No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Momence Meadows Nursing & Rehab

500 South Walnut, Momence, IL 60954 · For profit - Individual · 140 certified beds · (815) 472-2423 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0567)4 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 28% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3761 N State Route 1 17 · (815) 472-3923 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2764 N State Route 1 17 · (815) 472-3223 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
227 Gladiolus St · (815) 507-5110 · Call to confirm hours
Park
207 E River St · (815) 472-3182 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
500 Gladiolus St · (815) 472-2023

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.8%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.4%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms98.3%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.0%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.3%18.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.9%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.6%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table52.5%21.7%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine31.2%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.1%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.9%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.652.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.502.221.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.12U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.0–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 3.9–14.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.52
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
50.9%
Total nursing turnover
72.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 88.3 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.52 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.59 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.56 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-11-15)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident remained free from abuse. The facility also failed to keep a resident free from physical abuse, resulting in one resident striking another in the head with his cane and that resident requiring sutures.This applies to 1 out of 6 residents (R29) reviewed for neglect and abuse.The findings include: On 12/31/25 at 12:26 pm, R29 was observed with a bruise to his upper right cheek below the eye, and three sutures on the right eye lid. R29's 12/26/25 6:45 am progress notes showed that R29 was observed with bleeding from below his right eye. The progress note showed that it was reported that another resident hit R29. R29's 12/26/25 hospital report showed that R29 sustained a head injury and a laceration requiring three sutures. The facility's 12/26/25 incident report to Illinois Department of Public Health showed that on 12/26/25, R2 and R29 engaged in inappropriate physical contact. On 1/2/26 at 5:50 pm, V1 Administrator said that it was reported to her that R2 hit R29 in the head with his cane. V1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a gastrostomy tube feeding received care and services to maintain his weight. This failure resulted in a resident experiencing significant weight loss of 13.49% in less than 39 days. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R12) reviewed for gastrostomy tube use.The findings include:R12 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]th, 2022, with diagnoses including brain damage from a lightning strike, functional quadriplegia, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, and gastrostomy status for tube feeding. R12's December Physician Orders show he takes no food orally and receives nutrition from a gastrostomy tube feeding only. On 12/26/25 at 12:17 PM, R12 was in a wheelchair in his room. R12 appeared very thin and frail. R12 was alert and oriented and communicated using a communication board. R12 communicated that he frequently does not get fed and frequently does not get his medications. R12 communicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from neglect when a resident did not receive his psoriasis medication to prevent a psoriasis flare-up, and when the resident did not have weekly skin assessments to monitor his flare-up. These failures resulted in R1 experiencing a psoriasis flare-up, and then subsequently his skin lesions were not monitored. This applies to 1 of 7 residents reviewed for neglect in the the sample of 7. The findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet showed his diagnoses include generalized pustular psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis mutilans, and unspecified psoriasis. On December 14, 2023 at 11:50 AM, R1 stated he had psoriasis and starting having skin issues when he was around [AGE] years old. R1 said he has been waiting on the pharmacy to receive his Cosentyx injections, stating he has not gotten it. R1 stated it works great. R1 stated if he does not get it, he turns out like I am now .with scales, itchy, and painful. R1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Cosentyx was available for administration. This failure resulted in a resident experiencing a psoriasis flare-up. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for medications in a sample of 7. The findings include: R1's Face Sheet showed his diagnoses include psoriatic arthritis mutilans, generalized pustular psoriasis, and other psoriasis. On December 14, 2023 at 11:50 AM, R1 stated he had psoriasis and starting having skin issues when he was around [AGE] years old. R1 said he has been waiting on the pharmacy to receive his Cosentyx injections, stating he has not gotten it. R1 stated it works great when he received the starter doses. R1 stated if he does not get it, he turns out like I am now .with scales, itchy, and painful. R1 rated his pain at a 7 and stated he takes oxycodone for his pain. R1 denied he had any open skin areas and again described his skin as scaly, itchy, and painful. The skin on R1's face and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, failed to ensure resident lice treatments and environmental cleaning stopped lice re-infection. This applies to 5 residents (R6, R10, R4, R2, R9) reviewed for infection control practices.The findings include: On 6/24/26 at 12:19 pm, R4 said that she had head lice and she had to have her hair cut to get rid of them. R4's 4/15/26 progress note showed that lice were noted in R4's hair and a treatment was given. Two days later, R4's 4/17/26 progress notes showed that a small white substance was observed crawling on R4 again and a second dose of the treatment was ordered. R4's June 2026 eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record) showed another round of treatment was started on 6/3/26, approximately six weeks later.On 6/23/26 at 1:02 pm, R2 said that she was itching all over her body and she was told by staff she had lice and she was treated. R2's Physician orders Summary's showed the lice treatment was applied starting 6/2/2026 and was completed. Two weeks later, R2's 6/17/26 nursing note showed the physician was notified lice was again seen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered within acceptable time parameters. This applies to 4 of 7 residents (R1, R11, R12, R13,) reviewed for medication administration. The findings include:.1.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 has multiple diagnoses including spinal stenosis, congestive heart failure, type II diabetes, cardiomyopathy, hypercholesteremia, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, hyperlipidemia, morbid obesity, functional quadriplegia, low back pain, edema, depression, restless leg syndrome, and need for assistance with personal use.R1's April 2026 medication administration record (MAR) showed R1 has an order for Acetaminophen 500 milligrams (mg): give two tablets by mouth every four hours as needed for pain, Oxycodone 5-325mg: give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for a pain level of 7 or above.On April 07, 2026, at 11:56 AM, R1 said that medications often come late. R1 said that when R1 asks for pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect by failing to respond timely to call lights.This applies to 3 of 15 residents (R1, R6, R8) reviewed for call light response time in the sample of 15. The findings include:1.R1 is alert and oriented and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 has multiple diagnoses including spinal stenosis, congestive heart failure, type II diabetes, cardiomyopathy, hypercholesteremia, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, hyperlipidemia, morbid obesity, functional quadriplegia, low back pain, edema, depression, restless leg syndrome, and need for assistance with personal care.On April 07, 2026, at 11:56 AM R1 said that staff are often slow to respond to call lights, and it takes them awhile to come in to see what they may need if they even come in.2. R6 is alert and oriented and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R6 has multiple diagnoses including cerebral palsy, paraplegia, epilepsy, asthma, morbid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice for a representative was honored. This applies to 1 of 16 residents (R3) reviewed for residents' rights. The findings include:R3 was readmitted to facility on June 02, 2025, with multiple diagnoses including neuroleptic Parkinson's, selective mutism, major depressive disorder, need for assistance with personal care, weakness, muscle wasting, tremors, catatonic disorders and anxiety.R3's face sheet showed a general note section where it was documented that V16 (Family member) was R3's power of attorney (POA). Writer had spoken with V16, and facility was preparing to accept R3 into the facility.R3's progress notes showed the last communication with V16 was on November 21, 2025.R3' s hospital discharge instructions dated and uploaded on March 25, 2025, showed V16 is R3's legal guardian and substitute decision maker.On April 07, 2026, at 2:48PM, V16 said that they had tried consistently for months to get in touch with the facility's care team to discuss R3's condition and had not received any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care for residents who require assistance with care.This applies to 2 of 10 residents (R1, R6,) reviewed for ADLs.The findings include:1. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 has multiple diagnoses including spinal stenosis, congestive heart failure, type II diabetes, cardiomyopathy, hypercholesteremia, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, hyperlipidemia, morbid obesity, functional quadriplegia, low back pain, edema, depression, restless leg syndrome, and need for assistance with personal use.R1's minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], showed R1 is cognitively intact and requires a wheelchair for mobility. R1 requires maximal assistance from staff with toileting, showers, dressing, transfers, standing and personal hygiene.R1's current physician's orders showed an order for oxygen at bedtime related to acute embolism and thrombosis.R1's current care plan showed that R1 is incontinent of bladder and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene before and after providing incontinence care. This applies to 1 (R5) of 4 residents reviewed for infection control. The findings include: R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including cerebral infarction, metabolic encephalopathy, cognitive social or emotional deficit, cerebral infarction, epilepsy, chronic kidney disease, bipolar disease, hypertension and bradycardia.R5's minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], showed that R5 required maximal assistance from staff for all activities of daily living (ADL) including toileting. On April 10, 2026, at 11:18 AM, R5 was sitting in a wheelchair near the nurses' station. V26, certified nurse assistant (CNA), wheeled R5 into the bedroom to perform incontinence care. V26 applied gloves without performing hand hygiene. V25 (CNA) entered R5's room donning gloves to assist with care. R5 was placed on the bed and R5's clothing was removed. R5's adult brief had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's rights to be free of sexual abuse. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R3 and R4) reviewed for sexual abuse. The findings include:The facility's 03/01/26 Initial Report to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) showed CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated R1 [R3] attempted to make contact with R2 [R4]. R3 and R4 separated. 1:1 placed with R3. Head to toe assessments of R3 and R4 were conducted with no new findings and no complaints of pain. Telehealth evaluations conducted. MD (Medical Doctor), family, and police were notified. Well-being checks initiated. Investigation initiated.The facility's 03/06/26 Final Report to IDPH showed, Conclusion: After investigation and interviews, no evidence of abuse was found. R3 admitted to facility on 02/15/25 and [had moderately impaired cognition]. R4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and [had moderately impaired cognition]. Per interviews, staff member noticed R3 in wheelchair sitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have enough licensed nursing staff to pass medications in a timely manner and to consistently provide a resident's gastrostomy tube feeding as ordered.This applies to 15 residents (R1, R10, R12, R18-R29) reviewed for licensed nurse staffing. The findings include:On December 31, 2025, at 11:00 AM, R19 was still in bed and was restless. R19 asked for his medications and stated he did not get his morning medications. R19 stated he goes a lot of nights without getting his 9:00 PM medications until around midnight, adding he also goes a lot of days without getting his morning meds until around 11 or 12:00 PM, too. R19 stated I need them- I am very sick and me not getting my medications on time is making me sicker. R19's October 10, 2025, MDS (Minimum Data Set) showed R19 is cognitively intact.On December 31, 2025, at 11:05 AM, V20 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was at his medication cart, passing medications using the facility's EMR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure significant medications were administered as ordered.This applies to 6 residents (R10, R12, R18, R19, R20, R28) reviewed for medications.The findings include:1.On December 31, 2025, at 11:00 AM, R19 was still in bed and was restless. R19 asked for his medications and stated he did not get his morning medications. R19 stated he goes a lot of nights without getting his 9:00 PM medications until around midnight, adding he also goes a lot of days without getting his morning meds until around 11 or 12:00 PM, too. R19 stated I need them- I am very sick and me not getting my medications on time is making me sicker. R19's October 10, 2025, MDS (Minimum Data Set) showed R19 is cognitively intact.R19's Face Sheet showed he his diagnoses include malignant lung neoplasm, absence of his right and left legs above the knee, and hydradentis suppurativa (a chronic and painful skin condition that causes recurrent abscess-like lumps). R19's December 31, 2025, Order Summary Report showed Physician Orders for baclofen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of staff to resident abuse and an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse to the Illinois Department of Public Health within the required timeframes. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R5, R9) reviewed for abuse reporting.The findings include:1.On 1/2/25 at 9:57 am, R5, who was alert and oriented, said that on 12/7/25 she told the staff that R1 had a knife and held it to her neck and threatened her. R5 stated she was scared in the moment. On 12/27/25 at 2:30pm, V4 CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) said that 12/7/25 she worked the night of 12/7/25 and she heard R1 threatening R5 with a knife and R1 was standing over R5. V4 said that night, the staff found a knifes, a drill, a hammer, and lighters in R5's room. On 12/31/25 at 11:09 am, V3 CNA said the next day on 12/8/25, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) instructed her to search R1's room after it was reported that R1 had threatened R5. On 12/24/25 at 11:10am, V3 said while searching R1's room, she found a taser and a pocketknife under R1's bed. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate reported allegations of resident abuse, and subsequently failed to ensure residents were protected while the reported allegations were investigated. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R5, R9) reviewed for abuse. The findings include:1. On 12/19/25 at 2:32 pm, R9, who was alert and oriented, said that on 12/14/25, staff ripped his shirt and had their knee on his neck during a verbal altercation between R9 and the staff. R9 said that he told the CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) that night that they ripped his shirt, and he told the nurse that the CNAs had their knees on his neck. On 12/14/25 at 11:10 am, V5 CNA verified that R9 did tell her and show her that his shirt was ripped during the altercation. V5 said that R9 was sent to the hospital that night for his behaviors and she reported the incident to the Administrator and the DON. On 1/2/26 at 5:50 pm, V1 (Administrator) said that R9 did report that the staff ripped his shirt and the staff was being physically aggressive to him. V1 said that the incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe resident environment after a resident was able to obtain objects that could be used to threaten others. This applies to 2 residents (R1, R5) reviewed for safe environment. The findings include:On 1/2/25 at 9:57 am, R5, who was alert and oriented, said that on 12/7/25 she told the staff that R1 had a knife and held it to her neck and threatened her. R5 stated she was scared in the moment. On 12/27/25 at 2:30pm, V4 CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) said that 12/7/25 she worked the night of 12/7/25 and she heard R1 threatening R5 with a knife and R1 was standing over R5. V4 said that night, the staff found a knifes, a drill, a hammer, and lighters in R5's room. V4 said R1 also threatened to burn down the facility before she was discharged to the hospital that night. V4 said that the facility was trying to send her to jail, but she went to the hospital instead. On 12/31/25 at 11:09 am, V3 CNA said the next day on 12/8/25, V2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide care to a resident dependent on staff for ADL (activities of daily living). This applies to 1 of 3 (R5) residents reviewed for ADL care.The findings include:According to the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including acquired absence of left leg above knee, cellulitis of groin, hidradenitis suppurativa, and pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 3. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated June 5, 2025, showed R5 had mild cognitive impairment and required maximum assist with toileting hygiene, shower, and bathing. R5's Care Plan dated April 13, 2025, showed R5 has an ADL (Activity of Daily Living) self-care deficit and required staff assistance and showed that R5 is incontinent of bladder and bowel. Interventions include the CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) should check and change R5 every 2 hours and as needed.On August 25, 2025, at 12:40 PM, R5 was in bed with an empty urinal on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 10. The findings include: 1. FRI (Facility Reported Incident) report documents an incident of April 14, 2025, alleging that R1 made inappropriate contact with R2. The report indicates that immediate action taken: Residents were immediately separated. Body and pain assessments completed on R1 and R2. Police was notified. R1 was placed on 1:1 monitoring until sent out to the hospital for further evaluation. After interviewing staff and residents, it was discovered that R1 and R2 were waiting in the hallway to go out for smoke break but staff did not witness the incident. R2's EMR included diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent; Unspecified Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder unspecified R2's admission MDS dated [DATE], showed that R2 was cognitively intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from abuse for one of three residents (R3) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 3. This failure resulted in R3 being physically slapped by a staff member which caused R3 to experience emotional distress and led to R3 displaying increased agitation, aggression, and combative behavior. Findings include: R3's face sheet indicated that resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has a past medical history not limited to: cerebral infarction due to thrombosis, metabolic encephalopathy, bipolar disorder, personal history of physical injury and trauma, and tension-type headaches. R3's screening assessment for indicators of aggressive and/or harmful behavior dated 09/16/2024 revealed that R3 is at minimal risk for aggression with dementia, related interventions of re-orientation, re-assurance, emphasis on safety/security, and severe mental illness interventions of stress management/relief and harm reduction.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to keep a resident free from sexual abuse. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. The findings include: On December 3, 2024 at 11:15 AM, V10 (Cook) stated she had been coming out of the hallway bathroom on 11/15/2024, when she witnessed R2 patting R1 above her right breast on the outside of her clothing. V10 stated R2 then slipped his hand down the neckline of and underneath R1's shirt to her left breast. V10 stated she knew R2 could feel her presence because he stopped and left. V10 stated at first she thought R2 was just checking on her, then she saw him slip his hand down her shirt. V10 stated R1 is nonverbal and blind and regardless of if she reacted or not, R1 cannot defend herself. V10's written statement from the facility's 11/15/2024 investigation showed she .saw [R2] sitting in the hallway near the small dining room. I saw [R2] touch [R1] by her right side of her chest. I saw him put his hand under her shirt close to her left breast. Then when [R2] saw me he hurried up and moved his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the kitchen facility in a manner to prevent foodborne illness.This applies to 74 residents in the facility receiving dietary services. Findings include: On 11/14/24 4:36 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated 74 residents were served from dietary services on 11/12/24. On 11/12/24 at 10:45 AM, the dry storage contained: A large bin of breadcrumbs with use by date of 7/28/24. A large bin of oatmeal with use by date of 11/9/24. A large bin of rice with use by date of 10/30/24. A large bin of flour with use by date of 9/18/24. A large bin of thickener with use by date of 7/9/24. A clear plastic bag with dry penne pasta open to air. Two clear