No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avoca Specialty Care

610 East York Street, Avoca, IA 51521 · Non profit - Corporation · 46 certified beds · (712) 343-6398 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (712) 343-6398 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Mar 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
510 N Elm St · (712) 343-6455 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
102 N Elm St · (712) 343-6777 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
212 W Wood St · (712) 343-2352 · Call to confirm hours
Park
west st · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.0%17.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.2%1.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.6%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.0%4.2%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.8%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.8%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.6%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.3%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.2%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table30.6%19.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.5%73.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.3%20.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.3%13.2%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.2%CMS range 27.4–57.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.0–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.99
RN hours/ resident / day
0.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.01
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.78
RN hoursweekends
63.9%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 33.4 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.13 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

68 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to monitor and prevent the worsening of pressure sores for 1 of 2 residents. Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE] with a chronic skin issue on his left heel. It wasn't identified or documented until 6/20 and staff failed to get an order for treatment until 8/3. He also had an open sore on his right foot that had not been identified or documented until 8/3. The facility also failed to implement preventative interventions to facilitate healing. The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to identify non-pharmacological interventions and targeted behaviors related to high risk medications for 5 of 5 sampled residents reviewed (Resident #4, #8, #25, #23, and #33). The facility reported a census of 33 residents.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognitive functioning. The MDS further revealed Resident #4 utilized antipsychotic, and antidepressant medication during the seven day look back period. Review of Resident #4's Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) page titled, Clinical Physician Orders revealed an order for antianxiety medication with no antipsychotic medication listed. Further review of the Clinical Physician Orders revealed an order for Buspirone HCL oral tablet 10 MG (Antianxiety medication). Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning. The Clinical Physician Orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included problems, goals, or interventions for 4 of 6 Residents (Resident #4, #25, #23, and #33) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 33. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed an admission to the facility from a short-term general hospital stay on 1/9/26. The MDS further revealed diagnoses of anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of the Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) page titled, Clinical Physician Orders revealed an order with a start date of 2/10/26 for Buspirone HCL oral tablet (antianxiety). Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning. Review of Resident #4's Care Plan with a revision date of 1/20/26 revealed no documentation of antianxiety medication. 2. Review of Resident #25's MDS dated [DATE] revealed an admission to the facility from a skilled nursing facility on 10/26/23. The MDS further revealed Resident #25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review, clinical record review, resident interview, family interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide nursing staff to assure residents safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner and not responding to a request for toileting in a timely manner for 3 of 16 resident reviewed (Resident #10, #33, and #34). The facility reported a census of 33 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #10 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 3/4/26 at 2:02 PM Resident #10 stated during the resident council meeting that call lights took longer than 15 minutes to be answered. Resident #10 explained there was only 1 Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) last night on the pm shift. Resident #10 stated it took longer than 30 minutes last night for his call light to be answered. 2. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #33 documented a BIMS of 12 indicating moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to verify the resident's advanced directive choice documented accurately for 1(Resident #7) of 16 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include:Resident #7's Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Order Declaration Form, signed by the resident [DATE] and signed by the physician [DATE], documented DNR. The Clinical Resident Profile, in the electronic health record (EHR), for Resident #7, dated [DATE], revealed a code status of CPR. The Clinical Physician Orders form for Resident #7, dated [DATE], documented a physician's order, revision date of [DATE], for CPR. Interview on [DATE] at 2:12 PM, Staff C, Registered Nurse stated in the event of an emergency with a resident she would check for the resident's advanced directive choice in the resident's electronic health record. Staff C stated she was not aware if the facility had an Advanced Directives book…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the residents with a comfortable / clean homelike environment by not changing soiled sheets for 1 for 20 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 3/3/26 at 9:16 AM Resident #3 stated he had bled on his sheets after he fell on 2/28/26. Resident #3 explained the sheets on his bed had not been changed since the bleeding had occurred. On 3/3/26 at 9:15 AM an observation of three 50 cent sized circular areas of dry red colored fluid.On 3/3/26 11:56 AM Staff F, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) stated the CNA's change the bedding usually on the first bath day of the week for that resident. Staff F stated Resident #3 was on the list but had not had a bath yet. Staff F explained she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to represent an accurate picture of the resident's status during the observation period of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #25, #5, #33) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 utilized antipsychotic medication during the look back period. Review of the Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) page titled, Clinical Physician's Orders revealed no orders for antipsychotic medications. 2. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #5 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further documented placement of an indwelling catheter. On 3/3/26 at 8:31 AM Resident #5 stated he had never had a catheter. On 3/3/26 at 1:34 PM Resident #5's son stated his dad was at the hospital for a severe bladder infection. Resident #5 stated his dad…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to Incorporate the recommendations from the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into a resident's care plan for 1 (Resident #13) of 3 resident reviewed. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident #13, dated 2/6/26, included diagnoses of schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, and depression. Resident #13's Notice of PASRR Level II Outcome, dated 1/21/26, revealed the resident required specialized services for ongoing psychiatric medication management by a psychiatrist and rehabilitative services of supportive counseling. Resident #13's Care Plan, with a target date of 5/7/26, lacked documentation of PASRR specialized services. Interview on 3/4/26 at 4:00 PM, the Director of Nursing stated the expectation for specialized services to be included in the resident's care plan. Facility Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans Policy, revised December 2016, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to revise and implement care plans for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #4) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 utilized antipsychotic medications during the seven day look back period. Review of Resident #4's Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) page titled, Clinical Physician Orders revealed order for antianxiety medication with no antipsychotic medication listed. Further review of the Clinical Physician Orders revealed an order for Buspirone HCL oral tablet 10 MG (Antianxiety medication). Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning. There was no antipsychotic medication listed. Review of Resident #4's Care Plan with a revision date of 1/20/26 revealed #4 was utilizing antipsychotic medications. The Care Plan further revealed that antianxiety medications were not listed. Interview on 3/3/26 at 3:47 PM with the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, prescription package insert review, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to meet professional standards of care when administering insulin to one (Resident #24) of one residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #24, dated 12/12/25 included a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and documented the resident received insulin. Observation on 3/4/26 at 11:25 AM, Staff A, MDS Coordinator drew up 4 units of Novolog Aspart insulin, from a multi-use vial (bottle) of insulin, into a syringe and administered the insulin by injection to Resident #24. The vial was labeled with an open date of 1/19/26. Interview on 3/4/26, the MDS Coordinator stated she thought the insulin was good for 30 days, maybe 90 days. Package Insert/Prescribing Information for Insulin Aspart Injection, updated 3/10/25, revealed multi-dose vial storage date of 28 days after opened. Facility Insulin Administration Policy, revised September 2014, revealed in steps in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received showers to maintain good personal hygiene for 2 (Residents #7 and #34) of 3 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #7, dated 12/26/25, indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating mild cognitive impairment. Interview on 3/2/26 at 12:57 PM, Resident #7 revealed that she does not get baths twice a week. Resident #7 further stated she would like to have her baths twice a week, but there is only one bath aide at the facility and she can't get to every bath during her shift. Review of Resident #7's clinical record task form for showers, dated 3/3/26, for a 30 day period from 2/4/26 - 3/3/25, showers were documented as completed for 5 days: 2/5, 2/7, 2/11, 2/18, and 2/25. The task form documented the resident was to receive a shower on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 57 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide respiratory services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #34) who required the use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine. The facility failed to have an order for the CPAP and failed to clean the CPAP. The facility reported a census of 33 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #34 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #34 had a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea.On 3/2/26 at 3:38 PM Resident #34 stated he had not had his CPAP machine or mask cleaned by the staff since admission to the facility. Review of Resident #34's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented no physician's order for use of a CPAP machine or any orders to clean Resident #34's CPAP machine / mask.On 3/4/26 at 4:21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when providing care to a resident with a catheter for 1 of 3 reviewed (Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 33 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #10 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented utilization of an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #10's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) documented a physician's order to cleanse suprapubic catheter sites with soap, rinse/dry thoroughly. Apply 4x4 or drain sponge every shift. On 3/4/26 at 10:19 AM an observation of catheter cares and transfer of Resident #10 revealed Staff H, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) and Staff G, CNA / Certified Medication Assistant (CMA) completed hand hygiene. Staff G applied gloves, cleansed abdomen with peri wipe, cleansed catheter tubing down…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide services meeting professional standards for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2). The facility failed to follow physician orders for completion of labs. The facility had a census of 31. Findings include:Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The document provided the resident had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, hypertension (HTN) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with unspecified complications. The MDS disclosed the resident received 7 days of insulin injections with 2 days of orders for change of insulin orders during the reporting period. The Care Plan dated 6/20/25 contained a focus area for Diabetes Mellitus initiated 4/6/24. Interventions for staff included medications as ordered by physician, monitoring for and documenting side effects and effectiveness (4/6/24), monitor for side effects (4/6/24) and provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide bathing assistance for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for bathing (Residents #1 and #2). The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS identified bathing activity for Resident #1 was not applicable/not attempted. Resident #1's MDS included diagnoses of cancer, anemia, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure (heart does not pump blood well), and end stage renal disease (kidney). The Clinical Census documented Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 6/4/25. The Care Plan with a target date of 6/12/25 identified Resident #1 required assistance of 1 staff member to provide bathing. Review of Point of Care (POC) Tasks in the electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, resident council notes, grievances, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received baths twice a week or per their requested amount a week for 6 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #2, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8). The facility also failed to offer toileting assistance for 2 of 4 resident reviewed (Resident #5 and #8). The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 3/21/2025, documented Resident #2 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS documented she required partial/moderate assistance for toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, personal hygiene and toilet transferring. In the bathing section not applicable was documented. The following diagnoses were documented for Resident #2: dementia, hyperlipidemia, dementia, malnutrition, and depression. The Care Plan Focus Area Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), with an initiation date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of resident council notes, review of grievances and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure they had adequate staff members to answer resident's call lights, provide baths, and assist with toileting needs. The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings Include: 1. According to the quarterly MDS assessment tool with a reference date of 4/11/2025, Resident #8 had a BIMS score of 15. A BIMS of 15 suggested no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented he had an impairment on one side of his lower extremity and utilized a wheelchair. Resident #8 required partial/moderate assistance with upper body dressing, was dependent of staff for lower body dressing and required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene. The MDS documented a toilet transfer was not attempted due to his medical condition. Resident #8 was occasionally incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. The MDS documented the following diagnoses for the resident: diabetes mellitus, anemia, depression, weakness, insomnia, and left below the knee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records for 7 of 7 residents reviewed (Resident #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8). The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's shower/bath documentation from 2/1/2025 until 5/15/2025 revealed she was to receive a shower or bath on Mondays and Thursdays during the day shift. The documentation revealed the following: 2/3/2025-resident refused 2/10/2025-not applicable 2/13/2025-not applicable 2/24/2025-not applicable 3/13/2025-resident refused 3/24/2025-not applicable 3/27/2025-resident refused 3/31/2025-resident refused 4/7/2025-not applicable 4/14/2025-not applicable 4/17/2025-not applicable 4/28/2025-resident refused 5/1/2025-not applicable 5/8/2025-not applicable 5/15/2025-not applicable Record review revealed there were only two notes documented about her bathing refusals on 4/8/2025 and 4/29/2025. The progress notes lacked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility investigative file review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to implement their abuse policies. The facility's staff member with concerns about the treatment of Resident #3 was not reported within two hours of the concerns. The facility also failed to complete a thorough investigation. The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 2/6/2025, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. A BIMS score of 12 indicated no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she did not deny care during the 7-day review period. The MDS documented she did not have impairments to upper and lower extremities, but utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and required substantial/maximal assistance for toilet transfer. The MDS documented she was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel. The following diagnoses were listed for Resident #1: atrial fibrillation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility investigative file review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to report concerns about the treatment of Resident #3 within two hours of the alleged concerns observed. The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 2/6/2025, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. A BIMS score of 12 indicated no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she did not deny care during the 7-day review period. The MDS documented she did not have impairments to upper and lower extremities, but utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and required substantial/maximal assistance for toilet transfer. The MDS documented she was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel. The following diagnoses were listed for Resident #1: atrial fibrillation, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The Clinical Census revealed Resident #3 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility investigative file review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation. The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 2/6/2025, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. A BIMS score of 12 indicated no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she did not deny care during the 7-day review period. The MDS documented she did not have impairments to upper and lower extremities, but utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and required substantial/maximal assistance for toilet transfer. The MDS documented she was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel. The following diagnoses were listed for Resident #1: atrial fibrillation, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Record review revealed Resident #3 was discharged from the facility on 4/11/2025. The facility's investigative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 9 resident's care plans (Resident #3) was revised once her transfer assistance requirement was changed to the use of a mechanical lift. The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 2/6/2025, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. A BIMS score of 12 indicated no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she did not deny care during the 7-day review period. The MDS documented she did not have impairments to upper and lower extremities, but utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and required substantial/maximal assistance for toilet transfer. The MDS documented she was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel. The following diagnoses were listed for Resident #1: atrial fibrillation, heart failure, diabetes mellitus,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement additional individualized interventions for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) related to behaviors to assist residents with dementia in the completion of a task. Resident #3 refused staff to assist her to the bathroom and refused staff to check her for incontinence and change her when she was incontinent. The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 2/6/2025, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. A BIMS score of 12 indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she did not deny care during the 7-day review period. The MDS documented she did not have impairments to upper and lower extremities, but utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and required substantial/maximal assistance for toilet transfer. The MDS documented she was frequently incontinent of urine and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications and supplies stored in the medication room and medication carts were stored and held within their expiration dates. The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: On [DATE] at 10:40 AM during a medication room check with Staff B Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) present observed 12 unopened bottles of Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg), all with an expiration date of 4/2025. Staff B indicated she was under the impression the Director of Nursing (DON) overlooked the items in the medication room. The Regional Nurse Consultant was made aware of the expired Aspirin bottles. On [DATE] at 10:53 AM completed a check of the two medication carts with Staff C Certified Medication Aide (CMA) present. Noted one 3 milliliter (mL) empty syringe with an expiration date of [DATE] and one opened bottle of Aspirin 81 mg with an expiration date of 4/2025. The bottle was filled with tablets to the rim. Staff C was notified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interviews, observations, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide nursing staff to assure residents safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner for 4 of 16 resident reviewed (Resident #15, #20,#21 and #37). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #15 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #15 was frequently incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. The MDS indicated Resident #15 was dependent on staff for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, personal hygiene, transfers and rolling left to right. The MDS documented Resident #15 had diagnoses of quadriplegia and resided in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 1/27/25 at 1:16 PM Resident #15 stated through his communication device call lights frequently take longer than 20 minutes to answer. Resident #15 stated through his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to represent an accurate assessment of the resident's status during the observation period of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) by not accurately assessing the use of an anticoagulant for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Finding include: The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #6 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented use of an anticoagulant. Review of Resident #6's Care Plan revealed focus, goal, and interventions for an anticoagulant. On 1/27/25 at 3:09 PM Resident #6 stated the only blood thinner (anticoagulant) she took was baby Aspirin. Review of Resident #6's Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented a physician's order for Aspirin 81 mg one tablet by mouth daily for pain. On 1/29/25 at 9:41 AM Staff A, MDS coordinator stated that Aspirin 81 mg was identified as an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when administering medications for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #15 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #15 had diagnoses of quadriplegia. On 1/28/25 at 9:21 AM an observation revealed Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) completed hand hygiene, applied gloves and flushed Resident #15's enteral tube with 50 cc of water from pump prior to medication administration. Staff C administered medications to Resident #15 through the enteral tube. Gloves removed and hygiene completed. Gown was not donned by Staff C for medication administration for Resident #15. Review of Resident #15's Treatment Administration Record documented a physician's order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, resident, family, and staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide baths for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #5, #8 and #9) reviewed. The facility also failed to provide personal hygiene for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #8 and #11) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 5/22/24 Resident #5 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. A BIMS score of 13 suggested no cognitive impairment. The Care Plan focus area with an initiation date of 10/9/23 documented Resident #5 required the assistance of 2 staff for bathing. Review of the past 30 days of bathing documentation for Resident #5 revealed her bath days were Mondays and Thursday. Staff documented Resident #5 received a bath on the following dates: a. 5/27/24 Monday b. 5/30/24 Thursday c. 6/3/24 Monday d. 6/10/24 Monday e. 6/13/24 Thursday f. 6/17/24 Monday g. 6/20/24 Thursday h. 6/24/24 Monday Staff failed to give Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident council meeting notes, grievance/concerns investigation forms, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the facility had sufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents that included answering resident's call lights in a timely manner. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: Observations on 6/23/24 from 5:10 PM until roughly 6:30 PM revealed numerous call lights going off on the 200 hall: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] call light on at 5:10 PM, off at 5:32 PM; call light was on for 22 minutes b. room [ROOM NUMBER] call light on at 5:40 PM and remained on when checked on at 6:07 PM; at that time call light was on for 27 minutes. c. room [ROOM NUMBER] call light on at 6:07 PM, off at 6:23 PM; call light was on for 16 minutes. d. room [ROOM NUMBER] call light on at 6:00 PM, off at 6:16 PM; call light was on for 16 minutes. e. room [ROOM NUMBER] call light on at 5:36 PM, off at 6:16 PM; call light was on for 40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on grievance/concern investigation forms, staff interviews, employee file review, and review of job descriptions the facility failed to ensure qualified staff assisted in the kitchen when they did not have adequate staff working. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: Review of Grievance/Concern Investigation Forms revealed the following grievances: a. 4/23/24 a resident expressed frustration with staffing in the kitchen. Stated she's sick of not getting what she orders and the Administrator needed to figure it out. Action and follow-up: dietary manager was out unexpectedly. Administrator pulling staff from other departments to help cook and serve meals. b. 5/3/24 a resident asked for a peanut butter sandwich and they brought her the bread and the peanut butter packet, told her to make her own sandwich. She said for what she pays to stay here, her sandwich should be made for her. Action and follow-up: dietary manager spoke to all cooks about making the sandwich. This was done by a nursing staff that filled in as a cook. Education was provided. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to store and serve food in a sanitary manner. The facility also failed to maintain infection control practices while in the dish area when going from the dirty area to the clean area. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: On 6/18/24 at 10:23 AM observed three tubes of hamburger meat in a gray hard plastic bin with a tape label that indicated the hamburger was for Thursday 6/19/24 (Thursday was actually 6/20/24). Red, bloody looking, fluid gathered at the bottom of the gray hard plastic bin. This bin sat on the second to last shelf in the walk-in cooler with two cardboard boxes of stripped bacon on the shelf below. Also noted in the walk-in cooler, a box that contained 4 green peppers with what appeared mold on them (black and white fuzzy areas throughout). While speaking with the Dietary Manager, Staff A Dietary Aide, had gloved hands while in the dish area. With gloved hands he moved a trash can closer to the dish room, removed dishes (bowls, cups, small plates) from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to speak in a dignified manner around residents and failed to speak to residents in a dignified manner to 3 of 4 (Resident #5, #6 and #8) residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 5/22/24, Resident #5 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. A BIMS score of 13 suggested no cognitive impairment. On 6/25/24 at 2:52 PM when Resident #5 was asked how Staff P Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was during medication pass and treatments she stated she is a b*tch. When asked to elaborate she stated last week she told her roommate to get up by herself but she only needed a little boost and would not help her. Staff P is just a bitter person. Resident #5 had asked Staff P to shut the over head light in her room, she told her no, she's passing pills, I am busy, I can't help you. Resident #5 stated she sees and hears how testy she gets with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility investigation review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to supervise 1 of 3 cognitively impaired residents (Resident #1). Staff were unaware Resident #1 had left the building on 5/26/24 at approximately 4:50 PM. Staff responded to an alarmed door, looked out the door window, disarmed the door alarm and went back to work. The staff member failed to go outside to visually check to see if a resident had left the building. The staff member assumed he saw another staff member in the vicinity. The staff member also failed to initiate a head count to ensure all residents were accounted for. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: According to the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 3/13/24 Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7. A BIMS score of 7 suggested mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented he did not exhibit wandering behavior during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to properly dispose of room trays with left-over food in a timely manner. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: On 6/20/24 at 11:17 AM Staff S Dietary Aide stated when she comes in after having the weekend off she will find dishes still in resident's room from who knows what meal since she was gone all weekend. On 6/23/24 at 5:53 PM observed on Resident #12 entry table a white plate with a slice of wheat bread on it, bowl with milk in it, biscuit, egg, sausage sandwich on the plate as well. Also observed two drinking glasses, 1 of the glass was ½ full of milk. When asked how long those dishes has been there she stated breakfast and lunch. This happens all the time on the weekends, when staff not picking up her dishes. She indicated she went to the dining room this evening for dinner. On 6/27/24 at 3:39 PM observed on Resident #7's bedside table a white plate on top of a plate cover. A set of silverware lying on top of the plate, an empty sour cream packet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 residents' (Resident #6 and #7) vape pens were properly stored. The facility also failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident #7) used her vape pen outside in the designated smoking areas. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's clinical record revealed no documentation related to him being able to smoke with or without supervision. On 6/18/24 at 11:45 AM observed three vape pens in Resident #6's room on his dresser. On 6/23/24 at 5:32 PM observed Resident #6 outside with staff. Staff were assisting Resident #6 with his vape pen. 2. Review of Resident #7's clinical record revealed no documentation related to her being able to smoke with or without supervision. Clinical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 6/18/24 at 11:24 AM Staff D Registered Nurse (RN) stated she has been around vape…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel document review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to employ a clinically qualified nutrition professional by not having a certified dietary manager. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: On 1/30/24 a request for documentation from Staff O Dietary Manager, of qualifications for dietary manager revealed no certification or documentation. Interview on 1/30/24 at 9:02 AM, with Staff O revealed she was currently in charge of running the kitchen. Staff O stated she was not a certified dietary manager, a certified food service manager, does not have a certification for food service management and safety, does not have associate's or higher degree in food service, and does not have 2 or more years worth of experience in the position. Review of policy titled, Dietitian revealed that if a dietitian is not employed full time (35 or more hours per week) a director of food service management will be designated. This individual will be a certified dietary manager, be a certified food service manager, be nationally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-01 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility document review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to have the minimum members of the quality assessment and assurance committee meet quarterly. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: Review of documents titled, Quality Assurance Committee Meeting sign-in from 2/23 through 1/24 revealed 3/23 no DON or Infection Preventionist present, 4/23 no DON present, 5/23 no DON present, 7/23 no DON present, 8/23 no DON or Infection Preventionist present, 9/23 no DON or Infection Preventionist present, 10/23 no Infection Preventionist and only 5 members, and 1/24 only 5 members present for meetings. Review of the policy titled, QAPI Program Governance and Leadership revealed the following individuals serve on the committee: Administrator, or a designee who is in a leadership role, Director of Nursing Services, Medical Director, and Infection Preventionist. Also representatives of the following departments, as requested by the Administrator: Pharmacy, Social Services, Activity Services, Environmental Services, Human Resources, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to fully review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (#3, #15, #20, & #23) and failed to include family representatives of 1 of 1 resident reviewed (#15). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: 1. On 1/30/24 at 2:56 PM, Resident #15's family member revealed the resident was treated for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) at the beginning of December 2023 and the resident declined in her functional abilities and was no longer receiving therapy. The family member also indicated the resident had no representative present for the initial care conference. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08 of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of unspecified injury of the head, disorders of the peripheral nervous system, inflammatory bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets by not having a staff on duty at the facility trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for 5 days in the month of [DATE]. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: Review of documents titled, Daily Staffing Sheets for the month of [DATE] revealed the facility had no staff trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation on [DATE] from 6 PM till 6 AM, [DATE] from 6 PM till 6 AM, [DATE] from 6 PM till 10 PM, [DATE] from 10 PM till 6 AM, and [DATE] from 6 PM till 6 AM. On [DATE] at 9:00 AM the Administrator acknowledged on [DATE] 6 PM till 6 AM, [DATE] 6 PM till 6 AM, [DATE] 6 PM till 10 PM, [DATE] 10 PM till 6 AM, and [DATE] 6 PM till 6 AM there was not a CPR certified staff present at the facility. The Administrator stated the facility's expectation was that a staff member trained in providing CPR would be working at the facility 24 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure medications in a locked compartment for to 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #33). The facility also failed to label open medication with the date the medication was opened for 27 of 30 medications reviewed. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #33 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of physician orders for Resident #33's revealed a discontinued order for Lorazepam Intensol 2 mg/mL. Orders to give 0.25 mL by mouth as needed for restlessness. On 2/1/24 at 10:45 AM an observation of both medication carts and treatment cart revealed Vitamin D-3 2000 IU, Bisacodyl 5 mg, Vitamin E 180 mg, Vit D 1000 IU, Magnesium Oxide 400 mg, Multi-Vitamin, Cranberry 450 mg, B-12 500 mg, Folic Acid 400 mcg, Calcium 500 mg, Aleve 220 mg, Loratadine 10 mg, Vitamin B-12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility document review and staff interview the facility failed to follow the menu and prepare food to meet the nutritional needs of the resident for 1 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 19 residents. Findings include: On 1/30/24 at 12:56 PM a continuous observation of lunch service revealed a #10 white handled scoop used for the service of Spanish rice to all residents that requested the regular lunch except to residents with a pureed diet. Review of scoop sizes revealed a #10 scoop was 3 ¼ oz. Review of document titled, Therapeutic Spread report - Fall and Winter regular menu revealed #8 scoop, 4 oz. or ½ cup of Spanish rice to be served to all diets. An observation on 1/30/24 at 1:41 PM revealed Staff P [NAME] using a spatula to empty pureed Doritos chicken from the food processor into 2 bowls. 1/4 cup pureed mix left in the food processor. On 1/30/24 at 1:41 PM Staff P stated she eyeballed the size and made the bowls level with each other when splitting the portions of the pureed meal. Staff P stated she usually just…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to serve the appropriate diet type to 4 of 4 resident reviewed (#1, #8, #10, & #11). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/29/24 at 1:14 PM observed Resident #8 eating amd she spit out chunks of food in a napkin on her bedside table. She stated she had difficulty swallowing the food and indicated her diet was supposed to be pureed. She confirmed the chunks of food were carrots and potatoes. Her tray included a cookie and a slice of bread. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 of 15, indicating completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of retromolar cancer (area directly behind the last teeth), hyponatremia (low salt levels in the blood), malnutrition, sialoadenitis (inflamed salivary glands), and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). It also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards by not completing appropriate hand hygiene during meal preparation and service of a meal. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: An observation on 1/30/24 at 11:45 AM revealed Staff O, Dietary manager scooping ice from the ice machine and supporting the bottom front lip of the ice scoop with a bare hand and pouring it into tubs to keep liquids cold. Observed this repeated 6 times. An observation on 1/30/24 at 11:47 AM revealed Staff P [NAME] removed an entire loaf of bread from the sack with gloves on. Staff P placed the bread on the cooking sheet, used her right hand to butter the bread and left hand to hold the bread. Staff P obtained a bag of cheese from across the kitchen in a refrigerator, opened the bag and removed a stack of cheese from the bag of cheese. Staff P placed the cheese on the bread, placed the leftover cheese back into the bag and zipped the bag shut. Staff P obtained foil to cover the cooking sheet, put…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control practices to prevent infection and/or cross contamination. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: 1. On 1/29/24 at 12:51 PM, Resident #20 observed receiving nasal cannula oxygen while she slept in bed. The tubing labeled with an orange sticker and dated 1/28/24. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a BIMS score of 8 out of 15, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. It included diagnoses of pneumonia, Coronary Artery Disease, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, and hypoxemia (low blood oxygen level). The Electronic Health Record (EHR) included a physician's order dated 1/14/24 directing staff to titrate oxygen to keep the resident's oxygen saturation (O2 sat) above 90%. The Care Plan lacked documentation of the use of oxygen therapy. On 1/29/24 at 1:41 PM, observed the resident lying in the same position with her blanket…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, visitor interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: Observation on 1/29/24 at 12:45 PM of the facility resident halls revealed a pungent odor of urine noted primarily in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] and extended past room [ROOM NUMBER]. The same odor noted upon entry of the 200 hallway and noted primarily around rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. On 2/01/24 at 10:45 AM, Staff T, Housekeeping Aide (HA) stated the facility is cleaned on a routine schedule and housekeeping relied on nursing staff for notification of subsequent cleaning needs. She stated the toilet in room [ROOM NUMBER] leaked within the last year and staff have not been able to rid the facility of the urine odor. Subsequent observations on 1/30/24, 1/31/24, and 2/01/24 revealed the odor not as pungent but could still be noted in both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that residents have the right to receive written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room or roommate in the facility is changed for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #37). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented Resident #37 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (no cognitive impairment). The MDS documented the resident required substantial assistance for toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, footwear, and functional transfers. Resident #37 completed transfers with the use of dependent weight bearing lift. The MDS documented Resident #37 had diagnoses including: chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, chronic kidney disease stage 3, hypertensive chronic kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely notification to the physician or family when changes occurred in the resident's physical or mental condition for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #15 & #17). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: 1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08 of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of inflammatory bowel disease, retinal vascular occlusion (an eye condition that causes blurred vision), and right eye glaucoma. It also revealed she had not had a poor appetite during the previous seven (7) day look-back period but required only setup assistance with eating. The Care Plan dated 10/13/23 indicated the resident was at risk for altered nutrition and weight loss and directed staff to monitor her diet tolerance. The Progress Note dated 11/13/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that residents' equipment was kept clean and in good repair for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #4). The facility census was 40 residents. Findings Include: Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #4 required the use of a wheelchair (w/c), and required partial/moderate assistance for transfers. The MDS documented the Resident #4 had diagnoses of syncope and collapse, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, other secondary Parkinsons, chronic atrial fibrillation, essential (primary) hypertension, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, metabolic disorder, hypothyroidism, allergy, depression, and melena. The Care Plan revised on 1/4/24 revealed that Resident #4 utilized a w/c for long distance mobility. Observations revealed the following: On 01/29/24 at 12:00 PM Resident #4's w/c…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #15) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08 of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of unspecified injury of the head and disorders of the peripheral nervous system. It revealed the resident was dependent with toileting and personal hygiene but indicated the resident had not had a UTI in the last 30 days. On 1/30/24 at 2:56 PM, Resident #15's family member revealed the resident was treated for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) at the beginning of December 2023. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) physician orders indicated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (#15, #17, & #20). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: 1. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. It included diagnoses of fractures other than her hip, disorders of the peripheral nervous system, and sprain of the ligaments of the lumbar spine (lower back). It also revealed the resident dependent for putting on and removing footwear and required a wheelchair for mobility. The Care Plan dated 12/22/23 directed staff to ensure the resident had moon boot heel protectors on the left lower extremity at all times. On 1/29/24 at 2:56 PM, Resident #15's family member indicated the resident should have moon boots (a device used to stabilize sprains, fractures, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and reviews of policy the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice regarding respiratory treatments, oxygen administration and insulin administration per orders for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. The facility census was 40. Findings Include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented that Resident #37 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident required substantial assistance for toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, footwear, and functional transfers. Resident #37 completed transfers with the use of dependent weight bearing lift. Resident #37 had diagnoses to include: chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, anxiety disorder, venous insufficiency (chronic peripheral), morbid (severe) obesity, and personal history of pulmonary embolism. Resident #37 was on supplemental oxygen therapy via nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide restorative activities for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (#15 & #23). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: 1. On 1/29/24 at 2:56 PM, Resident #15's family member stated the resident had declined in her functional abilities and was no longer receiving therapy. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08 of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of inflammatory bowel disease, retinal vascular occlusion (an eye condition that causes blurred vision), and right eye glaucoma. The MDS indicated the resident was independent with mobility, required moderate assistance with toilet and shower transfers, and substantial assistance with ambulating 10 feet. She also required setup or supervision assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and moderate assistance with putting on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide an opportunity for bath or shower to 1 of 5 residents (Residents #3) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #3 dated 11/22/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further revealed diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and hemiplegia. Review of the Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) document labeled Plan of Care (POC) Response History for 1/1/24 through 1/29/24 revealed Resident #3 had been given a bath/shower on 1/6/24 and 1/8/24. This document further revealed that Resident #3 refused bath/shower on the 4th, 18th, and 22nd of January. During an observation 1/29/24 at 12:55 PM of Resident #3 revealed her hair uncombed and disheveled. During an interview 1/30/24 at 1:42 PM with Staff J Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) revealed baths and showers will be documented in the EHR if a resident refused and she would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent a resident from developing a preventable pressure ulcer for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: On 1/29/24 at 2:56 PM, Resident #15's family member indicated the resident had multiple pressure ulcers that were not present upon admission. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of inflammatory bowel disease, retinal vascular occlusion (an eye condition that causes blurred vision), and right eye glaucoma. It also indicated the resident did not have any pressure ulcers but was at risk of developing them. The Care Plan dated 10/13/23 indicated the resident was at risk for altered nutrition and weight loss and directed staff to monitor her diet tolerance. The Braden Scale…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family interview, clinical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status by failing to prevent excessive weight loss and dehydration for 1 of 1 resident (#15). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: On 1/30/24 at 2:56 PM, Resident #15's family member indicated the resident had not received assistance with meals and she was transported to the Emergency Department and received intravenous (IV) fluids. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of inflammatory bowel disease, retinal vascular occlusion (an eye condition that causes blurred vision), and right eye glaucoma. It also revealed she had not had a poor appetite during the previous seven (7) day look-back period but required only setup assistance with eating. The Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to implement policies and procedures regarding the technical aspect of feeding tubes by not verifying gastrostomy tube (G-tube) is functioning properly before administering medications for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #18) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #18 dated 12/6/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed diagnosis of quadriplegia, anoxic brain damage, seizure disorder, dysphagia, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) tab labeled orders revealed physician orders for 18 french g-tube, three times a day verify tube placement every shift for AM, Midday, and bedtime, three times a day check residual every shift if less than 30mL (milliliters) note in progress note, and every 4 hours Jevity 1.5 formula with a flow rate of 50 ml per hour x 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide dialysis services consistent with professional standards by not completing a pre and post dialysis assessments for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #30) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #30 dated 11/1/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed diagnosis of end-stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) document titled Clinical Physician Orders revealed orders for pre-dialysis and post-dialysis evaluations on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays related to dependence on renal dialysis. Further review revealed an order for non-dialysis day evaluation every day shift on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, and Sundays related to end stage renal disease. Review of the EHR document titled Clinical-Assessment from 1/1/24 through 1/29/24 revealed pre-dialysis assessments…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater by having a medication error rate of 7.41%. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #37 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Observation completed of 26 medications administered and 1 medication ordered but not administered. A total of 27 medication administration opportunities for error. Observation of 2 medication administration errors when Staff A had intention on giving 6 units of Insulin Glargine (long acting insulin) when 6 units of Aspart Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Aspart) was ordered. This revealed a medication error rate of 7.41%. Review of Resident #37's physician orders revealed an order for Insulin Glargine Solostar Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure the residents were free of significant medication errors to 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #37). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #37 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #37's physician orders revealed an order for Insulin Glargine Solostar Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine) inject 25 unit subcutaneously at bedtime for diabetes and an order for Insulin Aspart Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Aspart) inject 6 units under the skin three times daily before meals. During an observation on 1/31/24 at 8:30 AM of insulin administration observed Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), draw up 6 units of Insulin Glargine (long acting insulin) and enter Resident #37's room with the insulin. On 1/31/24 at 8:39 AM Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observations, resident interviews, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature to 3 of 5 residents ( Residents #6, #8, and #9) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #6 dated 12/27/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. During an interview on 1/29/24 at 2:45 PM Resident #6 revealed that sometimes food is cold when it should be hot. 2. Review of the MDS for Resident #9 dated 12/23/23 revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. During an interview on 1/29/24 at 3:13 PM Resident #9 revealed that the food is sometimes cold when it should be hot. 3. On 1/30/24 at 1:36 PM a sample tray taken to the residents rooms. On 1/30/24 01:38 PM the sample tray returned to the kitchen and the temperature of the food obtained. The temperature of the rice registered 101.9 degrees, the Dorito chicken 122.4 degrees, and the corn 103.7 degrees. On 1/30/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with family and staff, and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment and failed to alleviate offense odors throughout the facility. The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). He required extensive assistance with the help of 2 for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toileting. The care plan for Resident #3 indicated that he had a suprapubic catheter and required a mechanical lift for transfers. Diagnosis included; acquired absence of the right great toe, anxiety disorder, cellulitis and obesity. Observation on 7/31/23 at 7:30 AM it was noted that there was a heavy urine smell around the nurse's station. The smell became increasingly stronger down the 200 hallway and in the room of Resident #3. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), Staff M, was emptying the catheter bag the was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat 2 of 13 residents with dignity and respect. Resident #6 was found to be soaked with urine in the morning and she told the staff that she had been instructed to urinate in her brief. Resident #6 was told to decrease his fluid intake so he didn't have to be taken to the restroom so often. The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: 1) According to theadmission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognitive skills. The resident required extensive assistance with the help of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfers and toileting. The resident was occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. The Care Plan initially dated on 3/29/23 showed that the resident had acute pain related to cervical vertebrae fracture and she was on an antibiotic for a urinary tract infection. On 8/1/23 at 9:42 AM, Family Member (FM)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with family, record and policy review the facility failed to notify family of an emergency transfer for 1 of 3 resident reviewed. When Resident #6 was sent to the hospital, staff failed to contact the family. The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. She required extensive assistance with the help of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfers and toileting. She was occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. The Care Plan initially dated on 3/29/23 showed that the resident had acute pain related to cervical vertebrae fracture and she was on an antibiotic for a urinary tract infection. A Nurses Note dated 6/3/23 at 4:24 PM, showed that Resident #6 was sent to the hospital that afternoon and the primary care physician and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified. The nurse was later told that the resident had passed away…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide comprehensive care plans for 3 of 13 residents reviewed. Resident #9 was admitted with a chronic heel ulcer the care plan lacked goals and interventions to prevent worsening of pressures. Resident #11 had a suprapubic urinary catheter, the care plan lacked details on specific catheter cares. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) the care plan lacked notice of the virus and any special precautions for staff to take. The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 7:55 AM, revealed Resident #9 in his bed on his back, wearing gripper socks and his heels rested on the bed. The resident reported a sore on his left heel. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). He required extensive assistance with the help of 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow up with physician orders for 3 of 13 residents reviewed. Resident #9 had an order for wound care on a chronic heel ulcer. The order did not get entered into the electronic chart. Upon admission, Resident #7 had an order for daily weights and orthostatic blood pressures, the facility failed to follow through with this order. Resident #6 developed a pressure sore and the dietician recommended some supplements. Staff failed to make sure the doctor received the recommendations and wrote an order. The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: 1. In an observation on 8/1/23 at 7:55 AM, Resident #9 was in his bed on his back, wearing gripper socks and his heels were resting on the bed. The resident said he had a sore on his left heel. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). He required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to use safe transfer techniques for 2 of 3 residents, and failed to implement an intervention to prevent falls for 1 of 3 residents. (Resident#3, #2, #13). The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). He required extensive assistance with the help of 2 for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toileting. The Care Plan for Resident #3 indicated that he had a suprapubic catheter (date initiated 8/6/19) and required a mechanical lift for transfers (date initiated 9/16/22). Diagnosis included; acquired absence of the right great toe, anxiety disorder, cellulitis and obesity. On 7/31/23 at 7:57 AM Resident #3 sat on the edge of the bed as Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), Staff F, and CNA, Staff A, pushed the EZ Stand mechanical lift in front of him and applied the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate urinary catheter care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. After surgery for a suprapubic catheter, Resident #11 continued to have leakage and staff failed to notify the urologist. The resident was found to have the catheter bag on the bed next to him and not hung lower than the bladder. The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: According to the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], Resident #11 required extensive assistance with the help of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toileting. A BIMS assessment dated [DATE] showed a score of 14 (intact cognitive ability). The resident had an indwelling catheter and diagnosis included; renal insufficiency, benign prostate hyperplasia, The Care Plan updated on 11/27/22 showed that the resident was frequently incontinent of urine with history of catheter use. The care plan lacked information regarding the suprapubic catheter. A review of the clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to implement infection control practices for 1 of 13 residents reviewed. Resident #3 had a urinary catheter and staff hooked the bag on the trash can while he was in his recliner during the day. The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). He required extensive assistance with the help of 2 for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toileting. The care plan for Resident #3 indicated that he had a suprapubic catheter and required a mechanical lift for transfers. Diagnosis included; acquired absence of the right great toe, anxiety disorder, cellulitis and obesity. On 7/31/23 at 2:16, Resident #3 was sitting in his recliner chair with the catheter bag hooked on the trashcan next to the chair. He said that he stayed in his recliner chair all day and he would let the staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARE INITIATIVES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Correctionville Specialty CareCorrectionville, IA 1 of 5Crestview Specialty CareWest Branch, IA 1 of 5Heritage Specialty CareCedar Rapids, IA 1 of 5Kingsley Specialty CareKingsley, IA 1 of 5Parkridge Specialty CarePleasant Hill, IA 1 of 5Ravenwood Specialty CareWaterloo, IA 1 of 5Westwood Specialty CareSioux City, IA 2 of 5Chariton Specialty CareChariton, IA 2 of 5Creston Specialty CareCreston, IA 2 of 5Dubuque Specialty CareDubuque, IA 2 of 5Lantern Park Specialty CareCoralville, IA 2 of 5New London Specialty CareNew London, IA 2 of 5Northcrest Specialty CareWaterloo, IA 2 of 5Northern Mahaska Specialty CareOskaloosa, IA 2 of 5Pinnacle Specialty CareCedar Falls, IA 2 of 5Southridge Specialty CareMarshalltown, IA 2 of 5Stratford Specialty CareStratford, IA 3 of 5Atlantic Specialty CareAtlantic, IA 3 of 5Centerville Specialty CareCenterville, IA 3 of 5Cherokee Specialty CareCherokee, IA 3 of 5Eldora Specialty CareEldora, IA 3 of 5Manly Specialty CareManly, IA 3 of 5Montezuma Specialty CareMontezuma, IA 3 of 5Odebolt Specialty CareOdebolt, IA 3 of 5Panora Specialty CarePanora, IA 3 of 5Ridgewood Specialty CareOttumwa, IA 3 of 5Southern Hills Specialty CareOsceola, IA 3 of 5West Ridge Specialty CareKnoxville, IA 4 of 5Bedford Specialty CareBedford, IA 4 of 5Belle Plaine Specialty CareBelle Plaine, IA 4 of 5Corning Specialty CareCorning, IA 4 of 5Corydon Specialty CareCorydon, IA 4 of 5Dunlap Specialty CareDunlap, IA 4 of 5Laporte City Specialty CareLa Porte City, IA 4 of 5Lyon Specialty CareRock Rapids, IA 4 of 5Oakwood Specialty CareAlbia, IA 5 of 5Fonda Specialty CareFonda, IA 5 of 5Lamoni Specialty CareLamoni, IA 5 of 5Mechanicsville Specialty CareMechanicsville, IA 5 of 5Sibley Specialty CareSibley, IA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CARE INITIATIVESOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/01/2012
COMPUTERSHARE CORPORATE TRUST COMPANY, NAOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
BEAL, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2020
BOWEN, LANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
CAROTHERS, MARY JANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
CHILDS, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2023
CORLESS, PETERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
KREIN, KEITHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
RUST, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
STURM, DENISEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
UPMEYER, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
DIXON, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2016
DRAKE, EMILYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/04/2023
GILYARD, TANYAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/23/2025
KUHN, JERAMYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2008
MCDYER, JESSICAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2023
BOEVE, DESTINYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
MONROE, MARQUITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/09/2025
WALTERS, JEFFERYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2025
WEI, SHIPENGIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$368K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 8%Other / private 36%

This home reported $368K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$278per resident / day
operating cost
$8,436per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$258per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165294. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next