Correctionville Specialty Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 39 beds and averages 34.5 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, law enforcement incident review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to keep residents safe from sexual abuse and financial exploitation for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1). Resident #1 reported a male Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) forced her to perform sexual acts on him. In addition, that male CNA and another CNA transferred money from her account using an electronic money transferring service. Despite the allegation of sexual abuse from the male CNA to Resident #1, the facility failed to prevent him from working with other vulnerable residents in the corporation. Findings include: The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of 10/23/23 on 11/9/23 at 4:00 PM. The facility removed the IJ and decreased the scope to a D on 11/13/23 with the following actions: a. The facility provided the following education: i. Dependent adult abuse and sexual abuse including consensual vs. non-consensual education and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, staff, and resident interviews, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse within 2 hours for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Resident #1 reported to staff on 10/23/23 that a staff member sexually abused her, in addition to transferring money from her account to staff. The facility did not report the incident to the appropriate authorities until the evening of 10/24/23. Findings include: The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of 10/23/23 on 11/9/23 at 4:00 PM. The facility removed the IJ and decreased the scope to a D on 11/13/23 with the following actions: a. The facility provided the following education: i. Dependent adult abuse and sexual abuse including consensual vs. non-consensual education and the need to immediately report the allegation on 11/10/23. ii. Spotting Signs of Elder Abuse to include caretaker boundaries on 11/10/23. iii. The facility's expectations regarding purchasing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with residents, staff and law enforcement, record review and policy review the facility failed to adequately investigate allegations of abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). After Resident #1 reported allegations of sexual and financial abuse, the administration only addressed the exchange of money but minimized and failed to fully investigate the allegations of sexual abuse. Findings include: The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of 10/23/23 on 11/9/23 at 4:00 PM. The facility removed the IJ and decreased the scope to a D on 11/13/23 with the following actions: a. The facility provided the following education: i. Dependent adult abuse and sexual abuse including consensual vs. non-consensual education and the need to immediately report the allegation on 11/10/23. ii. Spotting Signs of Elder Abuse to include caretaker boundaries on 11/10/23. iii. The facility's expectations regarding purchasing personal items for residents on 11/10/23.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-20 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews with staff and residents and policy review the facility failed to meet a resident's needs related to adequately planned transfers for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility discharged Resident #1 abruptly after allegations of abuse to a homeless shelter that did not know of her transfer. The homeless shelter did not have nurses on staff to meet her medical needs and they did not have any staff overnight. The homeless shelter transferred Resident #1 to the hospital as she could not safely remain in the homeless shelter. After arriving to the homeless shelter, Resident #1 began to stumble and fall. Findings include: The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of 10/23/23 on 11/9/23 at 4:00 PM. The facility removed the IJ and decreased the scope to a D on 11/13/23 with the following actions: a. The facility provided the following education: i. Dependent adult abuse and sexual abuse including consensual vs.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility policy review, resident, and staff interview the facility failed to assure that the alarm system worked properly to alert the staff to residents leaving the facility unattended for 3 of 6 reviews (Residents #1, #2, and #3). On 8/11/23 in the night, an on-duty staff member discovered Resident #1 in his wheelchair near Highway 20. The facility staff did not know that he left the building, that the alarms did not go off, and they thought that he went to bed. The survey determined that the staff failed to respond to door alarms, while 2 of 6 Wander Guard (WG) alarms did not work at the time of survey. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation to the health, safety, and security of the resident. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of August 11, 2023, on August 16, 2023 at 5:33 PM. The Facility Staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on August 16, 2023 with the following actions: a. Staff were educated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-11-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and policy review the facility failed to prevent retribution to a resident and a staff member for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1). Resident #1 reported that a male Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) sexually abused her. After the facility learned of the allegations on 10/24/23, they discharged Resident #1 to a homeless shelter on 10/25/23 with only approximately 30 minutes to pack. In addition, Staff P reported that the facility suspended her after she confronted the Administrator regarding the need to report the abuse. The facility suspended Staff Q from work for not reporting abuse within 2 hours after she learned about the allegation. At the time she reported the allegation, the facility already knew from other staff. The facility asked her to share information related to the abuse to speed up their investigation so she could return to work sooner. Due to the facility's treatment of Resident #1 after the facility learned of the allegation of abuse, caused Resident #1 to become afraid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-10-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to adequately monitor residents that had a high-risk for pressure ulcers for one of two residents reviewed (Resident #16). Resident #16 had a facility-acquired pressure on the bottom of his foot that was not discovered or documented until it measured over 7 centimeters in total area and was blackened. Despite Resident #16 receiving a bath the day before the discovery of the unstageable pressure wound, the staff denied knowledge of the wound. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only, it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility record review, resident and resident family interviews, staff interviews and facility policy the facility failed to appropriately implement interventions to protect 4 out of 4 residents (Resident #3, #4, #6 & #8) reviewed from abuse. The facility reported a census of 35 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented diagnoses of depression, anxiety disorder and heart failure. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of the facility provided Incident Report dated 4/10/26 at 1:00 p.m., revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported that while giving the resident a bath the resident stated, I was eating in the living room but today I moved back to the dining room. She was asked why by the CNA. The resident responded I am afraid male resident is going to grope me. CNA verified the male resident. Resident continued to state last night…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Iowa Department of Inspections & Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) within 2 hours of an allegation of abuse for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #3 & #6). The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #6 documented diagnoses of hypertension, muscle weakness and depression. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Interview on 5/5/26 at 10:44 a.m., with Resident #6 revealed she was sleeping in bed unclothed when that old man (Resident #7) came into her room. Resident #6 revealed he was sitting next to her bed and she asked him what he was doing and he leaned over and kissed her around her mouth area. Resident #6 again asked him what he was doing and he said come on and he kissed her again on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to revise and update care plans to include appropriate interventions for residents to prevent repeated falls and resident to resident altercations for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1 and #4). The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, symptoms of and signs with cognitive functions and awareness, and history of falling. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview on 5/5/26 at 11:16 AM, Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN) recalled a fall involving Resident #1 in April 2026. The RN remembered the resident attempted to walk from the bathroom to his wheelchair when he fell by the wheelchair. When asked about documenting the fall details, the nurse reported she hoped she performed them and thought she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who experienced a fall received the necessary care and services to maintain their highest practicable physical well-being. For 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1), nursing staff failed to conduct a thorough assessment, implement immediate interventions, perform required neurological checks, or notify the resident's physician and family following an unwitnessed fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1).Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, symptoms of and signs with cognitive functions and awareness, and history of falling. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. During the interview on 5/4/26 at 3:40 PM, Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated she found Resident #1 on the floor near the wheelchair upon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to ensure each resident's individual safety while using the commode for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #2 documented diagnoses of dementia, anxiety disorder, and repeated falls. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated no cognitive impairment. The Care Plan for Resident #2 indicated a risk for falls due to increased restlessness and anxiety. Resident #2 was documented as non-ambulatory and required assistance with a stand lift, though the resident expressed a preference for using the commode. During an interview on 5/5/26 at 11:05 AM, Resident #2's roommate recalled an incident on the night before Easter when Resident #2 waited on the commode around bedtime. The roommate noted that Resident #2 did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide and maintain accurate resident records to reflect incidents that occurred in the facility for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #1 and #6). The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, symptoms of and signs with cognitive functions and awareness, and history of falling. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. During the interview on 5/4/26 at 3:40 PM, Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated she found Resident #1 on the floor near the wheelchair upon entering the room. Resident #1 reported losing his footing and falling while walking from the bathroom to his wheelchair. Staff A reported the incident occurred between 7:00 and 7:15 AM on the second or third Sunday of April 2025, before Resident #1 ate breakfast and attended…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature to 3 of 5 residents (Residents #3, #9, and #12) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 35 residents.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Interview 12/29/2025 at 10:56 AM with Resident #9 revealed that the food is not always hot when it is delivered on the meal tray. 2. Review of Resident #12's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Interview 12/29/2025 at 1:00 PM with Resident #12 revealed that food is absolute garbage at the facility, and is always cold. Continuous observation 12/30/25 from 11:19 AM until 12:14 PM dining service was completed in the dining room. Pre-temp meal temperature on the food items in the steam table revealed gravy was 161 degrees, mashed potatoes were 170.9 degrees, spinach…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical document review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide a comprehensive care plan related to oxygen use for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #9) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 35 residents.Findings include: Review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further revealed diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), renal insufficiency, and anxiety disorder. Review of a facility provided document titled, Order Summary Report with a date of 12/17/25 revealed a physician's order with a start date of 11/13/25 for oxygen continuously at 2 liters to keep oxygen saturation above 90% every shift for shortness of breath, and hypoxemia (a medical condition with abnormally low oxygen levels in the blood). Review of Resident #9's Care Plan with a revision date of 11/13/25 revealed no focus, goals, or interventions for oxygen utilization.Interview 12/30/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide thorough and timely assessment and intervention for 1 of 16 residents reviewed. Resident #24 was diagnosed with Covid-19 and was admitted to the hospital with pneumonia. The resident returned to the facility on 11/25 and the staff failed to assess the resident's Vital Signs (VS; heart rate, oxygen saturation, blood pressure and respirations) until 12/4/25 when she was found to have a change in condition, including low blood pressures. The resident was sent back to the hospital on [DATE]. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (intact cognitive ability.) Resident #24 required substantial assistance with sit to stand transfers, and was totally dependent on staff for dressing, toileting and showering. The resident was on oxygen therapy as needed. Her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide a professional standard of quality of care by not completing catheter cares for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include:Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicating normal cognition. The document provided resident diagnoses of Post polio syndrome, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and Raynaud's Syndrome. The document disclosed the resident had an indwelling catheter and ostomy.Resident #3's Care Plan dated 12/18/25 revealed a focus of urinary catheter suprapubic 16fr with 10cc bulb initiated 12/16/24 and revised 6/9/25. Interventions dated 12/16/24 and 4/11/25 included monitoring kinks, encouraging fluids, enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) An additional focus area identified risk for urinary tract infection (UTI) related to suprapubic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$60,316 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $28,677 — penalty dated 2023-10-19
• $31,639 — penalty dated 2023-08-24
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-17 for 55 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARE INITIATIVES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $309K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA