Waters Of Tipton Skilled Nursing Facility, The
300 Fairgrounds Rd, Tipton, IN 46072 · For profit - Individual · 150 certified beds · (765) 675-8791 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 6 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $20,494 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.2% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.4% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 27.0% | 25.2% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 8.1% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.4% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 32.1% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.7% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.2% | 13.6% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.2% | 79.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.5% | 22.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.5% | 10.8% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.23 | 1.61 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.16 | 1.44 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 119 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 16.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.2%CMS range 41.4–62.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.6–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 16.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 20.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 11.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 12.2%CMS range 7.2–18.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.24 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 92.9 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred according to her plan of care, was free from an injury of unknown origin, and the investigation into the injury contained complete documentation for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in Resident B receiving a mildly impacted and displaced fracture of the proximal right humerus (the ball-shaped upper portion of the arm bone which forms the shoulder joint).Findings include:During a telephone interview, on 6/29/26 at 9:48 a.m., an anonymous interviewee indicated Resident B was injured in the shower. The facility indicated she fell out of bed. Resident B did not fall out of bed.During an observation, on 6/29/26 at 10:05 a.m., Resident B's right arm was noted to be in a sling. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/29/26 at 10:58 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and weakness.A care plan, dated 12/9/25, indicated Resident B had impaired cognition/function or impaired thought process related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident remained safe from accident hazards during incontinence care provided by a staff member for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 63 hitting her head and receiving a head laceration which required six (6) staples.Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 63 was reviewed on 3/23/26 at 8:52 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and muscle wasting and atrophy.A care plan, dated 11/18/25, indicated the resident required assistance with activities of daily living. Interventions included, but were not limited to, ensure proper positioning while in bed.A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/28/26, indicated Resident 63 required substantial to maximal assistance to roll from back to side and to return to the back while in bed.A progress note, dated 2/13/26 at 1:10 p.m., indicated a CNA was completing care on Resident 63, rolled the resident toward the wall, bumped the resident's head on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-03-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's nutritional status was assessed, risk factors were identified and addressed, interventions were implemented, and the physician was notified of the need to assess a significant weight loss for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 7) This deficient practice resulted in Resident 7 experiencing an approximate 22% weight loss in approximately 4 months. Findings include:During an observation, on 3/19/26 at 12:26 p.m., Resident 7 was not eating her lunch. The CNA charting indicated the resident refused her lunch. No replacement meal or alternatives offered were charted for her lunch, on 3/19/26.During an observation, on 3/20/26 at 12:37 p.m., Resident 7 ate less than half her lunch.The clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 3/24/26 at 9:45 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy of the right and left arms, and cognitive communication deficit.A hospital discharge document, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was severely cognitively impaired and had memory problems, had assistive devices in place to prevent a fall from her moving wheelchair for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in Resident B falling forward from her wheelchair and sustaining a subarachnoid hemorrhage with facial, neck, and shoulder bruising which required hospitalization. Finding includes: A document, titled Indiana State Department of Health Survey Report System, indicated Resident B went to the emergency room (ER), on 4/13/24, upon family request after a fall, while being transferred back to her room in her wheelchair. She was sent back to the facility without any injuries. Then on 4/14/24, she had a change in mental status from her baseline, was sent back to the ER, and was admitted to the hospital for an acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. The root cause of the fall was determined to be staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an unlicensed staff notified a licensed staff member that a dependent resident experienced a fall before transferring the resident from the floor to a wheelchair. This deficient practice resulted in the resident not being immediately assessed for injury by a licensed nurse and the resident experienced bilateral femur fractures. (Resident 2) Finding includes: A document, titled Indiana State Department of Health Survey Report System, dated 12/30/23 at 5:01 a.m., indicated Resident 2 had a witnessed fall on 12/22/23. At the time of the fall, the resident's skin and pain was assessed with no concerns. The physician and family were notified of the fall. The resident was noted to have increased pain on 12/29/23 and the physician was notified. X-rays were ordered on 12/29/23. The family and physician were aware of the femur fracture and resident was sent to the emergency department for evaluation. The record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 1/8/24 at 2:55 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and staff assistance to prevent falls was provided to a resident who required the use of a mechanical lift and the assistance of two staff during transfers. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 experiencing an unwitnessed fall and bilateral femur fractures. (Resident 2) Finding includes: A document, titled Indiana State Department of Health Survey Report System, dated 12/30/23 at 5:01 a.m., indicated Resident 2 had a witnessed fall on 12/22/23. At the time of the fall, the resident's skin and pain was assessed with no concerns. The physician and family were notified of the fall. The resident was noted to have increased pain on 12/29/23 and the physician was notified. X-rays were ordered on 12/29/23. The family and physician were aware of the femur fracture and resident was sent to the emergency department for evaluation. The record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 1/8/24 at 2:55 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were completed and documented after an unwitnessed fall for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident B)Findings include:During a telephone interview, on 6/29/26 at 9:48 a.m., an anonymous interviewee indicated neurological checks and fall follow-up monitoring were not completed for Resident B.During an observation and interview, on 6/29/26 at 10:05 a.m., Resident B's right arm was noted to be in a sling. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/29/26 at 10:58 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, heart failure and weakness.A nursing progress note, dated 6/10/26 at 5:45 p.m., indicated Resident B complained of right upper extremity/shoulder pain. The physician and family were notified and an x-ray was ordered.A nursing progress note, dated 6/11/26 at 9:54 a.m., indicated Resident B had reported to the nurse she had fallen out of bed and had complaints of pain/discomfort to the right arm. The x-ray revealed an impacted and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of a resident's medical record was maintained for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident C)Findings include:During an interview, on 5/26/26 at 10:25 a.m., Resident B's representative indicated he had received the medical records of Resident C, including a summary of episode, with his father's medical record. He was concerned the facility had included another resident's private information with his father's documents. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 5/26/26 at 1:10 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic systolic congestive heart failure, dementia, and depression.A summary of episode notes, dated 5/1/26, indicated it was created by medical records on 5/1/26 at 3:19 p.m. It included, but was not limited to, the resident's date of birth , medical diagnoses, medications, and current care plan. During an interview, on 5/27/26 at 11:40 a.m., the Medical Records Director indicated requests for medical records must be made in writing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were administered the correct medications for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for significant medication errors. (Resident B and C) The deficient practice was corrected on 5/11/26, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.Findings include:During an interview, on 5/14/26 at 8:11 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated two medication errors occurred recently. Resident B had been administered Resident D's medications and Resident C had been administered Resident E's medications. Resident B was observed overnight in the emergency room, and Resident C was monitored at the facility. 1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 5/14/26 at 10:15 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, a history of falling, anxiety disorder, dementia, unsteadiness on feet, and pulmonary fibrosis. A facility document, titled Medication Error, dated 5/8/26 at 7:04 p.m., indicated Resident B had been administered medications which were not prescribed to her. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure puree foods were prepared with methods to conserve nutritive value and flavor and to maintain proper food holding temperatures to ensure safe and appetizing temperatures. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 93 of 93 residents who received food from the facility.Findings include:1. During an observation, on 3/20/26 at 9:54 a.m., [NAME] 2 was pureeing beef pot roast and carrots for seven residents who required a puree diet. [NAME] 2 placed two large scoops of the beef pot roast and an unmeasured amount of hot water into the food processor bowl and turned it on. [NAME] 2 turned the food processor off to check the consistency of the pureed food and determined the beef pot roast was still too thick. [NAME] 2 again added an unmeasured amount of hot water into the food processor and turned it back on to continue to puree the meat. When [NAME] 2 believed the pureed beef pot roast was at an appropriate texture, the food was removed from the food processor bowl and a small scoop of juices from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR) were resubmitted after psychotropic medications were initiated for newly identified behaviors, prior to the expiration for short term approvals, and for an increase in dosage of psychotropic medications for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 47, 3, 1 and 10)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 47 was reviewed on [DATE] at 1:46 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and anxiety. A hospital document, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 47's wife reported being unable to care for him at home due to his severe dementia. Resident 47 did experience hallucinations but was never violent. Resident 47's hospital discharge medication list did not include a diagnosis of anxiety or medications for anxiety or agitation. A level I PASSAR screen, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 47's only mental health diagnosis was dementia. Resident 47…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were free from expired medications and medications were properly labeled with a pharmacy label for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling. (orchard cart and garden cart)Findings include:1. The orchard hall medication cart was reviewed on 3/25/26 at 1:34 p.m. The following were observed:a. In the fifth large drawer, a prescription bottle of levothyroxine (a medication used to treat an underactive thyroid) 200 milligrams (mg) contained several small round pills. The medication bottle had a discard after date of 1/4/25. Expired was written in pink ink on the pharmacy label.During an interview, on 3/25/26 at 1:49 p.m., LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 5 indicated she believed expired medications should be taken out of the medication cart.2. The garden hall medication cart was reviewed on 3/25/26 at 1:59 p.m. The following were observed:a. In the first large drawer, a Humalog insulin pen (a rapid acting inulin used to control blood sugar) did not contain a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for resident records. (Resident 98, 7, 26 and 91)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 98 was reviewed on 3/23/26 at 8:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure, heart failure, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) pneumonia. A hospital document, dated 12/27/25, indicated Resident 98 was discharged from the hospital to the facility with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, pneumonia of the left lower lobe and acute hypoxic respiratory failure. During Resident 98's hospital treatment course, the resident required high oxygen needs and at the time of discharge was utilizing 2 L (liters) of oxygen via nasal cannula. A written physician's telephone order, dated 12/27/25, indicated to administer oxygen at 2 liters per minute as needed for shortness of breath. The telephone order did not include the signature of the nurse who received the order or the date and time the order was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an informed consent was obtained prior to initiating psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 47)Findings include:During an interview, on 3/19/26 at 12:03 p.m., Resident 47's wife indicated after being admitted to the facility Resident 47 experienced an increase in anger and his neurologist ordered Valium (an antianxiety medication). She picked up the prescription from the pharmacy and took the medication to the facility. Resident 47's wife indicated she did not sign an informed consent for the use of the medication and indicated the only person who had asked if she had any questions about the medication was at the pharmacy when she picked up the prescription.The clinical record for Resident 47 was reviewed on 3/23/26 at 1:46 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and anxiety.A physician's order, dated 2/28/26 to 3/5/26, indicated to administer Valium 2 milligrams (mg) once a day, as needed, for anxiety and agitation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a resident's significant weight loss for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notification of change. (Resident 7)Findings include:During an observation, on 3/19/26 at 12:26 p.m., Resident 7 was not eating her lunch. The CNA charting indicated the resident refused her lunch. No replacement meal or alternatives offered were charted for her lunch, on 3/19/26.During an observation, on 3/20/26 at 12:37 p.m., Resident 7 ate less than half her lunch.The clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 3/24/26 at 9:45 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy of the right and left arms, and cognitive communication deficit.A hospital discharge document, dated 11/18/25, indicated Resident 7's current ongoing problems included weight loss and malnutrition and the most recent weight in the last 24 hours was 181 lbs. The facility weight log indicated, on 11/18/25, Resident 7 weighed 180.6 pounds.The facility weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order related to a medical condition was obtained for the use of a bed and chair alarm, an initial physical restraint assessment was completed, and an interdisciplinary team (IDT) note which discussed the least restrictive interventions implemented first had failed and to review the use of the devices at least quarterly for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for physical restraints. (Resident 81)Findings include:During an observation, on 3/20/26 at 2:19 p.m., Resident 81 had a pull alarm (a device designed to alarm staff when the resident attempted to get up) connected to the resident and her wheelchair. The resident had a device in her room connected to the bed as well.The clinical record for Resident 81 was reviewed on 3/24/26 at 10:55 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, and dementia.A physician's order, dated 9/24/25, indicated to utilize a pull alarm when in the wheelchair every shift.The order had no related diagnosis or indication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold policy was provided to the resident or resident's representative at the time of transfer for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 78)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 78 was reviewed on 3/24/26 at 2:34 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, repeated falls, history of falling, and dementia.A progress note, dated 6/25/25, indicated Resident 78 was noted to be on the floor and complained of back pain. The resident was transferred by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to the hospital.The clinical record did not indicate the bed hold policy was provided to the resident or resident's representative at the time of transfer.During an interview, on 3/26/26 at 9:56 a.m., Social Services14 indicated the staff should document when the bed hold policy was provided