Hope Creek Nursing & Rehab
4343 Kennedy Drive, East Moline, IL 61244 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 245 certified beds · (309) 796-6600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $386,400 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-20)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.6% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.2% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 83.4% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.3% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.8% | 18.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.1% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.8% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.7% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 33.3% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.5% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 22.6% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.24 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.85 | 2.22 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 41.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.9%CMS range 29.2–47.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 8.7–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 41.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.2–11.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 245 beds and averages 154.1 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 91 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
62 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-08-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical and verbal abuse and identify and investigate a potential allegation of abuse and protect resident from further abuse from R500, with a known history of verbal and physical aggression. These failures resulted in R500 verbally yelling and physically hitting R134 and shoving both R84 and R103 to the ground. R84 sustained a bleeding laceration to posterior head, facial bruising, and hospitalization requiring three staples to R84's posterior head. R103 experienced hip and knee pain, bruising, and hospital evaluation. R134 was hit in the face. These failures have the potential to affect all 35 residents residing in the facility's Dementia unit. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed on 8/29/24, the facility remains out of compliance at a Severity Level 2 as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the facility's removal plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-02 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately provide CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) to one resident (R1) identified as having no Advance Directives and failed to follow their policy which documents that Direct and non-direct care staff upon finding a resident non-responsive shall remain with that resident as is possible while signaling for assistance. The facility also failed to ensure all staff received training on the facility CPR Policy. On [DATE] at approximately 9:25am R1 was found unresponsive and without a pulse or respirations in his room by V7 (RN - Registered Nurse). V7 then left R1's room to make telephone calls to another nurse regarding R1's condition and to V2, (DON - Director of Nursing). This failure resulted in R1 not receiving Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation when found without a pulse and not breathing by V7, (RN) who left R1 and did not return to R1's room until V5, (RN) and V6, (LPN - Licensed Practical Nurse) had started CPR. This failure placed 59 current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a system to assess and evaluate residents for capacity to consent to sexual activity, failed to ensure two cognitively impaired residents (R1, R2) who engaged in a sexual act had the capacity to consent, and failed to prevent two cognitively impaired residents (R1, R2) who didn't have the capacity to consent, from engaging in a sexual act resulting in (R1) experiencing psychosocial harm as any reasonable person would be affected in a total sample of four resident reviewed for abuse. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed on 4/4/24, the facility remains out of compliance at a Severity Level Two as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the removal plan including their Inservice Training and Quality Assessment oversite. Findings include: Facility Policy Abuse Prevention Program dated 3/1/21 documents: As part of the social history evaluation and MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments, staff will identify residents with increased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented for a resident who is at a high risk for falls. This failure resulted in R1 being found in her room, laying on the floor, sustaining a comminuted right humerus fracture requiring surgical interventions. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 8. The findings include: R1's Final Incident Report shows R1 is [AGE] year-old female, cognitively impaired. On 1/17/26 at 8:00 AM, R1 was found laying on the floor next to her bed with severe complaints of right arm pain. R1 was sent to the local hospital for evaluation. R1 sustained a right humerus fracture with surgical intervention.R1's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] shows she is HIGH risk for falls. On 03/20/26 at 10:07 AM, R1 was residing on the memory care unit. R1 was in her room sitting in her wheelchair. R1 was wearing an immobilizer to her right arm. R1 was alert to self and forgetful. R1 said she fell at a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe environment, provide adequate supervision, and implement necessary assistive interventions for three (R1, R2, and R3) of three residents reviewed for falls. These failures resulted in repeat falls or injury events, some with head trauma, lacerations, and hospitalizations. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention and Management Program revised 5/5/2025 documents the purpose of the Fall Management Program is to provide residents with an interdisciplinary approach to assess risk of falls and provide appropriate interventions to prevent falls. The facility will ensure that in an event a fall occurs, the fall will be investigated, appropriate treatment will be provided, and additional interventions will be implemented to prevent another fall from occurring as much as possible.1) R1's Hospital Discharge paperwork dated 8/5/25 documents R1 had a fall prior to admission. R1 was taken to local emergency room where R1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to prevent and protect cognitively impaired residents from physical abuse for 2 of 4 residents (R1, R4) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 7. This failure resulted in R1 wandering into R2's room, was then physically removed and led to R1 falling on the floor and sustaining head trauma and also resulted in R5 forcefully grabbing her roommate R4 by the hair and wrists that caused R4 to feel angry and scared of R5. Findings include: 1. Final incident report with incident date of 03/10/2025 indicated that, it is believed by staff witness [R1] entered [R2's] room and in turn pushed [R1] to keep him out of his room, which led to [R1] falling, however, [R2] was not observed by the staff at that moment. [R1] received a body assessment which revealed no abnormal findings and had no complaints of pain. R1's fall investigation report dated 03/10/2025 at 2:30 PM documented that R1 was allegedly pushed by another resident. R1 was wandering into R2's room as was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide immediate post-fall care to one resident (R1) receiving anticoagulant therapy of three residents reviewed for falls with injury. This failure resulted in delayed treatment of a subdural hematoma. The facility also failed to safely turn and position one resident (R4) of three residents reviewed for accidents with injury. This failure resulted in R4 sustaining a nasal fracture. Findings include: Facility Employee Education Record/Falls and Anticoagulation: What You Should Know dated 11/18/24 documents: Key Points: Blood thinners, or anticoagulants, help