Life Care Center of Treasure Valley

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 91.3 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-03-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, review of investigations and grievances, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain was effectively managed and treated in a respectful manner. This was true for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for pain management. Resident #40 was harmed when she felt publicly degraded when denied narcotic pain medication necessary to effectively manage her pain. Findings include: The facility's Pain Assessment and Management Policy, revised on 7/17/21, stated the purpose of the pain policy was to help residents attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being by proactively identifying, care planning, monitoring, and managing the resident's pain indicators. Based on record review, resident and staff interview, review of investigations, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed ensure a resident's pain was effectively managed and treated in a respectful manner. This was true for 1 of 6…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected resident's status. This was true for 5 of 19 residents (#4, #30, #34, #45, and #52) whose MDS assessments were reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if residents were not assessed and/or monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including congestive heart failure (heart does not pump blood as well as it should) and major depressive disorder. On 11/11/24, Resident #4's PASRR level I documented she had diagnoses of depressive disorders, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorders. The PASRR level I was to be forwarded to BLTC for further screening. On 11/21/24, Resident #4's PASRR Level II, documented diagnoses of bipolar, anxiety, and depression. Resident #4's PASRR level II was to be sent for further evaluation by a mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on incident and accident log review, record review and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident representatives were notified following resident fall with injury. This was true to 1 of 4 residents (Resident #211) whose records were reviewed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm or adverse outcomes if the residents' representatives were not notified of resident injuries. Findings include: Resident #211 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia and history of falls. On 6/23/25, reviewed documentation in the facility incident and accident log of a resident who fell with resulting injury to her elbow on 4/1/23, and resident representative had not been notified of the fall or injury. On 6/26/25 at 11:45 AM, the DON stated the facility failed to notify the family/POA of the resident's fall with injury.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on incident and accident log review, record review and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident specific discharge paperwork was provided to the hospital during transfer to the hospital. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #211) whose records were reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential for harm if resident required health information was not provided to the hospital. Findings include: Resident #211 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia and history of falls. On 6/23/25, reviewed documentation in the facility incident and accident log of resident who fell on 4/1/23, with resulting nasal fracture, two black eyes, and a facial laceration and no documentation the facility sent resident required information (hospice) to the hospital during transfer. On 6/26/25 at 11:45 AM, the DON stated the facility failed to send resident information to the hospital when she was transported to the hospital.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to incorporate PASRR recommendations in MDS assessment and care planning. This was true for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for Level I and II PASRR evaluations. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if resident's specialized services for mental health needs were not incorporated in their care. Findings include: The facility's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) policy dated 10/6/22, documented recommendations from PASRR Level II determination and PASRR evaluation report are to be incorporated into the person-centered care plan as well as in transitions of care. As part of the PASRR process, the facility is required to notify the appropriate state mental health authority or state intellectual disability authority when a resident with a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual disability (ID) has a significant change in their physical or mental condition. This will ensure that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow current physician oxygen orders. This was true for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #26) whose care plans were reviewed. This placed residents at risk of adverse outcomes if care and services had been provided that were not ordered by the physician. Findings include: Resident #26 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (refers to the lungs' inability to adequately oxygenate the blood (hypoxia) over an extended period, typically due to underlying chronic lung conditions) and diabetes. Resident #26's physician's order dated 9/11/24, documented oxygen at 2 liters/minutes continuously via nasal cannula and obtain oxygen sats every shift. Resident #26's care plan documented oxygen settings via nasal prongs, liters per current MD/NP orders. Resident #26's TAR for the month of June 2025, documented oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses performed tasks which they had the knowledge, skills, and competencies. This was true for 7 of 28 licensed nurses. This had the potential for adverse effects to all residents when skin related issues were missed during assessments. Findings include: The facility's Skin Integrity and Pressure Ulcer/Injury Prevention policy dated 7/9/24, documented a skin assessment/inspection should be performed weekly by a nurse. Skin observations also occur throughout points of care provided by CNAs during ADL care (bathing, dressing, incontinent care, etc). Any changes or open areas are reported to the Nurse. CNAs will also report to the nurse if topical dressing is identified as soiled, saturated, or dislodged. Nurse will complete further inspection/assessment and provide treatment if needed. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic heart failure and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
  Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on review of the staffing schedules, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure full-time employees working as an NA were either in a State approved training and competency evaluation program or had recently and successfully completed such a program. This was true for 3 of 12 NAs (NA #1, #2, and #3) whose personnel files were reviewed. This failure had the potential to result in negative outcomes for all residents living in the facility. Findings include: NA #1 was hired on 1/2/25 and had not obtained their CNA certification and was not enrolled in a CNA program as of 6/23/25. NA #2 was hired on 8/28/24 and had not obtained their CNA certification as of 6/23/25. NA #3 was hired on 4/3/24 and had not obtained their CNA certification as of 6/23/25. On 6/25/25 at 2:35 PM, the DON stated NA #1, #2, and #3 had not yet obtained their CNA certification and should have.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 2 of 2 medication carts audited. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility. Findings include: On 6/24/25 at 9:08 AM, during 300-Wing medication cart audit, observed the narcotic accountability record dated 6/1/25 to 6/24/25, with 6 licensed nurse signatures not documented. On 6/24/25 at 11:12 AM, the DON stated two nurses should have signed the narcotic accountability record when they accepted the medication cart or released the medication cart. On 6/25/25 at 2:04 PM, during A-Wing medication cart audit, observed the narcotic accountability record dated 6/1/25 to 6/25/25, with 5 licensed nurse signatures not documented. On 6/25/25 at 2:05 PM, RN #1 stated two nurses should have signed the narcotic accountability record when they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the State Operations Manual, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and kept secure, and biologicals were labeled when opened. This was true for the facility. These deficient practices created the potential for theft and/or diversion and use of expired biologicals. Findings include: The State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, updated [DATE], Schedule II-V medications must be maintained in separately locked, permanently affixed compartments. 1. The following was observed for unlocked medication cart. On [DATE] at 9:17 AM, observed 300-Wing medication cart had been left unlocked and unattended by the medication nurse. On [DATE] at 9:20 AM, LPN #1 stated the medication cart should have been locked and had not been. On [DATE] at 3:10 PM, the DON stated the medication cart should have been locked when the medication nurse walks away from the cart. 2. The following was observed for controlled medications. On [DATE] at 2:10 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to appropriately store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to put residents who consume thickened liquids at risk for potential contamination and adverse health outcomes including contracting food-borne illnesses. Findings include: Facility policy, Resident Dining Services revised 4/29/25, documented the facility must store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. On 6/23/25 at 11:40 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, the following was observed with the Food Service Manager present: - In the dry storage room, were 8 cartons of Lemon-flavored thickened water with expiration dates of April 2025. On 6/23/25 at 11:42 AM, the Food Service Manager stated the Lemon-flavored thicken water was expired and should have been discarded.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID