Waters Of Martinsville, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 51.6 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent repeated falls for a resident assessed to be a high risk for falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice resulted in a resident sustaining fractures of the wrist and hand and hospitalization for decreased mobility in lower extremities. (Resident B) B. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an assessed behavior of wandering and a high risk of elopement was provided treatment and services to prevent an elopement which resulted in the resident going through an unlocked door and getting outside without staff knowledge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement. (Resident C) Findings include: A1. On 4/15/25 at 11:24 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, osteoporosis (a condition where bones become weak and brittle), osteoarthritis (occurs when flexible tissue at the ends of bones wears down), and history of a healed traumatic fracture. A hospital…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development and worsening of facility acquired pressure ulcers for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice resulted in worsening and possible infection of an unstageable pressure ulcer and the development of a Stage III pressure ulcer. (Resident 34, Resident 5) Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 2:06 p.m., Resident 34's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, overactive bladder, and diabetes mellitus. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer, dated [DATE] at 7:52 a.m., indicated the resident was a mild risk for developing a pressure ulcer. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated she had severe cognitive impairment; was always incontinent of urine; frequently incontinent of bowel movements; was at risk for skin breakdown; did not currently have any pressure ulcers; had no impairments for mobility with the left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a safe and sanitary manner for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. Hairnets were not worn while preparing food, the dishwashing room was dirty, and expired foods were not discarded. Findings include:1. During a tour of the kitchen on 1/29/26 from 7:40 a.m. until 8:05 a.m., the following was observed.- The Activity Director and the Social Service Director were working in the kitchen, preparing meal trays, without wearing a hair net. At that time, the Social Service Director indicated they should have put on hair nets before working in the kitchen. - Inside the walk-in refrigerator observed a plastic one-gallon jug of [NAME] Chere Old Fashion Ranch Dressing with an open date of 12/29/25, and an expiration of on 12/12/25 (The dressing was opened after the expiration date). At that time, the Dietary Manager indicated the expired ranch dressing should have been removed from the refrigerator.- A buildup of debris and food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and safe environment for 2 of 2 random observations. Linens were not clean, soiled briefs were left in garbage cans, and odors were present. (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER])1. On 1/29/26 at 8:25 a.m., inside room [ROOM NUMBER] observed a large orange/brown stain on the fitted sheet on Bed B (window bed) and one urine soiled brief in the garbage can inside the bathroom. The bathroom had a strong urine odor. The bathroom was shared between room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]. At that time, Resident B indicated she couldn't remember when her sheets had been changed last and when she changed her own briefs, she threw her used soiled briefs in the garbage can in the bathroom.During an interview on 1/29/26 at 8:42 a.m., Resident C indicated her room had a shared bathroom with Resident B's room. Resident C had taken herself to the bathroom because she liked doing things for herself and had placed her own soiled briefs in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a sanitary manner for 1 of 3 kitchen observations. Hair was not covered, food was not labeled or discarded by manufacturer's use by date, floors and other surfaces required cleaning, and a scoop was kept in dry storage goods. These had the potential to affect 52 of 53 residents residing in the facility. (Dietary Aide 2)Findings include:During an observation of the kitchen on 10/22/25 from 12:20 p.m. to 12:50 p.m., the following was observed.-Dietary Aide 2 was observed in and around the food preparation areas. Dietary Aide 2 was observed to lack hair coverage to hair out the back and side of hair net, hanging down back and on the shoulders approximately six to eight inches in length past the hair net. -In a two-door refrigerator on the left-hand side, one full half gallon of 100 percent lactose free two percent milk with a best by date of 10/17/25. -In the walk-in refrigerator unit, on the middle left side shelf, one partially uncovered metal tray of red gelatin looking substance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of and participated in their treatment plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for mood and behavior. (Resident 36)Finding includes:On 9/25/25 at 2:19 p.m., Resident 36's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety disorder, depression, bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), and dementia.A review of the resident's physician orders indicated from 7/31/25 to 8/12/25 the resident was prescribed Risperdal (antipsychotic medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) twice daily for bipolar episodes. On 8/13/25, an order indicated the Risperdal was increased to 1 milligram (mg) twice daily.The clinical record lacked an informed consent for the increase of the antipsychotic medication on 8/13/25.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/26/25 at 11:34 a.m., she indicated there was no documentation that an informed consent was provided prior to the resident receiving the increased…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from physical and verbal abuse by another resident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 4, Resident 18)Findings include:On 9/24/25 at 10:12 a.m., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder.An 9/16/25 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact.During an interview on 9/29/25 at 11:16 a.m., CNA 3 indicated Resident 4 was often aggressive with staff and other residents. She was aware of Resident 4 hitting Resident 18 on the head. During an interview on 9/29/25 at 11:20 a.m., LPN 2 indicated Resident 4 had an aggressive affect and she was aware of Resident 4 hitting Resident 18 on the head. During an interview on 9/29/25 at 12:10 p.m., the Administrator (ADM) indicated Resident 4 struck Resident 18 in the face after an altercation. Resident 18 shouted at another resident to stop screaming and Resident 4 went across the hallway and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the written notification required for a transfer/discharge was provided to the resident and the resident representative for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. (Resident 8, Resident 66) Findings include: 1. On 9/25/25 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and delusional disorder (a mental health condition characterized by persistent, false beliefs (delusions) that are not based on reality). A review of the resident's progress notes indicated the resident was transferred to the emergency room on 7/27/25 and returned to the long-term care facility on 7/30/25. . The clinical record lacked documentation that a written notice was provided to the resident and resident representative. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/26/25 at 2:19…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment for 2 of 15 residents reviewed for MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment accuracy. Antidepressants, Level II assessments, and hospice services were coded incorrectly. (Resident 39, Resident 3)Findings include: 1. On 9/25/25 at 1:42 p.m., Resident 39's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety disorder, insomnia (persistent problems falling and staying asleep), and depression. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/8/25, did not indicate the resident was on an antidepressant medication and indicated the resident had not received a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II. A review of Resident 39's medication orders indicated, the resident was taking Escitalopram (a medication used to treat depression) 20 milligrams (mg) daily. The medication was prescribed on 8/28/25 for a diagnosis of depression, and the resident had continued to take this medication. A review of the resident's documents indicated a notice of PASRR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was completed when a new mental health diagnosis was added for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 6)Finding includes:On 9/29/25 at 11:33 a.m., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, depression, and anxiety.The PASARR Level I, dated 2/10/25, indicated no Level II was required due to no severe mental illness. The Level 1 indicated no mental health diagnosis was known or suspected. If new changes occur or new information refuted these findings, a new screen must be submitted.Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of depression and anxiety.The clinical record lacked a new Level I screen with the diagnoses of depression and anxiety.During an interview on 9/29/25 at 11:24 a.m., the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse indicated a new Level I would be done when a new diagnosis or a new psychotropic medication was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary intervention to promote healing of a facility acquired pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer. (Resident 53)Finding includes:On 9/23/25 at 12:27 p.m., Resident 53 was observed to be eating lunch in the dining room. She was observed to be wearing a yellow sock on her left foot with her left foot resting on the floor. No pressure relieving devices were observed to be on her feet or beside her wheelchair. On 9/23/25 at 2:29 p.m., Resident 53 was observed to be sitting in the hallway. She was observed to be wearing a yellow sock on her left foot with her left foot resting on the floor. No pressure relieving devices were observed to be on her feet or beside her wheelchair.On 9/24/25 at 9:43 a.m., Resident 53 was observed to be sitting in her wheelchair in the dining room. She was observed to be wearing a yellow sock on her left foot with her foot resting on the floor. No pressure relieving devices were observed to be on her feet or beside her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. (Resident 9)Findings include: On 9/26/25 at 11:31 a.m., Resident 9 was observed in the activity room with his urinary catheter bag inside of a concealed bag, which was touching the ground, below his reclining wheelchair.On 9/26/25 at 2:40 p.m., Resident 9 was observed in the activity room with his urinary catheter bag inside of a concealed bag, which was touching the ground, below his reclining wheelchair.On 9/24/25 at 10:39 a.m., Resident 9's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, dementia, obstructive and reflexive uropathy (a condition where urine flow is blocked in the urinary tract, leading to a buildup of urine and potential damage to the kidneys). A care plan, initiated 3/17/23, indicated the resident had a supra…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,165 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $22,165 — penalty dated 2025-04-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN