West Suburban Nursing & Rehab Center
311 Edgewater Drive, Bloomingdale, IL 60108 · For profit - Partnership · 259 certified beds · (630) 894-7400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Sep 2025
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $19,845 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-21)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.9% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.4% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 99.4% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.6% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 34.2% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.8% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.9% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 73.4% | 63.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 36.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.7% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.69 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.42 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 41.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 51% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.3%CMS range 26.3–55.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 5.5–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 41.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 37.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 4.3–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.44 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 259 beds and averages 216.4 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.73 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.46 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.88 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer residents to prevent injury.This failure resulted in R2 falling and hitting her head, being admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for days to monitor a possible subarachnoid hemorrhage, and experiencing ongoing dizziness, headache, low back pain, and left hip pain with left leg spasms. This applies to 3 of 6 residents (R2, R6 and R7) reviewed for resident safety in a sample of 7.The findings include:1. Face sheet, dated 4/20/26, shows R2's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, dementia, chronic kidney disease, obesity, sequelae of cerebral infarction, Diabetes Mellitus type 2, hypertension, kidney disease, dependence on renal dialysis, anxiety, and osteoarthritis. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 1/22/26, shows R2's cognition was intact and R2 required partial / moderate assistance from staff for tub/shower transfers as well as sit to stand transfers.Care plan, dated 2/9/26, shows R2 was at risk for falls related to atrial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-09-11 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed in a language and terminology they understood when a third-party vendor enrolled residents in a new Medicare Advantage plan at the facility. This situation resulted in R23 displaying psycho-social symptoms including emotional upset and crying when discussing the changes to his insurance he was not aware of. This applies to 3 of 17 residents (R1, R19, and R23) reviewed for changes to Medicare Advantage plans in the sample of 23. The findings include:1. On September 2, 2025, at 12:36 PM, R1 was sitting in his room. R1 said several weeks ago he signed up for a new insurance plan. R1 said, I didn't understand what I was signing up for. [V3] (SSD-Social Service Director) talked me into it. Then after I signed up for it, I found out I wouldn't be able to get my cancer medication and I was panicking because I need my medication. I didn't understand the new insurance would change what was covered. Then I had to just…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-09-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure a resident received routine and emergency dental services in a timely manner. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing severe pain and requiring a tooth extraction. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for dental services in the sample of 23.The findings include:On September 2, 2025, at 12:36 PM, R1 was sitting in his room. R1 had a piece of rolled up gauze in his mouth and said he had a tooth pulled on August 30, 2025. R1 said, I lost the filling back in May (2025) and have been telling so many people here that I needed to see the dentist, including [V3] (SSD-Social Service Director). I even called [V7] (Ombudsman) to help me because the pain has been so bad. When they finally got me to see the dentist, he wasn't able to replace the filling and my only choice was to have the tooth pulled. If only they would have let me see him sooner. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address a resident's grievances in a timely manner. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for grievances in a sample of 3.The findings include: R1's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, osteoarthritis, chronic kidney disease, cardiac pacemaker, abnormalities of gait & mobility, bipolar disorder, affective mood disorder, and peripheral vascular disease. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 04/13/26 showed R1 was cognitively intact. On 06/16/26 at 10:32 AM, R1 said he was waiting to hear about several things that he had filled out the grievance form. R1 said he had brought up concerns regarding his state ID (Identification), his community pass, and missing items since February 2026. R1 said when he would ask V3 (SSD/Social Services Director) about it, V3 would say it was being taken care of, but nothing was resolved. R1 said no one had explained to him why he was not permitted a community…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to schedule a follow up appointment with a recommended eye specialist for a resident experiencing blurry vision. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for appointments in a sample of 5. R1's face sheet showed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 1 diabetes with ketoacidosis, chronic kidney disease, lack of coordination, amputation of the left below-knee, anxiety, and depression. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 03/15/2026 showed R1's cognition was intact and required supervision to touch-assistance for activities of daily living.On 05/01/2026 at 11:20 AM, R1 said the eye doctor saw him at the facility on 04/13/2026 and referred him to the retinal specialist. R1 said his right eye is blurred, and that when he closes his left eye, all he can see is a blur. R1 said he spoke to the V3 (appointment scheduler) and no appointment has been made yet.R1's eye doctor encounter report dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bed hold information to residents who were transferred from the facility to hospitals.This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for transfers in a sample of 7.The findings include: 1. Petition for Involuntary / Judicial Admission, dated 2/26/26, shows R1 was involuntarily transferred to the hospital after displaying aggressive behavior toward a peer. Review of R1's clinical record failed to show a facility bed hold notification was provided to R1.On 4/21/26 at 3:39 PM, V13 (Registered Nurse) stated on 2/26/26 she transferred R1 to the hospital after he displayed aggressive behaviors. V13 stated she did not provide a bed hold notification to R1 due to attending to multiple emergencies at the time of transfer. 2. Progress notes, dated 3/30/26, shows R3 complained of not feeling well and called 911 to be transferred to the hospital. On 4/21/26 at 3:39 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated R3 did not receive a written copy of the facility bed hold policy but she verbally told R3 she could return to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe shower chair equipment at the facility to prevent resident injuries.This applies to 3 of 6 residents (R2, R6, R7) reviewed for resident injuries in a sample of 7. The findings include: Facility Daily roster dated 4/20/26 was highlighted with residents who receive bed baths. The roster shows 164 of the 220 residents in the facility received showers at the facility including R2-R7. 1. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 1/22/26, shows R2's cognition was intact and R2 required partial / moderate assistance from staff for tub/shower transfers as well as sit to stand transfers.Care plan, dated 2/9/26, shows R2 was at risk for falls.On 4/17/26 at 11:13 AM, R2 stated during transfer from a shower chair to her wheelchair with V6 (CNA - Certified Nursing Assistant), the shower chair moved backwards as she stood causing R2 to fall. R2 stated she asked V6 if both the shower chair and the wheelchairs were locked and V6 affirmed the locks were on both chairs. Facility incident note, dated 4/7/26, shows V6's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide toileting assistance to a resident dependent on staff for toileting. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R1 and R7) reviewed for toileting assistance in a sample of 12. The findings include:1. Review of R1's care plan shows R1's diagnoses include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting her left non-dominant side, anoxic brain damage, neuralgia and neuritis, depression, anxiety disorder, low back pain, weakness, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle wasting and atrophy. The care plan shows R1 requires a mechanical lift with two staff to assist for transfers. The care plan shows R1 was incontinent of bladder and R1 should be given the opportunity to use the toilet before and after meals, activities, laying down for naps, and at bedtime. R1 was to be toileted at regular intervals. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 12/8/25, shows R1 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for toileting, bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide transportation services for a resident requiring an appointment with a medical specialist.This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R127) reviewed for social services in a sample of 35.The findings include:On 11/23/2025, R127's family member (R128) said he was concerned about R127's general medical decline related to her abdominal mass that was found in June 2025. R127's family member said she missed her ordered oncology consultation appointment in July because the facility did not make proper arrangements. R127's family member said the facility informed him that her appointment was missed due to her insurance coverage. He said he then accompanied R127 to her rescheduled appointment on 8/28/2025. R127's family member said V21 (Oncologist/Physician) inquired why she did not follow-up sooner, as originally ordered. R127's family member said she was then referred to another specialist (gynecologist-oncologist) and now requires a biopsy to determine her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0551 — patternGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the failed to have documentation to show a resident's representative could legally make decisions regarding a resident's enrollment in a Medicare Advantage plan when a third-party vendor enrolled residents in a new Medicare Advantage plan at the facility.This applies to 8 of 17 residents (R6, R7, R10, R11, R12, R15, R16, and R18) reviewed for changes to Medicare Advantage plans in the sample of 23. Findings include: On September 2, 2025 at 10:02 AM, V1 (Administrator) said, Our company is working with [outside insurance vendor] and that vendor takes over Medicare and Medicaid. On September 2, 2025, at 11:04 AM, V3 (SSD-Social Service Director) said, The [outside insurance vendor] chosen by our company, goes into the long-term care buildings owned by our company and offers residents to change their Medicare coverage to the [outside insurance vendor's] Medicare Advantage Plan. The SSD has to do the first point of contact between the residents and the insurance representative.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from exploitation when the facility allowed an outside vendor to come into the facility and make unauthorized changes to cognitively impaired residents' Medicare Advantage plans. This applies to 3 of 17 residents (R5, R9, and R17) reviewed for changes to Medicare Advantage plans in the sample of 23.The findings include:On September 2, 2025 at 10:02 AM, V1 (Administrator) said, Our company is working with [outside insurance vendor] and that vendor takes over Medicare and Medicaid. On September 2, 2025, at 11:04 AM, V3 (SSD-Social Service Director) said, The [outside insurance vendor] chosen by our company, goes into the long-term care buildings owned by our company and offers residents to change their Medicare coverage to the [outside insurance vendor's] Medicare Advantage Plan. The SSD has to do the first point of contact between the residents and the insurance representative. My role was to say this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders to obtain an appointment for a neurology consult. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R19) reviewed for appointments in the sample of 23. The findings include:On September 9, 2025 at 10:35 AM, R19 was lying in bed in his room. R19 said he went to see his neurologist about leg weakness a few months ago and the physician said R19 should get a second opinion from another neurologist. R19 said he is still waiting to see the neurologist and facility staff said it could be as long as February 2026 before the facility staff can find R19 an appointment. R19 said, Maybe I'll just give up and not go by the time they find me someone to go to. I can't wait this long. My legs won't work by that time. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including, mononeuropathy of left lower limb, PVD (Peripheral Vascular Disease), hypertension, heart disease, spleen infarction,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident requesting to see an audiologist, received assistance to make an appointment to see an audiologist. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for audiology services in the sample of 23. The findings include:On September 2, 2025, at 12:36 PM, R1 was sitting in his room. R1 said he has been having a difficult time hearing and has been asking to see an audiologist for a long time. R1 continued to say he would be happy to go out in the community if he could see an audiologist sooner, but facility staff have not assisted him with making an appointment to see an audiologist. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, hypertension, anemia, insomnia, history of skin cancer, major depressive disorder, epilepsy, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, leukemia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assist a resident in discharge planning. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for discharge planning in the sample of 9. The findings include: On April 28, 2025 at 11:28 AM, R1 was sitting up in his wheelchair in his room. R1 stated he wants to move to a different facility to be closer to his family. R1 has talked with V11 Ombudsman and V4 Social Services (SS) about it, and nothing has been done. On April 28, 2025 at 8:51 AM, V11 Ombudsman stated, R1 wants to go to a different facility to be closer to his family. R1 has provided a list to the facility of facilities that are closer, and they still haven't done anything. R1 has asked about the progress and V4 SS told R1 that V4 has sent the referral packet but V4's not actually reaching out to the facilities. On April 28, 2025 at 10:06 AM, V4 SS stated, he did not have anyone actively discharging at the moment. V4 had sent a referral to another local skilled nursing facility (SNF)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were supervised in the dining area to prevent a resident to resident incident resulting in a fall for 2 of 4 residents (R3, R4) reviewed for supervision in the sample of 9. The findings include: The facility provided roster shows R3 and R4 reside in the memory care unit of the facility. R3's Care Plan shows she has a diagnosis of dementia and has a cognitive deficit with periods of disorientation. R3's 4/17/25 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment shows she has a cognitive impairment and has periods of confusion and forgetfulness. R4's Care Plan shows she has a diagnosis of dementia and has a cognitive deficit with periods of disorientation. R4's 2/6/25 MDS assessment shows she has a cognitive impairment and has periods of confusion and forgetfulness. A facility Resident to Resident Altercation reported completed by V7 (Registered Nurse/ RN) on 4/19/25, shows during the noon meal on 4/19/25, R3 was found lying on the floor of the dining room. The report shows when V7 spoke with R3, R3 indicated that another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from facility abuse. This applies to 2 of 7 residents (R5 and R7) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 11. The findings include: 1. Review of R7's care plan showed R7's diagnoses include anxiety disorder, dementia, depression, psychosis, cognitive communication disorder, bipolar disorder, toxic encephalopathy, and insomnia. Care plan, initiated [DATE] and revised [DATE], shows R7 hoards items related to his diagnoses of dementia including entering other resident rooms in search of items to hoard, rummaging through drawers/closets, and becoming angry and defensive when asked to remove items. The care plan also shows R7 had a history of abuse/neglect/exploitation/past trauma that may increase his susceptibility to abuse and neglect. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated [DATE], shows R7's cognition was moderately impaired. Review of R6's care plan show R6's diagnoses include depression, anxiety, alcohol use, cannabis use, suicidal ideation, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with transfers to bed and showers as scheduled for residents who require staff assistance for transfers and bathing. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R2, R3 and R8) reviewed for staffing in a sample of 11. The findings include: 1. Face sheet, dated 1/10/25, shows R2's diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, congestive heart failure, osteoarthritis, and muscle wasting. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 1/1/25, shows R2's cognition was intact and R2 was dependent on staff for bathing. Care plan, dated 5/27/22, shows R2 required extensive assistance and one person support from staff for bathing. On 1/9/25 at 11:58 AM, R2 stated, It's not fair! I deserve my shower! It's all I have. I don't get my shower if there isn't enough staff. I didn't have a shower last week. I don't know the last time I had a shower. I am a very clean person. Shower sheets, dated 11/1/24 to 1/10/25, showed R2 was only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with transfers to bed and showers as scheduled for residents who require staff assistance for transfers and bathing. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R2, R3 and R8) reviewed for staffing in a sample of 11. The findings include: 1. Face sheet, dated 1/10/25, shows R2's diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, congestive heart failure, osteoarthritis, and muscle wasting. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 1/1/25, shows R2's cognition was intact and R2 was dependent on staff for bathing. On 1/9/25 at 11:58 AM, R2 stated, It's not fair! I deserve my shower! It's all I have. I don't get my shower if there isn't enough staff. I didn't have a shower last week. I don't know the last time I had a shower. I am a very clean person. Shower sheets, dated 11/1/24 to 1/10/25, showed R2 was only offered 9 showers (11/8/24, 11/12/24 refused, 11/19/24, 11/22/24 refused, 11/26/24, 12/10/24 refused, 12/17/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food service pans, trays, and utensils were handled in a way to prevent cross-contamination. This applies to all 183 residents receiving food from the kitchen. The findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid form 671 dated 10/28/24 shows there are 188 residents residing in the facility. Facility provided list of residents who receive nutrition strictly via tube feedings dated 10/29/24 shows there are 5 residents that do not receive food from the kitchen. On 10/28/24 at 9:33 AM, V5 (Dietary Aide) said V10 (Food Service Director) was on vacation this week and would not be on site. On 10/28/24 at 9:35 AM, V4 (Dietary Aide) was wearing teal rubber gloves that extended up to his elbows. V4 was draining the water from the three-compartment sink. V4 was clearing food debris from the first sink which was a yellowish color from being soiled. As V4 removed food debris from the sink, V4 would transfer the food debris to the garbage can located next to the three-compartment sink. V4 continued to drain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of expired medications and failed to ensure the medication was refrigerated at the correct temperature for 9 of 35 residents (R175, R105, R152, R169, R46, R167, R156, R37 and R29) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 35. The findings include: On 10/29/24 at 9:24 AM, while checking the medication cart on the second floor of the facility with V14, Licensed Practical Nurse, a glucagon injection labeled for R105 with an expiration date of 5/2024, eye drops labeled for R167 with 8/11/24 written on it, artificial tears labeled for R156 with 7/22/24 written on it, artificial tears labeled for R37 with 5/28/24 written on it, and eye drops labeled for R29 with 8/1/24 written on it were found. V14 said the nurse writes the date eye drops are opened on the box and they are good for 30 days after being opened. On 10/29/24 at 09:31 AM, the medication refrigerator in the second-floor medication room was checked with V14. The temperature was confirmed with V14 to be 50 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pureed broccoli and pureed ham were free of particles and at a smooth consistency. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R172, R179, R155, R129) reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 35. The findings include: Facility provided list of residents on a pureed diet shows that R172, R179, R155, and R129 received a pureed diet. On 10/28/24 at 10:01 AM, V7 (Cook) was pureeing the broccoli for the noon meal. At 10:08 AM, V7 finished the pureed broccoli and it appeared to have some small chunks when finished. V7 did not test the pureed broccoli before placing it into a steam table pan to use at service. V7 was already finished pureeing the ham before this surveyor watched. On 10/28/24 at 1:12 PM, the facility provided test tray of pureed ham, pureed broccoli, and pureed stuffing was reviewed. The pureed ham had small chunks in it, prompting and requiring chewing. The pureed broccoli also had small chunks in it, prompting and requiring chewing. On 10/28/24 at 1:21 PM, V9 (Cook) said the ham could be a little…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for one of 35 residents (R146) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 35. The findings include: R146's admission Record dated October 28, 2024 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, adult failure to thrive, history of falling, weakness, difficulty in walking, and depression. On October 28, 2024 at 9:23 AM, R146 was observed in bed. R146 had a large lemon sized bump to her right forehead. The right side of R146's face was discolored from bruising. R146 was not able to reposition herself in bed and was nonverbal. R146's Care Plan initiated on July 4, 2024 shows R146 has poor sitting balance can cannot maintain and upright position when she is in a wheel chair. R146's Care Plan initiated on August 24, 2022 shows R146 requires an extensive assist of one person for bed mobility and is non ambulatory. R146's Fall Incident Report dated October 14, 2024 entered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to clarify orders following a missed appointment for a residents treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. This applies to 1 of 35 residents (R58) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 35. The findings include: R58's face sheet shows she is a [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including rheumatoid arthritis, COPD, anxiety, major depressive disorder and low back pain. On 10/28/24 at 9:30 AM, R58 was observed lying in bed. R58 said she was not doing well. R58 has Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and has pain in her hands, shoulder, and arms and she is not receiving treatment for her RA. R58 was taking injections and steroids for her RA. R58 missed her appointment in September due to transportation not showing up and she is supposed to have another appointment in November. R58 is receiving hydrocodone (pain medication) but still having pain. On 10/29/24 at 11:21 AM, V15 (RN-Registered Nurse) said R58 is alert and oriented, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 35 residents (R118) reviewed for vision aids received a pair of corrective eyeglasses, as prescribed, in the sample of 35. The findings include: On 10/28/24 at 10:39 AM, R118 said she saw the eye doctor and needs glasses, but she has not gotten them. R118 was not wearing eyeglasses. On 10/29/24 at 12:51 PM, V20, Social Services, said R118 saw the eye doctor on 6/17/24 and she has a prescription for eyeglasses. V20 said he has not given R118 a pair of glasses; they probably have not come in yet. V20 said they should follow up with the eye doctor to check on the status. On 10/30/24 at 10:53 AM, R118 said she still wants her eyeglasses, but she was never given the option to order glasses and she had an eye exam in June. R118 said no one has ever followed up with her, so she is not sure if her glasses were ordered. R118's Patient Encounter with the Doctor of Optometry dated 6/10/24 shows R118 received a prescription for eyeglasses. R118's current care plan provided by the facility shows, The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a protective dressing was in place for a resident with stage 3 sacral pressure ulcer. This applies to 1 of 9 residents (R152) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 35. The findings include: R152's face sheet shows he is a [AGE] year old male with diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, acquired absence of right leg above knee amputee, type 2 diabetes, PVD (peripheral vascular disease), end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and hypertensive heart disease. On 10/28/24 at 9:49 AM, R152 was observed lying in bed, his oatmeal spilled over his bedsheets. R152 has a right leg amputation and a gauze dressing to his left foot. V17 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) came in to the room to provide assistance. V17 pulled down R152 incontinent brief, an open area was observed to R152's sacrum without a dressing in place. R152's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk shows he is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. R152's face sheet shows he is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, acquired absence of right leg above knee amputee, type 2 diabetes, PVD (peripheral vascular disease), end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, hypertensive heart disease. On 10/28/24 at 9:49 AM, R152 was observed lying in bed, his oatmeal spilled over his bed sheets. R152 pressed his call light for assistance. R152 said it takes a while for staff to answer his call light. At 9:58 AM, this surveyor looked outside of R152's room, his call light was not alarming. R152 pressed his call light again and the light did not alarm outside of his room. This surveyor pressed the call light from bed 1, it alarmed outside. V17 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) entered the room and was notified R152's call light was not working. She said she will put in the book about his call light is not working. On 10/29/24 at 12:28 PM, R152 was lying in bed, he said no one has come to fix his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter collection bag and tubing was positioned in a manner to prevent infection for 2 of 5 residents (R30 and R49) reviewed for urinary catheters in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. On 10/28/24 at 09:58 AM, R30 was up in her electric wheelchair by the nurses station. R30's urinary catheter collection bag was hung on back of chair even with bladder. The catheter tubing went down from the resident and then back up into the collection bag. There was yellow cloudy urine in downward area of the tubing, unable to go up into the collection bag. R30 said she has had a perpetual urinary tract infection for years. R30's Care Plan shows R30 is at risk for complications related to suprapubic catheter use related to urogenic bladder with intervention of monitor position of drainage bag and keep below waist to ensure proper drainage. 2. On 10/28/24 at 11:52 AM, R49 was propelling himself in his wheelchair down the hallway towards his room. R49's urinary catheter tubing was dragging on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-06 · tag F0729 — widespreadVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Health Care Worker Registry was checked prior to hire to determine work eligibility for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs). This failure has the potential to affect all 183 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS-671) form completed by the facility on 12/4/23 shows the facility census was 183. On 12/6/23 at 8:32 AM, V19 (HR Director) said she was off work for a couple weeks recently and was not able to do the background checks which included the Healthcare worker registry check prior to hire for V21 and V22. V19 said the registry check for CNAs should be completed prior to hire as this determines work eligibility. Facility provided background checks for new hires show: V22 (CNA) was hired on 11/13/23 and the Healthcare Worker Registry was not checked until 11/21/23. V21 (CNA) was hired on 11/16/23 and the Healthcare Worker Registry was not checked until 11/21/23. On 12/6/23 at 10:30 AM, V19 checked in the computer system and verified that V22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status was assessed and accurately documented in the medical record upon readmission to the facility. This applies to 1 of 35 residents (R37) reviewed for advanced directives in the sample of 35. The findings include: R37's Face Sheet shows R37 was last admitted to the facility after hospitalization on 11/11/23 (original admission date 12/5/19) with diagnoses including Dementia, Sepsis and Metabolic Encephalopathy. This same document shows R37 has a code status of Full Code. R37's Physician's Order Sheet printed on 12/5/23 shows an order dated 11/11/23 states, Full Code. R37's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows a copy of R37's Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)/ POLST (Practitioner's Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) dated 11/26/2019, this form shows a marked box of Do Not Resuscitate. R37's undated care plan showing her last admission date of 11/11/23 states, I have requested to be a DNR with selective measures. On 12/6/23 at 9:05 AM V10 (Social Worker) stated, I know her DNR is in her chart- I don't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were completed and wound interventions were in place for residents with non-pressure wounds and failed to schedule transportation for a residents physician appointments for 3 of 35 (R24) (102) (R116) reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: 1. R24's electronic face sheet printed on 12/6/23 showed R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin of other sites with necrosis of muscle, unspecified open wound, left hip, infection following a procedure, other surgical site, Sequela. R24's physicians order sheet (POS) printed on 12/6/23 showed left hip lateral /distal cleanse with Hibiclens loose packing, iodoform calcium alginate foam dressing BID (twice daily) and prn (as needed) two times a day for wound care. Left hip distal cleanse with Hibiclens irrigate/ calcium alginate over wound, cover with super absorbent pad dressing daily BID and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with dysphagia was supervised during meals. The facility also failed to ensure a resident's call light was placed within his reach. This applies to 2 of 35 residents (R57, R28) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 35. 1. On 12/5/23 at 8:48 AM R57 was sitting up in bed in his room at the end of the hall, feeding himself breakfast. R57 had food particles all over his face, chest, and bedding. R57 stated he did not need any help and confirmed he was able to feed himself. No staff was present in R57's room or in the hallway. On 12/6/23 at 9:00 AM R57 was again seen feeding himself breakfast. R57 had scrambled eggs on his chest and chin and some on the floor next to his bed. V12 (CNA) was in another resident's room in the middle of the hall assisting that resident to eat. No other staff were present in the hallway. On 12/6/23 at 8:40 AM V12 stated, (R57) can feed himself , he needs a little set up but he feeds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor and record weights for a resident at risk for weight loss for 1 of 9 residents (R146) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 35. The findings include: R146's current care plan showed R146 was at risk for weight loss due to her diagnoses of dementia and depression. The plan showed R146's weight loss care plan/focus area was initiated on 8/12/22. The plan showed, Weigh the resident monthly or per facility protocol. The care plan showed no documentation of R146 refusing monthly weights prior to 11/17/23. R146's Weights and Vitals Summary record printed 12/5/23 showed R146 weighed 114 pounds (lbs.) on 7/2/23 and 101 lbs. on 8/26/23. The record showed no weight for R146 in August 2023 prior, to the weight documented on 8/26/23. This record showed R146 sustained a significant weight loss of 11.4% in 7 weeks. R146's discharge hospital record dated 8/21/23 showed R146 weighed 47.6 kilograms (104.7 lbs.). The record showed R146 was admitted to a local hospital, on 8/20/23, with diagnoses of diarrhea, syncope, and low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure unqualified staff did not operate a resident's enteral (tube) feeding pump for 1 of 6 residents (R154) reviewed for tube feeding management in the sample of 35. The findings include: R154's current care plan showed R154 had a gastrostomy tube in place and required enteral (tube) feedings for adequate nutrition and hydration. The care plan showed a nurse was responsible for turning the feeding pump off prior to resuming the infusion once cares were completed. The plan showed, The feeding tube will be utilized in compliance with current clinical standards of practice and services provided to prevent complications to the extent possible for the resident. On 12/4/23 at 9:46 AM, R154 was in bed. An enteral feeding pump was noted on a pole next to her bed. The pump was on, infusing enteral feeding via R154's gastrostomy tube, at 60 ml (milliliters) per hour. On 12/4/23 at 10:26 AM, V5 and V6 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) entered R154's room to provide cares. V5 CNA walked over to R154's feeding pump and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves during incontinence care to prevent cross contamination for 1 of 35 residents (R163) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 35. The findings include: On 12/04/23 at 10:31 AM, V15, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was providing incontinence care to R163. V15 used gloved hands to wipe stool from R163's frontal peri area then V15 rolled R163 to his right side and wiped his backside. V15 took the bottle of peri wash and sprayed R163's behind, removed his gloves and left the room (presumably to get more wipes). V15 did not perform hand hygiene before leaving or reentering R163's room. When V15 returned, he applied clean gloves and finished wiping the stool from R163's back side. Then using the same gloves, V15 rolled a clean pad and brief under R163. V15 removed the soiled pad and set it on the floor. V15 took the sheet and put it in a plastic bag with the pad then put a clean sheet over R163, adjusted his pillow and pulled him up in bed all with the same gloved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its change in condition policy by not reporting the psychotropic medication adverse effect (drowsiness) to the provider. This applies to 1 of 6 residents reviewed (R1) for psychotropic medications/overdose/adverse effects in a sample of 6. The findings include: R1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with severe cognitive impairment per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. Record review on Physician Order sheet (POS) and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 09/2023 document R1 was receiving Lasix 20 milligram (mg) daily, Mirtazapine 7.5 mg at bedtime, Sertraline 100 mg daily at 0900, Depakote 125 mg two times per day (0600 and 1800), Risperidone 2 mg two times per day (0800 and 2000, started on 5/18/23 and discontinued on 9/26/23), and Vistaril 25 mg two times per day (0900 and 1700). A review of the nursing Progress note dated 9/26/23, documented R1 was noted with a decline in condition, having episodes of lethargy. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner by not sitting down to feed residents for two of 34 residents (R45, R105) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 34. The findings include: On 6/12/23 at 12:02 PM, V7 (Escort) was standing in between R45 and R105. R45 and R105 were sitting in their chairs. V7 was feeding R45 and R105 while standing between them. On 6/14/23 at 9:45 AM, V8 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) said staff should always sit down while feeding a resident so it makes the resident comfortable and so the resident feels like they are getting the care they deserve. The facility's Dignity policy not dated shows, Staff will not stand to feed a resident. Residents are to have all aspects of their dignity maintained by staff regardless of the resident's cognitive level or ability to realize or understand what is being said or done by others.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the call light system was within reach for a resident when needing assist of staff for 1 resident (R42) reviewed for call lights within reach in a sample of 34. Findings include: R42's Face sheet printed on 6/12/23 showed R43's diagnoses which include: proximal atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic pain, weakness, difficulty in walking and unsteadiness on feet. R42's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/15/23 showed R42 is cognitively impaired, requires extensive two-person assistance for bed mobility and toileting, and is totally dependence needing two-person physical assist with transfers. On 06/12/23 at 10:44 AM, R42s's call light was not within her reach. It was instead tied on the left side bed rail. R42 lifted her left arm, bent it upward to reach the call cord but was unable to reach it. R42 said, Where is it? I can't reach it. 06/12/23 at 10:55 AM, V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant) CNA said if the call light is not in reach, she might need something and we can't help her if her call light is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance for two of nine residents (R106, R21) who require extensive assistance with ADL care in the sample of 34. The findings include: 1. R106's admission Record shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia, history of falling, traumatic brain injury, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and dementia. R106's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/4/23 shows he is not cognitively intact, requires extensive assistance with bed mobility, toilet use and personal hygiene, and is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 6/12/23 R106 was observed in the same spot in the dining room/activity room at various times from 10:23 AM-12:15 PM. At 12:15 PM, R106 was moved to the table for lunch. At 12:28 PM, R106 was done being fed lunch. R106 remained in the dining room/activity room until 1:40 PM. At 1:42 PM, V3 and V6 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistants)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to safely transfer and reposition a resident for two of six residents (R144, R21) reviewed for safety in the sample of 34. The findings include: 1. R144's admission Record shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, schizoaffective disorder, cognitive communication deficit, history of falling, unsteadiness on feet, weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. R144 MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/20/23 shows she is not cognitively intact and requires extensive assistance with bed mobility and transferring. R144's Fall Risk Review dated 4/18/23 shows she is a high risk for falls. R144's Care Plan initiated 7/31/22 shows, I may have fluctuations in my normal day to day ADL assistance and staff support needs due to my chronic disease process and/or any acute exacerbations. I may occasionally receive a two person assist with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. I am at risk for falls. Gait belt to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident at risk for weight loss received double portions as ordered for 1 of 34 residents (R373) reviewed for therapeutic diets in the sample of 34. The findings include: On 06/12/23 (Monday) at 12:20 PM, R373 was sitting at the dining room table. R373's dietary card showed double portions for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. R373's plate contained two separate portions of rice (about 1 cup) on the plate, one regular serving of pork (about 1/2 cup) with gravy, and a single portion size of vegetables (about 1/2 cup). R373 stated What's this? (Pointing to the pork) I'm not eating it. R373 ate all the rice, vegetables, and bread on the plate, but did not eat the pork. On 06/13/23 (Tuesday) at 12:16 PM, R373 was at lunch in the dining room. R373's dietary card showed double portions. R373 was served 2 chicken fried steaks, about 1/2 cup of cabbage, 3 small slices of potatoes, 2 pieces of bread, and one container of applesauce. R373's portions of cabbage and potatoes were noted to be same size as residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves in a manner to prevent cross contamination for three of 34 residents (R21, R32, R106) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 34. The findings include: 1. R21's admission Record shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, anorexia, Alzheimer's disease, history of falling, urinary tract infection, dementia, and need for assistance with personal care. R21's MDS dated [DATE] shows R21 is not cognitively intact, requires extensive assistance with bed mobility, transferring, toilet use, and personal hygiene. R21 is always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of stool. On 6/12/23 at 1:24 PM, V3 and V4 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) provided incontinence care to R21. There was urine in R21's incontinence brief. V3 wiped R21's front peri area, touched R21's body to turn her, placed a clean brief on, touched the bed control and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$19,845 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $19,845 — penalty dated 2026-04-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
The other 68 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 68; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A & F REALTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 11/01/2007 |
| A&F REALTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 11/01/2007 |
| GUBIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 38% | since 11/01/2013 |
| MORRIS, MARGAUX | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/14/2018 |
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145333. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.