Chariton Specialty Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 33.9 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, physician, family and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide necessary assessment, treatment, and services to promote healing of skin injuries, prevent infection, and prevent additional skin damage. The facility failed to implement appropriate interventions with follow-up measures for wound care and physician notification. The facility failed to seek a higher level of care to provide treatment for the wounds that failed to heal. Resident #1 obtained a puncture to the left posterior calf identified on 6/1/23, progressed to a large venous ulceration that became infected with bacteria with purulent green drainage and a strong odor and the right lower leg wound became infected with bacteria as well. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of August 29, 2023 on September 13, 2023 at 1:15 P.M. The facility staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on September 13, 2023 by implementing the following actions: 1. Facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, provider interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders while administering medications through a feeding tube for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #38). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS indicated medical diagnosis of traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration. The MDS revealed the resident utilized a feeding tube.The Care Plan revealed a focus area dated 7/15/25 for tube feeding osmolyte 1.2 calorie. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following Physician Orders: Enteral Feed- dated 9/22/25- three times a day Flush feeding tube with at 60 ML of water before and after administration of medicationsThe January Medication Administration Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observations, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided therapy prescribed restorative nursing services to maintain a resident's ability to walk and transfer for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #20). The facility reported a census of 33.Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #20, dated 10/30/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which was indicative of a mild cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment revealed the resident utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility, required substantial/maximum assistance for transfers and had not attempted to walk during the assessment period. Resident #20 had diagnoses of stroke, abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and a history of falls. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #20, last revised 12/29/25, revealed the resident required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including an intervention for the assistance of one staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, food temperatures during food service and resident interview, the facility failed to serve food at an acceptable temperature during one of three meals sampled. The facility reported census was 40. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set for Resident #5 dated 8/18/25 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicating intact cognition.Observation on 9/18/25 at 12:30 p.m. a sample tray, consisting of a grilled cheeseburger, macaroni salad and potato salad was provided to this surveyor. The hamburger patty was served well done, at room temperature and with a slice of cold cheese on a bun. The macaroni salad and potato salad was served cold and had good flavor.In an interview on 9/18/25 at 10:50 a.m. Resident #5 stated the meals are often not very good and the facility does not always follow their menus.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a personalized Care Plan for 4 of 12 residents (#2, #7, #16, and #24) reviewed for Care Plans. The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Findings include: 1. On 1/27/25, a record review of Resident #2's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed she received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Bipolar Disorder, and depression. It also revealed the resident received antipsychotic (AP) and antidepressant (AD) medications during the last 7 days. The EHR included a physician's order for an antipsychotic medication, Quetiapine fumarate 100 milligrams (mg) by mouth at bedtime for Bipolar Disorder and an antidepressant medication, Trazadone hydrochloride…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, guidance from the 2022 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, and facility policy review, the facility failed to use proper sanitation and glove use during lunch service. The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Findings include: The facility's posted menu for lunch on 1/29/25 identified the menu to be: Pulled pork sandwich Broccoli Banana Cream Pie Continuous observation of lunch service began on 1/29/25 at 11:30 am. The Dietary Services Manager (DSM) first prepared pureed broccoli for the residents who required a pureed diet. After this task, the then stated she would puree the pulled pork. The DSM placed gloves on her hands. She picked up the food processor bowl and carried it to the counter. She placed four servings of pulled pork into the food processor bowl. She then obtained a measuring cup and added some barbeque sauce to it. She walked to the coffee maker and obtained hot water from the coffee maker and added it to the cup, still wearing the same gloves. After adding the water and sauce mixture to the pork, she picked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and instructions of CMS form 10123-NOMNC, the facility failed to appropriately provide a Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) to 2 of 3 (Resident #35 and #36) residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Findings include: 1. The census portion of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of Resident #35 revealed the resident began receiving skilled care under Medicare A payer source on 9/9/24 and Medicare continued to pay for her stay through 11/22/24. The facility was unable to provide documentation of Resident #35 receiving a Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) form. 2. The census portion of the EHR of Resident #36 revealed the resident began receiving skilled care under Medicare A payer source on 7/26/24 and Medicare paid for his stay through 9/11/24. The facility did provide Resident #36 a NOMNC form on 9/10/24, one day prior to his Medicare services ending. The document titled Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123 directed: A Medicare…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff interview, guidance from the 2024 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments following a significant change within federal guidelines for 1 of 5 residents (Res #4) reviewed for significant change. The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Findings include: The Census Line portion of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of Resident #4 documented the resident enrolled in hospice care on 9/12/24. The Significant Change MDS of Resident #4 documented an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/3/24. Page 58 of the MDS documented the MDS was signed as Assessment Completion on 10/8/24 which is 26 days following hospice admission. According to the 2024 RAI, a Significant Change (comprehensive) assessment, the ARD must be no later than the 14th calendar day after determination that a significant change in the resident's status occurred. The RAI stated a Significant Change MDS is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #7) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Findings include: On 1/27/25 at 9:42 AM, Resident #7 was observed lying in his room. The bottom half of the resident's legs were uncovered and noted to be discolored. The resident stated he was supposed to have tubigrips (a tubular bandage that provides support for sprains, strains, swelling, and other injuries) on the lower half of both legs. He stated they were to be applied in the morning and removed at night. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of Heart Failure (HF), Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Alzheimer's Disease, Schizoaffective Disorder, depression, left lower limb cellulitis, and erythematous condition (redness of the skin typically caused by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, facility menu review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow the posted menu and serve the appropriate portions for 3 of 3 residents who received pureed diets (Resident #9, #23, #29). Findings include: The facility's menu for lunch on 1/29/25 included the following items to be served to the residents. 2 oz of pulled pork 1 slice of bread 1/2 cup of broccoli 1 slice banana cream pie Continuous observation of lunch service began on 1/29/25 at 11:30 am. The Dietary Services Manager (DSM) stated she would first puree the broccoli for the puree diet residents. She used a #8 (4 oz) scoop and placed four servings of broccoli into a blender cup. She stated the facility had three residents who received pureed diets but she always made one extra serving. She then placed an unmeasured amount of chicken broth into the blender cup and blended the food to an appropriate texture. She transferred the broccoli into a steam pan with no measurement of the total volume (Measuring the volume of the entire product and dividing by the number of servings calculates the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices to prevent urinary tract infection (UTI) for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #26 and #21) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 32. Findings include: 1. On 1/28/25 at 9:20 AM, observed Resident #26 to have an indwelling urinary catheter. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms (enlarged prostate that affects urination), and age-related macular degeneration (eye condition that affects central vision). It also revealed he was independent with eating, required setup assistance with oral and toileting hygiene, moderate assistance with dressing and personal hygiene, and maximum assistance with bathing. It did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,134 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,134 — penalty dated 2023-09-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARE INITIATIVES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $377K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA