No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Life Care Center of Sandpoint

1125 North Division Avenue, Sandpoint, ID 83864 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 124 certified beds · (208) 265-9299 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (208) 265-9299 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 38 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1309 Ponderosa Dr · (208) 263-9545 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
624 Larch St · (208) 597-7466 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
624 Larch St · (208) 255-2417 · Call to confirm hours
Park
601 N Lincoln Ave · (208) 263-3613 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.9%15.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.1%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%1.2%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.7%15.1%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.0%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.5%16.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.0%16.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.1%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%3.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.7%22.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.9%20.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.3%86.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.8%17.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.1%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.221.171.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.961.661.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 134 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
83.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.48U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 83.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.4%CMS range 58.2–71.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.8–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge83.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge71.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.2%CMS range 2.6–9.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.74
RN hours/ resident / day
1.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.04
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
35.8%
Total nursing turnover
38.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 71.2 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 53 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-25)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was cleaned, the resident freezer was cleaned, and staff food was not stored with resident food. These deficiencies had the potential to affect the 71 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses. Findings include:1.FDA Food Code Section 3-303.12 Storage or Display of Food in Contact with Water or Ice, documented packaged food may not be stored in direct contact with ice or water if the food is subject to the entry of water because of the nature of its packaging, wrapping, or container or its positioning in the ice or water.FDA Food Code Section 4-602.11 Equipment Food-Contact Surfaces and Utensils, documented: (E) Surfaces of utensils and equipment contacting food that is not time/temperature control for food shall be cleaned: (4) In equipment such as ice bins . and enclosed components of equipment such as ice makers. (a) At a frequency specified by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, CDC guidance review, and interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment, and to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infection. Specifically the facility did not perform a facility wide testing for COVID 19 as advised by their local Health Department, personal protective equipment (PPE) was not don properly, hand hygiene was not performed during residents' cares, and medical equipment was not stored in a sanitary manner. Findings include:1.On 7/21/25 at 12:14 PM, the IP together with the DON present stated the facility had residents who tested positive for COVID-19. The IP stated Resident #6 and Resident #60 tested positive for COVID-19 on 7/12/25 and were placed on isolation. The DON stated Resident #6’s roommate and Resident #60’s roommate was informed of their COVID positive results and were encouraged to wear mask. The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were offered and/or administered the appropriate pneumococcal vaccine as indicated. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents' refusals to receive pneumococcal vaccinations were addressed each year. This was true for 5 of 5 residents (#3, #7, #8, #60 and #78) reviewed for pneumococcal immunizations. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of developing pneumococcal pneumonia a potentially life-threatening condition. Findings include:The facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine policy for Residents reviewed 7/8/25, documented the following:- Each resident is offered a pneumococcal immunization unless the immunization is medically contraindicated, or the resident has already been immunized.- The facility should re-address the refusal with the resident and/or resident representative each year to ensure they have not changed their decision. These conversations should be captured in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, CDC guidance and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure COVID vaccinations were offered, administered, and re-offered to the residents. This was true for 4 of 4 residents (#7, #8, #60 and #78) whose COVID vaccinations were reviewed. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of severe illness, hospitalization, and death due to SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus - the virus that cause the COVID-19 illness) and had the potential to all affect all residents in the facility. Findings include:The CDC website article titled: Staying Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines dated 6/6/25 and accessed on 7/30/25 documented:- Protection from COVID -19 vaccine decreases over time.- Immunity after COVID-19 infection decreases with time.