Bridgeview Estates

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 91.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 47.7 residents a day — about 41% occupied, or roughly 68 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2018-12-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to coordinate care to prevent the development of an avoidable pressure ulcer. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #29) who were reviewed for pressure ulcers. Staff failed to follow physician orders to remove a leg brace and to conduct skin assessments. This resulted in harm for Resident #29 when they developed a pressure ulcer which required skin grafting and a lengthy healing period. Findings include: Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included a right femur (thighbone) fracture. Resident #29's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], documented Upon arrival at new facility: Encourage up in Chair every 4-6 hrs [hours] or 3 times daily. Non-weight bearing right lower extremity. Work on bed to chair transfers. Remove brace for physical therapy. Resident #29's July 2018 MAR documented FYI: NWB (non-weight bearing) RLE [right lower extremity]. Encourage up in chair every 4-6 hours or 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, 2022 FDA Food Code, resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident meals were palatable and maintained their correct temperature. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who dined in the facility. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect residents' nutritional status and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: The 2022 FDA Food Code states hot food will be maintained at 135 degrees F (Fahrenheit) or above and cold food will be maintained at 41 degrees F or below. The following comments were obtained during resident interviews. On 7/6/25 at 2:45 PM, Resident #46 stated meals are cold, with over or undercooked vegs that are often tasteless and mushy. On 7/6/25 at 2:52 PM, Resident #34 stated food is always cold and horrible, poorly fixed. Turkey and rice in last night’s dinner was horrible and tasted old. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including Multiple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the Idaho Food Code, the facility failed to appropriately store, distribute, and label foods. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination and use of spoiled foods, and adverse health outcomes including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: The Idaho Food Code, revised February 2021, stated, 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking . refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5 C (41 F) or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1.On 7/6/25 at 10:11 AM, observed the following issues in the Walk-in Refrigerator. - a large container of cooked turkey in liquid, partially covered with plastic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were initially assessed to determine if they were safe to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #10). This failure created the potential for adverse effects if residents self-administered medications inappropriately. Findings include:Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including emphysema and anxiety. On 7/6/25 at 1:51 PM, observed in Resident #10's room [ROOM NUMBER] tubes of Cortisone-10 cream on her overbed table. Resident #10 stated she self-administers the medication when she needs it. Resident #10's medical record had not contained a self-administration assessment for the Cortisone-10 cream.On 7/8/25 at 2:15 PM, the DON stated Resident #10 should have been assessed for the Cortizone-10 cream to allow her to have it in her room to self-administer and was not.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #10) whose MDS, care plan, and nursing assessments were reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if residents were not assessed and cared for or monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include:Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including emphysema and anxiety. Review of Resident #10's Level I PASRR dated 10/6/23, and Level II PASRR dated 10/10/23, and noted PTSD was listed as a diagnosis. Review of Resident #10's MDS dated [DATE], 1/18/25, 10/18/24, 7/20/24, 4/19/24, 1/18/24, and 10/18/23 which documented under I6100 Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was marked NO.On 7/7/25 at 1:20 PM, the DON stated once PTSD is listed on the PASSR's it should have been documented in each MDS and was not.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #10) whose care plan was reviewed. This deficient practice of not developing and implementing care plans placed residents at risk to their health and wellbeing with negative outcomes if services were not provided or provided incorrectly. Findings include: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including emphysema and anxiety. Resident #10's comprehensive person-centered care plan had not documented PTSD diagnosis with goals and interventions.On 7/8/25 at 2:19 PM, the DON stated Resident #10's PTSD diagnosis should have been care planned and was not.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to update care plans when changes occur to resident's care. This was true for 2 of 14 residents (#12 and #34) whose care plans were reviewed. This placed residents at risk of adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided as resident's needs changed. Findings include:The facility's policy, Comprehensive Care Plans and Conferences dated 9/5/24, documented resident’s care plans must be reviewed after each assessment and revised based on changing goals, preferences, and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including COPD (a type of lung disease marked by permanent damage to tissues in the lungs, making it hard to breathe), congestive heart failure, and repeated falls. On 3/3/25, Resident #12 had a fall when his quad-cane bent during a transfer, resulting in a laceration and skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility standing orders, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow facility bowel care standing order of delivering specific medications when residents do not have BM within 72 hours for 3 of 4 Residents (#34, #41, and #43) who records were reviewed for bowel and bladder care. This failed practice created the potential for residents to experience discomfort when medications were not administered according to the physician's order. Findings include: The facility standing orders and protocols documented BM (Bowel Movement) Step 1: Lactulose 10GM/15ML: 30 ml PO daily PRN for no bowel movement X 72 hrs +. If no results within 8 hrs proceed to step 2: BM Step 2: Dulcolax Suppository 10mg: give one Suppos rectally PRN daily for NO BM X 72 Hrs +. If no results within 8hrs proceed to step 3. BM Step 3: Fleet Enema 7-19 GM/118 ml: Give one Enema rectally PRN daily for NO BM X 72 Hrs+. If no results within 8 hours Notify MD for further instructions. a. Resident #34 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory services as ordered by the physician. This was true for 2 of 5 residents (#34 and #43) whose records were reviewed for respiratory services. This failure created the potential for residents to experience increased fatigue and low oxygen levels. Findings include: a. Resident #34 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs cannot adequately oxygenate the blood, leading to dangerously low levels of oxygen in the body) and cellulitis of right lower limb (a bacterial infection affecting the skin and underlying tissues of the right leg, causing redness, swelling, pain, and warmth).On 7/6/25 at 2:52 PM, observed Resident #34 was not using his oxygen concentrator located in his room. Resident #34 stated he uses it when he feels he needs it.Resident #34's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility. Findings include:On 7/8/25 at 8:57 AM, during Sawtooth Hall medication cart audit, observed the narcotic accountability record, dated 5/3/25 to 7/8/25, with 3 licensed nurse signatures not documented. On 7/8/25 at 9:01 AM, LPN #1 stated two nurses should have signed the narcotic accountability record when they accepted the medication cart or released the medication cart. On 7/8/25 at 9:10 AM, during Sun Valley Hall medication cart audit, observed the narcotic accountability record, dated 5/28/25 to 7/8/25, with 5 licensed nurse signatures not documented. On 7/8/25 at 9:36 AM, RN #1 stated two nurses should have signed the narcotic accountability record when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents. This was true for 1 of 19 Residents (Resident #28). This failure created the potential for harm to a resident if they were to obtain medications which were left unattended and unsecured by staff. Findings include:The facility’s Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals policy revision date 8/1/24, documented the following: - the facility should ensure all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is not accessible by residents and visitors. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including spinal stenosis, lumbar region (condition where spaces narrow, putting pressure on the spinal cord and nerves) and diabetes. On 7/8/25 at 8:47 AM, the following was observed in Resident #28’s room; LPN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID