Life Care Center Of Westminster

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 90.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 79.9 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards for one (#1) of three residents out of eight sample residents.Resident #1, who had a history of falls and previous fractures that included a right humerus (long bone in the upper arm) fracture, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 3/1/26 at 3:30 a.m. Resident #1, who required maximum assistance from staff with transfers, fell out of bed. Registered nurse (RN) #1 heard a loud sound and found Resident #1 on the floor next to her bed lying on her left side in a somewhat fetal position partially on the fall mat. The bed was raised in a high position. RN #1's initial assessment revealed Resident #1's blood pressure was 184/95 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and she had no injuries. (A normal blood pressure is generally below 120/80 mmHg). Neurological monitoring was initiated. The resident was placed back into bed without a thorough head to toe assessment completed. RN #1 failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#41) of five residents reviewed for pressure injuries out of 33 sample residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers from developing. Resident #41 was admitted on [DATE] for long term care. At the time of his admission, the resident was identified as being at risk for developing pressure injuries and he did not have any pressure injuries upon admission. On 12/2/24 the facility documented Resident #41 had a new wound with an open area on his left inner heel measuring 3.0 centimeters (cm) by 0.9 cm. The facility failed to implement preventative measures to protect the resident's heels after the development of the left heel wound on 12/2/24. On 12/4/24 a nurse progress note indicated Resident #41 had an unstageable pressure wound to his left heel. On 12/10/24 the resident was seen by a wound care physician (WCP) who classified the resident's left heel wound as an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-06-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents out of three sample residents was kept free from neglect. Resident #1, who had a known history of falls and was dependent on staff for transfers, had a documented plan of care which required the assistance of two staff members for transfers with a mechanical lift. The resident was unable to perform a stand and pivot transfer related to her diagnosis of cerebral palsy (affects the body movement, muscle control, reflexes, posture and balance). On 1/26/24 a facility certified nurse aide (CNA) requested assistance from an agency CNA to help transfer Resident #1 from a shower chair to the resident's wheelchair with a mechanical lift. Despite Resident #1 and the facility CNA informing the agency staff that the resident was a mechanical lift transfer, the agency CNA proceeded to transfer Resident #1 by herself by standing the resident up and pivoting her to the wheelchair. Per Resident #1, when the agency CNA transferred…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-05-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (#163) of one resident reviewed out of 32 sample residents. Resident #163 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of open wound to right and left foot, infections of skin and subcutaneous tissue (deepest layer of the skin mostly made of fat and connective tissue), osteomyelitis (infection in bone), and diabetes mellitus. The 4/21/22 pain assessment revealed the resident had pain to her right and left heel. Her most recent pain level was a 7 out of 10 (with 10 being the worst pain on a scale), and her acceptable pain level was a 3 out of 10. The assessment documented movement and dressing changes made the pain worse, and rest made the pain better. It further documented the pain affected her sleep and rest,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure prompt action was taken to resolve grievances from a group. Specifically, the facility failed to resolve residents' concerns regarding not enough floor staff to provide care such as showers, call light wait times and no hot water for showers. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Grievance Program (Concern and Comment) policy, reviewed 9/25/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/1/25 at 5:47 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents and their families have the right to file a complaint without fear of reprisal. Upon request, the facility must give a copy of the grievance policy to the resident. Resident's rights should be protected when voicing complaints to maximize the quality of life for each individual and to promote customer satisfaction with facility care and services. The Concern and Comment Program is utilized to address the concerns of the residents, family members and visitors. Ensure that residents and families receive upon admission information on the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#61, #15 and #28) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications out of 33 sample residents were as free from unnecessary medication as possible. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #15 and Resident #61 had appropriate mood and behavior monitoring in place for their psychotropic medication in order to justify and determine effectiveness of the medications; -Ensure Resident #15 had the proper diagnoses for the use of an antipsychotic (a class of drugs used to treat psychosis, particularly in conditions like schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) medication; -Provide a physician's clinical rationale to justify the use of two antidepressant medications for Resident #28; and, -Ensure Resident #28, who slept eight to 16 hours per day, was appropriately monitored and reassessed by the physician to provide a justification for the ongoing use of trazodone (an antidepressant medication often used for insomnia) together…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (%). Specifically, the facility's medication error rate was 13%, which was four errors out of 29 opportunities for error. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., et.al., Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 ed. (2020), E.[NAME], St. Louis Missouri, page 606-607, retrieved on 4/16/24, Take appropriate actions to ensure the patient receives medication as prescribed and within the times prescribed and in the appropriate environment. Professional Standards such as nursing scope and standards of practice apply to the activity of medication administration. To prevent medication errors, follow the seven rights of medication administration consistently every time you administer medications. Many medication errors can be linked in some way to an inconsistency in adhering to these seven rights: the right medication, the right dose, the right patient,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0943 — pattern
  Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide training to their staff that at a minimum educates staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property as set forth, procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of resident property and resident abuse prevention for five of five staff members reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aide (CNA) #1, CNA #2, CNA #3, registered nurse (RN) #1 and licensed practical nurse (LPN) #1 received annual abuse identification, prevention and reporting training in the past 12 calendar months. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse Prevention policy, last reviewed on 6/17/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/28/25 at 4:06 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, All employees will receive orientation and ongoing training on abuse prevention and reporting. Orientation program will include a review of facility's policy on what constitutes abuse, neglect,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to honor resident choices for two (#53 and #26) of four residents reviewed out of 33 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #53 and Resident #26's recevied showers consistently according to the resident's choices and plan of care. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Rights policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/1/25 at 5:47 p.m. It read in pertinent part, A resident is afforded certain rights while residing in a long-term care facility. The facility and its associates have the responsibility for ensuring these rights are always upheld by the resident in their care. The facility must provide equal access to quality care regardless of diagnosis, severity of condition or payment source. II. Resident #53 A. Resident status Resident #53, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the May 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included inflammatory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#28) of five residents reviewed for grievances out of 33 sample residents was provided prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to promptly resolve Resident #28's grievance regarding care provided by certified nurse aide (CNA) #3. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Grievances policy and procedure, reviewed June 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/1/25 at 4:00 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Residents and their families have the right to file a complaint without fear of reprisal. Upon request, the facility must give a copy of the grievance policy to the resident. Residents' rights should be protected when voicing complaints to maximize the quality of life for each individual and to promote customer satisfaction with facility care and services. The resident has the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide services in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one (#28) of five residents reviewed for medication management out of 33 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #28 was administered medications per physician's orders in April 2025. Findings include: I. Resident #28 A. Resident status Resident #28, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the May 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbations, morbid obesity, asthma, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rate), congestive heart failure, anxiety disorder, depression, chronic kidney disease, insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea. The 2/11/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. II. Resident interview Resident #28 was interviewed on 4/28/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to act upon recommendations by the pharmacist in a timely manner for one (#15) of five residents out of 33 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the physician documented that he or she reviewed the pharmacist's identified monthly drug regimen review irregularities and documented the actions taken or not taken to address the irregularities for Resident #15. Findings include: I. Resident #15 A. Resident status Resident #15, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the May 2025 CPO, diagnoses included altered mental status and depression. The 3/5/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15. She required set-up assistance for oral hygiene and upper body dressing. She required supervision for lower body dressing. The MDS assessment revealed the resident had mild depression with a score of six out of 27. The MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop an antibiotic stewardship program that promotes the appropriate use of antibiotics and includes a system of monitoring to improve resident outcomes and reduce antibiotic resistance for two (#41 and #35) of five residents out of 33 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a physician's rationale for the use of long-term antibiotics was provided for Resident #41 and Resident #35. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Antibiotic Prescribing and Usage in Hospitals and Long-term Care, dated 2019, was retrieved on 5/2/25 from https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/hcp/core-elements/hospital.html. It read in pertinent part, Implement policies that apply in all situations to support antibiotic prescribing to include specifying the dose, duration and indication for all courses of antibiotics so that they are readily identifiable. Implement facility specific…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence for two (#1 and #3) of three residents out of three sample residents Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents' call lights were answered in a timely manner. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Resident Rights policy and procedure, revised on 9/10/24, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/11/24 at 11:54 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part At the time of admission and periodically throughout their stay, the facility will inform each resident, orally and in writing, of their rights. The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$47,398 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $17,215 — penalty dated 2026-03-19
• $21,359 — penalty dated 2025-05-01
• $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-06-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO