No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Waters Of Rockport Skilled Nursing Facility, The

815 W Washington St, Rockport, IN 47635 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (812) 649-2276 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 649-2276 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Mar 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0741, F0744, F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
107 N 2nd St · (812) 437-7246 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
815 Sycamore St · (812) 649-2227 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
509 Main St.
Park
930 Fairground Dr · (812) 649-9647 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.4%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.4%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.1%1.1%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms73.8%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury9.8%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.3%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.9%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.1%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.0%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.6%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.3%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.5%22.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.8%10.8%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 79% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.6%CMS range 32.2–62.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.6–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.391.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
0.45
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.99
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.66
RN hoursweekends
32.4%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 47.0 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.08 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-23)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident received adequate supervision to prevent falls for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. The plan of care was not updated, and interventions were not implemented and reviewed for effectiveness for a high risk to fall resident with severely impaired cognition. This deficient practice resulted in multiple falls, one with major injury, where the resident sustained an acute fracture to right hip/pelvis and subacute left hip fracture. (Resident 28) Findings include: On 5/19/25 at 8:51 A.M., Resident 28 was observed sitting in a Broda chair (specialized seating system) in the east lobby in front of the television, hands empty, and trying to pull on his blanket. On 5/20/25 at 9:51 A.M., Resident 28 was observed sitting in a Broda chair in the east lobby in front of the television, hands empty, and trying to pull on his blanket. On 5/20/25 at 10:00 A.M. an Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) incident report, dated 2/9/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for misappropriation. Three checks were taken from a resident's checkbook by a QMA. The QMA then used two checks in an attempt to transfer money from the resident's bank account to the QMA's account. (Resident D)Finding includes:During a review of facility reported incidents on 3/9/26 at 11:15 A.M., an incident dated 12/2/25, indicated Resident D notified staff that he received a phone call from his bank regarding suspicious activity on his account. QMA 13 was terminated from employment and arrested. Resident D's account was recovered, and proper paperwork was completed to restore funds. A review of the facility's investigation into the incident on 3/9/26 at 1:30 P.M., indicated Resident D's bank notified the resident of suspicious activity on his account on 12/1/25 at 3:30 P.M. On 12/2/25 at 2:00 P.M., Resident D notified staff. Facility staff, along with the resident, contacted the bank and were informed QMA 13 had attempted to cash a check…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed for a newly admitted resident within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 2 newly admitted residents with pressure ulcers. A resident admitted on a Thursday and had no baseline care plan in place until the following Monday. (Resident C)Finding includes:During record review on 3/9/26 at 1:45 P.M., Resident C's diagnoses included but were not limited to, aphasia following other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage.Resident C's admission date was 3/5/26. Resident C's physician orders included but were not limited to, coccyx and right buttock: cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply calcium alginate with Medihoney, and cover with border foam dressing (started 3/5/26). Resident C's record contained no care plan or baseline care plan. During a review on 3/10/26 at 9:30 A.M., Resident C's record contained a baseline care plan for admission, dated 3/9/26 at 4:36 P.M.During an interview on 3/10/26 at 11:30 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated a resident baseline care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided for treatment of an existing pressure ulcer for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Following admission and then readmission from a hospital, a resident's pressure ulcer was not routinely assessed, and wound care orders were not immediately obtained for treatment. (Resident B)Finding includes:During record review on 3/9/26 at 10:15 A.M., Resident B's diagnoses included, but were not limited to muscle wasting and atrophy, protein-calorie malnutrition, anemia, and influenza. Resident B's most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/26/26, indicated the resident admitted to the facility with no unhealed pressure ulcers, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and was dependent for mobility, including rolling in side to side in bed. A Braden scale assessment (tool used to predict the risk for developing pressure ulcers), completed 1/10/26, indicated Resident B was at low risk for developing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure employment of kitchen staff with appropriate competencies and skills. The kitchen manager was not certified. (Kitchen Manager) Finding includes: On 5/19/25 at 5:50 A.M., the Kitchen Manager indicated she did not have a certification in food service. On 5/22/25 at 10:24 A.M., the Regional Dietary Manager indicated she was certified withy Servsafe, but no one else in the kitchen was yet. She indicated all kitchen staff had been registered to take the certification class on 6/20/25. On 5/22/25 at 1:35 P.M., the Regional Director of Operations provided a current non-dated Dietary Manager Orientation policy that indicated The Dietary Manager shall receive appropriate orientation and training 3.1-20(e)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation for 4 of 11 residents reviewed for clinical record accuracy. Residents medications and treatments were left blank on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR). (Resident 136, Resident 19, Resident 30, Resident 9) Findings include: 1. On 5/10/15 at 11:56 A.M., Resident 136's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but was not limited to, encephalopathy and acute respiratory failure. The most recent Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/8/25 indicated Resident 136's cognitive status was unable to be assessed and she had a tracheostomy. Current Physician's Orders included, but was not limited to: Trach: change inner cannula daily, start date 4/9/25 Trach care every shift, start date 4/9/25 The following doses of medication were marked blank on the April 2025 Treatment Administration Record (TAR): Inner cannula changed on dayshift on 4/16, 4/22, and 4/23 Trach care on nightshift on 4/15 and on dayshift on 4/16, 4/22, and 4/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft) per resident in double occupancy rooms and 100 sq. ft. in single occupancy rooms. This was evidenced in 14 of 43 resident rooms in the facility. (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER]) Findings include: During an interview on 5/22/25 10:13 A.M., the Administrator indicated the facility had room size waivers. A list of rooms and sizes was provided and were as follows: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER]: 2 beds with 154.65 total sq. ft. SNF/NF and 77.32 sq. ft. per resident. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER]: 2 beds with 154.65 total sq. ft. SNF/NF and 77.32 sq. ft. per resident. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER]: 2 beds with 154.65 total sq. ft. SNF/NF and 77.32 sq. ft. per resident. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER]: 2 beds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regimen was free from chemical restraints for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident's confusion increased after initiating Zoloft (antidepressant also used to control anxiety) and Ativan (antianxiety). Staff documented administering Ativan was ineffective for controlling the resident's restlessness and anxiety, the resident was given additional doses. (Resident 28) Findings include: On 5/19/25 at 8:51 A.M., Resident 28 was observed sitting in a Broda chair (specialized seating system) in the East Hall lobby in front of the television, hands empty, and trying to pull on his blanket. On 5/20/25 at 9:51 A.M., Resident 28 was observed sitting in a Broda chair in the East Hall lobby in front of the television, hands empty, and trying to pull on his blanket. On 5/22/25 at 10:45 A.M., Resident 28 was observed asleep sitting in a Broda chair in the East Hall lobby. On 5/21/25 at 2:15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment of resident status for 3 of 11 residents reviewed for MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment accuracy. Preadmission screening, antibiotic use, and UTI (urinary tract infection) diagnoses were incorrectly coded. (Resident 6, Resident 4, Resident 9) Findings include: 1. On 5/20/25 at 9:05 A.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. The most recent Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/31/25, indicated a level 2 PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) had not been completed for the resident. A level 2 PASRR was completed on 3/7/24. 2. During an interview on 5/19/25 at 10:55 A.M., Resident 9's family member indicated Resident 9 has had several urinary tract infections (UTI's) since she had been in the facility. On 5/20/25 at 11:57 A.M., Resident 9's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but was not limited to, osteoporosis and and depression. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/13/25, indicated Resident 9 was cognitively impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dementia care. A resident with dementia that was a high risk to fall was not kept active resulting in increased restlessness and multiple falls. (Resident 28) Finding includes: On 5/19/25 at 8:51 A.M., Resident 28 was observed sitting in a Broda chair (specialized seating system) in the East Hall lobby in front of the television, hands empty, and trying to pull on his blanket. On 5/20/25 at 9:51 A.M., Resident 28 was observed sitting in a Broda chair in the East Hall lobby in front of the television, hands empty, and trying to pull on his blanket. On 5/22/25 at 10:45 A.M., Resident 28 was observed asleep sitting in a Broda chair in the East Hall lobby. On 5/22/25 at 11:16 A.M., Activities staff was observed notifying residents by room of activity but walked past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. A resident's plan of care was not developed with interventions to prevent new pressure from developing after the resident was assessed to be at risk for pressure, and no documentation in the resident's record indicated the resident was turned or repositioned in accordance with physician orders. (Resident D) Findings include: During record review on 2/3/25 at 10:30 A.M., Resident D's diagnoses included, but were not limited to weakness, Parkinson's disease, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, type 2 diabetes, dementia, and urge incontinence. Hospice started when? admission date? discharge date ? Resident D's most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/27/24, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility with one unhealed Stage I pressure ulcer. (According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel [NPIAP], a Stage I pressure ulcer is defined as: The skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received food at safe and appetizing temperatures for 1 of 1 meal trays tested for taste and temperature of food. Finding includes: During an observation on 1/23/25 at 7:19 A.M., staff was pushing the enclosed meal tray cart from the kitchen to the [NAME] Hall. During an observation on 1/23/25 at 7:31 A.M., staff was passing the last meal tray for the hall. At that time, a meal tray was obtained to test for the taste and temperatures of the food. The scrambled eggs tested 89.0 degrees Fahrenheit and felt cold. The bacon tested at 76.3 degrees Fahrenheit and felt cold. During an interview on 1/23/25 at 8:06 A.M., Resident H indicated the temperature and variety of food was an ongoing problem. During an interview on 1/23/25 at 8:12 A.M., Resident F indicated the breakfast served to them this morning was barely warm. During an interview on 1/23/25 at 8:19 A.M., Resident J indicated the food was going downhill from when they were first admitted . Meals were either cold, overdone, or raw in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate pharmaceutical services were available to provide physician prescribed routine medications to 4 of 4 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. After the facility's contracted pharmacy failed to deliver routine medications, residents missed multiple prescribed daily medications. (Resident B, Resident C, Resident D, Resident F) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 1/9/25 at 10:45 A.M., Resident B indicated that he typically receives his ordered medications, but that there was an issue with some of the medications during a recent winter storm. During an interview on 1/9/25 at 11:00 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 6 indicated that there was an issue with the facility's contracted pharmacy delivery some of the resident's routine medications a few days prior and that resident went about a day without some of their medications. During record review on 1/9/25 at 11:20 A.M., Resident B's diagnoses included but were not limited to, acquired absence of leg above knee, hypertension, and congestive heart failure.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food service department was directed by a supervisor competent in food service management and knowledgeable in sanitation standards and food handling for 1 of 1 dietary managers reviewed. The dietary manager was not certified. (Dietary Manager) Finding includes: On 4/1/24 at 8:53 A.M., the Dietary Manager's certification and/or qualifications were requested. Employee records were provided and indicated the Dietary Manager's start date was January of 2023. During an interview on 4/4/24 at 8:00 A.M., the Administrator indicated the Dietary Manager was not certified but was enrolled in a class that started in November of 2023 and a goal completion date of November of 2024. On 4/5/24 at 10:43 A.M., the Administrator indicated there was not a policy for the Dietary Manager position requirements, but provided a current Dietary Director Job Description, dated 1/29/24, as a policy which indicated . education/experience: . be a graduate of an accredited course in dietetic training, approved by the American Dietetic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified Infection Preventionist. The full time Director of Nursing was also completing the Infection Preventionist duties. Finding includes: On 4/3/24 at 1:19 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she was the facility's appointed Infection Preventionist (IP). On 4/5/24 at 10:08 A.M., the DON indicated although she was a full time DON, about 8 hours had been spent earlier in the week on IP duties. At that time, she indicated the amount of hours dedicated to IP duties fluctuated depending on the amount of infections in the facility, and sometimes would stay over her usual hours. Hours spent on DON and IP specific duties were not documented. On 4/1/24 at 2:40 P.M., a current non-dated Infection Prevention and Control policy was provided and indicated There will be an appointed person to spearhead the Infection Prevention and Control Program. This person will be a licensed nurse, usually the DON or ADON [Assistant Director of Nursing] On 4/5/24 at 11:48 A.M., a current non-dated Infection Control job…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold policy was given to residents or resident representatives for 8 of 9 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The bed hold form was not completed. There was no documentation of a resident or representative receiving a bed hold at the time of hospitalization. (Resident 17, Resident 30, Resident 29, Resident 8, Resident 19, Resident 21, Resident 10, Resident 7) Findings include: 1. On 4/2/24 at 8:44 A.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed and indicated they were admitted from the facility to the hospital on 1/14/24 and returned back to the facility from the hospital on 1/17/24. Resident 7's records lacked a bed hold policy. 2. On 4/2/24 at 11:55 A.M., Resident 17's clinical record was reviewed and indicated they were admitted from the facility to the hospital on [DATE] and returned back to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. Resident 17's records lacked a bed hold policy. 3. On 4/4/24 at 1:36 P.M., Resident 8's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were completed with the CNA (Certified Nursing Aide) training program and evaluation within 4 months of their hire date for 5 of 5 staff that completed the CNA training program at the facility. The facility lacked information and supplies related to the CNA training program. Findings include: 1. A list of staff that had completed the CNA training program at the facility was provided by the Administrator on 4/2/24 at 11:30 A.M., and indicated the following: On 4/3/24 at 9:47 A.M., employee records were reviewed. Nurse Aide 41 had a start date of 3/23/23 and was not certified. Nurse Aide 43 had a start date of 6/21/23 and was not certified. Nurse Aide 45 had a start date of 8/14/21 and was not certified. Nurse Aide 51 had a start date 9/6/23 and was not certified. Nurse Aide 63 had a start date 6/21/23 and was not certified During an interview on 4/4/24 at 10:45 A.M., Nurse Aide (NA) 45 indicated she performed all CNA duties by herself, but did not take the test to be certified after the CNA class. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring and supervision was done to keep a resident's drug regimen free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident was getting narcotic pain medications from an outside physician. (Resident 29) Finding includes: On 4/3/24 at 8:50 A.M., Resident 29's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart disease, atrial fibrillation, edema, pain, morbid obesity, depression, and anxiety. The most recent Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 1/2/24, indicated Resident 29's cognition was moderately impaired, a limited assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and taking an opiod. Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the following: oxycodone-acetaminophen (Percocet-pain medication) 10-325 mg (milligram), give 1 tablet by mouth every hours as needed for pain, ordered 12/29/23 by the facility Nurse Practitioner (NP) The MARs (Medication Administration Record) were reviewed from September 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and disposal of medications for 2 of 3 medications carts and 1 of 1 medication storage rooms observed. A bottle of medication in the medication cart was not labeled, expired medications and medications of discharged residents were observed in the medication storage room, and medication carts were observed unlocked. (Resident 86, Resident 87, Resident 21, Resident 88, Resident 33, Resident 11, Resident 5, Resident 2, Resident 22, Resident 8) Findings include: 1. During an observation of the East Hall Medication Cart on 4/5/24 at 8:20 A.M., there was a plastic pill container in the locked narcotic box with 2 tablets inside of it. The label of the container was observed with Resident 29's name, oxy-apap [Percocet] 10/325 mg [milligram], and dated 12-15-23. During an interview on 4/5/24 at 10:55 A.M., RN 3 indicated when a narcotic medication came in a bottle from the resident or pharmacy, the staff would put them into the plastic containers because they were numbered and easier to do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 2 observations of the kitchen. Foods were not labeled and open to air. Facial masks were adjusted with hands and food was prepped without sanitizing hands. Plate warmer lids and food containers were held against clothing. Bottom of shoe rested on shelf under table where food serving trays were stored. (Kitchen) Findings include: During the initial tour on 4/1/24 at 8:53 A.M., the following was observed in the kitchen: Refrigerator: Water was on the floor throughout an opened bag of pepperoni, not labeled an opened bag of roast beef meat, with 3/31 wrote on the bag in permanent marker 2 full bags of cabbage, with best if used by dates of 3/11/24 and 3/22/24 a full tray of individually wrapped green colored cake with white icing, not labeled a tray of dessert, not labeled Freezer: a ziploc bag of freezer burnt chicken thighs, with a preparation date of 9/20/23 a full tray of ice cream individually prepped and covered, not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the benefits of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, consents or refusals were obtained for vaccines, and vaccines were offered based on resident preference for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccines. (Resident 1, Resident 15, Resident 3, Resident 23, Resident 26) Findings include: 1. On 4/2/24 at 7:59 A.M., Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, history of stroke and depression. The most recent Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 3/12/24, indicated no cognitive impairment and no behaviors. A nurses note, dated 11/3/23 at 8:54 P.M., indicated Resident 1 received a flu shot with no adverse reactions. Resident 1's clinical record lacked a consent for the flu vaccine administered on 11/3/23. 2. On 4/2/24 at 9:54 A.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, history of fracture and osteoarthritis. The most recent Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 1/4/24, indicated no cognitive impairment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the benefits of Covid vaccines, or consents and/or refusals were obtained for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccines. (Resident 1, Resident 15, Resident 3, Resident 23) Findings include: 1. On 4/2/24 at 7:59 A.M., Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, history of stroke and depression. The most recent Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 3/12/24, indicated no cognitive impairment and no behaviors. A Covid 2023-2024 Booster was administered on 11/27/23. Resident 1's clinical record lacked a signed consent form for the Covid vaccine administered on 11/27/23. 2. On 4/2/24 at 9:54 A.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, history of fracture and osteoarthritis. The most recent Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 1/4/24, indicated no cognitive impairment and no behaviors. A nurses note, dated 11/9/23, indicated Resident 26 denied wanting a Covid Booster. Resident 26's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft) per resident in double occupancy rooms and 100 sq. ft. in single occupancy rooms. This was evidenced in 14 of 43 resident rooms in the facility. (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER]) Findings include: During an interview on 4/1/24 at 12:04 P.M., the Administrator indicated the facility had room size waivers. At that time, a list of rooms and sizes was provided and were as follows: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER]: 2 beds with 154.65 total sq. ft. SNF/NF and 77.32 sq. ft. per resident. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER]: 2 beds with 154.65 total sq. ft. SNF/NF and 77.32 sq. ft. per resident. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER]: 2 beds with 154.65 total sq. ft. SNF/NF and 77.32 sq. ft. per resident. 4. room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that were self administering medications were assessed for capability to self administer medications for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for self administering medications. A resident did not have a physician's order, care plan, or assessment to self administer medications. (Resident 29) Findings include: During an observation on 4/2/24 at 1:04 P.M., Resident 29 was observed laying in his bed asleep. On 4/3/24 at 8:50 A.M., Resident 29's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart disease, atrial fibrillation, edema, pain, morbid obesity, depression, and anxiety. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 1/2/24, indicated Resident 29's cognition was moderately impaired, a limited assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and taking an opiod. Current Physician's Orders lacked an order for Resident 29 to self administer medications. The clinical record lacked a care plan related to self administering medications.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for activities of daily living, 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospice services, and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The MDS inaccurately indicated one resident received a hypoglycemic medication, one resident had a current diagnosis of pneumonia and septicemia, and one resident did not receive hospice services. (Resident 17, Resident 21, Resident 27) Findings include: 1. On 4/1/24 at 11:58 A.M., Resident 21 was observed sitting in her wheelchair eating lunch with her husband in the room who indicated the resident was on hospice care. On 4/2/24 at 12:31 P.M., Resident 21's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and anxiety. The most recent Significant Change MDS Assessment, dated 2/26/24, indicated Resident 21's cognition was moderately impaired, was not receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop care plans for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 1 reviewed for hospice. The facility failed to develop care plans for residents on an anticoagulant, diuretic, antidepressant, risk of opioid overdose, and a resident that received hospice services. (Resident 11, Resident 29, Resident 21) Findings includes: 1. On 4/3/24 at 8:50 A.M., Resident 29's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart disease, atrial fibrillation, edema, pain, morbid obesity, depression, and anxiety. The most recent Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 1/2/24, indicated Resident 29's cognition was moderately impaired, a limited assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and taking an opiod, antidepressant, anticoagulant, diuretic, and antiplatelet. Current Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the following: oxycodone-acetaminophen (Percocet-pain medication) 10-325 mg (milligram), give 1 tablet by mouth every hours as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had knowledge of and appropriate training for Narcan administration for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Staff were not educated and inserviced on the use of Narcan ordered for resident with a history of substance abuse and overdose, the drug was not available for use in the facility. (Resident 29) Finding includes: During an observation on 4/2/24 at 1:04 P.M., Resident 29 was observed laying in his bed asleep. On 4/3/24 at 8:50 A.M., Resident 29's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart disease, atrial fibrillation, edema, pain, morbid obesity, depression, and anxiety. The most recent Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 1/2/24, indicated Resident 29's cognition was moderately impaired, a limited assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and was taking an opiod. Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the following: oxycodone-acetaminophen (Percocet-pain medication) 10-325 mg (milligram), give 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an complete, accurate clinical record for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A narcotic pain medication was documented under the name of the Nurse Practitioner when it was ordered by an outside physician and the clinical record lacked documentation of destroying medications. (Resident 29) Finding includes: On 4/3/24 at 8:50 A.M., Resident 29's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart disease, atrial fibrillation, edema, pain, morbid obesity, depression, and anxiety. The most recent Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 1/2/24, indicated Resident 29's cognition was moderately impaired, a limited assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and was taking an opiod and antidepressant but not an antipyschotic. Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the following: oxycodone-acetaminophen (Percocet-pain medication) 10-325 mg (milligram), give 1 tablet by mouth every hours as needed for pain, ordered 12/29/23 by the facility Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. On 4/3/24 at 11:26 A.M., Resident 27's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, Covid-19 (dated 3/30/24). Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: For COVID-19 + residents record temperature, pulse, respiration, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation every shift (report immediately any temperature 99.1 degrees or higher), dated 4/1/24. Resident 27's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April 2024 indicated a temperature reading of 100 degrees on 4/2/24 day shift, and a temperature reading of 99.1 degrees on 4/2/24 evening shift. Resident 27's clinical record lacked notification to the physician related to the temperature readings on 4/2/24. On 4/5/24 at 2:30 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator indicated notification to the physician related to the temperature readings could not be located. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly prevent and contain COVID-19 to ensure infection control practices were followed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for COVID-19. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-09 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate one or more individual(s) as the Infection Preventionist with qualifying training or certification. The facility did not have a current certified Infection Preventionist for 3 of 5 days of survey. Finding includes: During an interview on 1/3/23 at 8:48 A.M., the Administrator during the Entrance Conference, indicated the Infection Preventionist at this time was only in the facility on an as needed basis. During an interview on 1/6/23 at 8:45 A.M., the Administrator indicated the previous IP (Infection Preventionist) had not worked in the facility since 11/1/22. On 1/6/23 at 9:30 A.M., the Administrator provided a certificate that showed the DON completed the Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course on 1/6/23. On 1/9/23 at 8:14 A.M., the Administrator provided a certificate that showed the ADON completed the Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course on 1/6/23. On 1/9/23 at 10:42 AM, a current, undated Infection Prevention and Control Policy indicated There will be an appointed person to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was revised for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for care planning and care plan conferences were held timely for 6 of 7 residents reviewed for care plan conferences. A resident's care plan indicated they had a current urinary tract infection but they did not and interventions were not updated. Six residents had not had timely care plan conferences. (Resident 6, Resident 9, Resident 12, Resident 17, Resident 25, Resident 26) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 1/3/23 10:53 A.M., Resident 26 indicated they had not been to or invited to any care plan conferences. On 1/4/23 at 8:28 A.M., Resident 26's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 26 was admitted on [DATE], went home on [DATE], and was readmitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), anxiety, wedge compression fracture of T(Thoracic) 11-T 12 vertebra, and difficulty walking. The most recent admission MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 2 trays tested. Finding includes: During an interview on 1/3/23 at 10:22 A.M., Resident 14 and Resident 284, both indicated their food was often cold when they received it in their rooms. On 1/6/23 at 12:28 P.M., the temperatures of the foods on a test tray from the east hall were observed to be: beef and gravy 114.3 degrees Fahrenheit noodles 103.3 degrees Fahrenheit green beans 111.8 degrees Fahrenheit mashed potatoes 113.3 degrees Fahrenheit ice cream 16.3 degrees Fahrenheit peaches 58.8 degrees Fahrenheit Mighty Shake, strawberry 47.2 degrees Fahrenheit During an interview on 1/5/23 at 1:55 P.M. kitchen manager indicated neither she nor the kitchen staff knew what the serving temperature of food served residents' rooms on the unit should be. At that time, Kitchen staff 12 performed an Internet search for temperature serving guidelines, and found that food should be served at 135 degrees F (Fahrenheit). Kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-09 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft) per resident in double occupancy rooms and 100 sq. ft. in single occupancy rooms. This was evidenced in 14 of 43 resident rooms in the facility. (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER]) Findings include: During an interview on 1/4/23 at 1:45 P.M., the Administrator indicated the facility had room size waivers. At that time, a list of rooms and sizes was provided and were as follows: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER]: 2 beds with 154.65 total sq. ft. SNF/NF and 77.32 sq. ft. per resident. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER]: 2 beds with 154.65 total sq. ft. SNF/NF and 77.32 sq. ft. per resident. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER]: 2 beds with 154.65 total sq. ft. SNF/NF and 77.32 sq. ft. per resident. 4. room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment was maintained for 2 of 2 resident halls. Bathroom flooring was loose from the subfloor, a sink was slow to drain, paint was peeling in a resident's room as well as in the hallways, and wallpaper was peeling off the wall. (room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 25, Resident 12, Resident 28, East Hall, [NAME] Hall) Findings include: 1. On 1/3/23 at 10:14 A.M., the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with the flooring coming loose from the subfloor near the doorway. During an observation on 1/9/23 at 9:33 A.M., the same was observed in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. Observation of the east and west hallways began on 1/3/2023 at 8:30 A.M., There were splotches of paint peeling or chipped observed on the walls. On 1/9/23 at 8:45 A.M., no changes were observed to the splotches of paint peeling or chipped on the walls in the east hall and west halls. 3. Resident 25's room on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-09 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were initiated within forty eight hours of admission for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. (Resident 26) Finding includes: On 1/4/23 at 8:28 A.M., Resident 26's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 26 was admitted on [DATE], went home on [DATE], and was readmitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, arteriosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, pain in right and left shoulders, cervicalgia, age-related osteoporosis, generalized muscle weakness, angina pectoris, unsteadiness on feet, anxiety, unspecified mood (affective) disorder,personal history of other mental and behavioral disorders, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, essential (primary) hypertension, GERD (gastro-esophageal reflux disease) without esophagitis,wedge compression fracture of T11-T12 (thoracic) vertebra,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for development of care plans. (Resident 15, Resident 6, Resident 26) Findings include: 1. On 1/3/23 at 2:55 P.M. , Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but were not limited to, anxiety disorder, unspecified dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, difficulty walking. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimal data set) Assessment, dated 12/3/22, indicated Resident 15 was severely cognitively impaired. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: May admit to [name] Hospice, dated 10/27/22 NM (Nursing Measure): May use urine dip stick as needed for s/s (signs and symptoms) infection; if abnormal results may send urine specimen for UA (urinalysis) w/ (with) C&S (culture and sensitivity) as needed for foul smelling urine, urinary pain or dark urine, dated 2/3/22 Bactrim (antibiotic) DS Tablet 800-160 MG (Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim) Give 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice. A resident lacked an order and care plan for a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine in use, and oxygen was not administered as ordered for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care(Resident 23, Resident 26, Resident 6) Findings include: 1. On 1/3/23 at 10:09 A.M., Resident 23 was observed to have a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) machine at bedside was not labeled and the tubing was taped up. On 1/5/23 at 11:20 A.M., Resident 23 was observed to have to have a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) machine at bedside was not labeled and the tubing was taped up. On 1/5/23 at 10:16 A.M., the clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included but not limited to, cerebral vascular disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and unspecified atrial flutter. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident's as needed anti-anxiety medication was ordered for greater than 14 days. (Resident 26) Finding includes: On 1/4/23 at 8:28 A.M., Resident 26's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], went home 10/5/22, and was readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and anxiety. The most current admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 10/19/22 indicated Resident 26's cognition was moderately impaired and received an anti-anxiety medication 7 of 7 days of the assessment look back period. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to, the following: lorazepam tablet 0.5 mg (milligram) 1 (one) tablet by mouth every 8 (eight) hours as needed for anxiety, dated 10/12/22. Lorazepam 0.5 mg 1 (one) tablet by mouth at bedtime for anxiety dated 10/12/22.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-05-23 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing sheets were posted for the correct day for 5 of 5 days during the survey. Findings include: During an observation on 5/19/25 at 5:40 A.M., the posted nurse staffing sheet by the front door was dated 5/16/25. At that time, the posted nurse staffing sheet, dated 5/18/25, was viewed on the back hallway that did not have resident's on the hall. During an observation on 5/19/25 at 7:02 A.M., the posted nurse staffing sheet by the front door was dated 5/16/25. During an observation on 5/20/25 at 8:57 A.M., the posted nurse staffing sheet by the front door was dated 5/19/25. During an observation on 5/21/25 at 8:00 A.M., the posted nurse staffing sheet by the front door was dated 5/20/25. During an observation on 5/22/25 at 8:09 A.M., the posted nurse staffing sheet by the front door was dated 5/21/25. During an observation on 5/23/25 at 8:01 A.M., the posted nurse staffing sheet was dated 5/22/25. During an interview on 5/19/25 at 7:03 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the first shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-04-05 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing forms were posted in an area accessible to residents and visitors, or updated daily during 3 of 5 days of the survey. Findings include: On 4/1/24 at 8:40 A.M., posted nurse staffing forms were observed in the back hallway. At that time, all residents were located on the other side of the building. The forms were dated 3/18/24 and 3/19/24. On 4/3/24 at 10:00 A.M., the posted nurse staffing forms on the back hallway were dated 4/1/24 and 4/2/24. On 4/5/24 at 9:47 A.M., the posted nurse staffing forms on the back hallway were dated 4/3/24 and 4/4/24. On 4/5/24 at 9:48 A.M., the Administrator indicated the posted nurse staffing forms should be changed prior to the following shift, and by midnight for the next day. At that time, she indicated the back hallway was the only place the forms were posted, and were not located by the front door where visitors entered. On 4/5/24 at 11:00 A.M., a current Staffing Posting Requirement policy, dated 7/24/23, was provided and indicated .must post daily, at the beginning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-01-09 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate staffing sheets were posted daily for 5 of 5 days during the survey. Findings include: On 1/3/23 at 9:00 A.M., a staffing sheet was observed on the west hall across from the conference room. The staffing sheet indicated the date, total census, number of staff scheduled, and hours scheduled. Disciplines included were Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA). Actual hours worked were not included in the posting. On 1/6/23 at 10:43 A.M., staff posting sheets were provided for the following dates: 1/3/23 1/4/23 1/5/23 1/6/23 1/9/23 (proposed staffing) The staffing sheet for 1/3/23 indicated: Day shift 6:00 A.M.- 6:30 P.M.- Registered Nurses, number scheduled 2 (two), hours scheduled 24 6:00 A.M.- 6:30 P.M.- Licensed Practical Nurses, number scheduled 1 (one), hours scheduled 4 (four). The form did not indicate which 4 hours the LPN was scheduled to be in the building. 6:00 A.M.- 2:00 P.M.- Certified Nurse Aides, number scheduled 4 (four), hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 68 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alpha Home - A Waters CommunityIndianapolis, IN 1 of 5Belhaven Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Continental Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Heritage Place Care & Rehabilitation LLCWinchester, TN 1 of 5Hope Creek Nursing & RehabEast Moline, IL 1 of 5Landmark Of Richton Park Rehab & Nsg CtrRichton Park, IL 1 of 5Landmark at 95th Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Hyde Park Rehabilitation and Nursing CChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Itasca Rehabilitation and Nursing CentItasca, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Lincoln Park Rehabilitation and NursinChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Oak Lawn Rehabilitation and Nursing CeOak Lawn, IL 1 of 5Momence Meadows Nursing & RehabMomence, IL 1 of 5Parker Nursing & Rehab CenterStreator, IL 1 of 5The Waters Of Smyrna, LLCSmyrna, TN 1 of 5The Waters Of Springfield LLCSpringfield, TN 1 of 5Waters Of Clifty Falls, TheMadison, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Covington, TheCovington, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Dillsboro-Ross Manor, TheDillsboro, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Georgetown, TheGeorgetown, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Hobart Skilled Nursing Facility, TheHobart, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Lebanon, TheLebanon, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Martinsville, TheMartinsville, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing CtrMemphis, TN 1 of 5Waters Of Princeton, ThePrinceton, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Scottsburg, TheScottsburg, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Sullivan Nursing Facility, TheSullivan, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Syracuse Skilled Nursing Facility, TheSyracuse, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Tipton Skilled Nursing Facility, TheTipton, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Wabash Skilled Nursing Facility East TheWabash, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Wakarusa Skilled Nursing Facility, TheWakarusa, IN 1 of 5Westpark A Waters CommunityIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Ambassador Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 2 of 5Midway Neurological / Rehab CenterBridgeview, IL 2 of 5The Waters Of Cheatham, LLCAshland City, TN 2 of 5The Waters Of GallatinGallatin, TN 2 of 5The Waters Of Johnson City, LLCJohnson City, TN 2 of 5Waters Of Batesville, TheBatesville, IN 2 of 5Waters Of Castleton Skilled Nursing Facility, TheIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Waters Of Dunkirk Skilled Nursing Facility, TheDunkirk, IN 2 of 5Waters Of Greencastle, TheGreencastle, IN

Showing 40 of 68; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2013
BARNETT, LAURAIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/01/2022
WHITEHOUSE, ERINIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/10/2022
DECOLA, ROBERTIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/16/2019
BERKHOUSE, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/18/2021
DUNKLE, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2019
MILLER'S HEALTH SYSTEMS INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2013
THE WATERS OF ROCKPORT SKILLED NURSING FACILITY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$385K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 13%Other / private 36%

This home reported $385K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$356per resident / day
operating cost
$10,818per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$359per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155274. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next