No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heritage Specialty Care

200 Clive Drive SW, Cedar Rapids, IA 52404 · For profit - Corporation · 171 certified beds · (319) 396-7171 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0741)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$14,365 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $14,365 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-06)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
200 Clive Dr SW · (319) 396-7171 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3419 16th Ave SW · (319) 396-3262 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4220 16th Ave SW · (319) 396-4585 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3855 Midway Dr NW · (319) 286-5566 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
50 Edgewood Rd NW · (319) 390-3520

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.3%17.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%1.5%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.9%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.4%4.2%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.8%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.2%16.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.6%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.1%95.3%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.8%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.3%19.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.0%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine67.4%73.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.7%20.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.3%13.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.841.491.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.182.081.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
44.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.5%CMS range 37.2–62.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.5–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge44.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge22.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge25.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.4–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.53
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
48.9%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 171 beds and averages 119.4 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-28)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, family interviews, resident interviews, policy review, and observations the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for adequate supervision (Resident #21 and #26). The facility failed to ensure the resident's safety by allowing Resident #21 to leave the facility with a male friend without the consent and knowledge of the resident's Guardian and failed to ensure a resident's safety by failing to complete a thorough search of the premises after a Wander guard alert system sounded. These failures resulted in possible endangerment for both residents, therefore causing an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to the health, safety and security of two residents. The facility reported a census of 152 residents. On August 1, 2023 at 1:39 pm, the State Survey Agency (SA) informed the facility of the staff's failure to ensure a cognitively impaired resident's Guardian gave permission for their loved one to leave the locked Dementia unit with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff and resident interview and facility policy review the facility failed to provide safe transfers for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #6, #7). The facility reported a census of 115 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident#1 dated 8/1/25, listed diagnoses of stroke, high blood pressure (HTN), heart failure, non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Bipolar disorder, seizure disorder. The MDS reflected the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 intact cognition. The MDS identified Resident #1 dependent on staff for transfers, dressing, toileting, and hygiene. The Care Plan for Resident#1 reflected a revision date of 5/8/25, directed she needed the assistance of two staff and the stand lift to transfer. The Nurse Progress Note dated 8/19/2025 at 3:30 PM revealed an Incident, Accident, Unusual Occurrence Note Provider notified on call aware situation and laceration to left side head. New order to send to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident, family and staff interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for two of three residents reviewed (Residents #2 and #3). The facility reported a census of 118 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 as cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14 and had the following diagnoses: Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Wound Infection, and Diabetes Mellitus. The MDS also identified Resident #2 to be totally dependent on staff assistance for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and transfers from bed to chair or toilet. A review of the Facility Incident Report dated 5/23/25 at 6:30 AM, had documentation of the following: Resident #2 received Resident #7's medications in error. Resident #2 did not have a profile picture on file, no name tag on door, and was responding to the name for Resident #7 during conversation that morning. Resident #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly assess and intervene after administration of a rapid acting insulin (without consuming the meal) to 1 of 3 residents reviewed with orders for insulin (Resident #1). This resulted in the resident becoming unresponsive with a blood glucose of 25 and being sent to the hospital. The facility reported a census of 118 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 as severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 0 and had the following diagnoses: Heart Failure, Urinary Tract Infection, and Diabetes Mellitus. The MDS identified Resident #1 was dependent on staff assistance for most activities of daily living with the exception of eating and oral hygiene. Observations of Resident #1 could not be completed as she was still hospitalized during the investigation. On 5/17/25, the Care Plan identified Resident #1 with the problem of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-06-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident, family and staff interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for two of three residents reviewed (Residents #2 and #3). The facility reported a census of 118 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 as cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14 and had the following diagnoses: Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Wound Infection, and Diabetes Mellitus. The MDS also identified Resident #2 to be totally dependent on staff assistance for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and transfers from bed to chair or toilet.A review of the Facility Incident Report dated 5/23/25 at 6:30 AM, had documentation of the following:Resident #2 received Resident #7's medications in error.Resident #2 did not have a profile picture on file, no name tag on door, and was responding to the name for Resident #7 during conversation that morning. Resident #2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain medication when scheduled for 1 of 1 residents that wore a Fentanyl patch (opioid medication) (Resident #109), resulting in this resident reporting being in severe pain. This resident was to have a Fentanyl patch applied on 8/19/24 at 1800. It was not applied until the morning of 8/21/24. The facility reported a census of 140 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #109's diagnoses included Malignant Neoplasm of tongue (cancer), hip fracture, and depression. A Brief Interview for Mental Status score was documented as 12 out of 15, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. This MDS documented that Resident #109 experienced pain almost constantly in the prior 5 days. On 08/19/24 at 10:55 a.m., Resident #109 was sitting on her bed in a private room. This resident stated she was in pain. Stated her mouth hurt and she had a broken hip. A Progress Note dated 8/19/24 at 2:17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food safety to reduce the risk of food borne illness. The facility reported a census of 127 residents.Findings include:During continuous observation on 5/6/25 from 11:00 AM to 11:24 AM, Staff C, Dietary [NAME] washed her hands and used two towels to remove a steam pan of rice and then a steam pan of pork stir fry from the convection oven. The two towels were placed on the preparation table surface. Staff C scooped the proper amount of rice and pork stir fry for 7 pureed meals. Staff C wiped her hand on one of the towels on the preparation table. Staff C opened a bread bag and donned gloves. Staff C (with gloved hands) used tongs to place 5 slices of bread on a cutting board. Staff C operated the robo coupe with gloved hand used a scoop to add more of the liquid from the pork stir fry. With the same gloved hands, Staff C operated the robo coupe. With the same gloved hands, Staff C used tongs to remove 2 additional slices of bread from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility document review, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a discharge for 3 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #13, Resident #122, and Resident #126). The facility reported a census of 127 residents.Findings include:1. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) Clinical Census information for Resident #13 revealed an entry of hospital paid leave effective 3/28/26. A Progress Note dated 3/29/26 at 6:34 AM documented Resident #13 had been admitted to the hospital. Review of the Notice of Transfer Form to Long Term Care Ombudsman lacked Resident #13's 3/28/26 hospitalization. 2. Review of the EHR Clinical Census information for Resident #126 revealed an entry of hospital paid leave effective 2/24/26 and an entry of stop billing effective 2/28/26. A Progress Note dated 2/24/26 at 1:56 PM documented Resident #126 had been sent to the emergency room for surgical opinion. The Progress Notes lacked documentation Resident #126 had been admitted to the hospital. A Progress Note dated 2/27/26 at 12:00 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to accurately reflect resident condition for a feeding tube, and to accurately reflect Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Level II for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #3 and Resident #105). The facility reported a census of 127 residents.Findings Include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #3 dated 8/23/25 showed Resident #3 was not considered by the state level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. The MDS listed diagnoses of depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Resident #3's chart held the Notice of PASRR Level Il Outcome dated 3/27/25. The Level II directed Resident #3 needed the level of services provided in a nursing facility and needed specialized services for behavioral health and/or developmental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure post dialysis assessments and fistula assessments were consistently completed in accordance with physician orders, facility policy, and the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident #84). The facility reported a census of 127 residents.Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #84 dated 2/27/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Per this assessment, the resident had a diagnosis of dependence on renal dialysis, and received dialysis while a resident. Review of Resident #84's Care Plan focus area dated 5/6/25 revealed the resident received hemodialysis related to end stage renal disease (ESRD), and had an arteriovenous (AV) fistula to the left upper extremity (LUE). The Intervention dated 5/6/25 revealed staff to listen to and feel the dialysis site (the fistula) to ensure it was functioning correctly. This was required before dialysis, after dialysis, and on days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and interviews the facility failed to address trauma history, PTSD triggers, signs of distress, non-pharmacological interventions, or medication in assessments and care plans for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (Resident #112). The facility reported a census of 127 residents.Findings include:admission paperwork for Resident #112 scanned to the facility on 2/20/2026 documented the resident took 1 milligram (mg) of prazosin at bedtime for chronic PTSD with trauma related nightmares. Resident #112's care plan with an admission date of 3/02/2026 did not include focus areas, goals, or interventions for PTSD, nightmares, trauma, or prazosin.