No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Parkridge Specialty Care

5800 NE 12TH Avenue, Pleasant Hill, IA 50327 · Non profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (515) 265-5348 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (515) 265-5348 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 20243 actual-harm citations$34,450 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $34,450 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-07)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5900 E University Ave Ste 100 · (515) 643-2400 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5042 Maple Dr · (515) 266-4167 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5500 E University Ave · (515) 262-5951 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5415 E Oakwood Dr · (515) 309-9453 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6010 NE 12th Ave · (515) 299-5433

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.8%17.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%4.2%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.8%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.5%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.4%20.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.3%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control33.4%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.1%19.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.4%73.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.4%20.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%13.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.921.491.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.412.081.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 115 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
34.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 34.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.6%CMS range 42.8–61.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 8.0–17.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge34.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.5–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.70
RN hours/ resident / day
0.34
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.23
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
44.9%
Total nursing turnover
30.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 85.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-07)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-07-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review and policy review the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent a deep tissue injury (a type of pressure injury that occurs when underlying soft tissue is damaged due to prolonged pressure, often over bony prominence.) from performing for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #8) and failed to apply treatment to a Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD) area on the coccyx (the final bone at the bottom of the spine) for which resulted in the area had gotten worse and the Advance Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP was notified 7 days later. (Resident #9). The facility identified a census of 84 residents. Findings include: Determining the Stage of Pressure Injury: Stage 1 Pressure Injury: Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin Intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable erythema, which may appear differently in darkly pigmented skin. Presence of blanchable erythema or changes in sensation, temperature, or firmness may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, family, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to promptly identify and intervene for an acute change in a resident's condition, chest pain, shortness of breath, cough and urinary incontinence related to fluid volume overload. As a result the family transported the resident to the emergency department. Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital with acute hypoxic (lack of oxygen) respiratory failure due to pulmonary edema (excessive fluid in the lungs), sinus bradycardia (slowing of the heart), acute diastolic heart failure and swelling in the scrotum due to the edema. Concerns were identified for 1 or 3 residents reviewed for assessment and intervention. (Resident#1). The facility reported a census 81 of residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #1 revealed the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (dysrthythmia of the heart), dementia, depression, alcohol abuse The MDS documented that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to promptly assess a resident with a change in condition and provide skin assessments in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #13, #1 and #11). The facility reported census was 82. Findings include: 1. According to an admit Progress Note dated 9/1/23 at 2:40 p.m. Resident #13 is an [AGE] year old male admitted following a hospital stay for pneumonia. Resident is alert and awake and oriented to person, place and time. Resident #13 is calm and cooperative and voices no concerns. Resident #13 was admitted for further recovery and physical and occupational therapy. Resident #13 is an assist of one staff with his wheel walker during transfers and ambulation. The Care Plan dated 9/1/23 documented Resident #13 had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and used oxygen therapy. The care plan directed staff to monitor for difficulty with breathing and to monitor for signs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the Provider History Report, State Agency Website, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI), staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to adequately address repeat regulatory violations in the following regulatory categories: F812, F880, F725, and F684. The facility reported a census of 86. Findings include: A review of the State Agency Website documented the following deficiencies: F684: 8/11/22, 8/28/24, 10/7/25, and again most recently with the survey ending 5/20/26. F725: 8/11/22, 2/26/24, and again with the survey ending 5/20/26. F812: 8/11/22, 8/28/24, 10/7/25, and with the survey ending 5/20/26. F880: 8/11/22, 2/26/24, 8/28/24, and again with the survey ending 5/20/26. A review of the Federal Provider History Report, printed on 5/20/26, verified the findings of the State Agency Website. In an interview on 5/20/26 at 4:05 PM the Administrator acknowledged the repeat deficiencies and stated the facility would implement a performance Improvement Plans (PIPs), to address the four repeated categories. She cited staff turnover as the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to uphold the established grievance process when staff members failed to report repeated resident grievances to management. The facility reported a census of 86.Findings include:Review of Grievance Logs from January 2026 through May 2026 documented at least 7 instances of lost or missing resident items, with 3 of them documenting missing clothing.1. On 5/12/26 at 11:39 AM Resident #1's Representative stated the family is constantly reporting missing clothing to the Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs). Resident #1's Representative stated they have clothing go missing so often they have started buying outfits every week to keep up.2. Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #11's entry date as 4/1/26. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition.On 5/12/26 at 3:17 PM Resident #11 stated he lost T-shirts when he first…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on direct observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain adequate staffing to ensure residents had access to timely requests for help, as noted by excessively long call light times. The facility reported a census of 86. Findings include: 1. On 5/12/26 from 3:15 PM until 3:43 PM a continuous direct observation identified a call light for Resident #11 continuously engaged, only changing status at 3:43 PM when a staff member finally entered the room. Review of clinical records from this incident didn't document a call light. Resident #11 confirmed he pushed the call light. On 5/12/26 at 3:45 PM Resident #11 stated the staff member observed responding to the light at 3:43 PM was the first staff member to address his light.On 5/12/26 at 3:17 PM Resident #11 and Resident #11's Representative stated call lights take a significant amount of time, often lasting well over 15 minutes. Resident #11 stated It can take a while to get people…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on direct observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect. An observation revealed a member of the therapy team ignored the wishes of the resident for 2 of 7 residents screened for dignity related concerns (Residents #13 and #14). The facility reported a census of 86.Findings include: 1. Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure upon standing), renal insufficiency (kidney failure), malnutrition, asthma, unsteadiness on feet, generalized muscle weakness, abnormality of gait and mobility.The Care Plan for Resident #13 identified they received Physical and Occupational Therapy services.On 5/14/26 at 12:51 PM Resident #13 identified Staff J, Physical Therapist (PT), and said they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have an order for a resident to self-administer their own medications before leaving them unattended with Miralax for 2 of 2 residents observed (Residents #10 and #16). The facility reported a census of 86. Findings include:Findings include:1. Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition.The Physician Orders included an order dated 4/18/26 to give Miralax (powdered medication mixed with liquid) one time per day for constipation. The Physician Orders didn't include an order to allow Resident #10 to self-administer medications.On 5/12/26 at 12:27 PM Staff E, Certified Medication Aide (CMA), left a cup of prepared Miralax with Resident #10. By the end of lunch service, Resident #10 hadn't consumed the Miralax, and it's left behind on the table. Dietary staff eventually threw away the cup of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete resident assessments for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for assessment and interventions (Residents #3 and #4). Resident #3 lacked the completion of neurological checks (neuros) after an unwitnessed fall. Resident #4 lacked nursing assessment and follow-up post same-day surgery. The facility reported a census of 86.Findings include:1. Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #4 depended on staff for personal care needs (bathing and toileting) and relied on a wheelchair for ambulation. The MDS included diagnoses of acute kidney failure, diabetes, and incontinence. The Nurses Note dated 2/27/26 at 12:22 PM indicated the Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) completed a pre-operative physical on Resident #4 related to same-day surgical procedures scheduled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate resident supervision during severe weather warning as well implement Care Plan interventions after a series of falls (Resident #16) for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for supervision. The facility reported a census of 86. Findings include:Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of difficulty in walking, cognitive communications defect, Wernicke's Encephalopathy (brain damage caused by vitamin B1 deficiency), weakness, need for assistance with personal cares, and generalized muscle weakness. The Care Plan revised 5/1/26 documented Resident #3's had a risk for falls. The Care Plan included the following Interventions:a. 4/23/26: Resident #3 had anxiety during tornadoes, please don't leave her unattended. b. 3/11/26: obtain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, staff, and Resident Representative interviews, the facility failed to follow-up after a significant change in weight in short period of time for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #2 and #11). Both residents had significant changes in weight in less than a month. The facility reported a census of 86 residents. Findings include:1. Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] he MDS included diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (diabetes), cerebrovascular accident (stroke), hemiplegia or hemiparesis (partial paralysis), malnutrition, and oropharyngeal phase dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). It documented Resident #2 had an enteral feeding tube due to difficulty swallowing and had lost weight due to an inability to intake food normally.The Care Plan revised 4/14/26 documented Resident #2 had an altered nutritional status due to partial paralysis after a stroke. It instructed staff members to obtain weights as ordered by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer significant medications correctly when a nurse failed to correctly prime an insulin pen before administration, risking the resident not receiving a sufficient dose of the medication for 1 of 8 residents sampled for medication administration (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 86. Findings include: Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident had intact cognition with a score of 15. The MDS included diagnoses of anemia (low blood iron), hypertension (high blood pressure), renal insufficiency (kidney failure), diabetes mellitus (diabetes), and cellulitis (skin infection) of the right lower limb. The MDS indicated Resident #15 used insulin during the lookback period.The Care Plan revised 5/8/26, documented Resident #15 required insulin therapy for diabetes. The Interventions directed staff members to administer insulin as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate food handling practices were followed for 2 of 2 dining rooms observed. The facility reported a census of 86. Findings include: During a continuous lunch service observation in the Assist Dining Room on 5/12/26 at 12:12 PM, Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant, used their bare hands to touch and butter a slice of bread at the table for a resident. Once finished the resident proceeded to eat the bread. At 12:38 PM, Staff B sneezed directly into their hand and without completing any hand hygiene, provided feeding assistance to a resident. During a continuous lunch service observation in the Main Dining Room on 5/12/16 at 12:10 PM, observed Staff C, Dietary Aide, touch, cut, and prepare a fresh [NAME] with their bare hands at the table for a resident.During an interview on 5/14/26 at 4:00 PM, the Administrator acknowledged staff should not touch ready-to-eat resident food with their bare hands. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facilty failed to complete glove change and hand hygiene during personal cares, implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as indicated, and proper glucometer cleaning for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident #8, #11, and #15). The facility reported a census of 86. Findings include:1. Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on 3/18/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (progressive memory loss) and stroke (brain tissue damage). The MDS noted Resident #8 depended on staff for chair to bed transfers, bed mobility, personal hygiene, and toileting hygiene.On 5/12/26 at 12:45 PM observed Staff F, Hospice Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and Staff G, Hospice CNA, enter Resident #8's room to complete toileting cares and personal hygiene. Staff F and Staff G put gloves on, transferred Resident #8 from the wheelchair to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to treat 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for dignity with respect by applying multiple incontinent briefs during personal hygiene care. The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings included: The 11/21/25 Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included sepsis(an infection of the blood), weakness, the need for assistance with personal care. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS stated the resident was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and toilet transfers. The facility policy Dignity, revised February 2021, stated the facility would care for residents in a manner that promoted and enhanced a sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life , and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. 8/25/25 Care Plan entries stated the resident required the assistance of 2 staff for toilet transfers. The entries stated the resident had urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out assessments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a change in condition(Resident #1) by failing to carry out timely skin assessments after a hospitalization. The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings included:The 11/21/25 Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included sepsis(an infection of the blood), weakness, and the need for assistance with personal care. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The facility policy Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol, revised April 2018, stated the nursing staff would examine the skin of newly admitted residents for evidence of existing pressure ulcers or other skin conditions. A 9/8/25 Care Plan entry directed staff to monitor and document location, size, and treatment of skin injuries and to report abnormalities. 11/18/25 Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food served and prepared in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility reported a census of 88.Findings include: Review of August 2025 food temperature logs noted the following: 1.No breakfast temperature documentation for 21 days out of 31 2.No lunch temperature documentation for 21 days out of 31 3.No supper temperature documentation for 10 days out of 31Review of September food temperature logs noted the following: 1.No breakfast temperature documentation for 9 days out of 30 2.No lunch temperature documentation for 11 days out of 30 3.No supper temperature documentation for 21 days out of 30During a continuous lunch service observation on 10/1/25 at 11:45 AM, the following noted 1.An electrical extension cord wrapped to a bar on the service table noted with visible dried food splatter and grime 2.Top of cabinets, which were located above a food prep area, noted with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, staff failed to transfer a resident using a technique which would not place pressure on the resident's compromised left foot and failed to notify the podiatrist in a timely manner of an open area for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin ulcers(Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 88 residents.Findings included: The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 8/20/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #6 which included osteomyelitis(infection of the bone) of the foot, diabetes, and heart failure. The MDS stated the resident required substantial to maximal assistance with chair to bed transfers and listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 3 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The facility policy Wound Care, revised October 2010, stated the purpose of the procedure was to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. The policy directed staff to review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident.A 4/15/25 Foot and Ankle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on electronic health record (EHR) review, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were aware of and offered alternative menu options for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for food (Residents #4 and #79). The facility reported a census of 88.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, completed 7/29/25, revealed Resident #4 with a Brief Interview for Metal Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognitive status. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic pain, diabetes, hemiplegia/hemiparesis, malnutrition, and peripheral vascular/arterial disease. The MDS indicated Resident #4 with a physician-prescribed weight loss regimen which resulted in a significant weight loss within the past six months. The Care Plan revised on 8/6/25 indicated Resident #4 at risk for altered nutrition status related to diabetes, COPD, and advanced age. The Care Plan noted the presence of right above the knee amputation surgical incision with dehiscence and the decision for palliative care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a document of call light start and end time, resident interview, staff interview, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to consistently answer call lights within a reasonable amount of time for 4 of 4 residents. (#2, #5, #8 and #11) The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: 1 The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #2 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment and has the ability to be understood and understands others. The MDS documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that affect the arms legs, and facial muscles) and macular degeneration (an eye disease that can blur your central vision) and required dependence with personal hygiene, transfer and toileting and always incontinent of bladder and bowel. On 6/25/25 at 11:40 a.m., Resident #2 stated that she can read the clock on the wall. Resident #2 stated that it takes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interview, facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the comprehensive Care Plan for 1 of 3 (Resident #2) reviewed for care plans. The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #2, dated 6/18/25, coded the resident dependent on assistance for personal hygiene, transfers and bed mobility. The MDS documented diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms legs, and facial muscles) and macular degeneration (damage to the eyes retina, causing loss of vision). The Care Plan of Resident #2, revision date 1/2/25, identified a focus area of the Resident will continue to participate during my activities of daily living (ADL) as my condition allows. The Care Plan directed the staff she required 2 staff to assist me with cares, and 2 assist with bed mobility and 2 assist with upper and lower body dressing. Observation on 6/25/25 at 11:40 a.m., with Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care appropriately to prevent cross contamination for 1 of 3 residents observed for incontinence care (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #3 had short and long term memory problems, severely impaired for decision making abilities, required substantial to maximal staff assistance for all aspects of daily living and incontinent of bowel. The MDS revealed diagnosis of quadriplegia (a condition characterized by paralysis in all four limbs (arms and legs). The Care Plan of Resident #3, revision date 8/16/24, identified a focus area of the Resident not experience any skin conditions from incontinence. The Care Plan directed the staff to assist me with perineal cleansing as needed and observe my skin daily for irritation and redness. Observation on 6/25/25 at 11:15 a.m., Staff K, Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to notify the Physician and family when a resident experienced a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #1). The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: The Clinical Census revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 1/27/25. Resident #1 did not have a Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed due to new admission to the facility. A Progress Note titled BIMS evaluation (Brief Interview for Mental Status) dated 1/24/25 identified a score of 8, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses of delirium, altered mental status, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, pleural effusion, acute kidney failure, asthma, atrial fibrillation and a stroke affecting the left side. Review of Bowel Elimination form for Resident #1 revealed two large loose/diarrhea stools on 1/25/25 and three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, facility investigation review and policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within 2 hours to the Iowa Department of Inspections, Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #2 and #3). The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: An Incident Report (IR) dated 1/8/25 at 3:30 PM documented Resident #2 was arguing with Resident #3 over who was going to marry the medication aide in that hallway. When the staff member entered the room, she observed Resident #2 standing over the bed of Resident #3 and Resident #3 reported Resident #2 had hit him on his right arm. Resident #2 confessed to hitting Resident #3. The report documented that both residents were separated. Review of document titled Intake Information revealed the facility filed an allegation for abuse related to a Resident to Resident Altercation for Resident #2 and Resident #3 on 1/9/25 at 12:06 AM. On 2/3/25 at 8:59 AM, the Administrator acknowledged and verified the incident occurred on 1/8/25 at 3:30 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #2). The facility failed to implement physician orders in a timely manner. The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia. An Email Correspondence received by the DON (Director of Nursing) from the facility Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) on 1/14/25 at 7:05 PM documented the following new Physician orders for Resident #1: -Increase Jardiance (diabetic medication) from 10 MG (milligrams) to 25 MG daily -Increase Insulin Glargine bedtime dose to 28 units subcutaneous -Start Cimetidine (medication used to decrease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide assessment and interventions necessary for the care and services, to maintain the residents' highest practical physical well- being for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1 and #2). The facility failed to complete and document nursing assessments related to nausea, vomiting and diarrhea for Resident #1. The facility also failed to complete vital signs with neurological assessments and complete a range of motion (ROM) assessment after a fall for Resident #1. The facility also failed to complete and document nursing assessments related diuretic usage for fluid overload and assess/monitor the efficacy and side effects of new medications started for fluid overload, sexual inhibition, anxiety and depression for Resident #2. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: 1. The Clinical Census revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 1/27/25.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, family interviews, hospital record review and policy review the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent accidents and injuries for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1) for falls. Resident #1 was identified as a fall risk prior and upon admission and interventions to prevent falls were not implemented upon admission to the facility. Resident #1 fell two times on the same day within 48 hours of admission. Based on staff interviews and documentation the staff did not provide appropriate level of assistance with transfers and the facility failed to complete a thorough assessment including vital signs and range of motion (ROM) after a fall occurred. The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: The Clinical Census revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 1/27/25. Resident #1 did not have a Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed due to new admission to the facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary practices by improperly storing food and failed to maintain essential kitchen equipment. The facility reported a census of 87 residents. Findings include: On 8/25/24 at 8:50 AM, an initial kitchen observation revealed the following findings. a) Three (3) clear, plastic containers with brown flakes, different colored rings, and opaque rice shaped objects b) A previously opened, undated bag of shredded cheese c) Opened bottle of apple cider and regular vinegar stored on a rack shelf with Worcestershire Sauce and Hickory Smoke sauce bottles for resident consumption d) A previously opened, undated and unlabeled bag of light brow, disc shaped items. e) Empty food packages stored on a rack with dry goods f) A white, unlabeled storage bin containing white powder and a scoop inside. g) A previously opened clear, blue undated and unlabeled plastic bag containing a light pink substance stored on a pan in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, guidance from the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a quarterly assessment for 1 of 18 (Res #73) residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 87 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #73 documented an Assessment Reference Date of 4/19/24, with the most recent admission date of 4/15/2024. The MDS documented that the resident came from a hospital stay. The MDS Section of the Electronic Health Record of Resident #73, reviewed 8/26/24 at 3:32 pm, documented no MDS had been completed since his admission MDS of 4/19/24. The October 2023 Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual directed a quarterly assessment must be completed 92 days from the prior MDS assessment Assessment Reference Date. On 8/26/24 at 4:05 pm, Staff A, LPN, MDS Coordinator stated she had opened a quarterly assessment and it would be completed by the end of the day. On 8/28/24 at 9:18 am, the Regional Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to administer medication in a timely manner for 1 of 18 residents reviewed (Resident #50). The facility reported a census of 87. Findings Include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #50, dated 6/3/24, documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) identified the presence of short and long-term memory impairment. The MDS documented that the resident had short-term, and long-term memory loss. The MDS documented diagnoses that included: renal insufficiency, hypertension, aphasia, quadriplegia, seizure disorder, anxiety disorder, depression, and respiratory failure. It further documented her gastrostomy status, muscle contractures, and dysphagia. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) of Resident #50 for the month of August, 2024, documented an order of Simethicone (medication for excess gas) oral tablet 80mg, and Levetiracetam (anti-seizure medication) oral solution 5ml, via Gastric Tube (G-Tube) two times a day, at 05:00 AM and 03:00 PM. During observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide routine scheduled baths for 1 of 21 residents reviewed (Resident #35). The facility reported a census of 87 residents. Findings include: On 8/25/22024 at 11:32 AM, Resident #35 admitted she had received two baths since she was admitted to the facility. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of heart failure, hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, cardiogenic shock (lack of blood and oxygen to organs caused by heart failure), prosthetic heart valve, and shortness of breath. It indicated the resident required set-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene, moderate assistance with toileting, bathing, upper body dressing and personal hygiene, and maximal assistance with lower body dressing and footwear. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) Activities of Daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders to obtain a resident's daily weight and twice daily oxygen saturation for 1 of 21 (#35) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 87 residents. Findings Include: On 8/25/24 at 11:42 AM, the resident was observed with bilateral, swollen ankles. The resident stated she had heart problems. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of heart failure, hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, cardiogenic shock (lack of blood and oxygen to organs caused by heart failure), prosthetic heart valve, and shortness of breath. It indicated the resident required set-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene, moderate assistance with toileting, bathing, upper body dressing and personal hygiene, and maximal assistance with lower body dressing and footwear. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on direct observation, staff interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to perform a gastric tube (G-Tube) feeding in a manner that protects residents from cross-contamination for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #24, #50). In addition, the facility failed to serve meals in a manner that protects residents from cross-contamination. The facility reported a census of 87. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #50, dated 06/03/24, documented the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating the resident was incapable of completing a BIMS interview. It documented relevant diagnoses of renal insufficiency, hypertension, aphasia, quadriplegia, seizure disorder, anxiety disorder, depression, respiratory failure. It further documented her gastrostomy status, muscle contractures, and dysphagia. A continuous direct observation of the gastric tube (G-tube) feeding process on 8/26/24 starting at 3:07 PM and ending at 3:57 PM, revealed that Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse, performed G-tube cares with soiled gloves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent a male resident (Resident #1) from inappropriately kissing a female resident (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Finding include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) with an assessment date 5/15/24, documented Resident#1 had diagnoses which include, heart failure, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, depression, insomnia and alcohol abuse. The MDS documented Resident #1 with adequate hearing and was able to be understood and understand others. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BINS) documented a score of 13 which indicated no cognitive impairments and that the resident was independent with ambulation in the facility. The Plan of Care with an imitated date of 6/7/24, had a problem identified as follows; I display inappropriate/disruptive behaviors while in the dining room at meal times, and on 6/21/24, due to my inappropriate interaction with a female…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to supervise a male resident (Resident #1) with known sexual behaviors from inappropriately kissing a female resident (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Date Set (MDS) with an assessment date 5/15/24, documented Resident #1 with diagnosis for which include, heart failure, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, depression, insomnia and alcohol abuse. The MDS documented Resident #1 with adequate hearing and was able to be understood and understands others. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BINS) documented a score of 13 for which indicated no cognitive impairments and that the resident was independent in ambulation in the facility. The Plan of Care with an imitated date of 6/7/24, had a problem identified that, I display inappropriate/disruptive behaviors while in the dining room at meal times, and on 6/21/24, due to my inappropriate interaction with a female resident, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, policy review, document review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive water management program and identify areas or devices in the building to reduce the risk and prevent the growth of Legionella or other waterborne pathogens. The facility also failed to evaluate where hazardous conditions may occur in the water systems and implement measures to prevent waterborne pathogens for 1 of 78 residents. Need universe The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: The Infection Prevention and Control Program policy, revised October 2018, states an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) is established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Review of Resident #80's Care Plan, initiated 12/20/23, indicated the resident was treated for Legionnaires' Disease related to Legionella bacteria. Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews, call light log review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to answer the residents' call light in less than 15 minutes for 25% of the reviewed time period. The facility reported a census 78 residents. Findings include: On 2/19/24 at 10:12 am, Resident #39 reported she has waited up to an hour to receive cares when ringing her call light. On 2/19/24 at 10:16 am, Resident #22 reported call light times can be half an hour long. On 2/19/23 at 11:29 am, Resident #45 reported call light response time varies but it can be half an hour wait when staff is busy. A Call Light Report was requested for 5 rooms, which housed 9 patients, for a 4 day time period from 2/7/24 - 2/10/24. There were 59 call lights on the call log. Of the 59 calls, 15 of them took 18 minutes or longer to be answered, equaling 25% of the reviewed call lights. The longest call light time was documented as being turned on at 7:55 pm and not being answered until 9:50 pm, one hour and 55 minutes later. The facility document Answering the Call Light, revision date March 2021…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide food served by a method to maintain a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility reported a census of 78. Findings include: On 2/21/24 at 7:40 AM, Staff E, Cook, began serving breakfast to dining room residents. At the beginning of meal service, the temperatures of the foods were as follows: a) Pureed eggs - 190° b) Pureed toast - 209° c) Scrambled eggs - 170° d) Fried eggs - 167° e) Cream of Wheat - 190° At 7:49 AM, the first resident room tray, Tray #1, was plated and placed on the top shelf of a transport rack. At 7:59 AM, the last resident room tray was placed on the transport rack. At 8:00 AM, Staff E rechecked the fried egg temperature on Tray #1 and noted it was 109°. The tray was sent to the resident. At 8:07 AM, Staff F, Cook, rechecked a separate resident's milk temperature on another transport rack and noted it was 43.7°. The milk was replaced and the tray was sent to the resident's room. At 8:25 AM, the pureed and scrambled eggs' temperatures were taken and were 122° and 123.3°,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide alternative food options for residents who refuse the food served. The facility reported a census of 78. Findings include: On 2/19/24 at 10:45 AM, Resident #48 stated there were no food choices for residents who didn't like what was being served. An observation at 6:25 AM revealed the menu did not have an alternative breakfast option for the week. On 2/21/24 at 6:37 AM, Staff G, Cook, stated there were no alternative options for breakfast. On 2/22/24 at 1:30 PM, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated the breakfast menu normally did not include an alternate but residents could request something different and it would be prepared. She stated the residents most likely had not been officially informed of that. On 2/26/24 at 8:00 AM, the Administrator stated residents are always welcome to request alternatives for all meals. A policy titled Resident Food Preferences and revised 7/2017 indicated if the resident refuses or is unhappy with his or her diet, the staff will create a care plan that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, facility record review, and the facilities admission Agreement, the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of the personal property against one resident (Resident #15). The facility also failed to maintain proper maintenance to resident rooms to promote a homelike environment. The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #15, dated 11/18/23, identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. On 2/19/24 at 11:09 am, Resident #15 reported during a room change a few months prior, a personal blanket was lost and was never found. She stated the blanket was hand made for her by her daughter and it was labeled with her name. She stated it was her cancer blanket. On 2/20/24 at 10:45 am, the laundry room was toured and the blanket was looked for in the lost and found area. Staff D, Laundry Supervisor reported she was aware of the missing blanket and had looked for it before but it had not been found.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive Care Plan for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (#58). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: 1. On 2/19/24 at 12:07 PM, Resident #58 was observed struggling to drink a glass of liquid in the dining room. On 2/19/24 at 1:55 PM, Resident #58's relative stated the resident had a functional ability decline. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 had diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction (blocked blood supply to the brain), hemiplegia affecting the left nondominant side, lack of coordination, slurred speech, and difficulty walking. The MDS did not identify a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score, but the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified his BIMS score of 11 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS also indicated the resident was a set-up assist with eating and oral and personal hygiene but was dependent with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to fully review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 2 of 5 residents reviewed (#34 & #58). The facility reported a census of 78. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #34 revealed a diagnoses of Atrial Fibrillation (A-Fib), Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), Arthritis, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Diabetes mellitus, Trochanteric Bursitis - Left Hip with pain, Morbid Obesity, and the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which suggested a moderate cognitive impairment. The Care Plan dated 12/19/2023 for Resident #34 lacked documentation for oxygen therapy. During an observation on 2/19/24 at 11:14 AM, Resident #34 was in bed receiving 4 liters oxygen by nasal cannula with a water bubbler humidifier attached. During an observation on 2/20/24 at 10:41 AM, Resident #34 was in bed receiving 2.5 liters oxygen by nasal cannula with a water bubbler humidifier…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement physician's orders for 2 of 26 residents (Resident #34 & #80). The facility failed to document the physician order for oxygen therapy for Resident #34 and later titrated oxygen without a physician's order. The facility reported a census of 78. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #34 revealed a diagnoses of Atrial Fibrillation (A-Fib), Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), Arthritis, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Diabetes mellitus, Trochanteric Bursitis - Left Hip with pain, Morbid Obesity, and the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which suggested a moderate cognitive impairment. The Care Plan dated 12/19/2023 for Resident #34 lacked documentation for oxygen therapy. During an observation on 2/19/24 at 11:14 AM, Resident #34 was in bed receiving 4 liters oxygen by nasal cannula with a water bubbler humidifier attached. During an observation on 2/20/24 at 10:41 AM, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative activities in order to maintain a functional range of motion and prevent a decline in activities of daily living for 2 of 2 residents (#48 and #58). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: 1. On 2/19/24 at 12:07 PM, Resident #58 was observed struggling to drink a glass of liquid in the dining room. On 2/19/24 at 1:55 PM, Resident #58's relative stated the resident had a functional ability decline. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 had diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction (blocked blood supply to the brain), hemiplegia affecting the left nondominant side, lack of coordination, slurred speech, and difficulty walking. The MDS did not identify a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score, but the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified his BIMS of 11 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS also indicated the resident was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure call lights were responded to in a timely manner at no greater than 15 minutes for 5 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #6, #7, #8, #9 and #10). The facility reported census was 82. Findings include: 1. According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 5/31/23, Resident #6 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating an intact cognitive status. Resident #6 required extensive assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #6's diagnosis included congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. During a continuous observation on 8/23/23 at 5:40 p.m. noted call light had been activated. At 6:02 p.m. observed call light remained activated. Entered Resident #6's room and inquired what he needed. Resident #6 stated he needed some fresh ice water and his urinal emptied. At 6:18 p.m., 38 minutes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable environment for their residents. The facility reported census as 82 residents. Findings include: 1. According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 6/14/23, Resident #8 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 indicating a mildly impaired status. Resident #8 was independent with transfers, mobility, toilet use and personal hygiene needs with limited assistance with toilet use. Resident #8's diagnosis included congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus and morbid obesity. In an observation and interview on 8/24/23 at 9:40 a.m. Resident #8 stated she had concerns with the housekeeping services. Resident #8 points towards her floor which was covered with various debris and spill stains. Resident #8 stated her floor had not been mopped for two weeks. Observation noted debris and spill stains on her floor and bedside table. The toilet bowl had visible feces and stain rings in it.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interview, and provider interview the facility failed to ensure physician orders are followed in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #5 #11). The facility reported census was 82. Findings include: 1. According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 6/5/23, Resident #5 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating an intact cognitive status. Resident #5 required extensive assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #5's diagnosis included congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, respiratory failure, atrial fibrilation and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. According to the Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], Resident #5's medication orders included Eliquis 5 milligrams to be given twice daily. The June 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the Eliquis 5 milligrams was transcribed in error to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff, family and resident interview, the facility failed to provide perineal cares of incontinent residents unable to carry out the activity independently for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #10, #11). The facility reported census was 82. Findings include: 1. According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 5/2/23, Resident #10 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 indicating mildly impaired cognitive status. Resident #10 required extensive assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #10's diagnosis included congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In an interview on 8/31/23 at 12:50 p.m Staff M, certified nurse aide, stated when she had came in this morning and went to room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident #10 was upset, stating he was left to lay in his own urine since 3:00 a.m. Resident #10 claimed to have activated his call light and no one came. Staff M…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, climatologist review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident accessing the courtyard was adequately supervised for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported census was 82. Findings include: According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 6/29/23, Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 indicating mildly impaired cognitive status. Resident #1 required extensive assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. The MDS documented the resident as independent with set up help for locomotion on and off the unit. Resident #1's diagnosis included multiple sclerosis, lupus and unspecified abdominal pain. The Care Plan revised on 9/14/22 documented Resident #1 required staff assist with her activities of daily living due to she is unable to transfer independently. The care plan directed staff that she used her wheelchair for mobility. The care plan lacked any interventions on locomotion, use of the court yard and if safe to be in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$34,450 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $34,450 — penalty dated 2023-09-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARE INITIATIVES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.7-1.7 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avoca Specialty CareAvoca, IA 1 of 5Correctionville Specialty CareCorrectionville, IA 1 of 5Crestview Specialty CareWest Branch, IA 1 of 5Heritage Specialty CareCedar Rapids, IA 1 of 5Kingsley Specialty CareKingsley, IA 1 of 5Ravenwood Specialty CareWaterloo, IA 1 of 5Westwood Specialty CareSioux City, IA 2 of 5Chariton Specialty CareChariton, IA 2 of 5Creston Specialty CareCreston, IA 2 of 5Dubuque Specialty CareDubuque, IA 2 of 5Lantern Park Specialty CareCoralville, IA 2 of 5New London Specialty CareNew London, IA 2 of 5Northcrest Specialty CareWaterloo, IA 2 of 5Northern Mahaska Specialty CareOskaloosa, IA 2 of 5Pinnacle Specialty CareCedar Falls, IA 2 of 5Southridge Specialty CareMarshalltown, IA 2 of 5Stratford Specialty CareStratford, IA 3 of 5Atlantic Specialty CareAtlantic, IA 3 of 5Centerville Specialty CareCenterville, IA 3 of 5Cherokee Specialty CareCherokee, IA 3 of 5Eldora Specialty CareEldora, IA 3 of 5Manly Specialty CareManly, IA 3 of 5Montezuma Specialty CareMontezuma, IA 3 of 5Odebolt Specialty CareOdebolt, IA 3 of 5Panora Specialty CarePanora, IA 3 of 5Ridgewood Specialty CareOttumwa, IA 3 of 5Southern Hills Specialty CareOsceola, IA 3 of 5West Ridge Specialty CareKnoxville, IA 4 of 5Bedford Specialty CareBedford, IA 4 of 5Belle Plaine Specialty CareBelle Plaine, IA 4 of 5Corning Specialty CareCorning, IA 4 of 5Corydon Specialty CareCorydon, IA 4 of 5Dunlap Specialty CareDunlap, IA 4 of 5Laporte City Specialty CareLa Porte City, IA 4 of 5Lyon Specialty CareRock Rapids, IA 4 of 5Oakwood Specialty CareAlbia, IA 5 of 5Fonda Specialty CareFonda, IA 5 of 5Lamoni Specialty CareLamoni, IA 5 of 5Mechanicsville Specialty CareMechanicsville, IA 5 of 5Sibley Specialty CareSibley, IA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CARE INITIATIVESOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2014
COMPUTERSHARE CORPORATE TRUST COMPANY, NAOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
BEAL, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2026
BOWEN, LANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
CAROTHERS, MARY JANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
CHILDS, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2023
CORLESS, PETERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
KREIN, KEITHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/29/2022
RUST, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
STURM, DENISEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
UPMEYER, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/29/2022
DIXON, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2016
DRAKE, EMILYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/04/2023
GILYARD, TANYAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/23/2025
KUHN, JERAMYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/25/2008
MCDYER, JESSICAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/22/2023
VOLM, JOHANNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2021
KERSCHNER, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/13/2023
MAHLER, CARLAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
WEI, SHIPENGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 14%Other / private 28%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$324per resident / day
operating cost
$9,845per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$342per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165345. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next