Life Care Center Of Hilo
944 West Kawailani Street, Hilo, HI 96720 · For profit - Corporation · 252 certified beds · (808) 959-9151 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,492 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-01)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.8% | 16.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.4% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.4% | 1.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 1.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.0% | 20.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.0% | 9.1% | 18.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.6% | 17.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.8% | 11.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.2% | 84.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 9.1% | 19.4% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.1% | 10.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.37 | 1.09 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.16 | 0.88 | 1.80 | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
65.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 166 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 65.3%CMS range 58.7–73.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.2–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 75.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 76.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 65.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 4.3–10.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 252 beds and averages 229.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.14 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-04-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide effective and timely pain management to a resident experiencing pain. Resident (R) 10 complained of pain 10 out of 10 (10/10 on the pain scale, indicating severe, intense agony) to the lower back after being in a wheelchair (w/c). The physician ordered an opioid medication at 01:47 PM, which was not administered until 09:00 PM, despite the resident's sustained pain level 8/10, which is severe. The delay in administration of an effective medication, the absence of non-pharmacological intervention, failure to seek higher level of care due to unrelieved pain caused R10 to experience unrelieved severe pain for 7.15 hours. As a result of this deficient practice, residents are at risk of physical harm. Findings include: Cross Reference to F609- Reporting of Alleged Violations & F610- Investigate Alleged Violations.On [DATE] at 09:06 AM conducted a review of R10's Electronic Health Record (EHR). R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown source was reported immediately to the State Agency (SA), but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, which resulted in serious bodily injury. Resident (R) 10 sustained a serious injury of unknown origin to the Right Lower Extremity (RLE). The facility did not report the injury of unknown origin to the SA. As a result of this deficient practice, residents are at risk for the potential of harm. Findings include: Cross Reference to F610: Investigate and F697: Pain ManagementOn 03/25/26 at 10:15 AM, reviewed the facility profile in the IQIES database. The database did not contain a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), initial or completed report, for the injury identified on R10's RLE. On 03/30/26 at 01:15 PM, conducted a review of R10's Electronic Health Record (EHR). The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Nursing admission Tool completed on 02/02/26 at 12:50 PM, which is the nursing admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin to rule out the potential for abuse. Resident (R) 10 sustained a serious injury of unknown origin to the Right Lower Extremity (RLE). An investigation was not conducted into the origin of the injury and potential for abuse was not ruled out. As a result of this deficient practice, all residents are at risk for potential abuse until a thorough investigation is completed. Findings include: Cross Reference to F609- Reporting to the State Agency and F697- Pain ManagementOn 03/30/26 at 01:15 PM, conducted a review of R10's Electronic Health Record (EHR). The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Nursing admission Tool completed on 02/02/26 at 12:50 PM, which is the nursing admission assessment, documented A. Skin Conditions documented a rash on the lower back, pink discoloration 15 x 14 cm, tip of nose 1.3 x 1 cm scab (malignant neoplasm) toenails with onychomycosis on the left greater toe avulsed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record/document review, the facility failed to provide supervision to one resident (R)1, of a sample size of three, who was left alone in the facility van for an unknown period of time. As a result of this deficient practice, R1 was left in an unsafe environment with a high potential for negative physical and/or mental health outcomes. This deficient practice could affect any resident that used the transport van. After the event, the facility implemented interventions to reduce the risk of a similar event in the future and met the criteria for past noncompliance. Findings include: 1) R1 was a [AGE] year-old female resident at the facility since her readmission on [DATE]. Her past pertinent medical history included hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, dementia without behavioral disturbance, generalized weakness, and end stage renal disease. P1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) on the MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) dated 03/22/2025 was five, which suggest severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to assure residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being during meals times and during Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for multiple residents on the second floor. Resident (R)203 reported having to wait up to an hour for staff to assist the resident to the bathroom due to insufficient staffing. An Anonymous Resident (AR) complained to Family Member (FM)1 about waiting for approximately 30 minutes for staff to answer the call light for assistance to the toilet, then staff rushing the resident off the toilet due to having to go and assist another resident, and staff not having enough time to assist the resident with meals due to the resident's slow pace of eating. Interviews with four anonymous direct care staff, on the second floor, confirmed there is not sufficient staff to assist residents on the second floor during mealtimes and with ADLs due to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to be treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 10 residents (Resident (R)14 and R43) sampled for dignity. R14 was left unattended in his bed with a towel loosely tied around his neck. R14 was left in bed wearing a T-shirt and adult brief uncovered with privacy curtain open while his roommate had a visitor present in the room. Staff did not promote R43's dignity while dining as evidenced by lunch observations on 11/28/23 and 11/29/23 during which Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)48 stood over R43 while assisting the resident lunch. As a result of this deficient practice, resident's are at risk for more than minimal psychosocial harm. Findings include: 1) On 11/28/23 at 11:30 AM while rounding with residents observed R14 alone in his room, laying in bed with a towel tied loosely around his neck. Went to the corridor to find facility staff to inquire about this and found the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). Surveyor and ADON walked into R14's room and stood at his bedside, observing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide a clean environment for 1 of 35 Residents sampled, as evidenced by a portable fan positioned on the dresser of Resident (R)32 circulating air around his room, with a layer of dust on the front and back covers. In addition, the facility failed to provide a clean environment for the ground floor unit residents with water dripping from air conditioning ducts. Findings include: While doing rounds on the first day of survey, 11/28/23, observed that R32 had a portable fan in his room that was sitting on top of his dresser. Fan appeared dirty with dust noted on the front and back cover. On 11/30/23 at 09:57 AM, went back to R32's room to observe if the portable fan was still in his room. Observed R32's portable fan was on and circulating air around his room. The front and back cover of R32's portable fan had a layer of dust. At this time inquired with housekeeper(H)5 to see who cleans the residents' fans. H5 said the janitors are responsible to clean the fans, and stated that there are two janitors working every day.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a comprehensive assessment of medications for 1 of 35 residents (R) in the sample. Findings include: On 11/29/23 at 01:42 PM, during a record review of Resident (R)7's electronic health record (EHR), noted that on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/19/23, R7 had been documented as having taken insulin 1 day of the 7-day look back period. Further review of R7's EHR revealed no active, discontinued, or completed orders for insulin. On 11/30/23 at 03:43 PM, an interview was done with MDS Coordinator (MDSC)2 in the second-floor Conference Room. MDSC2 confirmed that he had completed R7's admission Assessment. After a concurrent review of R7's EHR, MDSC2 confirmed that R7 had never been on insulin. MDSC2 could not explain why he marked R7 as having taken insulin, but agreed that he probably mistook another medication R7 was taking as insulin.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively care plan and manage constipation for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 7) sampled. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 7 experienced stool impaction(s) that had to be manually removed, causing her pain, distress, and embarrassment. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility at risk of constipation. Findings include: Resident (R)7 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a urinary tract infection (UTI). Her admitting diagnoses include, but are not limited to, constipation, history of transient ischemic attack [(TIA) a temporary period of symptoms similar to those of a stroke], history of cerebral infarction (an area of tissue death in the brain caused by a blockage of blood vessels), chronic pain syndrome, and a history of falling. Admitting medication orders include: Senna 8.6 mg (milligrams)- One tablet as needed (prn) for no bowel movement (BM) after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) Record Review (RR) of R14's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found his diagnoses include, but are not limited to, history of traumatic brain injury, other muscle spasms, contracture to right and left hand. Fall risk assessments (NRSG: Fall Risk Evaluation) for R14 were completed quarterly on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE] and all have resident rated as a high risk for falls with a score of 14 each time. On the NRSG: Fall Risk Evaluation, a score of 10 or more is considered a high risk for falls. R14's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) that was dated [DATE] has resident listed as dependent on staff for mobility. R14 is totally dependent on staff for his care. On [DATE] at 11:30 AM, entered R14's room and observed R14 was alone, no staff were present in the room with him. At this time, noted resident's bed was raised off the ground to almost hip height. After requesting the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) to come into R14's room, inquired why R14's bed was not left in the lowest position near the ground,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that records for controlled medications are in order and that an accurate account is maintained and reconciled. The staff did not document the actual amount of medication in the container, and signed off on medications not yet administered. As a result of this deficiency, there is a potential for the diversion of a controlled medication. Findings include: On 11/30/23 at 09:28 AM, inspection of the medication cart in the first-floor South unit was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)11. Review of the controlled medication log revealed that the remaining count for the sedative Lorazepam 0.25 milligrams (mg) was 48. The actual count in the blister pack was observed to be 49. LPN11 confirmed that the physical count and the amount documented in the log did not match. LPN 11 confirmed that he signed off on the medication when he gave it to the resident earlier in the morning but was supposed to give two pills. LPN11 added that he will give the other pill so the resident will get the full dose as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Glucose Control Solutions used in the facility were labeled in accordance with professional standards and facility policy, and failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals are secured in a locked compartment. Proper labeling of Glucose Control Solutions is necessary to ensure the efficacy of the solutions used to test the facility's glucose monitors/test strips for accuracy. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility requiring point-of-care blood glucose tests. Findings include: 1) On [DATE] at 09:15 AM, the 3 South medication cart was inspected with Registered Nurse (RN)27 standing by. Observed an unlabeled box of Glucose Control Solution. RN27 validated that the box should have been labeled with the date it was opened as the solution(s) were considered expired 90 days after opening. RN27 stated he would discard the opened box and put a new one in the cart. 2) On 11//30/23 at 09:28 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor the temperatures to ensure the dishes used to serve food were appropriately sanitized in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice placed all the residents in the facility at risk for possible foodborne illnesses. Findings include: On 11/28/23 at 09:52 AM, initial tour of the kitchen area was conducted with Food Service Director (FSD). Observed clipboards on the wall by the dishwashing machine area. FSD said that was where the staff document the temperatures for the dishwasher. Review of the log titled High Temperature Dish Machine Log was done and noted an entry for 11/13/23 was missing. Below the space where the staff write the month and year for the log, the document stated, Check and record temperatures results before washing dishes. Wash needs to be per manufacturers' specification and rinse at 180 degrees to 194 degrees Fahrenheit. Asked FSD how often the staff record the temperatures on the log. FSD said the staff record it three times a day when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreements ([NAME]) they asked the residents (or their representatives) to enter into, were explained in a form and manner that they could understand, and that the [NAME] explicitly granted the residents/representatives the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing it. This is evidenced by 1 of 3 residents (Resident 7) sampled stating she did not have the BAA explained to her in a way that she understood what it meant, 2 of 3 residents (Residents 7 and 101) sampled could not remember signing it or what it was about, and the Facility BAA granting residents only 10 days to rescind. Findings include: 1). On 11/29/23 at 12:08 PM, an interview was done with Resident (R)7 at her bedside. When asked about the BAA, R7 reported that the Director of Social Services (SSD) had visited her earlier that morning and asked her about the BAA as well, showing her a blank copy of the form. R7 stated that she told SSD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a Resident Council interview and policy review, the facility failed to protect and promote quality of life for the residents by ensuring they were treated with respect and dignity. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that English was consistently spoken in all resident care areas, exposing residents to frustrating and awkward situations that impede their ability to attain or maintain their highest practicable well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Findings include: On 11/17/22 at 09:20 AM, an interview was done with two regularly-attending members of the Resident Council, and one former member and interested resident. The interview was conducted in the second floor private Dining Room. All three residents complained that numerous kitchen staff, certified nurse aides (CNAs), and housekeepers speak to each other in front of the residents in their native language, a language other than English. It was reported that these staff members speak in their native tongue all the time even though they know they not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0575 — patternPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the required postings were placed in a manner accessible to all residents and resident representatives. Specifically, there were no postings observed on the first floor listing the contact information for pertinent State agencies and resident advocacy groups, nor were there any postings observed on the first floor regarding a resident's right to file a complaint with the State Survey Agency (SA). In addition, despite the required postings being available on the second and third floor, not all residents residing there are aware where to find them. As a result, residents who have the capacity to comprehend their resident rights potentially are not aware of them, how to exercise them, or where they can find information about them. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility with the functional capacity to exercise their resident rights. Findings include: On 11/14/22 at 12:45 PM, observations were made on the One South unit that there were no postings found regarding resident rights…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to make information on how to file a grievance or complaint available to all residents. Specifically, there were no postings observed on the first floor providing information on how to file a grievance for the first two days of the survey, nor were there comment cards available on the first floor to assist a resident in filing a written complaint or grievance. As a result, the process of filing a grievance is unclear for residents and resident representatives residing on the first floor. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents with the functional capacity to file a grievance. Findings include: On 11/14/22 at 12:45 PM, observations were made on the One South unit that there were no postings found regarding how to file a grievance. A subsequent tour of the remainder of the first floor revealed no postings at the elevator, staircase, hallways, or on the One North unit. Blue comment cards that assist residents in filing a written grievance, available in central areas on the second and third floor, could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the care plans for nine residents (R), R131, R152, R151, R180, R55, R98, R169, R26 and R76, out of a sample of 36 residents, were appropriately developed and/or implemented to promote the highest practicable physical, mental, and/or psychosocial well-being of these residents. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. Findings includes: 1) During an observation and interview with R131 on 11/15/22 at 10:33 AM noted resident with right lower extremity swelling and redness. R131 was lying in bed with her right lower leg elevated onto the pillow, her eyes were closed. On 11/15/22 at 10:45 AM, state agency (SA) asked the Charge Nurse (CN)6 why her right lower leg is swollen and red. Per CN6, she scratches her leg, and she would rather be up in her chair watching television, which doesn't help with the swelling of her leg. On 11/16/22 at 08:04 AM, an interview with licensed nurse (LN)5 was done. Asked her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that there was an ongoing resident-centered activities program that fully identified and met the residents' needs for four residents, Resident (R)55, R98, R169, and R151, out of a sample of 12 residents, and for over half of the total of 26 residents in a secured dementia unit. Specifically, the facility failed to act on the residents' need for social engagement, failed to identify activities the residents found meaningful, and failed to develop and/or implement a person-centered activities program. Residents on the dementia unit were not engaged in group activities, they were not singing along or exercising and there were residents sitting in the multi-purpose (room for dining and activities) with their eyes closed. As a result of this deficient practice, these residents were placed at risk of experiencing a decline in their psychosocial well-being, self-esteem, and comfort. This deficient practice has the potential to affect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure four residents (R), R55, R169, R26, and R76, in a sample of five residents were free from accident hazards by thoroughly assessing and developing a plan to keep them safe once they had been identified as elopement risks with wandering behavior. As a result of this deficient practice, the residents (R55, R169, R26, R76) were placed at risk of an avoidable accident, interpersonal altercation, and/or injury. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility displaying wandering behavior. Findings include: 1) Cross-reference to F679 Activities Meet Interest/Needs of Each Resident. The facility failed to ensure there was an ongoing resident-centered activities program that fully identified and met the residents' needs, for two residents in the sample, Resident (R)55 and R169. Specifically, the facility failed to act on the residents' need for social engagement and activities despite identifying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, in addition to their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. As a result of this deficient practice, the residents experienced a decreased quality of life and were unable to attain their highest practicable well-being. Findings include: 1) Cross-reference to F679 Activities Meet Interest/Needs of Each Resident. The facility failed to provide staff to adequately monitor and redirect residents identified with wandering behavior. 2) On 11/14/22 at nbh2:39 PM, an interview was done with Resident (R)98 at her bedside. When asked about staffing levels, R98 stated that she feels they could do with more staff. R98 explained that staff seem to be rushing all the time, no matter what shift. R98 gave one example about her shower schedule. R98 stated she showers on her assigned days, Tuesday, and Saturday, and it is done when staff has the time. R98 also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure its nurse staffing information was prominently posted in a clear and visible place accessible to all residents and visitors. Specifically, the facility posted the nurse staffing information at the central nurses' station (fishbowl) on the second floor only, in a place not readily accessible to residents and visitors of the first and third floors. Moreover, the residents of the first floor reside in secured units, making the second floor posting completely inaccessible to them. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents and visitors to the first and third floors. Findings include: 1) On 11/14/22 at 12:45 PM, observations were made on the One South unit that there were no postings found regarding nurse staffing. A subsequent tour of the remainder of the first floor revealed no postings at the elevator, staircase, hallways, or on the One North unit. On 11/16/22 at 09:39 AM, an interview was done at the One South nurses' station (NS) with the Charge Nurse (CN) on duty, CN8. When asked about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all medications and biologicals used in the facility were labeled, stored, and/or disposed of in accordance with professional standards. Proper labeling and storage of medications and biologicals is necessary to promote safe administration practices and decrease the risk for medication errors. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility receiving medications or biologicals. Findings include: 1) On 11/16/22 at 09:14 AM, an inspection of a medication storage room was done with the Charge Nurse (CN) on duty, CN8. While inspecting the treatment cart, two opened and undated medicated gauze 4x4 packets were found with unused gauze remaining. The first one found, CN8 stated he had just used a portion of it to conduct a dressing change, and he should have thrown it [the unused portion] away. In the opened pack used by CN8, observed three tiny squares, approximately 1-centimeter by 1-centimeter in size, of unused gauze remaining in the foil packet. When asked, CN8 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews with staff members, and review of the facility's policy and procedures, the facility did not assure food was stored under sanitary conditions and did not ensure staff members were accurately checking chemical ratio for sanitizing of dishes in the three-compartment sink, the staff member inaccurately identified the parts per million (ppm) of the solution and the new test strips were expired. This deficient practice encourages food-borne illnesses and has the potential to affect all residents, visitors, and staff who receive meals from the kitchen. Findings include: 1) On 11/14/22 at 10:30 AM an initial brief tour of the kitchen was done with the Food Services Director (FSD). Observation of the walk-in refrigerator found an opened bottle of horseradish with a disposal date of 09/30/22, an opened bottle of mustard with no label, six unopened containers of buttermilk with a manufacturer's expiration date to use by 09/09, and there was a clear plastic container of blueberry compote with lid ajar that was labeled 09/28/22. FSD stated the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, support, and honor one Resident's (R) bathing schedule preference. As a result of this deficient practice, R98 did not have her needs met and was placed at risk of not attaining her highest practicable well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: On 11/14/22 at 2:44 PM, an interview was done with Resident (R)98. When asked about whether she is allowed to make choices that are important to her, R98 replied, no. R98 explained that she can only shower twice a week, it's something I just can't get used to, I like to shower every day. R98 stated she showers on her assigned days, Tuesday, and Saturday, and it is done when staff has the time. R98 also stated that she was never asked how often or what days she would like to shower, and when she does have a shower, she is rushed through it, it feels like they're herding cattle, just in and out. On 11/14/22 at 3:00 PM, a review of R98's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission Assessment with an Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review (RR), the facility failed to ensure valid Advance Health Care Directives were obtained and documented in two residents' medical records. As a result of this deficient practice, both Resident (R)98 and R162 were placed at risk of not having their (or their valid representatives') wishes honored for future health care decisions, should they become (or be determined) with diminished or no capacity. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) On 11/15/22 at 12:05 PM, during a review of Resident (R)98's electronic health record (EHR) and hard chart, documentation of a General (financial) Power of Attorney (POA) was found, but none for health care. On 11/16/22 at 2:28 PM, an interview was done with the Director of Social Services (DSS) at the 1 South nurses' station. The DSS confirmed that the facility did not have a Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) for health care on file and she had only just realized that. The DSS stated she was trying to contact R98's POA. On 11/17/22 at 1:20 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, the facility failed to assure comfortable sound levels for residents on a locked/secured dementia unit during dining and activities and for one resident (R)5 on another nursing unit. The residents residing on the secured unit are diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and dementia with/without behavioral disturbances. R5 complained that the roommate's television was too loud. This deficient practice fails to provide a homelike environment and has the potential to affect all residents. Findings include: 1) Observation on 11/14/22 of lunch found residents seated in the multi-purpose room (activity/dining room). Music was being played. The volume was so loud, observed residents weren't talking to one another. The sound of the chairs being pulled out or dragged on the ground was startling loud. Second observation on 11/15/22, observed a resident shouting to another resident over the music. Observations during morning activities on 11/14/22 and 11/15/22 found the volume of the videos being shown on the television was loud. The residents are provided with routine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview with staff member, the facility did not ensure one (Resident 82) of one resident sampled was free from physical restraints. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Resident (R)82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, unspecified; dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance; other seizures; abnormal posture; muscle weakness (generalized); anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition; adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood; and personal history of healed traumatic fracture; and wandering in diseases classified elsewhere. On 11/14/22 at 12:33 PM, observed R82 seated in the multi-purpose room for lunch. R82 was in a wheelchair placed in the corner of the room, the back push handles were up against the wall and the table was placed in the front of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, in a sample of three residents (R), R454, R167, and R111, out of six residents, the facility failed to implement their abuse prohibition policies and procedures to: 1) screen employees for a history of abuse and, 2) to prevent abuse for two residents (R), R167 and R111, involved in a friendship/relationship. The facility's failure to follow their own abuse prohibition policies and procedures could potentially cause irreparable harm to their residents. Findings include: 1) A request of the facility's policy and procedures on abuse/neglect was done during the entrance interview on [DATE]. With regards to screening, the facility provided a Human Resources policy entitled, Background Screening Policy: Associates, with an effective date of [DATE] and revisions on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]. The Purpose section documents the following, This policy provides . supervisors and managers with the necessary guidance and instructions to conduct background…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to appropriately protect two Residents (R), R199 and R454, out of a sample of three residents, from further abuse by failing to report to Adult Protective Services (APS) incidents that involved alleged staff-to-resident abuse. R454's staff-to-resident abuse incident was not reported to the Administration and state agency (SA) within the prescribed timeframes deemed by federal and state regulations. This deficient practice may result in the failure to identify abuse and can potentially affect all residents. Findings include: 1) On 11/14/22 at 07:30 AM, reviewed from the Aspen Complaints/Incidents Tracking System (ACTS) the completed Office of Health Care Assurance (OHCA) Event Report document dated 10/28/22 for ACTS #9859. The document described an alleged staff-to-resident abuse with an ensuing investigation involving Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)80 who assisted R199 roughly when he helped her to the restroom. R199 sustained a bruise on her left hand. A police report was filed, but no report was made to APS. The facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a care plan that addressed the behavioral and emotional health needs of one newly admitted resident (R), R406, out of a sample of three residents. This deficient practice fails to provide non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and emotional health needs of a newly admitted resident and can potentially affect all incoming residents suffering from behavioral and emotional health issues. Finding includes: On 11/15/22 at 1:23 PM, an observation of R406 was done. R406 lay in bed with his eyes closed wearing a hospital gown and tubing into his nostrils that delivered oxygen from an oxygen compressor next to his bed. R406 opened his eyes when the state agency (SA) approached him. SA tried to initiate a conversation with R406, but his eyelids kept drooping closed. R406 spoke with a flat affect and soft tone. Reviewed R406's electronic health record (EHR). The admission Record document revealed that R406 was admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update the care plan with treatment of one Resident (R)131 osteoarthritis of the left wrist. The deficient practice increased the resident's pain and discomfort, and updated interventions improve outcomes of the treatment plan for residents' osteoarthritis. Findings include: On 11/14/2022 at 10:50 AM, surveyor reviewed the completed incident report that was received by the state agency (SA) via fax on 11/03/22 at 4:18 PM. Resident complained of right wrist pain and was noted to have bruising. Resident was taken to acute care for an X-ray. During an observation and interview with R131 on 11/14/22 at 1:30 PM, when asked about her injured wrist, she held up her hand and said, I had a brace for my sore wrist, but it's better now and I don't need it. When asked what happened to cause her sore wrist, she shrugged her shoulders and said she didn't remember. The facility internal investigation report for the unknown injury to the resident's wrist was reviewed on 11/16/22 at 12:38 PM. Report made to Police Department…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff members, the facility did not assure a resident with dementia received appropriate interventons to attain or maintain her highest practicable psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Resident (R)180 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with agitation; depression (06/23/22); psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition (04/26/22); mood disorder due to known physicaological condition with depressive features (04/26/22); anxiety disorder (04/26/22); and restlessness & agitation (04/26/22). Record review notes R180 is prescribed psychotropic medications (used to treat mental health disorders): alpralozam, 1 mg (miligram), give one tablet three times a day for anxiety disorder; risperdal tablet 0.5 mg, give 0.25 mg by mouth one time time a day for dementia with psychosis; citalopram hydrobromide, 20 mg, give 20 mb by mouth one time a day for depressive disorder secondary to dementia; and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately monitor one resident (R)131 for pain management out of a sample of three residents. R131 was prescribed a stronger form of the medication (opioid) versus acetaminophen without indication for its use and for an excessive duration. The deficient practice potentially increases the likelihood for an adverse medication effect. Findings include: Cross reference to F657 Care Plan Timing and Revision. During record review on 11/17/22 at 9:30 AM, noted in the Physician orders, R131 had Norco Tablet (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) 7.5-325 mg (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for pain. Ace Wrap to left wrist, no directions specified for order, 11/03/2022. Resident is at risk for falls related to (r/t) chronic bilateral knee pain, generalized weakness, etc.administer pain medications as ordered, evaluate pain med's effectiveness. Reviewed MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. Section J. Resident assessed for pain. Ask resident:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance in obtaining emergency dental care for pain and bleeding gums for one Resident (R)188 of two residents investigated. The deficient practice potentially increases risk of illness due to the severity of R188's gingivitis (inflamation of the gums) and has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: During an observation and interview with R188's spouse on 11/14/22 at 12:06 PM when asked if she has any concerns about her husband's care since he was admitted to the facility, responded, he has very bad gingivitis, we have been asking them to take him to the dentist. Sometimes when I come in his gums are bleeding. I had to brush his teeth and clean all around his gums. I asked them a few times if he can get a dental appointment, but they never got back to me. Observed an electric toothbrush on top of R188 dresser. Spouse stated, since my husband has been here, I come in to visit him every day to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with staff member, the facility failed to assure a medical record was maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices to ensure accurate documentation. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: Record review found documentation of a power of attorney document in the misc tab for Resident (R)151. The document was very dark, and the name of the resident and the identified power of attorney (POA) was difficult to read. The left side of the pages were darker, making that information illegible. On 11/16/22 interview and concurrent record review was done with the Assistant Director of Social Services (ADSS). The ADSS reviewed the document and stated this was sent to the facility by the POA and acknowledged the clarity of the document was hindered by the dark shading. We were able to decipher the POA's name. ADSS commented that parts of the document cannot be read as it is too dark.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R)131 of five residents in the sample had the pneumococcal vaccine. The deficient practice has the potential to increase the resident's risk for illness and may potentially affect all residents. Finding includes: On 11/17/22 at 2:58 PM electronic health record reviewed for R131. Vaccine information reviewed. R131received the following vaccines: Influenza vaccine 11/04/2022. SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) (Dose 1) 01/6/2021 Complete SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) (Dose 2) 02/3/2021 Complete SARS-COV-2(COVID-19) Moderna Booster 05/18/2022 Complete On 11/17/22 at 3:07 PM, requested the Pneumococcal vaccine information for R131 from the Unit Manager (UM)4, who stated that it is in the hard chart, and she provide the information to the surveyor. At 3:48 PM the Nursing Manager/ Supervisor, informed surveyor there was no documentation that R131 had the Pneumococcal vaccine in her hard chart, and there was no documentation that she had a history of having the pneumococcal vaccine.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0920 — isolatedProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, the facility failed to provide one or more rooms designated for resident dining and activities, ensuring enough space is available and adaptable for a variety of uses and meet resident's needs. Findings include: On 11/14/22 during the lunch meal, observed there were 22 residents in the multi-purpose room seated at six tables. The dining area did not allow spaces to walk through the dining room. There were three residents that required assistance with their meals resulting in 25 people seated at the tables (including staff members). There was one set of chairs that were back-to-back with the spacing too small to walk between. There were three tables placed against the wall resulting in three residents seated alongside the wall. On 11/15/22 observed Resident (R)82 self-propelling up and down the hall in a wheelchair. At 10:25 AM, R82 was assisted by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)33 into the multi-purpose room. R82 started to wheel herself in the room, however, was redirected and removed from the room. CNA stated there is not enough room in there for R82 to wheel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (R) R5 and R6 of three residents who were reviewed for positioning and mobility were provided with restorative services per their plan of care. R5 and R6 did not receive assistance to apply their splints per their plans of care, creating the potential for pain, skin breakdown, or contracture development. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's Restorative Nursing Policy dated 08/07/21 revealed, The facility is responsible for providing maintenance and restorative programs as indicated by the resident's comprehensive assessment to achieve and maintain the highest practicable outcome; and Restorative Nursing can be within one of the following categories: . Splint or brace assistance. Review of R5's undated Resident Face Sheet, located under the Admissions tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adverse reactions were consistently monitored for antipsychotic medication use for one of five residents (Resident (R) 87 reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure created the potential for R87 to experience worsening involuntary muscle movements. Findings include: A review of R87's admission Record, provided on 10/21/21, revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbances, paranoid schizophrenia (a mental illness that has symptoms that blur the line between what is real and what isn't, making it difficult for the person to lead a typical life), and subacute dyskinesia (a condition affecting the nervous system, often caused by long-term use of some psychiatric drugs.) Review of R87's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/16/21 revealed the resident was unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2021-10-26 · tag F0557 — widespreadHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the location of the results of the facility's state inspection results in an area that was readily accessible to residents, families, and the public, without having to ask staff for assistance. Findings include: On 10/20/21 at 10:30 AM during the group meeting with eight alert and oriented Residents (R) (R47, R72, R108, R141, R144, R147. R148, R172) in attendance. When asked if they were aware of the location of the state inspection survey results were located. All eight residents stated no. On 10/22/21 at 8:42 AM, an observation of the second-floor nurses' station revealed the state inspection survey results binder was located behind a glass window. It was visible but was not accessible without staff assistance. In an interview at 8:43 AM, the Staffing Coordinator (SC) obtained the binder from behind the glass window. When asked if the book was easily accessible without staff assistance, she stated it was not. The SC confirmed that this was the only binder available to residents, families, and visitors. In an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,492 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,492 — penalty dated 2026-04-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAK JR LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 06/14/1999 |
| SBK LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 06/14/1999 |
| KELLETT, STILES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 06/14/1999 |
| LEMANUA, LEMAPU | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/20/2021 |
| LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/1994 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $134K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in HI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125040. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-12-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.