Life Care Center Of Sarasota

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 379 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 92.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 162 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 106.5 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall resulting in major injury and hospitalization for one resident (#11) of two residents reviewed.Findings Included:Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing. Other diagnoses included encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, end stage renal disease, history of falling, and repeated falls.Review of a hospital history and physical for Resident #11 dated 09/09/2025 showed .the patient presented from nursing facility after having an outpatient X-ray that showed a femoral neck fracture. It was reported the patient had a fall on Saturday and had evaluation outpatient. Patient was complaining of hip pain while at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident (#100) of thirty-nine sampled residents with a bed that met his height needs and comfort during three days (9/8/2025, 9/9/2025 and 9/10/2025) of four days observed. Findings included: On 9/8/2025 at 10:45 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. Resident #100 was visited while in his room. Both times observed, he was noted lying flat in bed with his head on a pillow. Further observations revealed Resident #100 was utilizing a mechanical air loss mattress system with bolsters on each side of the bed. The residents both feet were either pressed up against the end of the foot board or positioned on top of the foot board. Photographic evidence was taken with permission from Resident #100's wife, who was his decision maker.On 9/9/2025 at 8:30 a.m. and at 9:40 a.m., Resident #100's feet were observed propped up and pressed up against the end of the foot board. It appeared Resident #100 was tall in stature and not fitting comfortably in the bed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for one resident (#11) of two residents sampled.Findings Included: On 09/09/2025 at 03:05 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff M Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Unit Manager (UM), of the Manatee unit. Staff M stated Resident #11 experienced a fall on 09/06/2025. Staff M stated the fall was not observed by staff. Staff M stated resident #11 went to the hospital on [DATE] after the resident complained of pain and an x-ray showed the resident had a hip fracture.On 09/10/2025 at 04:18 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff R, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Staff R explained seeing Resident #11 on the floor on the right side of the resident's bed and laying on their right side. Staff R stated Resident #11 was not seen falling to the floor. Staff R stated Resident #11 complained of pain while receiving a bed bath.On 09/10/2025 at 04:39 p.m.an interview was conducted with Staff S, Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to the use of orthotics for one resident (#100) of two residents reviewed during three days (9/8/2025, 9/9/2025, and 9/10/2025) of four days observed. Findings included: During multiple tours conducted on 9/8/2025 between 10:45 a.m. and 2:45 p.m., and on 9/10/2025 at 7:30 a.m. and at 9:50 a.m., Resident #100 was observed in his room lying in bed with no Right-hand splint/brace/hand carrot on and no heel protector boots on either of his feet. On 9/9/2025 at 9:40 a.m. an interview with Resident #100's family member who revealed they visited the resident daily. The family member Resident #100 was six feet four inches and that he lies in bed all day, by choice and his feet are always scrunched up against or positioned on top of the foot board. The family member revealed the resident had wounds on his heels and are being treated but did not think having his feet pressed up against or placed on top of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to to ensure care was provided in accordance with professional standards related to the use of orthotics for one resident (#100) of two residents reviewed during three days (9/8/2025, 9/9/2025, and 9/10/2025) of four days observed.Findings included: During multiple tours conducted on 9/8/2025 between 10:45 a.m. and 2:45 p.m., and on 9/10/2025 at 7:30 a.m. and at 9:50 a.m., Resident #100 was observed in his room lying in bed with no Right-hand splint/brace/hand carrot on and no heel protector boots on either of his feet. On 9/9/2025 at 9:40 a.m. an interview with Resident #100's family member who revealed they visited the resident daily. The family member Resident #100 was six feet four inches and that he lies in bed all day, by choice and his feet are always scrunched up against or positioned on top of the foot board. The family member revealed the resident had wounds on his heels and are being treated but did not think having his feet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. Thirty medication opportunities were observed, and four errors were identified for our residents (#39, #41, #71 and #88) out of eight residents resulting in an error rate of 13.33%. Findings included: On 9/9/25 at 8:32 a.m., Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) was observed administering medication to Resident #39. Staff D, RN administered the following medications: Xanax 0.5mg (milligrams), Lexapro 20mg, losartan potassium 50mg, tamsulosin 0.4 mg and Lantus SoloStar pen injector. Staff D, RN dialed the dosage selector to 20 units on the Lantus SoloStar pen injector, cleaned the needle injector port with alcohol and inserted the needle into the injector port. Staff D, RN entered Resident #39's room prepared the injection site and administered the medication. When asked about priming the insulin injector pen Staff D, RN said, I don't do that.Review of Resident #39's admission record showed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and the Plan of Correction (POC) review, the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) failed to implement an effective plan of correction to correct deficient practice identified during the recertification survey originally conducted 9/11/2025 to 9/18/2025 as evidenced by: 1) to ensure two of six sampled residents (#2 and #10) had updated care plan interventions in place related to falls and 2) failed to: 1) prevent a fall with major injury for two Residents (#1 and #2) and, 2) prevent multiple falls for one Resident (#10) out of four residents sampled for injuries and accidents. Cross reference F656 and F689 Findings included:1)Review of the facility's plan of correction for the survey ending on 9/18/2025 with a completion date of 10/18/2025 revealed the following measure would be taken to correct the deficient practice which was identified at F656:(4) How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put in place;The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent one resident (#1) from exposure to the sun/heat, resulting in an altered mental status and skin damage to the legs, arms, and head, out of three residents sampled for outdoor activities. On 5/2/2025 Resident #1 was seated in a wheelchair in the courtyard area of the facility for approximately one hour from 2:45 p.m. to 3:45 p.m., during the hottest part of the day. Resident #1 was discovered to be unresponsive and had to be transferred to a higher level of care for treatment from sun/heat exposure. Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses including; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with neuropathy and chronic kidney disease, heart failure, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, dementia, cardiac pacemaker, and need for assistance with personal care. A review of the quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-04-13 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to 1.) ensure the accuracy of a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I for three (Residents #97, #43 and #13) of five residents admitted with mental health diagnoses and sampled for PASARR; and 2.) complete a PASARR Level II within 30 days for one (Resident #20) admitted to the facility under a 'hospital discharge exemption' of five residents sampled for PASARR. Findings include: 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and a primary diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], for Resident #97 revealed under Section I, diagnoses that included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Anxiety and Psychotic Disorder; and under Section N, antipsychotic and antidepressant medications were received during seven of the past seven days. Review of a PASARR Level I dated 11/28/2022, revealed Section 1A with Depressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I upon a new qualifying mental health diagnosis for one (Resident #3) of five residents sampled for PASARRs . Findings included: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Resident #3 did not have psychiatric or mood disorder diagnosis indicated. Review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] Section I, showed the resident had current diagnosis of Depression. Review of an admission record for Resident #3 dated 04/13/23, showed a diagnosis of depression, unspecified with an onset date of 12/23/22. Review of a physician order summary report for Resident #3 dated 04/13/23, showed Resident #3 was receiving Fluoxetine HCI (hydrochloride), give one tablet by mouth one time a day for depression. Review of Resident #3's PASSAR Level I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$18,780 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $6,380 — penalty dated 2025-09-18
• $12,400 — penalty dated 2025-09-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL