No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Waters Of Castleton Skilled Nursing Facility, The

8400 Clearvista Pl, Indianapolis, IN 46256 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 114 certified beds · (317) 845-0464 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (317) 845-0464 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
FAIRBANKS0.7 mi
 
Urgent care / clinic
8435 Clearvista Pl Ste 101 · (317) 621-1006 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7240 E 82nd St · (317) 849-8150 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7899 E 88th St · (317) 842-4075 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6801 E 91st St · (317) 849-2227 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.7%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms70.4%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.2%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.2%23.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.5%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.1%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.2%13.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%79.0%79.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.5%CMS range 45.4–73.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.3–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
61.0%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 51.6 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-16)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse, resulting in crying and emotional distress for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents' 20, 37, 40) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 37 was reviewed on [DATE] at 3:00 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia. She resided on the memory care unit of the facility until [DATE]. The [DATE] Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated she had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 5, indicating she was severely cognitively impaired. The [DATE], 7:18 p.m. nurses note, recorded as a late entry on [DATE], read, Writer notified sister [name of sister] and provider about the incident that occurred same day. Sister appreciative of the call and thanked us for taking care of [name of Resident 37.] On [DATE] at 11:17 a.m., the ED (Executive Director) provided the investigative file into the [DATE] incident referenced in the above note. It included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy and dignity during 1 of 1 care observations in which 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care and services did not have the door or privacy curtain closed in a manner to provide privacy and dignity during the process of transferring the resident from the wheelchair into their bed. (Resident C) Findings include:During an interview with a family member of Resident C on 6-2-26 at 4:15 p.m., Resident C was sitting in her wheelchair and indicated she wanted to lay down. During an observation on 6/2/26 at 4:15 p.m., CNA 3 and CNA 4 entered Resident C's room and transferred the resident from the wheelchair to the bed. The resident's privacy curtain was not pulled closed and the resident's door was not shut during this observation. Resident C's transfer was visible from the hallway of the facility. A review of Resident C's clinical record on 6-3-26 at 1:50 p.m., indicated her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia and a cerebral infarction (stroke) causing paralysis to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the use of a gait belt (device used to enhance safety during movement while assisting another person) during the transfer of 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care and services during 1 of 1 care observations. (Resident C) Findings include: During an interview with CNA 3 on 6-2-26 at 4:05 p.m., she indicated she was aware Resident C was a big fall risk, and had a history of falls. During an interview with a family member of Resident C on 6-2-26 at 4:15 p.m., Resident C was sitting in her wheelchair and indicated she wanted to lay down. During an observation on 6-2-26 at 4:15 p.m., CNA 3 and CNA 4 entered Resident C's room they were observed to don gloves, prior to beginning the care to transfer the resident from the wheelchair to her bed. CNA 3 and CNA 4 were observed to explain each step of the transfer from the wheelchair to the bed with Resident C. The staff members were observed to instruct Resident C to stand up with assistance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a urinary catheter bag or its tubing from coming in contact with the floor during 1 of 1 care observations for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care and services. (Resident C) Findings include:During an observation for Resident C on 6-2-26 at 4:15 p.m., CNA 3 and CNA 4, were observed to assist the resident to transfer from her wheelchair and into her bed. The staff were observed to have the bed at a level of comfort and ease for her to move from the wheelchair to her bed. The staff were observed to place her urinary catheter bag onto the right side of the bed frame and the bag and tubing were not in contact with the floor. Upon completion of the care, the staff were observed to lower Resident C's bed into its lowest position. The urinary catheter bag and its tubing were in contact with the floor. The staff were observed to to clean up the area and exit the room. During an interview with CNA 4 on 6-2-26 at 4:20 p.m., indicated Resident C's catheter bag and tubing should not be touching the floor. CNA 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have complete and accurate documentation for a resident's follow- up physician appointments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for physician appointments. (Resident C). Finding include:The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 6-2-26 at 2:42 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to unspecified dementia (mental decline), low back pain, unspecified disease of the spinal cord, spinal stenosis of the lumbar region with neurogenic claudication (narrowing of the spine causing pain in the legs and buttocks) and a history of falls. The Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident C, dated 3-26-26, indicated she was cognitively impaired and was unable to walk or ambulate independently, required the use of a wheelchair for mobility. A review of her clinical record indicated she was sent out to the hospital on [DATE], related to an altered mental status. Upon her discharge from the hospital, she returned to the facility. Her hospital discharge medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide administer medications for 15 of 28 residents reviewed who received medication from the second-floor west hall medication cart. (Resident E, Resident F, Resident G, Resident H, Resident K, Resident M, Resident N, Resident P, Resident R, Resident S, Resident V, Resident W, Resident X, Resident Y, Resident Z) Findings include:During an interview on 4/21/26 at 9:12 a.m., Resident E indicated he didn't have a nurse this past Sunday, on 4/19/26, during the day shift. Resident E did not get his day shift medications.During an interview on 4/21/26 at 2:49 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated on 4/19/26, a nurse called off of work and the other nurse that worked that unit did not administer medications to all the residents that were to receive medication from the second floor west hall medication cart.During an interview on 4/22/26 at 10:28 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 indicated, on 4/19/26 at approximately 9:00 a.m., she called the DON because a nurse called off work…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement procedures that assured the accurate accounting of controlled substance medications for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for controlled medication records. (West Hall second floor medication cart) Findings include:On 4/21/26 at 9:15 a.m., the change of shift-controlled medication count sheet, dated 4/1/26 through 4/21/26, for the second-floor west hall medication cart was reviewed. A review of the sheet indicated:- On 4/1/26 on first shift, the total items in cart box and the on-coming nurse signature box were left blank.- On 4/1/26 on second shift, the off-going nurse signature box was left blank, total items in cart box was left blank, and on-coming nurse box was left blank.- On 4/1/26 on third shift, the off-going nurse signature box was left blank and the total items in cart box was left blank.- On 4/2/26 on second and third shifts, the total items in cart box was left blank.- On 4/3/26 on first shift, the total items in cart box was left blank.- On 4/7/26 on first and third shifts, the total items in cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. A resident punched another resident repeatedly. (Resident B, Resident C) Finding includes:During an interview on 4/21/26 at 2:38 p.m., RN 1 indicated she worked, on 3/18/26, when Resident B had been sitting in the common area and all of the sudden, RN 1 heard someone yell. When she looked over, RN 1 saw Resident C standing over Resident B and punching Resident B in the head with a closed fist multiple times. Resident B was sent to the hospital because he had been punched in the head. The police came and took Resident C to be seen by psychiatric services.The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/20/26 at 10:07 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, down syndrome, pseudobulbar affect, and muscle weakness.An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/5/26, indicated Resident B was severely cognitively impaired.A progress note, dated 3/18/26 at 9:39 p.m., indicated Resident B…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. A resident's controlled narcotic pain medication was signed out while the resident was in the hospital. (Resident D) Finding includes:During an interview on 4/21/26 at 9:01 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated, on 3/22/26, he had been made aware that there were three tablets of Resident D's oxycodone/acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication) 10-325 mg (milligrams) missing from the cart. A staff member initialed that a tablet was removed on 3/18/26, and two tablets had been removed on 3/19/26. At the time those tablets were removed, Resident D was at the hospital. The facility was unable to identify to whom the initials belonged. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 4/20/26 at 11:14 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, morbid obesity, and adjustment disorder.A physician's order, initiated on 2/1/26, indicated give one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to timely have the interdisciplinary team (IDT) determine and document that self-administration of medications and treatments were clinically appropriate for 2 of 16 residents reviewed. (Resident B and Resident N)Findings include: 1.The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 3/10/26 at 11:30 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, personality disorder (behavior that deviates markedly from cultural expectations). A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/16/25, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact. A current physician's order, with a start date of 1/21/21, indicated Resident B was prescribed 81 milligrams of aspirin daily.A current physician's order, with a start date of 11/16/23, indicated Resident B was prescribed 2 capsules of 100 milligrams o docusate sodium twice a day. A current physician's order, with a start date of 10/18/24, indicated Resident B was prescribed 1000 milligrams of acetaminophen three times a day.A current physician's order, with a start…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident E).Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 3/10/26 at 11:15 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia (mental decline) and depression. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/8/26, indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident was able to make himself understood, understood others, and had no behaviors noted during the assessment period. A care plan, initiated on 1/19/26, indicated Resident E had impaired cognitive function or impaired thought process. The goals included, but were not limited to, the resident would remain oriented to person, place situation and time. Resident E's clinical record included a follow-up progress note, dated 2/26/26 at 12:27 p.m., that indicated the resident was being seen for a medication follow-up. Resident E had a resident-to-resident encounter during the past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document thorough investigations for allegations of abuse for 1 of 5 residents investigated for abuse (Resident F).Finding include: The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 3/10/26 at 1:10 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, Down Syndrome (genetic condition resulting in distinct physical features, developmental delays, and mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities). On 3/11/26 at 10:58 a.m., the Nurse Consultant (NC) provided a copy of the allegation of abuse investigation for Resident F for review. The investigation file contained an Incident Report, dated 12/27/25, that indicated Resident F had witnessed a verbal disagreement between Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 10 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 11. The immediate action taken was to suspend QMA 10 and CNA 11 pending outcome of the investigation. The investigation file did not contain statements from QMA 10 or CNA 11 about the verbal disagreement. On 3/11/26 at 12:58 p.m., the NC provided a written statement from QMA 10,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter was available for resident use for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident G)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident G was reviewed on 3/10/26 at 11:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paraplegia (paralysis of lower body) and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (loss of bladder control). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS Assessment, dated 2/18/26, indicated Resident G was cognitively intact. A care plan, dated 2/7/26, indicated the resident had the potential for infection due to the need for intermittent self-catheterization (resident will insert a tube to empty his bladder) related to neurogenic bladder. A physician's visit note, dated 2/13/26, indicated Resident G wanted to be seen due to urgent request regarding catheter supplies.patient reports he is running low on straight catheters and requires an order to prevent running out. He verbalizes concern that without appropriate supply he would be forced to reuse catheters,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure new behaviors were documented in the clinical record and to ensure staff were monitoring and tracking behaviors for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for call light response (Resident B and Resident D).Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 3/10/26 at 11:20 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia (mental decline) and bipolar disorder (a chronic mental health condition causing extreme shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels). A physician's order, dated 4/24/25, indicated Resident D's behavior was to be monitored each shift for delusions/hallucinations, tearfulness, crying, verbal expressions of sadness, anger, yelling, cursing, insomnia, anxiety, skin picking, and physical aggression. A Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 1/9/26, indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognition and had not displayed behaviors during the assessment period. A care plan, revised on 1/21/26, indicated Resident D had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure outdated items were discarded from the refrigerator timely, items were not open to air in the refrigerator, and the kitchen and kitchen equipment were clean with the potential to affect 50 of 51 residents residing at the facility.Findings include: On 12/9/25 at 9:45 a.m., the facility kitchen was observed with the Dietary Manager (DM). The walk-in refrigerator contained a silver pan of gelatin, dated 11/30/25, and a package of sliced cheese that was not sealed. The DM indicated the gelatin should be discarded and the cheese should have been wrapped completely and would be discarded. The kitchen floor had a film and did not appear to be clean. On 12/11/25 at 10:27 a.m., the facility kitchen was observed to have a dirty film and did not appear to have been mopped. On 12/11/25 at 12:35 p.m., the second-floor kitchenette was observed. The inside of the double-door refrigerator had dried food substances at the sides of the floor and a piece of fuzz stuck to the floor on the bottom of the interior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely discontinue an anti-psychotic medication as recommended by pharmacy and medial provider for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 7) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 12/9/25 at 3:00 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. A physician order, dated 9/15/25, indicated Resident 7 was to receive 0.25 milligrams of risperidone at night for agitation. A November 2025 pharmacy recommendation for Resident 7 indicated the medical provider needed to provide justification for the usage of the 0.25 milligrams of risperidone at bedtime for agitation. The medical provider responded with discontinuation of the 0.25 milligrams of risperidone at bedtime for Resident 7 as of 12/4/25. The staff was to monitor the resident for worsening symptoms. A medical provider note, dated 12/4/25, indicated the pharmacy had reviewed Resident 7's medications. The recommendation indicated that the resident does not have appropriate diagnosis to support…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a transfer form was sent with a resident who was transferred to an acute care hospital for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 2)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 12/10/25 at 11:00 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease and history of falling. An interview was conducted with Resident 2's Representative on 12/10/25 at 11:37 a.m. She indicated Resident 2 had been hospitalized for low blood sugar at the beginning of October. Resident 2's medical record did not include a transfer form for the resident being discharged to the hospital. Hospital records for Resident 2 were provided by the Nurse Consultant on 12/16/25 at 1:32 p.m. It indicated Resident 2 was brought in by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. The chief complaint was altered mental status. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan accurately reflected resident wishes regarding discharge and to ensure care plan meetings were held timely for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge care plans, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for notification of change, and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident 4, Resident 37, Resident 36, and Resident 20)1. The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed 12/12/2025 at 1:30 p.m. The medical diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes and polyneuropathy. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 9/4/2025, indicated Resident 4 was cognitively intact, had no active discharge planning, and did not want to speak to someone about returning to the community. A discharge care plan, dated 8/31/2023 and revised on 11/8/2025, indicated Resident 4 wanted to discharge home. The interventions included, but were not limited to, for staff to offer support and encouragement as needed. A progress note, dated 6/19/2025, indicated Resident 4 wished to stay in the facility and not discharge to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the optometry plan of care was implemented for a resident with glaucoma for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for vision services ( Resident 17).Finding include: The clinical record for Resident 17 was reviewed on 12/9/25 at 11:45 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, glaucoma.An Eye Care Chart Note, dated 4/11/25, indicated Resident 17 had blurred vision in the right and left eyes. The assessment and plan was to treat her open-angle glaucoma in both eyes with brimonidine 0.1% dorzolamide 2% (medication to treat high eye pressure) eye drops 1 drop into each eye twice daily and latanoprost 0.0005% eye drop (medication to treat open-angle glaucoma) one drop in both eyes at bedtime.A physician's order, dated 4/26/25, indicated she was to receive brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.2 % 1 drop into both eyes two times a day for glaucoma.The clinical record did not contain an order for latanoprost eye drops. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, completed 11/28/25, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to address a resident's (Resident 26) pain by ensuring availability of pain medications and implementing other pain relief interventions for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain management. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 26 was reviewed on 12/12/2025 at 1:30 p.m. The medical diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cancer and pneumonia.An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/13/2025, indicated Resident 26 was cognitively intact, frequently had pain, utilized as needed pain medication, and the severity raised to a 9/10.A pain care plan, dated 11/23/2025, indicated that Resident 26 was at risk for pain and discomfort. The interventions included for staff to administer pain medications as ordered and the use of non-pharmacological relief of pain. During an observation and interview, on 12/09/2025 11:53 AM, Resident 26 was laying in bed. He was observed to be rubbing his right thigh frequently and having facial grimacing. Resident 26 indicated he was having pain at 8/10 and could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the availability of a resident's seizure medication for 1 of 6 unnecessary medications reviewed. (Resident 58)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 58 was reviewed on 12/10/25 at 1:00 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anoxic brain injury (brain deprived of oxygen), tracheostomy (airway in neck) and epilepsy. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A physician's order, dated 12/9/25, indicated the resident was to receive 100 milligrams of lacosamide for seizures twice a day. The December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 58 indicated the following days and times the administration of 100 milligrams of lacosamide: -On 12/10/25 at 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., the medication was not available to be administered.-On 12/11/25 at 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., the medication was not available to be administered. -On 12/12/25 at 9:00 a.m., administered medication as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely address a pharmacy recommendation to discontinue a resident's medications for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 5) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 12/10/25 at 1:30 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A physician's order, dated 7/17/25, indicated Resident 5 was to receive 0.125 milligrams of hyoscyamine sulfate every 2 hours PRN (as needed). An October 2025 pharmacy recommendation indicated to discontinue unused PRN medications for Resident 5. The PRN 0.125 milligrams of hyoscyamine sulfate had not been used in the last 60 days. The pharmacy was recommending the medical provider to discontinue the medication. The medical provider as of 10/30/25 agreed to discontinue the medication. The November 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated Resident 5 was able to receive 0.125 milligrams of hyoscyamine Sulfate every 2 hours PRN. A November 2025 pharmacy recommendation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received mechanically altered diets, as ordered by the physician, for 3 residents randomly observed at meal service (Resident 25, Resident 31, and Resident 36).Findings include: 1 a. The clinical record for Resident 31 was reviewed on 12/11/25 at 12:55 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia. A physician's order, dated 12/4/23, indicated she was to receive a mechanical soft, ground meat texture diet. 1 b. The clinical record for Resident 25 was reviewed on 12/11/15 at 12:55 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dysphagia (inability to swallow). A physician's order, dated 7/31/24, indicated she was to receive a mechanical soft, ground meat texture diet. 1c. The clinical record for Resident 36 was reviewed on 12/9/25 at 2:20 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dysphagia. A physician's order, dated 7/22/25, indicated she was to receive a mechanical soft, chopped meat texture diet with nectar thick liquids. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' medical records were accurately documented for the administration of a resident's seizure medication and for the administration of a resident's eye drops for 1 of 6 unnecessary medications reviewed, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for vision services, and 1 or 3 reviewed for potential communication concerns. (Resident 58, Resident 17, and Resident 26) Findings include: 1.The clinical record for Resident 58 was reviewed on 12/10/25 at 1:00 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anoxic brain injury (brain deprived of oxygen), tracheostomy (airway in neck) and epilepsy. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A physician's order, dated 12/9/25, indicated the resident was to receive 100 milligrams of lacosamide for seizures twice a day. The December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 58 indicated the following days and times the administration of 100 milligrams of lacosamide: -On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility should ensure the indwelling urinary catheter bag remains free of contact with the floor, that hand hygiene was performed prior to donning gloves, and that the hub of an insulin pen was disinfected prior to attaching the needle, for 1 or 1 residents reviewed for urinary catheters and 1 of 5 residents randomly observed during medication pass . (Resident 8 and Resident 1) Findings include:Findings include: 1.The clinical record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 12/11/2025 at 3:00 p.m. Medical diagnosis include, but were not limited to, a stroke. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/11/2025, indicated Resident 8 was cognitively impaired and was frequently incontinent of bladder. A urological care plan, dated 11/12/2025, indicated Resident 8 had uropathy. Intervention included the use of a catheter. During an observation, on 12/09/2025 2:57 PM, Resident 8's indwelling urinary catheter bag was noted to be contacting the floor. During an observation, on 12/10/2025 1:21 PM, Resident 8's indwelling urinary catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer a resident's antipsychotic medication, as ordered; inform the physician/provider of the medication not having been administered; and implement and revise a resident's behavior care plan regarding refusal of care and medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for behavioral Health Services. (Resident B)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 10/28/25 at 2:42 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to: anxiety, paranoid schizophrenia, dementia, and depression. He was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after a 20-day inpatient psychiatric hospitalization. The Inpatient Psychiatric Hospital Discharge Medication Reconciliation, dated 9/23/25, indicated staff were to administer the resident's Uzedy (atypical antipsychotic medication) 75 mg/0.21ml subcutaneously every 30 days at 9:00 am. His last administration was on 9/18/25 at 9:59 a.m.The facility physician's orders indicated to administer the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a fall intervention was implemented timely after a fall event occurred and fall interventions were in place for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident D) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 4/16/25 at 11:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/9/25, indicated Resident D was moderately cognitively impaired and had two or more falls since the last MDS assessment. A care plan, revised 4/14/25, indicated Resident D was at risk for falls related to incontinence and psychoactive drug use. The interventions included, but were not limited to, anti-roll backs to the wheelchair, initiated on 4/14/25, and encourage the resident to wear nonskid footwear and/or nonskid socks, initiated on 3/11/25. A progress note, dated 4/13/25 at 10:46 p.m., indicated Resident D…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medication was administered per the physician orders, narcotic medication was readily available for use, and intravenous (IV) antibiotics were obtained to be administered as ordered by the physician for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for medication use. (Resident C and Resident D) Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 4/16/25 at 10:47 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis (infection of bone), pressure ulcer of sacral region, paraplegia, and muscle spasm. Resident C was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/6/25, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact, had one injection, utilized antianxiety medication, antibiotic medication, and opioid medication. A care plan for IV medications, revised 3/7/25, indicated Resident C was on IV antibiotics related to osteomyelitis. A physician order, dated 2/28/25, indicated to administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was conducted instead of abruptly discontinuing an antidepressant medication and antianxiety medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/16/25 at 9:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, dementia, anxiety disorder, alcohol abuse, and depression. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/17/25, indicated Resident B was cognitively impaired. A long-term care facility discharge medication summary, date of discharge 1/7/25, indicated Resident B received the following psychotropic medications: Start date: 10/21/24 - 0.5 milligrams of lorazepam (antianxiety/benzodiazepine) twice a day, Start date: 8/3/24 - 5 milligrams of Zyprexa (antipsychotic) three times a day, and Start date: 12/16/24 - 100 milligrams of sertraline (antidepressant)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's right for dignity to 2 of 5 residents reviewed for timely response to call lights and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for incontinence care by offering an incontinence brief. (Resident C and Resident F) Findings include: 1. In an interview with Resident C on 3-31-25 at 1:46 p.m., she indicated the minimum amount of time it took to get her call light answered was typically 30 minutes and this reflected all shifts, but especially night shift. She indicated she had been a resident of the facility for over five years. The clinical record of Resident C was reviewed on 3-31-25 at 12:05 p.m. Her most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 3-15-25, indicated she was cognitively intact. 2. In an interview with a family member of Resident F on 4-1-25 at 2:46 p.m., she indicated earlier in the day, the resident had activated the call light to request toileting assistance. She added the call light had been on for about 20 minutes when she (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician and family were notified in a timely manner of a significant weight loss in less than 30 days for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for gastric feedings. (Resident G) B. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician and family were notified in a timely manner of a new open area to a resident's neck for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for notification of change in condition. (Resident D) Findings include: A. During an interview on 4-1-25 at 3:56 p.m., with a family member of Resident G, she indicated during the previous night, she had spent the night in Resident G's room, at his request. She explained Resident G had several strokes during 2024, resulting in significant paralysis and an inability to swallow safely, thus causing him to require a feeding tube. The clinical record of Resident G was reviewed on 4-2-25 at 1:46 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for bathing and hygiene care needs. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 3-31-25 at 10:12 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pneumonia, unspecified cirrhosis of liver, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit and general muscle weakness. His admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12-12-24, indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired, required moderate assistance from staff for bathing or showering, and supervision from staff for hygiene care. In an interview with a family member of Resident B on 3-31-25 at 11:15 a.m., he indicated Resident B received very few showers while at the facility. A comprehensive care plan was not located in Resident B's clinical record for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) or specifically for bathing and hygiene care needs. In an interview on 4-1-25 at 9:40 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing and/or showering care for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for bathing and hygiene care needs. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 3-31-25 at 10:12 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pneumonia, unspecified cirrhosis of liver, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, and general muscle weakness. His admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12-12-24, indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired, required moderate assistance from staff for bathing or showering and supervision from staff for hygiene care and it was very important, for him to be able to choose what manner of bathing he received, such as tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. In an interview with a family member of Resident B on 3-31-25 at 11:15 a.m., he indicated Resident B received very few showers while at the facility. In an interview on 4-1-25 at 11:04 a.m., with the MDS Coordinator, she indicated It looks like I overlooked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving continuous enteral (gastric) feedings received feedings as ordered and a significant weight loss occurring in less than 30 days was identified and timely interventions related to the weight loss were conducted for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for gastric feedings. (Resident G) Findings include: During an interview on 4-1-25 at 3:56 p.m., with a family member of Resident G, she indicated during the previous night, she had spent the night in Resident G's room, at his request. She explained Resident G had several strokes during 2024, resulting in significant paralysis and an inability to swallow safely, thus causing him to require a feeding tube. She indicated sometime between 2:00 a.m. and 4:00 a.m., on 4-1-25, the continuous feeding had run out and it had not been resumed prior to her leaving the facility later that morning at 8:20 a.m. She indicated the nursing staff informed her the reason the feeding was not resumed was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly document information regarding the identification of a newly identified open area and information regarding notification of a change in condition to the family regarding the new open area for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tracheostomies (trach). (Resident D) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident D was reviewed on 4-1-25 at 11:01 a.m. It indicated his diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, metabolic encephalopathy, tracheostomy status and dysphagia. His most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1-25-25, indicated he was severely cognitively impaired, was nonverbal, nonambulatory, and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily care. It indicated he had a feeding tube and a tracheostomy, which required oxygen support and tracheostomy care, including suctioning. It indicated he did not have any pressure ulcers, but did have an open area to his feet and moisture associated skin damage. In an interview on 4-2-25 at 12:30 p.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) on duty for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect 49 of 49 residents in the facility. Findings include: The Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for the third quarter of the 2024 Federal Fiscal Year indicated the facility had no RN coverage hours on the following dates: 4/7/24, 4/20/24, 4/21/24, 5/4/24, 5/5/24, 5/18/24, 5/19/24, 5/27/24, 6/1/24, 6/2/24, 6/15/24, 6/16/24, and 6/30/24. On 10/3/24 at 10:20 a.m., the Administrator provided the Daily Nursing Schedule for the above dates. They, along with the time sheets for RN 9 provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), on 10/4/24 at 10:45 a.m., indicated there was no RN coverage on Saturday, 4/20/24, and Sunday, 4/21/24, but the schedule and time sheets did verify RN coverage for 4/7/24, 5/4/24, 5/5/24, 5/18/24, 5/19/24, 5/27/24, 6/1/24, 6/2/24, 6/15/24, 6/16/24, and 6/30/24. An interview was conducted with the Staffing Coordinator (SC) and the DON on 10/3/24 at 11:28 a.m. The SC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to hold food on a steam table at safe temperatures with the potential to affect 48 of 49 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 10/4/24 at 12:41 p.m., the lunch service was observed in the facility's main kitchen with Facility [NAME] (FC) 1. FC 1 indicated he was serving the room trays. The steam table contained a serving pan of mixed vegetables and a serving pan of [NAME] fish filets. The temperature of the mixed vegetables was obtained at 121.8 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The temperature of the [NAME] fish fillets was obtained at 107 degrees F. FC 1 indicated the temperature of the mixed vegetables, and the [NAME] fish filets should have been at least 135 degrees F. On 10/4/24 at 12:48 p.m., the lunch service was observed in the facility's upstairs kitchenette. FC 2 indicated he was finishing the upstairs dining room's food service. The steam table contained a serving pan of French fries. The temperature of the French fries…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications and collect urine samples as ordered, to timely schedule a follow-up appointment for a resident who was admitted with a healing leg fracture, and timely implement dietary recommendations for a resident with a feeding tube for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for mobility, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for feeding tubes, and 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 11, Resident 29, Resident 30, Resident 42, and Resident 95) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 42 was reviewed on 10/3/24 at 1:18 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of the lower femur (thighbone) and depression. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A physician's progress note, dated 9/10/24, indicated Resident 42 had recently admitted to the facility. She had a previous stay at another rehabilitation facility following a right femur fracture on 7/26/24. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-08 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 residents medical records included documentation that indicated the resident or resident representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccine; whether the COVID-19 vaccine was administered to the resident; or whether the resident did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine due to medical contraindications or refusal for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for COVID-19 immunization. (Residents 11, 18, 20, 24, and 30) Findings include: The clinical records for Residents 11, 18, 20, 24, and 30 were reviewed on 10/3/24 at 11:48 a.m. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 11's clinical record indicated he was last administered the COVID-19 vaccine on 7/7/22. There was no information in his clinical record that indicated Resident 11 or Resident 11's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the 2023-2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained by not sitting down while assisting a resident with eating for 1 of 1 resident randomly observed during dining. (Resident 2) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 10/7/24 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/10/24, indicated cognitive impairment. An Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan, revised 12/22/23, indicated she needed assistance with eating. An observation was conducted of Resident 2 in the dining room on 10/7/24 at 12:35 p.m. The resident was observed sitting at a table in the dining room. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was standing next to the resident's table assisting the resident with eating her meal. An interview was conducted with the Nurse Consultant (NC) on 10/7/24 at 3:30 p.m. She indicated CNA 1 should have been sitting while assisting Resident 2 with her meal. A resident rights policy was provided by the NC on 10/8/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely address a resident's grievance for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for choices. (Resident 11) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 10/3/24 at 9:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/12/24, indicated Resident 11 was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted with Resident 11 on 10/3/24 at 9:41 a.m. He indicated he had been storing a Tupperware container that contained his tea pot and tea bags in a cabinet in the dining room for years. He was told a couple of days ago; he no longer was allowed to do that anymore. He had to store the Tupperware container in his room and take it back-an-forth from his room to the dining room every meal. It made it difficult. He was never given a reason why he could no longer store the container in the dining room. The resident had told everyone he was not happy about it. He had worked really hard to be able to use his crutches, but now he had to get back in the wheelchair. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was correctly completed, related to falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 1-25-24 at 12:12 p.m. It indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, unspecified encephalopathy, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, depression, high blood pressure, unspecified signs and symptoms of cognitive function, general muscle weakness and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Her admission MDS assessment, dated 10-9-23, under section J, indicated the facility was unable to determine if she had any falls or fractures in the 6 month period prior to her admission to the facility. It indicated she had sustained no falls from the time of her admission through the assessment reference date (ARD) of 10-9-23. A review of the clinical record from the date of admission and through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances reported were addressed that included resolutions. This had a potential to affect 6 of 6 resident council members and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for food. (Resident's 4, 13, 14, 22, 31, 35, 44) Findings include: 1. The May, June, and July 2023 Resident Council Minutes were provided by the Executive Director on 8/7/23 at 11:01 a.m. The May and June 2023 Resident Council Minutes indicated the council had concerns with alternative food choices that are not listed on the menu. The staff were not asking the residents what they would like to eat. The council minutes did not include resolutions to the concerns addressed in May or June. The July 2023 Resident Council Minutes did not include resolutions to the concerns addressed in May or June. A resident council meeting was conducted on 8/07/23 at 11:29 a.m. Resident 4, Resident 22, Resident 14, Resident 44, Resident 13, and Resident 35 attended the meeting. The council indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were able to file a grievance anonymously. This had a potential to effect 48 of 48 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: A resident council meeting was conducted on 8/07/23 at 11:29 a.m. Resident 4, Resident 22, Resident 14, Resident 44, Resident 13, and Resident 35 attended the meeting. The council indicated the residents have to report to a staff person to file a grievance or a concern. They are unable to file a grievance anonymously. An interview was conducted with the Activities Director on 8/11/23 at 8:43 a.m. She indicated the residents notify the staff when he or she has a grievance or a concern needed to be addressed. The staff fill out a paper and turn it in to Social Services Director (SSD). An observation was made with the SSD on 8/11/23 at 8:43 a.m. An observation was made of the copy room with the SSD on the 1st floor. The grievances forms were located in a folder on the wall. The SSD indicated the staff fill them out for the residents. A resident with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse to the Administrator; notify a resident's representative of the initiation and progress of an abuse investigation; and include pertinent information regarding an alleged victim of an abuse allegation and ensure accurate and detailed description in their state reporting for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents 20 and 37 and 40) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 37 was reviewed on 8/7/23 at 3:00 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia. She resided on the memory care unit of the facility until 6/29/23. The 5/26/23 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated she had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 5, indicating she was severely cognitively impaired. The 6/29/23, 7:18 p.m. nurses note, recorded as a late entry on 7/6/23, read, Writer notified sister [name of sister] and provider about the incident that occurred same day. Sister…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely create a baseline care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for care planning (Resident 200). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 200 was reviewed on 8/7/23 at 10:07 a.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, hypertension and anxiety. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 7/29/23 at 7:30 a.m., indicated Resident 200 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time and able to make all needs and wants known. During an interview on 8//7/23 at 10:07 a.m., Resident 200 indicated that no one had gone over his baseline care plan with him. On 8/8/23 at 11:30 a.m., the DON (Director of Nursing) provided Resident 200's Baseline Care Plan which indicated that sections 1 through 3 had been completed on 8/8/23. During an interview on 8/09/23 at 2:54 p.m., the MDSC (Minimum Data Set Coordinator) indicated that she tried to do the baseline care plan within the first 48 to 72 hours of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to create a discharge planning care plan for a resident with a goal of returning to the community at discharge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge, to develop care plans for refusal of bathing and shampooing and a resident high risk for dehydration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living and 1 of 1 residents reviewed of hydration. (Resident 14 and Resident 27 and Resident 202) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 27 was reviewed on 8/7/23 at 9:05 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia. A dehydration risk assessment for Resident 27 dated 6/12/23 indicated a total score of above 8 represents high risk - prevention protocol should be initiated immediately and documented on the care plan. The resident's assessment indicated a score of 10. The assessment indicated the resident was bed bound, totally dependent, incontinent of urine, had predisposing factors and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely update toileting care plans for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for bladder and bowel incontinence (Resident 4). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 8/7/23 at 11:12 a.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, generalized muscle weakness and constipation. A care plan, last revised on 12/13/22, indicated that Resident 4 needed extensive to total assist with transfers. The goal was for her to feel safe and secure with using mechanical lift for transfers and for her to feel secure with staff providing major support for transfers with some support. The interventions included, but were not limited to, assess for increase in mobility level and/or decrease in mobility level, initiated 6/10/2019, and to use mechanical lift for transfers, revised on 11/8/22. A care plan, last revised on 12/13/22, indicated Resident 4 needed extensive assistance with toileting, bed mobility, and eating. The goal was for her to be able to feed herself after set up and for her to feel safe and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure discharge need for oxygen therapy was identified and to involve the interdisciplinary team to develop a plan of treatment for discharge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident B). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/8/23 at 9:38 a.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, COVID-19 infection, hypothyroidism, and chronic respiratory failure. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 5/29/23. A care plan, initiated 3/13/23, indicated Resident B planned to remain in the facility for long term placement. She understood the need for long term placement, however, would want to return home if given the option to return to the community. The goal was for her to have 24-hour care and supervision while she was in the facility. The intervention, dated 3/13/23, that Resident B's family and Resident B preferred to discuss a return to community unless…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written discharge plan of care to a resident with a planned discharge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident B). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/8/23 at 9:38 a.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, COVID-19 infection, hypothyroidism, and chronic respiratory failure. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 5/29/23. A Practitioner Progress Note, dated 5/3/23, indicated Resident B was scheduled to discharge to another state on May 29, 2023. A Physician/Practitioner Progress Note, dated 5/23/23 at 1:13 p.m., indicated that Resident B was being seen to discuss discharge plans. Resident B planned to discharge on [DATE]. A 30-day supply of medications would be sent to a local pharmacy, seven days of controlled meds would be sent with the patient upon discharge, and that discharge paperwork was to be given to Resident B upon departure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing and hair shampooing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living and to timely order a toileting sling to assist a resident with toileting for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for bladder and bowel incontinence (Resident 4 and Resident 14). 1. The clinical record for Resident 14 was reviewed on 8/7/23 at 12:05 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease. A care plan dated 5/23/23 indicated Resident 14 was cognitively impaired. An Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 14 was cognitively impaired. A care plan dated 9/19/22 indicated Resident 14 has a preference that it was important to her to choose bathing. The intervention for bathing was the resident preferred a tub bath twice a week. The clinical record did not include a developed care plan and interventions in place to address refusals of bathing and shampooing. A July 2023 bath report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer a resident's medication, as ordered, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain and 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and to ensure monitoring and addressing wounds and providing skin treatment to dry skin for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for wounds. (Residents' 24, 31 and B) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 31 was reviewed on 8/7/23 at 10:45 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, herpes viral vesicular dermatitis. The 5/29/23 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated she had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status score) of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. The at risk for skin breakdown care plan, revised 9/21/22, indicated an intervention was to administer vitamins and minerals as ordered. The physician's orders indicated to administer one 1000 mg tablet of L-Lysine one time a day, starting 5/24/23. An observation of Resident 31 was made on 8/7/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement residents' fall interventions for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents and 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. (Resident 21 and Resident 37) 1. The clinical record for Resident 37 was reviewed on 8/7/23 at 3:00 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia. She resided on the memory care unit of the facility until 6/29/23, when she moved to the upstairs unit of the facility. The 5/26/23 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated she had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 5, indicating she was severely cognitively impaired. The fall risk care plan, revised 8/10/21, indicated an intervention was for her to be a 2 person assist with transfers, starting 5/11/23, and to wrap her call light in bright colored tape so it can be seen easily, starting 8/10/21. An observation of Resident 37's call light in her room was made on 8/10/23 at 10:50 a.m. Her call light was hanging on the wall above her bed. It did not have brightly colored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to clarify oxygen services for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 3) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 8/7/23 at 11:03 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A care plan dated 2/17/21 indicated Resident 3 requires oxygen. The interventions put in place indicated the staff was to administer oxygen as ordered. A physician order dated 1/20/23 indicated Resident 3 was to wear 2 liters of oxygen continuously. The staff may remove oxygen during showers and at the hair salon. An observation was made on 8/6/23 at 12:12 p.m. Resident 3 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in the common area. She was not wearing oxygen. An observation was made of Resident 3 on 8/10/23 at 1:30 p.m. Resident 3 was observed in her room sitting in her wheelchair. She was not wearing oxygen. An observation was made of Resident 3 with the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) on 8/12/23 at 2:02 p.m. Resident 3 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychoactive and narcotic medications were administered as ordered; review and implement a resident's individualized mental health safety plan post inpatient psychiatric stay; and adequately monitor and address a resident's ongoing behaviors resulting in increased behaviors, increased anxiety, and interference of peers' daily routine and environment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 45) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 45 was reviewed on 8/7/23 at 2:17 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, opioid dependence with intoxication, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, psychoactive substance abuse, personality disorder, and stroke. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An Admissions MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 45 was cognitively impaired. Individualized Mental Health Safety Plan created at Psychiatric Hospital dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent for 1 of 5 residents observed during medication pass. There were 25 opportunities with 2 errors resulting in an 8 % medications error rate. The errors involved 1 resident (Resident 45) in the sample of 5. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 45 was reviewed on 8/7/23 at 2:17 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, opioid dependence with intoxication, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, personality disorder, and stroke. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An Admissions MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 45 was cognitively impaired. A physician's order, dated 6/12/23, indicated Resident 45 was to receive Buprenorphine sublingual tablet 2 mg to be given three times a day. A physician's order, dated 6/9/23, indicated to give memantine hydrochloride (medication for memory) 10mg daily. The order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store controlled medication under double lock in 1 of 2 medication rooms. Findings include: On 8/11/23 at 10:44 a.m., the 200-hall medication room was observed with QMA 4. The refrigerator in the medication room contained an unlocked metal lock box for the storage of refrigerated controlled substances. The metal lock box contained liquid lorazepam for 3 residents of the second floor. QMA 4 indicated that the box should have been locked while being stored in the refrigerator. During an interview on 8/11/23 at 11:51 a.m., the DON (Director of Nursing Services) indicated the lorazepam should have been stored in a locked container in the refrigerator. On 8/11/23 at 11:51 a.m., the DON provided the Medication Storage in The Facility policy, dated February 2017, which read .All drugs classified as Schedule II of the Controlled Substances Act will be stored under double locks . 3.1-25(n)

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a corrective plan of action that included monitoring, tracking, evaluating effectiveness for an identified concern area, abuse. This affected 3 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. This had a potential to effect 48 of 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings include: An interview was conducted with the Executive Director (ED) on 8/7/23 at 10:00 a.m. The ED indicated the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee met monthly regularly. One deficiency that was identified during this recertification and complaint survey on 8/6/23 through 8/11/23, was cited at harm level - F600 - G. Abuse: 1 resident was verbally abused by a staff person while providing incontinent care. 2 residents were verbally and mentally abused by a staff person that refused to honor residents' preference to return to their room and lay down. A fourth resident was sexually abused by her roommate that inappropriately touched her while she was sleeping. There was no evidence the facility had developed or implemented an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-10-08 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) accurate direct care staffing information regarding the correct category of work for a Registered Nurse for 49 of 49 residents in the facility. Findings include: The Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for the third quarter of the 2024 Federal Fiscal Year indicated the facility had no RN coverage hours on the following dates: 4/7/24, 4/20/24, 4/21/24, 5/4/24, 5/5/24, 5/18/24, 5/19/24, 5/27/24, 6/1/24, 6/2/24, 6/15/24, 6/16/24, and 6/30/24. On 10/3/24 at 10:20 a.m., the Administrator provided the Daily Nursing Schedule for the above dates. They, along with the time sheets for RN 9 provided by the DON (Director of Nursing), on 10/4/24 at 10:45 a.m., indicated there was RN coverage on 4/7/24, 5/4/24, 5/5/24, 5/18/24, 5/19/24, 5/27/24, 6/1/24, 6/2/24, 6/15/24, 6/16/24, and 6/30/24. An interview was conducted with the Staffing Coordinator (SC) and the DON on 10/3/24 at 11:28 a.m. The SC indicated she'd been the staffing coordinator for almost three years.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident 1, 12, 22, and 42). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 10/7/24 at 12:31 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paraplegia. The admission MDS assessment, dated 8/18/24, indicated Resident 1 had bed rails used as a restraint daily. 2. The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 10/7/24 at 12:40 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. The Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 9/13/24, indicated Resident 12 had bed rails used as a restraint daily. 3. The clinical record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 10/7/24 at 12:48 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension. The Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 8/31/24, indicated Resident 22 had bed rails used as a resident daily. 4. The clinical record for Resident 42 was reviewed on 10/7/24 at 12:55 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression. The admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
The other 68 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alpha Home - A Waters CommunityIndianapolis, IN 1 of 5Belhaven Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Continental Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Heritage Place Care & Rehabilitation LLCWinchester, TN 1 of 5Hope Creek Nursing & RehabEast Moline, IL 1 of 5Landmark Of Richton Park Rehab & Nsg CtrRichton Park, IL 1 of 5Landmark at 95th Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Hyde Park Rehabilitation and Nursing CChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Itasca Rehabilitation and Nursing CentItasca, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Lincoln Park Rehabilitation and NursinChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Oak Lawn Rehabilitation and Nursing CeOak Lawn, IL 1 of 5Momence Meadows Nursing & RehabMomence, IL 1 of 5Parker Nursing & Rehab CenterStreator, IL 1 of 5The Waters Of Smyrna, LLCSmyrna, TN 1 of 5The Waters Of Springfield LLCSpringfield, TN 1 of 5Waters Of Clifty Falls, TheMadison, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Covington, TheCovington, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Dillsboro-Ross Manor, TheDillsboro, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Georgetown, TheGeorgetown, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Hobart Skilled Nursing Facility, TheHobart, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Lebanon, TheLebanon, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Martinsville, TheMartinsville, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing CtrMemphis, TN 1 of 5Waters Of Princeton, ThePrinceton, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Rockport Skilled Nursing Facility, TheRockport, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Scottsburg, TheScottsburg, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Sullivan Nursing Facility, TheSullivan, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Syracuse Skilled Nursing Facility, TheSyracuse, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Tipton Skilled Nursing Facility, TheTipton, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Wabash Skilled Nursing Facility East TheWabash, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Wakarusa Skilled Nursing Facility, TheWakarusa, IN 1 of 5Westpark A Waters CommunityIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Ambassador Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 2 of 5Midway Neurological / Rehab CenterBridgeview, IL 2 of 5The Waters Of Cheatham, LLCAshland City, TN 2 of 5The Waters Of GallatinGallatin, TN 2 of 5The Waters Of Johnson City, LLCJohnson City, TN 2 of 5Waters Of Batesville, TheBatesville, IN 2 of 5Waters Of Dunkirk Skilled Nursing Facility, TheDunkirk, IN 2 of 5Waters Of Greencastle, TheGreencastle, IN

Showing 40 of 68; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2013
CRAWLEY, LASHELLEIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/09/2022
PETERSON, JANCEIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2016
DECOLA, ROBERTIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/16/2019
BERKHOUSE, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/18/2021
DUNKLE, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2019
MILLER'S HEALTH SYSTEMS INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2013
THE WATERS OF CASTLETON SKILLED NURSING FACILITY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$602K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 6%Other / private 18%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $602K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$394per resident / day
operating cost
$11,963per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$387per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155271. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next