prevent blood clots but can increase the risk of bleeding. Falling is a major reason why some people hesitate to take blood thinners. If you fall while on a blood thinner, contact your healthcare provider right away. Bleeding isn't always visible. You could bleed internally and not know it, and that's a significant concern. For example, we worry about brain bleeds when people fall and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform pressure ulcer treatments per order for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of five. This failure resulted in (R1) acquiring a Stage 4 pressure ulcer. Findings include: Facility Skin Integrity Guideline, undated, documents The purpose is to provide a comprehensive approach for monitoring skin conditions, decrease pressure ulcer and/or wound formation by identifying those patients/residents who are at risk, and implementing the appropriate interventions, and to promote healing of wounds whether admitted or acquired. R1's current care plan documents (R1) is at risk for skin breakdown related to impaired mobility with an intervention of monitor skin care daily, and assess for changes in skin condition each shift. (R1) has a pressure ulcer to her right heel related to immobility with an intervention of administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness, prevalon boots at all times, and the resident needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate and determine a root cause analysis of a fall, failed to implement fall interventions, and failed to provide supervision during toileting to prevent a fall for one of five residents (R120) and failed to monitor a personal safety monitoring device for a resident identified as high risk for elopement for one of two residents (R341) reviewed for accidents/incidents in the sample of 64. As a result of this failure R120 fell in the bathroom after being left unattended on the toilet on 05/03/22, and was subsequently transferred to a local hospital and diagnosed with a left femoral neck fracture. Findings include: 1. The facility's Incidents/Accidents/Falls policy (undated) documents the following: It is the policy of the facility to ensure that any incident/accident to include falls is reported immediately to the nurse or appropriate person designated to be in charge. After the resident has had immediate attention and their safety is established,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the resident call light system in working order for 4 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R8, R13) reviewed for call lights in the sample of 13.The findings include:1.On 6/15/26 at 9:25 AM, R1 and R2 were seated in bed in their room. R1's call light hung on the wall behind R1's bed. R1 stated, My call light hasn't worked in weeks. R1's call button was pressed. R1's call light was not functioning as it did not light up or beep. R2's call light hung on the wall behind R2's bed. R2 stated, My call light doesn't work either. Mine hasn't worked in a long time. R2's call button was pressed. R2's call light did not work as it did not light up or beep. At 9:36 AM, the call light in R1 and R2's shared bathroom was tested and found to be not working.On 6/15/26 at 10:37 AM, V13 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated that when a resident's call light is pressed, staff are alerted by the computer at the nurse's station on the unit. V13 stated the computer screen will show the room number of the resident needing assistance. V13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for physical environment in the sample of 13.The findings include:R1's current care plan showed R1 had a colostomy in place to his abdomen. R1's colostomy allowed R1's stool to drain into a bag through a stoma (surgical opening) from R1's abdomen. On 6/15/26 at 9:23 AM, a moderate amount of a dried brown substance was noted on the handles of R1's walker. When R1 was asked what the substance was on his walker, R1 stated, That's poop. I tried to change the bag on my colostomy the other day. On R1's windowsill, directly next to his bed, dried stool was noted on a washcloth, a pair of scissors, and a box of colostomy bags. Multiple dried brown stains were noted on the privacy curtain next to R1's bed. When R1 was asked when his room was last cleaned, R1 stated, A guy (housekeeper) was just here this morning. He mopped and emptied my garbage. My stuff really needs to be washed down. That curtain has been dirty for a while. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents that were dependent on staff with toileting were provided Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for 2 of 8 residents (R7 and R6) reviewed for ADL care in the sample of 13. The findings include:1.R7's electronic face sheet shows R7 has diagnosis that includes dementia with psychotic disturbances and anxiety.R7's facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R7 was always incontinent with bladder functions.On 6/15/26 at 9:52 AM, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) toileted R7 after breakfast. R7 was noted to be wearing 2 incontinent pads (double diapered) R7's incontinent pad was saturated with urine. V4 said she did not get up R7, (V5 CNA did). V4 stated R7 should not wear two diapers, R7 just needed to be toileted more often at least every two hours and as needed.R7's care plan dated 3/25/22 documents I have functional bladder incontinence r/t (related to) Dementia, Impaired Mobility, Physical limitations with intervention to include,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Physician Progress Notes and orders were maintained with a resident's record and followed promptly. The facility failed to ensure accurate and complete monitoring of a surgical site was being completed. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 4.The findings include:On 4/12/26 at 9:48 AM, R1 was in bed on her back with head of bed elevated slightly. R1 had a gown on and incontinence brief. R1 had a healed surgical scar to the middle outer area of her right leg. R1 had a small abrasion above the surgical site that she stated was from the hinge brace. R1 stated she had surgery and then came to the facility. R1 said she had to go back to the hospital for another procedure because she had an infection to her leg.The Progress Note dated 2/24/26 for R1 stated she was asking about her antibiotic start date. A call was placed to the surgeon's office and the nurse said there wasn't one ordered. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify a pressure wound prior to becoming a stage 3 for a resident at risk for pressure ulcers (R1) and failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were implemented for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R4) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 7.The findings include:1. R1's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility 1/30/23 with diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis, arthritis, secondary gout, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, depressive episodes, Parkinson's disease, and pressure ulcer of left buttock. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she had severe cognitive deficits, was dependent on staff for most cares, and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. R1's 1/15/26 Weekly Wound Evaluation showed, . Sacrum. Pressure Injury (In-House Acquired) . Stage 3. Length: 5 cm. Width: 1.5 cm. Depth: UTD (unable to determine) . R1's care plan initiated 7/31/24 showed, [R1] has the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents (R1) in the sample of 7 reviewed for visitation rights were allowed to receive their chosen visitors.The findings include:On 8/22/25 at 11:37 AM, V4, Social Services Director, said V13 is R1's significant other/girlfriend. V4 said V13 is not allowed to visit R1 any longer. V4 said V13 calls the facility almost every day trying to come to the facility. V4 said R1's guardians, V9, would go back and forth about allowing V13 to visit R1. V4 said currently the decision to not allow V13 to visit has been made by the facility and the police.On 8/22/25 at 10:32 AM, V3, Receptionist, said V13 is not allowed to visit R1 at all. V3 said V4 came and told all the receptionists not to allow V13 to visit. V3 said she is supposed to ask V13 to leave and if she won't leave, they are supposed to get the police involved. V3 said V13 calls frequently and asks when she can visit again. V3 said she tells V13 to call V9. V3 said the electronic kiosk at the front desk even says, Access denied when V13 tries to check in to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility to ensure a resident's therapeutic diet was provided. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for diets in the sample of 7.The findings include:On 8/22/25 at 12:40 PM, R3 was in the dining room eating his noon meal. R3 was served one corndog, pasta salad, watermelon and cottage cheese. R3's neon colored diet card shows he is on regular diet, low concentrated sweets, no pork and double protein. R3 said he was served one corndog and should receive double protein.On 8/22/25 at 12:54 PM, V6 (Dietary Manager) said R3 is on regular diet, low concentrated sweets and no pork. V6 said the corn dogs are made with turkey and chicken. R3 should receive double protein with each meal and should have received two corn dogs. The cooks in the kitchen are new and she will in-service the staff to ensure residents receive their correct diet.R3's Physician Order Sheets dated through August 2025 shows his diet order is cardiac low concentrated sweets, provide 1/2 portion carbs and double proteins with meals and no pork.The facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for one of 29 residents (R76) in a sample of 67. Findings include: R76 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Polyosteoarthritis, Restless Leg Syndrome, Essential Hypertension, Anemia, Osteoporosis, Depression, Fall, Spinal Stenosis and Orthopedic Aftercare and Contusion of Right Hip. post fall at home. R76's Progress Notes document on 6/3/25, R76 sustained a fall, was transferred to the hospital, was surgically treated for a left wrist fracture and returned to the facility with a left-hand brace and sling to arm, non-weight bearing to left upper extremity and pain medication. R76's medical record did not include a completed Significant Change in Condition Comprehensive Assessment/Minimum Data Set (MDS). On 6/26/25 at 1:00 PM, V15 (Care Plan and MDS Coordinator) stated a Significant Change in Condition Comprehensive Assessment/MDS had not been completed and should have been.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to correctly assess fall risks, develop a comprehensive care plan and implement intervention to prevent a fall with injury. This resulted in the resident sustaining a wrist fracture due to a fall because appropriate fall prevention interventions were not implemented timely for one of 29 residents (R76) in a sample of 67. Findings include: The Comprehensive Care Plans Guidelines policy dated 5/25 documents the comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. All Care Assessment Areas (CAAs) triggered by the MDS will be considered in developing the plan of care. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well-being; any services that would otherwise be furnished but are not provided due to the resident's exercise of his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for one of one resident(R1), reviewed for incontinence care, in a sample of 3. The facility policy, Guidelines for Incontinence Care, dated 9/21/23 documents, It is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents receive as much assistance as needed for cleansing the perineum and buttocks after an incontinent episode or with daily care. Frequency depends on bladder diary results and/or routine minimal every two-hour checks as well as care planning. R1's facility Face Sheet documents that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Polyneuropathy, Arthritis, Morbid Obesity, Major Depressive Disorder, Lymphedema and Dementia. R1's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 10/11/24 documents that R1 is, always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R1s Care Plan in effect on 1/16/2025 documents, (R1) has a functional bowel and bladder incontinence r/t (related to) Impaired Mobility, Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-31 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespreadHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to effectively resolve grievances voiced in resident council meetings. This failure has the potential to affect all 160 residents who reside in the facility. Findings Include: Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 10/25/23 documents concerns from residents stating the kitchen needs to be more organized to be able to serve meals on time, and there needs to be more staff in the dining room to help serve meals on time as well. The General Feedback/Grievance Form dated 10/25/23 documents Resident Council topic of concern Dietary. Detailed Description of Occurrence: kitchen to be more organized, need service to be faster, would like alternatives to spicy food. The Steps taken to investigate concern and corrective action taken areas were blank. The Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 11/29/23 documents concerns from residents that their meal tickets that staff helps them fill out does not always match what they are serving for the meal, prefer their milk in the cartons, soups are not hot enough and council members are wondering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store dry foods in a clean manner and failed to ensure all kitchen staff had their hair covered. These failures have the potential to affect all 160 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings Include: The facility's Employee Health and Personal Hygiene policy dated 4/2017 documents Food service employees shall maintain good personal hygiene and free from communicable illnesses and infections while working in the facility. Hair restrains will be worn at all times. Beards should be well trimmed and covered with an appropriate hair restraint. The facility's Storage of dry foods/supplies policy dated 4/2017 documents dry foods stored in bins such as flour and sugar will be removed from the original packaging. Storage bins used will be kept clean, labeled and dated. Scoops will not be stored in the food bins. On 8/27/24 at 9:00 AM in the dry storage room in the kitchen there were four clear bins individually marked oatmeal, flour, thickener and bread crumbs. None of the bins were labeled with dates.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to don PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) properly during a COVID-19 outbreak, ensure Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was utilized throughout wound care, residents were placed in contact isolation with active wound infections and Enhanced Barrier Precautions per order, assess residents for signs and symptoms of COVID-19, initiate isolation precautions and ensure a resident's environment was kept free from cross contamination of MRSA (Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus) pathogen during wound care for eight of 32 residents (R55, R37, R57, R71, R101, R114, R122, R127) reviewed for Infection Control in the sample of 124 residents. These failures have the potential to affect all 160 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings Include: 1.The Facility's Post Public Health Emergency-Standard and Guidelines policy dated 5/16/2023 documents The facility will follow CDC (Center for Disease Control) guidelines including prompt detection, triage and isolation of potentially infectious residents to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-31 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities daily to meet the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. These failures have the potential to affect all 35 residents residing in building four on the second floor. Findings include: The facility roster, dated 8/26/24, documents 35 residents (R5, R11, R16, R20, R26, R28, R29, R33, R34, R39, R41, R46, R49, R51, R54, R57, R65, R71, R72, R75, R78, R83, R86, R90, R96, R101, R106, R109, R110, R114, R125, R126, R129, R135, R141) reside on building four on the second floor. The Quality of Life Policy and Procedure, no date, documents III. Activities A. The Facility shall provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and careplan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff treated the resident with dignity and respect for one resident (R101) reviewed for resident's rights in a sample of 124. Findings include: On 08/26/24 at 10:00 AM, R101 stated she had diarrhea during the night, and no one answered R101's call light. R101 stated she had to clean herself up but made a mess on the bed and pointed at the blanket on the bed. R101 stated the staff were notified the blanket needed to be washed. On 8/26/24 at 10:00 AM, R101's bedside table was observed with a breakfast tray and a blanket on the bed was observed with a brown/diarrhea stool smear approximately 5 centimeters by 12 inches long. Multiple spots of brown/diarrhea stool were observed next to R101's bed on the floor. On 8/26/24 at 12:30 PM, R101 was observed to be lying in bed with a lunch tray on the bedside table (breakfast tray had been removed), fully clothed, covered with a blanket reading a book lying on the soiled blanket and brown spots remained on the floor. On 8/26/23 at 2:48 PM, R101 was observed in bed (lunch tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement their abuse prevention program to protect residents from abuse for three (R84, R103, and R500) of four residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 124. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program, revised 3/1/21, documents Employees are required to immediately report any incident, allegation, or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment or a crime against a resident they observe, hear about, or suspect to the Administrator. In the absence of the Administrator, reporting can be made to the DON (Director of Nursing). Upon learning of the report, the Administrator or in the absence of the Administrator, the DON shall initiate an incident investigation. All incidents, allegations or suspicion of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or a crime against a resident will be documented. Any incident or allegation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, or a crime against…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify and investigate a potential allegation of verbal and physical abuse for two (R84 and R500) of four residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 124. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program, revised 3/1/21, documents: It is the policy of this facility to prohibit and prevent resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident property and a crime against a resident in the facility. The following Procedures shall be implemented when an employee or agent becomes aware of abuse or neglect of a resident, or of an allegation of suspected abuse or neglect of a resident by a 3rd party. Upon receiving reports of physical or sexual abuse, the Charge Nurse will immediately examine the resident. Findings of the examination must be recorded in a separate Incident Report and the resident's medical record. This report shall be made immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made. The Charge Nurse must complete an incident report and endeavor to obtain a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-31 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to do a Level 2 PASARR (Pre- admission Screening and Resident Review) screen for one of two residents (R73) reviewed for PASARRs in total sample of 124. Findings Include: The facility policy, named, Resident Assessment Policy and Procedure, dated 2019, documents the following: The facility shall coordinate assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program. Referring all Level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment. The facility shall notify the state mental health authority or State intellectual disability, as applicable, promptly after a significant change in the mental or physical condition of a resident who has a mental disorder or intellectual disability for resident review. R73 's Medical Diagnosis List, dated 2/10/2021, documents the following diagnosis: Alcoholism, Anxiety, Depression, Disorganized Schizophrenia, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to update the care plan to reflect the removal of the tracheostomy for one of one resident (R127) reviewed for careplans in a sample of 124. Findings include: The facility policy, named Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning Policy and Procedure, dated 2022, documents the following: The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care. The interdisciplinary team will review and revise after each assessment both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessment. R127's Physician Order Sheets, dated 8/20/2024, documents the following: Mid neck: Cleanse. with wound cleanser, apply an antibiotic ointment and cover with band-aide as needed for discontinued trach site. R127's Care Plan dated 6/26/2024, documents the following: R127 has a tracheostomy related to impaired breathing mechanics. R127's Care Plan has not been revised to show the removal of the tracheostomy. On 8/29/2024 at 10AM V19/MDS (Minimum Data Set/Care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide range of motion programming to residents with limitations in range of motion for two of seven residents (R57, R78) reviewed for limited range of motion in a sample of 124 residents. Findings include: 1. R57's current care plan documents I would benefit from participation in an AROM (Active Range of Motion) Restorative Nursing Program as evidenced by the following risk factors and potential contributing diagnosis: History of Cerebral Vascular Accident (lack of blood flow to the brain) with Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis both involve weakness or paralysis on one side of the body). Resident will have AROM exercises to the following extremities- left upper extremity, left lower extremity, right upper extremity, right lower extremity. Interventions: The Restorative Aide and/or Unit Aide will complete AROM Programming to the following extremities bilateral upper and lower 15 repetitions times two sets six to seven days per week. R57's Point of Care History Restorative Nursing Active Range of Motion flowsheet lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a residents indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was secured in a dignity enclosure bag for one of four residents (R55) reviewed for urinary catheters in the total sample of 124. Findings include: Facility's (indwelling urinary catheter) Foley Catheter Management Policy, dated 2/28/19, documents, Policy: the facility will have a system for the management of urinary catheters. All Catheter bags are covered with privacy bags at all times. R55's Care Plan, dated 7/8/24, and 8/27/24 states R55 has 16fr, Balloon 10ml indwelling catheter due to hydronephrosis. On 8/28/24 at 10:47 AM, R55 was sitting in a wheelchair in her room. R55's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was attached to the underneath of her wheelchair touching the ground. The drainage was not contained in a privacy covering. On 8/29/24 at 9:56 AM, V2 (DON, Director of Nursing), confirmed that all residents who have an indwelling urinary catheter should have a privacy bag covering the urinary drainage bag and it should be kept off of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store medications in a safe manner for three residents (R7, R5, and R124) observed during a routine medication pass in a total sample of 124. Findings Include: The facility's Storage of Medications policy dated 5/8/19 documents the purpose of the policy is to ensure that medications are stored in a safe, secure and orderly manner. Medications are stored in the containers in which they are received. On 8/27/24 at 8:10 AM V22 (Registered Nurse) opened her medication cart and pulled out a clear medicine cup full of pills with writing on the side and administered the medications to R124. V22 stated that the medicine cup was full of R124's morning medications to include: Aspirin 81 mg (milligrams), Clopidogrel 75 mg, Lisinopril 5 mg, Oxybutin 10 mg, Vitamin D 10 mg, Keflex 500 mg, Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-100mg, Ropinorole .25 mg and Triheyphenidyl hydrochloride 2 mg. Also, on 8/27/24 at 8:10 AM V22 stated that she did not normally prepare medications before she is ready to administer them. V22 stated that there were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-31 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure coordinated care was implemented by failing to ensure documented hospice services rendered was included in the resident's medical record and available and accessible to the interdisciplinary team (IDT) for one of 11 residents (R71) reviewed for Hospice care Management in a total sample of 124. Findings include: The Nursing Facility Hospice, General Inpatient and Respite Care Services Agreement, dated 10/19/20, documents Hospice will develop a Plan of Care which will identify the care and services that are needed and will specifically identify which provider is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the Plan of Care. The Plan of Care will also reflect the participation of the Hospice, the facility, and the Hospice patient and his or her family to the extent possible. A copy of the Plan of Care will be furnished to the facility upon each update. Hospice will provide representatives of the Facility with access to attend and participate in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent resident to resident physical abuse for one resident (R2) of three residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of four. Findings include: Facility Policy/Abuse Prevention Program dated 3/1/21 documents: It is the policy of this facility to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident property and a crime against a resident in the facility. This facility will not tolerate resident abuse or mistreatment or crimes against a resident by anyone, including staff members, other residents, consultants, volunteers or staff of other agencies, family members, legal guardians, or other individuals. Abuse (definition): The willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm or pain or mental anguish or deprivation by an individual, including caretaker, of goods and services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered within the one hour before/one hour after the designated 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., medication pass for two residents (R4 and R6) of four residents (R2, R3, R4, and R6) reviewed for medications being administered on time, in a total sample of four. FINDINGS INCLUDE: Facility policy, entitled Medication Administration, not dated, document, Unless otherwise specified by the physician, medications will be administered within 60 minutes before or after the facility's dosing schedule, except before or after meal orders and non-routine time ordered medications and 4. Medication Administration Record will be signed after for each medication administered to the resident. Medications that are refused by the resident or are not administered for other reasons will be circled on the particular day of no administration. The reason for not administering the medication will be documented on the back of the Medication Administration Record. On 10/12/23, V2 Confirmed, according to the time-stamped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food off the floor in the dry food storage area, refrigerator, and freezer. This failure has the potential to affect 123 of the 125 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Food Storage of Dry Foods/Supplies policy dated 4/2017 documents Food and hoods shall be stored at minimum of six inches off the floor and 18 inches from the ceiling and clear of ceiling sprinklers, sewer pipes and vents. The facility's Storage of Refrigerated/Frozen Foods policy dated 4/2017 documents Foods should be stored at a minimum of six inches from the floor. On 8/20/23 at 6:26 AM, a walk-through of the kitchen and food storage areas was conducted with V4, Human Resources Director (HR). During the walk through, there are 24 boxes of food in the dry storage, 22 boxes of food in the freezer and 6 boxes of food in the refrigerator observed sitting on the floor. V4, HR, stated That's the food that was delivered on Friday. They just haven't gotten around to putting it away yet. On 8/21/23 at 10:40 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to answer resident call lights in a timely manner for six residents (R15, R36, R38, R42, R49, R62) of 32 residents reviewed for call lights in a sample of 32. Findings include: The facility's Call Light Policy undated, documents It is the policy of the facility to have a system in place to allow staff to respond promptly to a resident's call for assistance and to ensure that the call system is in proper working order. 2) Call lights are to be answered promptly by staff who see that the call light has been activated. 1. R42's minimum data set (MDS) documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15. A BIMS of 15 indicates an individual is cognitively intact. On 08/20/23 at 8:14 AM upon entry of R42's room, there was a strong bowel movement (BM) like odor in the room. R42 stated It's about time your here! I've been pushing my call light since 7:00AM. I had a BM and need changed. This surveyor explained the purpose of the visit. At that point, R42 picked up her call light and hit the button stating I'm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-23 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident Council Members complaints and concerns were addressed and residents received responses and/or rationales for their recommendations for five (R15, R36, R38, R49, and R62) of five residents reviewed for Resident Council Concerns in the sample of 32. Findings include: The facility's Resident Council Policy, dated 2/9/16, documents The role of the Resident Council is to improve the quality of life of the residents who reside in the facility and to take part in actions to maintain a positive living environment. The Resident Council offers an avenue by which residents can have an active role in influencing decisions which will affect them. Participation and involvement in the Resident Council gives the resident a sense of being in control which results in a positive impact on their physical and mental health. Some objectives of the council are as follows: A. Improves communication between staff and residents; B. Serves as a source for new ideas; C. Helps to identify quality of life issues; D. Assists individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide an appropriate indication for use of antipsychotic medications, failed to identify target behaviors on the psychotropic medication consent, failed to document justification for administration of antipsychotic injections and failed to justify duplicate antipsychotic medications for six residents (R61, R63, R71, R73, R115, R233) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 32. Findings include: Facility Policy/Psychotropic Drug Usage (undated) documents: Each resident receiving an antipsychotic medication for organic brain disorders (referred to as Dementia) is observed for: Episodes of the behavioral symptoms being treated and/or manifestation of the disordered thought process. The following specific conditions are acceptable to warrant the use of antipsychotic medications: Organic mental syndromes (including all forms of dementia) with associated psychotic and/or agitated behavior which are: persistent, not caused by a preventable reason and causing the resident to represent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-23 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Residents were offered snacks in the evening for five (R15, R36, R38, R49, and R62) of five residents reviewed for Resident Council Meetings in the sample of 32. Findings include: The facility Snacks policy and procedure, dated 4/2023, documents Snacks will be passed out by staff during specific times as ordered by physician/RD (Registered Dietician) and in the evening time snacks will be available for residents. Procedure: Snacks will be available