No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cherokee Specialty Care

1011 North Roosevelt, Cherokee, IA 51012 · Non profit - Corporation · 62 certified beds · (712) 225-5189 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (712) 225-5189 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 20251 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
212 E Bow Dr · (712) 225-6431 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
800 N 2nd St · (712) 225-6121 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
205 W Bluff St · (712) 225-3965 · Call to confirm hours
Park
205 W Bluff St · (515) 269-7899 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.2%17.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%1.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.3%4.2%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%3.8%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.7%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.0%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.7%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table57.9%19.5%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.1%1.4%better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.12U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.4–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.741.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.63
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
41.3%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 37.5 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-22)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, facility photographs, and facility education, the facility failed to secure a hot cup of coffee, monitor a resident known to drink hot coffee all hours of the day and night, test coffee temperatures, follow physicians orders for which resulted in a 2nd degree burn to the groin region that progressively worsened and caused substantial pain for 1 of 3 resident reviewed. (Resident #1) The facility identified the census of 46 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #1 with diagnoses Coronary Artery Disease, Renal Failure, Non-Alzheimer Dementia, anxiety, depression, malnutrition and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) showed the resident scored a 9 which indicated moderate impaired decision making abilities, was able to be understood and has the ability to understand others and has adequate vision. The MDS documented the resident frequently incontinent of urine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations,resident and staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure proper temperatures for foods served to residents. The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Finding Include: 1. Observation on 5/20/25 at 12:17 p.m., of the meal service showed the lunch meal consisted of Salisbury steak, mashed potatoes, carrots, roll and butter and ice cream sandwiches. The test tray was temped after the last resident was served their room lunch tray and temperatures were as follows: a. Salisbury Steak- 133.5 degrees Fahrenheit (F) b. Carrots- 131 degrees F c. Ice cream sandwich was soft and melted d. Roll was noted to have black bottom and hard 2. Observation on 5/20/25 at 12:34 p.m., with items still in the steam table in the kitchen. Food temperatures were as follows: a. Ground Salisbury Steak- 114.9 degrees F b. Carrots 131.9 degrees F Interview on 5/20/25 at 12:36 p.m., with the Dietary Manager confirmed the carrots and ground meat were not at a safe holding temperature and they should have been. 3. Observation on 5/21/25 at 12:09 p.m., of the meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer 1 resident with a negative Level I result for the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), who was later identified with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or other related condition, to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR requirements, (Resident #38). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #38 documented diagnoses of depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, dementia, and other personality and behavioral disorders due to known psychological conditions. The MDS included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #38 revealed the following diagnosis: a. Bipolar Disorder, b. Anxiety, c. Dementia, d. Other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to revise and update care plans to include and address high risk medications and side effects to watch for in the comprehensive care plans for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #24 and #31). The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #24 documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia.The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Order Summary Report dated 4/7/25 revealed the following orders: a. Lantus Subcutaneous Solution (insulin/Diabetic medication) b. Humalog Injection Solution (insulin/Diabetic medication) Review of the Care Plan with an initiated date of 4/11/25 revealed a focus area of I have Diabetes Mellitus. The Care Plan lacked specific side effects to watch for with the usage of diabetic medication. 2. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0572 — isolated
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, admission agreement, resident bill of rights, facility document manager process, resident council meeting minutes, staff and family interview the facility failed to provide the resident/resident representative in writing the resident rights, rules and regulations and responsibility during the stay in the facility or upon admit for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #4). The facility identified a census of 46 residents. Findings include: The Clinical Census report dated [DATE] at 5:18 p.m., documented Resident #4 admitted on [DATE]. The Progress Notes dated [DATE] at 12:18 p.m., documented with Physician Note Text: Resident admits to facility this morning 11:30 a.m., via family vehicle with daughter. Resident is weak when transferring. No complaints. No current illness suspected. Please review orders and advise. On [DATE], the Resident/Power of Attorney (POA) signed and dated the admission Care Plan which indicated acknowledgement of the said form. The POA e-signed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility investigation, resident bill of rights, facility policy/procedures, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a supportive and safe environment for Resident #3. On 8/26/24, the facility staff learned of a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) being accused of backing Resident #3 into a wall and bitching at them. After learning of this allegation of abuse, the facility staff told the CNA not to help Resident #3, but allowed them to work with other residents. The facility identified a census of 46 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #3 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 for which indicated no impaired decision making abilities, no physical or verbal behavior symptoms directed towards others, was able to be understood and ability to understand others and had adequate vision. The MDS also documented the resident as required partial/moderate assistance with showering/bathing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident bill of rights, facility investigation, staff interview and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of a resident and/or residents (Resident #3) were reported to the Department of Inspection and Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) within 2 hour and the facility also failed to report potential abuse for missing Fentanyl (a topical opioid pain medication) patches were reported to the DIAL within 24 hours. (Resident #3 and Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #3 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 for which indicated no impaired decision making abilities, no physical or verbal behavior symptoms directed towards others, was able to be understood and ability to understand others and had adequate vision. The MDS also documented the resident as required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident bill of rights, facility policy/process, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to investigate Resident #3 and Resident #1 missing Fentanyl (a topical opioid pain medications) patches. The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #3 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 for which indicated no impaired decision making abilities, was able to be understood and ability to understand others and has adequate vision. The MDS also documented the resident as required partial/moderate assistance with showering/bathing and independent with other activities of daily living and diagnosis included anemia, coronary artery disease, hypertension, anxiety, depression and chronic pain. The MDS documented the resident had pain frequently over the last 5 days and described the pain as moderate and receiving an opioid medication daily in the last 7 days. The Plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, resident and staff interview the facility failed to provide profession standards according to the plan of care to have the residents colostomy checked every 3 hours for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #2). The facility identified a census of 46 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 11/18/24 documented Resident #2 had diagnosis of anemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, neurogenic bladder, paraplegia, depression and anxiety. The assessment documented the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 for which indicated no impaired decision making abilities, is understood and has the ability to understand others. The assessment documented the resident as dependent with all activities of daily living and has an colostomy. The Plan of Care with an initiated dated 8/14/24, had a focus area of, I use colostomy. Interventions include: *Staff to check colostomy bag every 3 hours and empty as needed. The Point of Care Response History dated 1/27/25 at 4:47 p.m., revealed the task…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, resident council minutes and the facility assessment, the facility staff failed to answer resident call lights in a timely manner (no longer than 15 minutes) for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #2, and #3). The facility identified a census of 46 residents. Findings include: 1. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 11/18/24 documented Resident #2 had diagnosis that included anemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, neurogenic bladder, paraplegia, depression and anxiety. The assessment documented the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 for which indicated no impaired decision making abilities. The assessment documented the resident as dependent with all activities of daily living and was able to be understood and understands others. Interview on 1/27/25 at 3:30 p.m., Resident #2 stated that it will take the staff over a half hour and up to an hour to answer the call light. 2. The MDS assessment form dated 7/4/24, documented Resident #3,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature to 4 of 15 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #5, #35, and #39). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. In an interview on 7/15/24 at 11:37 AM Resident #1 revealed the food is cold when it should be hot. Resident #1 further revealed that room trays are not delivered until everyone in the dining room has been fed. 2. Review of Resident #5's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. In an interview on 7/15/24 at 1:48 PM Resident #5 revealed foods are often cold when they should be hot. 3. Review of Resident #35's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. In an interview on 7/15/24 at 11:56 AM Resident #35 revealed he has been here…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy the facility failed to have the Infection Preventionist at quarterly meetings for their quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: The following Quality Assurance Committee Meeting Sign-In showed the Director of Nursing (DON) as the Infection Preventionist that attended the quarterly meetings for the following dates: a. 12/15/23 b. 3/8/24 c. 5/31/24 The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program policy dated March 2020 identified the Infection Preventionist served on the committee. In an interview on 7/18/24 at 8:40 AM, Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) reported she obtained certification as an infection preventionist. When asked if she attended QAPI meetings, Staff D replied, no. In an interview on 7/18/24 at 8:58 PM, the DON reported she completed the infection preventionist course but failed to realize the infection preventionist certification required succession completion of the infection preventionist certification test.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to immediately notify the physician and resident representative of a fall with an injury for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #32). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #32 scored 13 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses including diabetes and hypoglycemia. The Care Plan identified the resident had an actual fall related to unsteady gait initiated 10/16/2023. The Progress Notes documented the following: a. On 4/11/24 at 10:21 p.m. documented the resident received Hydrocodone (narcotic)-Acetaminophen 5-325 mg for pain in the right leg. b. On 4/12/24 at 10:06 a.m. the resident received Acetaminophen 325 mg for pain in her right ankle. She rated her pain a 6/10. c. On 4/12/24 at 5:16 p.m. the resident received Acetaminophen 325 mg for complaints of pain in her right ankle. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 18 residents reviewed (Resident #38). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #38 scored 12 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had frequent incontinence of bladder, and a urinary toileting program had not been attempted. The resident had diagnoses including a stroke, a seizure disorder, and chronic obsrtuctive pulmonary disease (COPD). The MDS history of the resident's urinary incontinence showed she had been frequently incontinent since 2/13/23, and no urinary toileting program had been attempted while in the facility. The Care Plan revised 6/3/22 identified the resident had occasional bladder incontinence. The interventions included assisting the resident to the bathroom or commode as needed, and assisting with perineal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and timely intervention for a resident with a change of condition for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #32). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #32 scored 13 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses including diabetes and hypoglycemia. The Care Plan identified the resident had an actual fall related to unsteady gait initiated 10/16/2023. The Progress Notes documented the following: a. On 4/11/24 at 10:21 p.m. the resident received Hydrocodone (narcotic)-Acetaminophen 5-325 mg for pain in the right leg. b. On 4/12/24 at 10:06 a.m. the resident received Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tablets for pain in her right ankle. She rated her pain a 6/10. c. On 4/12/24 at 5:16 p.m. the resident received Acetaminophen 325 mg for complaints of pain in her right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to assure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 resident reviewed (Resident #38). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #38 scored 12 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had frequent incontinence of bladder, and a urinary toileting program had not been attempted. The resident had diagnoses including a stroke, a seizure disorder, and chronic obsrtuctive pulmonary disease (COPD). The MDS history of the resident's urinary incontinence showed she was occasionally incontinent of bladder on the admission MDS and she had been consistently, frequently incontinent since 2/13/23, and the MDS history of a toileting program documented no urinary toileting program had been attempted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to prepare, serve and distribute food in accordance with professional standards. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include: During continuous observation on 7/16/24 from 12:15 PM to 12:45 PM Staff B dietary cook was observed wearing no gloves or hand hygiene completed when Staff B opened the freezer and obtained a box of frozen hamburger patties. Staff B then opened the box after cooking with a spatula and used the same hand to obtain a frozen hamburger patty. Staff B was observed to do this three times with no hand hygiene being completed. Staff B then proceeded to touch multiple items (lids for bowls, cabinet handles, spatulas, freezer door handles) in the kitchen with no hand hygiene being completed. In an interview on 7/16/24 at 12:57 PM with Staff C Dietary Service Manager revealed her expectations were for staff to wash hands at appropriate times while in the kitchen. In an interview on 7/16/24 at 1:12 PM with the Administrator revealed that her expectation would be staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to use universal infection control measures and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter) cares and medication administration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident #205). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #205's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further revealed diagnosis of cancer, heart failure, urinary tract infection, and MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). Review of Resident #205's Electronic Health Record (EHR) profile page revealed that Resident #205 was on EBP. In an interview on 7/15/24 at 12:13 PM Resident #205 revealed she is receiving antibiotic treatment via PICC line for treatment of a UTI and that she had (MRSA). Observation on 7/17/24 at 7:43…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions. The facility identified a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. An initial kitchen tour conducted on 5/14/24 at 12:43 p.m., revealed the following observations: Observation of the kitchen fridge revealed the following items ready for service: a. bag of diced chicken open with no open date b. open container of cottage cheese lacked received date with a use by date of 4/20/24 c. open container of cottage cheese lacked received date with a use by date of 5/9/24 d. open package of deli ham with an open date of 5/3/24 with a use by date of 5/4/24 e. open container of tuna salad with an open date of 5/5/24 f. open container of smoked chicken salad with no open date g. open container of potato salad with no open date h. open container of coleslaw with no open date i. styrofoam container lacked a label or open date with a chef salad made inside j. 2- packages of frozen ready to cook soup- thawed and labeled keep frozen until ready…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to complete proper hand hygiene with incontinence care with 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and #4). The facility reported a total census of 54 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 3/19/24 at 3:34 p.m. of Resident #1 being assisted by Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Staff C, CNA to lay down. After Resident #1was laying down Staff C performed hand hygiene and applied gloves, Staff C removed the soiled incontinence brief, performed perineal care. Staff C removed the soiled incontinence brief and with the same soiled gloves took barrier cream and applied to the buttocks area. Staff C removed gloves, performed hand hygiene and applied clean gloves and applied a new incontinence brief. Staff A and Staff C removed gloves when finished and performed hand hygiene. 2. Observation on 3/19/24 at 1:44 p.m., of Resident #4 being assisted by Staff A, CNA and Staff C, CNA to lay down and use the bedpan. After Resident #4 was completed Staff A performed hand hygiene and applied gloves, Staff A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to assure a resident was free from exploitation for 1 of 24 residents reviewed (Resident #29). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #29 scored 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance for transfer, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The resident had diagnoses including non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and acute cystitis (bladder infection). According to the MDS assessment dated [DATE] Resident #29 scored 15 on the BIMS indicating no cognitive impairment. The Care Plan identified the resident had impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought process related to (alcohol induced dementia), with the goal to be able to communicate basic needs on a daily basis. The interventions included: a. Communicating with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Surveyor: [NAME]-[NAME], Lea Based on personnel file review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain the Department of Human Services (DHS) approval to work for staff with a criminal record for 1 of 5 staff reviewed (Staff L). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: A Staff List documented Staff L Activity Director hired on 1/26/22. A Single Contact License and Background Check (SING) completed 1/27/22 showed Staff L had a criminal record. Staff L's personnel record lacked DHS approval to work. On 11/9/23 at 9:50 a.m. the Administrator stated they could not find anything on a DHS evaluation for Staff L. She said they were told by corporate she was cleared (to work). The facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy revised April 2021 documented the facility would conduct employee background checks and not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who had been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notice was signed by residents and or the resident's responsible person and had the daily rate filled in when residents transferred out of the facility for 4 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #7, #16, and #52). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnoses of anemia, heart failure and seizure disorder. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1 ' s Nrogress notes revealed the following information: On 11/3/23 at 2:20 a.m., sent the resident to the emergency room at 7:07 p.m On 11/3/23 at 1:26 p.m., resident returns to facility from local hospital. Review of the residents #1 ' s Census tab revealed the following information: 11/2/23 hospital unpaid leave 11/3/23 active Review of the clinical record revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions. The facility identified a census of 49 residents. Findings include: An initial kitchen tour conduct on 11/06/23 at 11:09 a.m., revealed the following observations: a. 1 cup of thickened juice uncovered and no label in refrigerator ready for service. b. 1 cup of thickened milk uncovered and no label in refrigerator ready for service. c. Open container of thickened water with no open date in the refrigerator ready for service. Container reads only good for 7 days after opening. d. Open container of thickened juice with no open date in the refrigerator ready for service. Container reads only good for 10 days after opening. e. Refrigerator noted to have a red liquid pooled in the bottom of the refrigerator f. 2 cups of ice cream with topping uncovered and no label in the freezer. g. Milk cooler ice buildup on left side, right side and back of cooler. h. Peanut butter container lid was on but there was peanut butter under and around…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to perform proper hand hygiene during routine cares for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #16) and failed to pass personal linens in a sanitary manner through the facility. The facility reported a total census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. The The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #16 documented diagnoses hypertension, diabetes mellitus and paraplegia. The MDS included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Observation on 11/07/23 at 2:32 p.m., with Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN), MDS Nurse perform wound care for Resident #16. Staff C laid a barrier under Resident #16 ' s legs and laid ankles on top of the barrier. Noted Staff C to have 5 small round stickers stuck to her right inner arm. Staff C took a pair of dressing scissors off of the bedside table and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to assure each resident received care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life for 2 of 15 sampled residents (Resident #29 and #38). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #29 scored 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance for transfer, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The resident had diagnoses including non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and acute cystitis (bladder infection). The Care Plan dated 6/21/23 identified the resident at risk for falls. The interventions included encouraging her to use her call light for assistance. The Care Plan identified the resident unable to transfer independently. The interventions included the resident required 1-2 person assistance with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman for 1 of 4 residents reviewed who transferred to the hospital (Resident #52). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Resident #52 ' s clinical records revealed diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, atrial flutter and fibrillation and acute kidney failure. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment revealed a score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #52 ' s Progress Notes revealed the following information: On 9/24/23 at 3:42 p.m., send to emergency room to be assessed. On 9/25/23 at 7:31 a.m., admitted to local hospital. Review of Resident #52 ' s Census tab revealed the following: 9/18/23 active 9/24/23 hospital paid leave 10/5/23 discharge paid 10/6/23 stop billing Review of MDS listing revealed the following: 9/18/23 entry 9/24/23 discharge return not anticipated Review of the facility document titled Notice of Transfer Form to Long Term Care Ombudsman dated August, September, and October lacked Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record and chart review the facility failed to accurately document a resident's specific need for 1 of 15 residents reviewed (Resident #24). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #24 documented diagnosis of depression, and respiratory failure. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed the facility failed to code insulin injections for 7 out of 7 days in the lookback period. Review of the August Medication Administration Record (MAR), indicated that Resident #24 administered insulin daily in the 7 day lookback period. Interview on 11/8/23 at 1:24 PM, with the MDS Coordinator agreed that it was coded inaccuratley. She voiced that she coded the 7 day insulin in section N300 on the MDS under the Injections of any type. She voiced that she should have coded it under N350 Insulin Injections also. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to resubmit Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) after a 180 day short stay approval expired on [DATE] for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #7) and failed to refer 1 resident with a negative Level I result for the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), who was later identified with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or other related condition, to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination for 1 out of 1 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for PASRR requirements. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented diagnoses of depression, anxiety disorder, psychotic disorder, auditory hallucinations and visual hallucinations. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to revise and update care plans to include and address high risk medications and side effects to watch for and update care plan after high risk medication was discontinued in 1 out of 5 sampled residents (Resident #7) and update care plans with interventions to prevent further falls in 1 out of 15 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (Resident #48). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented diagnoses of depression, anxiety disorder, psychotic disorder, auditory hallucinations and visual hallucinations. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the October 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following orders: Hydrocodone-acetaminophen (opioid medication) with a start date of 8/29/23 and discontinue date of 10/31/23. Oxycodone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and observation the facility failed to provide professional standards of care by administering medications for 2 of 12 residents reviewed (Resident # 11 and Resident # 36). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident # 11 documented diagnosis of hypertension, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Observation on 11/7/23 at 11:38 AM observed Staff A administer the Albuterol solution into the nebulizer device, Resident #11 stated that he would do the nebulizer after lunch, Staff A replied okay and left the room and the Albuterol solution in the nebulizer. 2. The MDS assessment dated for 8/10/23 for Resident #36 documented diagnosis of malnutrition, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The BIMS dated 11/2/23 shows a score of 13, indicating no cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement measures as instructed in the Care Plan to ensure the bed remained in the lowest position on the floor to prevent falls for 1 out of 13 residents reviewed (Resident #48). The facility reported a census of 50. Findings included: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #48 documented diagnoses of stroke, traumatic brain injury and psychotic disorder. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The facility Incident Reports indicated Resident #48 fell in her room on the following dates: a. 9/14/23 b. 9/19/23 c. 9/21/23 d. 10/15/23 e. 10/16/23 f. 10/24/23 The Incident Report dated 10/16/23 showed Resident #48 suffered a skin tear to the right shoulder as a result of a fall that occurred that day. The Care Plan History dated 10/16/23 showed staff instructed to place the bed to the floor while the resident is in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate clinical record 1 for out of 13 residents reviewed (Resident #48). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings Included: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #48 documented diagnoses of stroke, traumatic brain injury and psychotic disorder. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The facility Incident Reports indicated Resident #48 fell in her room on the following dates: a. 9/14/23 b. 9/19/23 c. 9/21/23 d. 10/15/23 e. 10/16/23 f. 10/24/23 The Progress Notes for Resident #48 showed the facility failed to document the following falls: a. 9/19/23 b. 9/21/23 c. 10/24/23 The Falls - Clinical Protocol policy dated March 2018 identified: Assessment and Recognition 1. The physician will help identify individuals with a history of falls and risk factors for falling. a. Staff will ask the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARE INITIATIVES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avoca Specialty CareAvoca, IA 1 of 5Correctionville Specialty CareCorrectionville, IA 1 of 5Crestview Specialty CareWest Branch, IA 1 of 5Heritage Specialty CareCedar Rapids, IA 1 of 5Kingsley Specialty CareKingsley, IA 1 of 5Parkridge Specialty CarePleasant Hill, IA 1 of 5Ravenwood Specialty CareWaterloo, IA 1 of 5Westwood Specialty CareSioux City, IA 2 of 5Chariton Specialty CareChariton, IA 2 of 5Creston Specialty CareCreston, IA 2 of 5Dubuque Specialty CareDubuque, IA 2 of 5Lantern Park Specialty CareCoralville, IA 2 of 5New London Specialty CareNew London, IA 2 of 5Northcrest Specialty CareWaterloo, IA 2 of 5Northern Mahaska Specialty CareOskaloosa, IA 2 of 5Pinnacle Specialty CareCedar Falls, IA 2 of 5Southridge Specialty CareMarshalltown, IA 2 of 5Stratford Specialty CareStratford, IA 3 of 5Atlantic Specialty CareAtlantic, IA 3 of 5Centerville Specialty CareCenterville, IA 3 of 5Eldora Specialty CareEldora, IA 3 of 5Manly Specialty CareManly, IA 3 of 5Montezuma Specialty CareMontezuma, IA 3 of 5Odebolt Specialty CareOdebolt, IA 3 of 5Panora Specialty CarePanora, IA 3 of 5Ridgewood Specialty CareOttumwa, IA 3 of 5Southern Hills Specialty CareOsceola, IA 3 of 5West Ridge Specialty CareKnoxville, IA 4 of 5Bedford Specialty CareBedford, IA 4 of 5Belle Plaine Specialty CareBelle Plaine, IA 4 of 5Corning Specialty CareCorning, IA 4 of 5Corydon Specialty CareCorydon, IA 4 of 5Dunlap Specialty CareDunlap, IA 4 of 5Laporte City Specialty CareLa Porte City, IA 4 of 5Lyon Specialty CareRock Rapids, IA 4 of 5Oakwood Specialty CareAlbia, IA 5 of 5Fonda Specialty CareFonda, IA 5 of 5Lamoni Specialty CareLamoni, IA 5 of 5Mechanicsville Specialty CareMechanicsville, IA 5 of 5Sibley Specialty CareSibley, IA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CARE INITIATIVESOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/12/2010
COMPUTERSHARE CORPORATE TRUST COMPANY, NAOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
BEAL, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2020
BOWEN, LANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
CAROTHERS, MARY JANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
CHILDS, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
CORLESS, PETERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
KREIN, KEITHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/29/2022
RUST, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
STURM, DENISEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
UPMEYER, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/29/2022
DIXON, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2016
DRAKE, EMILYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/04/2023
GILYARD, TANYAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/23/2025
KUHN, JERAMYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/25/2008
MCDYER, JESSICAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/22/2023
BOEVE, DESTINYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
JURGENS, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
SCHUBERT, KRISTIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2009

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$468K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 5%Other / private 27%

This home reported $468K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$233per resident / day
operating cost
$7,088per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$271per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165330. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next