to the resident or resident's representative when a resident was transferred to the hospital.During an interview, on 3/26/26 at 10:12 a.m., Social Services14 indicated she found the note about the transfer,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure mental health services were provided for a resident with several mental health disorders for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for mood and behavior. (Resident 12)Findings include:During an observation and interview, on 3/19/26 at 10:37 a.m., Resident 12 was in bed and indicated she did not receive mental health services but would like to attend therapy sessions.During an observation and interview, on 3/25/26 at 1:57 p.m., Resident 12 was in bed and was thinking about going to the ice cream bar activity downstairs. She indicated staff had not asked if she would like to attend therapy and wished staff would because she could use it.The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 3/23/26 at 12:36 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder, conversion disorder, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, delusional disorder, and dementia.Resident 12 was admitted to the facility, on 9/5/25, after an extended in-patient stay at a psychiatric hospital.A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed enhanced barrier precautions and wore personal protective equipment which included a gown during catheter care for 1 of 1 resident randomly observed for infection control. (Resident 93)Findings include:During an observation of catheter care, on 3/24/26 at 11:05 a.m., CNA 13 and Unit Manager 7 were in the room for Resident 93's catheter care. CNA 13 performed catheter care and did not wear a gown during the process.The clinical record for Resident 93 was reviewed on 3/24/26 at 3:26 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, benign neoplasm of the bladder, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and a stroke affecting the left non-dominant side.A physician's order, dated 12/17/25, indicated enhanced barrier precautions every shift for the indwelling catheter.During an interview, on 3/24/26 at 11:16 a.m., Unit Manager 7 indicated a gown should be worn when performing catheter care.During an interview, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident B and C)Findings include:1. During an observation, on 11/11/25 at 3:12 p.m., Resident B had a healed scar from a laceration above her right eyebrow.The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 11/11/25 at 10:25 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, generalized anxiety disorder, mood disorder, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, altered mental status, and dementia.A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/10/25, indicated Resident B had a severe cognitive impairment. The resident required maximal assistance to maintain personal hygiene which included combing hair, shaving, applying makeup, and washing/drying face and hands.A care plan, dated 10/13/25, indicated the resident was at risk of psychosocial distress. Interventions included, but were not limited to, offer reassurance she was safe in the facility.In a facility witness statement,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered care plan was developed with individualized interventions and reviewed and revised to accommodate the resident's care needs prior to initiating a medication to control behaviors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dementia care. (Resident C)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 7/17/25 at 10:06 am. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle weakness. A handwritten document, titled Behavior Sheet, dated 6/17/25, indicated Resident C had a sexually inappropriate behavior when he grabbed CNA 1's butt with both his hands. She was standing him up to move him to his wheelchair when he touched her. The CNA provided the resident with instructions or redirected him, which improved the behavior immediately.The handwritten note was provided after the start of the survey and was not located in Resident C's medical record. A handwritten document, titled Behavior Sheet, dated 6/21/25, indicated Resident C inappropriately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment which included prior interventions, risks and benefits, and the clinical rationale for the initiation of a medication to control behaviors was completed and documented for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident C)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 7/17/25 at 10:06 am. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle weakness. A handwritten document, titled Behavior Sheet, dated 6/17/25, indicated Resident C had a sexually inappropriate behavior when he grabbed CNA 1's butt with both his hands. She was standing him up to move him to his wheelchair when he touched her. The CNA provided the resident with instructions or redirected him, which improved the behavior immediately.The handwritten note was provided after the start of the survey and was not located in Resident C's medical record. A handwritten document, titled Behavior Sheet, dated 6/21/25, indicated Resident C inappropriately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's behaviors were documented in the electronic medical record for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a complete and accurate clinical record. (Resident C)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 7/17/25 at 10:06 am. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle weakness. The following were provided by the Executive Director, on 7/18/25 at 11:00 a.m.:A handwritten document, titled Behavior Sheet, dated 6/17/25, indicated Resident C had a sexually inappropriate behavior when he grabbed CNA 1's butt with both his hands. She was standing him up to move him to his wheelchair when he touched her. The CNA provided the resident with instructions or redirected him, which improved the behavior immediately.The handwritten note was provided after the start of the survey and was not located in Resident C's medical record. A handwritten document, titled Behavior Sheet, dated 6/21/25, indicated Resident C inappropriately physically touched CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when a resident sustained an injury during a transfer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notification of change. (Resident B) Findings include: During a telephone interview, on 6/16/25 at 9:43 a.m., Resident B's family member indicated Resident B had to be sent to the emergency room. The facility reported the resident had a skin tear, but it was a laceration which required seven staples. The family was not notified until Resident B was sent to the hospital. During an observation, on 6/16/25 at 9:27 a.m., Resident B had a wound on the outer aspect of her lower left leg. The wound was approximately two centimeters long and closed with six staples. It was bruised around the area. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/16/25 at 9:40 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, unsteadiness on feet, and muscle weakness. A facility document, titled Skin Tear, dated 6/10/25 at 9:50 p.m., LPN 3 notified the on-call physician on 6/10/25 at 10:14 p.m. A Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was kept safe during a transfer for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) Findings include: During a telephone interview, on 6/16/25 at 9:43 a.m., Resident B's family member indicated Resident B had to be sent to the emergency room. The facility reported the resident had a skin tear, but it was a laceration which required seven staples. During an observation, on 6/16/25 at 9:27 a.m., Resident B had a wound on the outer aspect of her lower left leg. The wound was approximately two centimeters long and closed with six staples. It was bruised around the area. During an observation, on 6/17/25 at 10:33 a.m., with LPN 6, the bed frame was observed to be covered with sheep skin. The edges under the sheep skin covering felt rounded along the frame and at the joints where the frame connected. The underside was found to have metal bolts, but they did not stick out and were inside of the bed frame. There was no area on the bed frame found sticking out. The bed frame had no sharp edges. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sufficient number of staff were available to provide residents nursing care and other related services to the residents. (Resident 187, 56, 34, 20, 73, 30 and 66) This deficient practice had the potential to affect 88 of 88 residents. Findings include: A Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) for the 1st quarter of 2025 indicated the facility scored a 1-star staffing rating. 1. During an observation, on 3/12/25 at 9:31 a.m., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 17 answered the call light for Resident 187. The family had pushed the call light and asked QMA 17 if they could take the resident to the bathroom. QMA 17 indicated they would, but they would have to wait for another aide to be available since the resident was a 2 person assist, and the other aide was busy. During an interview, on 3/12/25 at 10:10 a.m., QMA 17 indicated this hall was staffed fine but Terrace Hall needs more staffing. It can take longer than they want to get their work done…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used adequate testing equipment, such as a working thermometer, to ensure adequate washing of the dishware in the high temperature dishwasher. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 88 of 88 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: During an observation and interview, on 3/11/25 at 9:50 a.m., the wash cycle thermometer on the dishwasher was not working. [NAME] 21 indicated the dishwasher was a high temperature dishwasher. She was not sure why the thermometer gauge was not working or what they were using to gauge the temperature. During an observation and interview, on 3/11/25 at 9:50 a.m., [NAME] 23 was running the dishes through the dishwasher. He indicated he was not sure why the thermometer was not working and was not sure how the temperature was gauged before washing the dishes. During an interview, on 3/11/25 at 10:23 a.m., Maintenance 24 indicated the gauge had been broken. He was not sure how they were gauging the temperature. During an interview, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was given notification of the resident's transfer and discharge to the hospital for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. (Resident 2, 12, 74 and 237) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 3/11/25 at 4:16 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fever, respiratory infection, and hallucinations/delusions. The resident was transferred out of the facility and to the hospital on [DATE] for fever and respiratory infection and 1/24/25 for new/worsening hallucinations/delusions. The facility was unable to provide notification to the Ombudsman of the transfer. 2. The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 3/11/25 at 4:11 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, type 2 diabetes, and muscle weakness. The resident was transferred out of the facility and to the hospital due to hallucinations and aggressive behavior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
A current facility policy, titled Catheters, undated and received from the Clinical Support Nurse on 3/14/25 at 1:30 p.m., indicated .Insertion, ongoing care and catheter removal protocols that adhere to professional standards of practice and facility protocol and procedure with adherence to infection prevention and control techniques A current facility policy, titled Hand Hygiene, undated and received from Corporate Support Nurse on 3/17/25 at 10:40 a.m., indicated .If hands are not visibly soiled, use an alcohol-based hand rub for routinely decontaminating hands in all other clinical situations. Some of these situations included .before putting on and taking off gloves A current facility policy, titled GUIDELINES FOR INFECTION CONTROL/ISOLATION, dated as reviewed 2/2023 and received from the Director of Nursing on 3/17/25 at 1:48 p.m., did not cover walking in halls/common areas in PPE. Donning and Doffing PPE: Proper Wearing, Removal and Disposal (reviewed October 3, 2022) was retrieved on 3/19/25 from the Centers of Disease Control (CDC) website. The guidance included the need…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the need for a bed and chair alarm was re-evaluated and on-going monitoring was documented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for physical restraints. (Resident 49) Findings include: During an observation, on 3/13/25 at 9:49 a.m., Resident 49 had a bed alarm and a chair alarm. The clinical record for Resident 49 was reviewed on 3/13/25 at 9:48 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, mild cognitive impairment, and abnormalities of mobility. A physician's order, with a start date of 7/1/23, indicated to use a bed sensor alarm while the resident was in bed every shift for falls. A physician's order, with a start date of 3/29/24, indicated to place a chair sensor in the resident's chair while she was in her room every shift for falls. A fall risk review assessment, dated 1/14/25, indicated the resident did not have a history of falling within the past 3 months. The last documented fall in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) was 9/17/24. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were held quarterly and timely upon admission for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for care plan meetings. (Resident 12 and 30) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 3/11/24 at 4:16 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes, dementia, and muscle weakness. A care plan note was documented for September 2024 and March 2025. There were no notes found to show a care plan meeting had been held after September and prior to March. During an interview, on 3/13/25 at 9:57 a.m., the Social Service Designee indicated she was not able to find documentation for a care plan meeting between 9/24 and 3/25. She indicated care plan meetings were to be completed quarterly. 2. During an interview, on 3/12/25 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 30 indicated she did not have a care plan meeting until 3/11/25. The clinical record for Resident 30 was reviewed on 3/17/25 at 3:43 p.m. The diagnoses included,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) care were assisted to the bathroom timely, and staff followed a physician's order related to footwear during a transfer for 2 of 2 dependent residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident 187) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 3/12/25 at 9:31 a.m., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 17 answered the call light for Resident 187. The family had pushed the call light and asked QMA 17 if they could take the resident to the bathroom. QMA 17 indicated they would, but they would have to wait for another aide to be available since the resident was a 2 person assist, and the other aide was busy. During an observation, on 3/12/25 at 10:28 a.m., QMA 17 and another staff member went into the room to take Resident 187 to the bathroom. Resident 187 waited 57 minutes to be taken to the bathroom. During an interview, on 3/12/25 at 10:45 a.m., QMA 17 indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with catheters had physician's orders in place for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for catheters. (Resident 59, 56 and 10) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 3/11/25 at 12:03 p.m., Resident 59 was observed sitting in his recliner. A catheter bag was noted to be draining to gravity. The clinical record for Resident 59 was reviewed on 3/13/25 at 11:01 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fall, acute kidney failure, and hypertension. The resident did not have a physician's order for an indwelling catheter. During an interview, on 3/13/25 at 11:12 a.m., LPN 6 indicated a resident needed to have a physician's order for a catheter. She indicated Resident 59 did not have an order for the catheter. 2. During an observation, on 3/11/25 at 11:00 a.m., Resident 56 was sitting on his recliner. A urinary catheter was attached to the side of the recliner. The clinical record for Resident 56 was reviewed on 3/13/25 at 8:08 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label an oxygen line with the date it was put into use, to store an oxygen line in a bag when not in use, to ensure oxygen orders were in place, and to discard a nebulizer mask and tubing which was no longer in use for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 59, 140 and 71) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 3/12/25 at 10:12 a.m., Resident 59 had an oxygen concentrator with the oxygen line and nasal cannula attached. The line was found to be missing the date it was initiated. During an interview, on 3/12/25 at 10:22 a.m., LPN 6 was observed to write a date on the tubing for 3/12/25. She indicated the line should have been changed on the night shift but was not documented and she would have to call the nurse and check. During an observation, on 3/13/25 at 10:26 a.m., the oxygen line for Resident 59 was observed to be wrapped up and laying on top of the oxygen concentrator and not in a bag. The line was dated for 3/12/25. During an interview, on 3/13/25 at 10:29 a.m., QMA 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse coverage was provided for at least 8 consecutive hours in a 24-hour day for 1 of 14 days reviewed for RN coverage. (3/2/25) Findings include: The Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) was reviewed and indicated the facility received a 1-star staffing rating for the first quarter of 2025. The daily nursing staff schedule, dated 3/2/25, indicated there was not a Registered Nurse (RN) in the facility for 8 consecutive hours that day. During an interview, on 3/18/25 at 2:06 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the facility did not currently have a staffing scheduler, so she had been responsible for the nursing schedule. She indicated there was not a Registered Nurse scheduled to be in the facility for any shift on the date of 3/2/25. The weekend option RN who normally worked was on vacation and when the open shift was filled, it was overlooked. There should be an RN in the building covering at least an 8-hour shift in a 24-hour period. A current facility policy, titled Registered Nurse Coverage, undated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy received a medication authorization and a resident did not have to provide their personal home supply until the medication was authorized for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pharmacy services (Resident 71) and failed to ensure narcotic count sheets were signed by the in-coming and out-going staff for 4 of 4 narcotic log books reviewed. Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 3/11/25 at 10:26 a.m., Resident 71 indicated she was not getting her Creon (a medication which replenished enzymes for digestion of food) and it was to be given with meals. A care plan, dated 2/25/25, indicated the resident was at risk for weight loss, pain, fatigue and other complications related to a cancer diagnosis and to administer medications as ordered. The clinical record for Resident 71 was reviewed on 3/13/25 at 11:47 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pancreatic cancer, diabetes mellitus, and myasthenia gravis (an auto-immune disorder). A physician's order, dated 2/20/25, indicated to give 2 capsules…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring for potential side effects of psychotropic medications were in place for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 73) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 73 was reviewed on 3/17/25 at 2:08 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, delusional disorder, visual hallucinations, depression, and neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies. 1. A physician's order, dated 3/12/25, indicated Resident 73 was to take Depakote Sprinkles (a medication commonly used for bipolar disorder symptoms), two times a day, for delusional disorder. A physician's order, dated 3/10/25, indicated Resident 73 was to take haloperidol (an antipsychotic medication), as needed (PRN), for delusions and agitation. A physician's order, dated 3/10/25, indicated Resident 73 was to take Risperdal (an antipsychotic medication), two times a day, for delusional disorder. A physician's order, dated 8/24/24 and discontinued on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at palatable and appetizing temperatures for 1 of 1 room tray observed. (the terrace unit) Findings include: During an interview, on 3/12/25 at 9:48 a.m., Resident 66 indicated the food was sometimes served cold. During an interview, on 3/12/25 at 11:13 a.m., Resident 10 indicated the food was served cold. During an observation and interview, on 3/14/25 at 1:09 p.m., Kitchen Manager 16 took a temperature of a room tray which was about to be delivered on the Terrace unit. The chili dog temperature was 110 degrees, and the corn was 85 degrees. Kitchen Manager 16 indicated both items should have temped at 145 degrees. The resident council meeting minutes were reviewed on 3/13/25 at 10:32 a.m., and indicated: a. March 2024, the old business indicated the food was still cold. b. January 2025, the new business indicated the serving time of the food could be better and they needed more nursing staff. During a meeting with the resident council, on 3/13/25 at 1:56 p.m., the 2 residents in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure unlicensed staff notified a licensed staff member when a resident was found to have discolored areas located on both shoulders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for an injury of unknown origin. (Resident 2) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 12/30/24 at 11:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cognitive communication deficient, atrial fibrillation, and dementia. A facility shower sheet, dated 6/26/24 and signed by a QMA on the nurse signature line, indicated .red bruising was found on both shoulders. On the same document, dated 6/28/24, the resident was given a bed bath. There was no note of bruising on the sheet. The next entry on the same document, dated 7/5/24, indicated the resident had a shower. Faded bruising was noted at the area of both shoulders and the upper chest area. A facility document, titled SHOWER SHEET:SKIN CHECKS, dated 6/29/24 and provided by the Director of Nursing on 12/31/24 at 9:06 a.m., indicated the resident had .bruising near collarbone A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-08 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure dietary employees had competency and skills in the operation of the dishwasher. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 93 of 93 residents who consumed meals prepared by the facility kitchen. Findings include: During an interview on 3/8/23 at 10:51 a.m., the DON indicated all 93 of the facility's residents consumed foods orally. During an observation of the dishwasher operation on 3/8/24 at 9:17 a.m., Dietary Aide 6 sprayed dishes and placed them on a tray/rack to go into the dishwasher. During an interview on 3/8/24 at 9:17 a.m., Dietary Aide 6 indicated he was a new employee and this was his first time operating the dishwasher. He was being trained, however no one was with him at the moment because staffing was short. He did not know what temperature the dishwasher was supposed to reach during the washing or rinsing process. He did not know anywhere in the kitchen where this information was listed. He would need to ask for assistance. During an observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order, complete assessments, document care plans, and complete daily function testing for residents wearing personal body alarms. (Residents 20 and 43) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/8/24 at 2:12 p.m., Resident 20 was seated in her recliner with a pull tab alarm clipped to her left shoulder. The resident was sleeping. Resident 20's clinical record was reviewed 3/8/24 at 2:15 p.m. Her diagnosis included unspecified dementia, history of falling, and cognitive communication deficits. A 1/4/24 Fall Risk care plan indicated interventions included the following: 1/2 side rails to bed to provide assist with mobility and positioning, monitor for changes in gait/positioning, and an alarm x 30 days. The clinical record lacked a physician's order for a personal body alarm. The clinical record lacked assessment related to the use of an alarm for fall risk prevention by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). The clinical record lacked documentation Resident 20's family or representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed notify a resident's responsible party of an allegation of abuse, in accordance with facility policy, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for the implementation of the abuse protocol (Resident B). Findings include: Review of a 2/8/24 facility self reported incident indicated a coworker alleged CNA 100 had spoken to Resident B in an upset tone. A 2/8/24 Confidential Witness Statement indicated CNA 100 pointed her finger at Resident B and spoke to him in an upset tone because the resident was in the hallway yelling about the noise from the dining cart. During an interview, on 3/5/24 at 11:51 a.m., with Resident B's representative, she indicated she had not been informed of an employee speaking to the resident in an unkind manner. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 3/5/24 at 2:39 p.m. Current diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, anxiety, and depression. A 1/18/24, quarterly, Minimum Data Set assessment indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired, understood others, and did not display any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident for pain, address her concerns and distress, and notify the physician of resident pain and distress for 1 of 2 resident's reviewed for pain management. (Resident 197) Findings include: During a random observation on 3/4/24 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 197 was observed in her room in bed, positioned on her back. She was moaning loudly and indicated she felt cold. The resident was observed to have a sheet and a blanket over her body. She indicated several times, Why is it so cold, I just keep shaking. Several staff members were observed walking past the resident's room and not addressing the resident's concerns. At 10:33 a.m., QMA 9 was seated at a small desk in the hallway, entering information into a computer. The resident continually moaned and indicated she was cold and requesting someone to help her get warm. At 10:58 a.m., a staff member was observed in her room putting clothes away. The resident was heard calling for her Mother and for help. The staff member indicated to the resident to stop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to discard an expired insulin pen and to indicate a date opened on another insulin pen, and label over-the-counter medications with resident identifiers for 2 of 3 medication carts observed for medication storage. (Orchard Hall and Garden Hall medication carts) Findings include: 1. During observation of the Orchard Hall medication cart on [DATE] at 10:17 a.m., accompanied by QMA 9, the following was observed: A Lantus Solostar insulin pen (to treat diabetes) without an opened date. QMA 9 indicated the pen contained 240 units. A Humalog QuikPen (to treat diabetes) with a do not use after date of [DATE]. QMA 9 indicated the pen should have been discarded. Two unopened bottles of Daily Multivitamin Men's Health (a supplement) without a resident's identifiers. An unopened box of NightTime Cold and Flu (to treat cold or flu) without a resident's identifiers. 2. During an observation of the Garden Hall medication cart on [DATE] at 10:31 a.m., accompanied by LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 4 residents being reviewed for respect and dignity. (Residents B and F) Findings include: A document, titled Indiana State Department of Health Survey Report System, dated 10/24/23, indicated Resident B voiced concerns regarding care provided to her by CNA 1 on 10/23/23. The five-day follow-up indicated the facility suspended CNA 1 while the investigation was being completed, but was unable to substantiate the specific incident, which occurred on 10/23/23. However, during the investigation, the facility discovered negative findings regarding CNA 1 and chose to move forward with her termination. During an interview, on 10/24/23 at 3:15 p.m., the Executive Director (ED) indicated CNA 1 was terminated for customer service after her investigation was completed. She had received more complaints regarding this staff member's customer service during the investigation and she thought it was best to terminate her. 1. During an interview, on 10/25/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a chest X-ray was completed for 1 of 3 residents being reviewed for diagnostic services. (Resident E) Finding includes: An Intake Information indicated Resident E had a raspy sore throat and a cough. An order was written for a chest X-ray. The resident was told the X-ray company was coming the evening of 10/9/23. The X-ray company called on 10/9/23 around 9 p.m., indicating the staff members car broke down and someone would be at the facility on Tuesday (10/10/23). The X-ray company did not come to do the chest X-ray until the morning of 10/13/23 and the resident had been sent to the hospital. During an interview, on 10/23/23 at 12:15 p.m., the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) indicated Resident E was admitted to the hospital on [DATE], for signs and symptoms of pneumonia. They received a phone call from the hospital, on 10/13/23, Resident E had Legionella. The record for Resident E was reviewed on 10/24/23 at 2:15 p.m. Diagnoses included, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$20,494 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $10,247 — penalty dated 2024-01-09
- $10,247 — penalty dated 2024-01-09
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-25 for 33 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 68 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 68; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/01/2013 |
| JUDAY, PAULA | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 06/01/2015 |
| DECOLA, ROBERT | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/16/2019 |
| BERKHOUSE, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/18/2021 |
| DUNKLE, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2019 |
| MILLER'S HEALTH SYSTEMS INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2013 |
| THE WATERS OF TIPTON SKILLED NURSING FACILITY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155556. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.