Waters Of Scottsburg, The
1350 N Todd Dr, Scottsburg, IN 47170 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (812) 752-5663 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $45,372 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-18)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.9% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.7% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 33.2% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.9% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.6% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 51.9% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.3% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 3.6% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.3% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.9% | 13.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.1% | 79.0% | 79.4% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.9%CMS range 41.0–68.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 7.0–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 4.7–14.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 74.0 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
68 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was in place when a resident (Resident B) with impaired cognition and risk for elopement was left outside without staff supervision. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 4/25/26 when Resident B, with cognitive impairment and elopement risk, propelled himself from the facility grounds to a heavily traveled road where the resident fell out of his wheelchair landing on the pavement in the emergency lane which was 0.2 miles from the facility. The resident was sent to the emergency room and treated for an abrasion to his right foot and right hand. The Executive Director (ED) and Director of Nursing (DON), Regional Director of Operations (RDO) and Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 4/28/26 at 3:33 p.m. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/28/26 at 11:18 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction (the pathologic process…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was in place when a resident (Resident G) with impaired cognition and risk for elopement exited the front doors without staff supervision. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 12/7/23. Resident G is a [AGE] year-old male with severely impaired cognition and risk for elopement that had resided on the dementia unit since 7/12/23. The resident was admitted to a psychiatric hospital on [DATE]. He readmitted to the facility on [DATE] at 11:30 a.m., off the dementia unit, as a trial for the safety of the other residents on the dementia unit. The resident exited the facility through the front doors on 12/7/23 between 5:20 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. when a visitor exited the facility. At 5:43 p.m. on 12/7/23, the visitor returned and informed the facility she thought she had let a resident out of the facility. The resident was found by the maintenance director 0.8 miles from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility management failed to timely report an incident to the Indiana Department of Health when a cognitively impaired resident (Resident B) with a high risk for elopement exited the facility grounds, without supervision, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for reportable incidents. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/28/26 at 11:18 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction (stroke), aphasia, cognitive communication deficit and altered mental status. The incident report, dated 4/28/26, indicated on 4/25/26, Resident B attempted to leave the facility, against medical advice, by exiting the front doors. Resident B propelled himself, in his wheelchair, off of the property and fell out of the wheelchair. The admission BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) assessment, dated 4/10/26, indicated the resident had a cognitive impairment. Residents with impaired cognition cannot leave a facility against medical advice. The elopement risk assessment, dated 4/24/26 at 1:23 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was in place for a resident (Resident C) with an indwelling catheter for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 4/29/26 at 12:07 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, Stage 4 pressure ulcer (severe, full thickness wound involving extensive tissue loss, exposing muscle, tendon or bone) to the sacrum. On 4/29/26 at 8:50 p.m., the resident was observed with an Indwelling urinary catheter in place. The physician's order, dated 4/8/26, indicated the resident was to receive catheter care every shift. The clinical record lacked documentation of catheter care provided to the resident between 4/9/26 and 4/29/26. During an interview, during the survey period, Staff Member 13 indicated indwelling urinary catheter care should be provided every shift and documented. On 4/30/26 at 4:00 p.m., the Regional Director of Operations provided a current copy of the document titled Guidelines for Indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident C) IV (intravenous) antibiotic therapy was reflected on the medication administration record, as ordered by the physician, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for IV medication administration. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 4/29/26 at 12:07 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, osteomyelitis (a serious bone infection causing inflammation and potential tissue death, usually triggered by bacteria spreading from nearby wounds, surgery, or the bloodstream). During an observation, on 4/29/26 at 8:50 a.m., Resident C was observed with a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line to the right upper extremity. The physician's order, dated 4/8/26, indicated the resident was to receive Vancomycin (A powerful antibiotic used to treat serious infections) HCl (hydrochloride) 1.25 grams, intravenously two times a day at 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. for osteomyelitis. The April 2026 medication administration record lacked documentation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring was in place for a resident (Resident B) with exit-seeking behaviors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for behaviors. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/28/26 at 11:18 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction (the pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain) and cognitive communication deficit (communication impairment).The care plan, dated 4/24/26, indicated the resident was at risk for elopement related to periods of confusion, unable to verbally express needs, making statements that was going to leave and go home and did not want to be at facility. The IDT (interdisciplinary team) note, dated 4/27/26 at 3:57 p.m., indicated the following:-Resident had demonstrated a consistent pattern of expressing a desire to leave the facility, which included gesturing and behaviors indicative of exit-seeking-On 4/19/26, the resident left the faciity on LOA (leave of absence) with a family friend. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner during 3 of 3 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 63 or 63 residents. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen, on 4/7/26 at 10:23 a.m., while accompanied by the Dietary Manager, the following concerns were observed:-The left-side metal table near the dishwasher in the dish room had a large accumulation of brown water with egg particles floating in the water.-The outside of three glass coffee decanters sitting on the coffee pot bases were covered with a white sticky film.-The floor had a dried sticky spill in front of the long metal prepping table.-The floor had a dried sticky spill at the entrance to the kitchen. -The stovetop burners had a heavy accumulation of black crust on them.-There was a large accumulation of debris and dust underneath the food storage shelving in the dry storage room.-The walk-in freezer had a condenser pipe wrapped in a foam tube and covered with black tape. There was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the residents' medication status for 1 of 21 resident MDS reviewed for accuracy of assessments. (Resident 10).Findings include: The record for Resident 10 was reviewed on 4/7/26 at 1:14 p.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, moderate depressive disorder, recurrent (a serious, common mental health condition characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities and low energy which lasted at least 2 weeks).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident had slight impairment in cognition, frequently felt down or depressed and felt tired. The MDS, medication section, indicated the resident was marked as not having used any anti-depressants.A physician's order, dated 11/24/25, indicated the resident was to take 1 tablet of mirtazapine (Remeron - anti-depressant medication) tablet 15 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for depression.An interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation on the Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form of administered narcotics for 2 of 46 residents observed for pharmacy services. (Residents 7 and 68) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 4/9/26 at 10:25 a.m., the Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form indicated Resident 7's Pregabalin (used to treat anxiety and neuropathic pain) was documented as administered on 4/9/26 at 8:00 a.m., by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4. The count on the sheet indicated 25 capsules left. The medication card indicated 26 capsules left. During an interview, on 4/9/26 at 10:28 a.m., LPN 4 indicated she thought she had administered the medication that morning. She could not explain why the count was off. At 10:48 a.m., LPN 4 indicated the administration range of Resident 7's Pregabalin was between 7:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m., and she had not administered the medication, so she wasn't late to administer it. She then indicated she should not have signed the narcotic out before administering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure glucometers were cleaned per guidelines for infection control when obtaining blood sugar readings for 2 of 3 residents observed. (Residents 29 and 7) Findings include:1. During an observation, on 4/9/26 at 8:05 a.m., Resident, 29's accu check (glucometer - machine used for blood sugar monitoring) was completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4. The resident's blood sugar was 254 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). The LPN brought the glucometer back to the medication cart and placed it into the resident's case without cleaning it. LPN 4 obtained the insulin and administered it to the resident. She then went onto her computer to check off the medication and went on to her next resident. The record for Resident 29 was reviewed on 4/10/26 at 10:09 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar) with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage caused by long-term high blood sugar). The physician's order, dated 11/11/25, indicated staff were to perform accu…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facial hair covering were in place for staff while working for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. Findings include:Upon entrance into the kitchen, on 3/15/26 at 12:14 p.m., signage on the kitchen door indicated staff must have hairnets in place and beard guards in place to enter the kitchen. During an observation on 3/15/26 at 12:16 p.m., Dietary Aide (DA) 6 and Dishwasher 7 both had 1/2 inch or longer facial hair on their lip and chin area. The DA 6 and Dishwasher 7 were observed in the kitchen dish and food prep areas without beard guards in place. During an interview, on 3/15/26 at 12:19 p.m., the Dietary Manager indicated they had just run out of the beard guards, however, it was the facility policy for beard guards to be in place while in the kitchen. On 3/15/26 at 3:00 p.m., the Executive Director provided a current copy of the document titled Proper Use of Hairnets and [NAME] Guards for Food Safety Compliance which was last reviewed on 6/2/25. It included, but was not limited to, Purpose .To ensure all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from resident to resident abuse for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 3/15/26 at 2:04 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia (chronic, severe brain disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and acts), depression, suicidal ideations, and vascular dementia (mental decline). The incident report, dated 3/13/26 at 1:01 p.m., indicated Resident C entered Resident B's room. Resident B, upset, placed hands on Resident C's shoulders to turn her around and slightly pushed her from the back. The progress note, dated 3/13/26 at 1:16 p.m., indicated Resident C entered Resident B's room. Resident B placed his hands on Resident C's shoulder, turned her around and pushed her from the back. During an interview, on 3/15/26 at 12:00 p.m., Staff Member 8 indicated on 3/12/26 in the late afternoon/early evening,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medication was not administered to a resident (Resident K) outside of prescribed parameter blood pressure for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident K was reviewed on 3/17/26 at 11:15 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypotension (low blood pressure). The physician's order, dated 2/14/26, indicated the resident was to receive Midodrine 10 mg, via gastrostomy tube, three times a day at 6:00 a.m., 2:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. for hypotension. The medication was to be held (not administered) for a systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 110. Review of the February 2026 medication administration record indicated the medication was administered on the following dates and times:-On 2/16/26 at 10:00 p.m., when the resident's SBP was 122,-On 2/17/26 at 6:00 a.m., when the resident's SBP was 126,-On 2/17/26 at 10:00 p.m., when the resident's SBP was 119, and-On 2/19/26 at 6:00 a.m., when the resident's SBP was 119. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the hall meal service food was held at an appropriate temperature for 2 of 2 observations; failed to ensure the food was not overcooked for 1 of 2 meal service observations; and failed to ensure residents received adequate portions for 7 of 10 residents reviewed for dietary services. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 73 of 78 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:During a kitchen food service observation, on 3/15/26 at 12:25 p.m., the following was observed:-The meatloaf was observed with blackened areas across the top and along the edges in the pan.-The serving portion of the meatloaf provided to the residents measured 3 inches in length, one inch in width with a depth of one inch. During an interview, on 3/15/26 at 1:20 p.m., the Executive Director indicated she was going to have the outsourced Dietary Manager re-educate the kitchen staff on portion sizes. During an interview, on 3/16/26 at 11:40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-18 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a variety of snacks and snacks with nutritional value were available for the residents for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for dietary services. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 73 of 78 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:During an observation of the snack pantry on 3/15/26 at 11:00 a.m., the following was observed:-One jar of peanut butter on the counter next to the refrigerator-There was no bread in the pantry-A tray with 4 peanut butter sandwiches and 2 peanut butter and jelly sandwiches in baggies. The crust of the bread was hard. There were no other snacks observed in the pantry for the residents except what the residents had purchased for themselves. On 3/15/26 at 11:05 a.m., small bags of cheez-its were the only snacks observed on the snack cart. During an interview, on 3/16/26 at 10:35 a.m., Resident N indicated they don't have snacks all the time and sometimes don't get offered snacks at night because the staff do not have anything to give them. They had peanut…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident E) was informed of a decrease in pain medication; failed to ensure a resident's (Resident M) representative was notified of the discontinuation of therapy services; and failed to ensure a resident's (Resident E) follow-up appointment for suture removal status post amputation was set-up for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. Findings include:1 The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 3/15/26 at 2:27 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, orthopedic after care following surgical amputation, diabetes, chronic pain, depression, acquired absence of left leg above knee and myalgia (pain). The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 2/2/26, indicated Resident E's cognition was intact. The hospital history and physical note, dated 1/29/26, indicated Resident E had a left above knee amputation on 1/16/26. The hospital discharge orders, dated 1/29/26, indicated the resident had a follow-up appointment with the vascular nurse practitioner on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate information was provided to the abuse coordinator for an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse; failed to ensure an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse was reported to the abuse coordinator; and failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was reported, in a timely manner, for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B, Resident C and Resident D) Findings include:1.On 3/15/26 at 12:00 p.m., Staff Member 8 indicated on 3/12/26 in the late afternoon/early evening, Staff Member 8 overheard Resident B tell Resident C he was going to kill her if Resident C came in his room. Staff Member 8 reported the incident to the Director of Nursing who then told Staff Member 8 to inform Social Services. When Staff Member 8 reported the incident to Social Services, Social Services asked Staff Member 8 what do you want me to do about it. On 3/15/25 at 12:05 p.m., Staff Member 9 indicated on 3/13/26 at around 1:00 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring was in place for a resident (Residents E, G and K) on anticoagulant therapy and monitoring was in place for a resident (Resident E and Resident F) on insulin 4 of 4 residents reviewed for pharmacy procedures. Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 3/15/26 at 2:47 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes (persistently high blood sugar levels) and status post left above knee amputation. The admission order, dated 1/29/26, indicated the resident was to receive the following medications:-Aspirin (blood thinner) 81 mg (milligrams) daily-Insulin Lispro (long-acting insulin) 5 units subcutaneously with meals-Xarelto (blood thinner) 20 mg daily with breakfast Review of the resident's January, February, and March 2026 medication administrations lacked documentation of nursing staff monitoring the resident for signs/symptoms of bleeding for the blood thinners and for signs/symptoms of hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia for the insulin. 2. The clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the walls in the closet in a resident's (Resident B) room were clean and free of debris and failed to ensure the closet door was safely intact for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for environment. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 3/15/26 at 2:04 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow, making it difficult to breath). On 3/17/26 at 10:20 a.m., the following observations were made in Resident B's room:-The sliding door to the closet was observed off the track and leaning up against the right side of the closet. Standing inside the closet looking out towards the room the right upper wall in the closet was observed with multiple gray/black spotted areas that extended across the width of the wall and extended 10 inches downward. The interior wall, above the closet entrance, had a large area, from top to bottom, of gray/black spotted areas.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident B) medication administration record reflected the administration of narcotic medication; and failed to ensure physician visits for residents' (Resident B, Resident D, Resident E and Resident F) were uploaded, in a timely manner for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for medical records. Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/23/26 at 11:07 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, subarachnoid hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, paraplegic (Paralysis affecting the lower half of the body), and traumatic brain injury (brain dysfunction). The physician's order, dated 10/9/25, indicated the resident was to receive Modafinil (medication to improve wakefulness) 100 mg (milligrams) daily at 8:00 a.m.Review of the November 2025 medication administration (MAR) and the November 2025 controlled substance record indicated the following:-On 11/04/25 the MAR reflected the administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident F) dignity was maintained for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights.Findings include:The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 1/28/26 at 3:20 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression and anxiety. The quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 12/23/25, indicated the resident's cognition was intact.The incident report, dated 1/28/26 at 1:10 p.m., indicated Resident F reported that the Social Services Designee (SSD) came into her room with Resident G, and pulled Resident F's privacy curtain open hastily. The SSD then stated to Resident G, see, she [Resident F] is a woman. SSD then told Resident F that she needed to shave her face. Resident F told the SSD not to pull open her privacy curtain without asking.During an interview, on 1/28/26 at 1:30 p.m., Resident F indicated a few days ago that a new roommate (Resident G) moved into the room with her. After a short time, Resident F introduced herself to Resident G. A few hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident B) blood pressure medication was not administered, as ordered by the physician when out of parameters, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/23/26 at 11:07 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, atrial fibrillation.The physician's order, dated 10/9/25, indicated the resident was to receive Propranolol (medication used for an irregular heartbeat) HCL (hydrochloride), 20 mg (milligrams) three times a day at 8:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. The medication was to be held if the resident's systolic (top) blood pressure (SBP) was less than 110.Review of the November 2025, December 2025 and January 2026 indicated the resident was administered the Propranolol medication when parameter readings were out of the range to administer on the following dates and times:-On 11/17/25 at 8:00 a.m., when the resident's SBP was 106.-On 11/17/25 at 12:00 p.m., when the resident's SBP was 106.-On 11/17/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room was adequately equipped with an individual call system device to allow the resident to call for assistance if needed for 1 of 3 residents call systems reviewed. (Resident C)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 1/23/26 at 1:52 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anoxic brain injury (the brain was completely deprived of oxygen, causing cells to die), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (life-threatening condition where the lungs fail to oxygenate the blood) and hypercapnia 9the buildup of too much carbon dioxide in the bloodstream) and anxiety.The care plan, dated 1/13/26, indicated the resident was at risk for falls and to place the resident's call light within reach.During an observation, on 1/28/26 at 1:26 p.m., Resident C was observed resting in bed with eyes closed. Resident C did not have his call light in place. A single call cord was observed in the room with the only call cord in place for the resident's roommate.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was evolved in aspects of his care related to a room change, and the temporary removal of his cell phone, from his possession without his consent, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for the right to make treatment decisions. (Resident B) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/8/26 at 2:28 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, major depressive disorder, bipolar and anxiety. The 11/25/25 quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated Resident B had intact cognition. The care plan, dated 5/20/25, indicated Resident B enjoyed independent activities, walking and being outdoors. The care plan, dated 8/30/25, indicated Resident B resided on the secured unit related to dementia and exit seeking behaviors. The physician's order, dated 5/17/25, indicated staff were to monitor behaviors every shift for anxiety and depression. On 1/8/26 at 1:16 p.m., the resident was observed sitting on his bed in his room in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement, in a timely manner, a plan of care for a resident (Resident B) on the memory care unit for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/8/26 at 2:28 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disease and major depressive disorder. The room change notice, dated 7/18/25, indicated Resident B was moved to the memory care unit. The care plan, dated 8/30/25, indicated the resident resided on a secure unit due to dementia and exit seeking. The clinical record lacked documentation of a secured unit base line care plan until 8/30/25 (two weeks after the resident's room change). During an interview, on 1/9/26 at 3:28 p.m., the Director of Nursing indicated Resident B's care plan for the secured unit should have been initiated at the time of the move. On 1/9/26 at 12:27 p.m., the Administrator provided a current copy of the document titled Baseline Care Plan Assessment/Comprehensive Care Plans dated 3/23/21. It included, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident B) placed on the memory care unit had the appropriate diagnosis for placement for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dementia care. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/8/26 at 2:28 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but was not limited to, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety and bipolar disorder. The physician's order, dated 7/18/25, indicated the resident may reside on the secured unit. The care plan, dated 8/30/25, indicated the resident resided on the secured unit related to dementia and exit seeking. The interventions included activities per schedule, secured unit per physician order and to review and assess appropriate placement. The clinical record lacked documentation for a diagnosis of dementia, Alzheimer's or the clinical need for the secured unit. On 1/9/26 at 12:11 p.m., Resident B's former primary care physician at the facility, indicated the resident did not have a dementia diagnosis and he would not have initiated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary kitchen for 2 of 2 kitchen observations and failed to store foods appropriately related to snack refrigerators for 2 of 2 snack refrigerators reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 69 of 70 residents that received foods from the kitchen. Findings include: 1.During an initial tour of the kitchen and the Main Hallway Nourishment Room, on 09/10/25 between 9:35 and 9:50 A.M, with the Dietary Manager (DM) the following was observed:-The main door to the kitchen from the dining room was propped wide open, -A rolling door in front of the steam table was open, and no staff were present serving food, -The floors were scattered with crumbs, under the tables and around the walls, -A plastic spoon and a small butter packet were under the steam table with crumb buildup on floor by the wall, -A serving plate holder had buildup of an unknown substance spilled on the back side of it, and-A plastic cart that held serving lid covers was covered with a layer of crumbs on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical restraint for the purpose of convenience for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for restraints. (Resident B)Findings include:The record for Resident B was reviewed on 7/31/25 at 9:48 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, alcohol abuse with alcohol induced mood disorder, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and anxiety disorder.The care plan, dated 7/8/25 and revised on 7/28/25, indicated Resident B was at risk for falls due to and a history of falls, weakness, impaired mobility, and restlessness. The interventions included, but were not limited to, a high back wheelchair for comfort and positioning as tolerated, staff were to keep the resident's call light in reach, and staff were to keep the resident within sight of staff when he was up in his wheelchair.The incident report, dated 7/28/25, indicated Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 3 reported to oncoming staff that staff had to use a gait belt in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-17 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure snacks were provided and were available for residents for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for dietary services (Residents E, F, G, H, K and L). This deficient practice had the potential to affect 63 of 63 residents who consume food from the facility. Findings include: During an anonymous interview, from 6/16/25 to 6/17/25, Staff Member 5 indicated last week she bought coffee, doughnuts and a gallon of milk because the facility was out of snacks. It happened all the time. The nursing staff were always buying snacks because the dietary department would not provide food or drink items, half of the time; and the residents wanted snacks. During an anonymous interview, from 6/16/25 to 6/17/25, Staff Member 7 indicated it was normal for staff to purchase snacks for the residents as dietary almost never has any for them. During an interview with the Dietary Manager, on 6/16/25 at 10:15 a.m., she indicated they had been unable to get pasteurized eggs for the past four weeks due to a shortage. It was a first come,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physicians' orders related to medication hold parameters for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. (Resident B and Resident D). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/16/25 at 11:11 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertension. The physician's order, dated 3/8/25, indicated the resident was to receive atenolol 25 mg (milligrams) daily at 8:00 a.m. for hypertension. The resident's medication was to be held for SBP (systolic blood pressure) less than 120. The April 2025 medication administration record (EMAR) indicated the resident received the atenolol when their SBP was less than 120 on the following dates: - On 4/06/25, the resident's SBP was 112. - On 4/07/25, the resident's SBP was 118. - On 4/11/25, the resident's SBP was 118. - On 4/13/25, the resident's SBP was 109. - On 4/14/25, the resident's SBP was 115. - On 4/24/15, the resident's SBP was 102. - On 4/30/25, the resident's SBP was 89. The May 2025 EMAR indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was in place for the administration of an additional dose related to anxiety medication for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident E) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 6/17/25 at 1:30 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, generalized anxiety. The care plan, dated 1/14/25, indicated the resident was at risk for anxiousness and to administer medications as ordered by the physician. The physician's order, dated 2/10/25, indicated the resident was to receive Lorazepam, 0.5 mg (milligrams) by mouth daily at bedtime (8:00 p.m.). Review of the May 2025 and June 2025 controlled drug records indicated the Lorazepam was administered on the following dates and times: - On 5/05/25 at 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., the controlled drug records indicated the resident received the Lorazepam twice a day (BID). - On 5/06/25 at 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., the controlled drug records indicated the resident received the Lorazepam BID. - On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident E) received double portions, per the meal tickets, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dietary services. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 6/16/25 at 2:20 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease and malignant neoplasm of the prostate. The physician's order, dated 10/10/24, indicated the resident was to receive double portions at all meals. During an observation of the lunch meal service, on 6/17/25 at 12:15 p.m., Resident E did not receive double portions. The resident's meal ticket/card, dated 6/17/25, indicated the resident was to receive double portions, in all capital letters, at the top of the ticket. During an interview, on 6/17/25 at 12:30 p.m., the Dietary Manager indicated the dietary staff should follow the meal tickets when serving meals. On 6/17/25 at 2:00 p.m., the Clinical Support provided a current, undated copy of the document titled Accuracy of Quality of Tray Line Service. It included,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate assistive device related to a lip plate was in place, per the resident's plan of care, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for assistive devices. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/16/25 at 11:11 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia and severe intellectual disorder. The physician's order, dated 3/8/25, indicated the resident was to received an pureed consistent carbohydrate diet and to provide an inner lip plate (divided plate) at meals. The care plan, dated 4/16/23, indicated the resident was on a consistent carbohydrate pureed diet and to provide an inner lip plate for meals. During an observation, on 6/17/25 at 12:25 p.m., the resident was served his lunch meal in individual bowls. The resident's lunch meal ticket, dated 6/17/25, indicated the resident was to have an inner lip plate at meals. During an interview, on 6/17/25 at 12:30 p.m., the Dietary Manager indicated the dietary staff should have followed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to schedule 8-hour consecutive RN coverage for 6 of 6 months reviewed. (July, August, September, October, November, and December 2024). This had the potential to affect all 60 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: The review of the July through December 2024 Licensed Nursing schedule indicated the following days were short of 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage: - On July 6, 2024, there were only 6 hours of consecutive RN coverage. - On July 7, 2024, there were only 6 hours of consecutive RN coverage. - On July 20, 2024, there were only 6 hours of consecutive RN coverage. - On July 21, 2024, there were only 6 hours of consecutive RN coverage. - On August 3, 2024, there were only 6 hours of consecutive RN coverage. - On August 4, 2024, there were only 6 hours of consecutive RN coverage. - On August 17, 2024, there were only 6 hours of consecutive RN coverage. - On August 18, 2024, there were only 6 hours of consecutive RN coverage. - On August 31, 2024, there were only 6 hours of consecutive RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medication counts were properly documented at the time of administration and expired insulins were removed for 3 of 5 medication carts reviewed. ([NAME] Drive medication cart 1, [NAME] Avenue medication cart 1 and Memory Care medication cart 1). Findings include: 1. During an observation on [DATE] at 10:08 a.m., of the [NAME] Drive Medication Cart 1, the following concerns were identified in the narcotic drawer: a. The Controlled Drug Receipt Record/Disposition sheet indicated that Resident 53 had 3 tablets of the Tramadol left on the sheet. The Tramadol medication card had 2 tablets left. The record for Resident 53 was reviewed on [DATE] at 8:21 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, nondisplaced fracture of the right radius of the neck, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, gout, diverticulosis, abdominal pain, and irritable bowel syndrome. The physician's order, dated [DATE], indicated to administer 50 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to adequately secure residents in the facility van when transporting 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 66) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 66 was reviewed on 2/19/25 at 1:30 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic osteomyelitis with draining sinus to the left radius and ulna, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet, radiculopathy, lumbosacral region intervertebral disc disorders with radiculopathy, and lack of coordination. The baseline care plan completed on admission to the facility, dated 1/15/25, indicated the resident had no previous history of falls. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/21/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required extensive assistance with two staff members to complete her Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). The ADL care plan, dated 2/7/25, indicated Resident 66 had a risk for falls due to weakness, impaired mobility, lumbosacral radiculopathy, and sacroiliitis. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dialysis site monitoring and assessments were completed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 24) Findings include: The record for Resident 24 was reviewed on 2/19/25 at 10:15 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dependence on renal dialysis, end stage renal disease, and diabetes mellitus The physician's order, dated 5/13/24, indicated staff were to monitor the resident's AV (arterial vascular) fistula for signs and symptoms of infection, bleeding, bruit/thrill every shift. The order was discontinued on 12/29/24 related to the resident being sent to the hospital. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/26/24, indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. The resident required substantial or maximal staff assistance with his Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). The care plan, dated 6/20/23, indicated Resident 24 had end stage renal disease with the need for dialysis. The interventions included, but were not limited to, dialysis per dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store and dispose of discontinued insulin pens appropriately for 1 of 5 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. (Eagle Court Hall Medication Cart) Findings include: 1.a. During an observation on 2/18/25 at 10:35 a.m. of the Eagle Court Hall Medication Cart, Resident 18's Humalog kwikpen was lying freely in the drawer without a pharmacy label, but had a sticker on the kwikpen with the resident's name. The Humalog had an open date of 2/17/25. The record for Resident 18 was reviewed on 2/18/25 at 10:40 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, type 2 diabetic mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. The physician's order, dated 1/8/25, indicated staff were to administer Lispro (Humalog) subcutaneously, four times daily for diabetes, per sliding scale: if 150 to 199 mg/dL ( milligrams per deciliter) give 4 units ; 200 to 249 mg/dL give 8 units; 250 to 299 mg/dL give 12 units; 300 to 349 mg/dL give 16 units for blood sugar greater than 350 mg/dL give 20 units and notify the physician. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure snacks were provided and available for residents for 8 of 10 residents reviewed for dietary services (Residents B, N, O, H, R, P, Q, and S). This deficient practice had the potential to affect 61 of 62 residents who consume food from the faciliy. Findings include: During an interview, on 2/5/25 at 12:50 p.m., Resident B indicated she and her roommate buy their own snacks, and the kitchen never had any to provide. During an interview, on 2/5/25 at 1:05 p.m., Resident N indicated the kitchen never had any snacks to offer so she had purchased her own. During an interview, on 2/6/25 at 9:28 a.m., Resident O indicated the kitchen always was out of orange juice, grape juice, apple juice as well as milk. There were never snacks passed out at night. On 2/6/25 at 9:30 a.m., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 9 was observed passing snacks and drinks on the [NAME] Hallway. CNA 9 indicated she had purchased all the snacks on the snack cart because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident B) was informed, in a timely manner, of the cancellation of an appointment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/5/25 at 2:11 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage heart failure and anxiety. The progress note, dated 1/29/25 at 8:39 a.m., indicated the resident was upset and angry. She had an appointment with pain management and the appointment was canceled. An attempt was made to explain to the resident that once she was picked up by hospice services, hospice would take over her care and manage her pain which was why the appointment was canceled. The clinical record lacked documentation that the resident was notified of the cancellation of the appointment prior to the day of the appointment on 1/29/25. During an interview on 2/5/25 at 12:50 p.m., the resident indicated she had an appointment with pain management on 1/29/25. It was canceled sometime in January by Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal abuse by a staff member for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident D and Resident L) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 2/6/25 at 11:22 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic disorder with delusions and major depressive disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/1/24, indicated Resident D was alert and oriented. The incident report, dated 1/16/25, indicated Resident D reported concerns with her care provided by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 14. The follow up report, dated 1/23/25, indicated after an investigation was completed related to concerns with care, the facility was unable to substantiate any allegations of abuse. During an interview on 2/5/25 at 1:25 p.m., Resident D indicated LPN 14 was always argumentative. She had a snotty attitude; the LPN's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with 1150B of the Act for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for reporting abuse allegations. (Resident D and Resident L) Findings include: The incident report, dated 1/16/25, indicated Resident D reported concerns with her care provided by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 14. The follow up report, dated 1/23/25, indicated after an investigation was completed, the facility was unable to substantiate any allegations of abuse. 1. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 2/6/25 at 11:22 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic disorder with delusions and major depressive disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/1/24, indicated Resident D was alert and oriented. During a telephone interview on 2/7/25 at 2:30 p.m., RN 15 indicated on 1/14/25, after she clocked in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a plan of care for a resident (Resident B) after all the resident's teeth were extracted for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plans. Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/5/25 at 2:11 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage heart failure and anxiety. On 2/5/25 at 12:50 p.m., the resident was observed without teeth. The resident indicated she was going to be fitted for dentures since she had all of her teeth pulled on 1/10/25. The progress note, dated 1/10/25 at 2:47 p.m., indicated the residents' mouth was packed with gauze. The resident had some bleeding at that time. The physician's order, dated 1/31/25, indicated the resident may have per resident preference: Chicken noodle soup, ice cream, or pudding, related to having all her teeth pulled on 1/10/25. The clinical record lacked documentation of the implementation a plan of care related to the extraction of all the resident's teeth. During an interview, on 2/6/25 at 10:15 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident B) diet was changed and implemented in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dietary. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/5/25 at 2:11 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but was not limited to, hypertension and end stage heart disease. During an interview, on 2/5/25 at 12:50 p.m., Resident B indicated on 1/10/25, she had all of her teeth extracted so she could be fitted for dentures. The progress note, dated 1/10/25 at 2:47 p.m., indicated the resident's mouth was packed with gauze there was some bleeding observed. The physician's order, dated 1/14/25, indicated the resident was to have chicken noodle soup, ice cream, pudding and milk for meals due to having all her teeth pulled on 1/10/25. The clinical record lacked documentation of a change in the resident's ability to eat on 1/10/25 until 1/14/25. During an interview, on 2/6/25 at 10:15 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated to her knowledge, the resident did not come back with any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record reviewed, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident H) therapeutic diet was followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident meals. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident H was reviewed on 2/7/25 at 11:44 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, anxiety and major depressive disorder. The physician's order, dated 3/12/24, indicated the resident was to receive prune juice with her lunch every day. During an interview on 2/6/25 at 1:40 p.m., Resident H indicated she had an order from the doctor to have prune juice every day with her lunch. She had never received the prune juice with her lunch tray. During an interview on 2/6/25 at 2:38 p.m., the Regional Director of the dietary service indicated she would have to go out a purchase some prune juice since the facility currently had no prune juice available. The partial contract for dietary management contract was provided by the Regional Director of Operations on 2/27/25 at 5:48 p.m. It included, but was not limited to, Dining Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dressing changes on residents' (Resident B and Resident D) peripherally inserted central catheter line were completed as ordered for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 11/2/24 at 5:56 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, acute osteomyelitis of the right foot and ankle. The physician's order, dated 10/5/24, indicated to change the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line dressing weekly and as needed. The care plan, dated 10/24/24, indicated the resident had a PICC line to the right upper extremity and to change the dressing per order. During an observation on 11/1/24 at 1:12 p.m., Resident B's PICC line dressing to the right upper extremity was dated 10/24/24. During an observation on 11/2/24 at 4:53 p.m., Resident B's PICC line dressing to the right upper extremity was dated 10/24/24. The November 2024 medication administration record indicated the treatment was completed on 11/1/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident E) routine Lorazepam (narcotic antianxiety medication) was administered, as ordered by the physician, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 11/4/24 at 9:45 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but was not limited to, anxiety and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. During an interview on 11/2/24 at 6:24 p.m., Resident E indicated her anxiety medications were frequently late and sometimes she did not get it at all. The care plan, dated 5/17/24, indicated the resident was at increased risk for anxiousness due to anxiety and to administer the anxiety medication as ordered. The physicians's order, dated 7/26/24, indicated the resident was to receive Lorazepam 1 mg (milligram) routinely at 12:00 a.m., 4:00 a.m., 8:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. The October 2024 medication administration record indicated the resident received the Lorazepam 1 mg on the following dates and times: -10/04/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at appropriate temperatures for 1 of 1 observations of food temperatures. ([NAME] Hall) Findings include: On 11/1/24 at 12:00 p.m., upon entrance to the dining room, a meal time sign was observed to be posted which included the following meal times for [NAME] Hall: Lunch - 12:15 p.m. Dinner - 5:20 p.m. Review of the September 2024 resident council minutes, dated 9/19/24 at 2:00 p.m., indicated the residents had concerns of breakfast food being served cold and dinner being served late. Review of the October 2024 resident council minutes, dated 10/24/24 at 2:00 p.m., indicated the residents had concerns of the breakfast food being served cold and dinner was late. On 11/1/24 at 12:58 p.m., the lunch trays were brought to the [NAME] Hall at 12:58 p.m. On 11/1/24 at 1:08 p.m., with the Dietary Manager, the following food temperatures were observed: -Cheesy grits with shrimp - 145 degrees -Collard greens - 126 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as resident's (Resident E) medication administration record accurately reflected the administration of as needed narcotic pain medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medical records. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 11/4/24 at 9:45 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage heart failure, anxiety and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The physician's order, dated 8/2/24, indicated the resident was to receive Morphine Sulfate (narcotic pain medication), 0.75 mg (milligrams) every 2 hours as needed for pain. The October 2024 controlled drug record indicated the resident received the medication on the following dates and times: -10/3/24 at 12:02 a.m., 5:30 a.m., 7:30 a.m., 9:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m., 1:30 p.m., 3:30 p.m., 5:30 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. -10/4/24 at 5:00 a.m., 7:45 p.m., and 9:45 a.m. -10/5/24 at 4:00 a.m., 6:00 a.m., 8:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. -10/6/24 at 12:00 a.m., 2:00 a.m., 4:00 a.m., 6:00 a.m. and 8:15 p.m. -10/8/24 at 8:30 a.m., 10:35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to act upon resident concerns of food temperatures, taste of food, no activities on the weekend, drinks not being passed at night, staff completed the menus instead of asking the residents for 5 of 13 months of Resident Council meetings (May, July, September, November 2023; and January 2024). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 67 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. The Resident Council Meetings, dated 5/23/23, indicated the residents' concerns were not acted upon or resolved related to Cold food, quality of the food, cheese not melted on burgers, kitchen not following the menus, not getting snacks after 6:00 p.m., not getting milk when requested on ticket, not getting correct eggs being put on tray, more snack choices for the nutrition room, orange juice watered down, and not getting Ensure. The response dated 5/26/23, from the Activity Director, indicated she responded that as of right now, there was an activity aide on Sundays from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure individualized resident activities were conducted for residents with dementia related to aggressive behaviors, resident to resident altercation, accidents, and inappropriate sexual behaviors for 6 of 19 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Residents C, E, F, G, B, and H) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident C was reviewed on 1/31/23 at 2:21 p.m. The diagnoses included but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with other behavioral disturbances, senile degeneration of the brain, alcohol abuse, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, insomnia, and delusional disorder. The Quarterly MDS (Minimal Data Set) assessment, dated 12/20/23, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and was never or rarely understood and did not exhibit any behaviors. The care plan, dated 1/30/23, indicated the resident was at risk for behavioral disturbances related to dementia with behavioral disturbances. He was hard of hearing, had agitation, verbal and physical aggression, toileted in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate psychosocial follow-up by social services, related to aggressive behaviors, resident to resident altercations, accidents, and inappropriate sexual behaviors for 4 of 19 residents reviewed for social services. (Residents 61, C, E, and F) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 1/30/24 at 10:25 a.m., Resident 61 indicated she had depression and complicated life circumstances. The facility was aware of it. She had no one to talk to. The record for Resident 61 was reviewed on 1/31/24 at 8:21 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with ascites, depression, alcohol abuse, and suicidal ideations. The PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Level 2 outcome, dated 7/27/23, indicated the resident had been hospitalized on [DATE] because she said she wanted to hurt herself. She had a personal history that was significant for alcohol dependence which had resulted in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate staffing to maintain the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 67 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: During tours of the kitchen on 1/29/24 at 9:14 a.m., 1/29/24 at 10:16 a.m., 1/31/24 at 1:16 p.m., and 2/1/24 at 10:03 a.m., multiple concerns were observed with the kitchen cleanliness. The kitchen was observed to pans with food debris in them used for multiple meal service times, dirty equipment, utensils, floors, and appliances throughout multiple observations and during non-meal service times throughout the survey. Cross Reference: F812 During an interview on 1/29/24 at 9:30 a.m., Dietary [NAME] 3 indicated they didn't have a dietary manager. They had several staff members quit and it was down to just her and two other staff members for a while. During an interview on 1/30/24 at 1:16 p.m., Dietary [NAME] 5 indicated they didn't have a manager right now and only had three core staff working for a while. Himself, Dietary [NAME] 3 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed menus and recipes for meal services for 3 of 3 random observations of meal service. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 65 of the 67 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/29/24 at 11:35 a.m., Dietary [NAME] 3 poured potato flakes into a pot of boiling water. She did not measure anything and kept adding potatoes until it was thickened. She then temped the foods on the tray service line. She indicated she did not have peppers and onions to temp. They were in the steak. The steak had very few, small green specks which the cook indicated were peppers. Onions could not be distinguished from the rest of the patty if they were present. At 12:05 p.m., a resident came to the kitchen window and asked what was for lunch. Dietary [NAME] 3 told him it was Salisbury steaks and mashed potatoes and that was all they were having. She didn't have a vegetable prepared. The cook began serving. The plates were served with 1 beef patty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered a nourishing snack at night between dinner and breakfast for 6 of 21 residents related to snacks. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 65 of the 67 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: The review of the 9/21/23 Resident Council meeting, the following concern was identified: - Residents said they were being told by night shift there were no snacks available for them in the nutrition room. They were also requesting oranges and bananas to be available in the nutrition room. On 9/21/23, the Dietary Manager indicated she was stocking the nutrition room daily with bread, peanut butter, jelly, bologna, cheese, applesauce, pudding, and cottage cheese. There were crackers, jello and oatmeal also available. Oranges and bananas would be ordered. During the Resident Council meeting on 1/31/24 at 1:00 p.m. with 9 residents whom the Activities Director indicated were alert and oriented, Residents 9, 5, 54, 32, 50,and 19 indicated the snacks and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure cleanliness of the kitchen and appropriate food preparation related to the steam table, handwashing sink, storage containers, preparation counter, storage cabinet, food processor, and kitchen appliances for 3 of 3 random observations of the kitchen. Findings include: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 1/29/24 at 9:14 a.m., the following concerns were observed: -The handwashing sink had no paper towels or trashcan within reach. - The steam table had brown grime streaking down the front and staining the bottom rack of the table's stainless steel. - Storage containers underneath a preparation counter with packets of ketchup, creamer, salt, and pepper were dirty with food particles and grime. - The cabinet above the preparation counter storing plates and bowls had food particles and crumbs littering the cabinet. - The second preparation counter had food grime caked in the corners and streaking down the front. -The outside of the food processor was coated in food particles and grime. -There were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident preferences with meals were honored for 2 of 25 residents reviewed for choices. (Resident B and 275) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/1/24 at 1:00 p.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dysphasia. The care plan, dated 8/22/22, indicated the resident had allergies to tomato and tomato products. The interventions included, but were not limited to, do not provide allergen. The nutritional assessment, dated 7/7/22, indicated the resident's food allergies included tomatoes. The resident's meal tray card indicated her allergies included tomatoes and tomato products. During an observation on 2/1/24 at 12:31 p.m., Resident B's tray was uncovered. She was served the main dish, including the beef mostaccioli which had tomato based sauce. The review of her tray card indicated she was allergic to tomatoes and she had selected to have a hamburger for lunch. During an interview on 2/1/24 at 12:32 p.m., CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 8 indicated she would need an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan from being at-risk for skin issues to actual skin impairment when the resident developed a rash and wound to the right ankle and leg for 1 of 19 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Resident 13) Findings include: The record for Resident 13 was reviewed on 1/29/24 at 1:19 p.m., The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease with dialysis, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and vascular dementia. moderate, without behavioral, psychotic, or mood disturbance, and anxiety. The Interim Payment Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/20/23, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, occasionally felt down/depressed, had no behavior issues, required partial to moderate assistance for bed mobility, was dependent for transfers, was non-ambulatory, and had impairment in functional range of motion on one side of his lower extremity. A Skin/Wound note, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate emergency supplies for tracheostomy care were at the bedside for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for tracheostomy care. (Resident 25) Findings include: During an observation on 1/30/24 at 8:57 a.m., Resident 25 was resting in bed. She had a tracheostomy and was breathing room air. There was no ambu bag (mechanical resuscitation device) or emergency oxygen supply at the bedside or in the room. During an interview on 1/30/24 at 8:59 a.m., LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 6 indicated there was not an ambu bag in the resident's room. The closest ambu bag she had access to was at her crash cart. The nurse searched the room and verified there was no ambu bag in the room. To her knowledge they did not keep them in the room for their tracheostomy patients. During an observation on 1/30/24 at 9:02 a.m., LPN 6 walked to the crash cart which was approximately fifteen to twenty feet down hall at the nurse's station. She removed the seal from the crash cart but could not get it open. She tried multiple times to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate behavioral health services were obtained for 1 of 12 residents reviewed for behavioral health services. (Resident 61) Findings include: During an interview on 1/30/24 at 10:25 a.m., Resident 61 indicated she had depression and complicated life circumstances. The facility was well aware of it. Someone came and saw her a month or so ago and was supposed to come back every Thursday, but they hadn't come back yet, and it was over a month ago. She believed she would benefit from therapy. She had no one to talk to. The record for Resident 61 was reviewed on 1/31/24 at 8:21 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with ascites, depression, alcohol abuse, and suicidal ideations. The PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Level 2 outcome, dated 7/27/23, indicated the resident had been hospitalized on [DATE] because she said she wanted to hurt herself. She had personal history that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent falls, wandering and inappropriate behaviors for 5 of 19 residents observed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 19 residents residing on the dementia unit. (Residents G, B, C, E, and F) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident G was reviewed on 1/30/24 at 2:45 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, altered mental status, mild cognitive impairment, aphasia, cognitive communication deficit, polyneuropathy, dementia, lack of coordination, weakness, difficulty walking, disorientation, major depression, affective mood disorder, bipolar disorder, and peripheral vascular disease. The Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/3/23, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) note, dated 3/22/23 at 7:18 a.m., indicated the resident's notes were reviewed, and on 3/21/23 the resident was exit-seeking, pacing, and becoming aggressive with staff when redirecting. The behavior note, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain routine dental services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dental services. (Resident 39) Findings include: During an observation on 1/29/24 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 39 had broken and discolored teeth. Some of the edges of her teeth were jagged. The record for Resident 39 was reviewed on 1/31/24 at 11:14 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, aphasia, dementia, and dysphagia. The Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 11/24/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The physician's order, dated 12/11/23, indicated the resident may be seen by the dentist. During an observation on 2/1/24 at 2:42 p.m., Resident 39 was in bed. Her teeth were stained brown and observed with multiple fractures, darkened areas, and jagged, sharp looking broken edges. During an interview on 2/1/24 at 2:44 p.m., LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 13 indicated the resident's teeth were not the greatest. She didn't think the resident had seen a dentist since she'd been working there. She did have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify an unresolved quality deficiency which had been cited on a previous survey, and ensure actions were developed and implemented to attempt to correct the deficiency through the quality assessment and assurance (QAA) process, as evidenced by a repeated deficiency for elopements. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 10 of 10 residents residing in the facility who are at a risk for elopement. Finding includes: The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was a general outline of how to set up a QAPI committee and what the committee should do. The QAPI plan was a data driven, proactive approach for improving the quality of life, care and services in long term care. The activities of QAPI involved members at all levels of the organization to identify opportunities for improvement, address gaps in systems or processes, develop and implement and improvement or corrective plan and continuous monitoring of interventions. The following deficiency was cited on this survey at Immediate Jeopardy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a staff member did not post photos of a resident on their personal social media account for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 12/8/23 at 9:56 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and cognitive communication deficit. The quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Review of Resident B's guardianship paperwork indicated the guardian was appointed for the resident on 7/24/15. On 12/8//23 at 10:00 a.m., seven pictures of Resident B were observed on the Dietary Manager's personal social media page with a posted date of 10/26/23. The pictures were of the resident inside the facility, throughout her time at the facility. The resident's clinical record lacked documentation of consent from Resident B's guardian to post picture on social media. During an interview on 12/8/23 at 10:25 a.m., the Executive Director (ED) indicated per the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident C) fall intervention was in place, per the resident's plan of care, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 12/8/23 at 12:06 p.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, history of falls. The care plan, dated 4/13/21, indicated the resident was at risk for falls. The interventions included, but were not limited to, non-skid strips to the bathroom floor. During an observation on 12/8/23 at 2:01 p.m., Resident C's bathroom floor did not have non-skid strips in place. During an interview on 12/8/23 at 2:04 p.m., the Director of Nursing indicated they would ensure non-skid strips were placed to the bathroom floor. During an interview on 12/11/23 at 10:05 a.m., the Executive Director indicated the non-skid strips were put down on Friday. She believed that the old strips were scraped up by housekeeping and the maintenance department was not informed to replace them. This Citation relates to Complaint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility management failed to report incidents to the Indiana Department of Health when a resident (Resident F ) exited the facility grounds, without supervision, and when a staff member reported an allegation of abuse (Resident C) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for reportable incidents. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 9/25/23 at 3:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbance and cognitive communication deficit. The annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/13/23, indicated the resident's cognition was moderate impaired. The progress note, dated 9/4/23 at 1:20 p.m., indicated Staff Member 2 informed Staff Member 3 that Resident F was seen walking south on the highway towards a liquor store. The police were notified of a resident that had eloped from the facility. Staff Member 2 left the facility to find the resident. The resident was cooperative and brought back to the facility by the police. The resident was assessed and offered fluids. A wander…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was in place when a resident (Resident F), with impaired cognition, did not exit the facility grounds and ambulated down the highway six tenths of a mile, without supervision, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents/supervision. Findings include: On 9/25/23 at 2:36 p.m., Resident F was observed in the dining room participating in an activity. He had a wander guard to his right wrist. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 9/25/23 at 3:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbance and cognitive communication deficit. The annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/13/23, indicated the resident's cognition was moderate impaired. The care plan, dated 10/18/23, indicated the Care plan date was 10/18/22, Resident F's history included, but was not limited to, impaired cognition, poor insight and lack of awareness. The elopement assessment, dated 7/26/23, indicated the resident was not at risk for elopement. The progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-04-13 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure Saturday's mail was delivered to the residents upon arrival to the post box. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 63 of 63 residents currently residing in the facility.Findings include:During the Resident Council meeting, on 4/10/26 at 10:00 a.m., with 6 residents who were alert and oriented per the Assistant Activity Director, the residents indicated they were not getting their Saturday mail as no Activity Staff was there on the weekends. They were the ones who usually passed it out. The residents indicated they had seen the mail be delivered to the outside mail box but no one went and got it. During an interview with the Activities Director, on 4/13/26 at 12:45 p.m., she indicated there was no one assigned to pass the mail on Saturdays. Human Resources would retrieve it first thing Monday morning from the mail box, sort through the bills and other important mail she needed to address and then bring the rest of the residents' mail to her to pass out. 410 IAC (Indiana Administrative Code) 16.2-3.1-3(s)(1)
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$45,372 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $14,020 — penalty dated 2026-03-18
- $31,352 — penalty dated 2023-12-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 68 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 68; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PUTNAM COUNTY HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2020 |
| BRAY, ARNOLD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2012 |
| FRY, JANICE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2012 |
| HEADLEY, MATTHEW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2012 |
| LANDRY, KEITH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| LEWIS, KATRINA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 12/21/2022 |
| UNDERWOOD, WENDELL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2024 |
| WEATHERFORD, DENNIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/18/2012 |
| WOOD, MARK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 08/05/2024 |
| SILLERY, DEBRA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/03/2026 |
| WATERS OF SCOTTSBURG II | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2020 |
| HEWITT, MELINDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/27/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $872K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155494. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.