Life Care Center of Boise

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 153 beds and averages 65.4 residents a day — about 43% occupied, or roughly 88 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2021-12-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, Incidents and Accidents (I&A) report review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse by other residents. This was true for 4 of 8 residents (#25, #30, #47 and #158) reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in harm to Resident #47 when staff failed to supervise Resident #2 and he touched her breasts with his hands. Deficient practice also placed Residents #25, #30, #47 and #158, and all other residents in the facility at risk of psychosocial harm and/or physical harm. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure, Protection of Residents: Reducing the Threat of Abuse and Neglect, revised 8/10/21, stated the facility practiced a hardline, zero-zero tolerance approach to resident abuse. The resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The policy defined the following: *Physical Abuse: including but not limited to hitting, slapping, punching,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2021-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, I&A report review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision of residents to prevent falls. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for falls. This resulted in harm to Resident #23 when she had multiple falls and fractured her wrist and shoulder. Findings include: The facility's Fall Management policy, dated 6/4/20, documented the facility ensured the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. Adequate supervision was defined as an intervention and means of mitigating the risk of accident. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including aftercare following a surgical procedure to repair a right femur (thigh bone) fracture, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (a type of epilepsy with multiple different types of seizures, intellectual development is usually…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R)34) reviewed for self-administration of medications out of a total sample of 20 had a self-administration assessment completed before medications were left at the resident's bedside. This had the potential for the resident to not take the correct medications per order with a potential for significant medication error.Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Administration of Medications, dated 2025, revealed, . 2. The Facility, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care team, should assess and determine, with respect to each resident, whether self-administration of medications is safe and clinically appropriate, based on the resident's functionality and health condition. 3. To ensure safe and appropriate self-administration, facility should educate residents to ensure that a resident is able to: 3.1 State the name, dose, strength, frequency, and purpose for use of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain and document urinary outputs as ordered for one of three residents (Resident (R) 42) reviewed for the management of indwelling urinary catheters out of a total sample of 20. Failure to obtain and document urinary output may result in delayed identification of complications such as urinary retention, dehydration, infection, or impaired kidney function.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Indwelling Urinary (Foley) Management, last revised 06/07/23, indicated, . The facility will ensure that residents admitted with a urinary catheter, or determined to need a urinary catheter for medical indication hill have the following areas addressed; . 4. Insertion, ongoing care and catheter removal protocols that adhere to professional standards of practice and infection prevent and control procedures . Additional care practices related to catheterization 1. Recognizing and assessing for complications and their causes and maintaining a record of catheter-related problems; 2.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, hospital record review, interview, review of recommendations from the Mayo Clinic website for Huntington's disease (https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/huntingtons-disease/diagnosis-treatment), review of the recommendations from the Huntington's Disease Society of America website (https://www.hdsa.org), and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure therapy orders and recommendations were completed for two of two residents (Residents (R)17 and R7) reviewed for rehabilitation out of a total sample of 20. This had the potential for both residents to decline in their mobility and range of motion (ROM).Findings include: Review of the Mayo Clinic recommendations revealed Huntington's Disease (HD) causes nerve cells in the brain to decay over time. The disease affects a person's movements, thinking ability, and mental health. The movement disorders may cause movements that cannot be controlled causing muscle rigidity, muscle contracture, and trouble with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' advance directive information was periodically reviewed with the residents and/or their representatives and was accurate. This was true for 5 of 14 residents (#2, #10, #12, #20 and #27) whose records were reviewed for advanced directives. This failed practice created the potential for harm if the residents' documented wishes were not accurate and up-to-date regarding their advance care planning. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, defines an Advance directive as a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State), relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (or POLST) paradigm form is a form designed to improve patient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to determine if they were safe to self-administer medication. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (#19) reviewed for self-administration of medication. This failure created the potential for adverse outcomes if Resident #19 self-administered inhaler medication inappropriately. Findings include: The facility's Self Administration of Medications policy, revised 5/10/10, stated the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) would assess each resident and determine whether self-administration of medications was safe and clinically appropriate, based on the resident's functionality and health condition. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive lung disease characterized by increasing breathlessness). An admission MDS assessment, dated 3/30/21, documented Resident #19 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to immediately notify the physician and the resident's representative when there was a significant change in a resident's condition. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #159) reviewed for notification of changes in condition. This deficient practice placed Resident #159 at risk of harm due to lack of physician involvement and lack of advocacy and support from her representative when she was unable to make decisions for herself due to decreased health status and level of consciousness. Findings include: The facility's policy entitled Changes in Resident's Condition or Status, reviewed 4/2/21, documented the facility would notify the resident, his/her primary care provider and resident/resident representative of changes in the resident's condition or status. Changes included deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications. This policy was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, review of grievances, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure grievances were responded to and investigated, and prompt corrective action was taken to resolve grievances. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #29) reviewed for grievances. This failure created the potential for psychosocial harm if residents' grievances were not acted upon. Findings include: The facility's Grievance policy, dated 8/7/21, documented the social services staff and/or Executive Director were responsible to maintain records of all grievances received, including a summary statement of the resident's grievance, the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the findings or conclusions including whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken, and the date the written decision was issued. They were to respond to an individual who expressed a concern and contact all parties with the outcome…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an investigation was conducted after an allegation of neglect was reported to a department director. This was true for 1 of 8 residents (#156) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure had the potential to place residents at increased risk for physical and/or psychosocial harm. Findings include: The facility's Protection of Residents: Reducing the Threat of Abuse & Neglect policy, undated, documented the facility would promptly and thoroughly investigate reports of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation and misappropriation of property. This policy was not followed. Resident #156 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage, often in the legs and feet), major depression, epilepsy, and anxiety disorder. Resident #156's annual MDS assessment, dated 11/5/21, documented she was cognitively intact.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for nursing assessment and monitoring of residents when their condition changed. This was true for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #159) reviewed for nursing care. This resulted in lack of care and services of Resident #159 when her cognitive status declined and she was unable to clear her lungs impeding her ability to breathe. Findings include: Resident #159 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (partial paralysis) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, essential hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage that can cause numbness, tingling, and pain). Resident #159's annual MDS assessment, dated 5/27/21, documented she was moderately cognitively impaired. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2020-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documents, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Infection Control policies and Infection Control Surveillance plan were reviewed annually by the Infection Control Committee, which had the potential to affect the 63 residents in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential of placing residents and staff at risk for infectious diseases. Findings include: The facility's Infection Control Plan, revised 3/2017, documented the Infection Control Surveillance Plan was reviewed at least annually and whenever significant changes occurred. The facility's Infection Control Policy Manual was reviewed. An Annual Review sheet located in the front of the manual was not dated or signed, it was left blank. On 2/20/20 at 4:00 PM and on 2/21/20 at 10:16 AM, the ICP said the annual review sheet was not signed. The ICP said the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meeting minutes should have also documented when the Infection Control policies were reviewed and they were not. On 2/21/20 at 12:56 PM, the RDCS said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID