Americana Health and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 91 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 58% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 49.3 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-05-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was consulted regarding a signification change in respiratory status and failed to notify the physician of the need for oxygen administration orders related to oxygen levels and obtain timely a needed seasonal allergy and asthma medication for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for notification of changes including a significant change in resident health status. Resident 1 experienced harm when hospitalization and intubation was required for respiratory failure related to untreated respiratory symptoms. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A facility policy, dated [DATE], and entitled Respiratory Care; Oxygen Administration documented the following: -- Oxygen is administered per physician order. Oxygen may be administered in the absence of a physician order in emergency situations. -- Oxygen saturations are obtained and documented as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to initiate bowel interventions for 5 of 8 residents (Resident 17, 24, 27, 2 & 6) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk for discomfort, experiencing health complications and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Record review of the facility policy, titled, Bowel Protocol, revision date, May 2025, documented: 1. The licensed Nurse reviews the bowel monitor daily. 2. If a resident does not have a bowel movement for three days, the nurse administers the physician ordered bowel program. 3. If the facility has no specific bowel program the nurse administers medications as ordered as follows: Administer milk of magnesia [laxative] per physician order on day four. If milk of magnesia offers no result, administer a stimulant laxative suppository or oral tablet (Bisacodyl, Senna, etc.) per physician order on the next shift, during waking hours only. If a resident continues to have no results from suppository, administer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0694 — pattern
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure intravenous (IV) access devices were assessed, maintained and monitored in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 1 & 46) reviewed for IV therapy. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified complications including loss of vascular access, infection, and other potential negative health outcomes.Findings included .Review of the facility's Vascular Access Devices and Infusion Therapy Procedures policy, dated August 2021, showed upon admission or insertion staff would measure the external length of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC, a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart), and the residents arm circumference 10 centimeter (cm) above the insertion site, to establish a baseline. The PICC external length and resident's arm circumference would then be measured weekly with PICC dressing changes. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were conveyed (the act of legally transferring property from one entity to another) to the Office of Financial Recovery (OFR) within 30 days of death or discharge for 1 of 2 discharged residents (Resident 62) reviewed for trust accounts. This failure resulted in a delayed final accounting and conveyance of Resident 62's funds.Findings included . Review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 02/18/2025, showed Resident 62 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], where they subsequently passed away on the same date. Review of the facility's resident Trust- Audit Report showed Resident 62 had a trust balance of $60 from March - August 2025. A Transmittal of Resident Personal Funds form showed Resident 62's trust balance was not conveyed to the OFR until 08/27/2025. During an interview on 11/20/2025 at 1:34 PM, when asked if Resident 62's trust balance was conveyed to the OFR within 30 days of death or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Safety Device Evaluation and Consent and/or physician's order for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 43) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed the residents at risk of injury, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Record review of the facility policy, titled, Physical Restraints, revision date, January 2025, documented: 5. The resident and/or resident representative is provided risks/benefits of restraint use or enabler/device use, and consent obtained prior to implementation of the device.6. The care plan is updated for the device use with the goal for the least restrictive measures.7. The care plan is evaluated quarterly and as needed.8. The resident is evaluated using Device Evaluation on admission, re-admission, annually, and with significant change in condition. Resident 43 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (an assessment tool), dated 09/24/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure admission Minimum Data Sets (MDS, an assessment tool) were completed within 14 days of admission as required, for 1 of 18 sample residents (Resident 2) reviewed for comprehensive assessments. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs.Findings included .Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.20.1 October 2025, showed admission assessments were required to be completed by the 14th calendar day of a resident's admission. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 07/19/2025, showed it was not completed until 08/05/2025 20 days after admission. On 11/21/2025 at 1:47 PM, when asked if Resident 2's admission MDS was completed by the 14th calendar day after admission as required, Staff D, MDS Coordinator, stated, No. Reference WAC 388-97-1000(1)(b)(c)(ii)(d).

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected residents' health status and care needs for 2 of 18 sample residents (Residents 6 & 2) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/ unmet care needs and decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 08/04/2024, showed Resident 6 had a terminal diagnosis and received hospice services. Review of the Hospice intake paperwork, dated 07/29/2024, showed due to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, an umbrella term for chronic lung diseases that cause airflow obstruction and breathing difficulties), respiratory failure and hypoxia (deficiency in the amount of oxygen reaching the tissues) Resident 6 was determined to have a life expectancy of less than six months and was admitted to Hospice. Hospice documentation showed Resident 6 was repeatedly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected residents' care needs for 3 of 18 residents (Residents 1, 2 & 46) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for unidentified/ unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the electronic health record (EMR) showed an order, dated 07/21/2025, to cleanse Resident 2's anal fissure (a small tear in the thin, moist tissue that lines the anus) with normal saline or wound cleanser, pat dry, and apply zinc oxide ointment (skin protectant) twice a day and as needed. Review of the comprehensive care plan, intiated 07/17/2025, showed no care plan was developed to address Resident 2's anal fissure. During an interview on 11/21/2025 at 2:48 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services (DON), said Resident 2's anal fissure should have been addressed in the comprehensive care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 3 of 18 residents (Residents 1, 2 & 46). Failure of nursing staff to follow and/or clarify physicians' orders when indicated, and to notify the physician of weight variances and when medications were held, placed residents at risk delayed changes in medication regimen, hypotension, falls and other adverse outcomes. Findings included .1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's physician's orders showed an order for daily weights, dated 10/25/2025. Review of Residnt 1's November 2025 weight record showed Resident 1 had the following 24-hour weight variances:11/08/2025 weight - 272.6 lbs.; 11/09/2025 - 264.4 lbs. (-8.2 lbs. in 24 hours).11/11/2025 - 262.2 lbs.; 11/12/2025 - 252.2 lbs. (- 10 lbs. in 24 hours).11/14/2025 - 252.2 lbs.; 11/15/2025 - 268 lbs. (+16 lbs. in 24 hours). Review of Resident 1's electronic medical record (EMR) showed no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for limited Range of Motion (ROM) received treatment and services to maintain and/or improve ROM. The failure to ensure residents were offered/provided Restorative Nursing Programs (RNPs) at the frequency they were assessed to require, placed residents at risk for decline in ROM, contracture formation, reduction in strength and mobility, increased dependence on staff and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed Resident 2 was cognitively intact and received a passive ROM RNP on two of seven days during the assessment period. Review of Resident 2's impaired mobility related to decreased ROM care plan, revise 09/15/2025, showed Resident 2 was to receive passive ROM to both lower extremities, two sets of 15 reps (hip flexion, hip abduction, heel sliders and ankle pumps) five times a week. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated when opened in 1 of 2 kitchen refrigerators, and in 1 of 1 nourishment refrigerators/freezers reviewed for proper food storage. This failure placed residents at risk for cross-contamination, food borne illness, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility's policy entitled, Nursing Unit Refrigerator Storage Guide, updated 03/2018, documented, Label all resident food with Name, Room Number, Use By Date. Packaged foods when opened are labeled with use by date. The manufacturer's expiration date is the 'Use By' for unopened items. Use by dates should not exceed the manufacturer's expiration or best 'use by' date. <Kitchen Refrigerator> On 12/12/2024 at 10:18 AM, the top left corner of the kitchen walk in refrigerator was observed with the following undated, unlabeled, used items: 1. Plastic bag of celery sticks 2. Plastic bag of carrot sticks with RO [received on] 10/04/2024 written on the bag 3. Cardboard box containing Rosemary, dated 12/07/2024 At…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $120K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA