Oakwood Specialty Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 47.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene during personal cares for one of two residents observed for toileting hygiene (Res #3). The facility reported a census of 50 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set of Resident #3 dated 8/20/25 coded the resident dependent for toileting hygiene. The MDS reflected the resident always incontinent of urine and bowel. The MDS documented diagnoses that included non Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinson's Disease. The Care Plan of Resident #3 documented the resident to always have urinary incontinence and frequent bowel incontinence, dated 5/5/25. On 9/3/25 at 8:51 am, Resident #3 was in the dining room finishing breakfast. A puddle of urine was noted to be on the floor underneath his wheelchair.On 9/3/25 at 9:06 am, Staff A, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) cued Resident #3 to put his feet up on his wheelchair foot pedals to take him to his room. When she noted the urine, she notified another staff member for it to be cleaned. Observation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Facility Assessment and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an adequate number of staff for the facility's census. The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: The Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for the fiscal year's Quarter 2 (1/1/24 to 3/31/24) revealed the category for an excessively low weekend staffing triggered and the facility had a one-star staffing rating triggered. The Facility Assessment for 2024 provided by the Administrator to the survey team on 9/3/24 had a review date 7/26/24. The assessment revealed the following daily staffing pattern and total number of staff needed per day: Licensed Nurse providing direct care: 6-7 Certified Nursing Assistants ((CNA/ Restorative): 11-13 Certified Medication Aide (CMA): 0-2 The facility had an average daily census of 50.6 residents. The facility assessment revealed staffing based on the resident's acuity and staffing strengths. The assessment also revealed the facility provided a wide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain clean and sanitary conditions in the kitchen, failed to label and store food items and discard leftovers after 3 days in order to maintain food quality and reduce the risk of food-borne illness in the kitchen and the designated resident's refrigerator for one of one nursing units observed. Facility staff also failed to wash hands to prevent food borne illness. The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: 1. Initial kitchen observations on 09/03/24 starting at 9:40 AM revealed the following: a. The microwave had dried yellow debris splattered over the interior glass door and the glass plate inside the microwave, and splatters of food on the top and sides inside the microwave. b. A large frying pan had multiple scratches and the interior surface had peeled and missing Teflon coating. c. The [NAME] Cold Refrigerator had food particles on shelving, and a red liquid spillage on the bottom. The outside of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, menu review, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve the appropriate portions for 4 of 4 residents who received pureed diets (Resident #9, #12, #27, and #31) and 10 of 10 residents on a mechanical soft diet (Resident #4, #7, #18, #19, #25, #28, #30, #35, #37, and #47). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: The facility's Week 3 menu for Tuesday lunch identified barbeque (BBQ) chicken to be served as part of the planned pureed textured diet for the lunch meal served on 09/03/24. The facility's Week 3 menu for Tuesday lunch identified a #8 scoop of BBQ chicken to be served as part of the planned mechanical soft textured diet for the lunch meal served on 09/03/24. The facility's Census Order -All Special Diet Report identified four (4) residents on a pureed texture diet, and ten (10) residents on a mechanical soft textured diet. During observation on 09/03/24 at 12:08 PM, Staff C, Dietary Manager, placed six (6) chicken breasts into a robot coupe container and blended the contents. Staff C took tongs and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to prepare and serve all foods at a safe and palatable temperature in order to prevent foodborne illness for 1 of 1 meals observed. The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: During observation on 09/03/24 at 12:17 PM, four plates of lettuce salad with cut up pieces of ham, turkey, and boiled eggs, and twelve bowls of cottage cheese sat on the counter next to the stove. The plates of salad and the bowls of cottage cheese were not on ice or a cooling mechanism. During observation on 09/03/24 at 12:43 PM, the Activities Director (AD) checked and reported the food temperatures on the following entrees: a. Ground chicken at 162 degrees Fahrenheit (F) b. Pureed rice/broccoli casserole at 184 (F) c. Pureed chicken at 173.5 (F) At 12:53 PM, the AD began to plate food for the residents. At 12:59 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) checked the temperatures on the following entrées: a. Lettuce salad at 54.1 (F) b. Cottage cheese at 49.6 (F) At 1:04 PM, a container of cheese slices sat on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for 1 of 18 residents (Res #26) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment of Resident #26 dated 9/20/23 identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident to have experienced hallucinations during the look back period. The MDS documented the resident exhibited verbal behaviors directed towards others during 4-6 days of the 7-day look back period and exhibited wandering behavior during 1-3 days of the 7-day look back period. The MDS documented diagnoses that included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, seizure disorder, depression and bipolar disorder. The MDS failed to document the resident having a diagnosis of schizophrenia. The Medical Diagnosis section of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of Resident #26 documented schizophrenia became an active diagnosis on 9/8/23 but was not added to the EHR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices to prevent cross contamination of invasive medical equipment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (#12). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: On 9/03/24 at 10:54 AM, Resident #12 was observed with a urinary catheter hung on the left side of the recliner with dependent loop. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 which indicated the resident was not able to complete the interview. It included diagnoses of neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control due to nerve damage), cerebral palsy, bipolar disorder, and need for assistance with personal cares. It also revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter and was dependent in all activities of daily living (ADLs). A Physician's Order included Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to colostomy & suprapubic catheter every…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-29 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview and resident interviews, the facility failed to serve room trays at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests, and plan of care, by delaying room tray delivery for the lunch meal past 1:00 p.m. The facility reported a census of 48. Findings include: In an interview on 5/28/24 at 1:30 p.m. the Director of Nursing stated meal times are scheduled at 8:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m. and 5:45 p.m. During observations on 5/23/24 at 12:15 p.m. staff began serving individual meal plates to residents in the dining room at 12:15 p.m. and completed the serving in the dining room at 12:37 p.m. Room trays observed being prepared at 12:40 p.m. At 12:50 p.m. through 12:52 p.m. room trays delivered to hall 1. Room trays for hall 2 left the kitchen at 1:00 p.m. and the last tray served on hall 2 was at 1:11 p.m. Interviews of residents receiving food trays found some who expressed dissatisfaction with the late serving time. During observations on 5/28/24, staff began serving individual meal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents are provided bathing opportunities for 2 of 3 residents dependent on staff. (Residents #2, #6) The facility reported resident census of 48. Findings include: 1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 9/26/23, Resident #2 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated an intact cognitive status. Resident #2 required limited assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #2's diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus and bipolar disorder. According to Resident #2's Care Plan dated 9/28/23, Resident #2 requires limited physical assistance with bathing. Review of Resident #2's bathing records for September and October 2023, found three occasions in which there was an excess of five days in between bathing opportunities (9/7-9/14/23, 9/15-9/21/23, and 9/25-10/2/23). According to Resident #2's Care Plan dated 9/28/23, the care plan lacked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to answer call lights within a reasonable amount of time. (Residents #2, #6, #7, #8) The facility reported resident census of 48. Findings include: 1. According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 9/26/23, Resident #2 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating an intact cognitive status. Resident #2 required limited assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #2's diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus and bipolar disorder. In an interview on 10/18/23 at 12:00 p.m. Resident #2 stated her only concern with the facility was not having enough staff, noting long call light wait times. 2. According to a MDS with a reference date of 9/26/23, Resident #6 had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 indicating an intact cognitive status. Resident #6 required extensive assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #6's diagnosis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARE INITIATIVES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $294K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA