Waters Of Dillsboro-Ross Manor, The
12803 Lenover St, Dillsboro, IN 47018 · For profit - Corporation · 123 certified beds · (812) 432-5226 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.7% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.4% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 66.7% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 3.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.5% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.8% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.7% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.4% | 23.3% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.6% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.7% | 79.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.3% | 22.2% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.2% | 10.8% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.26 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.92 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 19.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.3%CMS range 33.8–60.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 6.7–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 19.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 9.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 9.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 3.8–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.28 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 66.3 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a maintenance staff removed lye-based chemical drain cleaner from the bathroom of vulnerable resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident C) This deficient practice resulted in the resident ingesting the chemical liquid and sustaining low-grade esophageal injury and moderate-grade gastric injury that required intensive care at an acute care hospital. Findings include: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/27/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia, hypertension, and paranoid schizophrenia (a subtype of schizophrenia characterized by persistent delusions and hallucinations). The resident had no documented behaviors of inattention, disorganized thinking or altered level of consciouness. She had symptoms of feeling down or depressed a total of three time during the assessment review. The resident had no prior history of consuming harmful chemicals. A Progress Note, dated 01/07/25 at 11:23 A.M., indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act promptly regarding residents' concerns voiced during the Resident Council meetings for 4 of 12 months of meeting minutes reviewed. (August, September, October, and December 2025) Findings include:During the Resident Council Meeting, on 03/24/2026 at 1:45 P.M., the residents indicated the call lights were not answered in a timely manner and sometimes it took up to an hour to get assistance. The Resident Council Meeting Minutes were reviewed and indicated issues related to call lights were concerns on the following months: -August 2025, Residents indicated nursing staff were sitting in the office discussing personal things instead of coming to help answer call lights when needed. On Station 3 it was taking 45 minutes to an hour to answer call lights, -September 2025, Residents indicated they felt the Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) sat in the nurse's station, didn't respond to the call lights, were forgetting to come back, and were told the CNAs didn't have time, -October 2025, Residents indicated one resident had to go to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store medications appropriately for 3 of 5 medication carts observed. (Upstairs Medication Cart 3-2, Upstairs Medication Cart 3-1, and the Dementia Unit Medication Cart)Findings include:During an initial tour observation, on 03/22/2026 at 9:51 A.M., the Upstairs Medications Cart 3-2 was sitting in the hallway outside the nurse's station, unlocked, and unattended. Three staff members walked by the unlocked medication cart. At 9:52 A.M., a staff member walked by the cart and locked it. Upstairs Medication Cart 3-2 was observed with RN 11 on 03/22/2026 at 9:58 A.M., and contained the following in the bottom of the medication cart drawers:-One loose round tan pill, - One loose oval tan pill,- One small white pill, and - One oval green pill.At the time of the observation RN 11 indicated two of the pills in the bottom of the medication cart were Protonix and Eliquis. Upstairs Medication Cart 3-1 was observed with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 12 on 03/22/2026 at 10:00 A.M., and contained the following:- An unopened and undated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a resident's care plan related to the resident's leg prosthesis for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 3)Findings include:Resident 3 was observed in his room on 03/22/2026 at 10:58 A.M. The resident was sitting in his wheelchair. The resident had an above the knee amputation of his left leg, his prosthetic leg was leaning against his bed. During an observation, on 03/23/2026 at 11:18 A.M., the resident was sitting in his wheelchair, he indicated there was something wrong with his prosthetic leg. The prosthesis was leaning against the side of his bed. He indicated he used to wear the prosthetic leg. During an interview, on 03/25/2026 at 11:12 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 10 indicated Resident 3 did wear his prosthetic leg sometimes. During an interview, on 03/25/2026 at 1:52 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 3 indicated Resident 3 used to wear his prosthetic leg daily and occasionally needed staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a visual impairment received optical services in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for vision. (Resident 33) Findings include:Resident 33 was observed on 03/23/2206 at 11:25 A.M., sitting in her wheelchair in her room. An activity calendar was posted on her wall, and a monthly meal menu was sitting on her bedside table. There were no eyeglasses observed in the resident's room. During an interview, on 03/23/2026 at 11:29 A.M., Resident 33 indicated she had cataract removal surgery some time ago, but she still needed eyeglasses to read. She had an appointment with the eye doctor, but he referred her to a specialist. She went to the specialist, and he referred her back to the regular eye doctor. She kind of got the runaround and did not know what was happening with getting eyeglasses. She enjoyed coloring and reading, but she needed readers. The resident's record was reviewed on 03/23/2026 at 2:16 P.M. A document, scanned into the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines related to urinary catheters for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Urinary Tract Infections (UTI). (Residents 4 and 52)Findings include:1.During an observation, on 03/22/2026 at 10:15 A.M., Resident 4 was sitting in a recliner in the common area of the dementia unit. The resident's feet were propped up, and his urinary catheter drainage bag with a dignity flap, was lying on the floor. There was no dignity bag covering the urinary catheter bag. During an observation, on 03/24/2026 at 2:59 P.M., Resident 4 was sitting in a recliner in the common area of the dementia unit. The resident's urinary catheter drainage bag with a dignity flap, was touching the floor. There was no dignity bag covering the urinary catheter bag. During an observation, on 03/24/2026 at 3:15 P.M., Resident 4 was sitting in a recliner in the common area of the dementia unit. Approximately four to five inches of the resident's urinary catheter drainage bag with a dignity flap, was touching the floor. There was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a newly admitted resident's weight was obtained as ordered and address a significant weight gain for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 11)Findings include:Resident 11's clinical record was reviewed on 03/23/2026 at 1:49 P.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/03/2026, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, hypertension, and morbid obesity. The nutrition section of the assessment indicated the resident had not experienced a weight loss or weight gain of 5% or more in the last month or a weight loss or weight gain of 10% or more in last 6 months. The resident was 5' 3'' and weighed 365 pounds (lbs.). The resident's current physician's orders included an open-ended order, with a start date of 03/01/2026 to obtain the resident's weight once a week on Sundays. The March Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) indicated the following:- On 03/01/2026, the resident's weight was 365 lbs.,- On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have medications available for a resident for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident 4)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 03/23/2026 at 2:52 P.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/09/2026, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease (a progressive, incurable neurodegenerative disorder and the most common cause of dementia) and anxiety. The current, open-ended physician's order, with a start date of 02/24/2026, indicated the resident was to be administered Risperdal (an antipsychotic medication) 2 milliliters (ml) intramuscularly, every 14 days for delusions. The February and March 2026 Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) indicated the resident had not received the medication on 02/24/2026 and 03/24/2026. A Progress Note, dated 02/24/2026 at 11:05 A.M., indicated the resident had not received the Risperdal medication due to the medication not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate resident records related to medication administration for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for medical records. (Resident 36)Findings include:Resident 36's record was reviewed on 03/23/2026 at 2:11 P.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/02/2026, indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, diabetes (a chronic metabolic disease characterized by high blood glucose due to the body's inability to produce enough insulin or effectively use the insulin it makes).The resident's physician's orders included, but were not limited to, a current, open-ended order, with a start date of 01/15/2026, for Lantus (a long-acting insulin). The resident was to receive 10 units every morning (between 8:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M.) and at bedtime (between 8:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M.) for diabetes. The resident's February and March 2026 Electronic Medication Administration Records (EMARs) were reviewed and there were blank spaces that indicated the resident did not receive the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control guidelines for a resident with indwelling devices and for a resident during medication administration for 2 of 20 residents reviewed for infection control. (Residents 6 and 7)Findings include:1a.During an interview, on 03/22/2026 at 10:35 A.M., Resident 6 gave permission to observe care related to her indwelling urinary catheter. During an observation, on 03/23/2026 at 1:07 P.M., Resident 6 was in her room in bed. Approximately three inches of her indwelling urinary catheter bag was touching the floor. There was no clean barrier between the bag and the floor. During an observation, on 03/23/2026 at 2:26 P.M., Resident 6 was in her room in bed. Approximately three inches of her indwelling urinary catheter bag was touching the floor. There was no clean barrier between the bag and the floor. The clinical record for Resident 6 was reviewed on 03/23/2026 at 1:15 P.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/11/2026, indicated the resident was severely cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide behavior health services for a resident who required 15-minute monitoring for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for behaviors. (Resident C) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 02/05/2026 at 10:10 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/21/2025, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar (a chronic mental health condition) and non-Alzheimer's dementia (a progressive, irreversible brain disorder). A Psychiatric Progress Note, dated 01/27/2026 at 11:46 A.M. , indicated Resident C had increased physical and verbal aggression towards peers, and was currently on one-on-one staff monitoring. The staff and provider determined Resident C was currently not a risk of harm to himself or to his peers. The provider ordered 15-minute monitoring for 72 hours unless an inpatient facility accepted the resident prior to initiating the monitoring. Resident Location Monitoring Forms were provided by the Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-18 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity related to Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care and monitoring inventory of personal belongings for 4 of 9 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Residents B, C, K, and L) Findings include:1. During an interview and observation, on 07/17/25 at 10:17 A.M., Resident B indicated she was bruised during ADL care a couple of weeks ago. Staff members had come into her room early in the morning, after breakfast, and said she was going to take a shower. The resident held onto the grab bar on the side of the bed and kept saying she refused. The staff peeled her fingers off her side grab bar and proceeded to use the mechanical lift, transferred her to a shower chair, and forced her to take a shower. The resident indicated she was just bruised on her hands. There were no visible bruises observed to the resident's hands. The resident indicated she gave one of the aides a good titty twister when they got one of her hands loose, she should not have touched the aide, she was just…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat and identify pressure ulcers in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident C)Findings include:During an observation, on 07/18/25 at 10:19 A.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA), answered Resident C's call light. The resident indicated she needed to get off the bed pan. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) assisted the QMA to get the resident off the bed pan. The ADON cleansed the resident and left the room. She returned with a cream and applied it to the resident's bottom. She told the resident she didn't put the cream on her wounds just around them because the wounds would need a treatment put in place. The resident had a wound to the right posterior thigh that was pink in color with to drainage. The wound was pea size and did not have a dressing in place. The resident also had a wound on the coccyx that was a slit that was approximately the size of pencil lead. The wounds were shown by the ADON. The staff applied a brief and dressed the resident with pants. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 2 of 2 wound care observations. (Residents C and F) Findings include:1.During an observation, on 07/18/25 at 11:01 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) entered Resident C’s room and indicated that she was going to apply a dressing to her wounds. The resident was rolled to her left side, her pants and brief were removed, and a treatment was applied to the resident’s right posterior thigh. The resident’s brief was reapplied, her pants were pulled up, and the resident’s full body mechanical lift pad was hooked up to the lift. The nurse was questioned about the coccyx wound not having a treatment in place at that time. The ADON nor the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) in the room had donned gowns prior to the treatment of the right posterior thigh wound. During an observation, on 07/18/25 at 11:15 A.M., the ADON returned to the resident’s room and applied the treatment to the coccyx. The ADON nor the CNA had donned gowns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff supervised a resident that resided on a secured unit when off the unit for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards. (Resident C) Findings include: Upon entering the facility on 06/16/25 at 4:25 P.M., on the first floor of the facility, there were no staff observed anywhere on or near the outside of the locked unit. There were three residents sitting in the dining room, outside the locked unit, including Resident C. There was an exit door approximately 10 feet to the right of where Resident C was sitting. During an observation, on 06/16/25 at 4:30 P.M., Dietary Staff 15 knocked on the dementia unit door and no staff answered the door. The door had a window that was approximately four feet by four feet and was 4.5 feet high. The dietary staff member indicated she was unsure of what the code was to get into the locked unit. The dietary staff left the area and then went upstairs to the second floor. Resident C was still sitting in the dining room outside the dementia unit with no staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide medications in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/16/25 at 5:30 P.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 04/11/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and malnutrition. A physician's order, dated 04/16/24 through 05/29/25, indicated the staff were to administer the resident's Cyproheptadine (an antihistamine) 4 milligrams, three times a day for itching. The May 2025 Electronic Medication Administration Record indicated the resident did not receive the medication on the following dates and times due to it nor being available: From 05/19/25 through 05/23/25 for the 8:00 A.M. dose and the 2:00 P.M. dose. The clinical record lacked documentation that the physician was notified that the resident's medications were not available. During an interview, on 06/17/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a STAT x-ray in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for radiology services. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/16/25 at 5:30 P.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 04/11/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and malnutrition. A Progress Note, dated 05/23/25 at 6:15 P.M., indicated the resident was noted to have some swelling and discoloration to the right lower leg. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) was notified, and a new order was obtained for a STAT (immediately) x-ray of the knee, ankle, and extended tibia/fibula. A Progress Note, dated 05/24/25 at 12:40 P.M., indicated the resident's x-ray was obtained and a new order was received to send the resident to the local emergency room. A Radiology X-Ray Report, dated 05/24/25 at 12:23 P.M., indicated the resident had a two view, right tibia and fibula x-ray. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document a resident's behaviors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medical records. (Resident B) Findings include: During an interview, on 06/16/25 at 6:46 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 5 indicated Resident B had been having more behaviors during care for the last two to three weeks related to kicking her legs. The CNAs didn't have access to document a resident's behaviors. The CNAs had to let the nurse know and the nurse would document on the resident's record. She had told Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4 and LPN 6 about the resident's behavior related to kicking her legs. During an interview, on 06/17/25 at 10:40 A.M., LPN 4 indicated the resident had some behaviors of kicking during care. The resident behaviors would be documented in the Electronic Medication Administration Record/Electronic Treatment Administration Record (EMAR/ETAR) or a progress note. During an interview, on 06/17/25 at 11:39 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated after interview staff, from 05/24/25 through 05/29/25. It was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident D) Finding included: A Progress note, dated 04/13/25 at 5:58 P.M., indicated Resident D was hitting, pinching, and spitting at staff during care. The resident was wanting to be left alone. The resident was cleaned up and the call light was given to the resident. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/5/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, and depression. The current Care Plan, dated 4/25/22, indicated Resident D was declining. The resident had episodes of declining resident care, medications, treatments, and refused showers. The interventions included, but were not limited to the following: - If resident continues to decline have another staff member approach. - if resident declines, make resident safe and leave; and reapproach in five minutes. During an interview, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications appropriately related to vials of insulin for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed. (Station 3 Medication Cart 2 and Station 2 Medication Cart) Findings include: 1. Medication Cart 2 on Station 3 was observed on [DATE] at 9:23 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2, and included the following: - A Fiasp/Aspart insulin vial for Resident 3, that was 1/4 full. The delivery date on the storage bottle was [DATE]. No open date was on the vial or the storage bottle. The LPN indicated the resident received the insulin four times a day per a sliding scale, but he had not received it yet that day. - A Lispro insulin vial for Resident 64, that was 3/4 full. The delivery date on the storage bottle was [DATE]. No open date was on the vial or the storage bottle. The LPN indicated the resident no longer used the insulin and it should have been removed from the cart. The clinical record for Resident 64 indicated his Lispro insulin had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders related to medication hold parameters (Resident 13) and implement fall interventions of non-skid strips (Resident 54) for 2 of 20 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 13 was reviewed on 03/05/25 at 10:26 A.M. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/15/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, hypertension, dementia, anxiety, and depression. A current open-ended physician's order, with a start date of 01/08/25, indicated the resident was to receive Losartan (a blood pressure medication) 25 milligrams (mg), one time a day. The staff were to hold the medication when the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 110 or the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was less than 70. The January and February 2025 Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) indicated the resident received the medication when the blood pressure was either…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly identify and treat a pressure wound infection in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers/skin impairments. (Resident 64) Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 08/23/24, indicated Resident 64 was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, heart failure, multi-drug-resistant organism infection, diabetes, paraplegia, and malnutrition. The resident was at risk for pressure ulcers and had an unhealed Unstageable (Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) pressure ulcer upon admission. The resident utilized pressure reducing devices for the bed and chair, and pressure ulcer treatments were administered. A Skin and Wound Note, dated 08/19/24, indicated the resident's prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's food preferences were identified and replacement meal options were offered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 76) Findings include: During an interview, on 03/03/25 at 11:19 A.M., Resident 76 indicated he was recently admitted to the facility, and he did not like the food. They brought him eggs and sausage for breakfast, and sometimes oatmeal. He did not like to eat any of those things for breakfast. He was used to eating dry cereal with milk and fruit every day for breakfast at home. He liked to drink his coffee with his breakfast, not before breakfast. They always brought it before the meal, and it was cold by the time he got the food. He just didn't eat breakfast anymore. No one ever came and asked him about what food he liked or didn't like. He had been there a little over two weeks. During an interview on 03/04/25 at 10:27 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated when a resident was admitted to the facility she would usually go and talk to them within a few days to find out what they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medications were available for 1 of 5 residents observed for pharmacy services. (Resident 33) Findings include: Medication administration was observed on [DATE] at 10:56 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4. As the nurse prepared medications for Resident 33, she discovered the resident did not have the physician prescribed Gabapentin 200 milligrams (mg) available. The resident was to receive two 100 mg tablets. The LPN indicated they had gotten a big shipment of medications that morning. The LPN indicated they would do a refill request, and the medication would come in that night. The resident was to receive Gabapentin 200 mg at 11:00 A.M. and at 4:00 P.M. The LPN checked the resident's record and indicated the resident's 200 mg dose was ordered on [DATE] and had not been reordered since. The medication cards usually held 30 pills. She did not know where the list was indicating what medications were delivered on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a wound culture in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for infections. (Resident 64) Findings include: Resident 64's clinical record was reviewed on 03/05/25 9:57 A.M. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 08/23/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, heart failure, multi-drug-resistant organism infection, diabetes, paraplegia, and malnutrition. The resident was at risk for pressure ulcers and had an unhealed pressure ulcer upon admission. A Skin and Wound Note, dated 12/09/24, indicated the resident's sacral wound measured 8.2 cm x 8 cm, with a depth of 1.4 cm. The wound base was 90% granulation and 10% slough. There was a mild odor after the wound was cleansed. A Progress Note, dated 12/09/24, indicated there was a new physician's order to obtain a wound culture. The Lab Results Report for the wound culture ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control guidelines related to hand hygiene for 2 of 6 residents observed during medication administration. (Residents 52 and 7) Findings include: Medication administration was observed on Station 3 on 03/04/25 at 1:36 P.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4. The nurse prepared a medication, Gabapentin 300 milligrams, at the medication cart in the hallway for Resident 3. The LPN took the medication into the resident's room in a medication cup. The resident had limited use of his hands, and the nurse assisted the resident by moving his straw. The resident's straw was in his personal water bottle. The LPN continued to assist the resident with adjusting his foot pedals and applying the brakes on his wheelchair. The nurse went back to the medication cart, picked up a medication cup, expelled a dose of Carbidopa/Levodopa into a cup for Resident 52, poured water into a plastic cup, put a straw into the cup, closed the medication cart, and locked it. While administering the medication to Resident 52,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities for 1 of 4 stations reviewed. This had the potential to affect 13 of 68 resident residing in the facility. (Memory Springs-Dementia Unit) Findings include: During an interview on 03/21/24 at 9:53 A.M., a family member indicated the Memory Springs Station never had any activities. During a continuous observation on 03/26/24 from 10:06 A.M. through 11:45 A.M., the following was observed: - at 10:06 A.M. two residents were asleep in recliners, and four residents in the dining room, staff were present and talking with a couple of the residents, - at 10:33 A.M., there were four residents in the dining room. Two of the residents were sleeping, 1 resident was eating a snack, and another resident was looking at pictures. The activity calendar was observed hanging on a bulletin board and indicated the resident's were to fold laundry at 10:30 A.M. - at 10:43 A.M., 1 resident left the dining room and there was a CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) in the common area. There was no staff engaging residents in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment related to odors for 1 of 4 stations reviewed. This had the potential to affect 13 of 68 resident residing in the facility. (Memory Springs-Dementia Unit) Findings include: During an observation on 03/20/24 at 9:51 A.M., there was a strong urine odor when entering Memory Springs. During an observation on 03/21/24 at 10:50 A.M., there was a strong urine odor in the common area of Memory Springs. The common area had seven recliners with cloth pads covering the seats. There were two recliners with residents sitting in them, asleep. During an observation on 03/22/24 at 1:41 P.M., there was a urine odor when entering Memory Springs, there were a few residents in the dining room. The common area had several recliners with cloth pads on the seats. The common area was open to the dining room. During and observation on 03/26/24 at 10:06 A.M., the common area in Memory Springs had a urine odor, there were several recliners with cloth pads on them. During an interview on 03/26/24 at 2:31 P.M., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan related to dentures for 1 of 20 residents care plans reviewed. (Resident 37) Findings include: During an interview on 03/21/24 at 10:01 A.M., a family member indicated Resident 37 had dentures, but he usually didn't have them in. He had kept playing with them and someone took them away and never offered them back. During an interview on 03/22/24 at 9:29 A.M., the resident was assisted out of bed by nursing staff member. The resident was assisted to his wheelchair and propelled to the hallway. He was not wearing his dentures. The resident indicated he was unsure of where his dentures were. During an observation on 03/22/24 at 9:32 A.M., the resident was offered a snack and accepted it. He did not have his dentures in and had not been offered them. He proceeded to eat his snack without difficulty. During an observation on 03/22/24 at 11:33 A.M., the resident was sitting at the dining table and served his lunch. The tray was a regular diet. He was eating and was not wearing his dentures. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide routine bathing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care. (Resident B) Findings include: During an observation in the dining room on 03/20/24 at 11:24 A.M., a staff member sat down next to the resident. Staff were assisting another resident at the table and cuing Resident B to keep her awake and focused as she was eating with her bare hands. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 03/26/24 at 11:01 A.M. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 02/03/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and hypertension. The resident was totally dependent on staff members for bathing. The paper shower sheets for January, February, and March 2024, were provided by the DON (Director of Nursing) on 03/26/24 at 10:26 A.M. The records were dated and indicated the following: - On 01/01/24, the resident did not receive a shower, - On 01/07/24, the resident did not receive a shower, - On 01/21/24, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to wound treatments and TED (anti-embolism) hose for 3 of 20 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Residents 44, 61, and 30) Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 03/20/24 at 1:33 P.M., Resident 44 was sitting on a couch in his room and indicated he had a sore on his toe. The clinical record for Resident 44 was reviewed on 03/21/24 at 2:38 P.M. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 02/21/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, anemia, hypertension, non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression and pain in his left foot. A Wound assessment, dated 02/19/24, indicated the resident had an arterial wound to the left foot. A physician's order, dated 12/24/23 through 01/22/24, indicated the staff were to apply betadine moist gauze and alginate, foam, and sterile gauze between the left great toe and second toe, and wrap with gauze, every day shift. A physician's order, dated 01/23/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and store medications appropriately for 2 of 3 medication storage refrigerators observed. (Station 1 medication refrigerator and Station 3 medication refrigerator) Findings include: Medication storage was observed on 03/26/24 at 1:41 P.M., with the ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing). 1. The medication refrigerator on Station 1 contained an open vial of TB (Tuberculin) serum with no label indicating when it was opened. The vial was about half full. The ADON could not recall when the last resident was admitted to the unit. 2. The medication refrigerator on Station 3 contained an open vial of TB serum with no label indicating when it was opened. The vial was one quarter full. The ADON could not recall when the last resident was admitted to the unit. LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 3, who was present at the time, indicated she had administered the serum to Resident 8 last week. During an interview on 03/26/24 at 2:10 P.M., the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated the TB serum vials should be dated when they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to a dignified existence related to toileting and dining for 5 of 7 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. (Residents B, C, E, F, and G) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 8/22/23 at 10:50 a.m., CNA (Certified Nurse's Aide) 2 and CNA 3 entered Resident B's room to check and change him and get him up for lunch. Resident B was in bed, eyes closed, and covered with a blanket. The CNAs did not identify themselves to the resident. CNA 2 told him, Come this way, rolled him to the left, he grabbed the grab bar, then CNA 3 told him, Come this way and rolled him to the right. They checked him, he was clean and dry. They used the lift to transfer him to the wheelchair. Resident B never opened his eyes. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/22/23 at 10:10 a.m. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 5/20/23, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident required two-person extensive assistance for toileting and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 68 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 68; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZOZ, JONI | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/19/2014 |
| HORNER, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/19/2014 |
| THE WATERS OF DILLSBORO-ROSS MANOR, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/19/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155280. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.