-2024 -2025 vaccine is especially important if you:a. Never received a COVID-19 vaccine,b. Are ages 65 years and olderc. Are at high risk for severe COVID-19d. Are living in a long-term care facility.1. Resident #7 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity when eating in the dining room. This was true for 1 of 16 resident's (Resident #49) observed during dining observation. This deficient practice had the potential to cause psychosocial harm if the resident felt he was not as important as other residents, and physical harm if his nutritional needs were not met. Findings include: The facility's Dignity Policy, reviewed 9/26/24, documented a facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including right side paralysis following a stroke, diabetes, and dysphagia (a medical condition characterized by difficulty or discomfort in swallowing.) On 7/24/25 the following was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents had a homelike environment. This was true for 1 of 18 resident's (Resident #32) who were observed for homelike environment. Resident #32's room was observed to be soiled and unkept. This deficient practice created the potential for psychosocial harm if residents were not provided with the same homelike environment as other residents, and potential harm if the residents lived in unsanitary conditions. Findings include: The facility's Resident Belongings and Homelike Environment policy, reviewed 5/15/25, documented the resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Sanitary includes, but is not limited to, preventing the spread of disease-causing organisms by keeping resident care equipment clean and properly stored. Resident care equipment includes, but is not limited to, equipment used in the completion of the activities of daily living. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment included accurate information. This was true for 2 of 3 residents (#7 and #10) who were reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This deficient practice had the potential for negative consequences if residents were not monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include:The RAI Manual, revised 10/1/24, documented section A1500, PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review), was to be coded “Yes” when a PASRR level II screening determined a resident had a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability, or related condition. 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia, anxiety, and depression. Resident #10’s PASRR level II, dated 6/15/23, documented he had a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia with medication management. An Annual MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to refer residents with a diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for a re-evaluation and determination. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3), reviewed for PASRR level II evaluations. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if resident's specialized services for mental health needs were not evaluated by an appropriate state-designated authority. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), and anxiety.Resident #3's PASRR level I dated 6/14/23, documented she did not have any mental illnesses.An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented No Resident #3 did not have an MMI. No other PASRR's were found in Resident #3's medical record.On 7/23/25 at 3:42 PM, the ED stated Resident #3's PASRR level I was inaccurate and should have been updated when Resident #3 was admitted .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and observation it was determined the facility failed to update resident's care plans and provide care conferences. This was true for 2 of 18 residents (#6 and #11), whose care plans were reviewed for accuracy and care conference planning. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if a resident's care plan was not updated to reflect current medical conditions, or if their care plan was not discussed with residents or their representatives. Findings include: 1.Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including a brain injury with brain bleeding and right-side paralysis. On 7/21/25 at 2:35 PM, the DON and the IP verified Resident #6 tested positive for COVID-19 on 7/12/25. A review of Resident #6’s care plan did not document he had a respiratory infection. On 7/24/25 at 10:50 AM, in a joint interview with the DON and the ADON, they stated Resident #6’s care plan was not updated when he tested positive for COVID-19 on 7/12/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, Incident and Accident report, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident #35) reviewed for quality of care. These failed practices had the potential to adversely affect or harm residents whose care and services were not delivered according to accepted standards of clinical practices. Findings include:Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including diabetes, right hip fracture, and cognitive communication deficit.Resident #35's care plan documented she expressed pain related to chronic back pain, right hip fracture and impaired mobility; including a goal that resident will express pain relief.On 7/21/25 at 5:00 PM, Resident #35 stated she was in pain 99% of the time in her back and right hip, and pain medication was inconsistent with relief. Resident #35's physicians orders were as follows:-Administer 5 mg Oxycodone (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if respiratory care was not provided. Findings Include:Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dissection of thoracoabdominal aorta (a severe medical emergency characterized by a tear in the inner lining of the aorta, the main artery that carries blood from the heart through the chest and abdomen), asthma, and dementia. On 7/24/25 at 2:23 PM, it was observed with the RCM, Resident #8's humidifier reservoir was empty, his nebulizer tubing was not stored correctly, and his oxygen tubing was not dated. On 7/24/25 at 2:25 PM, the RCM stated oxygen tubing was replaced weekly, and should have been dated when it was changed. She also stated she was not sure when the humidifier reservoir had last been changed, but it was supposed to be monitored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure post dialysis assessments were completed and accurate. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #15) who received dialysis. This created the potential for Resident #15 for adverse outcomes such as blood loss and infection from the access site. Findings include:The facility's policy revised 3/18/20, documented the facility should provide immediate monitoring and documentation of the status of resident's access site upon return from the dialysis treatment to observe for bleeding or other complications such as redness or edema. Obtain vital signs of resident upon return from dialysis and complete the Pre/Post dialysis Communication Form.Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including Wegener's Granulomatosis (swelling also called inflammation of small blood vessels, mainly affecting the blood vessels in the nose, sinuses throat,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from significant medication errors. This was true for 3 of 7 residents (#9, #15, and #81) reviewed for medication errors. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents received the wrong dosage of medications. Findings include:The online Nursing 2025 Drug Handbook accessed on 7/30/25, stated the eight rights of medication administration were: - Right drug - Right patient - Right dose - Right time - Right route - Right reason - Right response - Right documentation 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including fracture of right femur, pain and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #9’s record documented a physician's order for Oxycodone (an opioid pain medication) with the following instructions: -Oxycodone 2.5 mg every 4 hours as needed for pain rated at (3-6/10) -Oxycodone 5 mg every 4 hours as needed for severe pain rated at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pharmacy labels matched the physician's order. This was true for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #15) whose medications administration was observed. This failure created the potential for harm should Resident #15 be administered the wrong dose of her medications. Findings include:On 7/24/25 at 7:39 AM, LPN #1 was observed as she administered one tablet of Sevelamer Carbonate to Resident #15. The Sevelamer Carbonate pharmacy label documented Sevelamer Carbonate 800 mgs two tablets before meals and at bedtime LPN #1 stated the physician's order was changed to administer one tablet of Sevelamer Carbonate to Resident #15. LPN #1 stated the label on the bottle should have been changed to match the physician's order.On 7/24/25 at 10:29 AM, the DON stated Resident #15's Sevelamer Carbonate order came from the dialysis center and Yes the label should have been changed to match the physician's order.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure accurate clinical records were maintained for each resident. This was true for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #42) whose record was reviewed. This deficient practice created the potential for Resident #42 to experience harm if she received inappropriate care and/or treatment. Findings include:The State Operations Manual Appendix PP issued 4/25/25 documented the facility must maintain medical records of each resident that are complete and accurate.Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive lung disease characterized by increasing breathlessness) and diabetesA physician's order included the following:- Insulin Glargine 100 units/ml, inject 30 units subcutaneously one time a day for diabetes, ordered 12/9/24.- Insulin Glargine 100 units/ml, inject 5 units subcutaneously at bedtime for diabetes, ordered 12/9/24.-If blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility job description review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was a qualified dietary manager. This failed practice created the potential to negatively affect all residents in the facility who ate food which was prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: The facility's Food Service Director - Certified Dietary Manager Job Description, dated 5/1716, stated the Education, Experience, and Licensure/Certifications as: must have completed a CDM or State-approved course in food services; must have a current certification as a Certified Dietary Manager in applicable state; must maintain an active certification in good standing throughout employment; must have one year experience in post-acute food service; and must have a minimum two years' supervisory experience. During an interview on 7/9/24 at 11:22 AM, DM stated she completed the coursework for certification but had not scheduled a time to take the test. During an interview on 7/9/24 at 2:40 PM, the Administrator stated the DM moved from the position of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed for safety to self-administer an over-the-counter supplement medication. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 32) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This failure created the potential for adverse outcomes if Resident #2 received too much or too little of the medication. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Self-administration of Medications, revised 8/29/23 stated .Each resident has the right to self-administer medications after the Interdisciplinary Team has assessed the resident and determined the resident can safely complete the task .If a resident expresses a desire to self-administer medications the DON, Interdisciplinary Team and resident physician must be notified before allowing the resident to self-administer the medication .This request will be documented in the Interdisciplinary Notes of the resident's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) had correct assessment information. This was true for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. This deficiency created the potential for residents to not have their care needs met due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung that blocks airflow and makes it hard to breathe), hearing loss, and hemiplegia and paraplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following a stroke. Quarterly MDS assessments, dated 3/11/24 and 6/10/24, documented Resident #24 had adequate hearing and clear speech. Resident #24's care plan, initiation date 2/15/23, included a focus for a communication problem related to Resident #24's chronic hearing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided toileting assistant and incontinence care. This was true for 1 of 1resident (Resident #44) reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure had the potential to lead to urinary tract infections, skin rashes, skin infections, pressure sores or increased incontinence. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), revised 2/12/24, stated, Residents will receive assistance as needed to complete activities of daily living (ADLs).A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain .grooming and personal .hygiene. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), scoliosis (curvature of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was an ongoing activity program designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for activities. This failure created the potential for harm if residents experienced boredom and lacked meaningful activities throughout the day. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Care of the Cognitively Impaired (Dementia Care), reviewed 8/22/23, stated, The facility will provide dementia treatment and services . Utilizing individualized, non-pharmacological approaches to care (e.g., purposeful and meaningful activities). Meaningful activities are those that address the resident's customary routines, interests, preferences, and choices to enhance the resident's wellbeing. The facility's policy titled, Person Centered Care Plan, reviewed 8/26/23, stated, The facility will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of a facility risk management report, and resident staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was followed to prevent accidents. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in the potential for more than minimal harm to Resident #24 when she was transfered and sustained increased pain to her left knee due to lack of adequate supervision during a transfer. Findings include: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following a stroke, pain in left knee, and chronic pain syndrome. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/21/23, documented Resident #24 required two person staff assistance for transfers. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 6/10/24, documented Resident #24 was cognitively intact. Resident #24's care plan for activities of daily living, documented Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's food preference was accommodated. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for dietary preferences. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents experienced dissatisfaction, hunger and/or weight loss from not having meal preferences accommodated. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Food Procurement, Diets, Menus, and Production, dated 12/2021, stated, Residents' preferences are followed to the extent possible in order to promote food acceptance; facility will provide as available, food to accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses, including aftercare following surgery for a shoulder joint prosthesis. An admission MDS assessment, dated 6/24/24, documented Resident #21 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 7/8/24 at 11:11 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, review of the 2017 FDA Food Code, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was maintained according to safe practices. This failed practice placed 19 of 19 residents (#3, #4, #18, #20, #29, #37, #38, #42, #43, #49, #50, #67, #68, #69, #74, #77, #80, #81, #85, #187, #191, and #192) who ate snacks or foods from the unit refrigerators and the 72 other residents who ate food from the refrigerators, at risk for adverse health outcomes. This failed practice increased residents' risk of developing food borne illnesses. Findings include: The 2017 FDA Food Code, Chapter 3, Part 3-5, Limitation of Growth of Organisms of Public Health Concern, subpart 3-501.12 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Slacking, documented, (A) Under refrigeration that maintains the food temperature at 5 C (41 F [Fahrenheit]) or less . On 3/28/19 at 5:21 PM, the long-term unit refrigerator was observed with food items such as thickened juice containers with use by dates of 3/3/19. There was also multiple butters and containers of half and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident care plans included their code status. This was true for 8 of 8 residents (#29, #42, #43, #67, #68, #69, #74, and #85) reviewed for care plan revision. This deficient practice had the potential for harm if resident wishes for end of life care were not honored. Findings include: A facility policy, dated 6/8/10, documented a DNR order is incorporated into the resident's care plan. This policy was not followed. a. Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (a potentially disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord) and diabetes. The physician orders and POST for Resident #42 documented her code status was Full Code (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). Resident #42's care plan documented advance directives were in effect. The care plan did not include her specific code status. b. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided assistance with bathing and toileting consistent with their needs. This was true for 4 of 9 residents (#20, #38, #74, and #81) reviewed for bathing. This practice created the potential for harm if the lack of assistance for personal hygiene and toileting led residents to experience embarrassment, isolation, decreased sense of self-worth, skin impairment, or otherwise compromise their physical and/or sense of psychosocial well-being. Findings include: The facility's Activities of Daily Living policy, dated 12/11/18, documented residents received assistance, as needed with ADLs. 1. Resident #74 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included pain, heart disease, fractured wrist, dementia, muscle weakness, and osteoporosis (fragile bones). A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 2/28/19, documented Resident #74 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-03-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, review of nurse staffing information, review of daily assignment sheets, policy review, review of resident appointment schedules, review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes, and review of the Facility Assessment, it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient numbers of staff were provided to meet the supervision, bathing, nutrition and hydration, and nursing oversight needs of residents. This deficient practice directly impacted 13 of 18 residents (#4, #20, #35, #38, #34, #39, #43, #46, #49, #50, #64, #74, and #81) reviewed for sufficient staffing and had the potential to negatively impact the other 78 residents residing in the facility. The deficient practice placed residents a) at risk of isolation, embarrassment, and health declines due to lack of consistent baths/showers and b) at risk of falls due to lack of supervision . Findings include: The facility's staffing policy, undated, documented the facility maintains adequate staffing on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were consistently implemented for hand hygiene during perineal care (peri-care) and wound care, equipment cleaning, and care of urinary catheters and reservoir (urine collection bag). This was true for 4 of 19 residents (#20, #37, #45, #56, #74) reviewed for infection prevention practices. These deficient practices created the potential for harm by exposing residents to the risk of infection and cross contamination. Findings include: 1. The facility's Infection Control Plan, revised on 3/2017, documented the facility followed the hand hygiene program according to the CDC hand hygiene guidelines. The CDC website, accessed on 4/3/19, documented hand hygiene should be performed as follows: * Before eating * Before and after having direct contact with a patient's intact skin (taking a pulse or blood pressure, performing physical examinations, lifting the patient in bed) * After contact with blood, body fluids or excretions, mucous membranes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' records included a copy of the residents' advance directive or there was documentation of their decision not to formulate an advance directive. This was true for 3 of 12 residents (#37, #38, and #74) reviewed for advance directive information. This failed practice created the potential for harm should the resident's wishes not be followed due to lack of direction and documentation in their record. Findings include: The facility's Advance Directive policy, undated, documented the following: * At admission, the facility's admissions director or designee would determine the need and knowledge of an advance directive with the resident and/or family. * If the resident chose to execute an advance directive, the interdisciplinary team assisted the resident to prepare an advance directive through discussions and receipt of the Advance Directive policy. * If an advance directive was executed, social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided personal privacy during a physical assessment. This was true for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #81) reviewed for privacy. This practice created the potential for psychosocial harm if residents experienced a lack of self-esteem and embarrassment due to disregard of personal privacy, and confidentiality during a physical assessment. Findings include: Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including palliative care, malignant neoplasm of the lung (a form of cancer of the lung), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that restricts breathing) and anxiety disorder. She also received hospice services. On 3/26/19 at 9:31 AM, the Hospice RN was observed sitting in front of Resident #81 in the dining room with Resident #56 and #74. The Hospice RN completed blood glucose testing, blood pressure, pulse, removed Resident #81's shoes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a safe, clean, homelike environment. This was true for 2 of 22 residents (#43 and #191) whose environment was observed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents were embarrassed by odors and dirty equipment and/or felt the lack of cleanliness was unacceptable, disrespectful, or undignified. Findings include: The facility's Scope of Services policy, revised 7/20/16, documented the facility provided an environment that was safe, comfortable, aesthetically pleasing, and physically conducive to meet the needs of all residents. 1. Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included ribs and right clavicle fractures and multiple sclerosis (a potentially disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord). A quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident #43 was incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure information was provided to the receiving hospital for emergent situations for 2 of 3 residents (#3 and #49) reviewed for transfers. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if the resident was not treated in a timely manner due to lack of information. Findings include: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system that affects movement). She was readmitted from the hospital on 3/7/19, for care related to the surgical repair of a left hip fracture. A discharge MDS assessment, dated 3/4/19, documented Resident #3 was discharged to a hospital. On 3/4/19 at 3:24 PM, a nursing progress note documented Resident #3 had a fall at 8:00 AM while trying to get out of bed. A new order was received to transport Resident #3 to the hospital, and her family was informed. Resident #3's record did not include documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of admission agreement paperwork, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure transfer notices were provided in writing to residents upon transfer. This was true for 3 of 3 residents (#3, #49, and #287) reviewed for transfers. This deficient practice had the potential for harm if residents were not made aware of or able to exercise their rights related to transfers. Findings include: The facility's Resident admission Agreement documented if a more immediate transfer or discharge is required due to urgent medical need a notice of transfer was given to the resident or their representative as much in advance as is practicable. 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease. She was readmitted from the hospital on 3/7/19, for care related to the surgical repair of a left hip fracture. A discharge MDS assessment, dated 3/4/19, documented Resident #3 was discharged to a hospital. On 3/4/19 at 3:24 PM, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bed-hold notice was provided to a resident and/or their representative upon transfer to the hospital. This was true for 3 of 3 residents (#3, #49, and #287) who were reviewed for transfers. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents were not informed of their right to return to their former bed/room at the facility within a specified time and may cause psychosocial distress if not informed they may be charged to reserve their bed/room. Findings include: The facility's Bed-Hold/Reservation of Room policy, revised 11/28/16, documented the following: * Bed-hold policies were provided and explained to the resident upon admission and before each temporary absence. * Before the resident transfers to a hospital, the facility provided written information to the resident or resident representative that specifies: a. The duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, hospice and facility agreement review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure comprehensive resident-centered care plans included delineation of care and responsibilities between hospice/palliative care agency and facility services. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #81) reviewed for hospice services. This failure created the potential for harm if residents were to receive inadequate or inappropriate care which negatively impacted the resident's quality of end-of-life care. Findings include: A hospice and facility agreement, dated 12/22/08, documented the hospice provider and the facility communicated with each other verbally weekly or at each hospice patient visit to ensure the needs of each hospice patient were addressed and met 24 hours a day. It further documented, this communication would be included in the patient's record. The contract was silent related to coordination and communication of palliative care services. Resident #81 was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, policy review, and Activity Calendar review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was a variety of activities scheduled to meet the needs of residents with cognitive impairment. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #74) reviewed for activities. This created the potential for residents to become bored and foster an increase in negative behaviors when not provided with meaningful engaging activities. Findings include: The facility's activity policy, undated, documented residents' activities should be meaningful and individualized according to their needs. The March 2019 Activity Calendar documented activities occurred seven days a week. The Activity Calendar documented the following activities: * Music activities: noon music, during the lunch hour, 7 days during the month and a music activity not during the lunch hour 4 days during the month. * Religious activities: 5 days during the month. * 1:1 activities: 21 days during the month. Resident #74 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided. This was true for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #74) reviewed for accidents and supervision. This failure had the potential for harm if residents sustained injuries from accidents and incidents. Findings include: Resident #74 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included pain, heart disease, fractured wrist, dementia, muscle weakness, and osteoporosis (fragile bones). Resident #74's care plan area addressing her ADL's, dated 7/21/17, documented Resident #74 required the assistance of one staff with bed mobility and toileting. The care plan documented Resident #74 was able to self-propel her wheelchair and she had back-up brakes on her wheelchair. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 2/28/19, documented Resident #74 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of one staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, policy review, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were consistently provided adequate nutritional and hydration interventions. This was true for 2 of 4 residents (#20 and #74) reviewed for weight loss and hydration concerns. This failure created the potential for harm if residents became dehydrated and they experienced unplanned weight loss. Findings include: The facility's Hydration and Nutrition policy, dated 11/26/18, documented adequate nutrition and hydration were offered to residents. The policy documented fluids were available to residents at all times. The policy documented residents were positioned properly at meals and snacks and assistance was provided as needed. 1. Resident #20 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diarrhea, vitamin D deficiency, and anorexia. Resident #20's care plan area addressing nutrition, dated 7/15/13, documented she required one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen therapy per physician orders, and failed to ensure staff changed, dated, and stored residents' oxygen tubing per facility policy. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#38 and #46) reviewed for oxygen therapy. This failure created the potential for harm if residents' respiratory needs were not met, and from respiratory infections due to the growth of pathogens (organisms that cause illness) in oxygen tubing. Findings include: The facility's oxygen policy, dated 12/3/19, documented the following: * The oxygen supplies were changed weekly and when visibly soiled, then labeled with the resident's name and dated when supplies were changed. * Regardless of water level, the humidifier aerosol bottles were dated and changed every 7 days. * Oxygen respiratory supplies were stored in a bag labeled with the resident's name when not in use. 1. Resident #38 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Garden Terrace At Overland ParkOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Hammond-Whiting Care CenterWhiting, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of AndoverAndover, KS 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Cape GirardeauCape Girardeau, MO 1 of 5Life Care Center Of GrayGray, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of HixsonHixson, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Mount VernonMount Vernon, WA 1 of 5Life Care Center Of RenoReno, NV 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Sierra VistaSierra Vista, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center Of The WillowsValparaiso, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of TucsonTucson, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center of Coeur d'AleneCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Life Care Center of ElkhornElkhorn, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of Hilton HeadHilton Head Island, SC 1 of 5Life Care Center of OmahaOmaha, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of PlainwellPlainwell, MI 1 of 5Life Care Ctr Of LawrencevilleLawrenceville, GA 1 of 5Rensselaer Care CenterRensselaer, IN 2 of 5Canon Lodge Care CenterCanon City, CO 2 of 5Darcy Hall Of Life CareWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Desert Cove Nursing CenterChandler, AZ 2 of 5Evergreen Nursing HomeAlamosa, CO 2 of 5Garden Terrace Healthcare Center of HoustonHouston, TX 2 of 5Hallmark ManorFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Lane House, TheCrawfordsville, IN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Altamonte SpringsAltamonte Springs, FL 2 of 5Life Care Center Of AthensAthens, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BridgetonBridgeton, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BrookfieldBrookfield, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ClevelandCleveland, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ColumbiaColumbia, SC 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Federal WayFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of GrandviewGrandview, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of KirklandKirkland, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Merrimack ValleyBillerica, MA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Morgan CountyWartburg, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of PuyallupPuyallup, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Red BankChattanooga, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of South Las VegasLas Vegas, NV

Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DEVELOPERS INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2017
PRESTON, FORRESTIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/1995
BUTNER, NANCYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/16/2018
ORCUTT, LORIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/23/2022
STIDMAN, CRYSTALIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/23/2024
LAY, LISAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/09/2018
SWANKER, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2022
CROSS, CINDYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/1998
HENRY, TERRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/16/1999
THURMOND, JOANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/22/2000
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1998
SANDPOINT MEDICAL INVESTORS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1998
FLETCHER, TODDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/13/2024
MEZA, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2025
PRESTON, AUBREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/13/2024
ZIEGLER, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/13/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 11%Other / private 36%

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$439per resident / day
operating cost
$13,334per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$404per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Idaho Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Idaho
$10,494/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,175/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 135127. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next