Kingsley Specialty Care
305 West Third, Kingsley, IA 51028 · Non profit - Corporation · 43 certified beds · (712) 378-2400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,378 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-21)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.5% | 17.1% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.2% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.9% | 4.2% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.8% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.7% | 16.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 38.5% | 20.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.8% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.8% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.8% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 41.8% | 19.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.9% | 2.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.6% | 73.3% | 79.4% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.2%CMS range 36.0–62.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.5–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 34.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 3.9–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 32.9 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-21 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), to a resident requiring CPR prior to the arrival of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel for 1 resident (Resident #1). Resident #1 had requested CPR and was not breathing and had no pulse. Staff performed some compressions, but failed to perform airway resuscitation, and failed to continue the compressions until EMS took over. The facility had a crash cart and back board to perform CPR, but staff failed to utilize the available resources. EMS started CPR when they arrived and transported the resident to the hospital. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the resident. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of [DATE] on [DATE] at 2:35 PM. The facility staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] through the following actions: staff education on CPR policy and need to continue CPR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to notify physician of blood sugars not within parameters and when medication not given as ordered for 1 of 4 residents reviewed, (Resident#1). The facility reported a census of 37 residents. Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #1 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Care Plan dated 4/16/26 identified Resident #1 used insulin/hypoglycemic medications related to diabetes. The interventions included administering insulin medications as ordered by the physician and monitor blood glucose as ordered. a. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2026 included Insulin Lispro 10 units 3 times a day with a start date of 3/24/26, hold if insulin less than 100. The MAR lacked a blood sugar readings or insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report misappropriation of medication for 1 resident (Resident #6) to the Department of Inspections, Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) (the state survey and licensing agency). The facility reported a census of 37 residents. Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], Resident #6 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory failure.The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for December 2025 showed Resident #6 had the order for Ondansetron disintegrating oral tablet every 8 hours as needed (PRN) for nausea.On 5/19/26 at 9:41 p.m. Staff D Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated she started mid-December last year and was training with Staff E LPN. Staff D said at 1 point Staff E took a Zofran pill out, and took it herself. Staff D was shocked Staff E…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for medication administration and blood sugars falling outside the identified parameters for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 37 residents.Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #1 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Care Plan dated 4/16/26 identified Resident #1 used insulin/hypoglycemic medications related to diabetes. The interventions included administering insulin medications as ordered by the physician and monitoring blood glucose as ordered. a. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2026 included Insulin Lispro 10 units 3 times a day with a start date of 3/24/26, hold if blood sugar less than 100.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident on dialysis had needed equipment to facilitate treatment for 1 resident (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 37 residents.Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #1 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The resident received dialysis.The Care Plan dated 4/16/26 identified Resident #6 used insulin/hypoglycemic medications related to diabetes. Interventions included administering insulin medications as ordered by the physician, monitoring blood glucose as ordered, and monitoring for side effects (low blood sugar, headache, weakness, sweating and fainting) and effectiveness. The Care Plan identified the resident received hemodialysis on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Fridays each week…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate account of controlled medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 37 residents. Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #3 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included heart failure, pneumonia, diabetes, and pain in right and left knees.The Care Plan dated 1/7/25 identified Resident #3 had pain related to his diagnosis. Interventions included monitoring and documenting side effects of pain medication. The resident used opioid medications. Interventions included administering opioid medication per physician order and monitoring for side effects.A facility report documented on 4/8/26 during the administration of Resident #3's scheduled morning dose of Oxycodone/APAP (narcotic/acetaminophen (Tylenol), the administering nurse identified a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete record of 1 resident missing dialysis for 1 resident reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 37 residents.Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #1 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The resident received dialysis.The Care Plan dated 4/20/26 identified Resident #1 received hemodialysis on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Fridays each week at the dialysis center. Interventions included encouraging to go for the scheduled dialysis appointments.The Progress Notes dated 5/9/26 documented Resident #1 sent by ambulance to the hospital.On 5/19/26 at 11:49 a.m. Resident #1's family member stated they were concerned about her care at the facility. The family member said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report from Fiscal Quarter 2, 2025 (January 1 through March 31) review, facility staffing review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to meet staffing requirements in all three metrics. The facility reported a census of 31 residents.Findings include:The PBJ Staffing Data Report with a run date of 7/29/25 triggered submitted weekend staffing data excessively low within the quarter.Review of staffing for Nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) scheduled similarly for weekdays and weekends. In an interview on 8/7/25 at 3:34 PM, the Administrator reported recently being hired and not aware of how incorrect data was reported to CMS. The Administrator reported she expected data to be reported correctly and would look into the matter. The Reporting Direct-Care Staffing Information (Payroll-Based Journal) policy last revised October 2017 identified staffing and census information will be reported electronically to CMS through the Payroll-Based Journal system in compliance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature to 4 of 20 residents reviewed (Resident #3, #5, #8 and #25). The facility reported a census of 31 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #3 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 8/4/25 at 1:03 PM Resident #3 stated the food is delivered cold to her room every day. Resident #3 stated all meals not a particular time. Resident #3 stated the meal came cold at lunch today. 2. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #5 documented a BIMS of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 8/5/25 at 9:33 AM Resident #5 stated he told the Administrator that the food was cold and then the evening meal started to get hotter but lunch is almost always cold. 3. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #25 documented a BIMS of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 8/5/25 at 7:55 AM Resident #25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Records (EHR) review, observation, document review, and staff interviews the facility failed to prepare food in a form designed to meet individual needs by sending incorrect consistency for modified diet ordered for 6 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #7, #9, #10, #11, #13 and #22). The facility reported a census of 31 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, unsteadiness on feet and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident #7's EHR titled, Orders documented an order for regular / no added salt diet with mechanical soft texture.Review or Resident #7's lunch meal ticket from 8/6/25 documented a mechanical soft diet with 1/2 cup of chopped brussels sprouts.2. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #9 documented a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards by not dating open food items and not disposing of expired food items. The facility reported a census of 31 residents.Findings include:The initial kitchen observation on 8/4/25 at 10:50 AM revealed the refrigerator in the dish machine room had broccoli dated 7/25/25. The 3 door refrigerator had an open and undated bag of shredded cheese. The Dry storage had an open and undated 5lbs bag of egg noodles and an open undated 5lbs bag of tri color spiral noodles. The 2 door freezer had an open and undated bag of hush puppies. The [NAME] freezer chest had an open and undated bag of frozen chicken breasts. The 2 door stand up freezer had an open undated bag of pork chops and a bag of pork sausages that were dated but were not covered.On 8/4/25 at 11:00 AM Staff H, Dietary Manager stated all open food items should have the date the item was opened. Staff H stated the broccoli dated 7/25/25 should have been thrown away. Staff H explained her expectation was that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, policy review, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to provide dignity and respect to 1 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 31 residents.Finding include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, unsteadiness on feet and generalized muscle weakness. The MDS indicated Resident #7 required substantial / maximal assistance for transfers on and off the toilet and Resident #7 was completely dependent on staff for toileting hygiene.An observation on 8/4/25 at 1:15 PM revealed Staff A, Non Certified Aide (NA) entered Resident #7's room and shut the call light off. Resident #7 stated to Staff A he needed to go to the bathroom. Staff A told Resident #7 she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility after hospitalization for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #39). The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #39 documented a discharge assessment with return anticipated for an unplanned short-term general hospital stay.The Clinical Progress Notes for Resident #39 showed on 3/10/25 at 9:01 PM showed the resident admitted to the hospital. The notes showed no documentation for readmission.In an interview on 8/4/25 at 1:32 PM, the locally assigned Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (OSLTCO) reported on March 7, 2025 the facility's Business Office Manager (BOM) called to discuss Resident #39's Medicare coverage ended and that he owed a substantial outstanding balance. The BOM reported Resident #32 wanted to remain at the facility until he had the strength to go home, but refused to pay. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Medication Administration Record (MAR) - Treatment Administration record (TAR), Electronic Health Records (EHR) review, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to represent an accurate assessment of the resident's status during the observation period of the MDS by not accurately assessing the use of insulin for 1 of 10 residents reviewed (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Finding include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 8/4/25 at 1:21 PM Resident #7 stated he was not on insulin. Review of Resident #7's MDS dated [DATE] documented 7 days insulin injections were received during the last 7 days and no order for insulin.Review of Resident #7's EHR titled, Orders documented no current order for insulin.Review of Resident #7's EHR titled, Orders documented basaglar kwik pen started 2/3/23 and discontinued 3/22/24 and insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, staff interview, policy, and Medication Administration Records - Treatment Administration Records (MAR-TAR) review the facility failed to provide needed services in accordance with professional standards by administering a medication that should have been held related to parameters for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #8, dated 7/7/25 did not document a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Review of EHR titled, Progress Notes dated 8/5/25 revealed a BIMS evaluation with a BIMS of 15 documented. The MDS documented diagnoses of essential hypertension and unspecified hypotension. An observation on 8/6/25 at 7:24 AM with Staff D, MDS Coordinator / Infection Preventionist (IP) / Registered Nurse (RN) present of Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN) prepare medications for Resident #8, blood pressure obtained 140/70, midodrine 10mg removed from the drawer, midodrine reviewed with the MAR, midodrine 10mg removed from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide 2 of 37 medications as ordered resulting in a medication error rate of 5.41. The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #8, dated 7/7/25 did not document a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Review of EHR titled, Progress Notes dated 8/5/25 revealed a BIMS evaluation with a BIMS of 15 documented. The MDS documented diagnoses of essential hypertension and unspecified hypotension. An observation on 8/6/25 at 7:24 AM with Staff D, MDS Coordinator / Infection Preventionist (IP) / Registered Nurse (RN) present of Staff E, Registered nurse (RN) prepare medications for Resident #8, blood pressure obtained 140/70, midodrine 10mg removed from the drawer, midodrine reviewed with the MAR, midodrine 10mg removed from the bubble pack, the rest of Resident #8's medications removed from bubble pack, Staff E knocked on Resident #8's door, Staff E…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to provide proper hand hygiene after resident care for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #8 and #26). The facility reported a census of 31 residents.Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/06/2025 at 8:02 AM showed Staff K, Certified Nursing Assistant, (CNA) and Staff C, CNA performed hand hygiene, donned personal protective equipment (PPE) of a gown and gloves then provided care for a catheter and bowel movement incontinence. When finished Staff K removed the soiled gown and gloves, used the left hand to hold the trash receptacle, then used the right hand to place soiled PPE into the trash. Staff K next placed her right hand on top of the soiled PPE, and pushed the soiled PPE down further into the trash receptacle. Without performing hand hygiene Staff K arranged the resident’s sheet and bedside table. In an interview on 8/7/25 at 3:34 PM, the Administrator reported she expected staff to complete hand hygiene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to revise and update care plans to include appropriate interventions for residents to prevent repeated fall and injuries for 3 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1, #2 and #3). The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #2 documented diagnoses of neurological disorder, dysphagia, and stroke. The MDS showed Resident #2 ' s cognitive skills for daily decision making as moderately impaired. Review of the facility Incident Reports from a look back period starting on admission [DATE] through 12/31/24 showed Resident #2 fell four times. The Incidents Reports for Resident #2 showed the following falls: a. On 11/8/24 at 11:00 PM- resident found with his back on the floor. b. On 11/9/24 at 4:53 PM- resident found sitting on the floor. c. On 11/25/24 at 10:47 PM- resident found on the floor sitting on both knees. d. On 12/7/24 at 9:47 AM-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interviews, and facility record review, the facility failed to provide adequate fall interventions and communicate inventions via the care plan to prevent falls that resulted in injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #1). The facility reported a total census of 34 residents. Findings included: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented the initial reentry to the facility from a short term general hospital stay. The Clinical assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. On 10/14/24 reassessment of the BIMS showed a score of 1 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Medical Diagnosis for Resident #1 showed diagnoses of dementia, blindness, cerebral infarction, and heart failure. The Fall Risk Evaluation dated 10/8/24 for Resident #1 showed the fall risk score of 13, which indicated a high risk of falling.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report from Fiscal Quarter 3, 2024 (April 1- June 30) review, facility staffing review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to meet staffing requirements in three metrics. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: The PBJ Staffing Data Report with a run date of 9/4/24 triggered no data submitted for the quarter, excessively low weekend staffing, and failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours a day for four or more days within the quarter and less than 24 hours per day licensed nursing coverage. Review of staffing for nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) scheduled similarly for weekdays and weekends. The Reporting Direct-Care Staffing Information (Payroll-Based Journal) policy directed staff to electronically report staff and census information to CMS in compliance with 6106 of the Affordable Care Act. In an interview on 9/13/24 at 3:23 PM, the Administrator reported knowledge of the requirement of submitting staffing data to CMS. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, infection control policy and staff interview, the facility failed to initiate a legionella water program for the facility. The facility reported a total census of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. Interview on 9/12/24 at 10:24 a.m., with Staff A, Maintenance Director revealed Staff B, Administrator was in charge of the Legionella water program. He did not do any testing or monitoring of the program. Interview on 9/12/24 at 10:26 a.m., with Staff C, Registered Nurse, Infection Preventionist revealed she did not know who was in charge of the Legionella water program for the facility. Interview on 9/12/24 at 10:38 a.m., with Staff B, Administrator revealed Staff B and Staff A were in charge of the Legionella water program for the facility. Staff B could not give specifics on when the testing was done but the facility planned to educate the facility staff on the program this month. Staff B revealed the facility had a 20 page plan and would have to review the plan in order to be able to explain the plan. Staff B was unable to explain what the facility was currently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notice was signed by residents and or the resident's responsible person when residents transferred out of the facility for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #7, #18, #32 and #36). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented diagnoses of cancer, hypertension, anxiety and depression. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #7's Census tab revealed the following information: a. 8/29/24- hospital unpaid leave b. 9/1/24- active c. 5/8/24- hospital unpaid leave d. 5/9/24- active Review of bed hold dated 8/23/23 revealed son had been contacted via phone for bed hold authorization but was not sent to representative for signature. Review of bed hold dated 5/9/24 revealed verbal confirmation but lacked a contact and lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions. The facility identified a census of residents. Findings include: An initial kitchen tour conducted on 9/9/24 at 10:17 a.m., revealed the following observations: The dry storage area revealed the following items ready for service: a. A bottle of kiwi-lime sauce with an expiration date of 8/15/24. b. A bottle of mango sauce with an expiration date of 6/8/24. c. Two packages of tortilla shells with an expiration date of 9/6/24. d. Twenty one packages of tortilla shells with an expiration date of 8/4/24. The kitchen fridge revealed the following items ready for service: a. Two gallons of white milk open with no open date. b. One gallon of chocolate milk open with no open date. c. Thickened water, open, with no open date. d. Thickened apple juice, open, with no open date. e. A gallon of orange juice unlabeled, with no open date. A container of food thickener open with no open date and scoop inside of the container with lid on. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain a clean, orderly and homelike environment for the residents and public by having boxes stacked around the nurses station and having 2 wheelchairs parked in the hallway blocking an emergency door. The facility identified a census of 33. Findings include: 1. Observation on 9/9/24 at 11:40 a.m., of 16 boxes stacked along the wall by the nurses station. 2. Observation on 9/9/24 at 11:50 a.m., of two wheelchairs sitting at the end of the 300 hallway next to each other blocking the exit door. 3. Observation on 9/9/24 at 12:13 p.m., of 16 boxes still stacked along the wall by the nurses station. 4. Observation on 9/9/24 at 1:57 p.m., of 14 boxes still stacked along the wall around nurses station and 2 wheel chairs sitting at the end of the 300 hallway next to each other blocking the exit door. 5. Observation on 9/12/24 at 12:16 p.m., of 26 boxes stacked along the wall sitting around the nurses station and 4 boxes stacked next to the nurses station. Review of facility provided policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interviews, and staff interviews the facility failed to respect each resident's dignity throughout all care and services provided (Resident #32). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #32 documented diagnosis of renal insufficiency, Diabetes Melltuis and peripheral vascular disease. The MDS showed a BIMs score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. The Care Plan for Resident #32 showed the presence of a urinary catheter. The interventions included changing the catheter as needed. In an interview on 9/10/24 at 9:58 AM, Resident #32 reported an incident that occurred in July that he reported a catheter leak to a nurse. The resident stated, the nurse was more worried about leaving in time for her shift to be over than taking care of my catheter. No one did anything. I sat the whole night with a leaking catheter. I was soaked and smelled of urine. I was upset and embarrassed. I filed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of hospitalization of 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 33. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented diagnoses of cancer, hypertension, anxiety and depression. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #7's Census tab revealed the following information: a. 8/29/24- hospital unpaid leave. b. 9/1/24- active. Review of bed hold dated 8/23/23 revealed son had been contacted for bed hold authorization. Review of Progress Notes lacked documentation son had been contacted and signed bed hold authorization. During interview on 9/11/24 at 10:11 a.m., Resident #7's son was asked to confirm confirmation of authorizing a bed hold for Resident #7's hospitalization. Resident #7's son revealed he had never…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop care plans to address usage of high risk medications and side effects to watch for 2 out of 5 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (Resident #4 and #35). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented diagnoses of hypertension, depression, bipolar disorder and diabetes mellitus. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #4's September Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed current orders for the following medications: a. Latuda tablet daily (antipsychotic medication) with a start date of 8/21/23. b. Nucynta Tablet four times daily (opioid medication) with a start date of 9/13/23. Review of Resident #4's current medication orders revealed orders for the following medications: a. Latuda daily with a start date of 8/21/23. b.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide professional standards of care by not initiating physical therapy as ordered for 1 of 12 residents reviewed (Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #9 documented diagnoses of cancer, renal insufficiency, and Parkinson's Disease. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating no cognitive impairment. In an interview on 9/9/24 at 11:59 AM, Resident #9 reported the physician ordered physical therapy for shoulder pain, but therapy wasn't initiated. Review of the electronic Physician Orders showed the facility lacked an order for physical therapy. Review of the written Physician Orders showed physical therapy ordered on 7/18/24 related to shoulder pain. Review of Resident #9's chart on 9/10/24 at 8:46 AM revealed no further documentation found relating to physical therapy. In an interview on 9/10/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to provide bathing assistance twice weekly for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for bathing (Resident #4, #23 and #35). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented diagnoses of hypertension, depression, bipolar disorder and diabetes mellitus. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Interview on 9/9/24 at 2:05 p.m., with Resident #4 revealed showers are kind of sporadic here. Sometimes we get them when we are supposed to and other times we do not as they tell us they are short staffed. We are not getting them like we are supposed to. Review of Resident #4's Task List revealed bathing as needed and scheduled for Monday and Thursdays. Review of Resident #4's Care Plan lacked frequency of bathing. Review of facility provided documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy the facility failed to complete assessment and interventions for the necessary care and services. Clinical record review revealed the nursing staff failed to complete all required skilled assessments for 1 out 12 residents reviewed (Resident #37). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings included: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #37 documented diagnosis of renal insufficiency, Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and coronary artery disease. The MDS showed a BIMs score of 14, indicating no cognitive impairment. The Progress Note with the effective date of 8/1/24 showed Resident #37's primary care provider documented the resident returned from the hospital on skilled level of care after a prolonged hospital stay for sepsis, hypoxia, rhabdomyolysis, DM, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and myocardial infarction. The Skilled Evaluations for Resident #37 showed the facility failed to complete skilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a restorative program to a resident with mobility concerns for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented diagnoses of hypertension, depression, bipolar disorder and diabetes mellitus. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Interview on 9/9/24 at 2:06 p.m., with Resident #4 revealed she was not receiving restorative therapy anymore. Resident #4 explained there is not a staff member to do it anymore. Resident #4 further revealed that was the only exercise my legs got. She explained that since the facility has stopped doing restorative therapy she feels like there is a difference in her legs. Review of Physical Therapy Discharge summary dated and signed 9/1/23 revealed discharge recommendations included: a. Restorative range of motion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy the facility failed to complete assessment and interventions for the necessary care and services related to dialysis. Clinical record review revealed the nursing staff failed to complete all required dialysis evaluations for 1 out 2 residents reviewed (Resident #37). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings included: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #37 documented diagnosis of renal insufficiency, Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and coronary artery disease. The MDS showed a BIMs score of 14, indicating no cognitive impairment. The Physician Order dated 8/14/24 instructed staff to complete dialysis evaluations prior to dialysis and post dialysis on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. One dialysis evaluation on Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday and Sunday. The Dialysis Evaluations for Resident #37 showed the facility failed to complete evaluations on: a. 8/2/24 b. 8/4/24 c. 8/5/24 d. 8/16/24 e. 8/23/24 f. 8/27/24 g. 8/28/24 h.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service by not having a qualified professional serve as the dietary manager. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: Interview on 6/26/23 at 10:15 AM with the facility Dietary Manager revealed she does not have education and training completed to be a qualified professional to serve as the Dietary Manager at the facility. Interview on 6/26/23 at 10:15 AM with Staff B revealed she did not have her certification for dietary manager. She further revealed that she is currently taking the classes to become certified. Interview 6/28/23 at 2:15 PM Administrator revealed her expectation is for the dietary manager to have a Dietary Manager Certification. Review of the facility ' s policy titled, Dietician, last revised October 2017 instructed the following: 7. If a dietitian is not employed full time (35 or more hours per week) a director of food service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: Observation on 6/23/23 at 10:15 AM revealed a single door white freezer had an outside thermometer reading 7 degrees. Upon opening the freezer the inside thermometer read 20 degrees. Food inside of the freezer was cool to the touch, defrosted, and mushy. Foods observed included premade egg omelets, sausage links, hamburger patties, sliced ham, ice cream, pies, and hashbrowns. Review of the facility ' s policy titled, Refrigerators and Freezers, last revised December 2014 documented: Acceptable temperature ranges are 35 degrees fahrenheit to 40 degrees fahrenheit for refrigerators and less than 0 degrees fahrenheit for freezers. In an interview on 6/23/23 at 10:30 AM Staff B revealed everything would be getting thrown away from the freezer and her expectation was for frozen foods to be frozen. During a follow up observation on 6/23/23 at 3:30 PM the single door white freezer was empty.