North Cascades Health and Rehabilitation
4680 Cordata Parkway, Bellingham, WA 98226 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 122 certified beds · (360) 398-1966 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (97) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $295,969 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-04)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.8% | 14.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.1% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.1% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.8% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.0% | 22.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.7% | 15.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 82.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.4% | 19.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.3% | 13.4% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.96 | 1.33 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.50 | 1.52 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 220 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 99 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.3%CMS range 55.1–65.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 6.4–12.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.9–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 105.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
97 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 77 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff immediately performed Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) to 2 of 2 residents (Residents 1 & 2) who were found unresponsive (not breathing and without a pulse) and had a physician order to initiate CPR. Resident 1 had a signed POLST (Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment- a form indicating the resident's wishes to have or not have CPR) for life-sustaining care and services, facility staff were unable to locate Resident 2's POLST after they became unresponsive. The failure to train staff on the facility's expectation how to respond to a resident who required CPR, locate for immediate reference a resident's POLST/Advanced Directives, and accurately assess signs of irreversible death, resulted in staff not performing CPR for both residents, and placed other current residents who may need CPR at risk of not receiving life sustaining treatment and/or full medical interventions in an emergency, constituted in an Immediate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who engaged in smoking were assessed for adequate supervision to prevent injury from burns, provided a safe environment, necessary devices, and supplies to safely smoke, and to protect other residents from potential fire hazard for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 66 and 78) reviewed for smoking. These failures potentially placed all residents at risk for injury related to unsafe smoking practices and constituted an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). The failed practice resulted in an IJ on 01/16/2025 when the facility failed to ensure residents, and the resident environment were safe from injury from burns and fire. The IJ was removed on 01/17/2025 after the facility-initiated safe smoking evaluations, skin assessments for burns and room inspections to ensure cigarette butts had been properly disposed of for Residents 66 and 78. A safe smoking location was provided with a safe disposal receptacle. Residents 66 and 78 were educated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from sexual abuse by a staff member for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to recognize and report the allegation immediately to protect the resident from the potential further abuse. This failure allowed the alleged perpetrator to continue to work with other residents and allowed them to still have access to Resident 1. Resident 1 who had a known history of domestic violence, was a victim of a home robbery by a past caregiver, experienced psychosocial harm when they experienced increased panic attacks, a change in their sleeping pattern and increased anxiety related to fear of the staff member. This failure placed residents at risk for potential sexual abuse, psychological harm, and a diminished quality of life.Finding included.Review of the facility policy titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Corporal Punishment, Involuntary Seclusion, Mistreatment, Misappropriation of Resident Property,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that was free from accident hazards over which the facility has control for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls. Resident 1, who had a known history of falls experienced harm when the facility failed to safely administer medications which resulted in cumulative adverse effects contributing to a fall with a significant injury. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled: Fall Management and Neurological Check, with a revised date of January 2025, stated care plans were updated to reflect individualized interventions to reduce falls and a systematic review of current interventions was completed post fall and root causes identified. Resident 1 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure, chronic kidney disease, heart failure) and vision deficit. Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was assessed as at high risk for falls.Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls were free from significant medication errors. Failure to follow physician ordered medication parameters for antihypertensive (blood pressure lowering) medications resulted in harm when Resident 1 experienced dizziness and a fall resulting in significant injury. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration Guidelines, dated 01/23 stated prior to administration of medication, review and confirm the orders for each individual medication. Resident 1 admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure) chronic kidney disease and congestive heart failure. Resident 1 had a history of falls. Review of Resident 1's physician's orders showed the resident had orders for:A diuretic (furosemide) (medication that lowers blood pressure by removing fluid from the body) once per day at 11:00 AM. The order instructed the nursing staff to hold the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff monitored, assessed, and implemented interventions to prevent the occurrence of avoidable pressure ulcer/pressure injuries (PI) for 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for PI. Resident 1 experienced harm when they developed an avoidable Stage 3 pressure PI to their rib area and two avoidable unstageable PI's to their sacrum. This failed practice placed all other residents at risk of the development of a PI. Findings included . The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) PI definition and stages of PI's include: -A PI is localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. The injury can present as intact skin or an open ulcer and may be painful. The injury occurs as the result of intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination with shear. The tolerance of soft tissue for pressure and shear may also be affected by microclimate (the skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor a resident for significant weight loss, notify the physician/responsible party, provide nutritional supplements timely, assistance with meals, and meal alternatives when the meals were consumed at less than 50% for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 39) reviewed for weight loss. The facility failed to recognize Resident 39 experienced harm when they had significant weight loss of 12.3% in 4 months (calculated from their weight on 11/05/2023 to their 03/07/2024 weight). These failures placed all other residents at risk for unrecognized weight loss and decline in their nutritional status. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Weights, revised 06/10/2021, showed the facility used weights as a component to evaluate the resident's nutritional status . Any weight of a 5-pound (lb.) variant the resident must be re-weighed within 24 hours .if there was a significant variance they would document in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 6) reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. The failure to provide incontinence care to a resident who was identified to be incontinent of bowel and bladder and required staff assistance for toileting assistance from the day shift staff (approximately for six hours and 23 minutes) prior to being discharged from the facility. This resulted in psychological harm for Resident 6 in the form of mental anguish and embarrassment, (applying the reasonable person approach), when they experienced urine incontinence on a paratransit bus and when they arrived home and placed other residents at risk for experiencing embarrassment and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Corporal Punishment, Involuntary Seclusion, Mistreatment, Misappropriation of Resident Property, and Exploitation, updated October 2022,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services according to professional nursing standards for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for unwitnessed falls. The facility failed to identify a possible neurological injury (injury to that effects the head, brain, and spine) when the resident presented with multiple episodes of elevated blood pressures beyond their base line, after an unwitnessed fall where the resident had head trauma. The facility failed to appropriately notify the provider after the resident had an unwitnessed fall that caused head trauma, and failed to notify the provider that there was a delay in treatment of a physician's order to obtain x-rays for the resident after they had three consecutive unwitnessed falls that resulted in head trauma, increased neck pain and a decline in the resident's condition. Resident 1 experienced harm when they were found to have a Type three cervical (C) fracture [(Dens Fracture) an unstable fracture of the second cervical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety and mobility interventions were provided as directed in the care plan for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 1 and 2) reviewed for falls. This failure caused harm to Resident 1, who experienced a fall when assisted with a one-person transfer that resulted in a fracture, Resident 2 at risk for injury when a fall occurred during ambulation with a nursing assistant, and placed residents at risk for a fall with potential injury. Findings included . <RESIDENT 1> Resident 1 admitted to the facility 12/22/2022 with diagnoses which included heart failure, diabetes, and cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 1's care plan, revised 02/17/2023, showed they were at risk for falls and required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers. Review of progress note, dated 08/22/2023, showed Resident 1 was being transferred in their room by Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and the resident was not moving their feet, then the resident stated, I'm falling. Staff C lowered the resident to the ground. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify and report a potential allegation of abuse and/or neglect for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) and failed to report results of abuse and/or neglect investigations within 5 days for 3 of 3 resident investigations (Residents 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report unexplained bruises found on Resident 1's arms, legs and torso and failed to report the results of a resident to resident (Residents 2 and 3) abuse allegation. This failure placed the residents at risk of further abuse, psychological distress, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Corporal Punishment, Involuntary Seclusion, Mistreatment, Misappropriation of Resident Property, and Exploitation, updated March 2025, documented the facility will report immediately all suspected and/or allegations of abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents, misappropriation of resident property,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations for 1 of 3 resident investigations (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse, and/or neglect. The failure to conduct thorough investigation into unexplained bruises to a resident placed all residents at risk for repeat incidents, potential injury, and unmet care needs. Findings included.Findings included. Review of the facility policy titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Corporal Punishment, Involuntary Seclusion, Mistreatment, Misappropriation of Resident Property, and Exploitation, updated March 2025, documented the facility will conduct a thorough investigation of potential, suspected and/or allegations of abuse and neglect and injuries of unknown source in accordance with federal and state regulations. Resident 1 admitted to the facility 06/10/2026 with diagnoses that include developmental delay since childhood, depression, and pain. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 06/16/2026 showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-13 · tag F0628 — widespreadProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed hold at the time of transfer to the hospital for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 10, 14, 33 and 52) reviewed for hospitalizations and bed holds. This failure placed the residents and/or representatives at risk of not having the necessary information to make an informed decision regarding their ability to return to the facility, Findings included .Review of facility policy titled Bed hold policy, dated April 2025, documented in section 5.2: Bed Holds. The Community will provide a bed hold notice in accordance with applicable regulations and discuss the bed hold note (if applicable) with the resident and responsible party of the time of transfer to an acute hospital. <RESIDENT 14>Resident 14 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include anoxic brain damage (a severe, often permanent, acquired brain injury), diabetes, and pain. Review of Resident 14's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-13 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment addressed the physical environment, equipment, services, and other physical plant considerations that are necessary to care for its identified resident smoking population. Failure to thoroughly assess all factors associated with resident smoking placed residents at risk for adverse events related to smoking safety. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Smoking Safety ., updated January 2025 stated no smoking was allowed on the facility grounds, including parking lots, except in designated areas smoking areas were provided with metal cannisters for the disposal of smoking materials .smoking areas were provided with a portable properly rated fire extinguisher and a suitable number of code compliant smoking aprons. Resident who was assessed were required to safely store their smoking materials in a locked box in their room or lockable mailbox type container outside. In an observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-13 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespreadHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure smoking policies were implemented in accordance with applicable Federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety. Failure to ensure smoking areas were in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act which prohibits blocking handicapped parking spaces, and Revised Codes of the State of [NAME] which prohibits smoking within 25 feet of facility entrances or windows that open, impacted parking accessibility and created the potential for smoke intrusion into the facility. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Smoking Safety . updated January 2025 stated no smoking was allowed on the facility grounds, including parking lots, except in designated areas. In an observation on 04/07/2026 at 11:00 AM, the facility had two handicapped accessible parking spaces in the front parking lot to the left of main entrance to the building. A pop up canopy style tent was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were reviewed promptly and thoroughly resolved with supporting documentation to prevent reoccurrences for 9 of 15 Residents (Residents 30, 47, 57, 65, 79, 95, 105, 122 and 124) reviewed for grievance process. The failure to resolve grievance concerns caused the uncertainty of the resident and/or resident representative receiving necessary care and services, having a diminished quality of life, and not being able to voice concerns with some type of resolution.Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Grievance Procedure Policy, updated March 2025, documented the administrator was the designated grievance official and oversees the procedures. grievances were resolved immediately when possible and when not possible routed to the grievance official promptly. If the grievance involved abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property the Administrator was notified immediately and an investigation would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 4, 6, 13, 18 and 104) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) as required. The facility failed to monitor and document behaviors and symptoms, and failed to document non-pharmacological interventions, and effective use of medication. These failures placed the residents at risk for medication-related complications and for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medication. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Psychoactive Medication, dated June 2025 documented behavior monitoring is initiated to identify problem behaviors and specific behavior interventions are placed on the behavioral monitor for documentation by staff prior to initiation of psychoactive medications.if there are behavioral changes an evaluation is completed and documented as to cause of behaviors, alert charting, notification to all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the level one Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- assessment/a federal requirement for Medicaid-certified nursing facilities to ensure individuals, especially those with mental illness, seeking admission are appropriately placed and receive necessary services) were referred and followed up on for 5 of 6 residents (Residents 11, 13, 73, 82 and 104) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet mental health services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .<RESIDENT 82> Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, and unspecified psychosis. Review of Resident 82's Level 1 PASRR dated 02/22/2026 showed the resident was positive for a serious mental illness with indicators marked for mood disorders (depression), schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder. The service needs section documented there was no need for a Level 2 evaluation at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised as needed for 5 of 9 sampled residents, 2 of 6 (Resident 56 and 105) reviewed for accidents, 2 of 3 (Resident 41 and 84) reviewed for skin issues, and 1 of 6 (Resident 46) reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet needs, decreased quality of care related to outdated or inaccurate care plans, and a diminished quality of life.<ACCIDENTS> <RESIDENT 56> Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include convulsions (episodes of uncontrollable shaking, jerking, or stiffening of the muscles), Parkinson's disease (a slow, progressive brain disorder that impacts movement), polyneuropathy (dysfunction of multiple nerves often causing numbness, tingling, or weakness, typically starting in the hands and feet) and anxiety. Review of Resident 56's admission minimum data set (MDS - as assessment tool), dated 02/18/2026, documented severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient qualified staff to provide care and services for 18 of 23 sampled residents (Residents 1,6, 9, 19, 28, 30, 35, 50, 58, 60, 65, 79, 83, 95, 105, 115, 121, 124) and 3 of 5 family members that had concerns related to staffing. The facility had insufficient staff to ensure residents received prompt call light response, medications delivered timely, assistance with activities of daily living including nail care, restorative care and to ensure care was completed in accordance with established clinical standards, the facility assessment, and resident's needs and preferences. These failures placed residents at risk of experiencing feelings of frustration, vulnerability, diminished quality of life, and unmet care needs. Findings included . <FACILITY ASSESSMENT>Review of the facility's assessment, reviewed 04/01/2026, showed the overall full-time employees needed for adequate staffing was 5 Registered Nurses, 5 Licensed Practical Nurses, 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 77 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were labeled and dated, expired medications were removed in the medication cart and medications were not left at bedside unattended. Failure to label and date 2 of 2 intravenous (IV) medications, not dating insulin vials after opened, keeping expired medications in 2 of 4 medication carts and 3 random observations of medications at bedside unattended, placed residents at risk for adverse effects for receiving expired medications, taking the wrong medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .According to the facility policy titled Medication Storage, review date 01/2025 documented, note the date on the label for insulin vials and pens when first used. Outdated .are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposals. <MEDICATION CARTS> In an observation on 04/08/2026 at 11:22 AM, inside Medication Cart B on the second floor, was an insulin pen with an expired date of 04/03/2026. According to Staff P, Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-13 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that met residents' daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident for 4 of 14 residents (Resident 19, 35, 119, and 121) reviewed for the facility meeting the dietary needs of each resident. This failure placed all residents at risk of unintended weight loss, malnutrition, depression, feelings of helplessness, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . In an interview and observation on 04/07/2026 at 2:39 PM, Resident 121 stated the facility food does not look or taste good. The lunch tray was uncovered, on Resident 121's overbed table, pushed to the side of them, with three pieces of uneaten fish and a scoop of brown rice and carrots. In an interview on 04/07/2026 at 12:29 PM, Resident 119 stated their fish was cold and dried out. Resident 119 stated their coffee was warm for the first time ever. In an interview on 04/07/2026 at 1:01 PM, Resident 35 stated the food was terrible and they would not feed it to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored under sanitary conditions in 2 of 4 snack/nourishment refrigerators. The failure to monitor and document refrigerator temperatures, label opened food/beverage items, discard expired food items in the unit refrigerators placed all residents at risk for their food to be contaminated, development of food borne illnesses, and consuming spoiled food.Findings included .In an observation on 04/10/2026 at 3:25 PM, the second-floor nourishment refrigerator contained 12 small bottles of drinkable yogurt, with an expiration date of 03/31/2026, dairy creamer with an expiration date of 2/2026, a plastic bag contained an undated to go box, and opened, undated, salad dressing in the door. During the observation, no temperature logs were observed. In an observation and interview on 04/10/2026 at 09:37 AM, the nutrition fridge on the first floor, showed there was a temperature log to be documented and signed daily. The temperature and signature boxes were blank for 04/08/2026 and 04/09/2026 and there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document and address issues raised by the Resident Council group for seven of seven months (September, October, November, December of 2025 and January, February and March 2026) meeting minutes reviewed. Failure of activity staff to document concerns and grievances filed by the resident council in the meeting minutes and failure to report back to the council group in writing with a response, rationale and action taken placed the residents at risk for having unresolved, ongoing care concerns. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, titled Resident Council updated January 2017, documented resident council members have the right to gather and discuss thoughts, ideas, or issues related to their care and treatment. The meeting begins by reading minutes from the previous meeting, then reviewing new and old business with an opportunity for members to express concerns. Concerns brought forth by the Council are resolved via the Center grievance policy. The center communicates a response and/or decisions to the Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor the need for physical restraints for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 41 and 55) reviewed for physical restraints. The facility failed to assess, obtain consent and physician order, care plan and document ongoing evaluation of the need for the restraint. These failures placed residents at risk for harm and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) defined Physical Restraints as Any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body (State Operations Manual Appendix PP). A review of the facility policy titled, Physical Restraints and Enablers/Devices, updated in January showed the residents have the right to be free from any physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with grooming, including shaving and nail care for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 89, 104 and 121) reviewed who were unable to carry out their ADL's (activities of daily living) independently. The failure to provide residents, who were dependent on staff for assistance with grooming, placed the residents and others at risk for poor hygiene, injury, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 89> Resident 89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include traumatic brain bleed, multiple sclerosis (chronic disease where the body's immune system mistakenly attacks the protective covering of the nerves in the brain and spinal cord), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - progressive, long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe). Review of Resident 89's admission minimum data set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 01/05/2026, documented they were dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 residents (Residents 28, 72, 104, and 106) reviewed received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice and received the necessary care and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being. The facility failed to assess and document Resident's 72 and 106's for possible injury after abuse allegations. The facility failed to order mental health services as ordered for Resident 104. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident 28 received care and treatment for their catheter. This placed the residents at increased risk for decline in conditions, unmet care needs, increased discomfort, psychosocial distress and less than optimal quality of care and life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 72> In an interview on 04/10/2026 at 11:51 AM, Resident 72 stated this week Staff GG, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) left pills for them to take when they wanted to. Staff GG then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and ensure timely and appropriate services/interventions were provided to maintain, increase and/or prevent a decrease in range of motion (ROM - was the extent that a joint can move within the expected [normal] range of values) for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 3) reviewed for ROM and restorative nursing services. This placed residents at risk for developing new contractures (permanent, abnormal shortening of muscles, tendons, or skin) and/or worsening of existing contractures.Findings Included .Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include history of stroke, which affected their dominant right side. On 04/08/2026 at 10:16 AM Resident 3 was observed in their bed. Resident 3 right hand was observed balled into a fist the with the exception of their ring finger and middle finger. No splints, hand rolls, or other devices were observed on or near them. Review of Resident 3' care plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents for 2 of 3 residents (Resident's 18 and 56) sampled for accidents and for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 30, 50, 79, and 105) reviewed for smoking. Failure to ensure smoking materials (cigarettes and lighters) were secured for a safe environment to protect other residents from potential fire hazard and failed to ensure residents did not experience falls placed residents at risk for avoidable injuries and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled: Fall Management and Neurological Check, updated January 2025 stated a fall assessment was completed on admission and interventions were implemented based on the assessment. The care plan was reviewed quarterly and after a fall to determine effectiveness of current interventions and Licensed Nurses updated care plans to reduce or prevent falls. A systemic review of current interventions was completed post fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate fluids to maintain hydration for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 56 and 89) reviewed for hydration and 1 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 121) reviewed for nutrition. Failure to implement, monitor and accurately document fluids consumed to ensure fluid restrictions were implemented per provider's orders placed residents at risk for dehydration, fluid overload, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Hydration Program, dated May 2019, documented staff are to offer fluids to residents unless contraindicated by a physician order for fluid restrictions. The policy documented that water pitchers are available at bedside for residents not on fluid restrictions. <RESIDENT 89> Resident 89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a brain bleed, multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system where the immune system…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 89) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to follow physician orders, ensure that appropriate orders for oxygen administration were to include flow rate and to develop a comprehensive respiratory care plan. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs, potential negative outcomes and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Respiratory Care, Oxygen Administration, dated December 2017, documented that oxygen is administered per physician's order. Physician orders should specify method of administration, liter flow, and parameters for duration and/or frequency of administration. Resident 89 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (tissues and organs in the body do not receive enough oxygen to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a system in which residents' records were complete and accurate for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 28 and 121). This failure placed residents at risk of not having their medical records accurate and incomplete information being considered when making medical decisions.Findings included . <RESIDENT 28> Resident 28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hereditary spastic paraplegia (rare genetic disorder characterized by stiffness and weakness in the legs) and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (loss of bladder control). Review of Resident 28's discharge orders from the hospital, dated 03/14/2026, timestamped 03/16/2026, documented they had suprapubic catheter change. Review of Resident 28's care plan dated 04/08/2026 documented that they had an indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder) and did not specify which type of catheter or any specific care instruction related to this specific catheter. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 28) observed for would care and 1 of 6 staff (Staff R) observed for medication administration. These failures placed residents at risk of potential infection.Findings included .<WOUND CARE OBSERVATION> Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple decubitus ulcers (injuries to the skin and underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure on the skin) on their buttocks and bilateral legs, osteomyelitis, hereditary spastic paraplegia (inherited progressive weakness and stiffness in the legs, affecting mobility over time) and suprapubic catheter. Review of Resident 28's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated April 2026 documented they had Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) related to implanted medical device and wounds. In an observation on 04/09/2026 at 11:02 AM, outside of Resident 28's room, there was EBP signage, which directed staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of a sexual abuse allegation to the State Agency for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse/neglect reporting. This failure placed all residents at risk for potential unidentified and ongoing abuse and lack of protection from abuse. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Reporting and Response updated October 2022 the facility will immediately report all suspected and/or allegations of abuse in accordance with state and federal law.events that involve allegations of abuse or result in serious bodily injury will be reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after.Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (chronic mental health condition characterized by intense mood swings), agoraphobia (fear of not being able to escape or get help), and anxiety disorder.Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 11/10/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 1 and 2) reviewed for abuse, neglect and/or misappropriations. The failure to conduct thorough investigations placed all residents at risk for repeat incidents, potential injury, and unmet care needs. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Investigations, updated October 2022 documented the facility will conduct a thorough investigation of potential suspected and/or allegations of abuse, neglect and misappropriations in accordance with state and federal regulations.the administrator is the abuse coordinator and will be responsible for overseeing the investigations.the facility will identify and interview involved persons including alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses and others who might have knowledge of the allegations. <RESIDENT 1>Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (chronic mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure physician orders for medications were followed for 1 of 3 (Resident 3) sampled residents. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet needs, injury, and ineffective and/or delayed treatments. Findings included .Resident 3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include seizures and fracture of the first lumbar vertebrae.Review of Resident 3's care plan dated 01/14/2026 documented Resident 3 had a seizure disorder with a goal for them to remain injury free from seizure activity.In an interview on 03/02/2026 at 9:30 AM Resident 3 stated their antiseizure medications were late several times and there were some nurses that understood the importance of their medications and some that did not. Resident 3 stated they had spoken with Staff M, Licensed Practical Nurse, about their concerns.In an interview on 03/02/2026 at 10:31 AM Staff M stated they had met with Resident 3 and discussed concerns about their antiseizure medication being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure potential abuse/neglect allegations were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 2), reviewed for unexpected death. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified abuse and/or neglect and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Investigation, updated [DATE] documented the center conducted thorough investigations of potential, suspected and/or allegations of abuse, neglect.in accordance with state and federal regulations. The center identified and interviewed others who might have knowledge of the allegations, maintained complete and thorough documentations of the investigation, and patterns, tends or events that would suggest abuse/neglect. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include bladder tumor, kidney disease and vasovagal response (fainting spell caused by a sudden, temporary drop in blood pressure). Resident 2 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents sampled for legal representative, (Resident 3) had an accurate designation of legal representative on file in the facility, in case of decreased capacity. This failure placed the resident at risk of violation of resident rights to appoint a legal representative for decisions.Findings included.According to the facility's policy titled, Advanced Directives, dated January 2025, showed that during the admissions process, the facility identifies the resident's primary decision maker or appropriate legal representative and invokes this person at any time the resident is assessed as unable to make relevant health care decisions.Resident 3 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of developmental delay.Review of facility medical record revealed, Resident 3 was their own responsible party and emergency contact to contact Collateral Contact (CC) 2 who was listed as family. There was no Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement a system to ensure Physician's Orders for Life Saving Treatments (POLSTs-a document the resident completes to declare their wishes for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation [CPR] or No CPR) were in place for immediate access to nurses and failed to ensure each resident's electronic medical record (EMR) accurately and consistently reflected the resident's code status for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2) related to lifesaving treatment orders. The failure to access and follow the POLST instructions for CPR or ensure the POLST was readily available for Resident 2 placed residents at risk for receiving unwanted CPR against their known wishes, avoidable trauma, and other negative health outcomes.Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's policy titled CPR policy, updated [DATE] showed the POLST or Advanced Directive (AD) is placed in a binder and located in a central and accessible location of the facility, or on each unit.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a system was in place in which residents' records were complete, accurate, accessible, and systematically organized for 2 of 3 residents (2 and 3) reviewed for accurate and complete medical records. The facility failed to ensure the medical records reflected an adverse event for Resident 2 and hospital visit report for Resident 3. These failures to not maintain complete and accurate medical records placed residents at risk for medical complications, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .<RESIDENT 2>Review of an incident report investigation dated [DATE] at 5:30 AM, documented that Resident 2 had an episode of syncope (temporary loss of consciousness and posture due to insufficient blood flow to the brain) on the toilet around 2:00 AM. The nurse checked their vitals, and the resident was up in their chair for 30 minutes and then went to bed.Review of the clinical record including progress notes did not include the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker when reviewed for qualifications of a social worker for a facility licensed for more than 120 beds. This failure placed residents at risk of not having access to medically related social services, inability to coordinate care, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility's daily census report provided on 12/16/2025 at 10:58 AM, showed that the facility had 122 available beds. During an interview on 12/16/2025 at 1:47 PM, Staff F, Divisional Social Services, stated the acting social services director, Staff, E, Social Services Director, did not hold a bachelor's degree or qualifications. Staff F stated two new social service staff were hired on 12/15/2025. Staff F stated they had actively sought to fill the social service position with a person who had the required qualifications and had been at the facility at least weekly to support Staff E. During an interview on 12/16/2025 at 3:51 PM, Staff E, stated the prior social service director left employment with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a system in place that ensured grievances were initiated, logged, addressed and resolved timely in response to residents' verbal conveyance of concerns for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), who verbalized complaints. The facility's failure to initiate, log, investigate verbalized concerns, inform residents of the facility's findings and the actions taken, if any, prevented the facility from identifying care trends and determining if actions taken to resolve grievances were effective. These failures led to the resident repeatedly reporting the same issues without resolution and placed them at risk for feeling frustrated, unimportant, with diminished self-worth and decreased quality of life. Findings included.In an interview on 12/16/2025 at 9:38 AM, Resident 1 stated they had multiple concerns and grievances about their care. Resident 1 stated they had a meeting with the social worker and resident care manager on 12/15/2025 at which time they expressed multiple grievances. Resident 1 stated they had asked several times for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations for 5 of 6 residents (Resident 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The failure to conduct thorough investigations placed all residents at risk for repeat incidents, potential injury, and unmet care needs. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Investigation, dated 10/2022 stated it's the facility process to conduct a thorough investigation of potential, suspected, and/or allegations of abuse and neglect.the facility will identify and interviews involved persons, included the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegation. <RESIDENTS 3 and 4> Review of an allegation dated 12/05/2025 revealed Resident 4 alleged that they were inappropriately touched by their roommate (Resident 3). Resident 3 admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included cognitive impairment. According to Resident 3's care plan updated 12/03/2025, the care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice and their person-centered plan of care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2) reviewed for pressure ulcers and 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) reviewed for weights and respiratory care. The failure to obtain physician ordered laboratory testing, weekly weights and provide respiratory care in accordance with physicians' orders placed residents at risk for continued infection, delays in treatment, unmet care needs and a decreased quality of life.Findings included . <RESIDENT 2> Resident 2 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sacral pressure wound infection, history of pressure ulcers of the sacrum, hips and heel, and urinary tract infection. Review of Resident 2's hospital discharge orders dated 11/26/2025 showed the resident had orders for weekly laboratory tests which included: Weekly labs while on intravenous antibiotics which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's received care and services in accordance with professional standards for one of one resident (Resident 2) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Failure to follow physician's orders for wound treatment and follow established standards of infection control procedures for wound care, placed residents at risk for adverse outcomes, wound deterioration, infection and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Skin Integrity, with a revised date of July 2025, documented that in the event a resident was admitted with or develops a skin ulcer/pressure ulcer, wound care was provided to treat, heal and prevent, if possible, further development of skin ulcers/pressure ulcers/wounds. Resident 2 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sacral pressure wound infection, history of pressure ulcers of the sacrum, hips and heel, and urinary tract infection. The resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) whose investigations were reviewed for thorough investigations, and failed to log 1 of 1 (COVID - Coronavirus Disease 2019) communicable disease outbreak. The failure to log, and conduct thorough investigations placed residents at risk for repeat incidents, injury, and for unmet care needs due to a lack of thorough investigations after incident occurred. These failures placed residents at risk for repeat incidents and injury. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Investigation, updated October 2022, states the Administrator is the designated abuse coordinator and is responsible for overseeing staff that assist with investigations . the facility will identify, and interview involved persons that may have knowledge of incident . the facility will ensure complete and thorough documentation, investigate trends and patterns. Review of the facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federally required screening of all individuals who has both an Intellectual Disability (ID) or Related Condition (RC) and a serious mental illness (SMI) prior to admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility or a significant change of condition) form was completed prior to admission and according to the guidelines specified for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 4, 5, and 6) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving timely and necessary mental health services, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, PASRR Process Policy and Procedure, revised 01/01/2025, states the facility will validate the Level I, if there were none, medical records or designee will obtain .if a Level II was indicated the social worker will validate, within a timely period . follow up as needed federal PASRR rules. <RESIDENT 5> Resident 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from avoidable accidents when fall prevention care plans were not implemented for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for accidents/incidents. These failures placed all residents at risk for lack of consistent interventions, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Finding included . Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia (cognitive decline caused by damage to the blood vessels in the brain), chronic pulmonary obstructive disorder (COPD - lung disease), and heart failure. The Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had severe cognition impairment and had a history of falls. Review of Resident 2's care plan focus dated 10/04/2024, documented the resident was at risk for falls related to deconditioning, and balance problems. The care plan documented an intervention that was to provide assist with transfers and ambulation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure annual Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) performance reviews were completed for 6 of 11 CNAs (Staff F,G,H,I,J and K) who had been employed longer than one year. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect the competency of those CNAs and the quality of care provided to residents. Findings included . Review of facility employee records on 01/22/2025 showed the following CNAs hired greater than one year did not have annual performance evaluations completed for the prior year: - Staff F, CNA, date of hire was 05/18/2023, - Staff G, CNA, date of hire was 04/04/2023, - Staff H, CNA, date of hire 07/12/2023, - Staff I, CNA, date of hire 06/03/2009, - Staff J, CNA, date of hire 11/22/2023, - Staff K, CNA, date of hire 12/16/2006. In an interview on 01/22/2025 at 1:00 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, stated the facility was behind on completing annual evaluations for nursing assistants. Refer to WAC 388-97-1680(2)(b)(i)
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent (%, unit of measure). During observation of 34 opportunities for error, 1 of 2 Licensed Nurses (LN, Staff P), made thirty-one errors, an error rate of 91 %. This placed residents at risk for side effects, unnecessary medications, and/or reduced medication effectiveness due to improper administration. Findings included . <RESIDENT 46> A review of the January 2025 Physician's orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 46 showed one pill for blood sugar regulation was ordered to be administered at 7:00 AM, one injection for blood sugar regulation, one pill for iron deficiency, and one pain patch were due to be administered at 8:00 AM, and one aspirin tablet for blood clotting was due to be administered at 9:00 AM. During an observation of medication administration on 1/21/2025 at 12:07 PM, Staff P, licensed practical nurse (LPN) was observed administering medications to Resident 46. Staff P administered one injection for blood sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required notice of transfer/discharge at the time of discharge or transfer to the hospital for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 50) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge of their rights related to transfers and discharges. Findings included . <RESIDENT 50> Resident 50 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure impacting fluid balance. Review of Resident 50's clinical record on 01/17/2025 showed the resident had a change of condition and was transferred to the emergency department on 12/15/2024. Review of Resident 50's clinical record on 01/17/2025 showed no documentation the required transfer/discharge notice had been provided to Resident 50. In an interview on 01/22/2025 at 11:50 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, stated a transfer form was being completed which was sent to the hospital with residents, but not provided to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notices at the time of transfer to the hospital for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 50 and 72) reviewed for hospitalizations. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . <RESIDENT 50> Resident 50 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure impacting fluid balance. Review of Resident 50's clinical record on 01/17/2025 showed the resident had a change of condition and was transferred to the emergency department on 12/15/2024. Review of Resident 50's clinical record on 01/17/2025 showed no documentation of bed hold notice was provided to Resident 50 when they were transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. In an interview on 01/22/2025 at 11:50 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services (DNS), stated the process was that if the patient was able, the nurse would review the bed hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assistance with bathing, nail care, grooming, and assist the residents out of bed for 3 of 4 dependent residents (Residents 20, 58 and 68) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Facility failure to provide the residents, who were dependent on staff for assistance with ADL's, placed the resident and others at risk for unmet care needs, poor hygiene, injury due to nail breakage, diminished dignity, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, (ADL's) revised July 2015, showed the nursing assistants (NAC) will assist with ADL's based on the resident's individualized plan of care. These interventions will be on the Kardex (NAC guide to proving care), which was accessed in Point of Care (POC). <RESIDENT 58> Resident 58 admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Resident 58's care plan showed the resident preferred showers during the day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 resident's (Resident's 58 and 68) received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice and received the necessary care and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being. This placed the residents at increased risk of discomfort, unmet care needs, and medical complications. Findings included . <RESIDENT 58> Resident 58 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include high blood pressure, dementia and constipation. Review of Resident 58's physician orders dated 10/19/2023, showed staff were directed to give Milk of Magnesia (MOM-medication used to treat constipation) as needed if the resident did not have a bowel movement for three days, if no results from MOM, administer a Bisacodyl suppository as needed, if no results from suppository administer a Fleet enema and notify the MD if no results. Review of the bowel monitoring documentation beginning 11/01/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the hemodialysis (a mechanical way of removing waste from the body when the kidneys no longer function) center for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 335) reviewed for hemodialysis (HD) services. The failure to consistently and accurately complete resident's pre- and post-dialysis assessments and consistently ensure communication between the facility and dialysis center about what occurred during HD was completed, placed the resident at risk for unidentified medical complications and other potential/negative health outcomes. Findings included In a review of the facility's policy titled Dialysis, dated March 2015 stated the facility would communicate with the dialysis center by completing the Dialysis Transfer Form .the facility would require the dialysis center to provide the following information upon the resident's return from dialysis: - pre-dialysis and post-dialysis weight, the post-dialysis weight was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (Resident 26, 68 and 72) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) as required. The facility failed to ensure appropriate indication for psychotropic medications and to obtain consent including a discussion of risks and benefits of the psychotropic medication, monitor and document behaviors and or symptom. These failures placed the residents at risk for medication-related complications and for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medication. Findings included . As referenced in the Food and Drugs/Drug (FDA) Safety Information, anti-psychotic medications have serious side effects and can be especially dangerous for elderly residents. The use of anti-psychotic medications without an adequate rationale, or for the sole purpose of limiting or controlling expressions or indications of distress without first identifying the cause,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 7 residents (Resident 46) observed during medication pass were free from significant medication errors. This placed the resident at risk for complications and decline in condition. Findings included . Review of the package insert for Lispro insulin showed the medication started to act 15 minutes after administration, with a peak time of one hour, and continued to work for two to four hours. The package inserts further stated taking too much Lispro insulin could cause low blood sugar, and the medication should be taken exactly as the doctor ordered. In an observation on 12/21/2025 at 12:07 PM, Staff P, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed administering Resident 46's 8:00 AM Lispro insulin, four hours late. During an interview on 12/21/2025 at 12:07 PM, Staff P, was asked when Resident 46's blood sugar was taken. Staff P stated that they took Resident 46's blood sugar sometime around 6:00 AM. Review of Resident 46's Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that Resident 46 had orders to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with state and federal laws appropriately for 2 of 2 (1st Floor and 2nd Floor) Medication Storage Rooms. The facility failed to ensure Schedule II-V (Substances with a high potential for abuse which may lead to severe psychological or physical dependence) controlled medications were in a separate locked permanently affixed compartment not accessible to others. These failures left controlled substances to be unintended with access to drugs that should have been securely stored. Findings included . In an observation and interview on 01/17/2025 at 10:08 AM, in the 2nd floor medication storage room there was a refrigerator. In the refrigerator there was a black box that was not permanently affixed to the refrigerator. Staff U, Licensed Practical Nurse/Resident Care Manager confirmed the controlled substances were placed in the black box. Staff U stated they did not have a permanently affixed lock box for their Scheduled II-V's controlled substances that were required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff were complaint with Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines and standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) that's on Transmission-Based Precaution (TBP), 1 of 4 residents' rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) that's on Enhanced-Barrier Precaution (EBP) and 1 of 1 resident during catheter care (Resident 45). The facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate hand hygiene practices in caring for a Clostridium Difficile [(C. diff) a highly contagious bacteria that can infect the gut and cause watery diarrhea] positive resident and when performing catheter care and wearing appropriate Personal Protective Equipment [(PPE) - specialized clothing clothing or gear worn to pretect for infection or illness] during high contact resident care activities. These failures placed all residents and staff at risk for potential infections. Findings include . Review of the facility policy titled, Transmission Based…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to promptly refer, reimburse or document on 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) who had their dentures dropped, broken and subsequently lost at the facility. This failed practice placed the resident at risk of diminished quality of life and financial impact. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Dental Services - Dentures, dated October 2017, showed The Center assists residents as necessary or requested upon notification and confirmation of lost or damaged dentures, within 3 days of notification and confirmation, referred resident with lost or damaged dentures for dental services and documented the referral in the medical record. The Center reimbursed for confirmed damage or loss of dentures in the following circumstances: 1) Confirmed loss of dentures within the Center, 2) Damage of dentures that occurs as a result of Center actions, which may include, but is not limited to dentures which were dropped. Resident 1 admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents' rooms, shower room and hallways for 1 of 2 floors were clean and free of damaged walls. These failed practices placed the residents on the first floor at risk of diminished quality of life. Findings included . In a phone interview on 08/27/2024 at 5:10 PM, Collateral Contact (CC) 1, Resident 2's family member, stated the facility did not appear to be clean. CC 1 stated they had to request the floor to be cleaned of food items from under the resident's bed. CC 1 stated the second floor was like a completely different business from the first floor. CC 1 stated there were stains on the walls on the first floor, it was unkept and not clean. In an interview on 08/28/2024 at 1:18 PM, Resident 4, stated sometimes the floor in their room did not get mopped and their room was not dusted. In an observation and co-interview on 08/28/2024 at 1:35 PM, Resident 3 and CC 2, Resident 3's family member, stated they did not find the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 6), reviewed for falls received the implementation of an intervention to reduce the risk of further falls. This placed Resident 6 and other residents at further risk of falls, potential injury and diminished quality of life. Finding included . Resident 6 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] following an acute care hospitalization for encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain). Resident 6 diagnoses included seizure disorder, Parkinsonism (collection of movement symptoms associated with several conditions including Parkinson's disease), and pain. Review of Resident 6's care plan showed, the resident was at risk for falls related to deconditioning and gait and balance problems which was initiated on 07/11/2024. The interventions identified and dated for 07/11/2024, included ensure the call light was within the resident's reach, educate the resident about safety reminders, follow the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0851 — isolatedElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the direct care data of both contract and agency staff was accurately entered into the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, a system for tracking staffing in nursing homes) for 1 of 1 quarter (Quarter 4) for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 reviewed for PBJ reporting. This failure caused the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to have inaccurate data related to nursing home staffing levels which had the potential to impact care and services provided to all the residents in the facility. Findings included . Review of the PBJ information submitted by the facility showed for the 2023 4th Quarter the facility was 106 hours short of the required hours. In an interview on 08/06/2024 at 11:30 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated the contracted agency staff were not using the time clock was why their hours were not captured on the PBJ report. In an email communication received on 08/06/2024, the Nursing Home Policy & Program Manager noted they had previously provided the facility with written and verbal information and guidance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required refund for 3 of 4 sampled residents and/or their resident representative (Resident 3, 4, and 6) within the required 30 days after the resident's discharge. This failed practice placed the resident and/or resident representative at risk of financial hardship. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Refunds, updated May 2007, showed the Nursing Center processes refunds to resident or their estates within the earlier of 30 days from the date of the resident's death or discharge from the center. Where a third-party payor (such as Medicare or an HMO [Health Maintenance Organization]) has not paid the Center on behalf of the resident, amount billed to such third-party payor decreased the amount of any resident refund until the third-party's payment is made. The facility's policy had a handwritten notation, Waiting for Med [Medicare] B to payout prior to issue refund. Once Med B claim submitted will issue refund. In an interview on 06/03/2024 at 2:08 PM, Staff P, Business Office…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 2) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) as required. The facility failed to ensure person-centered behavioral interventions were in place, appropriate indications for use, and diagnoses were present for psychotropic medications. Resident 2 had a decline in their function, increase in falls, and a decline in their cognition after the start of psychotropic medications. These failures placed residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications and for medication-related complications. Findings included . As referenced in the State Operations Manual Appendix PP, date 02/03/2023, referenced the Food and Drugs/Drug (FDA) Safety Information, anti-psychotic medications have serious side effects and can be especially dangerous for elderly residents. The use of anti-psychotic medications without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's Power of Attorney (POA) was notified timely for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for notification of change of condition. The facility failed to notify the POA timely of the start of an antibiotic for a respiratory tract infection and of a ground level fall. This failure placed all the residents' POA at risk of not being informed of residents' status. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia, fractured hip, and depression. Review of a Late Entry, nursing progress note dated 03/28/2024, showed a new order was received for Levaquin (an antibiotic) for five days, Mucinex (nasal decongestant) for 10 days and Albuterol (medication used to treat bronchospasms) the family was notified, and Resident 1 was placed on alert by Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN). Review of nursing progress note dated 03/29/2024, showed Resident 1 was heard calling out for help and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 new hired Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) nursing staff (Staff A) received their credentials (username and password) to document in the facility's electronic medical record prior to working independently. This facility failed practice recorded Staff A, LPN falsely documented nursing notes, medication administration record (MAR) and treatment administration record (TAR) as completed by Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN). Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Electronic Signature, updated June 2016 showed authorized employees and contractors are assigned a credential, commonly a username with a password or pin, which is used as an electronic signature. An attestation statement is signed to certify that they have sole access to and are the sole user of the password/pin. Employees and contractors are instructed that they will not share their password/pin and that doing so will be grounds for disciplinary action up to and including immediate termination. Review of Staff B, Electronic Signature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the direct care data of both contract and agency staff was accurately entered into the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, a system for tracking staffing in nursing homes) for 1 of 1 quarters (Quarter 3) for the Q3's Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 (which included July 2023 through September 2023) reviewed for PBJ reporting. This failure caused the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to have inaccurate data related to nursing home staffing levels which had the potential to impact care and services provided to all the residents in the facility. Findings included . Review of the CASPER (Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports) PBJ Staffing Data Report dated FY Quarter 3 2023 (July 1 - September showed the result of Excessively low weekend Staffing Triggered=Submitted Weekend Staffing is excessively low. In an interview on 03/03/2024 at 11:32 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated all hours were submitted through the corporation based on the payroll system. In an interview on 03/04/2024 at 9:13 AM, Staff T, [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-08 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that they had an individual who had Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had an individual who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control as their designated Infection Preventionist. This failure placed all residents and staff at risk for unmet infection control issues and/or care needs. Findings included . In an interview on 03/03/2024 at 10:41AM, Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Staff Development/Infection Preventionist (IP), stated they were the acting IP in the facility. Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) certificate provided by the facility on 03/07/2024, showed that Staff E had completed their Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course on 03/06/2024. In an interview on 03/08/2024 at 10:52AM, Staff E confirmed they had taken over the IP role at the facility in December of 2023 and they had not completed their IP training course test until 03/06/2024. In an interview on 03/08/2024 at 12:03PM, Staff A,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for 4 of 10 sampled residents (Resident 50, 71, 191, and 39) reviewed. The failure: 1) to provide wound care treatment recommendations made by the contracted wound care providers, 2) to offer ice for pain as ordered, 3) to obtain a food texture consult as ordered, 4) to obtain a physical therapy consult as ordered after a fall, 5) to administer oxygen as ordered, and 6) to monitor and assess a resident with an infection, placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, pain, wounds that didn't heal, difficulty eating, more falls, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 50> Resident 50 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include morbid obesity, chronic pain in the left leg, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 01/12/2024, the resident had no cognitive impairment, no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete required annual performance reviews for 3 of 3 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (Staff H, J, and M) reviewed for annual review after one year of employment. Failure to complete annual performance evaluations and provide in-service education as needed based on performance evaluations placed all residents at risk for diminished quality of care. Findings included . On 03/04/2024 at 1:00 PM, a list of sample staff documentation was requested to the facility for Staff H Certified Nursing Assistant (NAC), Staff J, NAC, and Staff M, NAC, which included their annual performance evaluations. None were provided. In an interview on 03/05/2024 at 2:13 PM, Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse/Staff Development Coordinator (SDC), stated they were now responsible for performance evaluations for NAC's, and had only conducted one performance evaluation since accepting the position in December 2023. Staff E stated they were not aware whether the prior SDC had completed performance evaluations timely. In an interview on 03/07/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure two of two medication rooms had unexpired medications. In addition, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured and not accessible to residents. These failures placed the residents at risk of receiving expired medications and potential drug misuse. Findings included . <FIRST FLOOR MEDICATION STORAGE ROOM> On 03/03/2024 at 11:55 AM, an observation and interview was conducted with Staff S, Registered Nurse (RN), in the first-floor medication room. Inside of the freezer particles of debris along the side and front of the freezer was observed. The freezer contained several ice packs. The refrigerator had debris scatter throughout the inside. Staff S stated they were not aware who maintained the cleanliness of the medication refrigerator/freezer, and the surveyor should ask the kitchen staff. The floor of the medication room was obviously dirty with scuff marks and dirt. When Staff S was asked who maintained the floors in the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 employees, (Staff H, J, and M) reviewed for training, had the required 12 hours per year of in-services, abuse, and dementia training. This failure placed residents at risk of less than competent care and services from staff. Findings included . Review of Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), employee record showed Staff H was hired June of 2009. For the year of June 2022 through June 2023, the facility was unable to provide documentation Staff H had completed the required 12 hours of annual in-services or required abuse training. Review of Staff J, CNA, employee record showed Staff J was hired in August of 2016. For the year of August 2022 through August 2023, the facility was unable to provide documentation Staff J had completed the required 12 hours of annual in-services or required abuse training. Review of Staff M, CNA, employee record showed Staff M was hired in November of 2022. For the year of November 2022 through November 2023, the facility was unable to provide documentation Staff M had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor residents' rights to have an opening and functioning dining room (1st floor dining room) for breakfast where residents could eat and socialize while they ate. The failure to open the dining room for breakfast resulted in residents having to eat in the hallways or in their rooms and placed them at risk for isolation and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Resident Handbook, revised date December 2023, showed We encourage all residents to eat in the dining room, which is designed for a pleasant dining experience. Review of the undated facility dining room schedule showed there was no scheduled breakfast service in a facility dining room. In observations on 03/04/2024 between 8:22 AM and 8:27 AM, Residents 48 and 66 were observed eating in the hallway by the 1st floor nursing station. In an interview on 03/06/2024 at 11:39 AM, Resident 25 stated they would like to eat breakfast in the dining room but had not been offered to eat in the dining room for about a year, and they had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs and preferences of 1 of 1 resident (Resident 50) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to provide a chair for the resident to sit in so they could spend time out of bed, and to provide a wheelchair (w/c) that met the resident's needs. This failure placed residents at risk being confined to their bed with no option of anywhere to go outside of their bed. Findings included . Resident 50 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include morbid obesity, chronic pain in the left leg, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 01/12/2024, the resident had no cognitive impairment and no unhealed pressure injuries, but they did have Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD - superficial skin damage caused by sustained exposure to moisture such as incontinence, wound exudate, or perspiration) and were at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 6 residents (Residents 72 and 50) who were reviewed for abuse and neglect were free of abuse and neglect. Resident 72 was abused when staff forced them to receive care when they had refused. Resident 50 was neglected when they were confined to their bed for months, did not provide the resident an option of a chair or other furniture they could sit in so they could get out of bed, and to provide a wheelchair that met the resident's needs. These failures placed the residents at risk for abuse and neglect, unmet needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 72> Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include alcoholic liver cirrhosis (chronic disease of the liver) with ascites (accumulation of fluid in the abdominal cavity), alcohol dependence, depression, and pain. Review of Resident 72's Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 72) reviewed for thorough investigations and had corrective action taken following an investigation where a staff to resident abuse allegation was verified. This failure placed all residents at risk for abuse, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include alcoholic liver cirrhosis (chronic disease of the liver) with ascites (accumulation of fluid in the abdominal cavity), alcohol dependence, depression, and pain. Review of Resident 72's Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 01/19/2024, showed the resident had no cognitive impairment and they did not reject care. Review of Resident 72's statement documented by Staff A, Administrator, dated 02/20/2024, showed the resident told Staff M, Certified Nursing Assistant (NAC), they did not want their brief changed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain the Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federally required screening of all individuals who has both an Intellectual Disability, or Related Condition, and a serious mental illness prior to admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility or a significant change of condition) and identify and refer for Level II (an in-depth evaluation to determine whether the resident requires specialized rehabilitation services) PASRR recommendations when the resident experienced a change in their psychiatric conditions for 1 of 5 resident's (Resident 65) reviewed for PASARR. The failed to obtain a Level II assessment timely residents experienced hallucinations and delusions, delayed the implementation of recommendations, and left resident at risk for unmet mental health needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 65 was admitted to the facility from the community on 01/09/2023 with diagnoses to include mental disorder, depression, dementia with behavioral disturbance and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were met for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 87) reviewed for wandering. The facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse completed the assessment of a wander guard device (worn device that alerts related to location) before they documented the task was completed. This failure placed the resident at risk for an inaccurate assessment, negative outcomes, and potential elopement risk. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Elopement/Wandering, updated March 2018, showed the licensed nurse was to complete an evaluation for placement and function of the device every shift. The licensed nurse then will document in the resident's medical record. Resident 87 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's and anxiety. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 02/18/2024, showed the resident had severe cognition impairment, and wore a wander guard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently conduct and document pre and post dialysis assessments, ensure consistent ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 61) reviewed for dialysis. This failure had the potential to place residents who receive dialysis at risk for unmet care needs and medical complications. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Dialysis, dated March 2015, showed the center communicates with the dialysis center by completing the Dialysis Transfer Form and sending new labs obtained .the Dialysis Transfer Form showed the following: medication changes since last dialysis appointment, labs since last dialysis appointment, changes in medical or mental status since last dialysis appointment .The policy further stated the facility would initiate fluid restrictions upon recommendations of the dialysis unit. Resident 61 admitted [DATE] and received dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents (Resident 65 and 3) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) as required. The facility failed to ensure appropriate indication for psychotropic medications and to monitor and document behaviors and or symptom. These failures placed the residents at risk for medication-related complications and for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medication. Findings included . As referenced in the Food and Drugs/Drug (FDA) Safety Information, anti-psychotic medications have serious side effects and can be especially dangerous for elderly residents. The use of anti-psychotic medications without an adequate rationale, or for the sole purpose of limiting or controlling expressions or indications of distress without first identifying the cause, there was little chance that they would be effective, and they commonly cause complications such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system in which resident's records were complete, accurate, and accessible, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 87) reviewed for accurate and complete medical records. The facility failed to ensure the medical record for Resident 87 reflected the lack of guardianship, and the authority limitations of the court appointed visitor. This failure by the facility to not maintain complete and accurate medical records placed residents at risk for medical complications, unmet care needs, and for diminished quality of life. Finding included . Resident 87 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's, and anxiety. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 02/18/2024, showed the resident had severe cognition impairment. Review of Resident 87's medical record on 03/03/2024, showed no advanced directive, no information for a power of attorney (POA), or a physician's order for life-sustaining treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control and transmission-based precautions (TBP) were being followed for 1 of 1 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) on contact TBP. This failure placed residents and staff at risk for transmission of communicable diseases. Findings included . In an observation on 03/03/2024 at 10:39 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] had a contact TBP signage outside of the room. The contact TBP signage showed everyone who entered the room must clean/wash their hands, put on gloves and a gown. In an observation and interview on 03/03/2024 at 11:23AM, Staff P, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), read the contact TBP signage outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] and entered with a surgical mask on. Upon leaving room [ROOM NUMBER], Staff P stated the contact precautions were for the resident in bed 2, they were going to see the resident in bed 1 and did not need to wear any personal protective equipment (PPE - equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with state and federal laws, and expired medications were discarded appropriately for two of two (1st Floor and 2nd Floor) Medication Storage Rooms. These failures placed residents at risk to receive expired medications and to experience adverse side effects and other potential negative health outcomes. Findings include . <FIRST FLOOR> In an observation on 12/15/2023 at 11:01 AM, the 1st Floor medication room refrigerator was medications for all three carts on the unit. On one of the shelves in the refrigerator was a metal black box with a hole, the box was partially open, no lock visible. Inside the box was six bottles of liquid concentrated Lorazepam (anti-anxiety) medication. Lorazepam was a scheduled Class four controlled substance (effects brain function). In the refrigerator there was two bottles of barium swallow (medication to take before a procedure) 2% weight/volume with expiration date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with food safety standards in the facility kitchen and in 2 of 2 resident nourishment refrigerators. The failure to maintain a sanitary nourishment refrigerator placed residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings included . <FIRST FLOOR NOURISHMENT REFRIGERATOR/FREEZER> In an observation on 12/15/023 at 11:20 AM, the 1st Floor nourishment refrigerator and freezer were both soiled with various types of food matter, there was stains on the inside of the doors of the refrigerator and freezer. The outside door handles to the refrigerator and freezer were visible soiled with thick layer of dust on the top of the refrigerator. The temperature log for 12/15/2023 was blank. In an interview on 12/15/2023 at 11:23 AM, Staff W, Dietary Cook, stated they were not responsible for cleaning the nourishment refrigerator and freezer, they stated they thought housekeeping was the one that would do that. Staff W stated they would update the temperature log for today. <SECOND FLOOR NOURISHMENT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-21 · tag F0813 — widespreadHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their personal food policy for foods brought in from the outside and stored in 2 of 2 resident (1st and 2nd floor) nourishment refrigerators/freezers. The failure to properly store residents' personal foods placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Personal Refrigerators and Foods Brought into Center by Family/Visitors, dated August 2020, showed food was to be covered, labeled, dated, and discarded according to guidelines. Review of the facility policy titled, Nursing Unit Refrigerator Storage Guide, dated May 2018, showed that all resident food must have name, room number, and use by date. All unlabeled items will be discarded. Packaged foods when opened are labeled with use by date as follows: - Pudding within two days. - Homemade/leftovers that was brought in from outside the facility in three days or less. - Cut fruit or vegetables three days or less. - Lunch meat/sandwiches in three days. - Jello, milk, cottage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure abuse policies and procedures were implemented by failing to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and neglect, ensure investigations identified the root cause of the incident, completed timely, interview staff involved and protect the resident for 14 of 16 sampled resident incidents investigations (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 17, and 18) reviewed for allegations of abuse and neglect. These failures placed residents at risk for unidentified abuse and/or neglect and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Investigation, updated October 2022, stated the facility will conduct a thorough investigation of potential, suspected and/or allegations of abuse and neglect. The facility will identify and interview all potential persons involved in the allegation investigation. The facility will investigate patterns, trends, and events that suggest possible abuse and neglect. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing services to 6 of 14 sampled residents ( Residents 4, 7, 8, 9, 14 and 15), and failed to respond to call lights in a timely manner for 1 of 2 floors (1st Floor) reviewed for staffing. The facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nursing staff to provide services such as bathing, and toileting to the residents. Failure to timely respond to resident call lights, and have sufficient, competent Nursing Assistants Certified (NAC), resulted in missed bathing, and delayed toileting needs for the residents. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, discomfort, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] with a look back of September 2021 through September 2022, showed that the average census was 87. The assessment stated the facility had a known ability to care for difficult, and high acuity (more severe) residents. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff were compliant with Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines and standards of practice for 1 of 2 floors (2nd Floor). The facility failed to ensure oversight and implementation of their Infection Prevention and Control Program during a Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19, an infectious disease-causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise [a general feeling of discomfort/uneasiness], headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death) outbreak. The facility failed to ensure staff used personal protective equipment (PPE) in accordance with national standards and failed to disinfect reusable medical equipment according to manufactures instructions. These failures placed all residents, visitors, and staff at risk of developing and/or transmitting disease. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain the Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR a federally required screening of all individuals who has both an Intellectual Disability (ID) or Related Condition (RC) and a serious mental illness (SMI) prior to admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility or a significant change of condition) and follow recommendations for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 18) reviewed for PASARR. Facility failure obtain the Level II (an in-depth evaluation to determine whether the resident requires specialized rehabilitation services) timely delayed the implementation of recommendations and left the resident at risk for unmet mental health needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include lymphedema (a condition of localized swelling), severe obesity, and atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm). Review of a facility investigation, dated 11/12/2023 at 7:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to meet the needs of 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for care planning. This failure placed residents at risk for injuries to their skin and a diminished quality of life. Findings Included . Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses included dementia and chronic lower extremity edema. Resident 3 was on hospice services in place. In a review of the facility's injury of unknown source incident report, dated 10/17/2023, showed Resident 3 was found to have a bruise to their left lower leg. The incident report concluded the resident was unable to provide how they obtained the injury. The facility linked the injury to Resident 3 bumping into their wheelchair (w/c) when it was parked next to their bed. Resident 3 was described as alert to themselves only. In a review of Resident 3's care plan, dated 07/27/2023, showed the resident had potential for impaired skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled resident (1) who was admitted with osteoarthritis and pain in both of their needs and legs were transferred in manner to prevent potential injury. This placed resident at risk for potential injury during transfers and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cellulitis (a deep infection of the skin caused by bacteria) of the right toe, osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time), and pain. In a review of Resident 1's care plan, dated 09/19/2023, showed the resident had a self care performance deficit related to activity intolerance, impaired balance, and morbid obesity. The goal showed that the resident would improve their current level of function in transfers to limited assistance. There were no detailed interventions regarding Resident 1's pain during transfers related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 1 and 2) reviewed for potential abuse or neglect. The failure to conduct complete and thorough investigations placed residents at risk for repeat incidents, injury, and lack of appropriate corrective action on the part of the facility. Findings included . Review of Chapter two of the Nursing Home Guidelines, sixth edition, showed that A thorough investigation was a systematic collection and review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events. It seeks to determine if abuse, neglect, abandonment, personal and/or financial exploitation or misappropriation of resident property occurred, and how to prevent further occurrences .The investigation should end with the identification of who was involved in the incident, and what, when, where, why, and how the incident happened including the probable or reasonable cause. It should also allow the nursing home to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were reviewed and revised to accurately reflect resident needs and preferences for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for allegations of abuse and neglect. This failure placed Resident 2 at risk for psychosocial harm when the care plan was not updated to reflect a preference for staff of a specific gender for toileting and personal care and the facility continued to schedule staff of the non-preferred gender to care for the resident. Findings included . Review of an allegation of neglect investigation, dated 10/10/2023, showed Resident 2 was alleged not to have received care by a named staff member. The incident investigation showed the facility identified the resident had refused the care from the named staff member and stated it was due to the resident's preference for staff of the opposite gender only to provide personal care. The investigation summary, dated 10/16/2023, stated the facility had updated the resident's care plan to reflect the resident preference of staff of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care. Failure to assess residents skin risk factors, identify a change in the residents skin, and implement care planned interventions for residents with non-pressure skin conditions accurately and thoroughly. This failure placed residents at risk for delayed wound healing, medical complication, increased pain, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 admitted [DATE] and was alert and oriented. Review of the admission nursing assessment and progress note, dated 09/19/2023, showed the resident was admitted with a yeast rash to ABD [abdominal] folds, groin, both buttocks, sacrum and coccyx [tailbone]. Review of the admission Mininum Data Set (MDS - a required assessment of the resident's status) assessment, dated 09/26/2023, showed Resident 1 was always incontinent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of neglect to the State Agency within 24 hours and to log the allegations in the facility's reporting log as required for 4 of 4 identified residents (Resident 3, 4, 5, and 6) reviewed for abuse/neglect. The failure to report, log and timely investigate allegations of neglect placed residents at risk for ongoing unaddressed neglect, and decreased quality of life and other negative healthcare outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Washington Mandatory Reporter, dated August 2012, showed the facility would ensure policies were developed and implemented which required staff to report abuse and neglect, and all allegations involving abandonment, abuse, neglect, financial exploitation, or misappropriation are reported immediately to the department and confirms that reports are made through established processes in accordance with state law. Review of an allegation of potential neglect involving Resident 5 showed a facility staff member (Staff E, Certified Occupational Therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-04-13 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing information was being posted in a place readily accessible to residents/visitors and included the required information on 2 of 7 days of the recertification survey. This failure placed residents, family members, and visitors at risk of not being fully informed of current staffing levels and resident census information. Findings included .In an observation 04/13/2026, at 9:55 AM, the facility's daily nurse staffing information was posted on a wall near the reception desk at the entrance of the building. The current nurse staffing information, dated of 04/13/2026, was posted and behind that was 04/10/2026, but the weekend dates were not found for 04/11/2026 and 04/12/2026.In an interview on 04/10/2026, at 9:50 AM, Staff Z, Staffing Coordinator, stated that they are responsible for posting the daily nurse staffing information and update throughout the day as needed.In an interview on 04/13/2026 at 10:00 AM, Staff Z, Staffing Coordinator, stated that no one fills out the daily nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$295,969 in federal fines across 6 penalties.
- $32,786 — penalty dated 2026-03-04
- $46,040 — penalty dated 2026-01-28
- $15,584 — penalty dated 2024-12-30
- $50,278 — penalty dated 2024-06-20
- $104,832 — penalty dated 2024-03-08
- $46,449 — penalty dated 2023-09-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.0 | +2.0 vs chain |
The other 43 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 43; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS (WA) LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| CH PACIFIC NORTHWEST HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/31/2023 |
| WITZCORP GLOBAL LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| HERZKA, YISROEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| YENOWITZ, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| CHUA, WINNIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| ODENTHAL, JASON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| COUVE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2025 |
| COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2025 |
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST OPCO MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2025 |
| WASHINGTON SNF CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2025 |
| GILTNER, KODY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| JOHNSON, ALLEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| SERVOSS, KYLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
| SPIELMAN, SHIMON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $246K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505393. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.