing changes for 1 of 1 resident (#39) reviewed for antibiotics. This placed residents at risk for IV site infections. Findings include: Resident 39 was admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including an abscess (a pocket of pus that forms when the body is fighting off an infection) of the abdominal wall. A review of Resident 39's Physician Orders revealed a 3/6/25 order for zoxyn (an IV antibiotic) every 6 hours. A review of Resident 39's Physician Orders revealed an unscheduled order for PICC line (a central IV line inserted peripherally) care per protocol and next change was due 1/27/25. On 3/14/25 at 9:28 AM Staff 13 (LPN) stated she did not change Resident 39's PICC dressing, as it did not come up on the MAR to change the dressing. Staff 13 stated she did not know how often PICC dressings were to be changed. On 3/14/25 at 10:51 AM Staff 3 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated PICC dressing changes were to be done weekly and as needed. Staff 3 stated she could not find when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were decreased as ordered 1 of 5 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings include: Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 7/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes. A review of Resident 2's physician orders revealed a 9/26/24 order to for Trazodone 150 mg; this order was discontinued on 12/31/24. A 10/21/24 Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber recommended the facility reduce Resident 2's Trazodone 150 mg dose to Trazodone 100 mg. The provider responded on 11/5/24 with an order to reduce Resident 2's Trazodone to 100 mg. A review of the physician orders revealed the facility failed to implement the order for Resident 2 until 1/1/25. On 3/12/25 at 4:00 PM Staff 2 (DNS) reviewed the 10/21/24 Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber and confirmed the order to reduce Resident 2's Trazodone to 100 mg was not implemented until 1/1/25.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication rooms were free of expired biologicals for 1 of 2 sampled medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for diminished treatment efficacy. Findings include: On 3/14/25 at 9:09 AM two medications were observed to be expired in medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER]. The expired medications included healthy eyes(Leutin), and terbinafine (antifungal medication). On 03/14/25 at 9:09 AM Staff 13 (LPN) confirmed Terbinafine x 3 and Healthy eyes w/ Luten were expired and should not be given to residents. On 3/14/25 at 9:38 AM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed the medication was expired and was not to be given to residents.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control practices for wound care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for wound infections. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 2/2017 with diagnoses including diabetes. A review of Resident 6's Physician Orders revealed a 3/5/25 order for wound care to Resident 6's buttocks. On 3/11/25 at 11:00 AM Resident 6's dressing change to her/his buttocks wound was observed with Staff 14 (LPN). Staff 14 completed hand hygiene, donned gloves, cleaned the wound, removed contaminated gloves, applyed new gloves without completing hand hygiene first, applyed medihoney (an ointment for wound healing), applyed a clean dressing, removed gloves, and then completed hand hygiene. On 3/11/25 at 11:09 AM Staff 14 acknowledged she did not complete hand hygiene when she changed her gloves during wound care. Staff 14 stated she completed hand hygiene at the beginning and end of a dressing change. On 3/11/25 at 11:20 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were offered pneumonia vaccines for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for vaccinations. This placed residents at increased risk for pneumonia. Findings include: Resident 10 admitted to the facility in 12/2024 with diagnoses including hypertension. A review of Resident 10's medical record revealed she/he was eligible for, but was not offered, a pneumonia vaccine. On 3/13/25 at 11:11 AM Staff 2 (DNS) was asked to review Resident 10's pneumonia vaccine. Staff 2 reviewed the medical record and stated there was no indication the pneumonia vaccine was administered prior to admission or offered after admission to the facility.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control standards for 1 of 2 halls reviewed for transmission-based precautions and medication administration. This placed residents at risk for cross-contamination and spread of infection. Findings include: 1. Resident 4 readmitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease. The 11/13/23 progress note indicated Resident 4 tested positive for COVID. On 11/16/23 at 8:00 AM Staff 3 (CNA) was observed standing in the hallway behind Resident 4. Resident 4 was in her/his wheelchair in front of her/his door. Resident 4 was observed wearing an N95 mask. Staff 3 was observed wearing a surgical mask and was not wearing an N95 mask, a face shield, a gown, or gloves. The sign on Resident 4's door indicated staff were to wear an N95 mask, a face shield, a gown and gloves for resident care. Resident 4 entered her/his room independently and Staff 3 put on PPE prior to going into her/his room. Staff 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$20,910 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $20,910 — penalty dated 2026-07-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS (OR) LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| CH PACIFIC NORTHWEST HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| WINDSOR SNF OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/13/2025 |
| WITZCORP GLOBAL LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| HERZKA, YISROEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| YENOWITZ, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| CEPEDA, MYLENE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| ODENTHAL, JASON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| COUVE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/13/2025 |
| COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/04/2025 |
| OREGON SNF CONSULTING LLC (DE) | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/04/2025 |
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST OPCO MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/04/2025 |
| CABANEROS, CECILLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| HENNING, TRACEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| MORRIS, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| SPIELMAN, SHIMON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $102K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 385224. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.