in the evening to provide residents with additional foods at night between dinner and breakfast meals; The snack will be provided according to what is ordered for each specific resident and passed out to the resident. On 8/20/23 through 8/22/23 between 9:00 am through 3:00 pm, there were no visible snacks for residents at the Nurses Station or dining room areas. On 8/22/23 at 9:30 AM, during the Resident Group Meeting, R15, R36, R38, R49, and R62) stated they are not offered snacks in the evening before bed and have bought their own. R36 and R62 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care for a resident who is a current smoker in the facility for one of one resident (R49) reviewed for smoking in the sample of 32. Findings include: The facility's Policy and Procedure of Comprehensive Care Plans revised December 2017 states, Comprehensive Care Plan will be developed for each resident that includes: problem/need of resident; measurable objectives and interventions to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the Comprehensive Assessment. This same policy documents Comprehensive Care Plans are to be done with every new admission, annually, quarterly and upon a significant change in status. The facility's Smoking Policy (undated) documents the resident's Care Plan will be reflective of the resident's needs for safe smoking. This same policy states, The Smoking Assessment will be done by the Social Services Designee with input from the IDT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to address a residents need for incontinence care for one resident (R42) and failed to provide daily grooming needs for one resident (R90) out of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living in a sample of 32. Findings include: The facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) policy undated, documents Residents are given routine daily care and HS (bedtime) care by a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) or a Nurse to promote hygiene, provide comfort, and provide a homelike environment . ADL care of the residents includes: Assisting the resident in personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, eating, hair care, oral care, appropriate skin care (as indicated and as per care plan) as well as encouraging participation in physical, social and recreational activities. The facility's Incontinence Care policy undated documents It's the policy of the facility to ensure that residents receive as much assistance as needed for cleaning the perineum and buttocks after an incontinent episode or with routine daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to obtain daily weights for one of 26 residents (R111) reviewed for physicians' orders in the sample of 32. Findings include: The facility's Physicians Orders (Following Physician Orders) Policy, undated states, It is the policy of this facility to follow the orders of the physician. At the time of admission the facility must have physician orders for the resident's immediate care. The facility will have orders to provide essential care to the resident, consistent with the resident's mental and physical status upon admission. R111's current Order Summary Report documents R111 with diagnoses to include but not limited to: Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure/CHF; Localized Edema; and Atrial Fibrillation. This same Order Summary Report documents an order for daily weights to be obtained and a weight gain of three pounds in one day or five pounds in one week is to be reported to R111's Cardiologist (V10). This order has a start date of 7/3/23 with no end date. R111's current Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility to ensure a resident (R49) was not in possession of their own smoking materials (cigarettes and lighter) and failed to identify the root cause of falls (R71) for two of eight residents reviewed for accidents and supervision in the sample of 32. Findings include: 1. The facility's Smoking Policy, undated, documents All residents' smoking materials will be kept by the facility in a secure location. This same policy states, Procedure: 10. Smoking materials will be kept in a safe/secure location within the facility under staff control. 11. Residents will have no smoking materials in their possession. This includes lighters, matches, loose tobacco, rolling papers, chewing tobacco, pipes and loose pipe tobacco. A. Smoking materials may be accepted by the Administrator, SSD/Social Service Director, Charge Nurse. B. All smoking materials will be held in the facility smoking cart/receptacle (secured). R49's Quarterly Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide required staff to care for dependent residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 136 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Staffing policy, no date available, documents, It is the policy of this facility to provide an adequate number of staff to successfully implement resident functions to meet resident needs. Adequate staffing ratios, by numbers and positions, required to meet the needs of the resident will be maintained. The facility's Grievance form, dated 1/6/22, documents, Topic of Concern: Call light response time. The facility's Grievance form, dated 1/20/22, documents a concern with long call light times and staff responsiveness. The facility's Resident Council/Food Committee Minutes, dated 4/27/22, document, Topic: Council members feel at times that call lights are not answered in a timely fashion. The facility's Resident Council/Food Committee Minutes, dated 5/26/22, document, Topic: Council members commented that they don't feel there is enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-01 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct the required 12 hours of CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) in-services including Dementia training. This failure has the potential to affect all 136 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's CNA In-Service forms were reviewed. There was no documentation of the required CNA in-services totaling 12 hours. On 06/30/22 at 11:28 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated, There is no tracking of the individual required 12 hour CNAs trainings that the staff have received. I don't feel that we have the required 12 hours, and we are deficient. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident's Census and Condition of Residents Report, form 672, dated and signed by V4 (Consultant) on 6/28/22, documents that at the time of the survey 136 residents resided in the facility.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-01 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ the services of a Certified Dietary Manager. This failure has the potential to affect all 136 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings Include: The facility's Classification Description for Director of Food Services job description (undated) documents the following: Duties: Develops nutrition care plans on each resident; Attends multi-disciplinary care plans as scheduled; Assumes in-service training for dietary employees. The training should encompass regular and therapeutic diets, interpretation of classification description and work procedures, use of equipment, safety and sanitation standards, and personal grooming; Follow up on nutrition goals set for residents, including supplements, diet changes, weight recommendations, etc. Evaluate progress being made towards goals with Dietician; Prepares all schedules; Writes general and therapeutic menus with approval of consultant Dietician on aspects of Food Service Department; Analyzes cost of nutrition programs; Sets budget guidelines for Food Services;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were served warm, palatable meals. This failure has the potential to affect all 136 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility Assessment, dated 5/27/22, documents, Services and Care We Offer Based on our Residents' Needs: Nutrition-Individualized dietary requirements, liberal diets, specialized diets, IV nutrition, tube feeding, cultural or ethnic dietary needs, assistive devices, fluid monitoring or restrictions. The facility's Dining Experience policy, no date available, documents, Meals will be nourishing, attractive, palatable, and will have taken into account religious, cultural, and ethnic needs. The facility's Monitoring Food Temperatures for Meal Service policy, no date available, documents, Food temperatures will be monitored daily to prevent food borne illness and to ensure foods are served at palatable temperatures. The facility's Resident Council/Food Committee Minutes, dated 4/28/21, document, Topic: Council members concerned that at times the food is not very…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-01 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespreadEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide substitutes of equal nutritional value during meals. This had the potential to affect all 136 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Dining Experience policy, no date available, documents, Meals will be nourishing, attractive, palatable, and will have taken into account religious, cultural, and ethnic needs. Staff will offer alternatives, food replacements or other choices if a resident is observed to not eat well, or express dissatisfaction with the meal. The facility's Menu Substitutes policy, dated 2014, documents, The facility will need to have substitutes available. Substitutes should be of similar nutritive value as the menu. This means that the substitute food to be offered should be from the same food group as the menu item that was not eaten. On 06/27/22 at 11:14 AM, R118 was alert and oriented sitting up in her wheelchair. R118 stated, The food here is horrible and it's always cold. I don't get an option of what I do and don't want before the meal is served. I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure items in the kitchen were clean and dry, food items were dated upon opening, scoops were stored out of direct contact with food, beverages and nutritional supplements were not expired, and pipelines in the freezer were undamaged and functioning without signs of water damage. This failure has to potential to affect all 136 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Storing Utensils, Tableware, and Equipment policy (undated) documents the following: Glasses and cups should be stored upside down/inverted. Store all scoops used for bulk foods in a clean, sanitized location. Do not store scoops for bulk food in bins. The facility's Labeling and Dating of Foods policy (undated) documents the following: Once a package is opened, it will be re-dated with the date the item was opened and shall be used by the safe food storage guidelines or by the manufacturer's expiration date. On 06/27/22 from 10:40 AM - 11:15 AM, a tour of kitchen was conducted with V8 (Acting Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-01 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance Committee failed to meet quarterly to identify, review and correct identified issues. This failure has the potential to affect all 136 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 6/30/2022, V1/Administrator provided the following: (The facility) Quarterly QAA (Quality Assurance Attendance) meeting dated May 27, 2022. On 06/30/2022 at 9:15 A.M., V1/Administrator, was unable to provide attendance sign-in sheets for any Quality Assurance Meetings held with documentation of who attends, or issues that have been identified and are being discussed for performance improvement, prior to 5/27/2022. At that time, V1 stated he has only conducted one QA Meeting and has no idea what happened prior to him beginning employment at the facility. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident's Census and Condition of Residents Report, form 672, dated and signed by V4 (Consultant) on 6/28/22, documents that at the time of the survey 136 residents resided in the facility.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Noncompliance resulted in two deficient practices. A. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete required COVID-19 testing, failed to ensure staff donned and doffed PPE (personal protective equipment) prior to entering/exiting a COVID-19 isolation/quarantine room and failed to ensure appropriate signage was posted to identify residents in COVID-19 isolation. These failures have the potential to affect all 136 residents in the facility. B. Based observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to place a urinary catheter collection bag in a clean area for one of three residents (R67) reviewed for urinary catheters in the sample of 64. 1. Findings include: Facility Policy/COVID-19 Residents and Staff Testing dated 3/31/22 documents: Testing of Staff and Residents during an outbreak Investigation: A new COVID-19 infection in any staff or nursing home-onset COVID-19 infection in a resident triggers an outbreak investigation. Upon identification of a single new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning call system to 20 residents (R11, R29, R32, R42, R46, R65, R67, R82, R85, R86, R92, R108, R109, R110, R117, R241, R243, R244, R245, R246) of 136 residents reviewed for call light response. Findings include: Facility Policy/Call Lights (undated) documents: It is the policy of the facility to have a system in place to allow the staff to respond promptly to a resident's call for assistance and to ensure the call system is in proper working order. 1. All facility staff must be oriented to and aware of the call light system. 2. Call lights are to be answered promptly by staff who see that the call light has been activated. 3. Bedside call lights will be seen and heard over the door of the resident's room as well as at the nurses' station area. 4. In the event of a widespread call light malfunction - bells or other means of notifying the staff will be instituted. Further every 15 minute documented rounds will be initiated until the call lights are functioning. The Centers for Medicare and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure electronic monitoring was not tampered with for one of two residents (R34) whose rooms are electronically monitored by family in a sample of 64. Findings Include: The Facility's undated Policy and Procedure: Photographing, Video Recording, Audio Recording, and Other Imaging of Residents, Visitors and Employees policy documents, 2. Photographing/Audio Recording of Residents by Residents, Family Members and/or by Visitors: The facility is not required to obtain consent from the resident, but must be notified in advance, when the resident is the subject of the photography/audio recording and such recording is performed by the resident or the resident's family members or the resident's visitors. R34's Electronic Monitoring Notification and Consent Form dated 4/1/2022 documents, the type of electronic monitoring device I am planning to install is video and audio. The form does not contain any indication of any conditions or restrictions on the monitoring. The State of Illinois Electronic Monitoring in Long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to allow visitation for one resident (R82) of 13 residents reviewed for visitation during a COVID-19 outbreak in the sample of 64. Findings include: Facility Policy/COVID-19 Visitation and Communal Dining/Activities dated/revised 3/11/22 documents: Facilities must allow indoor visitation at all times and for all residents as permitted under the regulations. While previously acceptable during the PHE (Public Health Emergency), facilities can no longer limit the frequency and length of visits for residents, the number of visitors, or require advance scheduling of visits. COVID-19 Positive Residents dated 6/27/22 indicated 13 residents were identified as COVID-19 positive on that date. Resident Rapid COVID Testing Log indicates R82 tested positive for COVID-19 on 6/21/22. On 6/29/22 at 9:35am R82 stated that he and his family were told visitors are not allowed in the facility during a COVID outbreak. R82 stated he has not had any visitors since he went into isolation for COVID. At that time, R82 was in a room at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain Advanced Directives for two of five residents (R108 and R241) reviewed for Code Status in the sample of 64. Findings include: Facility Policy/Advance Directives Policy and Procedure dated [DATE] documents: The following steps will be completed to promote and implement this process: Determine upon admission whether the resident/legal representative has an advanced directive and if not, determine whether the resident/legal representative wishes to formulate an advance directive. Establish mechanisms for documenting and communicating resident choices to the IDT (Interdisciplinary team). 1. Upon admission, the facility will provide written information to resident/legal representative concerning the resident's rights to make decisions regarding medical care including the right to accept/refuse medical treatment and the right to formulate advance directives. 2. Upon admission, the facility must determine if the resident executed an advance directive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to recognize potential abuse for two of eleven residents (R51 and R127) reviewed for abuse in a total sample of 64. Findings Include: The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 3/1/21 documents It is the policy of this facility to prohibit and prevent resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident property and a crime against a resident in the facility. The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm or pain or mental anguish or deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental psychosocial well-being. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Verbal Abuse is defined as Any use of oral, written, or gestured language that includes disparaging and derogatory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two allegations of abuse were immediately reported to the Administrator for three of 11 residents (R34, R51 and R127) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 64. Findings include: The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 3/1/21 documents It is the policy of this facility to prohibit and prevent resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident property and a crime against a resident in the facility. The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm or pain or mental anguish or deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental psychosocial well-being. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Verbal Abuse is defined as, Any use of oral, written, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to investigate two instances of potential abuse for two of 11 residents (R34 and R51) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 64. Findings Include: The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 3/1/21 documents It is the policy of this facility to prohibit and prevent resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident property and a crime against a resident in the facility. The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm or pain or mental anguish or deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental psychosocial well-being. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Verbal Abuse is defined as Any use of oral, written, or gestured language that includes disparaging and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain orders for routine water flushes with gastric feedings and failed to have one resident (R34) assessed by a Registered Dietician. R34 was one of three residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 64. Findings Include: The Facility's undated Dietitian Consultant Policy and Procedure documents, A qualified, licensed Dietitian will be contracted for consulting purposes. The Dietitian Consultant Policy and Procedures documents, The dietitian will work with the facility per contract which may include but not limited to a) assess special nutritional needs of the residents. R34's admission Record documents R34 was admitted on [DATE] with a gastric tube in place and was being fed through the gastric tube three times daily. R34's Medical History and admission Orders form dated 2/7/2022 documents Diet: IsoSource 1.5 cal (Calories) two containers bolus TID (Three times daily). R34's admission Physician Order Sheet dated 2/9/22 documents IsoSource 1.5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the feeding port cap was secure to prevent the unintended leakage of formula, and failed to position a resident to prevent aspiration for one of two residents (R132), reviewed for tube feedings, in a sample of 64. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility policy, Enteral Tube, dated October 2021 directs staff, The facility assures the safe and effective administration of enteral formulas based on nursing assessment of the resident's condition and approval by the physician. R132's current Physician Order Sheet, dated June 2022 includes the following diagnoses: Parkinson's Disease, Lewy Body Dementia, TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack) and History of Gastrostomy Tube. This same document includes the following Physician Orders: 2-Cal (Calorie) 1 can (237 ml) (Milliliters) TID (Three times daily) through g-tube by gravity, for weight loss; Flush 180 ml of water before and after bolus feeding tid. R132's current Care Plan, dated 3/22/2019 includes the following Focus Area: (R132) has a G-tube in place due to history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the implementation of dialysis, failed to follow physician ordered dietary restrictions, and failed to communicate the resident's condition regularly with the dialysis center, for two of two residents (R84 and R113), reviewed for dialysis, in a sample of 64. The (undated) facility policy, Communication Hemodialysis directs staff, To ensure coordination of care for residents requiring Hemodialysis in the community. All residents that are admitted to the facility with needs for Hemodialysis will have coordination of services between the facility and the Hemodialysis unit. Special consideration will be given to residents going to dialysis to coordinate therapy, medication administration and meals. A sack lunch will be provided to residents that are going to dialysis during meal times following the special dietary orders of the resident. The facility will obtain orders from the physician for the resident dialysis. 1.) R113's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's menu met a resident's nutritional preferences for one of six resident (R113), reviewed for food preferences, in a sample of 64. The (undated) facility policy, Resident Likes and Dislikes/Food Preferences, directs staff, Resident's food preferences will be recorded and consistently utilized. Data including resident likes, dislikes, allergies, food preferences will be entered into the computerized tray card system. The (undated) facility policy, Dining Experience documents, Meals will be nourishing, attractive, palatable and will haven taken into account religious, cultural and ethnic needs. All residents will be visited by the Dining Services Manager within 48-72 hours to introduce them to the dining program and inquire about food preferences and eating habits. R113's current Physician Order Sheet, dated June 2022 documents that R113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This same document includes R113's current diet as:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$386,400 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $48,500 — penalty dated 2026-03-20
- $23,562 — penalty dated 2024-12-03
- $84,262 — penalty dated 2024-08-31
- $94,054 — penalty dated 2024-07-02
- $136,022 — penalty dated 2024-04-05
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-12 for 2 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
The other 68 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 68; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUBIN, MOISHE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 10/01/2020 |
| WHITTINGTON, TRUDY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 10/01/2020 |
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $795K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145269. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.