No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Atlantic Specialty Care

1300 East 19th Street, Atlantic, IA 50022 · Non profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (712) 243-3952 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (712) 243-3952 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 42 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
101 N Elm St · (712) 343-6540 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walmart0.9 mi
1905 E 7th St · (712) 243-9223 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Hy-Vee0.9 mi
1630 E 7th St · (712) 243-1278 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1630 E 22nd St · (712) 243-3542 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1011 E 13th St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.4%17.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%1.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.8%4.2%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.8%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.8%16.6%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.5%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.9%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.8%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.5%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.8%19.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication8.9%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.1%73.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.6%20.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.2%13.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.271.491.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.712.081.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.0%CMS range 35.4–64.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 7.5–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified55.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 3.8–13.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.30
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.96
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
28.3%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 75.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.96 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-09)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative in writing and the state ombudsman of a transfer to the hospital for 1 of 2 residents (#8). The facility also failed to provide a bed hold with reserve bed payment information for 2 of 2 residents (#6 & #8). The facility reported a census of 72 residents.Findings include:1.Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of cancer, heart failure, and respiratory failure. It revealed the resident was independent with eating, required maximal assistance with toileting, personal and oral hygiene, lower body dressing, and footwear, and required moderate assistance with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and mobility.The Care Plan dated 1/02/26 included impaired cognitive function related to poor safety awareness and directed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0, October 2025, the facility failed to complete and submit the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) in the required time frame for 1of 19 residents reviewed (Resident #83). The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: The MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #83 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicating normal cognition. On 4/8/26 the electronic clinical record MDS page revealed the MDS Admission, dated 3/30/26, was In Progress and the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) was 4/6/26, indicating the MDS admission was 2 days overdue. On 4/9/26 the electronic clinical record MDS page revealed the MDS Admission, dated 3/30/26, was Export Ready. The clinical record's clinical census revealed Resident #83 was admitted on [DATE]. On 4/6/36 at 1:34 PM the resident stated she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to develop a care plan to address risk factors and interventions for 1 out of 19 residents (Residents #54) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility reported a census of 72 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #54 dated 1/30/26 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS identified Resident #54 required supervision/touching assistance with transfers and ambulation. The MDS included diagnoses of vascular dementia with agitation and restlessness. The MDS documented Resident #54 received antianxiety medication during the last 7 days. A Physician order dated 2/5/26 directed staff to administer Lorazepam (antianxiety) 0.5 mg (milligrams) by mouth twice a day for restlessness and agitation.Resident #54's Wandering Evaluations documented the following scores and wandering risk:11/21/25- 16= High Risk (A score of 12 or above indicated high risk for wandering)12/4/25- 17= High…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care for 1 of 1 resident (#49). The facility reported a census of 72 residents.Findings include:Resident #49's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, a stroke, multiple sclerosis, and hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis). It indicated he required supervision with eating and was dependent with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and mobility. It also indicated he was always incontinent of bowel and bladder.The Care Plan revised 12/09/25 included bladder incontinence and directed staff to clean the peri-area with each incontinence episode. It revealed the resident was dependent with toileting and required 2-person staff assistance.During a continuous observation on 4/06/26 that began at 11:58 AM, Staff C, Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to lock the wheelchair for 1 of 16 residents dependent on mechanical lift transfers (#49). The facility reported a census of 72 residents.Findings include:Resident #49's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, a stroke, multiple sclerosis, and hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis). It indicated he required supervision with eating and was dependent with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and mobility. It also indicated he was always incontinent of bowel and bladder.The Care Plan revised 12/09/25 included bladder incontinence and directed staff to clean the peri-area with each incontinence episode. It revealed the resident was dependent with toileting and required 2-person staff assistance.A continuous observation on 4/06/26 that began at 11:58 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and policy review, the facility failed to provide the recommended influenza vaccine for 1 of 5 eligible residents (#2) and the recommended pneumococcal (pneumonia) vaccine for 1 of 5 eligible residents (#8). The facility reported a census of 72 residents.Findings include:1.Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of Parkinsonism (neurological movement disorder), high blood pressure, and respiratory failure. It revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] and had not received the seasonal influenza vaccine.A physician's order dated 11/06/25 indicated the resident may have the annual flu vaccine.The resident's admission Documents included a Vaccination Consent Form dated 11/06/25 that indicated the resident consented to receive the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, documentation review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to prepare, serve and distribute food in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to take and document temperatures of food in the kitchen prior to distribution. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: Continuous observation on 3/25/25 at 11:15 AM found Staff C, cook, began placing items on the steam table with temperatures taken upon removal from the stove or steamer. At 12:17 Staff C began the meal service without taking temperatures at the steam table. Staff B, Dietary Services Manager Assistant, delivered plates to the dining room, and the room tray carts to the nurses station for the nursing staff to deliver to the rooms. At 1:30 PM the meal service concluded with the last of the room trays leaving the kitchen to be delivered with a sample tray included. The staff did not obtain food temperatures from the steam table at the completion of the meal service. Observed food items moving to the steam table 1 hour before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and policies reviewed the facility failed to store, prepare, serve, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: Observation on 3/24/25 at 9:28 AM revealed the walk in cooler did not have an interior thermometer. The walk-in cooler contained opened and undated food items of a cake, canned fruit in dessert cups, and a jug of Half and Half. The Half and Half liquid had an aluminum foil covering and a best if used by date of 3/8/25. The walk-in freezer contained an opened bag of ravioli, not sealed and undated. The milk cooler contained thick darkened frost inside along the right side of the cooler. The reach-in refrigerator contained an undated opened jug of milk and a container containing a yellow substance that was undated. The pantry contained opened and undated packages of Oreo Medium Cookie Pieces and pasta. The bottom shelf of the large food preparation counter in the main part of the kitchen revealed food remnants, crumbs, and was dirty in appearance.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, hospital document review, staff interviews and facility assessment review the facility failed to implement care and treatment consistent with the resident care plan and physician orders placing the resident at risk for 1 of 16 residents reviewed. Resident #61 required special monitoring of weights and vital signs related to diagnosis of congestive heart failure. Staff failed to consistently monitor the weight and intervene with diuretic medication, and failed to conduct daily vital signs. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: The Office/Progress Note from the hospital referral (page 6) to the facility showed that Resident #61 presented to the hospital on 1/27/25 with Shortness of Breath (SOB) and hypoxic respiratory failure. Was taken for cardiac catheterization and stent's were placed in the heart. She had pulmonary edema and required oxygen and diuretics (increases urine production and lowers blood pressure and fluid retention.) She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview and clinical record review the facility failed to implement interventions for the prevention of pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. Resident #54 was at risk for chronic pressure injuries and was found to be without the treatment dressing or protective boots. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Stage III Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure that medications were secured to prevent residents from access. In an observation the survey team found an unlocked, unattended medication cart in the hallway of resident rooms. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: In an observation on 3/24/25 at 11:31 AM, it was discovered that an unlocked, unattended medication cart was at the end of a hallway of resident rooms. At 11:33 AM Staff I, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) came around the corner from the nurse's stations at the opposite end of the hallway. She said that she had been in a resident's room administering medications, then went down the hallway to talk to the nurse. She acknowledged that she failed to lock the drawers before she walked away from the cart. On 3/27/25 at 11:59 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) said that the nurses and CMA's were expected to have the medication cart locked if/when they ever walk away from it and it's not within eye site. According to facility policy titled: Security of Medication Cart,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, document review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide a well balanced diet that meets nutritional and special dietary needs by use of incorrect serving size portions for meals for 1 of 61 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: Continuous observation on 3/25/25 at 12:05 AM of Staff C, Cook, prepared modified barbeque (BBQ) pork for the noon meal. Staff C indicated needed 8 ground servings of BBQ pork. The staff removed 8 servings of the BBQ pork and placed 4 servings twice in the lid of the Robot Coupe food processor to transfer to the bowl of the Robo Coupe. The staff placed the lid on the processor, turned the machine on, and walked away. Staff C removed the BBQ pork from the processor and poured it into a measuring cup. The Registered Dietitian (RD) intervened as the BBQ pork appeared as pureed consistency rather than mechanical soft. The RD instructed Staff C to place it back in the processor, add BBQ sauce to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for 1 of 16 residents reviewed. Staff documented that the vital signs for Resident #61 had been completed and the chart lacked documentation of those vitals. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: The Care Plan for Resident #61, updated on 2/5/25, showed that she had diagnoses that included Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), acute respiratory failure, and weight fluctuation due to diuretic use and document signs and symptoms of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) such as dependent edema. The Progress Note dated 2/5/25 at 4:47 PM, showed that Resident #61 was admitted for skilled nursing services from the hospital after Atrial fibrillation (AFib) with rapid ventricular response RVR (condition characterized by an irregular heartbeat with a rate exceeding 100 beats per minute.) The Progress Note dated 2/5/25 at 6:38 PM, showed that Resident #61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that staff used appropriate infection control practices to prevent the spread of pathogens for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. Staff failed to change gloves after adjusting a soiled brief for Resident #27 she then touched other surfaces with the same gloved hand. The facility reported a census of 61 residents Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #27 had an indwelling catheter and a colostomy. He was totally dependent on staff for transfers, showers and personal hygiene. The resident had diagnoses that included: heart failure, renal insufficiency, multiple sclerosis and benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Care Plan last updated on 7/29/24 showed that Resident #27 had a Foley catheter and was at risk for a potential skin and soft tissue infections. Staff were instructed to use enhanced barrier precautions when performing high-contact care activities. On 3/25/25 at 7:04 AM, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide dignity by staff swearing in the hallways outside the residents' rooms for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #2 and #5) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings Include: 1. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #2, dated 8/8/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating normal cognitive functioning. The document revealed the resident had adequate hearing and did not utilize hearing appliances. On 10/22/24 at 12:43 PM Resident #2 stated he had heard staff using swearing when having conversations in the hall. The resident confirmed it was not another resident using swear words. Resident #2 stated the language that he heard did bother him. 2. Record review of Resident #5's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The document revealed the resident had adequate hearing, and did not utilize a hearing appliance.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and family interviews, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to provide the needed services in accordance with professional standards by not completing neuroogical assessments after falls for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #1 and #5) reviewed. Resident #1 self reported an unwitnessed fall from bed on 8/24/24 and sustained a hematoma on the right side of his forehead. Resident #5 had a witnessed fall involving a motorized scooter, and sustained a hematoma on the forehead and 3 skin tears on 9/12/24. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: 1. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1, dated 8/29/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. The resident was frequently incontinent of bladder and occasionally incontinent of bowel. The MDS documented diagnosis of hypertension, non-Alzheimer's Dementia, seizure disorder or epilepsy. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing staff to assure residents safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner for 4 of 6 residents (Resident #2, #3, #5, and #6). The facility reported a census of 57. Findings include: 1. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of Resident #2 dated 8/8/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicating normal cognitive functioning. The resident had diagnoses of displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur with routine healing, osteoarthritis, difficulty in walking, and low back pain. Resident #2 required partial/moderate assistance with transfers, lying to sitting on the edge of bed, and dressing. The resident was dependent on toileting. Resident #2 utilized a manual wheelchair (w/c) for mobility. The resident was always continent of bowels and bladder. On 10/22/24 at 12:43 PM Resident #2 stated he has waited longer than 30 minutes for a call light to be answered. The resident stated if he had to wait…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and policy reviews the facility failed to implement appropriate hand hygiene and infection control practices to mitigate the spread of pathogens during medication administration (Resident #8, #7, and #3). The facility reported a census of 63. 1. During continuous observation of medication administration on 8/12/24 at 11:40 AM Staff A, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) did not consistently complete hand hygiene between 4 residents. 2. During continuous observation of medication administration on 8/12/24 at 11:55 AM Staff B, CMA, did not complete consistent hand hygiene between 16 residents. 3. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating normal cognitive function, and the resident independent with toileting and transfers. Resident #8's Care Plan revealed the resident would transfer to the floor and independently use the toilet. At 12:55 PM on 8/12/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect residents from possible accidents and injuries for 2 of 3 residents (#3, #9). The facility reported a census of 63 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set ( MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating normal cognitive function. The resident used a manual wheelchair (w/c) and could propel up to 150 feet independently. Resident #3's care plan revealed the resident used a w/c for mobility. On 8/12/24 at 1:06 PM Staff B, Certified Medication Aide, pushed Resident #3 from the dining room to her room without the use of foot pedals. On 8/12/24 at 2:36 PM the resident stated she normally self propels her w/c. On 8/13/24 at 11:15 AM Resident #3 self propelled her w/c in the hallway. 2. Review of Resident #9's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 11/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident utilized a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-06 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report (October1 - December 31) review, facility staffing reports review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate staff reports for the PBJ Staffing Data Report. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: The PBJ Staffing Data Report run date 5/31/24 triggered for Excessively Low Weekend Staffing - submitted weekend staffing data is excessively low. Review of Facility Daily Assignment Sheets for each day of the months of October, November and December 2023 staffing revealed staffing for nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) scheduled similarly for weekdays and weekends. The month of December reflected 3 CNA's frequently on the overnight shift during the week and on weekends. On 6/5/24 at 12:06 PM the Administrator confirmed the submission of the data for the PBJ was not submitted correctly. The Administrator stated she spoke with Corporate. The Administrator stated Corporate told him that the report triggers this response because…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that residents received accurate and timely assessments and interventions for 5 of 6 residents reviewed. Staff failed to intervene when Resident #25 and #57 had significant weight loss. Resident #120 had a change in condition and staff failed to monitor vitals. Resident #59 was at risk for dehydration related to tube feedings and a catheter and staff failed to monitor his urinary output. Staff failed to complete the recommended neurological assessments after Resident #119 had an unwitnessed fall. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the MDS assessment dated [DATE], Resident #120 had a BIMS score of 0 (severe cognitive deficits). She was independent with eating, and totally dependent on staff for toileting, dressing, bed mobility and transfers. The Care Plan revised on 3/27/23, showed that Resident #120 used a wheelchair for mobility, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, grievance log review, clinical record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that call lights were answered in a timely manner for 11 of 21 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an acute hospital stay. He was totally dependent for toileting, transfers and lower body dressing. Resident #57 used a wheelchair for mobility and he was occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. Diagnoses for Resident #57 included diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression, chronic kidney disease, nutritional deficiency, acute pain, gangrene and necrosis of the lung. The Care Plan updated on 5/31/24, showed that Resident #57 had the potential for impairment to skin integrity related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature to 4 of 15 residents (Residents #7, #9, #38, and #60) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview on 6/3/24 at 12:11 PM Resident #7 stated the food is cold when it should be hot, and the food is overcooked. 2. Review of Resident #60's MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview on 6/3/24 at 11:42 AM Resident #60 stated the food is cold when it should be hot. Resident #60 further stated he wouldn't feed the food to his dog. During continuous observation on 6/5/24 at 1:12 PM the room trays and assisted meals were sent out of the kitchen to be delivered to the residents.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when providing personal care to a resident, during medication administration, and when providing care to a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBH) for 5 of 12 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of the Clinical Physician Orders for Resident #31 revealed an order for a coude catheter size 18 French to be changed monthly and as needed. On 6/5/24 at 8:01 AM a continuous observation of catheter cares completed on Resident #31 revealed Staff K, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) completed hand hygiene, donned a gown, and donned gloves. Staff K completed all catheter cares on Resident #31 with sleeves of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, family interview, staff interviews, clinical record review and personnel record review, the facility failed to ensure that all residents were treated with dignity and respect for 2 of 4 residents reviewed. Resident #57 reported that he has been left to sit on the bed pan for over 50 minutes and he felt upset and angry because he had a sore on his bottom. Resident #35 reported that staff scolded her for drinking too much water and urinating in the bed. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an acute hospital stay. He had moderately impaired vision, not able to see newspaper headlines but could identify objects. He was totally dependent for toileting, transfers and lower body dressing. Resident #57 used a wheelchair for mobility and he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to enter accurate assessment information in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 2 of 21 residents reviewed (Resident #36 and #33). The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the MDS dated [DATE], Resident #36 had a BIMS score of 9 (moderate cognitive deficit). The resident was independent with hygiene, dressing, transferring and walking. Diagnoses included hypertension, Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety and muscle weakness. The MDS documented the resident was on an antiplatelet medication. An MDS dated [DATE] showed that he was on an anticoagulant (warfarin, heparin, or low-molecular weight heparin). The Care Plan for Resident #36 revised on 10/25/23 indicated that Resident #36 was on anticoagulant/blood thinning medication related to left anterior fascicular block. The Clinical Physician Orders revealed an order for clopidogrel (Plavix, antiplatelet) 75 milligrams (mg) dated 7/28/23. 2. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic record review (EHR), observations, policy review, resident interview, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a comprehensive care plan that included goals or interventions for activities or activities of interests and documented insulin on a care plan for a resident who was not on insulin for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #61). The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 indicating severe cognitive impairment. An observation on 6/3/24 at 2:38 PM of Resident #61 sitting at bingo by herself with no markers on the bingo card. No staff helping with the activity. On 6/3/24 at 2:39 PM Resident #61 stated she was not interested in playing bingo at that time. An observation on 6/03/24 at 3:40 PM of Resident #61 sitting in the dayroom with several other residents sleeping. An observation on 6/4/24 at 2:30 PM revealed activity staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and facility policy review the facility failed to update resident care plans with changes. Resident #57 admitted to the facility on insulin for type 2 diabetes. The order was discontinued on 4/15/24 due to lack of use. Staff failed to update the care plan. Resident #36 was on an antiplatelet medication (Plavix). Staff failed to use the proper classification on the care plan and referred to the medication as an anticoagulant/blood thinner. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an acute hospital stay. Diagnosis for Resident #57 included diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression, chronic kidney disease, nutritional deficiency, acute pain, gangrene and necrosis of the lung. He had some coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, resident interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 21 residents reviewed. Resident #57 had chronic skin damage on his gluteal area related to moisture and positioning. In an observation it was discovered that the ordered barrier cream and treatments were not in place. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an acute hospital stay. He was totally dependent for toileting, transfers and lower body dressing. Resident #57 used a wheel chair for mobility and he was occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. Diagnosis for Resident #57 included diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression, chronic kidney disease, nutritional deficiency, acute pain, gangrene and necrosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic record review (EHR), resident observation, policy review, resident interviews, and staff interviews the facility failed to implement resident centered activities for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #61). The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 indicating severe cognitive impairment. An observation on 6/3/24 at 2:38 PM of Resident #61 sitting at bingo by herself with no markers on the bingo card. No staff helping with the activity. On 6/3/24 at 2:39 PM Resident #61 stated she was not interested in playing bingo at that time. An observation on 6/3/24 at 3:40 PM of Resident #61 sitting in the dayroom with several other residents sleeping. An observation on 6/4/24 at 2:30 PM revealed activity staff sitting outside with residents. Resident #61 not present at that time. An observation on 6/5/24 at 11:44 AM revealed Resident #61 sitting in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical document review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide services to increase range of motion or prevent a decrease in range of motion for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #42) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #42 dated 4/25/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further documented diagnosis of hemiplegia following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side. Review of Resident #42's Care Plan revealed a restorative plan for omni cycle or nu step 10-15 minutes 3 times weekly and PRN (As necessary). Review of Resident #42's restorative program documents for the month of 5/2024 revealed no documentation of minutes for the month along with no signatures of completion. During an interview on 6/5/24 at 3:03 PM with Resident #42 revealed his insurance discharged him from therapy at the beginning of May of this year. Resident #42 revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on electronic health records review (EHR), staff interviews, policy review, and observations, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures regarding the technical aspect of feeding tubes by not accurately administering supplemental formula according to physician's order and pushing medications with a piston syringe into feeding tube for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #59) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #59, dated 4/25/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score indicating the resident is rarely / never understood. The MDS documented a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for nutrition. Review of Resident #59's Clinical Physician Orders documented PEG Tube feedings: Osmolite 1.5 Cal continuous feed at 60 mL/hr over 12 hours. Osmolite 1.5 provides 1078 kcal. 45 grams protein, and 550 mL of water. Tap water flush q1h at 60ml Start 8pm and off 8am. In an observation on 6/4/24 at 4:00 AM it was discovered that the tube feeding for Resident #59 was set for 70…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review the facility failed to conduct post-dialysis assessments for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #57). The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an acute hospital stay. Diagnosis for Resident #57 included diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression, chronic kidney disease, nutritional deficiency, acute pain, gangrene and necrosis of the lung. Resident #57 had hemodialysis treatments while a resident at the facility. The Care Plan updated on 5/31/24, showed that Resident #57 was at increase nutritional risk related to chronic kidney disease and diabetes. The resident to receive hemodialysis related to end stage renal disease. Staff directed to monitor and report any signs or symptoms of renal insufficiency On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to document accurate information in the residents electronic file for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls. Resident #119 had an unwitnessed fall and staff began neurological assessments to determine change in status. The neuro assessments included notation that the vital signs had been completed as directed. Further review revealed the chart lacked the vital signs. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 (severe cognitive deficits). She required partial assistance with toileting, dressing, hygiene, sit to stand and toilet transfers. She did have 1 fall with minor injury since admission. The Care Plan created on 5/21/24, showed that she was at risk for falls, and interventions included encouragement to use the call light, and a physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to assure each resident received care in a manner that maintained privacy of a resident's body for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #4 scored 11 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses including neurogenic bladder and Parkinson's disease. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. The Care Plan identified the resident had a suprapubic dated 2/15/24. The interventions included catheter care for every shift. The Care Plan identified the resident had a skin and soft tissue diabetic wound infection located right heel/side of foot revised 2/2/24. The interventions included administering treatments as ordered. The Care Plan identified the resident had a diabetic ulcer of the right heel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to assure a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers from developing, promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #6 scored 7 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident depended on staff for toileting hygiene and traveling in the wheelchair, and required partial to moderate assist in chair to bed transfer, and rolling in bed. The resident did not walk. The resident had diagnoses including acute kidney failure, diabetes, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The resident did not have pressure ulcers, but was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. The Braden scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interviews, family interviews, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #7, #2, #15 and #10). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status of 15 out of 15 indicating no cognition impairments. The MDS also documented she is dependent on staff to assist her with transferring to the toilet and from bed to her chair. Resident #7's active diagnoses include cancer, paraplegia, and diabetes. During an interview on 12/11/23 at 11:23 AM with Resident #7 revealed staff at the facility are nice to her for the most part. She stated some staff can sometimes be short and not so nice, but she doesn't want to get anyone in trouble. She then proceeded to explain a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) is no longer allowed to work with her because they do not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interviews, family interviews, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with routine toileting assistance throughout the day to avoid being incontinent for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #7, #15, #9 and #10). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairments. The MDS also documented she is dependent on staff to assist her with transferring to the toilet and from her bed to her chair. Resident #7's active diagnosis include cancer, paraplegia, and diabetes. During an interview on 12/11/23 at 11:23 AM Resident #7 stated she is incontinent and only gets her underwear changed about twice a day and has to sit in her urine for a long time waiting for them to change her. She also stated she is ok with being changed twice a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify family after an incident for 1 of 3 residents. Resident #9 sustained an injury to her leg when her motorized wheel chair ran into the bed frame and staff failed to call the family after the incident. The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #9 had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognitive ability. The MDS documented she used a motorized wheel chair, was frequently incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. The Care Plan updated on 7/18/23, documented Resident #9 required staff assistance for activities of daily living, required the help of 2 staff for transfers, and used an electric wheelchair for mobility. The Care Plan also documented the resident required the assistance of 2 staff for toileting and repositioning. An addition was made to the Care Plan on 11/14/23 that showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interview, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to provide timely and complete assessments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. Resident #9 sustained an injury on her leg after she ran her electric wheel chair into the bed and her leg got wedged under the bed frame. The facility failed to assess for safe use of an electric wheel chair and failed to provide ongoing monitoring and documentation of the cellulitis of the leg that ensued after the accident. The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #9 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognitive ability. The MDS documented she used a motorized wheel chair, was frequently incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. The Care Plan updated on 7/18/23, documented Resident #9 required staff assistance for activities of daily living and required the help of 2 staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) was provided adequate nursing supervision to prevent him from exiting the building. The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool dated 8/1/23, documented Resident #4 Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she required supervision with one-person physical assistance for bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. The MDS documented he utilized a cane for mobility and did not use a wander/elopement alarm. The following diagnoses were documented for Resident #4: stage 3 kidney disease, dementia with behavior disturbances. The Care Plan focus area with an initiation date of 7/26/23 documented Resident #4 required staff assistance for activities of daily living. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure that staff responded to call lights in a timely manner for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. Resident's #15 and #9 stated that during the evening and overnight hours, at times it took over an hour for staff to respond to the call lights and they became incontinent because they had to wait so long. The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognitive ability. The Care Plan dated 11/25/23, documented Resident #15 was admitted to the facility to receive occupational and physical therapy with goals to transition back to home, was unable to ambulate independently and utilized a wheel chair for mobility. The Care Plan documented he had a urinary catheter and required 2 staff for assistance in toileting and for transfers. It documented he had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARE INITIATIVES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avoca Specialty CareAvoca, IA 1 of 5Correctionville Specialty CareCorrectionville, IA 1 of 5Crestview Specialty CareWest Branch, IA 1 of 5Heritage Specialty CareCedar Rapids, IA 1 of 5Kingsley Specialty CareKingsley, IA 1 of 5Parkridge Specialty CarePleasant Hill, IA 1 of 5Ravenwood Specialty CareWaterloo, IA 1 of 5Westwood Specialty CareSioux City, IA 2 of 5Chariton Specialty CareChariton, IA 2 of 5Creston Specialty CareCreston, IA 2 of 5Dubuque Specialty CareDubuque, IA 2 of 5Lantern Park Specialty CareCoralville, IA 2 of 5New London Specialty CareNew London, IA 2 of 5Northcrest Specialty CareWaterloo, IA 2 of 5Northern Mahaska Specialty CareOskaloosa, IA 2 of 5Pinnacle Specialty CareCedar Falls, IA 2 of 5Southridge Specialty CareMarshalltown, IA 2 of 5Stratford Specialty CareStratford, IA 3 of 5Centerville Specialty CareCenterville, IA 3 of 5Cherokee Specialty CareCherokee, IA 3 of 5Eldora Specialty CareEldora, IA 3 of 5Manly Specialty CareManly, IA 3 of 5Montezuma Specialty CareMontezuma, IA 3 of 5Odebolt Specialty CareOdebolt, IA 3 of 5Panora Specialty CarePanora, IA 3 of 5Ridgewood Specialty CareOttumwa, IA 3 of 5Southern Hills Specialty CareOsceola, IA 3 of 5West Ridge Specialty CareKnoxville, IA 4 of 5Bedford Specialty CareBedford, IA 4 of 5Belle Plaine Specialty CareBelle Plaine, IA 4 of 5Corning Specialty CareCorning, IA 4 of 5Corydon Specialty CareCorydon, IA 4 of 5Dunlap Specialty CareDunlap, IA 4 of 5Laporte City Specialty CareLa Porte City, IA 4 of 5Lyon Specialty CareRock Rapids, IA 4 of 5Oakwood Specialty CareAlbia, IA 5 of 5Fonda Specialty CareFonda, IA 5 of 5Lamoni Specialty CareLamoni, IA 5 of 5Mechanicsville Specialty CareMechanicsville, IA 5 of 5Sibley Specialty CareSibley, IA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CARE INITIATIVESOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2013
COMPUTERSHARE CORPORATE TRUST COMPANY, NAOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 11/01/2021
BEAL, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2020
BOWEN, LANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
CAROTHERS, MARY JANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
CHILDS, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2023
CORLESS, PETERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
KREIN, KEITHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
RUST, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
STURM, DENISEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
UPMEYER, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
DIXON, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2016
DRAKE, EMILYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/04/2023
KUHN, JERAMYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/25/2008
MCDYER, JESSICAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/22/2023
BOEVE, DESTINYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
MUHLBAUER, LEAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
WEI, SHIPENGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$638K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 8%Other / private 13%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $638K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$246per resident / day
operating cost
$7,470per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$282per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165288. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next