plastic bags containing dry fettuccini pasta open to air. Dented cans in rotation for use: Diced beats 6lb (pounds) 8 oz (ounces). Diced carrots 6lb 9 oz. Three cans of diced potatoes 6lb 6oz. Two cans of chunk tuna 4.16lb. The facility policy Storge of Dry Foods / Supplies dated 9/18/23 states dry goods will be handled and stored to maintain the integrity of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a resident and/or his family/POA (Power of Attorney) the reason of transfer to the hospital in writing. The facility also failed to notify the ombudsman of the transfer.This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R7, R26, R38, R74) reviewed for discharge in a sample of 18. The findings include: 1. On 11/13/24 at 2:27 PM, V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) stated, We don't notify the ombudsman about the transfer to the hospital. We don't get the ombudsman involved in the discharge or transfer of a resident. We only notify the ombudsman if the resident is non-compliant with something, or we can't reach an agreement with the resident. We didn't give a written notice to (R74) and his POA at the time of discharge to the hospital or afterwards. We notified the POA by phone. If we can't reach the POA, then social services emails or gives them a written notice. There's nothing uploaded in the resident's chart regarding the written notice of discharge to the hospital or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide in writing to residents and their families/POA (Power of Attorney) regarding bed hold and return at the time of discharge to the hospital. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R7, R26, R38, R74)) reviewed for discharge in a sample of 18. The findings include: 1. On 11/13/24 at 2:27 PM, V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) stated, We hold the bed for 10 days. That's guaranteed to the patient. We don't typically keep a copy of the bed hold notice. R74's face sheet shows an admission date of 9/9/24 to the facility. R74's progress notes document the following: On 9/19/24 at 10:30 AM, (R74) observed on floor positioned on buttock with against door in bedroom. No injuries no skin alterations. Resident noted being verbally aggressive towards staff. MD (Medical Doctor) notified. Received order to transfer to (Hospital) for CT (Computerized Tomography) scan and psych evaluation. Order carried out. DON (Director of Nursing) and family POA made aware. On 9/20/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain physician orders for residents to have medications at the bedside and failed to complete self-administration of medication assessments. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R18, R38, R58) reviewed for medications in a sample of 18. The findings include: 1. On 11/13/24 at 11:34 AM, R58 was observed sleeping in her bed. Her Fluticasone Propionate nasal spray 50 MG (Milligrams) was inside a box labeled with her name on the dresser that belonged to her roommate (R18) behind her curtain. Surveyor asked (R18) if it was hers and if she ever used it. R18 just stared at Surveyor and smiled. V6 (RN-Registered Nurse/Wound Nurse) who was in the room stated that R18 was nonverbal. On 11/13/24 at 2:18 PM, V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) said, I currently don't have any residents that can self-administer any medications. Any meds (medications) at the bedside need an order from the doctor. The nurse also must do a self-administration of medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to change PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) dressings.This applies to 1 of 7 residents (R75) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 18. Findings include: R75's face sheet showed R75 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes cellulitis of the right lower limb, diabetes mellitus, and cutaneous abscess of the foot. R75's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/29/24 shows she is cognitively intact. On 11/12/24 at 1:01 PM, R75 showed the surveyor the single lumen PICC line in her right upper arm. The PICC had a border gauze dressing in place that had drainage in the center of it. R75 stated the dressing had been in place 4 to 5 days and she had changed it herself. R75 stated the staff did not do the dressing changes on her PICC line. On 11/14/24 at 1:20 PM, R75 stated the dressing on her PICC line had not been changed. R75 showed the surveyor her PICC line had the same stained border gauze dressing, with more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refund resident funds after residents discharged from the facility. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1-R3) reviewed for resident funds. The findings include: The facility's Admission/Discharge To/From Report shows that R1 was discharged on 2/13/24, R2 was discharged on 2/26/24, and R3 was discharged on 1/29/24 (all over three months earlier). R1's Resident Fund Statement from 12/30/23-3/29/24 shows a balance of $2,097.70 in her account. R2's Resident Fund Statement from 12/30/23-3/29/24 shows a balance of $120.08 in her account. R3's Resident Fund Statement from 12/30/23-3/29/24 shows a balance of $30.09 in his account. On 5/31/24 at 10:41 AM, V3 (BOM/Business Office Manager) said when R1 was discharged from the facility she went to the hospital and then from the hospital he believes that she was sent to another facility, but that facility never contacted V3 to transfer R1's funds over. V3 said he will try to find out where R1-R3 are currently residing and get their funds sent over. At 1:09 PM, V3 said he found out where…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu plan and serve residents with alternatives for food items refused. This applies to 11 of 11 (R1, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R14) residents reviwed for meal service. The findings include: The facility's lunch meal for 5/15/24 listed Cuban style pork chop, red beans and rice, chocolate mousse, corn bread, margarine, and beverage. Their menu for lunch, or the substitute menu was not posted for the residents on the notice board in the hallway. After checking the temperature V4 (Cook) began to plate the food for the residents. During Lunch instead of chocolate mousse they served Banana Cream Pie. Corn bread was not available during lunch. By the end of serving R4 and R15 did not get, red beans and rice, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, and R14 did not receive Banana Cream Pie instead they were given [NAME] Crackers for dessert. On 5/21/24 dietary staff did not post the breakfast or lunch menu until 10:00AM and the menu in the kitchen and the menu posted in the hallway for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide alternate food to meet residents need. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R6, and R15) reviewed for alternate food and nutritional adequacy in the sample of 15. R1's MDS (minimum data set) dated April 25, 2024, indicated R1 has a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15 and she is cognitively intact. On 5/21/24 at 9:30 AM, R1 stated during interviews that she is not getting the food alternatives because she did not order the item the previous day. R1 stated that during the lunch meal she did not get the item that was listed on the planned menu and she requested a vegetable salad. According to R1, the dietary staff refused to give R1 the vegetable salad that she wanted since the menu as planned was not served. R1 added that staff refused to give her the salad since she did not order the salad the previous day. R1 continued and stated that residents do not get a breakfast menu but whatever the kitchen wants to serve. On 5/21/2024, R6 stated during interview that dietary staff refused to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's POA (Power of Attorney) of the resident's change in condition. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for notification of changes. The findings include: R1's 12/04/23 progress notes from 3:14 PM showed R1 was difficult to arouse, had not eaten breakfast or lunch, had increased fatigue, and his pulse was elevated (116). The note showed R1's physician was notified and new orders were given for metoprolol tartrate and lab work. No documentation of POA being notified of change in condition. On 12/27/23 at 10:39 AM, V3 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said on 12/4/23 from 6:30 AM until 7:00 PM, she was the nurse for R1 for part of the shift. V3 said R1 was in his room with breakfast tray. V3 said R1 was not eating his breakfast. V3 said she spoke with R1 and R1 said he was not hungry. V3 said she offered R1 an alternative meal, but he refused. V3 said R1 seemed tired like he wanted to sleep in. V3 said at lunch time she noticed R1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who require ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance received grooming cares. This applies to 5 residents (R31, R33, R61, R36 & R230) reviewed for ADLs in the sample of 31. 1. On 12/19/23 at 1:57 PM, R61 was observed in the hallway in her wheelchair with the hair on the back of her head matted. R61's electronic health records showed that she is an [AGE] year old female with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, age-related osteoporosis, Alzheimer's disease, non-suicidal self-harm, and major depressive disorder. R61's care plan 1/9/23 showed, Self-Care Deficit with impaired Dressing and Grooming abilities . keeping nails short with no more than Extensive Assist time 1 Staff 6-7 days weekly . Special Note for ADL Care: may have fluctuations in . normal day to day ADL Assistance and Staff Support Needs due to . Chronic Disease Process and/or any Acute exacerbations. The Restorative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post isolation signs for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), and failed to follow infection control guidelines for pericare, hand hygiene, and wound care. This applies to 5 residents (R3, R7, R31, R59, R230) reviewed for infection control practices in a sample of 31. The findings include: 1. On 12/19/23 at 1:32 PM, R3 was observed in his room with a personal protective equipment (PPE) box at the door side and no isolation posting/signage or stop sign at the door side to indicate the type of isolation and the PPEs visitors should wear to enter the room. R3's 11/21/23 Minimum Data Set showed he has severely impaired cognition. On 12/20/23 at 10:51 AM, there were still no signs showing staff and visitor to put on proper PPE (personal protective equipment) before entering the room. At 11:22 V8 (R3's sister-in-law) was observed going into R3's room without any PPE. At 11:50 AM, V8 stated, I visit R3 every day, and I took him to Bingo last Thursday, and nobody ever mentioned to me to wear a gown. I was told R3 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assess residents for self-administration of medications and obtain physician orders for residents' medication to be at the bedside. This applies to 2 residents (R31 & R68) reviewed for bedside medication in a sample of 31. Findings include: 1. On 12/19/23 at 10:20 AM, a cup containing 2 pills, 1 white and round, and 1 white and oval was observed on R31's bedside table next to a cup of water. R31 was in her bed asleep. At 11:39 AM the medications were observed gone and R31 said she thought she had taken the medications herself. On 12/21/23 at 9:21 AM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said that medication should not be left at the resident bedside and that no residents in the facility can administer medications by themselves. V2 said that residents should be assessed to see if they are competent before administering medication to themselves. V2 said that if medications are left at the bedside someone else can take the medications. R31's electronic record did not show an order for self-administration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have the call lights accessible to dependent residents. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R9 and R36) reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 31. The findings include: 1. On 12/19/23 at 10:41 AM, R9 was in bed asleep. R9 did not have a call light cord attached to the wall. R9 did not have any other methods of notifying staff of needing assistance. On 12/20/23 at 09:08 AM, R9 was in bed sleeping. R9 again did not have a call light cord attached to the wall, or any other methods of notifying staff of needing assistance. On 12/20/23 at 2:20 PM, R9 was in bed sleeping. R9 still did not have a call light cord or any other methods of notifying staff. R9's face sheet showed her dianoses include dementia, blindness, diabetes, weakness, congestive heart failure, hypertension, gait and mobility abnormalities, mixed conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. R9's MDS (MDS/Minimum Data Set) dated 12/05/23 showed R9 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a home-like environment for residents. This applies to one resident (R56) reviewed for homelike environment in a sample of 31. The findings include: On 12/19/23 at 10:53 AM, during the initial tour rounds, R56's floor was dirty, had food, candy on the floor by the bedside and the trash can was overflowing with garbage in the trash can and on the floor, there were several empty bottles of water. On 12/20/23 at 10:17 AM, R56's floor was still dirty with food and candy, and the trash can was still overflowing with garbage. R56 said she told housekeeping staff yesterday that her floors were dirty and that the trash can needed to be emptied, but the housekeeping staff did not show up yesterday nor this morning. R56 said that housekeeping staff does not come to their rooms everyday to clean or sweep the floors, and she does not have access to a broom so she can sweep. R56 said it does not feel like home to her and does not like it that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a resident-to-resident assault. This applies to two residents (R32 and R49) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 31. The findings include: On 12/19/23 at 2:06 PM, a scab was observed under R49's left eye near the bridge of his nose. R49 stated his previous roommate had punched him in the face. On 12/21/23 at 3:50 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated R32 hit R49 in the face and the two residents were separated. R32 was moved to another room. R32 MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/19/23 documents R32 has physical and verbal behavioral symptoms of aggression directed towards others. R32's behavior occurs one to three days per week. Nursing progress note for R49 dated 12/18/23 at 4:49 AM documents R49 being hit by R32. On 12/21/23 at 4:01 PM, V1 stated R32 and R49 were immediately separated and R32 was sent to the hospital for evaluation after the altercation. V1 stated the final report of resident-to-resident abuse will be completed on 12/22/23. The facility's initial report and submission of the incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were completely flushed through a gastrostomy tube, and failed to ensure alcohol was dry before obtaining a blood glucose value. This applies to 2 residents (R3, R72) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 31. Findings include: 1. On 12/20/23 at 10:51 AM, V12 (Nurse) was observed preparing R3's medications for administration via R3's gastric tube (G-tube). V12 crushed up 6 medications and put them in individual cups: 81mg Aspirin, 10mg Lisinopril, 1mg Benztropine, 600mg Guaifenesin , 5000 IU Vitamin D 125mg, 20mg Baclofen V12 checked for placement in R3's G-tube and then began administering his medications. V12 was observed placing the crushed medications in the syringe, in its powdered form, then would add 20 to 25cc of water in the syringe. V12 did not dilute the medications with water prior to placing them in the syringe. V12 did this with all 6 of the medications. After V12 gave the last crushed medication,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' toenails were cut, and failed to protect the feet of a resident with circulatory problems. This applies to 2 of 10 residents (R36, R49) reviewed for foot care in a sample of 31. The Findings include: 1. On 12/19/23 at 9:40 AM, R49 was observed ambulating with a walker and wearing non-skid socks. R49 was being escorted outside by V4 PTA (Physical Therapy Assistant) On 12/19/23 at 2:06 PM, R49 stated because of the bandages on his feet, his shoes did not fit. R49 stated the staff offered him double-socks to wear. R49 stated he was never offered any other footwear to accommodate his bandages. On 12/20/23 at 11:07 AM, V5 (Wound Nurse) stated R49 did not have any special equipment for his feet. At 11:36 AM, long and overgrown toenails and crusty white substance were noted on R49's feet and legs. On 12/20/23 at 11:45 AM, V6 (Wound Physician) stated he had not been informed that R49 was unable to wear his shoes with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure anti-contracture devices were applied as ordered. This applies to 1 resident (R72) reviewed for anti-contracture devices in a sample of 31. The findings include: On 12/19/23 at 10:18 AM, R72 was in bed. R72's left hand was closed and in a fist position. R72 was not wearing a hand splint. R72 said she wears a splint to her left hand when the staff applies it. On 12/20/23 at 08:53 AM, V14 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant/Restorative) said she did not apply left hand splint to R72 yesterday because she was busy doing weights. V14 said the floor CNAs can apply splints as well, but they did not apply it yesterday. V14 said R72 should have the splint applied every day due to the left-hand contracture. On 12/21/23 at 09:45 AM, V15 (Restorative LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said R72's PROM (Passive Range of Motion) and splint application is scheduled every day during morning care, between 6:30 AM -7:30 AM, prior to breakfast. V15 said R72's splint is removed before lunch, at 12 PM. V15 said she did not know why…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room was free of trip hazards. This aplies to 1 of 31 residents (R69) reviewed for environmental risk in a sample of 31. The findings include: On 12/19/23 at 11:28 AM, surveyor tripped on broken floor tile in R69's room. The broken tile located in the pathway between R69's bed and bathroom door. R69 was observed standing from his wheelchair and unsteadily walking into the bathroom. R69's medical record shows he diagnoses of dementia, seizures, and weakness. R69's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/18/23 shows he has moderate cognitive impairment. R69 requires staff supervision / touch assistance with walking and transfers. On 12/20/23 at 1:51 PM, V3 Maintenance Director stated he was not aware of the broken tile. V3 stated he and V12 (Psychiatric Services Director / Social Services) are assigned to do guardian angel rounds on that unit. V3 stated he did not do his assigned rounding on the unit. V3 stated nursing staff are able to submit repair request through the computerized system or the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary storage/containment of respiratory equipment when not in use, and failed to ensure that a resident could use their BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) as ordered by the physician. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R42 and R56) reviewed for use of respiratory equipment in a sample of 31. The findings include: 1. On 12/19/23 at 10:45 AM, R42's BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) machine was on the nightstand. The BiPAP mask was on top of the machine and not contained. On 12/20/23 at 09:09 AM R42's BiPAP mask was still on top of the BiPAP machine and not contained. R42 stated she is supposed to use the BiPAP machine every night but is currently not using it because the mask does not fit. R42 said she informed the nurses that the mask does not fit. On 12/21/23 at 01:15 PM R42's BiPAP mask continued to be on top of the machine and not contained. On 12/21/23 at 11:21 AM, V2 (DON) said all BiPAP masks while not in use should be in a plastic bag or some covering to prevent contamination. V2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to maintain temperature logs, label food items, and discard outdated food items. This applies to 2 residents (R10 & R6) reviewed for personal food storage in a sample of 31 residents. The findings include: 1. On 12/19/23 at 10:53 AM, R60 did not have a thermometer, or a temperature log for the personal refrigerator in the room. R60's refrigerator contained a pack of lunch meat that was opened and did not have a date on it. On 12/21/23 at 12:58 PM, R60's refrigerator still did not have a thermometer or a temperature log. The opened lunch meat continued to be not dated. R60's face sheet showed R60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. On 12/19/23 at 12:15 PM, R10 did not have a thermometer, or temperature log for the personal refrigerator in the room. On 12/20/23 at 11:55 PM, R10's refrigerator still did not have a thermometer or a temperature log. R10's face sheet showed R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility's Refrigerator policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide daily feeding tube site care. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R2, R4) reviewed for feeding tubes in a sample of 17. Findings include: On 11/7/2023 at 12:10 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) confirmed care and cleansing of the feeding tube site is completed daily and documented on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). V2 stated if the care is not documented and signed off as completed on the TAR it is considered not done. 1. On 10/30/2023 at 1:30 PM, V5 (Nurse), provided R2's bolus feeding. R2's feeding tube did not have a dressing present and the skin surrounding the the feeding tube had moderate amount of dried drainage present. R2's Physician Order Summary Report dated 11/8/2023 documents R2 with an order dated 11/26/2022 to cleanse the feeding tube site and cover with a dressing every day. R2's September and October Treatment Administration Record does not document R2's feeding tube site care being provided every day as ordered. 2. On 10/30/2023 at 11:50 AM, R4's continuous tube feeding was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent employee to resident mental abuse. This applies to 1 of 16 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 16. The findings include: R1's admission Record dated 11/3/2023 documents R1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include major depression, cocaine dependence, opioid dependence, suicide attempt, self harm sharp glass, restless, agitation, violent behavior and anxiety. An Initial facility Incident Report, dated 10/26/2023, documents on 10/25/2023 V5 (Nurse) used inappropriate language in the presence of R1. On 11/1/2023 at 11:28 AM V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated, R1 had alleged she was raped early morning 10/25/2023, was transported to hospital, and returned a few hours later. After she returned, R1 was hallucinating and packing her bags saying she was leaving. Orders were received from a nurse practitioner for R1 to be directly admitted for a psychiatric evaluation. On 10/26/23 at 1:15 PM, R1 sat on her bed in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the Administrator or designee. This applies to 1 of 16 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse reporting in a sample of 16. Findings include: The facility Abuse Prevention Program policy dated 1/2019 documents it is the policy of the facility to prohibit and prevent resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident property. This policy documents employees are required to immediately report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse or mistreatment they observe, hear about, or suspect to the Administrator. In the absence of the Administrator, reporting can be made to the DON (Director of Nursing). An Initial facility Incident Report, dated 10/26/2023, documents on 10/25/2023 V5 (Nurse) used inappropriate language in the presence of R1. On 10/26/23 at 1:15 R1 stated, .I just don't know if I feel safe though, they just started hollering at me. R1 said that the staff that cared for her the previous night just started hollering at her and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-26 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff to carry out the functions of food service. This has the potential to affect all the residents who eat by mouth from the facility. The findings include: On 9/20/23 Facility data sheet indicated facility has 79 residents. Two of their residents are NPO (Nothing By Mouth) and do not consume food from the kitchen. On 9/20/23 surveyor entered the facility Kitchen at 10:56 AM. V5 (Cook), and V6 (Dietary Aide) were the only staff members working in the kitchen. The kitchen floor was not clean and a box of buttermilk biscuits was sitting directly on the floor. The freezer floor was noted with a box of scrambled egg mix sitting directly on the freezer floor. On top of the scrambled eggs, eleven boxes of food items were found stacked on top of each other. One box of ready-to-serve fresh-cut produce, fresh shelled eggs, another box of broccoli cuts were also sitting directly on the freezer floor. Three boxes of opened and unlabeled items were also directly on the floor. On 9/20/23 at 10:56 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food on the menu was served as posted. This has the potential to affect all the residents who consume food from the facility kitchen. The findings include: The 9/20/23 Facility Data Sheet showed the facility census was 79 residents. Two residents are on NPO (Nothing by Mouth) status. On 9/20/23 surveyor entered the Facility Kitchen at 10:56 AM. On 9/20/23 at 10:56 AM, V5 (Cook) stated V11 (Kitchen Manager) is the supervisor he hasn't been here for a while. The facility's lunch menu for 9/20/23 showed Meatballs with Tomato Sauce, Spaghetti Noodles, Italian Blend Vegetables, Garlic Texas Toast, with Strawberry Blondies for dessert. Instead on 9/20/23 during lunch, the Kitchen served mashed potatoes, turkey stew, a bun, and apple sauce. On 9/20/23 at 11:00 AM, V5 (Cook) stated I don't have Meatballs and I don't have Strawberry Blondies .I have substituted turkey stew with mashed potatoes and applesauce. At 11:15 AM, V5 stated the food that is needed is not being ordered. V5 stated there was a food delivery…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's medication order. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration. The findings include: R1's Face Sheet showed his diagnoses included anxiety disorder and violent behavior. R1's June 21, 2023 MDS (Minimum Data Set) showed R1 was moderately cognitively impaired. On August 11, 2023 at 9:38 AM, R1 stated that recently an agency nurse (V5) prepared some medication in a syringe and gave it to R1 under R1's tongue. R1 stated the resident in the same room with him (R2) received morphine for his pain. R1 stated the nurses had never given him any medication under his tongue before, so R1 asked the nurse what the name of the medication was. R1 stated the nurse told him it was morphine. R1 stated the morphine made him throw up twice and his bed was wet from the vomit. R1 stated he also felt some constipation for three or four days. R1 stated V5 does not work at the facility every day and he does not know her name. On 8/11/23 at 2:19 PM, V3 (Registered Nurse/Infection Preventionist)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to check for safe food temperatures and failed to provide palatable foods. This applies to 83 residents who receive meals from the kitchen. Three residents do not eat food from the kitchen due to receiving nutrition via a gastrostomy tube. Findings include: 1. On March 14, 2023, the food temperatures for lunch were not checked. On March 15, 2023, at 10:47 AM, the food temperature log was reviewed. During review, several dates were not filled out for breakfast and lunch, including February 27, 2023, February 28, 2023, March 1, 2023, March 2, 2023, March 4, 2023, March 5, 2023, March 7, 2023, March 8, 2023, March 9, 2023, and March 10, 2023. On March 15, 2023, at 10:55 AM, V7 (Cook) said he did not put the temperatures in the log and forgot to do it. On March 17, 2023, at 1:16 PM, V17 (Cook/Dietary Aide) said the cook was supposed to fill out the log and temperatures should be done because there is a risk for residents to get a foodborne illness. On March 17, 2023, at 9:27 AM, V16 (Dietician) said the food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a warm and clean environment. This applies to 8 residents (R241, R53, R46, R21, R240, R51, R32, and R66) reviewed for homelike environment in a sample of 25. The findings include: 1. On 3/14/23 at 11:37 AM, R241 was observed in her room wearing a t-shirt, sweater, winter coat and winter hat. R241 said she was cold and there is no heat in here. R241 had winter gloves laying on her bed and said she wears those when she gets really cold. On 3/14/23 at 3:00 PM, R241 was observed in the hallway wearing winter coat, hat, and gloves and said she was colder now than she was earlier. On 3/15/23 at 9:43 AM, R241 was observed in her room wearing a winter hat, gloves and a fleece coat. 2. On 3/14/23 at 11:07 AM, R53 was observed in her room wearing two nightgowns and said she was cold and that facility staff told her they were going to caulk around her window two weeks ago, but had not done that yet. On 3/15/23 at 9:36 AM, R53 was lying in bed with two nightgowns on and four blankets on top of her. R53 said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure privacy for residents by leaving residents' urinary catheter drainage bags in view of passersby. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R13 and R23) reviewed for catheter care in a sample of 25. Findings include: 1. R13 is a [AGE] year-old female with mild cognitive impairment as per Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. On 3/15/23 at 2:07 PM, R13 was observed in her bed sitting at the bedside with an indwelling catheter drainage bag which was visible to roommates and visitors. 2. R23 is a [AGE] year-old male with moderate cognitive impairment as per MDS dated [DATE]. On 3/15/23 at 11:42 AM, R23 was observed in his bed with a urinary catheter drainage bag visible to his roommate and visitors. On 3/15/23 at 10:16 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing - DON) stated, We don't have any specific policy on privacy bag with urinary catheter bag. A privacy bag should be around the urinary catheter bag, especially with roommates.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow Physician Orders for a pressure ulcer treatment and failed to follow clean technique during pressure ulcer dressing changes. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R9) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 25. Findings include: 1. R9 is a [AGE] year-old male with intact cognition as per Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. R9's March 15 2023 Order Summary Report showed his diagnoses included pressure-induced deep tissue damage of his left and right heels and showed to perform treatments to both wounds daily. On 3/14/23 at 1:40 PM, during wound care, R9 stated, The facility is not following the physician's order to change my left leg dressing daily. I am not getting a wound dressing change every day. I refused wound dressing change only one day, and that was because of the way the wound care nurse was interacting (rude) with me. R9's February and March Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed R9's wound dressing changes were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain orders for providing PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) line care, and failed to change a PICC line dressing. This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R66) reviewed for intravenous access care in a sample of 25. Findings include: On March 14, 2023, at 11:00 am, R66's left upper arm PICC line was dressed in gauze and clear transparent dressing. The dressing was dated 3/1/23 (13 days earlier). R66 stated his PICC line dressing should have been changed. R66's March 2023 Physician Orders showed a March 1, 2023 order for a PICC line insertion. On March 14, 2023, at 5:53 pm, Physician Orders were entered for PICC line dressing change to left upper extremity every day shift Tuesday and as needed (13 days after R66's PICC line was placed). On March 16, 2023, at 9:23 am, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated the RNs (Registered Nurse) do the central line dressing changes. V2 stated central line dressings should be changed every seven days and as needed, and stated R66's PICC line dressing should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to manage a resident's pain for a wound dressing change. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R9) reviewed for pain management in a sample of 25. Findings include: R9 is a [AGE] year-old male with intact cognition as per Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. R9's March 15 2023 Order Summary Report showed his diagnoses included pressure-induced deep tissue damage of his left and right heels and showed to perform treatments to both wounds daily. On 3/14/23 at 1:23 PM, V3 (Wound Care Nurse) and V4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) provided a left heel wound dressing change. R9 was not assessed for pain. V4 raised R9's left leg up and held it six inches above the mattress. V3 then removed the old dressing with drainage and cleansed the wound with wet gauze. R9 vocalized, it hurts .it hurts. V3 continued with the dressing change and did not ask R9 about his pain. On 3/14/23 at 2:15 PM, V3 stated, I didn't assess R9 for pain because I know he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document when a resident's narcotic pain medication was administered. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R9) reviewed for pain medication administration in a sample of 25. Findings include: R9 is a [AGE] year-old male with intact cognition per Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. Record review on the narcotics log sheet indicates that 23 doses of Norco 10/325 milligrams were pulled from R9's locked narcotics box from 3/9/23 to 3/15/23. R9's March 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that only three doses were documented as administered. On 3/16/23 at 11:20 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing - DON) stated controlled medications, including Norco, should be documented on the Narcotics log when they pull that medication from the Narcotics box, and then must be documented on the eMAR after administering it. The facility provided policy and procedure on Controlled Substance (undated) documents: Records shall be maintained by authorized nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.7-1.7 vs chain
The other 68 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alpha Home - A Waters CommunityIndianapolis, IN 1 of 5Belhaven Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Continental Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Heritage Place Care & Rehabilitation LLCWinchester, TN 1 of 5Hope Creek Nursing & RehabEast Moline, IL 1 of 5Landmark Of Richton Park Rehab & Nsg CtrRichton Park, IL 1 of 5Landmark at 95th Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Hyde Park Rehabilitation and Nursing CChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Itasca Rehabilitation and Nursing CentItasca, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Lincoln Park Rehabilitation and NursinChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Oak Lawn Rehabilitation and Nursing CeOak Lawn, IL 1 of 5Parker Nursing & Rehab CenterStreator, IL 1 of 5The Waters Of Smyrna, LLCSmyrna, TN 1 of 5The Waters Of Springfield LLCSpringfield, TN 1 of 5Waters Of Clifty Falls, TheMadison, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Covington, TheCovington, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Dillsboro-Ross Manor, TheDillsboro, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Georgetown, TheGeorgetown, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Hobart Skilled Nursing Facility, TheHobart, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Lebanon, TheLebanon, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Martinsville, TheMartinsville, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing CtrMemphis, TN 1 of 5Waters Of Princeton, ThePrinceton, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Rockport Skilled Nursing Facility, TheRockport, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Scottsburg, TheScottsburg, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Sullivan Nursing Facility, TheSullivan, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Syracuse Skilled Nursing Facility, TheSyracuse, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Tipton Skilled Nursing Facility, TheTipton, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Wabash Skilled Nursing Facility East TheWabash, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Wakarusa Skilled Nursing Facility, TheWakarusa, IN 1 of 5Westpark A Waters CommunityIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Ambassador Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 2 of 5Midway Neurological / Rehab CenterBridgeview, IL 2 of 5The Waters Of Cheatham, LLCAshland City, TN 2 of 5The Waters Of GallatinGallatin, TN 2 of 5The Waters Of Johnson City, LLCJohnson City, TN 2 of 5Waters Of Batesville, TheBatesville, IN 2 of 5Waters Of Castleton Skilled Nursing Facility, TheIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Waters Of Dunkirk Skilled Nursing Facility, TheDunkirk, IN 2 of 5Waters Of Greencastle, TheGreencastle, IN

Showing 40 of 68; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
A&F REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST32%since 07/03/2006
GUBIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST34%since 11/01/2013
O'SULLIVAN, SINEADIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/05/2018

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense28% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 96%Medicare 3%Other / private 1%

About 96% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$292per resident / day
operating cost
$8,892per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$247per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145713. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next