No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Waters Of Princeton, The

1020 W Vine St, Princeton, IN 47670 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 95 certified beds · (812) 385-5238 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 385-5238 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jan 20261 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
308 3rd Ave · (812) 386-6776 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1000 W Broadway St · (812) 385-3747 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1410 W Broadway St · (812) 386-6825 · Call to confirm hours
Park
500 W Walnut St · (812) 270-8393 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
800 W Faith Blvd · (812) 635-9200

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.2%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.1%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms76.0%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.2%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.2%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication37.2%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.7%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.7%13.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication8.9%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.0%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.3%10.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.491.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.611.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.2–19.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.361.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.46
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.28
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.65
RN hoursweekends
39.1%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 62.7 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-16)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety or supervision of a resident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for falls resulting in major injury. This deficient practice resulted in a fall with a fractures requiring hospitalization. (Resident 43) Findings include: Resident 43's clinical record was reviewed on 8/23/23 at 2:21 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, displaced fracture of second cervical vertebra. Resident 43's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 7/31/23, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two people for mobility, transfers, and toileting. Resident 43's care plan dated 10/27/22 included, but was not limited to, Resident is at risk of falls due to history or recent fall, staff to assist with transfers, and staff to assist with toileting. A nursing progress note dated 8/8/23 at 20:22 (8:22 P.M.) indicated Resident 43 Depends upon staff for ADL care. All transfers by staff assist. Taken to BR (bathroom) prn (as needed) by staff. A Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly dated and labeled, failed to keep medications refrigerated until opening, and failed to destroy expired medications for 3 of 4 medication carts observed. (west hall medication cart and east halls medication carts) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/13/26 at 9:06 A.M., the following items were observed in the East back hall cart:Symbicort inhaler (no label) dated 9/28/25Humalog vial (no label or open date)loose medications:pink round tablet, imprint CL75white round tablet, imprint EP136white round tablet, imprint 1 (opposite side) 2white round tablet, imprint RE23orange round tablet, imprint 40 (opposite side) Hyellow oval tablet, imprint 18 (opposite side) Awhite oval tablet, imprint MA (opposite side) 3pink round tablet imprint RA 06orange round tablet imprint 128 (opposite side) Rorange round tablet imprint PH 034yellow round tablet imprint 7 98white round tablet imprint 50white oval tablet imprint 91 (opposite side) F 2. During an observation on 1/13/26 at 9:18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at palatable temperatures for 1 of 1 trays tested for temperature. (200-hall)Finding includes:1. During an interview on 1/12/26 at 10:31 A.M., Resident 5 indicated that she ate in her room and the food was cold by the time it got to her.During an interview on 1/12/26 at 10:55 A.M., Resident 11 indicated that the food was lukewarm when served.During an interview on 1/12/26 at 10:56 A.M., Resident 14 indicated that the food was always cold.During an interview on 1/12/26 at 1:35 P.M., Resident 35 indicated that the food was cold.During an interview on 1/12/26 at 1:45 P.M., Resident 40 indicated that the food was cold.During an interview on 1/13/26 at 8:37 A.M., Resident 8 indicated that the food was always cold. 2. During the Resident Council meeting on 1/13/26 at 1:37 P.M., 10 out of 10 residents indicated that the food was not hot when served. 3. On 1/14/26 at 11:11 A.M., [NAME] 14 was observed taking the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete and accurate for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for weight loss, 3 of 3 residents reviewed for insulin administration, and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds. (Resident 9, Resident 28, Resident 5, Resident 14, and Resident 36) Findings include:1. On 1/14/26 at 2:16 P.M., Resident 9's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and major depressive disorder. The most current Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/8/25, indicated Resident 9 was cognitively intact, required setup assistance for eating, weighed 175 pounds (lbs), and had a weight loss of 5 Percent (%) or more in the last month or 10% or more in last 6 months. A care conference was completed on 10/9/25 with the resident in attendance. Care conference notes indicated that the plan of care would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who desired to self-administer their medications were evaluated for capability to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 residents observed with medications in their room. (Resident 11)Finding includes:On 1/12/26 at 10:59 A.M., Resident 11 was observed in his recliner with a bottle of nasal spray, a tube a Neosporin, a tub of Balmex, and a tub of Burt's Beeswax on the bedside table.On 1/14/26 at 11:08 A.M., Resident 11's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cellulitis of buttock and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/3/25, indicated Resident 11 was cognitively intact, required setup assistance from staff for eating and required supervision of staff for transferring, and had one stage two and one stage three pressure ulcer.A care conference was completed on 1/5/26 with the resident in attendance. Care plans were reviewed.The clinical record lacked a self-administration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs, that were ordered beyond 14 days, included an evaluation of need for the medication after 14 days and indicated a specific duration of use for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for non-pressure related wounds. (Resident 36) Finding includes:On 1/13/26 at 1:22 P.M., Resident 36's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 36 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Hidradenitis Suppurativa and generalized anxiety. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/14/25, indicated Resident 36 was cognitively intact, required supervision from staff for toileting and transfers, and received antianxiety medication in the seven-day lookback period. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Clonazepam (an antianxiety medication) oral tablet 0.5 MG (milligrams). Give one tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety; Start date 5/15/25. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of assessments for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 53 and Resident 12) Findings include: 1. On 1/13/26 at 2:16 P.M., Resident 53's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 53 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and anxiety.The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated , 11/19/25, indicated Resident 53 was severely cognitively impaired, required substantial supervision (staff do more than half of the work) for toileting and bathing, and received antipsychotic, antidepressant, and antiplatelet medication during the seven day lookback period.Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Buspirone HCl Oral Tablet 5 MG (an antianxiety medication). Give 5 mg by mouth two times a day for anxiety, start date 9/29/25. The electronic medication administration record (eMAR) indicated Resident 53 received buspirone 5 MG on all seven days of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen services were provided according to physician orders for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Oxygen tubing not date. (Resident 11, Resident 14) Findings include:1. During a random observation on 1/12/26 at 11:08 A.M., Resident 14 was observed sitting in recliner with a nasal cannula had oxygen (O2) at 2.5 liter in his nose. The O2 and nebulizer tubing had no dated label, and the water bottle hooked onto the O2 concentrator had the date of 1/5/26. On 1/13/26 at 11:08 A.M., Resident 14's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, and Dementia. The Current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment date 12/29/25 indicated Resident 14 was cognitively intact. Resident 14 needed supervision for eating, toileting, transferrring, and dressing, also required oxygen. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician's orders and professional standard for 3 of 7 residents observed during medication pass. Three medication errors were observed during 39 opportunities for error in medication administration. This resulted in a 10.34% error rate. (Resident 66, Resident 57, and Resident 5) Findings include:1. During a medication administration observation on 1/14/26 at 7:27 A.M., QMA 9 allowed Resident 66 to administer her own Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation; Resident 66 took one puff of the inhaler. On 1/14/26 at 8:23 A.M., Resident 66's clinical record was reviewed. Physician orders included, but were not limited to:Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosol 160-4.5 MCG/ACT (micrograms/actuation) two puffs twice a dayThe clinical record lacked a physician orders for Resident 66 to self administer her medication.Resident 66 was not administered the correct dose of the inhaler and QMA 9 did not offer Resident 66 to rinse her mouth out after the inhaler…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication errors for 1 of 2 residents observed for insulin administration (Resident 57). Resident 57 received the wrong insulin. Finding includes: During a medication administration observation on 01/14/26 at 11:29 A.M., Resident 57's blood sugar was 308; RN 5 administered 10 units of insulin glargine (long acting insulin) to Resident 57. On 1/14/26 at 11:52 A.M., Resident 57's clinical record was reviewed. Physician orders included, but were not limited to:Basaglar (Insulin glargine) KwikPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (units/milliliters) Inject 50 units subcutaneously at bedtime for Diabetes Mellitus Start date 9/29/25Novolog (Insulin Aspart) Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML (short acting insulin) Inject 10 units subcutaneously three times a day for diabetes 5/15/2025RN 5 administered the wrong insulin to Resident 57. During an interview on 1/14/25 at 12:07 P.M., the facility was notified of the medication error; the Regional Support Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement proper use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and use of gloves for a random observation of wound care. (Resident 39) Findings include: On 1/15/26 at 1:40 P.M., during an observation of wound care, Registered Nurse (RN) 5 was observed performing the following steps during a dressing change for Resident 39:Donned gloves but did not apply gown for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) due to the resident being on EBP.Removed old dressing on the resident's right leg. Placed some of the dressing material on the floor using the same gloves.Placed a clean towel under the right leg without changing gloves.Touched the Resident's left leg and removed old dressing with the same gloves.Removed gloves Washed hands with soap and water for 30 seconds and applied new gloves. Placed new gloves and irrigated the underside of the right leg with normal saline x2.Patted the wound with a 2x2 gauze.Used the same gloved hand to apply alginate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was not an emergency call light in 6 of 6 public restrooms that could be utiized by residents in 2 of 2 observations. (Back Hallway, East Hallway) Findings Include: On 1/14/26 at 2:30 P.M., the woman's public restroom in the back hallway was observed to have no key or emergency call system. On 1/15/26 at 8:3 A.M., the public restrooms on back hall and east hall public were observed to have no key or emergency call bell systems. During an interview on 1/16/26 at 10:38 A.M., the administrator was not aware of the need to have an emergency call light or key for a public bathroom if could be accessed. She had been told different things. On 1/16/26 at 1:45 P.M., a policy for the call system was asked for and not received. 3.1-19(u)(2)

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drug records were in order and an account of all drugs were maintained for 2 of 2 nursing units reviewed. The narcotic drug count was not accurate. (East Unit, [NAME] Unit) Finding includes: On 8/27/25 at 10:51 a.m., RN 2 was observed to do a narcotic drug count on the East unit medication cart. The following was observed:hydrocodone- acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325 mg (milligram) -the narcotic count log indicated 23 available, RN 2 indicated 22 were in the drug pack.hydrocodone- acetaminophen Tablet 5-325 mg- the narcotic count log indicated 30 available, RN 2 indicated 29 were in the drug pack. RN 2 indicated she must have been in a hurry and forgot to sign the medications out after giving them, she typically signs the narcotic log as she gives them. On 8/27/25 at 11:04 a.m., QMA 2 was observed to do a narcotic drug count on the [NAME] unit medication cart. The following was observed:clonazepam oral tablet 0.5 mg - the narcotic count log indicated 17 available, QMA 2 indicated 16 were in the drug…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds. Wound treatments were not signed as completed on the Electronic Medical Administration Record (EMAR). Resident B Finding includes: On 6/9/25 8:47 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of left middle cerebral artery, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, aphasia following cerebral infarction, altered mental status, acquired absence of other right toe, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, occlusion and stenosis of carotid artery. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident B's cognition was severely impaired, impairment one side upper and lower, toileting partial/moderate assist,( helper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative of a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin/wounds. A treatment order was not obtained for a pressure injury, a resident representative was not notified of a pressure wound or facial bruising. (Resident B) Findings include: On 1/10/25 at 8:56 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, personality disorder, diabetes mellitus, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident B's cognition was severely impaired. Care plans included, but were not limited to: Wound is present - L (left) buttock, stage 2, date initiated 1/10/25. Interventions included, but were not limited to: Tx (treatment) as ordered, date initiate 1/10/25. January 2025 physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician's orders and professional standard for 4 of 4 residents observed during medication pass. (Resident 10, Resident 39, Resident 42, Resident 30) Five medication errors were observed during 31 opportunities for error in medication administration. This resulted in a 16.13 error rate. Findings include: 1. During a medication administration on 10/18/24 at 8:02 A.M., RN 6 prepared the following medications for Resident 10: one tablet of certirizine 10 mg, one tablet of desvenlafaxine 100 mg, one tablet of famotidine 10 mg, one tablet of furosemide 40 mg, one tablet of meloxicam 7.5 mg, one tablet of Nuedexta 20-10mg, one tablet of vitamin D3 5000 units, one tablet of asenapine 5mg, and mixed a packet of polyethylene glycol in 8oz of water. RN 6 took the medications to Resident 10; Resident 10 took all of the medications orally and drank the polyethylene gylcol mixed in water. RN 6 then went to the EDK and removed a tablet of metoprolol 25mg, placed the pill…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly dated and labeled, failed to keep medications refrigerated until opening, and failed to destroy expired medications for 2 of 2 medication carts observed. (100 hall west medication cart and 200 hall east medication cart) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 10/16/24 at 9:03 A.M., the 200 hall east medication cart contained the following items: Humalog insulin pen - opened; lacked opened on or expiration date Lantus insulin pen- opened; lacked opened on or expiration date, pen needle attached and not capped Latanoprost eye drops- expiration date 10/13/24 Lantus insulin pen - expiration date 9/23/24 Humalog insulin pen- lacked identification tag or resident name - expiration date 10/14/24 insulin aspart pen- name rubbed off of identification tag two insulin lispro pens - seal is unopened, tag on insulin states refrigerate until opening opened bottle of Pro-Stat (liquid protein)- lacked label or opened date 2. During an observation on 10/16/24 at 9:25 A.M., the 100 hall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at palatable temperatures for 1 of 1 trays tested for temperature. (200-hall) Finding includes: On 10/16/24 at 10:13 A.M., Resident 52 indicated the food was cold. On 10/16/24 at 10:38 A.M., Resident 31 indicated the food was cold. On 10/16/24 at 12:14 P.M., Resident 15 indicated the food tasted bad and was cold. On 10/17/24 at 10:45 A.M., Resident 42 indicated the food tasted bad and was cold. On 10/21/24 at 12:22 P.M., a test tray was obtained. Food temperatures for that meal were: BBQ chicken 102.9 F (Fahrenheit) Roasted potatoes 109.7 F Yellow squash 107.9 F At that time, the food tasted cold. On 10/21/24 at 12:31 P.M., the Dietary Manager expected food to be about 148 F when served. He indicated he was aware cold food was an issue and hoped to get new insulated holders and carts to help. On 10/22/24 at 10:05 A.M., the Dietary Manager provided an undated current Food Temperatures policy that indicated Best efforts will be made to present hot foods hot and cold foods cold at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was correctly prepared for 4 of 4 residents who received puree altered diets. Finding includes: On 10/17/24 at 10:01 A.M., [NAME] 5 was observed preparing 4 servings of pureed beef and cheddar sandwiches. [NAME] 5 added the following ingredients to the blender and blended in between each item: 8 slices of pre-cooked roast beef 1-ounce (oz) scoop of mayonnaise 1-oz scoop of mayonnaise 1-oz scoop of mayonnaise 4 hamburger buns torn up 2 1-oz scoops of mayonnaise 2 1-oz scoops of mayonnaise 4 slices of cheese torn up 2 1-oz scoops of mayonnaise At that time, [NAME] 5 indicated the food did not look right and it would probably taste like straight mayonnaise. She indicated she usually would add broth to help with the consistency, but the recipe did not call for it. That was a new recipe and she had never made it before. Cook 5 added 4 more 1-oz scoops of mayonnaise. (Total mayonnaise added was 13-oz.) Cook 5 went to the reach-in refrigerator and obtained milk. The best by date on the milk was 10/16/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared under sanitary conditions during 3 of 3 kitchen observations and 1 of 1 dining observations. Staff did not wear hairnets, and gloves were not changed before touching food items. (Dietary Manager, [NAME] 5, [NAME] 14, Activities Department Staff) Findings include: 1. During a lunchtime dining observation on 10/16/24 at 12:00 P.M., Activities Department staff were observed assembling and serving hot dogs for lunch in the dining room. Residents placed orders and staff assembled buns, hot dogs, condiments, and chili in the dining room. Staff did not change gloves in between touching the hot dog buns and touching condiment bottles. Staff were not wearing hairnets while assembling food. 2. On 10/16/24 at 9:12 A.M., the Dietary Manager was observed in the kitchen without a beard net. [NAME] 5 and [NAME] 14 were observed in the kitchen wearing a hairnet that did not cover all of their hair. 3. On 10/17/24 at 10:01 A.M., the Dietary Manager was observed in the kitchen without a beard net.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 10/17/24 at 12:08 P.M., Resident 16's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 16 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes mellitus. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/19/24, indicated Resident 16 was cognitively intact, required partial assistance from staff for toileting and bathing, and was completely dependent on staff for transfers. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Basaglar (insulin medication) Inject 10 unit subcutaneously every morning and at bedtime for diabetes, Start date 4/9/24 On the following dates subcutaneous insulin administration was documented by QMA 10 on the electronic medication administration record during the last 30 day period: 9/20/24 8:00 A.M. 9/27/24 8:00 A.M. 10/2/24 8:00 A.M. 10/3/24 8:00 A.M. 10/16/24 8:00 A.M. 10/17/24 8:00 A.M. 10/21/24 8:00 A.M. On 10/22/24 at 9:58 A.M., the Director of Nursing provided a document titled Qualified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician consultation was provided before treatment alterations occurred to modify medications prior to administration for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for crushed medications received. (Resident 47) Finding includes: On 10/18/24 at 10:23 A.M., Resident 47's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 47 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. The most recent Significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 9/13/24, indicated Resident 47 was severely cognitively impaired, required partial assistance from staff for eating, toileting, and bathing, and was completely dependent on staff for transfers. A progress note, dated 10/17/24 at 12:32 P.M., indicated Resident 47 had been given her medications in a crushed form. The clinical record, including physician orders, progress notes, care plan, and assessments, lacked an order for medications to be crushed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment's were completed within 14 days of admission for 1 resident reviewed for accidents and 1 resident reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident 259 and Resident 261) Findings included: 1. On 10/17/24 at 1:43 P.M., Resident 261's clinical record was reviewed. The resident's admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated it was in progress and was not complete. Resident 261 was admitted on [DATE]. 2. On 10/21/24 at 10:00 A.M., Resident 259's clinical record was reviewed. The resident's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated it was in progress and was not complete. On 10/22/24 at 9:45 A.M., the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated it was expected that an admission MDS be completed within 14 days after admission to facility, and the facility followed the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual guidelines for comprehensive assessments. 3.1-31(d)(1)

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessments were completed accurately for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls, 1 of 2 residents for nutrition, 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 50, Resident 30) Findings include 1. On 10/16/24 at 11:44 A.M., Resident 50 was observed sitting in a chair in the activities room with a chair alarm attached to the resident's clothing. On 10/18/24 at 1:25 P.M., Resident 50 was observed sitting in a chair in the activities room with a chair alarm. On 10/21/24 at 9:55 P.M., Resident 50 was observed sitting in a chair in the activities without a chair alarm. On 10/18/24 at 9:53 A.M., Resident 50's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, weakness, osteoarthritis, and dementia. The current Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident 50 was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident needed supervision for toileting, dressing, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for communication. A care plan was not developed for residents with English as a second language. (Resident 50) Findings include: 1. On 10/17/24 at 9:01 A.M., during a random observation in Resident 50's room there was no Spanish communication board available in room to meet the resident's needs if asked. On 10/18/24 at 9:53 A.M., Resident 50's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, weakness, osteoarthritis, and dementia. The current Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident 50 was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident needed supervision for toileting, dressing, and mobility. The resident was not coded this assessment for a chair alarm or significant weight loss. The clinical record lacked an order for the use of communication devices. The clinical record lacked a care plan to concerning the resident's communication needs. On 10/21/24 at 10:04…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility, failed to ensure that documentation of interventions were not revised for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls and revise a residents care plan after they returned to facility from a hospital admission with a urinary tract infection and sepsis for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary tract infections. (Resident 36, Resident 50). Findings include: 1. On 10/18/24 at 9:53 A.M., Resident 50's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, weakness, osteoarthritis, and dementia. The current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident 50 was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident needed supervision for toileting, dressing, and mobility. The resident was not coded in assessment for a chair alarm or significant weight loss. There were no orders for chair alarms or Dycem devices. The current fall risk care plan lacked interventions for a chair alarm and a Dycem device. During an interview on 10/21/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure practitioner's diagnostic practices met professional standard of care for 1 of 1 resident diagnosed with scizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder after admission. (Resident 47) Finding includes: On 10/18/24 at 10:23 A.M., Resident 47's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 47 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. The most recent Significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 9/13/24, indicated Resident 47 was severely cognitively impaired, required partial assistance from staff for eating, toileting, and bathing, was completely dependent on staff for transfers, and received antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications during the 7-day lookback period. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Depakote sprinkles (antiepileptic medication) oral capsule delayed release 125 MG, Give one capsule by mouth three times a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care consistent with professional standards of practice were received to prevent pressure ulcers from progressing by administering treatments as physician ordered and treatments were administered by qualified personnel for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wounds. (Resident 16) Finding includes: On 10/17/24 at 12:08 P.M., Resident 16's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes mellitus. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/19/24, indicated Resident 16 was cognitively intact, required partial assistance from staff for toileting and bathing, and was completely dependent on staff for transfers. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Sacral wound: Cleanse and pat dry, apply skin prep, and cover with bordered gauze every day shift, Start date 10/12/24. Left heel: cleanse with wound cleanser, apply skin prep to peri wound, apply collagen to wound bed, and cover with silver alginate.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure diet recommendations were followed in 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 34) Findings include: On 10/17/24 at 1:11 P.M., Resident 34's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, schizoaffective disorder, and dementia. The current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 50 was moderated cognitively impaired. The resident needed partial assistance to for toileting and dressing. The resident was noted for significant weight loss during the assessment period. Physician orders included, but were not limited, General diet, regular texture, and thin liquid consistency dated 4/12/24. Weekly weight records as follows: 10/2/2024 1:06 P.M. 124.5 Lbs. (Pounds) 9/25/2024 10:35 A.M. 126.5 Lbs. 9/16/2024 9:25 A.M. 121.5 Lbs. 9/9/2024 10:49 A.M. 122.0 Lbs. 9/2/2024 9:34 A.M. 128.0 Lbs. 8/23/2024 7:22 A.M. 124.5 Lbs. 8/1/2024 10:12 A.M. 128.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a pharmacy recommendation was followed for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 47). Finding includes: On 10/18/24 at 10:23 A.M., Resident 47's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 47 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and cognitive communication deficit. The most recent Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 9/13/24, indicated Resident 47 was severely cognitively impaired, required partial assistance from staff for eating, toileting, and bathing, and was completely dependent on staff for transfers. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Omeprazole (proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication) 40 MG capsule delayed release, give one capsule by mouth one time a day. Start date 6/8/24 The clinical record lacked a care plan related to the use of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication. A pharmacy recommendation, dated 9/14/24, indicated a pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement infection prevention measures by following physician orders for enhanced barrier precautions for 1 of 1 residents observed for wound care. (Resident 6) Finding includes: On 10/17/24 at 10:40 A.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, seizures and bipolar disorder. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/16/24, indicated Resident 6 was severely cognitively impaired and required partial assistance from staff for eating, bathing, toileting, and transfers. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Enhanced Barrier Precautions, start date 9/16/24 Left calf abrasion: Cleanse with wound cleanser, apply collagen and secure with rolled gauze due to fragile skin. No tape on skin every day shift, Start date 9/28/24. During an observation of wound care on 10/21/24 at 9:11 A.M., LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)12 entered Resident 6's room. Resident 6's door had a sign that indicated enhanced barrier precautions. LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds. A care plan was not developed after a resident returned from the hospital with a new diagnosis and new medication order. (Resident M) Finding includes: On 7/2/24 at 10:19 A.M., Resident M's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, cellulitis of the right lower limb, dated 5/22/24. The most current admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 4/24/24, indicated Resident M had moderate cognitive impairment, required partial to moderate assistance (staff does less than half) for sit to stand transfers and toileting, was at risk for pressure ulcers, and had no ulcers, wounds, or skin issues. The facility census indicated Resident M was discharged to the hospital on 5/20/24 and returned to the facility on 5/22/24. Hospital discharge papers, dated 5/22/24, indicated Resident M was discharged to the facility with a new diagnosis of cellulitis of right lower extremity and had new orders for clindamycin (an antibiotic) 300 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medications. A resident's blood pressure parameters were not followed for giving a medication. (Resident B) Finding includes: On [DATE] at 9:26 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, intellectual disabilities, generalized epilepsy, hypotension. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated [DATE] indicated Resident B's cognition was moderately impaired. Resident B expired in the facility on [DATE]. Care plans were reviewed and no care plan related to hypotension was developed. Physicians orders for March and [DATE] included, but were not limited to: [DATE]: Midodrine HCI (hydrochloride) (antihypotensive agent ) oral tablet 5 mg (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for bp (blood pressure) hold if bp above 100/50, order date [DATE]. [DATE]: Midodrine HCI oral tablet 5 mg give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. Food was served on dishes that were not thoroughly sanitized, emergency use of paper goods was delayed for 55 of 55 residents served meals in the facility. The facility failed to ensure that the temperature of unit refrigerators were with acceptable range in 3 of 3 refrigerators observed. ( Kitchen, East Hall Nourishment Pantry) Findings include: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 8/21/23 starting at 8:58 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated that the temperature gauge on the dishwasher was not functioning properly and he had been using a digital thermometer to record temperatures. At that time, a load of dishes including, but not limited to, trays and plate covers was being ran through the dishwasher. The Dietary Manager used his digital thermometer to take the temperature of the wash water. The thermometer read 112 degrees Fahrenheit (F). At that time, the Dietary Manager indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to schedule care plan conferences and revise care plans for 12 of 12 residents reviewed. (Resident 14, Resident 16, Resident 20, Resident 22, Resident 24, Resident 25, Resident 30, Resident 36, Resident 38, Resident 39, Resident 43, and Resident 47). Findings include 1. On 8/23/23 at 9:20 A.M., Resident 14's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and anxiety. The most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. The progress notes lacked documentation of a care plan conference being conducted. The MDS care plan binder lacked documentation of care plan conference. During an interview on 8/21/23 at 3:51 P.M., Resident 14 indicated she had never been asked to come to a care plan conference 2. On 8/23/23 at 1:47 P.M., Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included but were not limited to atrial fibrillation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored under proper temperature controls for 1 of 2 medication storage refrigerators reviewed during the survey, and that medications refused by a resident were disposed of properly (Resident 16, [NAME] hall, East Hall). Findings include: 1. During observation of the medication cart on the east hall on 8/23/23 at 11:00 A.M., loose pills were observed in the drawers of the medication cart. These included: 2 small white pills, 3 oblong white pills, 1 large yellow round pill, and 1 small yellow round pill. The pills were removed by QMA 5, who indicated they are supposed to dispose of them in the sharps container attached to the cart. 2. During observation of the medication cart on the west hall on 8/23/23 at 11:20 A.M., loose pills were observed in the drawers of the medication cart. These included: 1 oblong white pill, 2 medium yellow pills, one gold gel pill, 1 large white triangular pill, 3 small pink pills, 4 small white oblong pills, 5 white…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 4 of 6 resident rooms, 1 of 2 medication storage rooms, 1 of 1 pantries, and 4 of 4 units reviewed for environment. Floors were sticky and dirty, there were holes in the walls, sticky substances were on surfaces, drawers were missing, dressers were in disrepair, and clutter was present (2 east halls, 1 west hall, 1 locked unit, west medication room, east pantry, and room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]). Findings include: 1. During observation on 8/21/23 at 10:00 A.M., the floor in the hallway next to the kitchen was observed to be dirty, with a 10x 6 chunk out of the tile in front of the kitchen door. On 8/22/23 at 8:00 A.M. the same was observed. On 8/23/23 at 8:02 A.M. the same was observed. On 8/24/23 at 8:03 A.M. the same was observed. 2. During observation of the main dining area and the two east halls on 8/21/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt to obtain labs, indicate clinical signs of a UTI (urinary tract infection), or ensure the proper antibiotic was prescribed prior to administering an antibiotic for behaviors for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for current antibiotic use. (Resident 47) Findings include: During an interview on 8/22/23 at 1:07 P.M., LPN (licensed practical nurse) 19 indicated that resident 47 had been prescribed an antibiotic by hospice, due to agitated behaviors, without attempting to obtain a urine specimen for lab review of a possible urinary tract infection. On 8/23/23 at 1:07 P.M. Resident 47's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, severe dementia with mood disturbances and major depressive disorder with severe psychotic symptoms. A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 6/14/23, indicated resident 47 was severely cognitively impaired and required assistance for mobility, transfers, toileting, and bathing. A progress note, dated 8/18/23 at 12:30 P.M. indicated hospice had given an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 38). Findings include: During an observation on 8/21/23 at 2:05 P.M., Resident 38's oxygen was observed to be on at 2.5 liters per minute (lpm) per nasal cannula (nc), without humidification. During an interview with the resident at the same time, she indicated the oxygen dries her nose out bad. The top of the oxygen concentrator was covered with a white powdery substance, the external filter had small amount of white powdery substance, inside filter had a larger amount of white powdery substance. Tubing was dated 8/20/23. On 8/24/23 at 11:41 A.M., the resident was observed asleep with oxygen on at 2+ lpm per nc, without humidification. The concentrator was covered with white powdery substance, external filter has small amount of white powdery substance, inside filter has more white powdery substance. Tubing dated 8/20/23.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff received sufficient training to ensure resident safety and reduce the number of adverse events or other resident complications for 1 of 1 residents reviewed who use the mechanical lift. (Resident 37) Findings include: During an interview with Resident 37 on 8/21/23 at 3:55 P.M., the resident indicated that the day before yesterday the mechanical lift had tipped over with her in it. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/25/23 at 2:20 P.M., she indicated she was not at work that day but was aware of the incident. She indicated there were no injuries. During an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 8/28/23 at 8:43 A.M., she indicated she was aware of the incident and there was no injury. She indicated that on 8/11/23 at 12:12 P.M., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 10 and CNA 14 were re-educated on making sure the legs on the mechanical lift were fully spread before using it. She indicated they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-08-28 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the complete and accurate staffing records were posted for 6 of 6 days reviewed during the survey (8/21/23, 8/22/23, 8/23/23, 8/24/23, 8/25/23, 8/28/23). Findings include: 1. On 8/21/23 at 2:35 P.M., a nurse staffing record was observed hanging in a container on a wall in the main dining room, with a binder, next to the activity board. The posted nurse staffing record included the facility name and the current date. The record included, but was not limited to, the following information: Number of RN (Registered Nurse), LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), QMA (Qualified Medication Aide), and CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) scheduled for the day. Number of hours scheduled for RN, LPN, QMA, and CNA for each shift for the day. The record was missing the actual number of hours worked for each discipline, the total number of staff scheduled, the total number of hours scheduled, and the total actual number of hours scheduled On 8/24/23 at 2:04 P.M., copies of the daily nurse staffing records for 8/21/23 through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 68 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alpha Home - A Waters CommunityIndianapolis, IN 1 of 5Belhaven Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Continental Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Heritage Place Care & Rehabilitation LLCWinchester, TN 1 of 5Hope Creek Nursing & RehabEast Moline, IL 1 of 5Landmark Of Richton Park Rehab & Nsg CtrRichton Park, IL 1 of 5Landmark at 95th Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Hyde Park Rehabilitation and Nursing CChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Itasca Rehabilitation and Nursing CentItasca, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Lincoln Park Rehabilitation and NursinChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Oak Lawn Rehabilitation and Nursing CeOak Lawn, IL 1 of 5Momence Meadows Nursing & RehabMomence, IL 1 of 5Parker Nursing & Rehab CenterStreator, IL 1 of 5The Waters Of Smyrna, LLCSmyrna, TN 1 of 5The Waters Of Springfield LLCSpringfield, TN 1 of 5Waters Of Clifty Falls, TheMadison, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Covington, TheCovington, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Dillsboro-Ross Manor, TheDillsboro, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Georgetown, TheGeorgetown, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Hobart Skilled Nursing Facility, TheHobart, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Lebanon, TheLebanon, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Martinsville, TheMartinsville, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing CtrMemphis, TN 1 of 5Waters Of Rockport Skilled Nursing Facility, TheRockport, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Scottsburg, TheScottsburg, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Sullivan Nursing Facility, TheSullivan, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Syracuse Skilled Nursing Facility, TheSyracuse, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Tipton Skilled Nursing Facility, TheTipton, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Wabash Skilled Nursing Facility East TheWabash, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Wakarusa Skilled Nursing Facility, TheWakarusa, IN 1 of 5Westpark A Waters CommunityIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Ambassador Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 2 of 5Midway Neurological / Rehab CenterBridgeview, IL 2 of 5The Waters Of Cheatham, LLCAshland City, TN 2 of 5The Waters Of GallatinGallatin, TN 2 of 5The Waters Of Johnson City, LLCJohnson City, TN 2 of 5Waters Of Batesville, TheBatesville, IN 2 of 5Waters Of Castleton Skilled Nursing Facility, TheIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Waters Of Dunkirk Skilled Nursing Facility, TheDunkirk, IN 2 of 5Waters Of Greencastle, TheGreencastle, IN

Showing 40 of 68; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PUTNAM COUNTY HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/01/2012
SEIBEL, KATHERINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/20/2013
WEATHERFORD, DENNISIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2012
BRAY, ARNOLDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2012
FRY, JANICEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2012
HEADLEY, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2012
LANDRY, KEITHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2020
LEWIS, KATRINAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/21/2022
MANN, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
O'HAIR, DENNISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2012
COUNTY HOSPITAL MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 12%Other / private 17%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$313per resident / day
operating cost
$9,520per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$319per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155275. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next