Milton Freewater Health And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

30.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 30.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 31.8 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.16 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.04 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.60 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.32 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow care planned interventions related to transfers for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for safety. As a result, Resident 13 experienced an injury of unknown origin and internal bleeding, which required hospitalization and a blood transfusion. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with diagnoses including acute post-hemorrhagic anemia (a condition where a person experiences a rapid decrease in red blood cells and hemoglobin due to significant blood loss) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 13's MDS Quarterly dated 7/7/25 revealed a BIMS score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident 13's care plan dated 7/13/25 revealed she/he was completely dependent for transfers and required a two person assist with a mechanical lift (Hoyer sling). On 7/29/25 and 7/30/25, two public complaints were received by the State Survey Agency (SSA) which stated Resident 13 received an injury of unknown origin on her/his chest area and the resident experienced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to prevent drug diversion for 2 of 2 residents (#s 29 and 38) reviewed for misappropriation. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation of personal medications. Findings include:A facility policy regarding misappropriation dated 3/2025 stated the following:Each resident has the right to be free from misappropriation of resident property.Misappropriation of resident property includes diversion of a resident's medications for staff use or personal gain.1. Resident 38 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including loss of a lower extremity below the knee as result of frost bite.A 10/22/25 Physician Order stated hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg to be provided as needed to address Resident 38's pain.An 11/11/25 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 28 had normal cognitive function.Review of Resident 38's 11/2025 MAR revealed Resident 38 was documented as having received four doses of hydrocodone-acetaminophen at the following times on 11/20/25: 1:38 AM, 6:56 AM, 7:00 PM, and 11:30 PM.An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects. Findings include:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with diagnoses including pneumonia (an infection of the lungs) and unspecified convulsions.Resident 1's 11/24/25 Annual MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact.Resident 1's 10/2025 MAR indicated the resident was to have levetiracetam (an anticonvulsant) twice a day for unspecified convulsions. Review of Resident 1's medical record revealed the following laboratory order:- 10/4/25 levetiracetam level for two days, must be done before resident takes morning dose. Review of Resident 1's 10/2025 MAR revealed she/he did not receive levetiracetam on 10/4/25, 10/5/25 and 10/6/25. Medication administration resumed on 10/7/25.The Facility's investigation dated 10/6/25 included the following:- On 10/6/25 it was noted Resident 1's levetiracetam was not active on her/his MAR.- Resident 1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for urinary catheter received appropriate services when staff failed to ensure catheter tubing did not touch the floor. This failure placed residents at increased risk for urinary tract infections (UTIs) and its associated complications. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website's 6/27/25 Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) Basics revealed a CAUTI occurs when germs enter the urinary tract through a urinary catheter and cause infection. Heathcare workers and facilities can prevent CAUTIs and protect patients with proper infection control processes. The CDC's undated Indwelling Urinary Catheter Insertion and Maintenance Guide instructed urine bags to be kept off the floor and for staff to incorporate observation of urinary catheter and bag into routine rounds. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with diagnoses including presence of urogenital implants (having artificial devices in the urinary or reproductive organs,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident care needs for 3 of 3 residents (#s 1, 8 and 22) reviewed for sufficient and competent staffing. This placed residents at risk for delayed and unmet care needs. Findings include:1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with diagnoses including colon cancer. Resident 8's 12/25/25 admission MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact.Resident 8's 1/12/26 Care Plan indicated the resident was to be offered a shower each day during dayshift and she/he required assistance from two staff for showers. A review of Resident 8's Bathing Task Log from 12/20/25 to 1/13/26 revealed bathing activity did not occur on 12/20/25, 12/28/25, 1/2/26, 1/4/26, 1/6/26, 1/12/26 and 1/13/26. On 1/13/26 at 11:13 AM, Staff 14 (CNA) stated she worked dayshift at the facility, and they were short-staffed during her shift today. Staff 14 stated on days when they were short staffed, she was not able to complete all of her assigned responsibilities, including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary antibiotic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#22) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms and other serious infections. Findings include: The facility's 3/2018 Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Policy directed the following:-Applicable SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation, a structured communication tool used by healthcare professionals to quickly and effectively convey critical patient information) tools are utilized to guide clinicians in the evaluation of clinical signs and symptoms potentially indicative of infection. -The clinical rationale to support the use of antibiotics, if using outside current clinical guidelines, is to be documented.-Communication with the resident and/or resident representative regarding the treatment plan and appropriate use of antibiotics is to be documented. -The DNS or IP is to collaborate with providers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse and psychosocial harm. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Policy, updated in 3/2025, defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Physical abuse was defined as hitting, slapping, punching, choking, pinching, biting, kicking, throwing objects, grabbing and shoving.Resident 10 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including stroke and dysphagia (inability to swallow). Resident 10's MDS Quarterly dated 11/7/24 revealed a BIMS score of 99, indicating the assessment could not be completed. Resident 10's Care Plan revised on 12/29/24, revealed she/he had verbal and physical aggression toward others and behaviors such as pulling or knocking things off walls and counters and unsafe behaviors during mealtime. Care plan interventions included providing distractions, to monitor and cue the resident at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the appropriate State agency within state mandated timelines for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for accidents and falls. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with diagnoses including acute post-hemorrhagic anemia (a condition where a person experiences a rapid decrease in red blood cells and hemoglobin due to significant blood loss) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 13's MDS Quarterly dated 7/7/25 revealed a BIMS score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident 13's care plan dated 7/13/25 revealed she/he was completely dependent for transfers and required a two person assist with a Hoyer sling. On 7/29/25 and 7/30/25, two public complaints were received by the State Survey Agency (SSA) which stated Resident 13 had received an injury of unknown origin on her/his chest area and the resident experienced significant bruising, swelling at the chest area and was not sent to the hospital for several days…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to respond to a change of condition related to anticoagulant use for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of anticoagulant use. Findings include: According to Drugs.com https://www.drugs.com/, serious side effects of anticoagulant medication include bleeding, with common adverse reactions including anemia, hemorrhage, and nausea.Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with diagnoses including acute post-hemorrhagic anemia (a condition where a person experiences a rapid decrease in red blood cells and hemoglobin due to significant blood loss) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 13's MDS Quarterly dated 7/7/25 revealed a BIMS score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident 13's care plan dated 7/13/25 revealed she/he was completely dependent for transfers and required a two person assist with a mechanical lift (Hoyer sling). The care plan also indicated the resident received an anticoagulant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nursing staff available to provide the necessary care and services to meet residents' needs in 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: On 6/23/24 the facility had a census of 26 residents. On 6/27/24, Staff 2 (DNS) provided a list of residents who: -Required two-person mechanical lift transfers: 13; -Required one or two-person extensive or total assistance for bathing: 21; -Required one or two-person extensive or total assistance for toileting: 18; -Required one or two-person extensive or total assistance for dressing: 22; -Required two person assistance at all times for all care: 3; -Had behavioral healthcare needs which required monitoring: 19; -Were at risk for elopement: 5. Observations from 6/23/24 through 6/27/24 between the hours of 8:00 AM and 11:15 PM revealed multiple times when no CNA staff were visualized in the hallways for up to 30 minutes. On 6/23/24 at 12:34 PM, Resident 2 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were given the right to participate in the development of their person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#2) reviewed for care planning. This placed residents at risk for not being involved in the care planning process. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with diagnoses including major depression and repeated falls. A review of Resident 2's health record revealed Resident 2 had not had a care conference completed since 11/9/23. A review of Resident 2's care plan revealed on 2/7/24, 3/5/24, 3/6/24 and 5/10/24, Resident 2's care plan was updated. On 6/23/24 at 12:36 PM, 6/24/24 at 11:55 AM, and 6/26/24 at 9:09 AM, Resident 2 stated with dissatisfaction, her/his most recent care conference was sometime last year. Resident 2 stated it was important for her/him to be involved in her/his care planning process and other residents participated regularly in care conferences so she/he did not understand why she/he had not had a care conference since last…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-08-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $100K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR