Odebolt Specialty Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 38 beds and averages 28.5 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, staff, family and hospital staff interview the facility failed to prevent an accident from occurring for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for wandering with cognitive impairments. The kitchen staff members left the main kitchen door propped open and unsupervised. Resident #1 self-propelled in to the kitchen, through the kitchen, through two more doors, which included the basement door where she fell down 13 concrete stairs in her wheelchair. A kitchen staff member heard someone yelling for help. She found Resident #1 at the bottom of the basement stairs with her wheelchair next to her. She alerted nursing staff. Staff provided first aide to the left side of her head until EMS arrived and transported her to the hospital. The facility reported a census of 29 residents. On July 10, 2024 at 10:25 AM the State Survey Agency informed the facility of the staff's failure to prevent an accident from occurring for a wandering, cognitive impaired resident created an Immediate Jeopardy situation resulting in the resident going through the kitchen and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to assess or treat a resident's wound as order by the physician to promote healing for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #10) for wound care. Resident #10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a stay in the hospital. On admission, she had a wound to her right lower leg that required treatment of a wound vacuum (vac) to promote healing. Since the time of her admission, the facility only assessed her right lower leg wound on the day of admission and the day of her discharge, 19 days later. The facility then only assessed the left leg wound on day after admission and the date of discharge, 18 days later. In addition, during that period, the facility did not complete Resident #10's dressings due to her being asleep, or the time of day, of the staff did not document the treatment. During an interview with the Wound Center provider, they described her wound as horrible when they saw her at the Wound Center with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-01-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, staff, resident, and family interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate oxygen therapy for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #9). Due to a diagnosis of congestive heart failure and a recent hospital stay that included Resident #9 requiring the use of a ventilator, she required the use of supplemental oxygen. The staff failed to monitor Resident #9 vital signs and the oxygen tank to ensure she received the proper amount of oxygen. When the staff went to help Resident #9 to lunch, they found her unresponsive with an oxygen saturation of 45% and an empty oxygen tank. While at the hospital, the staff found Resident #9 had anoxic brain injury (a type of brain injury caused by the deprivation of oxygen). The initial hospital transferred Resident #9 by life flight to a larger hospital, where she died a few days after admission. Findings include: Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Long Term Care (LTC) Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual and staff interview the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Significant Change in Condition Assessment (SCSA) for 1 of 12 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Findings include: Resident #3's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 required substantial /maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort. Helper lifts or holds the trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort) with upper and lower body dressing, partial/moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort. Helper lifts, holds or supports the trunk or limbs but provides less than half the effort) with bed mobility and with all transfers. The Progress Note dated 9/30/25 documented the Nurse Practitioner (NP) evaluated Resident #3 due to complaints of right heel pain. Resident #3 reported when she was getting up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Long Term Care (LTC) Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual the facility failed to represent an accurate picture of the resident's status during the observation period of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) by not accurately recording medication use for 3 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #2, #3, #1). The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE] revealed diagnoses of non-alzheimer's dementia and anxiety disorder. The MDS further revealed Resident #2 did not receive antianxiety medication during the 7 day look back period. A Physician Order dated 4/26/24 directed staff to administer Lorazepam (antianxiety medication) 0.25 milligrams (mg) two times a day for generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Resident #2 received Lorazepam twice a day during the 7 day look back period. On 3/10/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for (Resident #19 and Resident #28). The facility reported a census of 29 residents.Findings include: 1.Resident #28's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS identified Resident #28 was partial/moderate assistance with bed mobility, and transfers. Resident #28's MDS included diagnoses of depression, diabetes mellitus, and neurogenic bladder. A Physician Order dated 2/25/26 directed staff to apply Calmoseptine to buttocks topically twice a day. On 3/11/26 at 9:00 am observed Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) provided treatments to Resident #28's buttocks and abdomen area. When entering Resident #28's room, observed Staff A had a gown…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to represent an accurate picture of the resident's status during the observation period of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) by not accurately recording medication use for 3 of 3 residents reviewed, (Resident #24,#26, and #27). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE] revealed diagnoses of anxiety disorder, and non-Alzheimers dementia. The MDS further revealed Resident #26 received hypnotic medications for 7 of the 7 days during the look back period. Review of Resident #26's Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) page titled, Physician's Orders revealed no order for hypnotic medication. 2. Review of Resident #27's MDS dated [DATE] revealed diagnoses of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, stroke, and moderate intellectual disabilities. The MDS further revealed Resident #27 received anticoagulant medications for 7 of the 7 days during the look back period. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical document review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide a comprehensive care plan related to high risk medications for 2 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #26, and #27) . The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had diagnoses of anxiety disorder, and non-Alzheimers dementia. The MDS further revealed Resident #26 received antidepressant medications for 7 of the 7 days during the look back period. Review of the Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) page titled, Physicians Order revealed an order for Trazadone (antidepressant) 50mg tablet to be given 1 time daily. The page further revealed an order for Escitalopram (antidepressant) 10mg tablet to be given 1 time daily. Review of Resident #26's Care Plan with a revision date of 1/6/25 revealed no focus, goals, or interventions for antidepressant medications. 2. Review of Resident #27's MDS dated [DATE] revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide assessment and interventions necessary for the care and services, to maintain the residents' highest practical physical well- being for 1 of 14 residents reviewed (Resident #7). The facility failed to complete and document vital signs and nursing assessments after Resident #7 returned from the emergency room (ER) for chest pain. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, shortness of breath and chronic lung disease. A Progress Note dated 12/5/24 at 10:40 PM documented Resident #7 complained of chest pain and right arm pain. The note documented Resident #7's blood pressure was 85/55, pulse was 64 beats per minute and oxygen saturation (oxygen in the blood) was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent accident and injuries for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: Resident #5's Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS identified Resident #5 required partial/moderate assistance with bathing, bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. Resident #5's MDS included diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), heart failure (heart does not pump blood well), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus, non-alzheimer's dementia, and difficulty walking. The Care Plan with a target date of 5/12/25 revealed Resident #5 was at risk for falls and had a history of falls. The Care Plan directed the following interventions: - Encourage Resident #5 to use the call light for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheter care (Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS identified Resident #9 required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, transfers and toileting. The MDS revealed Resident #9 had an indwelling catheter and was occasionally incontinent of urine. Resident #9's MDS included diagnoses of neurogenic bladder (urinary bladder problems due to disease or injury to the central nervous system), pneumonia, diabetes mellitus, and hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting the right side. The Care Plan with a target date of 3/31/25 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to store and prepare food sanitary conditions. The facility identified a census of 30 residents. Findings included: The initial kitchen walkthrough on 3/11/24 at 9:40 AM revealed the following: 1. The bottom of the single door refrigerator, double door refrigerator, and double door refrigerator contained an accumulation of food debris and dried liquid. 2. The floor in the kitchen and dishwashing area contained a variety of scattered food debris and dried liquid. Areas of the kitchen floor found to be slippery or sticky. 3. Open shelving beneath the hot food and preparation table contained food debris and dried liquid. 4. Crusty, flaky lime like substance found in the following places: a. Around the handwashing sink b. On the paper towel dispenser c. On the ground by the handwashing sink and dishwashing area d. On the door and top of the dishwasher The Cleaning Schedule dated 3/11/24 identified staff signatures indicating they completed the cleaning tasks. The Sanitation policy revised October…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to represent an accurate picture of the resident's status during the observation period of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) by not completing a discharge assessment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #31). Findings include: The Discharge summary dated [DATE] at 1:40 PM reflected Resident #31 discharged home with a family member. Resident #31's clinical record lacked a complete discharge MDS assessment. On 3/13/24 at 2:23 PM Staff A, MDS Coordinator, verified Resident #31 didn't have a discharge MDS completed after she discharged on 12/3/23. Staff A expected a completed MDS assessment when Resident #31 discharged . On 3/13/24 at 2:27 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) reported she expected the MDS assessments be completed and turned in at the appropriate times. The MDS Completion and Submission Timelines policy revised July 2017 directed the Assessment Coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring that resident assessments…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,433 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-07-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARE INITIATIVES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $307K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA