No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lantern Park Specialty Care

2200 Oakdale Road, Coralville, IA 52241 · Non profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (319) 351-8440 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Oct 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$62,595 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $62,595 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-17)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2055 Oakdale Rd · (319) 248-0037 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2751 Heartland Dr · (319) 545-4600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2042 Glen Oaks Dr · (319) 339-7409 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.3%17.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.0%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.3%1.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%4.2%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.8%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.0%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.4%20.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.3%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control34.7%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.8%19.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine73.2%73.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.0%20.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%13.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.871.491.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.782.081.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
31.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 31.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.0%CMS range 36.1–59.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.8–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge31.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified80.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 3.4–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.48
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.52
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
59.4%
Total nursing turnover
90.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 85.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-31)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct accurate Skin assessments, report the development of a pressure ulcer, and notify the Physician of pressure ulcer development for one of three sampled residents with pressure ulcers (Resident #171). This failure to conduct accurate Skin Assessments, report the development of a pressure ulcer, and notify the physician of pressure ulcers resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F686-J; Pressure Ulcers due to the increased likelihood of serious, severe, systemic infection and serious pain. On 05/16/23 at 8:57 PM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ at F686 Pressure Ulcers. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 05/12/23 when an Agency Certified Nurse Aide (CNA 4) reported observing the untreated pressure ulcer and explained reported the finding to a facility CNA (CNA 1), a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN 2), and a Nurse Practitioner (NP 1). The facility provided an acceptable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision with ambulation that resulted in injury for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 85. Findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/15/2024 revealed Resident #4 had no cognitive impairment, transferred to the toilet with partial/moderate supervision and had bladder and bowel incontinence. The MDS indicated the resident had diagnoses including periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthesis left hip (a break in the bone around the joint replacement), pneumonia and anemia. On 2/29/2024 the resident's Care Plan identified the resident had pain related to his periprosthetic fracture of the left hip joint, and had a fall risk. It instructed staff to monitor for unsteady gait, encourage to use call light for assistance, provide a safe environment and wear proper footwear. The Care Plan directed staff to provide assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to ensure the safety for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 83 residents. Findings include The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS list diagnoses including hypertension, non-Alzheimer's dementia and orthostatic hypotension. The Care Plan included a focus area of being at risk for falls dated 1/31/24. Interventions included encouraging proper footwear and monitor for unsteady gait. The Care Plan also included interventions for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) bathing, personal hygiene, toileting, transfers, upper and lower body dressing all requiring assistance of 1 person. The Progress Note written on 4/21/24 documented the resident fell in the shower room, was complaining of pain 8/10 in her right hip and pelvis. Range of Motion (ROM) was completed to all extremities. The right hip was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-05-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to ensure one of five Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) (CNA 2) was competently trained to report changes in one resident's skin immediately (Resident #171) to the Charge Nurse. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) completed a Skin Assessment using basic competencies, including observing all areas of the resident's skin. These failures resulted in the resident experiencing actual harm (delay in treatment to a newly acquired wound.). (Cross Reference F686). The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #171's Clinical Census, located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Census tab, revealed Resident #171 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included lung cancer. Review of Resident #171's Skin Observation Tool, dated 05/15/23, completed by the Director of Nursing (DON), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow Physician Orders when the failed to administer lacosamide, a controlled substance anti-seizure medication, and/or Toradol, a pain medication, as ordered by the Physician for 2 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #170 and #15). Resident #170 had a recent seizure history requiring the use of Keppra (an anti-seizure medication) and lacosamide to control the seizures, and the facility failed to administer four doses of the lacosamide. Resident #15 had been prescribed Toradol to help with an uncontrolled migraine headache, and the facility failed to administer the medication for two days. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #170's Clinical Census, located under the Census tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed Resident #170 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of new onset seizure like activity. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to educate a resident and/or a resident representative and obtain an informed consent prior to two changes in psychotropic medications for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #60) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 86 residents.Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/2/25 for Resident #60 revealed diagnoses list which included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of 15 indicated a severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Care Plan revealed Focus areas to address: a. I feel down or depressed at times. Date initiated: 12/9/24.b. I feel lonely or isolated at times. Date initiated: 3/11/25.c. I have a history of physical or emotional trauma. Date initiated: 3/15/25.d. I use antipsychotic medications related to depression. Date initiated: 4/16/25. A Focus area, dated initiated 3/7/25, addressed I use Duloxetine an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11 dated October 2023 (RAI) review and staff interview the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set for a significant change after a hospice admission for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for hospice. The facility reported a census of 86 residents. Findings include:Review of Physician Orders for Resident #2 revealed Order Details entered on 6/2/25 with the Description: Receiving Hospice services from [provider name redacted] for Alzheimer's dementia effective 4/14/25. Review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11 dated October 2023 (RAI) page 2-17 directed providers, in part .the MDS completion date is no later than the 14th calendar day after determination that significant change in resident's status occurred (determination date + 14 calendar days). Page 2-25 of the RAI directed, in part .an SCSA (Significant Change in Status Assessment) is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual review, and staff interviews the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments in a timely manner for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #49, Resident #51, Resident #84) in the sample. The facility reported a census of 86 residents.Findings include: 1. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed Resident #49 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented a completion date of 2/26/25. Review of the MDS history list indicated a MDS Quarterly assessment completed on 7/18/25. A space of 142 days after the admission assessment. 2. Review of the EHR revealed Resident #51 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission MDS assessment documented a completion date of 1/3/24. Review of the MDS history list indicated MDS Quarterly Assessments completed on 3/7/25, and 7/18/25. A space of 133 days between the assessments. 3. Review of the EHR revealed a Quarterly MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide at least 2 baths per week for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #13 and Resident #61) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 86 residents. Findings include:1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #13 with Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 14 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS assessed Resident #13 required substantial/maximal assistance for showering. Review of the Care Plan, dated 9/27/23 revealed a Focus area to address Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Interventions included, in part: Bathing: I require 1 assist. Date Initiated: 9/27/23. During an interview on 7/28/25 at 11:30 AM, Resident #13 stated she does not get showers very often. Review of Resident #13's Documentation Survey Report V2 for April, May, June and July 2025 revealed the resident was scheduled for a shower twice a week on Tuesday and Friday. Resident #13 documented showers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care devices are on and operational for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #1 and #18) and failed to maintain oxygen tubing in a clean and sanitary manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1) for respiratory care. The facility reported a census of 86.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #18 documented diagnoses of pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease, heart failure, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. The Care Plan (CP) for Resident #18 documented altered respiratory status related to congestive heart failure, the resident experienced frequent shortness of breath, and staff should monitor oxygen at 2-4 liters and ensure sats were at comfort levels (88%-95%). During an interview with Resident #18 on 7/28/25 at 11:01 AM she indicated she had troubles breathing on and off. She pointed at the concentrator in her room and said it wasn't on, then stared at the machine to see if she could tell what number it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide trauma informed care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #60). Resident #60 experienced suicidal ideations that were not addressed in their care plan, staff did not adequately monitor mental health behavior for patterns and medication changes, and staff were not able to articulate resident behavior triggers. The facility reported a census of 86 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #60 dated 7/2/25 documented diagnoses of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. His Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment resulted in a score of 6/15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Care Plan (CP) for Resident #60, with an admission date of 3/7/25, documented focus areas as follows:12/9/24 the resident felt down or depressed at times3/7/25 the resident used duloxetine as an antidepressant3/11/25 the resident felt lonely and isolated at times3/15/25 the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to answer call lights in 15 minutes or less for 3 of 3 observations for call light response. The facility reported a census of 86 residents.Findings include:During an interview on 7/28/25 at 3:20 PM, Resident # 18 explained it takes a long time for staff to answer call lights, over 15 minutes. During an interview on 7/28/25 at 4:06 PM, Resident # 3 explained it takes 35-40 minutes for staff to answer call lights. During an observation on 7/28/25, the call light was observed on for room [ROOM NUMBER] at 3:30 PM. Staff did not enter the resident's room until 4:05 PM. The light was observed on for 35 minutes. During an observation on 7/28/25, the call light was observed on for room [ROOM NUMBER] at 3:40 PM. Staff did not enter the resident's room until 4:10 PM. The light was observed on for 30 minutes. During an observation on 7/31/25, the call light was observed on for room [ROOM NUMBER] at 8:47 AM. Staff did not enter the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for six of ten residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, and Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #3 dated 8/1/24 revealed the resident scored 5 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Review of the resident's October 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed multiple morning medications marked with a code of 9, which indicated other/see progress note. The resident's morning medications not given included Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablet Extended Release 24 hour 25mg (milligrams), with instructions to give 0.5 tablet by mouth once a day for hypertension. Review of Progress Notes for Resident #3 revealed the following: a. 10/8/24 at 10:58 AM authored by Staff A,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical review review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], reviewed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 10/11/24, the facility collected a statement from Resident #2 in which the resident alleged that during the overnight hours of 10/03/24, she had been hit in the head with a back hand, which caused glasses to be knocked off face and fall across the floor near the bathroom. Resident #2 informed that the glasses did not break and upon waking, no one was there. Resident #2 claimed she did not see who allegedly hit her but heard a person call her an exploitive name. Resident #2 reported she had been unable to report the incident until 10/11/24 as she had gotten sick. On 10/11/24, the facility asked 7 current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders when utilizing supplemental oxygen or transcribe verbal order for supplemental oxygen for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for assessment/intervention. The facility additionally failed to administer medications as ordered when multiple morning and afternoon medication doses were omitted on 10/08/24 for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for medication administration. The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #2 example: The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #2 diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and asthma. No shortness of breath or oxygen therapy indicated on MDS assessment. The Care Plan, dated 8/27/24, lacked respiratory focus area for diagnosis of COPD or asthma. The Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide baths for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1) The facility identified a census of 85 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #1 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicates no cognitive impairment. It further indicated diagnoses including: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory failure and anxiety. The MDS indicated Resident #1 required moderate assist from staff for transfers, bathing, dressing and personal hygiene. The care plan with a date initiated of 8/12/24 revealed Resident #1 needed assistance with activities of daily living. The care plan interventions directed staff to provide assistance of one with baths on Monday and Thursday. The facility provided documentation of Resident #1 baths for August 2024 and he only received one bath on 8/29/24. The facility failed to provide documentation of baths in September. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews and observations the facility failed to update residents care plans to reflect their current level of functioning for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 85. Findings include: According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] the resident had diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy, legal blindness, lack of coordination and muscle weakness. The resident required substantial assistance of staff for transfers from the bed to chair, ambulation and had total dependence on staff for toileting needs. The resident utilized a wheelchair to move about the facility. Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated he gave reliable information. Review of the Care Plan dated 1/4/2024, last revised on 3/25/24, indicated the resident will continue to participate in his activities of daily living as his condition allows. The care plan informed the staff the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy, the facility failed to transfer a resident who required a mechanical lift in a safe manner for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 85 residents. Findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/15/2024 indicated Resident #2 had no cognitive impairment, had diagnoses including Cerebrovascular Accident (stroke), hypertension and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). The non-ambulatory resident required total assistance of staff to use the toilet and transfer from one surface to another. The Care Plan revealed the resident had hemiplegia following a cerebral infarct affecting the left, non-dominant side dated 7/31/2024. The resident did not ambulate and required the assistance of one staff to transfer and use the toilet with the use of a sit to stand (E-Z stand) mechanical lift. Communication from therapy to nursing dated 7/30/2024 recommended staff use the E-Z Stand for all transfers, wheel chair for mobility and assistance of one staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility staff failed to treat residents with respect and dignity for 4 out of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #4, #13, #78, and #86). The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for Resident #78 dated 5/2/24, included diagnoses of cancer, hepatitis, and malnutrition. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 15 (intact cognition). On 07/29/24 at 11:49 AM, Resident #78 reported as he walked around in his room. One nurse just got fired for her mistreatment of him. Resident #78 stated when he went to Staff A and asked for his pain medication, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) told him he had cancer that metastasized and he's going to die and there's nothing to do about that. Resident #78 revealed that made him upset and angry. On 7/29/24 at 5:50 PM Staff E, LPN reported Resident #78 walked up to the nurses station…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of new medications and participated in their own treatment plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #41). The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #41 revealed diagnoses of cancer, anxiety, and heart failure. The resident scored 15/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated intact cognition. The resident's Care Plan documented a focus area dated 6/18/24 for poor impulse control related to getting medications or cares at an exact time frame. Interventions included analyze key times, places, circumstances, triggers, that help de-escalate behavior; administer medications as ordered; and document and give as many choices as possible about cares and activities. On 7/30/24 at 9:50 AM during an interview with Resident #41 she stated nurses were messing with her medications and did not tell her what they were for or why they were doing it. She stated it was tough,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0851 — isolated
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Data, schedule review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to submit payroll data for agency staff during the second quarter of the current fiscal year. The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: A document titled PBJ Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year 2024 Quarter 2 (January 1 - March 31) documented the facility triggered for one star staff rating and excessively low weekend staffing. On 7/30/24 at 1:00 PM the Administrator provided staff schedules for the month of March. These documented hours worked by nurses, certified medication aides, and certified nursing aides for three shifts each day and included the name of the on-call staff. The documentation also included both facility and agency staff. During an interview with the Administrator on 7/31/24 at 3:22 PM she stated the PBJ data submitted by the facility did not include agency staff. She acknowledged this impacted the data the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services had for the facility and stated the facility would have to look into it. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to complete an accurate assessment and provide intervention based on that assessment after a fall for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #4) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 83 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS list diagnoses including hypertension, non-Alzheimer's dementia and orthostatic hypotension. The Care Plan included a focus area of being at risk for falls dated 1/31/24. Interventions included encouraging proper footwear and monitor for unsteady gait. The Care Plan also included interventions for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) bathing, personal hygiene, toileting, transfers, upper and lower body dressing all requiring assistance of 1 person. The Progress Note written on 4/21/24 documented the resident fell in the shower room, was complaining of pain 8/10 in her right hip and pelvis. Range of Motion (ROM) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide resident meals under sanitary conditions for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: 1. A dining room observation on 3/18/24 revealed the following: a. At 12:16 PM Staff I, Dietary Aide, accepted a glass from a resident with her right thumb curling over the top of the rim. While she held a cup with her right hand, the dietary aide added a powder substance to the cup from a container in her left hand. Staff I then scratched her left cheek and her nose with the container still in her left hand bringing the container to her face. She did not practice hand hygiene or clean the outside of the container. b. At 12:18 PM Staff I prepared tea for another resident. She touched both sides of the exposed tea bag and held her left thumb inside the cup. She set the cup down and then picked it up with her right palm touching the rim. She handed it to the resident. She did not practice hand hygiene. c. At 12:20 PM Staff I cut a resident's food with his knife…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, narcotic book records, and policy review the facility failed to identify situations as an alleged drug diversion and to report allegations within the required regulatory timeframe for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #18). The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #18 dated 2/15/24 documented diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, epilepsy, and morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation (insufficient breaths per minute). A Care Plan focus area initiated 2/9/23 documented the resident used opioid medications related to chronic pain. A medication card labeled Tramadol HCl 50 milligrams (mg) for Resident #18 observed on 3/20/24 at 2:40 PM revealed 60 tablets were dispensed 6/28/23 and the resident received 1 tablet every 8 hours PRN, (pro re nata, as needed). The first column of 10 medication spaces were empty and the bottom space in the last column was empty. There were 49 tablets left in the medication card. The Medication Administration Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, narcotic book records, and policy review the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of alleged violations, maintain documentation, and prevent further incidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #18). The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #18 dated 2/15/24 documented diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, epilepsy, and morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation (insufficient breaths per minute). A Care Plan focus area initiated 2/9/23 documented the resident used opioid medications related to chronic pain. A medication card labeled Tramadol HCl 50 milligrams (mg) for Resident #18 observed on 3/20/24 at 2:40 PM revealed 60 tablets were dispensed 6/28/23 and the resident received 1 tablet every 8 hours PRN (pro re nata, as needed). The first column of 10 medication spaces were empty and the bottom space in the last column was empty. There were 49 tablets left in the medication card. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, staff interviews, and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide an adequate amount of bathing assistance for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for bathing assistance (Residents #1 and #2). The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 2/5/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included quadriplegia (paralysis in all 4 limbs), neurogenic bladder (a condition which made emptying the bladder difficult), and encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin. The MDS stated the resident required partial/moderate assistance with eating and oral hygiene, and was dependent on staff for toilet use, showering, and dressing. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. A 1/31/24 Care Plan entry stated the resident required the assistance of 1-2 staff with bathing on Tuesday and Friday. The Documentation Survey Report V2 for February 2024 documented the following: Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out wound treatment orders for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for wounds (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Stage III Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed. Slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. May include undermining and tunneling. Stage IV is full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff emptied a urinary catheter (a drainage system which emptied urine from the bladder into a drainage bag via a tube) in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with catheter (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) assessment tool, dated 2/5/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included quadriplegia (paralysis in all 4 limbs), neurogenic bladder (a disorder which made urination difficult), and encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin. The MDS stated the resident required partial/moderate assistance with eating and oral hygiene, and was dependent of staff for toilet use, showering, and dressing. The MDS stated the resident had an indwelling catheter and listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. A 2/2/24 Care Plan entry stated the resident had a suprapubic catheter (a catheter in which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to have safeguards in place to protect and account for pro re nata (PRN, as needed) medications for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #5 and Resident #18). The facility reported a census of 84. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #18 dated 2/15/24 documented diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, epilepsy, and morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation (insufficient breaths per minute). A Care Plan focus area initiated 2/9/23 documented the resident used opioid medications related to chronic pain. A medication card labeled Tramadol HCl 50 milligrams (mg) for Resident #18 observed on 3/20/24 at 2:40 PM revealed 60 tablets were dispensed 6/28/23 and the resident received 1 tablet every 8 hours as needed (PRN). The first column of 10 medication spaces were empty and the bottom space in the last column was empty. There were 49 tablets left in the medication card. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #18 revealed he received Tramadol HCl 50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner for 82 out of 82 residents. Specifically, food items in the kitchen and storage areas were unlabeled or expired, dietary equipment had a white residue and Dietary Staff were seen in the kitchen not wearing appropriate hair coverings. The facility reoprted a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: 1. The initial kitchen inspection was conducted on 05/15/23 at 09:13 AM through 10:00 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM). The following concerns were noted: a. In the Dry Storage area, an opened bag of corn flakes, removed from the manufacturer's packaging was observed to be dated 04/22/23, which the DM stated was the opened date. There was no use by date. The DM stated that They [staff] know when to discard the food item by the manufacturer's expiration date. Further interview with the DM confirmed there was no longer any packaging on the item to show an expiration date. b. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to act on a Pharmacy recommendation for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #44). The facility failed to act on the Consultant Pharmacist's recommendation that Resident #44, who was prescribed an antianxiety medication (Lorazepam), received a gradual dose reduction. The failure to act on this recommendation had the potential for the resident to experience adverse medication effects such as impaired memory, judgement, and an increased risk of falls. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: Review of Resident #44's admission Record, located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder and difficulty walking. Review of Resident #44's EMR Physician Orders located under the Orders tab dated 06/08/22 indicated the medical provider order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy and procedure addressed feedback; data collection systems; the development, monitoring, and evaluation of performance indicators; or corrective actions. This failure had the potential to affect all 82 residents who currently lived in the facility. Findings Include: A review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, dated 03/2020, indicated the facility's QAPI policy and procedure failed to: a. Describe how it obtained and used feedback from residents, representatives, and staff to identify high-risk, high-volume, or problem prone issues. b. Describe how the committee would ensure data was collected, used, and monitored. c. Describe procedures for the development, monitoring, and evaluation of performance indicators. d. Describe how corrective measures and preventative actions would be implemented. On 05/18/23 at 1:24 PM, the Administrator and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) for recording incidents of infections identified under the facility's IPCP, surveillance, tracking and trending, and the corrective actions taken by the facility. As part of this failure, the facility did not have an effective Antibiotic Stewardship Program, which had the potential to affect all residents of the facility (Cross Reference F881). In addition, the facility failed to have an adequate water management program. The facility's water management program was incomplete and was not consistent with current ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers) Guideline, which specifically called for design and maintenance procedures for the potential exposure of Legionnaire's disease (a serious pneumonia infection) within a healthcare facility. This failure created a potential for the 76 facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, facility document review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that included a functional Antibiotic Stewardship Program. The failure to have a system in place that monitors antibiotic use in accordance with established protocols has the potential to affect all 82 residents of the facility. Findings Include: Review of a policy provided by the facility titled Antibiotic Stewardship dated 04/2018 revealed, This protocol will meet the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] elements of Antibiotic Stewardship and will be followed by all Care Initiatives Employee. Review infections criteria based off the McGeer's criteria to determine actual infection or not actual .Review days of antibiotic therapy use .Monitor for patterns in facility .UTI [urinary tract infection] in resident WITHOUT catheter .MUST HAVE BOTH CRITERIA 1 and 2 .Criteria 1. MUST HAVE at least 1 of the following.Acute dysuria or acute pain, swelling.AND at least 1 of the following .Acute costovertebral angle pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure six residents (Residents #12, #21, #27, #30, #53, and #124) were afforded privacy out of a sample of 35 residents. The facility failed to protect these six residents' medical diagnoses from non-clinical facility staff, and potential public consumers, by placing the residents' names and mental health diagnoses in the Facility Assessment. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: During review of the admission Records for residents, the following concerns noted: a. Review of Resident #12's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. b. Review of Resident #21's admission Record, located under the Profile tab in the EMR, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. c. Review of Resident #27's admission Record, located under the Profile tab in the EMR,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs for three of three narcotic storage lock boxes observed. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: On 05/18/23 at 10:52 AM, the small medication refrigerator in the medication room was observed with the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON). Three small lock boxes, which were not permanently affixed to the refrigerator, were noted in the refrigerator. The IDON confirmed the boxes were for storage of narcotic medications and that the boxes were not permanently affixed to the refrigerator. Upon further review of the narcotic medication storage boxes the following noted: a. On 05/18/23 at 10:55 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 unlocked the lock box for halls 100 and 200. LPN 2 confirmed the unaffixed box contained a bottle holding 24 milliliters (ml) of 2 milligram (mg)/ml lorazepam, a Schedule IV controlled medication. b. On 05/18/23 at 10:56 AM, LPN 1 unlocked the lock box for halls 300 and 400.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-18 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure five Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) of five random CNA's reviewed for staffing were trained in the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program (CNA 2, CNA 5, CNA 6, CNA 7, and CNA 8). The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: Review of documents provided by the facility titled Relias [an on-line training program] revealed the following: 1. CNA 2's date of hire was 11/03/06 and his training failed to address the facility's QAPI program. 2. CNA 5's date of hire was 07/20/18 and her training failed to address the facility's QAPI program. 3. CNA 6's date of hire was 01/03/17 and her training failed to address the facility's QAPI program. 4. CNA 7's date of hire was 05/25/12 and her training failed to address the facility's QAPI program. 5. CNA 8's date of hire was 03/26/07 and her training failed to address the facility's QAPI program. During an interview on 05/18/23 at 10:35 AM, the Administrator confirmed the staff were not yet trained on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that residents and/or their representatives received written information about and assistance with formulating Advance Directives for three of three sampled residents reviewed for Advance Directives (Resident #14, #51, and #52). The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #14's Clinical Census, located under the Census tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included debility, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #14's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/03/23 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed Resident #14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #14's Evaluation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure written notice was sent to the resident and/or the resident's representatives after emergent transfers from the facility to the hospital for two residents who were reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents #69 and #67). The failure to provide the required written notices, containing all required information, places the residents at risk of involuntary transfer, and/or not being informed of their rights, including how to appeal, their transfer. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #69's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an admission Record, which indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #69's Nursing Progress Notes, located under the Prog (Progress) Notes tab in the EMR and dated 03/27/23, indicated the resident sustained a change in his condition and was sent to a local hospital. Review of the Progress Notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one out of a survey sample of 35 residents (Resident #20) received services to maintain or improve the resident's activities of daily living related to mobility. Resident #20 was not provided restorative services, as directed by Skilled Therapy for a walk-to-dine program. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: Review of Resident #20's admission Record in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with muscle weakness. Review of Resident #20's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/07/23, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 which revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated the resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. The assessment revealed the resident was to walk in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, family member and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide activities designed to meet the individualized needs for one of two residents reviewed for activities out of 35 sampled residents (Resident #50). Specifically, the facility failed to provide a resident with dementia with consistent, resident-appropriate Activities Program to enhance her quality of life. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: Review of Resident #50's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated Resident #50 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, without behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #50's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/02/23 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, which indicated Resident #50 was unable to complete the interview. The staff assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents reviewed for accident hazards received adequate assistance and supervision to prevent injuries (Resident #37). Resident #37 required assistance from staff to be fed. On 05/09/23 the resident attempted to feed herself, spilled hot food on her right chest, and sustained a first-degree burn on her chest. After this accident, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive root cause analysis which contained all components per facility policy. The facility also failed to implement measures identified to prevent further accidents, including an Occupational Therapy assessment and the need for total dependence on staff for feeding to reduce the chance of another potential injury. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's admission Record, located under the Profile tab in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), indicated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility document review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure three Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) of five reviewed were provided Annual Performance Reviews (CNA #2, CNA #8, and CNA #5). This failure has the potential for decreased quality of life or quality of care for the residents. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: 1. Review of a document provided by the facility titled Annual Review, signed as dated 11/22/21, indicated CNA #2 completed an Annual Review at that time. 2. Review of a document provided by the facility titled Annual Review, signed as dated 03/28/22, indicated CNA #8 completed an Annual Review at that time. 3. Review of a document provided by the facility titled Annual Review, signed as dated 11/07/21, indicated CNA #5 completed an Annual Review at that time. During an interview on 05/18/23 at 9:04 AM, the Administrator and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) confirmed there were no more recent Annual Performance Reviews completed for CNA #2, CNA #8, and CNA #5. The Administrator stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to act on a Pharmacy Recommendation for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #44). The facility failed to act on the Consultant Pharmacist's recommendation that Resident #44, who was prescribed an antianxiety medication (Lorazepam), received a gradual dose reduction. The failure to act on this recommendation had the potential for the resident to experience adverse medication effects such as impaired memory, judgement, and an increased risk of falls. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: Review of Resident #44's admission Record, located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder and difficulty walking. Review of Resident #44's EMR Physician Orders located under the Orders tab dated 06/08/22 indicated the medical provider order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for one of five sampled residents observed receiving medications (Resident #170. There were two errors in 30 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 6.67%. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: Review of Resident #170's Clinical Census, located under the Census tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed Resident #170 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included seizure like activity and dermatosis. On 05/16/23 at 9:22 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)2 was observed preparing medications for Resident #170. LPN 2 stated Resident #170 did not have two medications available that he was supposed to receive. Review of Resident #170's Physician Orders for medications, listed under the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed Resident #170 was to receive medications including: a. Lacosamide (an anti-seizure medication)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-08-01 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) review, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to complete an updated PASRR evaluation for a resident with a new diagnosis for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #13). The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: The MDS for Resident #13 revealed diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, psychotic disorder, PTSD, and delirium due to known physiological condition. The resident scored 10/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The resident's Care Plan, with an admission date of 7/9/21, documented focus areas and interventions for PASRR, post traumatic stress disorder, behaviors and paranoia, cognitive function and decision making, hallucinations, and depression. The PASRR focus area indicated, on 7/9/21, the assessment was completed prior to admission to the facility. The PASRR Outcome, dated 7/7/21 indicated no Level II was required based on diagnoses of major depression, anxiety disorder, and panic disorder. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-05-18 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct and document a comprehensive facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during day-to-day operations. The lack of an adequate Facility Assessment had the potential for residents' needs to go unmet and/or result in a lack of services provided by the facility to competently care for 82 residents who resided at the facility at the time of the survey. Findings Include: A review of the Facility Assessment, updated 03/27/23, indicated the Facility Assessment failed to address the following pertinent characteristics affecting day-to-day operations and potential emergency situations: a. A facility-based and community-based all hazards approach Risk Assessment. b. Staffing requirements based on resident acuity levels. c. An evaluation of the training program, including the specialized training and competencies of the staff who worked in the facility, such as an Infection Control Preventionist and/or other clinical specialties/services routinely provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$62,595 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $62,595 — penalty dated 2024-09-17
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-17 for 14 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARE INITIATIVES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.7-1.7 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avoca Specialty CareAvoca, IA 1 of 5Correctionville Specialty CareCorrectionville, IA 1 of 5Crestview Specialty CareWest Branch, IA 1 of 5Heritage Specialty CareCedar Rapids, IA 1 of 5Kingsley Specialty CareKingsley, IA 1 of 5Parkridge Specialty CarePleasant Hill, IA 1 of 5Ravenwood Specialty CareWaterloo, IA 1 of 5Westwood Specialty CareSioux City, IA 2 of 5Chariton Specialty CareChariton, IA 2 of 5Creston Specialty CareCreston, IA 2 of 5Dubuque Specialty CareDubuque, IA 2 of 5New London Specialty CareNew London, IA 2 of 5Northcrest Specialty CareWaterloo, IA 2 of 5Northern Mahaska Specialty CareOskaloosa, IA 2 of 5Pinnacle Specialty CareCedar Falls, IA 2 of 5Southridge Specialty CareMarshalltown, IA 2 of 5Stratford Specialty CareStratford, IA 3 of 5Atlantic Specialty CareAtlantic, IA 3 of 5Centerville Specialty CareCenterville, IA 3 of 5Cherokee Specialty CareCherokee, IA 3 of 5Eldora Specialty CareEldora, IA 3 of 5Manly Specialty CareManly, IA 3 of 5Montezuma Specialty CareMontezuma, IA 3 of 5Odebolt Specialty CareOdebolt, IA 3 of 5Panora Specialty CarePanora, IA 3 of 5Ridgewood Specialty CareOttumwa, IA 3 of 5Southern Hills Specialty CareOsceola, IA 3 of 5West Ridge Specialty CareKnoxville, IA 4 of 5Bedford Specialty CareBedford, IA 4 of 5Belle Plaine Specialty CareBelle Plaine, IA 4 of 5Corning Specialty CareCorning, IA 4 of 5Corydon Specialty CareCorydon, IA 4 of 5Dunlap Specialty CareDunlap, IA 4 of 5Laporte City Specialty CareLa Porte City, IA 4 of 5Lyon Specialty CareRock Rapids, IA 4 of 5Oakwood Specialty CareAlbia, IA 5 of 5Fonda Specialty CareFonda, IA 5 of 5Lamoni Specialty CareLamoni, IA 5 of 5Mechanicsville Specialty CareMechanicsville, IA 5 of 5Sibley Specialty CareSibley, IA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CARE INITIATIVESOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2014
COMPUTERSHARE CORPORATE TRUST COMPANY, NAOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
BEAL, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2020
BOWEN, LANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
CAROTHERS, MARY JANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
CHILDS, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2023
CORLESS, PETERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
KREIN, KEITHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/29/2022
RUST, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
STURM, DENISEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
UPMEYER, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/29/2022
DIXON, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2016
DRAKE, EMILYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/04/2023
GILYARD, TANYAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/23/2025
KUHN, JERAMYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/25/2008
MCDYER, JESSICAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/22/2023
VOLM, JOHANNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2021
BAEDKE, CHARISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
EBERLY, SCOTTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
MCCOMAS, EMILYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$950K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 9%Other / private 38%

This home reported $950K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$297per resident / day
operating cost
$9,028per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$324per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165214. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next