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to properly complete the Centers of Medicare & Medicaid form #10055 for 2 of 3 sampled residents, (Residents #34 and #38). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings Include: 1. The ABN form #10055 dated 2/27/23 for Resident #34 revealed the form lacked the reason Medicare may not pay and the estimated cost of services. 2. The ABN form #10055 dated 3/4/23 for Resident #38 revealed the form lacked the estimated cost of skilled nursing care. The Medicare Advanced Beneficiary Notice policy Dated April 2021 identified if the admissions coordinator or business office manager believes (upon admission or during the resident ' s stay) that Medicare (Part A of the Fee-for-Service Medicare Program) will not pay for an otherwise covered skilled service(s), the resident (or representative) is notified in writing why the service(s) may not be covered and of the resident ' s potential liability for payment of the non-covered service(s). The facility issues the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (CMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to correctly code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) by not accurately recording resident assessments for 2 of 15 residents reviewed, (Resident #2 and #42). The facility reported a census of 40. Findings include: 1. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #2 documented the Resident had an enteral tube (feeding tube). Record review of a document titled Clinical Physician Orders, Resident #2 physician orders revealed he has never had a feeding tube. 2. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #42 documented the Resident had an indwelling catheter. Record review of a document titled Clinical Physician Orders, Resident #42 physician orders revealed he has never had an indwelling catheter. During interview on 6/28/23 at 9:16 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed her expectation is for Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessments to be completed accurately. Interview on 6/28/23 at 2:09 PM with the MDS Coordinator revealed Resident #2 has never had an enteral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to assure the activity preferences of each resident were provided for 3 of 4 residents reviewed, (Resident #23, #22, and #42). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #23 scored 12 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident required limited assistance of 1 person for locomotion on and off the unit. The resident had diagnoses including legal blindness. The Care Plan identified the resident independent/dependent on staff in helping with meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs, revised 5/24/23. Interventions included she enjoyed television, introducing her to residents with similar background and interests, and encouraging/facilitating interaction, inviting to scheduled activities, providing with the activities calendar, and notifying her of any changes to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for 1 out of 15 residents reviewed (Resident #98). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings included: 1. Review of Progress Notes dated 5/16/2023 at 6:24 PM documented Resident #98 was eating dinner and was choking in the dining hall, Heimlich was performed, food was removed. On 6/27/23 at 2:36 PM further review of Resident #98 ' s medical record showed the facility failed to document additional information and details of the choking event. In an interview on 6/27/23 at 11:24 AM, Staff E, Certified Nurse Assistant, (CNA), reported on 5/16/23 that she witnessed staff performing the Heimlich Maneuver on Resident #98. In an interview on 6/27/23 at 11:44 AM, Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN), reported that she responded to Resident #98 during the choking event that occurred on 5/16/23. The Emergency Procedure - Choking policy dated August 2018 identified the person performing this procedure should record the following information in the resident ' s medical record:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,378 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $27,378 — penalty dated 2026-05-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CARE INITIATIVES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARE INITIATIVES | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/12/2010 |
| COMPUTERSHARE CORPORATE TRUST COMPANY, NA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| BEAL, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2020 |
| BOWEN, LANE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| CAROTHERS, MARY JANE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| CHILDS, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2023 |
| CORLESS, PETER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| KREIN, KEITH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/29/2022 |
| RUST, ELIZABETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| STURM, DENISE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| UPMEYER, LINDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/29/2022 |
| DIXON, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2016 |
| DRAKE, EMILY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| GILYARD, TANYA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/23/2025 |
| KUHN, JERAMY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/25/2008 |
| MCDYER, JESSICA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/22/2023 |
| BOEVE, DESTINY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| WILTFANG, PATRICIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/20/2025 |
| JURGENS, MICHAEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $336K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165329. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.