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #112 dated 3/08/2026 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3/15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. MDS diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, and depression. The box for PTSD was not checked.A document titled Progress Notes dated 4/07/2026 revealed the resident's provider conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and policy review the facility failed to maintain documentation of staff screening and education regarding COVID vaccination, or maintain records of staff vaccination status. The facility reported a census of 127 residents.Findings include:On 5/07/2026 at 10:16 AM Staff K, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), stated she was the facility's infection preventionist. When asked when staff received education regarding COVID testing and vaccination, she stated the same provider who vaccinated residents could give the education to staff. Staff K did not have documentation of who received that education. She indicated she would have to see if there was COVID training in (redacted) their training platform or during orientation because she wasn't involved in all of that. During an interview on 5/07/2026 at 10:38 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) reported the staff received COVID education through (redacted) their training provider. The DON directed back to Staff K for documentation regarding COVID based on her role as infection preventionist. A document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide baths for 3 of 9 residents sampled (Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 123. Findings include: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 list of diagnoses included heart failure, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a left diabetic foot ulcer. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS assessed the resident required moderate assistance of 1 staff for bathing. Resident #4's Care Plan dated 6/27/25, directed the moderate assistance of 1 staff for bathing. During an interview with the resident on 2/23/26 at 10:52 am, he stated he did not get a shower at all last week, he is to have his showers on Wednesday and Saturdays. The resident stated staff told him they did not have enough staff to give him his shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, facility policy review, provider interview, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to complete wound care as ordered, and failed to assure a resident attended schedule appointments for 1 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 123 residents.Findings include: Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a list of diagnoses which included heart failure, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, and a left diabetic foot ulcer. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicated intact cognition. The MDS assessed Resident #4 alert, oriented and could give accurate information. The MDS identified the resident required moderate assistance of 1 staff for dressing, toileting, bathing and walking. The resident utilized a walker in their room and a wheelchair outside of their room.Review of Care Plan, revised 11/12/25, revealed a Focus area to address I am at increased risk for skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of food temperature logs, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide food that is palatable for 1 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 123 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a list of diagnoses which included heart failure, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, and a left diabetic foot ulcer. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicated the resident's cognition intact. The MDS assessed Resident #4 alert, oriented and could give accurate information. Review of Resident #4's care plan initiated on 6/25/25, the care plan directed staff to provide a diet low in sodium, regular texture and thin liquids as the resident is at a risk due to his chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure and kidney disease and to monitor his tolerance of the diet that is ordered. During an interview with Resident #4 on 2/23/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the call light accessible for Resident #3, Resident #6, and for multiple residents observed in resident rooms. The facility reported a census of 118 residents. Findings include: 1.The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/24/2025 revealed Resident #6 had no cognitive impairment, required moderate assistance of staff to transfer from bed to chair and had a history of falls. The resident had diagnoses including heart failure and neoplasm of the pelvis. The resident's care plan reported the resident had a history of falls. It directed staff to encourage the resident to use the call light. Observation on 8/18/2025 at 8:25 am revealed the resident sat up in bed eating breakfast. The resident's soft touch call light sat on the bedside stand out of reach, and the bed control sat on the floor. The resident indicated she could not reach the call light and stated she would yell for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, maintenance record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment. The facility reported a census of 118 residents. Findings include: Observation on 8/18/25 at 8:00 am revealed a large, blackened area on the carpet in the main lobby area, located between the conference room and Administrator's office. The blackened area measured approximately 15 feet long by 6 feet wide. Observation on 8/19/25 at 8:46 am revealed the carpet at the entrance of the skilled unit coming from Station 3 had a darkened area which measured approximately 13 feet long by 3 feet in width. On 8/20/2025 at 10:25 a.m., Staff C, DON (Director of Nursing) reported when she first started in June, the facility had a resident who had a visitor who brought some things in from home, and they discovered bed bugs. They isolated the belongings, bagged them up, and treated the room. On 8/20/2025 at 11:25 am, Staff D, the Corporate Director of Facilities manager, revealed the facility had the carpet cleaned two times in the last six…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Statement of Deficiencies form, the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, and staff interview the facility failed to carry out Quality Assurance activities to ensure effective measures had been taken to correct deficiencies and prevent their ongoing prevalence. The facility reported a census of 118 residents. Findings include:The CMS 2567, dated June 12, 2025 reflected deficiencies identified for medication administration. The current complaint survey, conducted 8/18/2025 - 8/26/2025 also identified the above concern. In an interview on 8/20/2025 at 2:00 pm, the Administrator explained the QAPI team met monthly to discuss the Performance Improvement Projects (PIP) and quarterly with the full team. Data was collected via an online program, suggestion boxes, grievance forms, and when the [State Agency] found a deficiency. The facility prioritized the issues that impinged on residents' quality of life or rights. She explained there was a PIP in place for the previous survey deficiency but they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, observations and policy review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for one of three residents reviewed (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 118 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had an admission date of 8/12/25. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9 out of 15, which revealed moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses which included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Traumatic Brain Injury and anxiety. The resident required partial/moderate assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the Facility Incident Report dated 8/12/25 at 11:53 am revealed the following: Resident #8 received another's medication in error on 8/13/25 during morning medication pass. The Incident Report revealed the facility received a phone call from the pharmacy provider reporting they sent the wrong medications for Resident #8. The pharmacy placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, and clinical record review the facility failed to offer toileting assistance for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 118 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had no memory impairment, required partial assistance for transfers from one surface to another and had diagnoses including stroke and hemiplegia. The Care Plan revealed the resident had a fall risk dated 10/12/2024, and it directed staff to encourage the use of a call light and ensure it is within reach.On 7/30/2025, Staff B, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported when she arrived to work, she heard the resident calling out for assistance and rattling the bed rail. Staff B observed the resident's call light on the wall and out of reach. The resident had been incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Facility Incident Report dated 7/30/2025 included the resident reported the third shift aide failed to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to consistently monitor the functioning of the dishwasher and failed to ensure adequate kitchen sanitation for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The facility reported a census of 118 residents. Findings include: 1. The initial kitchen tour on 5/19/25 at 10:05 a.m. revealed the following concerns: a. A fan above the hand washing sink was covered with mesh and a thick layer of dust covered the mesh and the fan blades. The fan blew toward the left hand side of the dishwasher where clean dishes emerged. b. Staff B, Dietary Staff washed dishes and when requested to test the functioning of the dishwasher she obtained a strip but then stated she did not know how to complete the test. Staff B stated she did not test the machine that morning before doing breakfast dishes. The Dietary Manager was present and could not locate a log of dishwasher function tests. c. The top of the dishwasher was covered with yellow chunks of debris. d. The fire suppression system spigots had dust particles hanging…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to change oxygen tubing on 1 out of 1 concentrator for residents with physician orders for oxygen (Resident #14). The facility reported a census of 118 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #14 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicates no cognitive impairment. It further indicated diagnoses including: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory failure, and anxiety. The MDS indicated Resident #14 required moderate assist from staff for transfers, bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of the Care Plan dated 4/22/24 revealed Resident #14 altered respiratory status and utilizes oxygen. Observed Resident #14 on 05/20/25 at 10:36 AM with oxygen on in their wheelchair at 1.5 liter per nasal cannula from a tank. The tubing did not have a label with date tubing was changed. The oxygen concentrator in residents room had a label with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, menu review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet received the correct portion sizes and food items in accordance with the menu for 1 of 1 meal observed. The facility reported a census of 118 residents. Findings include: The Diet Type Report listed 4 residents with an order for a pureed diet. On 5/20/25 at 10:00 a.m., Staff C, Dietary Services Manager Assistant stated he would prepare puree Salisbury steak for 6 residents but stated he would make 1 extra. Staff C placed 7 steaks, 3 slices of bread, and gravy into the food processor, ground this up, and placed it into a graduate which measured 3 cups. Staff C stated he wanted the total amount to be 5 cups so he added 3 more steaks, hot water, and 2 more sliced of bread. He then poured the mixture into the graduate which measured 6 cups. Staff C then looked at the Pureed Diet Portion Sizes/Scoops poster on the wall and stated he would use a #8 scoop (4 ounce). The Pureed Diet Portion Sizes/Scoops chart directed staff to utilize 2 #8 scoops for 6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to follow the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2025 Adult Immunization Schedule for pneumococcal vaccination for 1 of 5 residents sampled (Resident #41). The facility identified a census of 118 residents. Findings include: Resident #41 Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) Census documented admission to the facility on 1/09/23. The EHR Immunization Record documented Resident #41 received a pneumococcal 23 vaccination on 10/15/2017 at the age of 54. A Consent for Pneumococcal Vaccination signed by Resident #41 on 1/09/23 showed the Resident circled she accepted to receive the vaccination. An Order Summary Report signed by the Provider on 10/08/24 showed an active order as of 1/09/23 for a pneumococcal vaccination to be administered if applicable. A 11/30/2024 9:31 Pharmacy Consultant Review Progress Note recommended a Prevnar 20 vaccination. A 12/28/2024 4:49 PM Pharmacy Consultant Review Progress Note recommended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess and document follow up skin assessments for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 131 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses that included anemia, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease (stage 5) requiring dialysis, right femur fracture, diabetes, and depression. The MDS indicated the resident required extensive assistance with toileting, positioning, and transfers, had skin tears and was at risk for pressure ulcers. Resident #1 received antidepressant, diuretic, and antiplatelet medications during the observation period. The Care Plan initiated 1/16/25 with a revision date of 2/3/25 revealed the resident had impairment to the right upper leg related to a surgical incision with a goal of no complications related to skin impairment. Interventions included monitoring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff, resident, and family interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe transfer for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #10). The facility failed to utilize a gait belt during a 2 person transfer as directed by the Care Plan. The facility reported a census of 131 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS indicated the resident carried diagnoses that included non-displaced bicondylar fracture of left tibia, dementia, and Alzheimer's disease. Resident #10 was wheelchair dependent and required moderate assistance for toileting, extensive assistance for bathing, dependent on staff for personal hygiene, and maximum assistance with transfers. The resident received antianxiety, Opioid, and antiplatelet medication. Review of Resident #10's Care Plan dated 1/22/25 revealed a focus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and family interviews, and policy review the facility failed to complete pain assessments as directed, update Narcotic Records with changes in medication prescriptions, and complete follow up assessments when pain interventions were ineffective for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 131 residents. Findings include: Resident #10 was admitted to Heritage Specialty Care on 1/22/25 for aftercare following a left tibial plateau fracture sustained sometime in the 3 weeks prior to her hospitalization from multiple falls at home. The resident was moved from the Rehab Unit to the Chronic Confusion or Dementing Illness (CCDI) Unit on 2/13/25 due to exit seeking and wandering behaviors. The resident was admitted to hospice care on 2/21/25 for vascular dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, policy reviews, and observations the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike, and safe environment. The facility reported a census of 134 residents. Observations on 2/3/25 at 9:05 am with Staff A-LPN revealed the following: a. Observation at 9:10 am revealed 15 4-person tables and 1-6 person table with black metal bases, each table base revealed dust accumulation and dried food particles splattered on the bases of each table. b. Observation at 9:20 am revealed at the entrance of the skilled unit across from the nurses station, the base of the North pillar had exposed insulation material with approximately 1/2 of the original wood covering noted to be missing. c. Observation at 9:30 am revealed the bottom of the wall directly next to the janitors closet on 3-B Hall revealed a hole in the wall behind and directly above the rubber baseboard. The hole measured approximately 12 inches long and 6 inches high. Staff B states this is probably the result of a resident driving an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for wound treatments for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 134 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #4 had diagnoses which included non-pressure chronic lower leg ulcers, diabetes, renal insufficiency, stroke, and heart failure. According to the Brief Interview for Mental Status (MDS) score, the resident had a score of 15, which indicted the resident had intact cognitive ability. The MDS indicated the resident received daily dressing changes. Review of Resident #4's Care Plan dated 1/20/25, informed staff the resident had impaired skin to both lower extremities with open wounds. The Care Plan directed the staff to monitor and document location, size, and treatment of skin injury. Observation on 2/4/25 at 10:00 am revealed the resident sitting in a recliner as Staff A-LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and observations the facility failed to send a resident's medications for an off campus appointment for 1 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 144 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #2 had diagnoses which include debility, cardiac respiratory condition, heart failure, renal failure, diabetes, and Chronic Obstruction Pulmonary Disease. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 which indicated she was alert and oriented. The resident required partial assistance of 1 staff for transfers and ambulation, and substantial assistance for dressing. Review of the Care Plan dated 12/22/2023 informed the staff the resident had diabetes mellitus and to administer the diabetic medications according to the physician's orders. Review of a Physician's Order dated 7/18/24 directed staff to administer Insulin Aspart Solution 4 units subcutaneous three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews and observations, the facility failed to provide adequate oxygen services for 1 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reports a census of 144 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #2 had diagnoses which include debility, cardiac respiratory condition, heart failure, renal failure, diabetes, and Chronic Obstruction Pulmonary Disease. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 which indicated she was alert and oriented. The resident required partial assistance of 1 staff for transfers and ambulation, and substantial assistance for dressing. The resident utilized oxygen therapy. Review of the Care Plan dated 12/22/2023 informed the staff the resident utilizes oxygen therapy related to ineffective air exchange. The Care Plan directed the staff to administer oxygen to the resident as ordered. During an interview with Resident #2 on 11/19/24 at 8:30 am, the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and observations the facility failed to follow a physician's order for wound treatment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 143 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #4 had diagnoses which included Non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Parkinson's, dementia, chronic pain, and a history of falls. The resident could ambulate independently in her room with the aide of a wheeled walker. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident had 1 fall since the prior assessment completed on 7/5/24 which resulted in skin tears. Review of the Care Plan dated 8/19/24, the family reported the resident had a fall in her room but had the ability at that time to get herself up from the floor. The Care Plan directed the staff to remind the resident to use the call light to ask for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and observations the facility failed to answer resident call lights within 15 minutes of activation for 2 of 6 residents reviewed (Residents #4 and #10). The facility reported a census of 143 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #4 had diagnoses which included Non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Parkinson's, dementia, chronic pain, and a history of falls. The resident could ambulate independently in her room with the aide of a wheeled walker. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the Care Plan dated 8/19/24 the family reported the resident had a fall in her room and had the ability at that time to get herself up from the floor. The Care Plan directed the staff to remind the resident to use the call light to ask for assistance. Observation on 10/14/24 at 10:45 am revealed Resident #4 sitting on her bed, the room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, document review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment. The facility reported a census of 140 residents. Findings include: 1. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score Evaluation Scoring Report provided by the facility on 8/19/24 detailed Resident #61 and Resident #71 with BIMS scores of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. On 8/19/24 at 2:15 PM Resident #61 reported his room just got cleaned today because the State was here. He reported it had been approximately three weeks since his floors has been cleaned in the room. The rooms are just plain dirty. Resident #61's roommate also chimed in and said, everything he is saying is true. Observation at this time reveal a black built up substance splattered across the floor in front of the bedside stand and the bed. The black substance could be scraped up off the floor but did not come up easily. The Surveyor noted a housekeeper had her cart parked in front of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for catheter care (Resident #71). The facility identified a census of 140 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented Resident #71 as dependent upon staff for toileting and utilized an indwelling urinary catheter for diagnosis of neurogenic bladder. The Care Plan dated 7/08/24 detailed the use of a urinary catheter. The Care Plan lacked direction to the staff on changing the urinary catheter per the physician orders. During an interview on 8/20/24 at 7:28 AM Resident #71 reported his catheter had not been changed in at least four weeks. He had brought it to Staff F, License Practical Nurse (LPN) attention, but she no longer worked at the facility. Observation at this time revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to do weekly measurements and assessments on 1 of 2 residents with pressure ulcers (Resident #37). Resident #37 did not receive the weekly assessments between 7/10/24 when he was seen at a wound clinic to 8/20/24 when an assessment was done at the facility. The facility reported a census of 140 residents. Findings include: Staging of a PU/PI is performed to indicate the characteristics and extent of tissue injury, and should be conducted according to professional standards of practice. Determining whether damage to the skin and underlying tissue is a PI or PU depends on the staging of the damaged tissue. See stages below. NOTE: Regardless of the staging system or wound definitions used by the facility, the facility is responsible for completing the MDS utilizing the staging guidelines found in the RAI Manual. Stage 1 Pressure Injury: Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin Intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable erythema…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were smoking in approved areas for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #184). Resident #184 was observed smoking on facility grounds. The facility was a smoke free campus. The facility reported a census of 140 residents. Findings include: Resident #184 did not have a current MDS as she readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Care Plan initiated on 8/8/24, directed staff that this resident used tobacco. The goal was that Resident #184 would adhere to the tobacco/smoking policies of the facility. A Smoking Evaluation was to be done upon admission and as needed. Resident #184 was to be educated on the facility's tobacco / smoking policy(s). On 8/19/24 at 3:34 p.m., Resident #184 wheeled herself down the hall in her wheelchair carrying a pack of cigarettes. Resident #184 stated she does smoke. She said she could smoke whenever she wanted. Resident #184 stated she had asked staff before and they have said they were too busy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, document review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to honor resident choice of meal items for 1 of 1 resident sampled (Resident #113). The facility identified a census of 140 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS identified Resident #113 with a significant weight gain and a diagnosis of lupus, anemia, and end stage renal disease. During an interview on 8/20/24 at 8:49 AM Resident #113 reported she has chosen to eat a vegetarian diet and the staff are not supporting her choice of diet. They served her an Italian club sandwich the other day with meat sauce. Other days they served her a hot dog or a hamburger. She related her physician ordered diet is a low sodium diet, but she has made it clear to the staff that she doesn't want to eat meat as she isn't digesting the meat well. On 8/21/24 at 7:45 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility to follow Physician Orders for one of three residents reviewed (Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 139. Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment Tool, dated 11/16/2023 revealed Resident #10 with no cognitive impairment, relied on staff assistance for transfers from one surface to another and had a history of falls. The resident had diagnoses including closed fractures of the right tibia and left femur, diabetes and congestive heart failure. The Care Plan directed staff to transfer the resident using a Hoyer mechanical lift with two person assistance. The resident admitted to the facility 11/12/2023 from the hospital. The resident's Discharge Instructions included a scheduled follow-up appointment for the resident to see the Orthopedic Physician on Friday, 11/17/2023 at 1:00 p.m. The resident's Progress Notes dated 11/17/2023 failed to reveal staff sent the resident to the scheduled physician visit. On 11/30/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide supervision to keep two of three residents reviewed free from a resident to resident altercation. (Residents #7 and #8). The facility reported a census of 139 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 failed to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating cognitive impairment and ambulated with supervision. The MDS reported the resident had no behaviors during the look back period and had diagnoses including dementia and hypertension. On 11/20/2023 the Care Plan added: observe for the potential that the resident may try to redirect other residents himself and remind him to allow staff to do so. On 11/26/23 the Care Plan documented the resident struck another resident in his room. On 11/29/2023 the Care Plan indicated staff applied a stop sign across resident's door. It also directed staff to redirect other residents away from his room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-02 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to have a properly certified nutrition professional and/or director who met the required qualifications in the time frame allowed. The facility reported a census of 138 residents. Findings Include: A document titled Continuing Education from a local college with a transaction date of 10/30/23 documented Staff H, Food Service Director, was enrolled in a Dietary Manager certification program beginning 1/08/2024. During an interview with Staff H on 10/30/23 at 9:49 AM he indicated he did not have a current Dietary Manager certification, had enrolled in the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) course, and would start his training in January. He stated the Dietician came to the facility one day per week. An interview with the Administrator on 11/2/23 at 8:02 AM confirmed he was aware Staff H did not have a current CDM and was enrolled in the course beginning in January.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to prepare foods under sanitary conditions for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The facility reported a census of 138 residents. Findings Include: 1. The initial kitchen observation on 10/30/23 at 9:24 AM revealed the following: a. The Handwashing sink did not have paper towels, and the sink basin contained a wet wash rag, a wrapper, and a Styrofoam cup. b. The food preparation area lacked filled sanitizer buckets. Food was wiped from surfaces with dry rags. A green food product was noted under breadstick pans placed on the surface after they were cleaned. c. The dishwasher chemical did not read on the test strip. Staff H, Food Service Director, was not able to determine how long the chemical had been missing from the cycle. The temperature gauge read between 148 and 150 degrees. d. Staff I, Cook, wore gloves to fill a water pitcher at the dishwashing sink, lifted a lid and used a utensil to stir food, touched pans of bread, and wiped a food service area without proper hand hygiene. 2. The second…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews and the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan the facility failed to implement a successful QAPI program for six repeated citations. The facility reported a census of 138 residents. Findings Include: 1. Review of the Statements of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction dated 5/6/22, identified the following deficiencies: F550 - Dignity. F698 - Dialysis. F812 - Kitchen Cleanliness F880 - Infection Control. The Plan of Correction reflected the QAPI to monitor for compliance and address addition intervention as indicated. 2. The Statements of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction dated 10/5/22, identified deficiencies as follows: F677 - Activities of Daily Living (ADL). F812 - Kitchen Cleanliness. F880 - Infection Control. The Plan of Correction identified the QAPI team to monitor for compliance. 3. The Statements of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction dated 11/30/22, identified deficiencies as follows: F658 - Professional Standards. F865 - QAPI Program. The Plan of Correction identified the QAPI team to monitor for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide privacy and dignity with dressing (Resident #55) and failed to ensure privacy of a urinary bag by omitting a dignity cover (Resident #4) for 2 out of 5 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility reported a census of 138 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] for Resident #55, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the following active diagnoses: medically complex conditions, Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, Diabetes Mellitus with polyneuropathy, bilateral primary Osteoarthritis of the knee, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and unsteadiness on feet. The MDS revealed Resident #55 required limited assistance of one staff for dressing, personal hygiene, toileting, and transferring. The Care Plan, revised on 9/29/23, identified a focus area for Activities of Daily Living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, resident, family and staff interviews the facility failed to assist a resident to shave and failed to provide appropriate peri-care for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) (Resident #25). The facility identified a census of 138 residents. Findings Include: Resident #25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive loss. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. The MDS documented Resident #25 as frequently incontinence of bowel and bladder. The MDS listed a diagnosis of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. The ADL Care Plan revised 3/15/23 detailed Resident #25 required assistance for ADL's and mobility. The Care Plan lacked intervention or direction to the staff on shaving Resident #25. The Care Plan directed the staff to provide a check and change before and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and observations the facility failed to keep 5 of 5 resident showers free of black substance. The facility reported a census of 152 residents. Findings include: Tour of Station 1, Station 2, and Station 3 shower rooms on 8/7/23 at 2:30 pm with Staff P-Assistant Housekeeping Supervisor revealed the following: a. Station 3-A Hall shower floor noted to have a black substance around the perimeter of the shower floor. Staff P stated it was an ongoing problem but does appear to need re-caulked. b. Station 1 shower room located directly across from room [ROOM NUMBER] noted to have black substance around the perimeter of the shower floor. c. Station 1 shower room located directly across from Room B-10 noted to have black substance around the perimeter of the shower floor. d. Station 2 shower room located directly across from room [ROOM NUMBER] noted to have black substance around the perimeter of the shower floor. e. Station 2 shower room located directly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, observations, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain Individual Narcotic Records which matched documentation in the residents' Medication Administration Records for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #25, #28, #29, #35). The facility reported a census of 152 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #25 revealed the resident had a (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident had intact cognitive ability. A Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an order for Oxycodone 5 milligrams 1 tablet every 6 hours for pain upon discharge from a local hospital. Noted directly under the Oxycodone order was a hand written verbal order by Staff N-RN directing the staff to discontinue the Oxycodone. Review of Resident #25's facility Physician Orders failed to include an order for Oxycodone 5 milligrams as needed for pain.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and observations the facility failed to complete a shift to shift narcotic count to ensure an accurate narcotic medication count. The facility reported a census of 152. Findings include: Observation on 8/9/23 at 10:15 am revealed Staff R-Agency RN counting medications with Staff N-RN on Station 4. Staff R had an incorrect narcotic count for Resident #36. Staff R-RN picked up a pen and signed out the resident's Hydrocodone tablet that she gave at an earlier time that morning. Staff R stated she didn't have time to sign out the narcotic medication earlier when she gave it so she is signing it off now. Observation of the July 2023 Controlled-Drug Count Records sheets for Station 2 revealed the staff failed to count narcotic medications with the on coming/off going staff 31 times from 7/1-7/22/23. Observations of the July 2023 Controlled Drug-Count Records sheets for Station 3-B Hall revealed the staff failed to count narcotic medications with the on coming/off going staff 24 times from 7/1-7/31/23. Observations of the July…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, observations, and policy review the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner. The facility reported a census of 152. Findings include: Observations revealed on 8/16/23 at 11:10 am an August 2023 Cleaning Schedule without any signatures on the form. Staff S-Traveling Dietary Manager admitted things are not getting cleaned as they should, stating we have a lot of work to do in regards to training the staff on cleaning responsibilities. The cleaning schedule assigns the day and evening cooks and dietary aides to tasks they are responsible to clean. During a tour of the main kitchen on 8/16/23 at 11:10 am with Staff S-Travel Dietary Manager revealed a microwave with dried food and dried liquids inside of the microwave and food on the top and sides of the Robo Coupe food processor. During an interview with Staff L-Traveling Administrator on 8/8/23 at 7:30 am, Staff L stated the facility has not had a full time Dietary Manager since mid July. They have utilized Dietary Managers from other Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-08-22 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility document review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to comply with all applicable Federal Regulations regarding Medicare requirements governing billing practices by failing to serve Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) forms 48 hours before the resident ended skilled services for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for liability and appeal notices (Residents #112 and #122). The facility identified a census of 140 residents. Findings include: Review of facility documentation for Resident #112 revealed the resident received Medicare benefits for skilled services 6/10/24 through 6/21/24. The facility failed to provide the required SNF ABN (CMS form 10055), to inform the resident of the potential liability if skilled serves continued, 48 hours prior to skilled services ending. Review of facility documentation for Resident #122 revealed the resident received Medicare benefits for skilled services 4/3/24 through 4/23/24. The facility failed to provide the required SNF ABN (CMS form 10055), to inform the resident of the potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$14,365 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $14,365 — penalty dated 2025-11-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARE INITIATIVES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.7-2.7 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avoca Specialty CareAvoca, IA 1 of 5Correctionville Specialty CareCorrectionville, IA 1 of 5Crestview Specialty CareWest Branch, IA 1 of 5Kingsley Specialty CareKingsley, IA 1 of 5Parkridge Specialty CarePleasant Hill, IA 1 of 5Ravenwood Specialty CareWaterloo, IA 1 of 5Westwood Specialty CareSioux City, IA 2 of 5Chariton Specialty CareChariton, IA 2 of 5Creston Specialty CareCreston, IA 2 of 5Dubuque Specialty CareDubuque, IA 2 of 5Lantern Park Specialty CareCoralville, IA 2 of 5New London Specialty CareNew London, IA 2 of 5Northcrest Specialty CareWaterloo, IA 2 of 5Northern Mahaska Specialty CareOskaloosa, IA 2 of 5Pinnacle Specialty CareCedar Falls, IA 2 of 5Southridge Specialty CareMarshalltown, IA 2 of 5Stratford Specialty CareStratford, IA 3 of 5Atlantic Specialty CareAtlantic, IA 3 of 5Centerville Specialty CareCenterville, IA 3 of 5Cherokee Specialty CareCherokee, IA 3 of 5Eldora Specialty CareEldora, IA 3 of 5Manly Specialty CareManly, IA 3 of 5Montezuma Specialty CareMontezuma, IA 3 of 5Odebolt Specialty CareOdebolt, IA 3 of 5Panora Specialty CarePanora, IA 3 of 5Ridgewood Specialty CareOttumwa, IA 3 of 5Southern Hills Specialty CareOsceola, IA 3 of 5West Ridge Specialty CareKnoxville, IA 4 of 5Bedford Specialty CareBedford, IA 4 of 5Belle Plaine Specialty CareBelle Plaine, IA 4 of 5Corning Specialty CareCorning, IA 4 of 5Corydon Specialty CareCorydon, IA 4 of 5Dunlap Specialty CareDunlap, IA 4 of 5Laporte City Specialty CareLa Porte City, IA 4 of 5Lyon Specialty CareRock Rapids, IA 4 of 5Oakwood Specialty CareAlbia, IA 5 of 5Fonda Specialty CareFonda, IA 5 of 5Lamoni Specialty CareLamoni, IA 5 of 5Mechanicsville Specialty CareMechanicsville, IA 5 of 5Sibley Specialty CareSibley, IA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CARE INITIATIVESOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2009
COMPUTERSHARE CORPORATE TRUST COMPANY, NAOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
CSE CEDAR RAPIDS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/1998
BEAL, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2020
BOWEN, LANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
CAROTHERS, MARY JANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
CHILDS, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2023
CORLESS, PETERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
KREIN, KEITHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/29/2022
RUST, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
STURM, DENISEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
UPMEYER, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/29/2022
DIXON, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2016
DRAKE, EMILYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/04/2023
GILYARD, TANYAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/23/2025
KUHN, JERAMYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/25/2008
MCDYER, JESSICAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/22/2023
VOLM, JOHANNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2021
BAEDKE, CHARISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
GLEASON, MAIVETTEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/15/2025
KERSCHNER, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/04/2025
NGUYEN, THAIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
SWEET-KEECH, RICHARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/08/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 3%Other / private 11%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$306per resident / day
operating cost
$9,306per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$290per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165310. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next